Periodic Travelling Waves of a Generalized Curvature Flow Arising from Crystal Growth Models ()
1. Introduction
Based on Herring’s physical formula for anisotropic surface free energy, Taylor, Cahn, and Handwerker [1] reformulated crystal-interface dynamics into a sharp-interface geometric evolution model. They introduced the concept of crystalline curvature
, a generalization of mean curvature adapted to orientation-dependent surface energy
. The interface evolves according to the crystalline curvature flow
, where
denotes the interface normal velocity. In the isotropic limit,
reduced to ordinary mean curvature
. In 2007, Lou [2] investigated the following curvature flow
and showed the existence and uniqueness of the traveling waves. In this paper, we consider a generalized curvature flow
(1)
in heterogeneous media with periodic oblique striations in the
-plane, where
(
) is the inclination angle of the oblique striations, for any time
and any simple plane curve
and for any
,
denotes the curvature of
at
,
denotes the unit normal vector at
and
denotes the velocity along
,
and satisfying
(A)
in
;
is 1-periodic in
;
.
Clearly, the typical example
(2)
satisfies the condition (A) if
and
are continuous, positive and 1-periodic functions in
.
The local-in-time existence and the asymptotic behavior of solutions of (1) have been investigated by many authors(see [3] [4] and references therein). References [5] and [6] studied traveling wave solutions of the special case of (2):
.
In 1993, Altschuler and Wu [7] considered the problem with
and
in (2) and proved that any global solution with some initial data converges to the unique (up to a shift) traveling wave solution. In 2006 and 2013, references [8] and [9] considered the problem (2) with
and
in a band domain with undulating boundaries. They constructed the periodic traveling wave solution and studied its uniqueness and asymptotic stability. Later, Cai and Lou [10] studied the analogue problem with the almost periodic boundaries and obtained the analogue results. In 1994, Altschuler and Wu [11] extended their result in [7] to the case of two dimensions. Recently, the results in [11]-[13] were further improved by Ma, Wang and Wei [14] to
-dimensional space (
).
Since the 1980s, various (mean) curvature flows, including the curvature flow
with
or even
(which corresponds to an expanding flow), have been extensively studied by geometers from a mathematical point of view (see [3] [15]). In 2023, Lou and Yuan [16] studied the generalized mean curvature flow
with
,
and proved the existence, uniqueness, and the asymptotic behavior of radial flows in a cylinder with constant boundary angles.
Our main purpose in this paper is to consider the generalized curvature flow (1) in the case that the curve
is the smooth graph of a function
for each
. To avoid sign confusion, the normal to the curve will always be chosen upward (toward
-direction), and the
and
will be understood in accordance with this choice of the direction of the normal. Consequently,
and (2) is equivalent to
(3)
In the following, a solution
of (3) is called a periodic traveling wave if
(4)
where
is
-periodic in
and
-periodic in
and
,
satisfies
Note that the speed of the wave is time-periodic so that
represents the average speed over one period.
In Section 2, we transform Problems (3) and (4) into the boundary value problem for a first-order ordinary differential equation by means of several changes of variables. In Section 3, we first prove that the boundary value problem for a first-order ordinary differential equation has a unique solution. Then, we verify the existence and uniqueness of periodic traveling waves of (3) and derive the upper and lower bounds for the average speed of the wave.
in (7) is used to give the uniqueness of the periodic traveling waves of (3). Our main result is the following Theorem.
Theorem 1. For any
satisfying
. Equation (3) has a unique periodic traveling wave
,
,
, and
(5)
where the uniqueness holds under our chosen phase normalization condition
in (7).
2. Transformation to a First-Order ODE
For fixed
satisfying
, in order to show the existence and uniqueness of periodic traveling wave solutions of (3) with inclination angle
, the method we adopt is to reduce (3) to a first-order ordinary differential equation.
Let
, then (3) is rewritten as
(6)
Let
,
, then (3) and (4) are rewritten as
(7)
A pair
solving (7) is called a solution of (7). Next, we prove the existence and uniqueness of a solution
of (7); this implies the existence and uniqueness of a periodic traveling wave of (3).
in (7) is used to give the uniqueness of
, without this condition,
is unique up to a translation.
We first prove the following result.
Lemma 1. Let
be a solution of (7); then the following properties hold.
1) The function
is periodic with period
, namely,
(8)
2)
is periodic with period
.
3)
and
,
.
Proof. 1) Since
is 1-periodic in
, the function
satisfies the same differential equation in
as
does. Since
and
, we easily obtain, by the uniqueness of the initial value problem for second-order ODEs, that
. This implies that (8) holds.
