Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 2. Oil-Water Separation and Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate

Abstract

Oil-water separation for produced water (PW) originating from an oil extraction site in South Kuwait was carried out using bleached, esterified cellulosic material from used coffee grounds. Thereafter, earth-alkaline metal ions, specifically calcium ions, of the de-oiled PW were removed by precipitation with sodium carbonate to give access to pure sodium chloride as industrial salt from the remaining PW. While the purity of the precipitated calcium carbonate (CaCO3) depends on the precipitation conditions, CaCO3 of up to 95.48% purity can be obtained, which makes it a salable product. The precipitation of CaCO3 decreases the amount of calcium ions in PW from 11,300 ppm to 84 ppm.

Share and Cite:

Salem, F. , Almansoori, N. , AlBalooshi, H. , Alshehhi, N. , Almheiri, M. , Poulose, V. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 2. Oil-Water Separation and Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 16, 467-488. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2024.167026.

1. Introduction

Produced water (PW) is an appreciable side product of oil and gas operations, amounting to 250 million barrels per day in 2020 [1] [2]. It is predicted to reach 650 million barrels per day within the next 2 decades [3] due to the continuous maturing of the exploited oil fields and due to the development of new fields. At the moment, the global average PW to oil ratio is 7 barrels of PW for every barrel of oil [4]. PW is a very complex fluid and carries varying concentrations of metal salts and hydrocarbons as well as additives that the operators have added for a more perfect oil/gas extraction operation [5] [6]. If released to the environment directly, PW is a potent environmental pollutant [7]-[11]. Also, PW is highly corrosive, damaging pipelines and general infrastructure of oil/gas operations [12]-[19] If the effort is undertaken to purify PW and separate it into its components, namely into the water, sodium salt (mostly NaCl), earth-alkaline salts (mostly calcium salts, in form of calcium carbonate) and residual oil, PW can be seen as a significant resource of water, salt and a remaining hydrocarbon fraction [20], where the salts need to be separated into sodium and calcium salts for their commercial use.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1. (a) Major ion content in seawater. Data taken from [21]; (b) Salt content with major ions in PW from an oil and gas operation in South Kuwait (average over 3 samplings within 2 years) [22 and current study].

Figure 1(a) and Figure 1(b), respectively, show the average salt contents of seawater and of PW from the SK oilfield under study in this work. It can be noted that the sodium ion (Na+) and chloride (Cl) concentrations in PW are 4.25 and 4.80 times those of the average saltwater. In the PW under study, the calcium ion (Ca2+) content is 24.2 times that of average seawater, where calcium is the second most abundant metal cation after sodium, but before magnesium (Mg2+). Nevertheless, the magnesium concentration in PW is 1.91 times that in average seawater. Salt production from seawater as well as from other naturally occurring brines [23] has been known for a long time, going back to the Phoenicians in the 9th century BC [24] [25]. In recent times, desalination to procure fresh water has been combined to obtain salt from the rejected brine in evaporation ponds, too [26]-[28]. Salt production has also been achieved by rejecting brines of reverse osmosis processes, for instance in sea-water desalination plants [29]-[31]. In comparison, salt reclamation from PW of oil and gas operations is being carried out more seldomly.

Figure 2 shows schematically the possibilities of purifying PW from oil and gas operations. The commercial products that can be derived from PW during the purification steps are highlighted in orange. Usually, the first step for the purification of produced water (PW) from oil and gas extraction processes is its separation into oil, gas and water with the help of a three-phase separator [32], before further oil separation from the water is carried out by corrugated plate interceptor (cpi) [33], hydro cyclone [34], and possibly air flotation [35]. Sometimes, such as is the case in the oil extraction operation in South Kuwait the PW of which is the subject of the current study, the pre-treated PW is disposed of underground, in so-called disposal wells [36].

In cases where PW is to be used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) [37], for cooling or irrigation purposes [38]-[40], it needs to undergo further purification. Membrane filtration [41] [42] or filtration through a sorbent layer [43] that may include sand [44] can be added to the purification scheme, depending on the further use of the PW.

Figure 2. Schematic layout of the purification steps for PW from oil and gas operations. The processes within the red box are the focus of this work.

Looking at the salt reclamation from PW, both calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and sodium chloride (NaCl) are valuable commodities. The extraction of other metal salts such as lithium, vanadium and neodymium salts would be highly lucrative [45], but for operations of this type existing technology would need to be developed further. It must be kept in mind that currently treatment of PW is not profitable or sustainable as a business model [45].

The majority of produced water (PW) from an oilfield in South Kuwait undergoes a primary oil-water separation process based on gravity separation and is subsequently disposed of in disposal wells. The space in the disposal wells is limited and the drilling of new disposal wells is costly. In addition, PW has been shown to do significant damage to the production infrastructure as it is highly corrosive [5]. Efforts have been made to come up with a sustainable solution for the PW of this oilfield, which involves more stringent treatment of the PW with concomitant extraction and separation of commercially valuable constituents from it. The oil-field is a mature field with a water cut of 1:4. Production from 40 - 60 different wells is combined to supply a central processing substation. The total field is comprised of over 1000 wells [5]. Recently, we have reported that the composition of PW from an oil field can vary, even over short periods of time [46]. Tables 1-3 show the average compositions of three PW samples used in this and a previous study [22] that were taken over a period of three years. Na+ concentrations varied between 35,600 and 51,500 ppm, Ca2+ concentrations between 7670 and 11,300 ppm, and Mg2+ concentrations between 1730 and 3050 ppm.

