<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jwarp
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Water Resource and Protection
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    1945-3094
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    1945-3108
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jwarp.2024.167026
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jwarp-134392
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 2. Oil-Water Separation and Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Feras Al
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Salem
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Najood
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Almansoori
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hanifa
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       AlBalooshi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nouf
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Alshehhi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Maitha
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Almheiri
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Vijo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Poulose
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Thies
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Thiemann
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Chemistry, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     09
    </day> 
    <month>
     07
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    07
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    467
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    488
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      25,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      6,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      6,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Oil-water separation for produced water (PW) originating from an oil extraction site in South Kuwait was carried out using bleached, esterified cellulosic material from used coffee grounds. Thereafter, earth-alkaline metal ions, specifically calcium ions, of the de-oiled PW were removed by precipitation with sodium carbonate to give access to pure sodium chloride as industrial salt from the remaining PW. While the purity of the precipitated calcium carbonate (CaCO
    <sub>3</sub>) depends on the precipitation conditions, CaCO
    <sub>3</sub> of up to 95.48% purity can be obtained, which makes it a salable product. The precipitation of CaCO
    <sub>3</sub> decreases the amount of calcium ions in PW from 11,300 ppm to 84 ppm.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Produced Water
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Oil and Gas
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Bleached Biomass
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Adsorption Filtration
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Crystallization of Calcium Chloride
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Produced water (PW) is an appreciable side product of oil and gas operations, amounting to 250 million barrels per day in 2020 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. It is predicted to reach 650 million barrels per day within the next 2 decades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-3">
     [3]
    </xref> due to the continuous maturing of the exploited oil fields and due to the development of new fields. At the moment, the global average PW to oil ratio is 7 barrels of PW for every barrel of oil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. PW is a very complex fluid and carries varying concentrations of metal salts and hydrocarbons as well as additives that the operators have added for a more perfect oil/gas extraction operation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. If released to the environment directly, PW is a potent environmental pollutant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-7">
     [7]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Also, PW is highly corrosive, damaging pipelines and general infrastructure of oil/gas operations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-12">
     [12]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-19">
     [19]
    </xref> If the effort is undertaken to purify PW and separate it into its components, namely into the water, sodium salt (mostly NaCl), earth-alkaline salts (mostly calcium salts, in form of calcium carbonate) and residual oil, PW can be seen as a significant resource of water, salt and a remaining hydrocarbon fraction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, where the salts need to be separated into sodium and calcium salts for their commercial use.</p>
   <fig-group id="fig1" position="float">
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 1. (a) Major ion content in seawater. Data taken from [21]; (b) Salt content with major ions in PW from an oil and gas operation in South Kuwait (average over 3 samplings within 2 years) [22 and current study].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId13.jpeg?20240808013909" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 1. (a) Major ion content in seawater. Data taken from [21]; (b) Salt content with major ions in PW from an oil and gas operation in South Kuwait (average over 3 samplings within 2 years) [22 and current study].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId14.jpeg?20240808013909" />
    </fig>
   </fig-group>
   <p>Figure 1. (a) Major ion content in seawater. Data taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-21">
     [21]
    </xref>; (b) Salt content with major ions in PW from an oil and gas operation in South Kuwait (average over 3 samplings within 2 years) [22 and current study].</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1(a)">
     Figure 1(a)
    </xref>and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1(b)">
     Figure 1(b)
    </xref>, respectively, show the average salt contents of seawater and of PW from the SK oilfield under study in this work. It can be noted that the sodium ion (Na<sup>+</sup>) and chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>) concentrations in PW are 4.25 and 4.80 times those of the average saltwater. In the PW under study, the calcium ion (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) content is 24.2 times that of average seawater, where calcium is the second most abundant metal cation after sodium, but before magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>). Nevertheless, the magnesium concentration in PW is 1.91 times that in average seawater. Salt production from seawater as well as from other naturally occurring brines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-23">
     [23]
    </xref> has been known for a long time, going back to the Phoenicians in the 9<sup>th</sup> century BC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-24">
     [24]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. In recent times, desalination to procure fresh water has been combined to obtain salt from the rejected brine in evaporation ponds, too <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-26">
     [26]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. Salt production has also been achieved by rejecting brines of reverse osmosis processes, for instance in sea-water desalination plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-29">
     [29]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-31">
     [31]
    </xref>. In comparison, salt reclamation from PW of oil and gas operations is being carried out more seldomly.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref> shows schematically the possibilities of purifying PW from oil and gas operations. The commercial products that can be derived from PW during the purification steps are highlighted in orange. Usually, the first step for the purification of produced water (PW) from oil and gas extraction processes is its separation into oil, gas and water with the help of a three-phase separator <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-32">
     [32]
    </xref>, before further oil separation from the water is carried out by corrugated plate interceptor (cpi) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-33">
     [33]
    </xref>, hydro cyclone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-34">
     [34]
    </xref>, and possibly air flotation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-35">
     [35]
    </xref>. Sometimes, such as is the case in the oil extraction operation in South Kuwait the PW of which is the subject of the current study, the pre-treated PW is disposed of underground, in so-called disposal wells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-36">
     [36]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In cases where PW is to be used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-37">
     [37]
    </xref>, for cooling or irrigation purposes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-38">
     [38]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-40">
     [40]
    </xref>, it needs to undergo further purification. Membrane filtration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-41">
     [41]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-42">
     [42]
    </xref> or filtration through a sorbent layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-43">
     [43]
    </xref> that may include sand <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-44">
     [44]
    </xref> can be added to the purification scheme, depending on the further use of the PW.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Schematic layout of the purification steps for PW from oil and gas operations. The processes within the red box are the focus of this work.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId15.jpeg?20240808013909" />