2) From (1), we have
. So,
in
.
3) From (2), there exists
such that
. As
, we can get that
by (7).
Now, let
such that
. Then,
so that the differential equation in (7) yield
. Then,
,
.
Lemma 2. Let
,
, then
is a solution of (7) if and only if
be a solution of the following problem
(9)
where the transformation from
to
is given by
,
, and the transformation from
to
is given by
,
.
Proof. This Lemma is easily shown by direct verification and is omitted.
3. Periodic Traveling Wave
For fixed
satisfying
, we prove the existence and uniqueness of periodic traveling wave solutions of (3) with inclination angle
in this section. For this purpose, we first show the following Theorem.
Theorem 2. For any
satisfying
. Problem (9) has a unique solution
, and
(10)
The proof of Theorem 2 easily follows from the following three lemmas.
Lemma 3. For any given
satisfying
and for any given
, the following problem
(11)
has a unique solution
. Moreover
(12)
Proof. We first consider the initial value problem for the following ODE
(13)
Since
, for any given
, by the implicit function theorem, the equation can be rewritten in (13) as
, where
is a
function. Thus (13) is equivalent to
(14)
By the theory of ODEs, (14) has a unique solution
on intervals. Denote by
the maximum existence interval.
1) When
, we consider the existence interval of
. If
, then we have
Since
, we have
, as long as
.
On the other hand, if
, then
implies that
for
.
Therefore,
and
. Especially,
.
2)
is decreasing in c. In fact, using (14),
and
satisfy
So
. By using the variation of constants technique, we have for
,
.
Substituting
into the equation of (13), we have
Differentiating it with respect to c, we get that
.
Hence,
and we have
. This implies that
for
. Therefore,
for any
.
3) Set
. Since for
, we have
so
implies that
. This implies that
. The above (1) means that
and (2) tells us that if
, then
.
4) For any fixed
. On the one hand,
. On the other hand, if
is a value of
at some
, then there exists
such that
and
, so at this point
, we have
i.e.,
. Since
can be chosen arbitrarily, as long as it is a value of
greater than
, we have
when
. Hence,
or
for
.
From (14), there exists
such that, for any
,
satisfies
(15)
5) Denote
, then (15) and (2) deduce that there exists a function
such that
.
Taking the limit
in (14), we have
Therefore,
on
. Clearly,
satisfies (15) and
.
6) Next, we show that
. Otherwise,
for some
. Denote
. Consider (14) with
, where
.
First, we prove that
(16)
In fact, the first inequality is true on
. The second inequality holds on
for some small
. Set
. If
, then (16) is proved. If
, then
. (17)
Set
. Then, on
, there exists
lies between
and
, and
such that
Since
, we have
, in contradiction with (17). Therefore, (16) holds.
Repeating the above discussion on [0, 1], we have
, that is,
. This implies that
, which contradicts the definition of
. Therefore,
, and so the pair
and
is the unique solution of (11).
7) Now, we prove that (12) holds. Since
is 1-periodic, for any
, there exists
such that
,
. Then, at this point
, we have
that is,
. Since
can be chosen arbitrarily, we have
.
Similarly, one can show that
.
Lemma 4. For any given
satisfying
, there exists a unique
such that the corresponding unique solution of (11), that is, the pair
and
(18)
satisfies
for
, and
. Hence,
is the unique solution of (9).
Proof. For any
, recall the solution of (11) is
. Let
, we need to prove that there exists a unique
such that
.
1) By (12), we have
The second inequality is impossible when
. Hence,
and
when
by the first inequality. This means that
as
.
When
, by (12) we know that
.
Since
, it follows that
. Clearly,
, hence
. In fact, if
, then
. So
is the periodic traveling wave of (3), but
does
not satisfy (4).
2) Denote
, then by
, we have
, and so
. Using the notation
in the proof of Lemma 2, we have
The above two assertions imply that there exists a unique
such that
. Thus,
defined by (18) is the unique solution of (9) and
satisfies that
and
for
.
Lemma 5. Let
be the unique solution obtained in Lemma 4, then (10) holds.
Proof.
for
and
imply that
. Hence, (10) follows from (12).
Proof of Theorem 1. From Theorem 2 and Lemma 2, we easily obtain that Problem (9) has a unique solution
, and (10) holds. Let
By using Lemma 1, it is easy to check that
is
-periodic in
and
-periodic in
. From the discussion in Section 2, we follow that Equation (3) has a unique periodic traveling wave
,
,
, and
.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the referees for helpful suggestions.