The proposed purification of PW from the South Kuwaiti oilfield entails, apart from the existing pre-treatment by gravity separation, membrane filtration [47] and an adsorptive filtration [22] to separate the remaining oil from the water. Subsequently, the calcium of PW is separated out by precipitation as CaCO3. Thereafter, the water is separated from the remaining salt content, mostly NaCl, by either solar pond distillation or reverse osmosis (Figure 2). Most of these steps have been detailed in earlier communications [22] [47] [48], where the adsorptive filtration cellulosic material from used coffee grounds (SCG) [22] [49] [50] is utilized, which has been treated with aq. NaOH to separate lignin from the cellulose of the coffee grounds. It must be noted that the price that could be obtained both for the industrial salt (NaCl) and for the precipitated CaCO3 is an integral part of the financial sustainability of the entire PW treatment process [48].

The processes shown in Figure 2 within the red box are the focus of this work, where the current contribution primarily deals with purity considerations in regard to the precipitated CaCO3, where CaCO3 is precipitated from the PW under different conditions. Also, the authors tried to find out whether it would be better to bleach the SCG before esterification to give a good sorbent material. Thirdly, the authors attempted to utilize leaf material from desert squash (Citrullus colocynthis) as a cellulose source that after esterification could also be used as sorbent material in the adsorptive oil-water separation process.

Table 1. Properties and ion content of PW-1, sourced from an oil production in South Kuwait collected in November 2021—This PW was treated with SDG-octanoate/AC [21].

Total dissolved solids

132,780 ppm

Chloride (Cl)

75,660 pm

Sodium (Na+)

35,600 ppm

Sulfate ( S O 4 2 )

18 pm

Potassium (K+)

1520 ppm

Bicarbonate ( HC O 3 )

140 pm

Calcium (Ca2+)

7670 ppm

Silicon (Si)

12.3 ppm

Magnesium (Mg2+)

1730 ppm

Total Iron (Fe)

1.36 ppm

Barium (Ba2+)

2.3 ppm

Dissolved oxygen

3 ppm

Strontium (Sr2+)

255 ppm

pH at 25˚C

6.88

Table 2. Properties and ion content of PW-2, sourced from the same oil production site in South Kuwait in January 2022, 3 months after PW-1—This PW was treated either with SDG-palmitate/AC or with SDG-acetate/AC [22].

Total dissolved solids

193,350 ppm

Chloride (Cl)

110,090 pm

Sodium (Na+)

51,500 ppm

Sulfate ( S O 4 2 )

355 pm

Potassium (K+)

1800 ppm

Bicarbonate ( HC O 3 )

300 pm

Calcium (Ca2+)

11,200 ppm

Silicon (Si)

ND

Magnesium (Mg2+)

3050 ppm

Total Iron (Fe)

ND

Barium (Ba2+)

2.4 ppm

Dissolved oxygen

ND

Strontium (Sr2+)

460 ppm

pH at 25˚C

6.02

Table 3. Ion content of PW-3, sourced from the same oil production site in South Kuwait as in ref. [22], after treatment with bleached SDG-acetate/AC [this work]. PW3 was collected in February 2024.

Sodium (Na+)

49.600 ppm

Strontium (Sr2+)

416 pm

Potassium (K+)

2192 ppm

Aluminum (Al3+)

0.30 pm

Calcium (Ca2+)

11,300 ppm

Cobalt (Co), lead (Pb),
manganese (Mn),
nickel (Ni)

<0.1 ppm

Magnesium (Mg2+)

2676 ppm

Total Iron (Fe)

ND

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

8.5 L of a produced water (PW) sample was obtained from an oil extraction operation in South Kuwait. The PW had been submitted to oil-water separation with a three-way separator and with corrugated plate interceptors. Nevertheless, it still carried appreciable amounts of hydrocarbons. Spent coffee grounds (SCGs) were obtained from a selection of commercially available coffee brands. Pyridine (BDH) was dried over solid KOH and N, N-dimethylacetamide (Sigma Aldrich) was dried over MgSO4. Acetyl chloride (Sigma Aldrich) was used without further purification. Commercial Clorox® was used as bleaching agent. It had a sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) content of 3.5 w%. Potassium hydroxide (KOH pellets, Sigma Aldrich), sodium hydroxide (NaOH pellets, BDH Analr), anhydrous sodium carbonate (soda, eurolab), activated charcoal (Sigma Aldrich, acid-washed with hydrochloric acid), hexane (Panreac) and dichloromethane (CH2Cl2, Sigma Aldrich) were used as is. Water used to make solutions and to wash the precipitated salts was AlAinwater® of drinking water quality.

Torrefaction of SCGs was carried out in a Carbolite oven. Post-reaction, samples were dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet. Reaction mixtures were stirred on WiseStir magnetic stirrers. The ash contents of the commercial activated charcoal (AC), SCG, the hydroxide extracted SCG, the bleached SCG as well as the bleached SCG-ester were determined by heating respective samples in crucibles (79C-00, Waldenwanger, Berlin) in a Carbolite oven at 600˚C for 3 h, where the mass of the resulting ash is expressed as weight % of the originally weighed-in sample. The preparation of the SCG material used as the starting material for the bleaching process was described previously [22]. The ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy) analyses of the salt crystals were carried out by CCIC Middle East FZE-Fujairah Branch. The laboratory is accredited. For the ICP-OES measurements, an Agilent ICP-OES Model-5110 was used after the digestion of the samples with HNO3 in a microwave digestor. Infrared spectra of the SCG materials and the derived esterified cellulosic materials were carried out as KBr pellets with a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 2 FT-IR spectrometer. TOC measurements were performed with a Shimadzu TOC-4200.