   </fig>
   <p>Looking at the salt reclamation from PW, both calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) and sodium chloride (NaCl) are valuable commodities. The extraction of other metal salts such as lithium, vanadium and neodymium salts would be highly lucrative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-45">
     [45]
    </xref>, but for operations of this type existing technology would need to be developed further. It must be kept in mind that currently treatment of PW is not profitable or sustainable as a business model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-45">
     [45]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The majority of produced water (PW) from an oilfield in South Kuwait undergoes a primary oil-water separation process based on gravity separation and is subsequently disposed of in disposal wells. The space in the disposal wells is limited and the drilling of new disposal wells is costly. In addition, PW has been shown to do significant damage to the production infrastructure as it is highly corrosive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Efforts have been made to come up with a sustainable solution for the PW of this oilfield, which involves more stringent treatment of the PW with concomitant extraction and separation of commercially valuable constituents from it. The oil-field is a mature field with a water cut of 1:4. Production from 40 - 60 different wells is combined to supply a central processing substation. The total field is comprised of over 1000 wells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Recently, we have reported that the composition of PW from an oil field can vary, even over short periods of time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-46">
     [46]
    </xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableTables 1-3">
     Tables 1-3
    </xref> show the average compositions of three PW samples used in this and a previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
     [22]
    </xref> that were taken over a period of three years. Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations varied between 35,600 and 51,500 ppm, Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentrations between 7670 and 11,300 ppm, and Mg<sup>2+</sup> concentrations between 1730 and 3050 ppm.</p>
   <p>The proposed purification of PW from the South Kuwaiti oilfield entails, apart from the existing pre-treatment by gravity separation, membrane filtration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-47">
     [47]
    </xref> and an adsorptive filtration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
     [22]
    </xref> to separate the remaining oil from the water. Subsequently, the calcium of PW is separated out by precipitation as CaCO<sub>3</sub>. Thereafter, the water is separated from the remaining salt content, mostly NaCl, by either solar pond distillation or reverse osmosis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>). Most of these steps have been detailed in earlier communications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-47">
     [47]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-48">
     [48]
    </xref>, where the adsorptive filtration cellulosic material from used coffee grounds (SCG) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-49">
     [49]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-50">
     [50]
    </xref> is utilized, which has been treated with aq. NaOH to separate lignin from the cellulose of the coffee grounds. It must be noted that the price that could be obtained both for the industrial salt (NaCl) and for the precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub> is an integral part of the financial sustainability of the entire PW treatment process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-48">
     [48]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The processes shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref> within the red box are the focus of this work, where the current contribution primarily deals with purity considerations in regard to the precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub>, where CaCO<sub>3</sub> is precipitated from the PW under different conditions. Also, the authors tried to find out whether it would be better to bleach the SCG before esterification to give a good sorbent material. Thirdly, the authors attempted to utilize leaf material from desert squash (Citrullus colocynthis) as a cellulose source that after esterification could also be used as sorbent material in the adsorptive oil-water separation process.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 1. Properties and ion content of PW-1, sourced from an oil production in South Kuwait collected in November 2021—This PW was treated with SDG-octanoate/AC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-21">
       [21]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Total dissolved solids</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">132,780 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">75,660 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">35,600 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Sulfate ( 
        <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
          <mi>
            S 
          </mi> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             O 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
           <mrow> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
          </msubsup> 
         </mrow> 
        </math>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">18 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Potassium (K<sup>+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">1520 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Bicarbonate ( 
        <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
          <mi>
            H 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             O 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
          </msubsup> 
         </mrow> 
        </math>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">140 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">7670 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Silicon (Si)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">12.3 ppm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">1730 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Total Iron (Fe)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">1.36 ppm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Barium (Ba<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2.3 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Dissolved oxygen</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">3 ppm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">255 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">pH at 25˚C</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">6.88</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 2. Properties and ion content of PW-2, sourced from the same oil production site in South Kuwait in January 2022, 3 months after PW-1—This PW was treated either with SDG-palmitate/AC or with SDG-acetate/AC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
       [22]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Total dissolved solids</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">193,350 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">110,090 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">51,500 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Sulfate ( 
        <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
          <mi>
            S 
          </mi> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             O 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
           <mrow> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
          </msubsup> 
         </mrow> 
        </math>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">355 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Potassium (K<sup>+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1800 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Bicarbonate ( 
        <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
          <mi>
            H 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             O 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
          </msubsup> 
         </mrow> 
        </math>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">300 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">11,200 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Silicon (Si)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">ND</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">3050 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Total Iron (Fe)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">ND</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Barium (Ba<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.4 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Dissolved oxygen</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">ND</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">460 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">pH at 25˚C</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">6.02</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 3. Ion content of PW-3, sourced from the same oil production site in South Kuwait as in ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
       [22]