2.2. Preparation of the Bleached Cellulosic Sorbent Material from Spent Coffee Grounds

2.2.1. Preparation of Bleached SCG from Torrified SCG

To a suspension of hydroxide extracted and dried SCG (10 g) in H2O (150 mL) was given Clorox® (50 mL) and the resulting mixture was stirred for 5 h at rt. Thereafter, the mixture was filtered through a sintered glass filter. Thereafter, the filter cake was transferred to a metal sieve with a mesh size of 125 μm, and the obtained mass was thoroughly washed with 3 × 25 mL H2O and dried for 10 h at 37˚C. Yield 5.55 g. (Figure 3)

2.2.2. Esterification of the Bleached SCG-Derived Cellulose

Coffee grounds (extracted with NaOH, non-sieved, 1.0 g, 6.15 mmol, one cellulose unit, bleached) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and dimethylacetamide (35 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine (2.6 g, 32.5 mmol) and acetyl chloride (2.0 g, 25.0 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 3 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 150 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the esters). The ensuing mixture was separated through a sintered glass funnel by vacuum filtration. The filter cake was then washed with dichloromethane (30 mL) and hexane (30 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C. (Yield = 1.11 g).

Figure 3. Sequence used to obtain bleached cellulosic material from SCG, adapted from ref. [49] [50]. The preparation of cellulosic material from SCG has also been described elsewhere [22].

2.2.3. Esterification of Cellulosic Material Derived from Leaves of Citrullus colocynthis

Crushed leaves of Citrullus colocynthis (extracted with ethanol and with aq. NaOH, bleached, 1.0 g, 6.15 mmol, one cellulose unit) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and dimethylacetamide (35 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine (2.6 g, 32.5 mmol) and acetyl chloride (2.0 g, 25.0 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 3 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 150 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the esters). The ensuing mixture was separated through a sintered glass funnel by vacuum filtration. The filter cake was then washed with dichloromethane (30 mL) and hexane (30 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C (Yield = 1.10 g).

2.3. Oil-Water Separation by Adsorptive Filtration on Bleached SCG-Acetate

For the adsorptive filtration of PW, a glass column (length 35 cm, inner diameter 1.70 cm) was used. The column was filled with a well-mixed sorbent mixture of cellulose acetate (1.20 g) and activated carbon (3.60 g, 1:3 w/w). Sand (30 g) was added as a protective layer to the top of the sorptive material. The column was run with 1 atm pressure, initially at 500 mL per day. The de-oiled water was collected in plastic jerry cans, which thereafter were closed. PW (8.5 L) was filtered through the column. TOC measurements of the filtered PW were performed with a Shimadzu TOC-4200. The TOC of the filtered water was measured to be below 50 ppm. The metal cationic content of the filtered PW was determined by ICP-OES and is shown in Table 3.

2.4. Salt Crystallization from De-Oiled PW

CaCO3 Crystallization from De-Oiled PW Using Conc. aq. Solutions of Na2CO3

1) At room temperature, solid Na2CO3 (7.00 g) was added within 30 sec. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was washed with H2O (50 mL) and subsequently dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C (14 h) to give a white crystalline solid, (yield: 5.83 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.

2) At room temperature, solid Na2CO3 (5.00 g) was added dropwise within 30 sec. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was washed with H2O (50 mL) and subsequently dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C (14 h) to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 4.95 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.

3) At room temperature, solid Na2CO3 (3.00 g) was added dropwise within 30 sec. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was washed with H2O (50 mL) and subsequently dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C (14 h) to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 2.56 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.

4) At room temperature, an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (7.00 g in 50 mL H2O) was added dropwise within 5 min. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 5.77 g). This experiment was repeated with the difference that the filter cake was washed with H2O (50 mL) to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 5.75 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.

5) At room temperature, an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (5.00 g in 35 mL H2O) was added dropwise within 5 min. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 4.91 g).

6) At room temperature, an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (3.00 g in 21 mL H2O) was added dropwise within 5 min. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 2.47 g).

The samples from experiments 1.4.1.1-1.4.1.3 and 2.4.1.1-2.4.1.3 were stored in small plastic containers and sent within the week of the experiment to CCIC, Fujairah, for ICP analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Oil and Water Separation by Adsorptive Filtration

The preparation of non-bleached, torrified (treated) SCG had been published previously [22], see also ref. [49] [50]. The subsequent bleaching of the SCG was achieved easily by the addition of commercial Clorox® to a suspension of treated SCG. That reaction could be made out visually by the significant lightening of the color of the material. After stirring the mixture for 5h rt, it was filtered through a glass filter. Filtration proved to be slow, and the material needed to be washed copiously. For this, the material was transferred to a 125 μm metal sieve. Very often, organic materials have inorganic salts incorporated or adhering to the surface. A measure of the inorganic content of the material is the ash content, where the material is heated to 600˚C and the organic material is combusted, leaving the inorganics as ash. Here, it can be seen that the treatment of organic material with inorganic salts can contaminate the surface of the material, where the adhering inorganic salts cannot be removed completely by successive washings. In this regard, the ash content of the SCG material was measured after each treatment. At the outset, SCG, after torrefaction, had an ash content of 1.11 ± 0.06 w% (Figure 4). The ash content of SCG increased significantly to 10.96 ± 1.23 w% (Figure 4) after basic extraction of the material with aq. NaOH to remove the lignin fraction from the material. Here, it could be imagined that sodium ions still remain with the extracted SCG. After the bleaching process, the ash content of the material halved to 4.48 ± 0.28 w% (Figure 5), most likely due to successive washings. Interestingly, the subsequent esterification of the bleached SCG decreased the ash content to a negligible level (0.45 ± 0.03 w%, Figure 5), indicating the ash content of the extracted SCG most likely is due to sodium ions associated with hydroxy groups of the sugar units of the cellulosic material. The esterification of these hydroxy groups releases the sodium ions. The commercial-activated AC was found to have an ash content of 8.00 ± 0.16 w%.

Figure 4. Infrared spectrum of bleached SCG.

Figure 5. Esterification of cellulose with acetyl chloride in the presence of pyridine.

As a second source of cellulosic sorption material, the authors looked at the leaves of Citrullus colocynthis, a vine plant that grows on arid lands. It is known under a number of names such as Abu Jahl’s melon, colocynth, bitter apple and the vine of Sodom. In the UAE, it is also called the desert gourd or desert squash. Citrullus colocynthis leaves were collected in Tohwayya Wadi, Al Ain. The leaves were washed and subsequently dried for two weeks at rt and crushed in a mortar. Thereafter, they were stirred in ethanol to extract small organic molecules including chlorophyll. Then, the leaves were dried at 37˚C. Thereafter, they were subjected to basic extraction of the material with aq. NaOH to remove the lignin fraction from the cellulosic material (Figure 6). Thereafter, the leaves were heated to 200˚C and ground. They were bleached with an aq. solution of Clorox®, filtered and washed with water. Subsequently, they were dried at 120˚C over 16 h. Finally, they were submitted to esterification with acetyl chloride (AcCl). The IR spectral data showed an incomplete esterification of the material (Figure 7). Therefore, the material was submitted to a second esterification under the same conditions, however, it could be noted that esterification of all hydroxy functions of the cellulosic material could not be achieved. Therefore, further studies with this material were not carried out.

Figure 6. Cellulosic material from leaves of Citrullus colocynthis after extraction with ethanol (EtOH) and subsequently with aq. NaOH.

Figure 7. Partially acetylated cellulosic material from leaves of Citrullus colocynthis.

3.2. Precipitation of Earth-Alkaline Metal Ions from Produced Water - Effect of the Precipitation Method on the Purity of the Precipitated CaCO3

A number of papers have been reported on the crystallization of CaCO3 from aqueous solutions [51], including in the presence of other ions [52]. Crystallization can be induced by a liquid-liquid system where both Ca2+ and C O 3 2 ions are present [53] or by the gas-liquid system where carbon dioxide (CO2) is bubbled through a solution of Ca(OH)2 or CaCl2 [54]-[56] in the presence of ammonium hydroxide or amine-containing solutions [57] [58].

In the current study, the de-oiled PW which had been filtered through a column of AC and bleached SCG-Ac, was treated with either solid Na2CO3 or a concentrated aqueous solution of Na2CO3. The major concentrations of earth-alkaline cation in the PW before the treatment with Na2CO3 are given in Table 4.

Table 4. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after de-oiling by adsorptive filtration over bleached SCG-OAc/AC.

Earth-alkaline ion

Abundance

Calcium (Ca2+)

11300 ppm

Magnesium (Mg2+)

2676 ppm

Strontium (Sr2+)

416 pm

In the first series of experiments, solid Na2CO3 (3 g, 5 g, 7 g, all for 200 mL PW) was added to PW within 30 seconds. The precipitate formed was filtered after 10 min., washed with H2O (50 mL) and dried over 37˚C. Filtrate and washings were kept separate, Thereafter, the cationic composition of the precipitated salt was obtained by ICP-OES analysis (Figure 8). Tables 5-7 and Figures 9-11 show the remaining content of earth-alkaline metal ions in the treated PW after the filtration of the precipitated metal carbonates. After the addition of 3 g Na2CO3/200mL PW, the calcium ion concentration dropped from 11,300 ppm to 4413 ppm. After the addition of 5 g Na2CO3/200mL PW, the Ca2+ concentration in PW diminished to 1647 ppm, dropping to 84.0 ppm after the addition of 7 g Na2CO3/200mL PW. Interestingly, magnesium as the second most important earth-alkaline metal found in the studied PW is not as easily crystallized as CaCO3 so there is some separation of calcium from magnesium possible, although magnesium remains the most dominant contaminant in the precipitated CaCO3 crystals. The solubility products of calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, and strontium carbonate are 4.96 × 109, 6.82 × 106, and 5.60 × 1010, respectively [59]. Clearly, magnesium carbonate is more soluble in water than calcium carbonate, with the solubility products of the two magnesium carbonate hydrates MgCO3∙3H2O and MgCO3∙5H2O tabulated as 2.38 × 106 and 3.79 × 106, respectively [59]. Only after most of the calcium content in PW has crystallized as CaCO3 and added sodium carbonate delivers further carbonate ions does magnesium start crystallizing more abundantly (Figure 11).

Figure 8. Schematic presentation of the treatment of PW with Na2CO3 to precipitate CaCO3 and other earth-alkaline carbonates (a) addition of Na2CO3 to PW; (b) stirring of the resulting solution with precipitation ensuing; (c) filtration of solid earth alkaline carbonates; (d) drying of the solid at 37˚C in a drying cabinet; (e) ICP-analysis.

Table 5. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after addition of 3 g Na2CO3 (solid) for every 200 g PW.

Earth-alkaline ion

Abundance

Calcium (Ca2+)

4413 ppm

Magnesium (Mg2+)

2483 ppm

Strontium (Sr2+)

285.3 ppm

Table 6. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after addition of 5 g Na2CO3 (solid) for every 200 g PW.

Earth-alkaline ion

Abundance

Calcium (Ca2+)

1647 ppm

Magnesium (Mg2+)

2273 ppm

Strontium (Sr2+)

189.2 ppm

Table 7. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after addition of 7 g Na2CO3 (solid) for every 200 g PW.

Earth-alkaline ion

Abundance

Calcium (Ca2+)

84.0 ppm

Magnesium (Mg2+)

1749 ppm

Strontium (Sr2+)

19.5 ppm

Figure 9. Calcium concentration in de-oiled PW as a function of added solid Na2CO3.