      </xref>, after treatment with bleached SDG-acetate/AC [this work]. PW3 was collected in February 2024.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">49.600 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.71%"><p style="text-align:center">416 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Potassium (K<sup>+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2192 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Aluminum (Al<sup>3+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.30 pm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">11,300 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Cobalt (Co), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.71%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.1 ppm</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2676 ppm</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Total Iron (Fe)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.71%"><p style="text-align:center">ND</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. General</title>
    <p>8.5 L of a produced water (PW) sample was obtained from an oil extraction operation in South Kuwait. The PW had been submitted to oil-water separation with a three-way separator and with corrugated plate interceptors. Nevertheless, it still carried appreciable amounts of hydrocarbons. Spent coffee grounds (SCGs) were obtained from a selection of commercially available coffee brands. Pyridine (BDH) was dried over solid KOH and N, N-dimethylacetamide (Sigma Aldrich) was dried over MgSO<sub>4</sub>. Acetyl chloride (Sigma Aldrich) was used without further purification. Commercial Clorox® was used as bleaching agent. It had a sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) content of 3.5 w%. Potassium hydroxide (KOH pellets, Sigma Aldrich), sodium hydroxide (NaOH pellets, BDH Analr), anhydrous sodium carbonate (soda, eurolab), activated charcoal (Sigma Aldrich, acid-washed with hydrochloric acid), hexane (Panreac) and dichloromethane (CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>, Sigma Aldrich) were used as is. Water used to make solutions and to wash the precipitated salts was AlAinwater® of drinking water quality.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Torrefaction of SCGs was carried out in a Carbolite oven. Post-reaction, samples were dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet. Reaction mixtures were stirred on WiseStir magnetic stirrers. The ash contents of the commercial activated charcoal (AC), SCG, the hydroxide extracted SCG, the bleached SCG as well as the bleached SCG-ester were determined by heating respective samples in crucibles (79C-00, Waldenwanger, Berlin) in a Carbolite oven at 600˚C for 3 h, where the mass of the resulting ash is expressed as weight % of the originally weighed-in sample. The preparation of the SCG material used as the starting material for the bleaching process was described previously <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
      [22]
     </xref>. The ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy) analyses of the salt crystals were carried out by CCIC Middle East FZE-Fujairah Branch. The laboratory is accredited. For the ICP-OES measurements, an Agilent ICP-OES Model-5110 was used after the digestion of the samples with HNO<sub>3</sub> in a microwave digestor. Infrared spectra of the SCG materials and the derived esterified cellulosic materials were carried out as KBr pellets with a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 2 FT-IR spectrometer. TOC measurements were performed with a Shimadzu TOC-4200.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Preparation of the Bleached Cellulosic Sorbent Material from Spent Coffee Grounds</title>
    <p>To a suspension of hydroxide extracted and dried SCG (10 g) in H<sub>2</sub>O (150 mL) was given Clorox® (50 mL) and the resulting mixture was stirred for 5 h at rt. Thereafter, the mixture was filtered through a sintered glass filter. Thereafter, the filter cake was transferred to a metal sieve with a mesh size of 125 μm, and the obtained mass was thoroughly washed with 3 × 25 mL H<sub>2</sub>O and dried for 10 h at 37˚C. Yield 5.55 g. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>)</p>
    <p>Coffee grounds (extracted with NaOH, non-sieved, 1.0 g, 6.15 mmol, one cellulose unit, bleached) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and dimethylacetamide (35 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine (2.6 g, 32.5 mmol) and acetyl chloride (2.0 g, 25.0 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 3 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 150 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the esters). The ensuing mixture was separated through a sintered glass funnel by vacuum filtration. The filter cake was then washed with dichloromethane (30 mL) and hexane (30 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C. (Yield = 1.11 g).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Sequence used to obtain bleached cellulosic material from SCG, adapted from ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-49">
        [49]
       </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-50">
        [50]
       </xref>. The preparation of cellulosic material from SCG has also been described elsewhere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
        [22]
       </xref>.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId23.jpeg?20240808013911" />
    </fig>
    <p>Crushed leaves of Citrullus colocynthis (extracted with ethanol and with aq. NaOH, bleached, 1.0 g, 6.15 mmol, one cellulose unit) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and dimethylacetamide (35 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine (2.6 g, 32.5 mmol) and acetyl chloride (2.0 g, 25.0 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 3 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 150 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the esters). The ensuing mixture was separated through a sintered glass funnel by vacuum filtration. The filter cake was then washed with dichloromethane (30 mL) and hexane (30 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C (Yield = 1.10 g).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Oil-Water Separation by Adsorptive Filtration on Bleached SCG-Acetate</title>
    <p>For the adsorptive filtration of PW, a glass column (length 35 cm, inner diameter 1.70 cm) was used. The column was filled with a well-mixed sorbent mixture of cellulose acetate (1.20 g) and activated carbon (3.60 g, 1:3 w/w). Sand (30 g) was added as a protective layer to the top of the sorptive material. The column was run with 1 atm pressure, initially at 500 mL per day. The de-oiled water was collected in plastic jerry cans, which thereafter were closed. PW (8.5 L) was filtered through the column. TOC measurements of the filtered PW were performed with a Shimadzu TOC-4200. The TOC of the filtered water was measured to be below 50 ppm. The metal cationic content of the filtered PW was determined by ICP-OES and is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Salt Crystallization from De-Oiled PW</title>
    <p>1) At room temperature, solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (7.00 g) was added within 30 sec. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was washed with H<sub>2</sub>O (50 mL) and subsequently dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C (14 h) to give a white crystalline solid, (yield: 5.83 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.</p>
    <p>2) At room temperature, solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (5.00 g) was added dropwise within 30 sec. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was washed with H<sub>2</sub>O (50 mL) and subsequently dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C (14 h) to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 4.95 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.</p>
    <p>3) At room temperature, solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (3.00 g) was added dropwise within 30 sec. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was washed with H<sub>2</sub>O (50 mL) and subsequently dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C (14 h) to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 2.56 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.</p>
    <p>4) At room temperature, an aqueous solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (7.00 g in 50 mL H<sub>2</sub>O) was added dropwise within 5 min. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 5.77 g). This experiment was repeated with the difference that the filter cake was washed with H<sub>2</sub>O (50 mL) to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 5.75 g). The filtrate and washings were kept separate, where the filtrate was analyzed further.</p>
    <p>5) At room temperature, an aqueous solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (5.00 g in 35 mL H<sub>2</sub>O) was added dropwise within 5 min. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 4.91 g).</p>
    <p>6) At room temperature, an aqueous solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (3.00 g in 21 mL H<sub>2</sub>O) was added dropwise within 5 min. to stirred de-oiled PW (200 mL). The mixture was stirred for a further 10 min. at rt and then filtered through a glass filter. The filter cake was dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet to give a white crystalline solid (yield: 2.47 g).</p>
    <p>The samples from experiments 1.4.1.1-1.4.1.3 and 2.4.1.1-2.4.1.3 were stored in small plastic containers and sent within the week of the experiment to CCIC, Fujairah, for ICP analysis.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Oil and Water Separation by Adsorptive Filtration</title>
    <p>The preparation of non-bleached, torrified (treated) SCG had been published previously <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-22">
      [22]