Figure 10. Magnesium concentration in de-oiled PW as a function of added solid Na2CO3.

Figure 11. Strontium concentration in de-oiled PW as a function of added solid Na2CO3.

Tables 8-14 show the purity of the crystallized CaCO3 obtained under different conditions. The purity of the crystallized CaCO3 is high with the first additions of solid Na2CO3 and then drops: 94.41 w% (upon addition of 3 g Na2CO3, 89.47 w% (upon addition of 7 g Na2CO3) as also shown in Table 8, Table 10 and Table 12. The same holds true when adding a concentrated aqueous solution of Na2CO3: 92.26 w% (upon addition of conc. aq. Na2CO3 [3 g in 21 mL H2O]), 89.76 w% (upon addition of conc aq. Na2CO3 [7 g in 35 mL H2O]) as shown in Table 9 and Table 13.

Apart from magnesium, the calcium carbonate precipitate also showed a significant amount of sodium. As sodium salts are quite soluble in water, CaCO3 crystallized with 5 g solid Na2CO3/200mL PW was taken up in water (75 mL) after filtration, and the resulting slurry was stirred at 75˚C for 30 min and subsequently filtered. Interestingly, the CaCO3 precipitate before and after this treatment gave the same CaCO3 content (92.57 w% vs. 92.58 w%), as shown in Table 10 and Table 11. The authors believe that this could be due to encapsulation of sodium salts by the crystallizing CaCO3, where the sodium carbonate crystallites serve as seeding points for the crystallization, and where a concentration gradient in carbonate would be expected from the dissolving sodium carbonate crystallite outwards.

To have a more uniform concentration of carbonate throughout the solution during the crystallization process, a conc. aq. solution of Na2CO3 was added dropwise to PW in a separate series of experiments (Table 9, Table 13, and Table 14). However, the purity differences between the CaCO3 crystallized by addition of solid Na2CO3 and by addition of a concentrated aqueous solution of Na2CO3 were not markedly different (92.26 w% vs. 94.41 w%), as seen from Table 11 and Table 12. Washing of the filter cake with minimal amounts of H2O in the latter procedure did change the purity of the precipitated CaCO3 (95.48 w% purity vs. 92.58 w% purity), as can be seen in Table 13 and Table 14. Here, most likely Na2CO3 attached to the surface of the CaCO3 crystals is removed, decreasing the Na2CO3 content from 4.65 w% to 1.30 w%.

Table 8. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with 7 g solid Na2CO3 (for 200 mL PW).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

89.47 w%

K2CO3

0.047 w%

SrCO3

2.00 w%

Na2CO3

3.21 w%

MgCO3

5.26 w%

Others

0.013 w%

Table 9. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with a conc. aq. solution of Na2CO3 (7 g Na2CO3 in 35 mL H2O for 200 mL PW).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

89.76 w%

K2CO3

0.049 w%

SrCO3

1.83 w%

Na2CO3

3.09 w%

MgCO3

5.22 w%

Others

0.051 w%

Table 10. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with 5 g solid Na2CO3 (for 200 mL PW).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

92.57 w%

K2CO3

0.043 w%

SrCO3

1.51 w%

Na2CO3

1.89 w%

MgCO3

3.93 w%

Others

0.057 w%

Table 11. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with 5 g solid Na2CO3 (for 200 mL PW), then washed with hot water (75 mL, 75˚C).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

92.58 w%

K2CO3

0.032 w%

SrCO3

1.51 w%

Na2CO3

1.86 w%

MgCO3

3.93 w%

Others

0.088 w%

Table 12. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with 3 g solid Na2CO3 (for 200 mL PW).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

94.41 w%

K2CO3

0.058 w%

SrCO3

1.27 w%

Na2CO3

1.28 w%

MgCO3

2.82 w%

Others

0.162 w%

Table 13. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with a conc. aq. solution of Na2CO3 (3 g Na2CO3 in 21 mL H2O for 200 mL PW).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

92.26 w%

K2CO3

0.0833 w%

SrCO3

1.13 w%

Na2CO3

4.65 w%

MgCO3

1.84 w%

Others

0.037 w%

Table 14. Purity of CaCO3 precipitated with a conc. aq. solution of Na2CO3 (3 g Na2CO3 in 21 mL H2O for 200 mL PW), precipitate washed with H2O (50 mL).

Metal carbonate

w%

Metal carbonate

w%

CaCO3

95.48 w%

K2CO3

0.058 w%

SrCO3

1.17 w%

Na2CO3

1.30 w%

MgCO3

1.90 w%

Others

0.092 w%

Apart from being used as construction material, calcium carbonate is used in the production of paints, paper and textiles. It is also used as a filling material in plastics [60] [61] and rubber products such as tires, influencing the mechanical properties of the materials [61]. Furthermore, it finds applications in the adhesive industry and the pharmaceutical industry [62]. Also, in the oil and gas industry calcium carbonate is used as a constituent of drilling fluid [63]. The purity of calcium carbonate is an important factor in the pricing of the material, with typical prices for bulk CaCO3 for non-industrial uses in the UAE ranging from US$ 0.4/kg CaCO3 to US$ 9.6/kg CaCO3. The average import price of CaCO3 into the UAE stood at US$ 0.22/kg CaCO3 in 2022.