     </xref>, see also ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-49">
      [49]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-50">
      [50]
     </xref>. The subsequent bleaching of the SCG was achieved easily by the addition of commercial Clorox® to a suspension of treated SCG. That reaction could be made out visually by the significant lightening of the color of the material. After stirring the mixture for 5h rt, it was filtered through a glass filter. Filtration proved to be slow, and the material needed to be washed copiously. For this, the material was transferred to a 125 μm metal sieve. Very often, organic materials have inorganic salts incorporated or adhering to the surface. A measure of the inorganic content of the material is the ash content, where the material is heated to 600˚C and the organic material is combusted, leaving the inorganics as ash. Here, it can be seen that the treatment of organic material with inorganic salts can contaminate the surface of the material, where the adhering inorganic salts cannot be removed completely by successive washings. In this regard, the ash content of the SCG material was measured after each treatment. At the outset, SCG, after torrefaction, had an ash content of 1.11 ± 0.06 w% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>). The ash content of SCG increased significantly to 10.96 ± 1.23 w% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>) after basic extraction of the material with aq. NaOH to remove the lignin fraction from the material. Here, it could be imagined that sodium ions still remain with the extracted SCG. After the bleaching process, the ash content of the material halved to 4.48 ± 0.28 w% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>), most likely due to successive washings. Interestingly, the subsequent esterification of the bleached SCG decreased the ash content to a negligible level (0.45 ± 0.03 w%, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>), indicating the ash content of the extracted SCG most likely is due to sodium ions associated with hydroxy groups of the sugar units of the cellulosic material. The esterification of these hydroxy groups releases the sodium ions. The commercial-activated AC was found to have an ash content of 8.00 ± 0.16 w%.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Infrared spectrum of bleached SCG.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId24.jpeg?20240808013912" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Esterification of cellulose with acetyl chloride in the presence of pyridine.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId25.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
    <p>As a second source of cellulosic sorption material, the authors looked at the leaves of Citrullus colocynthis, a vine plant that grows on arid lands. It is known under a number of names such as Abu Jahl’s melon, colocynth, bitter apple and the vine of Sodom. In the UAE, it is also called the desert gourd or desert squash. Citrullus colocynthis leaves were collected in Tohwayya Wadi, Al Ain. The leaves were washed and subsequently dried for two weeks at rt and crushed in a mortar. Thereafter, they were stirred in ethanol to extract small organic molecules including chlorophyll. Then, the leaves were dried at 37˚C. Thereafter, they were subjected to basic extraction of the material with aq. NaOH to remove the lignin fraction from the cellulosic material (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>). Thereafter, the leaves were heated to 200˚C and ground. They were bleached with an aq. solution of Clorox®, filtered and washed with water. Subsequently, they were dried at 120˚C over 16 h. Finally, they were submitted to esterification with acetyl chloride (AcCl). The IR spectral data showed an incomplete esterification of the material (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>). Therefore, the material was submitted to a second esterification under the same conditions, however, it could be noted that esterification of all hydroxy functions of the cellulosic material could not be achieved. Therefore, further studies with this material were not carried out.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Cellulosic material from leaves of Citrullus colocynthis after extraction with ethanol (EtOH) and subsequently with aq. NaOH.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId26.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Partially acetylated cellulosic material from leaves of Citrullus colocynthis.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId27.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Precipitation of Earth-Alkaline Metal Ions from Produced Water - Effect of the Precipitation Method on the Purity of the Precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub></title>
    <p>A number of papers have been reported on the crystallization of CaCO<sub>3</sub> from aqueous solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-51">
      [51]
     </xref>, including in the presence of other ions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-52">
      [52]
     </xref>. Crystallization can be induced by a liquid-liquid system where both Ca<sup>2+</sup> and 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         C 
       </mi> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mi>
          O 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </msubsup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> ions are present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-53">
      [53]
     </xref> or by the gas-liquid system where carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is bubbled through a solution of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> or CaCl<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-54">
      [54]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-56">
      [56]
     </xref> in the presence of ammonium hydroxide or amine-containing solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-57">
      [57]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-58">
      [58]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In the current study, the de-oiled PW which had been filtered through a column of AC and bleached SCG-Ac, was treated with either solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> or a concentrated aqueous solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. The major concentrations of earth-alkaline cation in the PW before the treatment with Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 4. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after de-oiling by adsorptive filtration over bleached SCG-OAc/AC.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Earth-alkaline ion</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Abundance</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">11300 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2676 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">416 pm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>In the first series of experiments, solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (3 g, 5 g, 7 g, all for 200 mL PW) was added to PW within 30 seconds. The precipitate formed was filtered after 10 min., washed with H<sub>2</sub>O (50 mL) and dried over 37˚C. Filtrate and washings were kept separate, Thereafter, the cationic composition of the precipitated salt was obtained by ICP-OES analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableTables 5-7">
      Tables 5-7
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 9-11">
      Figures 9-11
     </xref> show the remaining content of earth-alkaline metal ions in the treated PW after the filtration of the precipitated metal carbonates. After the addition of 3 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>/200mL PW, the calcium ion concentration dropped from 11,300 ppm to 4413 ppm. After the addition of 5 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>/200mL PW, the Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration in PW diminished to 1647 ppm, dropping to 84.0 ppm after the addition of 7 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>/200mL PW. Interestingly, magnesium as the second most important earth-alkaline metal found in the studied PW is not as easily crystallized as CaCO<sub>3</sub> so there is some separation of calcium from magnesium possible, although magnesium remains the most dominant contaminant in the precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub> crystals. The solubility products of calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, and strontium carbonate are 4.96 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>9</sup>, 6.82 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup>, and 5.60 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>10</sup>, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-59">
      [59]
     </xref>. Clearly, magnesium carbonate is more soluble in water than calcium carbonate, with the solubility products of the two magnesium carbonate hydrates MgCO<sub>3</sub>∙3H<sub>2</sub>O and MgCO<sub>3</sub>∙5H<sub>2</sub>O tabulated as 2.38 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup> and 3.79 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup>, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-59">
      [59]