4. Recommendations and Outlook

The study showed that PW pe-treated with a three phase separator could be de-oiled effectively by adsorptive filtration over a mixture of activated charcoal and cellulose acetate, where the cellulosic material was obtained from spent coffee grounds, subjected to aq. NaOH extraction and bleaching. The effectiveness of the sorbent material was similar to that derived from non-bleached cellulosic material from SCGs. As the bleaching process only gives a yield of 55.5% and the bleaching itself and subsequent thorough washing of the bleached cellulosic material leads to added liquid waste, the recommendation is to obviate the bleaching process. The authors tried to use leaves of the desert gourd (Citrullus colocynthis) as source of cellulosic material. The leaves were dried, extracted with ethanol, subsequently with aq. NaOH and finally bleached. The acetylation of the material with acetyl chloride in N,N-dimethylacetamide in the presence of pyridine did not lead to fully acetylated cellulose. Therefore, the material was foregone as sorbent for the adsorptive filtration of PW. This, however, does not preclude using other esterified biomass material in the future.

After the de-oiling process, PW was subjected to the addition of Na2CO3 with which CaCO3 precipitated from the solution. Here, it was noted that the purity of the precipitated CaCO3 diminished with a continued addition of Na2CO3. Therefore, it is advisable to carry out the precipitation of CaCO3 from PW in batches, where a high purity of CaCO3 is maintained with the addition of up to about 43w% of the amount needed to complete the precipitation of the CaCO3 present in the PW.

While the above results are promising, it is important to look at a scale-up of the overall process in the near future.

5. Conclusion

PW from an oil and gas operation situated in South Kuwait that was pre-treated with a three-phase separator was de-oiled by adsorptive filtration. Thereafter, the earth-alkaline metal ions were removed from the filtrate by precipitation as carbonates. Calcium carbonate with a purity as high as 95.48 w% could be obtained from the de-oiled PW by precipitation upon addition of Na2CO3. Together with the industrial salt (NaCl) that can be obtained in a purity of 99.2 w%, as communicated in an earlier publication, the possibility of attaining CaCO3 in a purity of 95.5 w% during the purification of PW contributes to the potential of making the treatment of PW from oil and gas a financially sustainable operation by generating products of commercial value.

Acknowledgements

Part of this research was supported financially by UAEU grant SDG-G0004110. The authors thank CCIC Middle East FZE - Fujairah Branch for the ICP-OES measurements to determine the cation content of the crystallized salt.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Igunnu, E.T. and Chen, G.Z. (2014) Produced Water Treatment Technologies. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 9, 157-177. [CrossRef]
[2] Kusworo, T.D., Aryanti, N., Qudratun and Utomo, D.P. (2018) Oilfield Produced Water Treatment to Clean Water Using Integrated Activated Carbon-Bentonite Adsorbent and Double Stages Membrane Process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 347, 462-471. [CrossRef]
[3] Patni, H. and Ragunathan, B. (2023) Recycling and Re-Usage of Oilfield Produced Water-A Review. Materialstoday: Proceedings, 77, 307-313. [CrossRef]
[4] Jiménez, S.B., Micó, M.M., Arnaldos, M., Medina, F. and Contreras, S. (2018) State of the Art of Produced Water Treatment. Chemosphere, 192, 186-208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Salem, F. and Thiemann, T. (2022) Produced Water from Oil and Gas Exploration—Problems, Solutions and Opportunities. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 14, 142-185. [CrossRef]
[6] Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L.C., Biak, D.R.A., Madaeni, S.S. and Abidin, Z.Z. (2009) Review of Technologies for Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, 530-551. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Hedar, Y. and Budiyono. (2018) Pollution Impact and Alternative Treatment for Produced Water. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, Article 03004. [CrossRef]
[8] Allen, R.M. and Robinson, K. (1993) Environmental Aspects of Produced Water Disposal. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, 3-6 April 1993, 25549. [CrossRef]
[9] Gazali, A.K., Alkali, A.N., Mohammed, Y., Djauro, Y., Dahir, M.D. and Kodomi, M. (2017) Environmental Impact of Produced Water and Drilling Waste Discharges from the Niger Delta Petroleum Industry. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 7, 22-29.
https://www.iosrjen.org/Papers/vol7_issue6/Version-1/D0706012229.pdf
[10] Neff, J., Lee, K., DeBlois, E.M. (2011) Produced Water: Overview of Composition, Fates, and Effects. In: Lee, K., Neff, J., Eds, Produced Water. Springer. [CrossRef]
[11] Pichtel, J. (2016) Oil and Gas Production Wastewater: Soil Contamination and Pollution Prevention. Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, 2016, Article ID: 2707989. [CrossRef]
[12] Salem, F., Poulose, V., Kawamura, K., Nakamura, A., Saibi, H. and Thiemann, T. (2023) Effects of the Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait on the Production Tubing. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 15, 358-375. [CrossRef]
[13] Kamshad, T., Al-Ghamdi, A.R., Siritri, R.S. and Kellow, D. (2016) Risk Assessment for Implementation of Chemical Treatment Programs on Production Wells within the Wafra Oilfield Partition Zone (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait). CORROSION 2016, Vancouver, 6-10 March 2016, 7115.
https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR16/All-CORR16/NACE-2016-7115/123448
[14] Al-Hashem, A., Carew, J.A. and Al-Sayegh, A. (2000) The Effects of Water-Cut on the Corrosion Behavior L80 Carbon Steel under Downhole Conditions. CORROSION 2000, Orlando, 10-14 March 2000, 00061.
https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR00/All-CORR00/NACE-00061/111962
[15] Scott, P.J.B., Al-Hashem, A. and Carew, J.A. (2007) Experiments on MIC of Steel and FRP Downhole Tubulars in West Kuwait Brines. CORROSION 2007, Nashville, 11-15 March 2007, 07113.
https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR07/All-CORR07/NACE-07113/126604
[16] Sun, W., Pugh, D.V., Ling, S., Reddy, R.V, Pacheco, J.L., Nisbet, R.S., Nor, N.M., Kersey, M.S. and Morshidi, L. (2011) Understanding and Quantifying Corrosion of L80 Carbon Steel in Sour Environments. CORROSION 2011, Houston, 11-15 March 2011, 11063.
https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR11/All-CORR11/NACE-11063/120595
[17] Smith, S. (2015) Current Understanding of Corrosion Mechanisms Due to H2S in Oil and Gas Production Environments. CORROSION 2015, Dallas, 15-19 March 2015, 5845.
https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR15/All-CORR15/NACE-2015-5485/123229
[18] Li, Z.Y., Liao, W., Wu, W., Du, C. and Li, X. (2017) Failure Analysis of Leakage Caused by Perforation in an L415 Steel Gas Pipeline. Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis, 9, 63-70. [CrossRef]
[19] Li, X.G., Zhang, D.W., Liu, Z.Y., Du, C. and Dong, C. (2015) Materials Science: Share Corrosion Data. Nature, 527, 441-442. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Nath, F., Chowdhury, M.O.S. and Rahman, M.M. (2023) Navigating Produced Water Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Critical Review of Reuse Challenges, Treatment Technologies, and Prospects Ahead. Water, 15, Article 4088. [CrossRef]
[21] Castro, P. and Huber, M.E. (2023) Marine Biology. 12th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education.
[22] Al Salem, F., Al Shamsi, H., Alaryani, M., Khalaf, B., Elsheikh, O., Poulose, V., Al Jasem, Y. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 1. Oil-Water Separation and Industrial Salt Production. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 16, 156-180. [CrossRef]
[23] Kristjánsson, I. (1992) Commercial Production of Salt from Geothermal Brine at Reykjanes, Iceland. Geothermics, 21, 765-771. [CrossRef]
[24] Vieira, M. (1951) Sal comum-a técnica das marinhas, Livraria Sá da Costa.
[25] Rodrigues, C.M., Bio, A., Amat, F. and Viera, N. (2011) Artisanal Salt Production in Aveiro/Portugal—An Ecofriendly Process. Saline Systems, 7, Article No. 3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Cipollina, A., Misseri, A., D’Alì Staiti, G., Galia, A., Micale, G. and Scialdone, O. (2012) Integrated Production of Fresh Water, Sea Salt and Magnesium from Sea Water. Desalination and Water Treatment, 49, 390-403. [CrossRef]
[27] Al Bazedi, G. Ettouney, R.S., Tewfik, S.R., Sorour, M.H. and El-Rifai, M.A. (2014) Salt Recovery from Brine Generated by Large-Scale Seawater Desalination Plants. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 4689-4697. [CrossRef]
[28] Vassallo, F., La Corte, D., Cancilla, N., Tamburini, A., Bevacqua, M., Cipollina, A. and Micale, G. (2021) A Pilot-Plant for the Selective Recovery of Magnesium and Calcium from Waste Brines. Desalination, 517, Article 115231. [CrossRef]
[29] Tanaka, Y., Ehara, R., Itoi, S. and Goto, T. (2003) Ion-Exchange Membrane Electrodialytic Salt Production Using Brine Discharged from a Reverse Osmosis Seawater Desalination Plant. Journal of Membrane Science, 222, 71-86. [CrossRef]
[30] Ramasamy, B. (2020) Short Review of Salt Recovery from Reverse Osmosis Rejects, IntechOpen. [CrossRef]