     </xref>. Only after most of the calcium content in PW has crystallized as CaCO<sub>3</sub> and added sodium carbonate delivers further carbonate ions does magnesium start crystallizing more abundantly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Schematic presentation of the treatment of PW with Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> to precipitate CaCO<sub>3</sub> and other earth-alkaline carbonates (a) addition of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> to PW; (b) stirring of the resulting solution with precipitation ensuing; (c) filtration of solid earth alkaline carbonates; (d) drying of the solid at 37˚C in a drying cabinet; (e) ICP-analysis.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId30.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 5. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after addition of 3 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (solid) for every 200 g PW.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Earth-alkaline ion</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Abundance</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">4413 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2483 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">285.3 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 6. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after addition of 5 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (solid) for every 200 g PW.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Earth-alkaline ion</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Abundance</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1647 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2273 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">189.2 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 7. Concentration of earth-alkaline ions in PW after addition of 7 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (solid) for every 200 g PW.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Earth-alkaline ion</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Abundance</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">84.0 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1749 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">19.5 ppm</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 9. Calcium concentration in de-oiled PW as a function of added solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId31.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Magnesium concentration in de-oiled PW as a function of added solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId32.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 11. Strontium concentration in de-oiled PW as a function of added solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9404922-rId33.jpeg?20240808013913" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableTables 8-14">
      Tables 8-14
     </xref> show the purity of the crystallized CaCO<sub>3</sub> obtained under different conditions. The purity of the crystallized CaCO<sub>3</sub> is high with the first additions of solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> and then drops: 94.41 w% (upon addition of 3 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, 89.47 w% (upon addition of 7 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>) as also shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
      Table 10
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table12">
      Table 12
     </xref>. The same holds true when adding a concentrated aqueous solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>: 92.26 w% (upon addition of conc. aq. Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> [3 g in 21 mL H<sub>2</sub>O]), 89.76 w% (upon addition of conc aq. Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> [7 g in 35 mL H<sub>2</sub>O]) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
      Table 13
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Apart from magnesium, the calcium carbonate precipitate also showed a significant amount of sodium. As sodium salts are quite soluble in water, CaCO<sub>3</sub> crystallized with 5 g solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>/200mL PW was taken up in water (75 mL) after filtration, and the resulting slurry was stirred at 75˚C for 30 min and subsequently filtered. Interestingly, the CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitate before and after this treatment gave the same CaCO<sub>3</sub> content (92.57 w% vs. 92.58 w%), as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
      Table 10
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table11">
      Table 11
     </xref>. The authors believe that this could be due to encapsulation of sodium salts by the crystallizing CaCO<sub>3</sub>, where the sodium carbonate crystallites serve as seeding points for the crystallization, and where a concentration gradient in carbonate would be expected from the dissolving sodium carbonate crystallite outwards.</p>
    <p>To have a more uniform concentration of carbonate throughout the solution during the crystallization process, a conc. aq. solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> was added dropwise to PW in a separate series of experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
      Table 13
     </xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table14">
      Table 14
     </xref>). However, the purity differences between the CaCO<sub>3</sub> crystallized by addition of solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> and by addition of a concentrated aqueous solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> were not markedly different (92.26 w% vs. 94.41 w%), as seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table11">
      Table 11
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table12">
      Table 12
     </xref>. Washing of the filter cake with minimal amounts of H<sub>2</sub>O in the latter procedure did change the purity of the precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub> (95.48 w% purity vs. 92.58 w% purity), as can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
      Table 13
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table14">
      Table 14
     </xref>. Here, most likely Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> attached to the surface of the CaCO<sub>3</sub> crystals is removed, decreasing the Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> content from 4.65 w% to 1.30 w%.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table8">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
       Table 8
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 8. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with 7 g solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (for 200 mL PW).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">89.47 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.047 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.00 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">3.21 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">5.26 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.013 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table9">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
       Table 9
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 9. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with a conc. aq. solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (7 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> in 35 mL H<sub>2</sub>O for 200 mL PW).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">89.76 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.049 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.83 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">3.09 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">5.22 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.051 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table10">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
       Table 10
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 10. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with 5 g solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (for 200 mL PW).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">92.57 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.043 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.51 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.89 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">3.93 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.057 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table11">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table11">
       Table 11
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 11. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with 5 g solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (for 200 mL PW), then washed with hot water (75 mL, 75˚C).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">92.58 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.032 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.51 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.86 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">3.93 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.088 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table12">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table12">
       Table 12
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 12. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with 3 g solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (for 200 mL PW).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">94.41 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.058 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.27 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.28 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.82 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.162 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table13">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table13">
       Table 13
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 13. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with a conc. aq. solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (3 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> in 21 mL H<sub>2</sub>O for 200 mL PW).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">92.26 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0833 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.13 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">4.65 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.84 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.037 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table14">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table14">
       Table 14
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-"></xref>Table 14. Purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated with a conc. aq. solution of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (3 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> in 21 mL H<sub>2</sub>O for 200 mL PW), precipitate washed with H<sub>2</sub>O (50 mL).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Metal carbonate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">95.48 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.058 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">SrCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.17 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.30 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">MgCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.90 w%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.092 w%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Apart from being used as construction material, calcium carbonate is used in the production of paints, paper and textiles. It is also used as a filling material in plastics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-60">
      [60]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-61">
      [61]
     </xref> and rubber products such as tires, influencing the mechanical properties of the materials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-61">
      [61]
     </xref>. Furthermore, it finds applications in the adhesive industry and the pharmaceutical industry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-62">
      [62]
     </xref>. Also, in the oil and gas industry calcium carbonate is used as a constituent of drilling fluid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134392-63">
      [63]
     </xref>. The purity of calcium carbonate is an important factor in the pricing of the material, with typical prices for bulk CaCO<sub>3</sub> for non-industrial uses in the UAE ranging from US$ 0.4/kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> to US$ 9.6/kg CaCO<sub>3</sub>. The average import price of CaCO<sub>3</sub> into the UAE stood at US$ 0.22/kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> in 2022.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Recommendations and Outlook</title>
   <p>The study showed that PW pe-treated with a three phase separator could be de-oiled effectively by adsorptive filtration over a mixture of activated charcoal and cellulose acetate, where the cellulosic material was obtained from spent coffee grounds, subjected to aq. NaOH extraction and bleaching. The effectiveness of the sorbent material was similar to that derived from non-bleached cellulosic material from SCGs. As the bleaching process only gives a yield of 55.5% and the bleaching itself and subsequent thorough washing of the bleached cellulosic material leads to added liquid waste, the recommendation is to obviate the bleaching process. The authors tried to use leaves of the desert gourd (Citrullus colocynthis) as source of cellulosic material. The leaves were dried, extracted with ethanol, subsequently with aq. NaOH and finally bleached. The acetylation of the material with acetyl chloride in N,N-dimethylacetamide in the presence of pyridine did not lead to fully acetylated cellulose. Therefore, the material was foregone as sorbent for the adsorptive filtration of PW. This, however, does not preclude using other esterified biomass material in the future.</p>
   <p>After the de-oiling process, PW was subjected to the addition of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> with which CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitated from the solution. Here, it was noted that the purity of the precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub> diminished with a continued addition of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. Therefore, it is advisable to carry out the precipitation of CaCO<sub>3</sub> from PW in batches, where a high purity of CaCO<sub>3</sub> is maintained with the addition of up to about 43w% of the amount needed to complete the precipitation of the CaCO<sub>3</sub> present in the PW.</p>
   <p>While the above results are promising, it is important to look at a scale-up of the overall process in the near future.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>PW from an oil and gas operation situated in South Kuwait that was pre-treated with a three-phase separator was de-oiled by adsorptive filtration. Thereafter, the earth-alkaline metal ions were removed from the filtrate by precipitation as carbonates. Calcium carbonate with a purity as high as 95.48 w% could be obtained from the de-oiled PW by precipitation upon addition of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. Together with the industrial salt (NaCl) that can be obtained in a purity of 99.2 w%, as communicated in an earlier publication, the possibility of attaining CaCO<sub>3</sub> in a purity of 95.5 w% during the purification of PW contributes to the potential of making the treatment of PW from oil and gas a financially sustainable operation by generating products of commercial value.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>Part of this research was supported financially by UAEU grant SDG-G0004110. The authors thank CCIC Middle East FZE - Fujairah Branch for the ICP-OES measurements to determine the cation content of the crystallized salt.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Igunnu, E.T. and Chen, G.Z. (2014) Produced Water Treatment Technologies. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 9, 157-177. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/cts049</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kusworo, T.D., Aryanti, N., Qudratun and Utomo, D.P. (2018) Oilfield Produced Water Treatment to Clean Water Using Integrated Activated Carbon-Bentonite Adsorbent and Double Stages Membrane Process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 347, 462-471. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.136</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patni, H. and Ragunathan, B. (2023) Recycling and Re-Usage of Oilfield Produced Water-A Review. Materialstoday: Proceedings, 77, 307-313. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.372</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jiménez, S.B., Micó, M.M., Arnaldos, M., Medina, F. and Contreras, S. (2018) State of the Art of Produced Water Treatment. Chemosphere, 192, 186-208. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salem, F. and Thiemann, T. (2022) Produced Water from Oil and Gas Exploration—Problems, Solutions and Opportunities. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 14, 142-185. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2022.142009</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L.C., Biak, D.R.A., Madaeni, S.S. and Abidin, Z.Z. (2009) Review of Technologies for Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, 530-551. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hedar, Y. and Budiyono. (2018) Pollution Impact and Alternative Treatment for Produced Water. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, Article 03004. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183103004</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Allen, R.M. and Robinson, K. (1993) Environmental Aspects of Produced Water Disposal. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, 3-6 April 1993, 25549. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.2118/25549-MS</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gazali, A.K., Alkali, A.N., Mohammed, Y., Djauro, Y., Dahir, M.D. and Kodomi, M. (2017) Environmental Impact of Produced Water and Drilling Waste Discharges from the Niger Delta Petroleum Industry. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 7, 22-29. 
     <u>&gt;https://www.iosrjen.org/Papers/vol7_issue6/Version-1/D0706012229.pdf</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Neff, J., Lee, K., DeBlois, E.M. (2011) Produced Water: Overview of Composition, Fates, and Effects. In: Lee, K., Neff, J., Eds, Produced Water. Springer. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_1</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pichtel, J. (2016) Oil and Gas Production Wastewater: Soil Contamination and Pollution Prevention. Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, 2016, Article ID: 2707989. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2707989</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salem, F., Poulose, V., Kawamura, K., Nakamura, A., Saibi, H. and Thiemann, T. (2023) Effects of the Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait on the Production Tubing. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 15, 358-375. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2023.157021</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kamshad, T., Al-Ghamdi, A.R., Siritri, R.S. and Kellow, D. (2016) Risk Assessment for Implementation of Chemical Treatment Programs on Production Wells within the Wafra Oilfield Partition Zone (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait). CORROSION 2016, Vancouver, 6-10 March 2016, 7115.