[31] Reig, M., Casas, S., Aladjem, C., Valderrama, C., Gibert, O., Valero, F., Centeno, C.M., Larrotcha, E. and Cortina, J.L. (2014) Concentration of NaCl from Seawater Reverse Osmosis Brines for the Chlor-Alkali Industry by Electrodialysis. Desalination, 342, 107-117. [CrossRef]
[32] Stewart, M. (2008) Three-Phase Oil and Water Separators. In: Stewart, M. and Arnold, K., Eds., Gas-liquid and Liquid-Liquid Separators, Gulf Professional Publishing, 131-174.
[33] Han, Y., He, L., Luo, X., Lü, Y., Kaiyue, S., Chen, J. and Huang, X. (2017) A Review of the Recent Advances in Design of Corrugated Plate Packs Applied for Oil-Water Separation. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 53, 37-50. [CrossRef]
[34] Young, G.A.B., Wakley, W.D., Taggart, D.L., Andrews, S.L. and Worrell, J.R. (1994) Oil-Water Separation Using Hydrocyclones: An Experimental Search for Optimum Dimensions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 11, 37-50. [CrossRef]
[35] Bennett, G.F. and Peters, R.W. (1988) The Removal of Oil from Wastewater by Air Flotation: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 18, 189-253. [CrossRef]
[36] Skalak, K.J., Engle, M.A., Rowan, E.L. Jolly, G.D., Conko, K.M., Benthem, A.J. and Kraemer, T.F. (2014) Surface Disposal of Produced Waters in Western and Southwestern Pennsylvania: Potential for Accumulation of Alkali-Earth Elements in Sediments. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126, 162-170. [CrossRef]
[37] Kothawade, T.R. and Naik, S.J. (2023) Reuse of Produced Water as Injection Water. Materialstoday: Proceedings, 77, 168-175. [CrossRef]
[38] Suhane, S., Dewan, R. and Mohaimin, R. (2022) Potential Use of Treated Produced Water in Irrigation: A Review. In: Siddiqui, N.A., Tauseef, S.M., Abbasi, S.A., Dobhal, R. and Kansal, A., Eds., Advances in Sustainable Development, Springer, 87-100. [CrossRef]
[39] Echchelh, A., Hess, T. and Sakrabani, R. (2018) Reusing Oil and Gas Produced Water for Irrigation of Food Crops in Drylands. Agricultural Water Management, 206, 124-134. [CrossRef]
[40] Echchelh, A., Hess, T., Sakrabani, R., Prigent, S. and Stefanakis, A.I. (2021) Towards Agro-Environmentally Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Produced Water in Hyper-Arid Environments. Agricultural Water Management, 243, Article 106449. [CrossRef]
[41] Mondal, S. and Wickramasinghe, S.R. (2008) Produced Water Treatment by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Journal of Membrane Separation, 322, 162-170. [CrossRef]
[42] Zsirai, T., Qiblawey, H., Buzatu, P., Al-Marri, M. and Judd, S.J. (2018) Cleaning of Ceramic Membranes for Produced Water Filtration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 166, 283-289. [CrossRef]
[43] Youssef, R., Qiblawey, H. and El-Naas, M. (2020) Adsorption as a Process for Produced Water Treatment: A Review. Processes, 8, Article 1657. [CrossRef]
[44] Choi, Y., Kim, Y., Woo, Y.C. and Hwang, I. (2023) Water Management and Produced Water Treatment in Oil Sand Plant: A Review. Desalination, 567, Article 116991. [CrossRef]
[45] Miranda, M.A., Ghosh, A., Mahmodi, G., Xie, S., Shaw, M., Kim, S., Krzmarzick, M.J., Lampert, D.J. and Aichele, C.P. (2022) Treatment and Recovery of High-Value Elements from Produced Water. Water, 14, Article 880. [CrossRef]
[46] Salem, F. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Variability in Quantity and Salinity of Produced Water from Oil Production in South Kuwait. Engineering, 16, 8-23. [CrossRef]
[47] Salem, F., Thiemann, T., Kawamura, K., Nakamura, A., Poulose, V. and Saibi, H. (2024) Purification of Produced Water from Kuwaiti Oil Fields Using Ceramic Membranes. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dhahran, 12 February 2024, 24571. [CrossRef]
[48] Salem, F. (2024) Produced Water Management from Production Sites in the State of Kuwait. Ph.D. Thesis, United Arab Emirates University.
[49] Shi, C., Chen, Y., Yu, Z., Li, S., Chan, H., Sun, S., Chen, G., He, M. and Tian, J. (2021) Sustainable and Super Hydrophobic Spent Coffee Ground-Derived Holocellulose Nanofibers Foam for Continuous Oil/Water Separation. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 28, e00277. [CrossRef]
[50] Lee, K.-T., Cheng, C.-L., Lee, D.-S., Chen, W.-H., Vo, D.-V.N., Ding, L. and Lam, S.S. (2022) Spent Coffee Grounds Biochar from Torrefaction as a Potential Adsorbents for Spilled Diesel Oil Recovery and as an Alternative Fuel. Energy, 239, Article 122467. [CrossRef]
[51] Koutsoukos, P.G. and Kontoyannis, C.G. (1984) Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate in Aqueous Solutions. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, 80, 1181-1192. [CrossRef]
[52] Söhnel, O. and Mullin, J.W. (1982) Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate. Journal of Crystal Growth, 60, 239-250. [CrossRef]
[53] Kitamura, M., Konno, H., Yasui, A. and Masuoka, H. (2002) Controlling Factors and Mechanism of Reactive Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate Polymorphs from Calcium Hydroxide Suspensions. Journal of Crystal Growth, 236, 323-332. [CrossRef]
[54] Wen, Y., Xiang, L. and Jin, Y. (2003) Synthesis of Plate-Like Calcium Carbonate via Carbonation Route. Materials Letters, 57, 2565-2571. [CrossRef]
[55] Grimes, C.J., Hardcastle, T., Manga, M.S., Mahmud, T. and York, D.W. (2020) Calcium Carbonate Particle Formation through Precipitation in a Stagnant Bubble and a Bubble Column Reactor. Crystal Growth & Design, 20, 5572-5582. [CrossRef]
[56] Han, S.-J., Yoo, M., Kim, D.W. and Wee, J.-H. (2011) Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Calcium Hydroxide Aqueous Solution as the Absorbent. Energy Fuels, 25, 3825-3834. [CrossRef]
[57] Hadiko, G., Han, Y.S., Fuji, M. and Takahashi, M. (2005) Synthesis of Hollow Calcium Carbonate Particles by the Bubble Templating Method. Materials Letters, 59, 2519-2522. [CrossRef]
[58] El-Sheikh, S., El-Sherbiny, S., Barhoum, A. and Deng, Y. (2013) Effects of Cationic Surfactant during the Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate Nano-Particles on Their Size, Morphology, and Other Characteristics. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 422, 44-49. [CrossRef]
[59] Chang, J.C. (1990) Solubility Product Constants. In: Lide, D.R., Ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, 8-39.
[60] Lin, Y. and Chan, C.-M. (2012) 3-Calcium Carbonate Nanocomposites. In: Gao, F., Ed., Advances in Polymer Nanocomposites, Woodhead Publishing, 55-90. [CrossRef]
[61] Fang, Q., Song, B., Tee, T.T., Sin, L.-T., Hui, D., and Bee, S.-T. (2014) Investigation of Dynamic Characteristics of Nano-Size Calcium Carbonate Added in Natural Rubber Vulcanizate. Composites Part B: Engineering, 60, 561-567. [CrossRef]
[62] Al Omari, M.M.H., Rashid, I.S., Qinna, N.A., Jaber, A.M. and Badwan, A.A. (2016) In: Brittain, H.G., Ed., Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology, Academic Press, 31-132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Villada, Y., Busatto, C., Casis, N. and Estenoz, D. (2022) Use of Synthetic Calcium Carbonate Particles as an Additive in Water-Based Drilling Fluids. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 652, Article 129801. [CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.