     <u>&gt;https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR16/All-CORR16/NACE-2016-7115/123448</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Al-Hashem, A., Carew, J.A. and Al-Sayegh, A. (2000) The Effects of Water-Cut on the Corrosion Behavior L80 Carbon Steel under Downhole Conditions. CORROSION 2000, Orlando, 10-14 March 2000, 00061. 
     <u>&gt;https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR00/All-CORR00/NACE-00061/111962</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Scott, P.J.B., Al-Hashem, A. and Carew, J.A. (2007) Experiments on MIC of Steel and FRP Downhole Tubulars in West Kuwait Brines. CORROSION 2007, Nashville, 11-15 March 2007, 07113.
     <u>&gt;https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR07/All-CORR07/NACE-07113/126604</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sun, W., Pugh, D.V., Ling, S., Reddy, R.V, Pacheco, J.L., Nisbet, R.S., Nor, N.M., Kersey, M.S. and Morshidi, L. (2011) Understanding and Quantifying Corrosion of L80 Carbon Steel in Sour Environments. CORROSION 2011, Houston, 11-15 March 2011, 11063.
     <u>&gt;https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR11/All-CORR11/NACE-11063/120595</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Smith, S. (2015) Current Understanding of Corrosion Mechanisms Due to H
     <sub>2</sub>S in Oil and Gas Production Environments. CORROSION 2015, Dallas, 15-19 March 2015, 5845.
     <u>&gt;https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR15/All-CORR15/NACE-2015-5485/123229</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, Z.Y., Liao, W., Wu, W., Du, C. and Li, X. (2017) Failure Analysis of Leakage Caused by Perforation in an L415 Steel Gas Pipeline. Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis, 9, 63-70. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2017.07.003</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, X.G., Zhang, D.W., Liu, Z.Y., Du, C. and Dong, C. (2015) Materials Science: Share Corrosion Data. Nature, 527, 441-442. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/527441a</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nath, F., Chowdhury, M.O.S. and Rahman, M.M. (2023) Navigating Produced Water Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Critical Review of Reuse Challenges, Treatment Technologies, and Prospects Ahead. Water, 15, Article 4088. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234088</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Castro, P. and Huber, M.E. (2023) Marine Biology. 12th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Al Salem, F., Al Shamsi, H., Alaryani, M., Khalaf, B., Elsheikh, O., Poulose, V., Al Jasem, Y. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 1. Oil-Water Separation and Industrial Salt Production. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 16, 156-180. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2024.162010</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kristjánsson, I. (1992) Commercial Production of Salt from Geothermal Brine at Reykjanes, Iceland. Geothermics, 21, 765-771. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(92)90029-9</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vieira, M. (1951) Sal comum-a técnica das marinhas, Livraria Sá da Costa.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rodrigues, C.M., Bio, A., Amat, F. and Viera, N. (2011) Artisanal Salt Production in Aveiro/Portugal—An Ecofriendly Process. Saline Systems, 7, Article No. 3. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-7-3</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cipollina, A., Misseri, A., D’Alì Staiti, G., Galia, A., Micale, G. and Scialdone, O. (2012) Integrated Production of Fresh Water, Sea Salt and Magnesium from Sea Water. Desalination and Water Treatment, 49, 390-403. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.699340</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Al Bazedi, G. Ettouney, R.S., Tewfik, S.R., Sorour, M.H. and El-Rifai, M.A. (2014) Salt Recovery from Brine Generated by Large-Scale Seawater Desalination Plants. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 4689-4697. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.810381</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vassallo, F., La Corte, D., Cancilla, N., Tamburini, A., Bevacqua, M., Cipollina, A. and Micale, G. (2021) A Pilot-Plant for the Selective Recovery of Magnesium and Calcium from Waste Brines. Desalination, 517, Article 115231. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115231</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanaka, Y., Ehara, R., Itoi, S. and Goto, T. (2003) Ion-Exchange Membrane Electrodialytic Salt Production Using Brine Discharged from a Reverse Osmosis Seawater Desalination Plant. Journal of Membrane Science, 222, 71-86. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00217-5</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ramasamy, B. (2020) Short Review of Salt Recovery from Reverse Osmosis Rejects, IntechOpen. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88716</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reig, M., Casas, S., Aladjem, C., Valderrama, C., Gibert, O., Valero, F., Centeno, C.M., Larrotcha, E. and Cortina, J.L. (2014) Concentration of NaCl from Seawater Reverse Osmosis Brines for the Chlor-Alkali Industry by Electrodialysis. Desalination, 342, 107-117. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.021</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Stewart, M. (2008) Three-Phase Oil and Water Separators. In: Stewart, M. and Arnold, K., Eds., Gas-liquid and Liquid-Liquid Separators, Gulf Professional Publishing, 131-174.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Han, Y., He, L., Luo, X., Lü, Y., Kaiyue, S., Chen, J. and Huang, X. (2017) A Review of the Recent Advances in Design of Corrugated Plate Packs Applied for Oil-Water Separation. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 53, 37-50. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.04.029</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Young, G.A.B., Wakley, W.D., Taggart, D.L., Andrews, S.L. and Worrell, J.R. (1994) Oil-Water Separation Using Hydrocyclones: An Experimental Search for Optimum Dimensions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 11, 37-50. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(94)90061-2</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bennett, G.F. and Peters, R.W. (1988) The Removal of Oil from Wastewater by Air Flotation: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 18, 189-253. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10643388809388348</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skalak, K.J., Engle, M.A., Rowan, E.L. Jolly, G.D., Conko, K.M., Benthem, A.J. and Kraemer, T.F. (2014) Surface Disposal of Produced Waters in Western and Southwestern Pennsylvania: Potential for Accumulation of Alkali-Earth Elements in Sediments. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126, 162-170. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.12.001</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kothawade, T.R. and Naik, S.J. (2023) Reuse of Produced Water as Injection Water. Materialstoday: Proceedings, 77, 168-175. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.128</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Suhane, S., Dewan, R. and Mohaimin, R. (2022) Potential Use of Treated Produced Water in Irrigation: A Review. In: Siddiqui, N.A., Tauseef, S.M., Abbasi, S.A., Dobhal, R. and Kansal, A., Eds., Advances in Sustainable Development, Springer, 87-100. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4400-9_6</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Echchelh, A., Hess, T. and Sakrabani, R. (2018) Reusing Oil and Gas Produced Water for Irrigation of Food Crops in Drylands. Agricultural Water Management, 206, 124-134. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.006</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Echchelh, A., Hess, T., Sakrabani, R., Prigent, S. and Stefanakis, A.I. (2021) Towards Agro-Environmentally Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Produced Water in Hyper-Arid Environments. Agricultural Water Management, 243, Article 106449. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106449</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mondal, S. and Wickramasinghe, S.R. (2008) Produced Water Treatment by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Journal of Membrane Separation, 322, 162-170. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.039</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zsirai, T., Qiblawey, H., Buzatu, P., Al-Marri, M. and Judd, S.J. (2018) Cleaning of Ceramic Membranes for Produced Water Filtration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 166, 283-289. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.036</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Youssef, R., Qiblawey, H. and El-Naas, M. (2020) Adsorption as a Process for Produced Water Treatment: A Review. Processes, 8, Article 1657. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121657</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Choi, Y., Kim, Y., Woo, Y.C. and Hwang, I. (2023) Water Management and Produced Water Treatment in Oil Sand Plant: A Review. Desalination, 567, Article 116991. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116991</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Miranda, M.A., Ghosh, A., Mahmodi, G., Xie, S., Shaw, M., Kim, S., Krzmarzick, M.J., Lampert, D.J. and Aichele, C.P. (2022) Treatment and Recovery of High-Value Elements from Produced Water. Water, 14, Article 880. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060880</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salem, F. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Variability in Quantity and Salinity of Produced Water from Oil Production in South Kuwait. Engineering, 16, 8-23. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2024.161002</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salem, F., Thiemann, T., Kawamura, K., Nakamura, A., Poulose, V. and Saibi, H. (2024) Purification of Produced Water from Kuwaiti Oil Fields Using Ceramic Membranes. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dhahran, 12 February 2024, 24571. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-24571-MS</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salem, F. (2024) Produced Water Management from Production Sites in the State of Kuwait. Ph.D. Thesis, United Arab Emirates University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shi, C., Chen, Y., Yu, Z., Li, S., Chan, H., Sun, S., Chen, G., He, M. and Tian, J. (2021) Sustainable and Super Hydrophobic Spent Coffee Ground-Derived Holocellulose Nanofibers Foam for Continuous Oil/Water Separation. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 28, e00277. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00277</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, K.-T., Cheng, C.-L., Lee, D.-S., Chen, W.-H., Vo, D.-V.N., Ding, L. and Lam, S.S. (2022) Spent Coffee Grounds Biochar from Torrefaction as a Potential Adsorbents for Spilled Diesel Oil Recovery and as an Alternative Fuel. Energy, 239, Article 122467. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122467</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Koutsoukos, P.G. and Kontoyannis, C.G. (1984) Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate in Aqueous Solutions. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, 80, 1181-1192. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/f19848001181</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Söhnel, O. and Mullin, J.W. (1982) Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate. Journal of Crystal Growth, 60, 239-250. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(82)90095-1</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kitamura, M., Konno, H., Yasui, A. and Masuoka, H. (2002) Controlling Factors and Mechanism of Reactive Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate Polymorphs from Calcium Hydroxide Suspensions. Journal of Crystal Growth, 236, 323-332. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(01)02082-6</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wen, Y., Xiang, L. and Jin, Y. (2003) Synthesis of Plate-Like Calcium Carbonate via Carbonation Route. Materials Letters, 57, 2565-2571. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01312-5</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Grimes, C.J., Hardcastle, T., Manga, M.S., Mahmud, T. and York, D.W. (2020) Calcium Carbonate Particle Formation through Precipitation in a Stagnant Bubble and a Bubble Column Reactor. Crystal Growth&amp;Design, 20, 5572-5582. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00741</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Han, S.-J., Yoo, M., Kim, D.W. and Wee, J.-H. (2011) Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Calcium Hydroxide Aqueous Solution as the Absorbent. Energy Fuels, 25, 3825-3834. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200415p</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hadiko, G., Han, Y.S., Fuji, M. and Takahashi, M. (2005) Synthesis of Hollow Calcium Carbonate Particles by the Bubble Templating Method. Materials Letters, 59, 2519-2522. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.03.036</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El-Sheikh, S., El-Sherbiny, S., Barhoum, A. and Deng, Y. (2013) Effects of Cationic Surfactant during the Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate Nano-Particles on Their Size, Morphology, and Other Characteristics. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 422, 44-49. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.020</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chang, J.C. (1990) Solubility Product Constants. In: Lide, D.R., Ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, 8-39.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lin, Y. and Chan, C.-M. (2012) 3-Calcium Carbonate Nanocomposites. In: Gao, F., Ed., Advances in Polymer Nanocomposites, Woodhead Publishing, 55-90. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096241.1.55</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fang, Q., Song, B., Tee, T.T., Sin, L.-T., Hui, D., and Bee, S.-T. (2014) Investigation of Dynamic Characteristics of Nano-Size Calcium Carbonate Added in Natural Rubber Vulcanizate. Composites Part B: Engineering, 60, 561-567. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.010</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Al Omari, M.M.H., Rashid, I.S., Qinna, N.A., Jaber, A.M. and Badwan, A.A. (2016) In: Brittain, H.G., Ed., Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology, Academic Press, 31-132. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.podrm.2015.11.003</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134392-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Villada, Y., Busatto, C., Casis, N. and Estenoz, D. (2022) Use of Synthetic Calcium Carbonate Particles as an Additive in Water-Based Drilling Fluids. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 652, Article 129801. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129801</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>