Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) Gene Mutations in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Clinical Chart Review ()
1. Introduction
Recent medical literature has seen demonstrated a substantially increased interest in genetic testing for predicting various diseases, as well as to evaluate the functionality of various metabolic pathways. For example, one of the most studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme. MTHFR gene variations have been associated with ADHD [1] , autism [2] , cataract [3] , colon cancer [4] , glioma or meningioma [5] , methotrexate toxicity [6] , and migraines [7] .
Idiopathic scoliosis is a curvature of the spine involving a 3-dimensional displacement measuring at least 10 degrees [8] . Evidence [9] suggests that there are multiple potential associations between specific genetic [10] , neurological [11] , and/or endocrine [12] variations that may lead to the cause, or progression of, idiopathic scoliosis. Although reduction in MTHFR activity has been linked to other health conditions, it has not been studied in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Given that methylation is responsible for many enzymatic conversions along several hormone pathways, including the melatonin pathway [13] , it is postulated that alterations of the genes responsible for encoding MTHFR activity may somehow be associated with scoliosis. This is in light of the fact that melatonin deficiency [14] and melatonin signaling abnormalities [15] have been previously implicated in scoliosis etiology.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the 677CT and 1298AC alleles cause a decrease in MTHFR enzyme activity. [16] . A homozygous mutation (677TT) of the 677CT allele has been shown to result in a decrease in MTHFR enzyme activity by 60% [17] , while a heterozygous mutation of both alleles can also cause a 50% - 60% reduction in MTHFR activity. [18] . The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the presence of any MTHFR gene variants in a group of patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients compared to patients who did not have idiopathic scoliosis.
2. Materials and Methods
Patient charts at a private medical clinic were reviewed for those patients who presented with scoliosis. These patients had been given an option to receive genetic testing. Testing was performed via blood, saliva collection or buccal swab, depending upon other concomitant lab work ordered. To minimize specimen collection per patient, the specimen required for other concurrent lab studies was also selected for genetic analysis. Genetic testing was focused on the status of the MTHFR genes, specifically looking at 677CT and 1298AC. For purposes of this study, only the charts of those patients with idiopathic scoliosis were selected. Patients with a history of neuromuscular, syndromic, or congenital scoliosis were excluded. Past treatment history in patients with idiopathic scoliosis was irrelevant and not considered. Based upon these criteria, a total of 44 patient charts were consecutively selected.
Once these patient charts had been identified, an additional set of 44 patient charts was selected. These charts contained information on patients who presented to the same medical clinic, also had genetic testing performed, but did not have any type of scoliosis in their history. This group of charts served as the control group. Once all files were selected, patients whose files were chosen gave their written informed consent to use their non-identifying information. For both groups, the MTHFR gene results were analyzed. Patients would be considered positive for an MTHFR variation if they had one of the following results: 1) a double mutation of either the 677 or 1298 allele (hereafter referred to as homozygous positive), or 2) a single mutation in both alleles (hereafter referred to as heterozygous positive). These results were obtained for all patients in each group, and then compared quantitatively and qualitatively to the other group. Patients in both groups whose charts were selected subsequently provided written permission to use their non-identifying lab results and demographics.
3. Results
When comparing the total sample size of each group to one another, the scoliosis group was positive for an MTHFR mutation in 23 out of 44 cases (52%). The control group was positive in 11 of 44 cases (25%). Figure 1 provides an illustration of this data.
It was also of interest to evaluate the incidence of MTHFR mutations when considering ethnicity. In the scoliosis group, 3 of the 23 positive patients were African-American, 1 was Hispanic, and 1 was Indian. The remaining 18 positive patients were Caucasian. Given a total of 37 total Caucasian scoliosis patients, this makes the incidence of MTHFR defect among this ethnicity to be 49%. In the control group, 8 Caucasians, 2 African-Americans, and 1 Hispanic patient were MTHFR positive, while 2 Indian patients and 1 Hispanic patient were negative. The remaining 38 patients were Caucasian, resulting in an incidence of 21%. Table 1 provides a summary of these results.
With a 99% confidence interval, the data were compared using independent t-tests. These results are shown in Table 2. When examining specific genotypes of each gene, the 677CT/TT genotypes were not statistically different between patient groups. However, the 1298AC/CC genotypes were significantly higher in the scoliosis groups compared to the control group (P < 0.01). The heterozygous
![]()
Figure 1. Frequency of heterozygous and homozygous positive genotypes. Positive genotypes in scoliosis were statistically significant at P < 0.01 (0.002924).
![]()
Table 1. Frequency of 677CT genotypes in IS and control groups.
*P = 0.112335.
![]()
Table 2. Frequency of 1298AC genotypes in IS and control groups.
*Combined occurrence was statistically significant at P < 0.01 (0.007257).
mutation occurred over twice as often, and the homozygous mutations occurred three times more than in the control group.
4. Discussion
The data demonstrate that MTFHR polymorphisms are found significantly more frequently in patients with idiopathic scoliosis when compared with non-scoli- otic patients. It is unlikely, however, that MTHFR variants are causative for scoliosis, given that a notable minority of non-scoliotic patients also carry these polymorphisms. This is the first investigation into the MTHFR genetic variation of the A1298C allele in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Genetic variations of the A1298C allele may reduce tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), which serves as a cofactor for phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) [19] . These enzymes are required to produce serotonin and the catecholamines. Morningstar et al. [20] have previous identified neurotransmitter imbalances in a cohort of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis compared to age-matched controls. Moreover, when these neurotransmitter imbalances were corrected, scoliosis correction was improved compared to scoliotic controls [21] .
It is possible that there could be other genetic variants occurring simultaneously in patients with idiopathic scoliosis, thus increasing the chance of developing the spinal deformity. Alternatively, there may also be environmental factors at play affecting idiopathic scoliosis patients that are not affecting non- scoliotics. The non-scoliotics may also not be exposed to the same environmental factors contributing to the IS onset.
Limitations
This study does not account for the downstream influences of MTHFR variants on neurotransmitter metabolism. For example, methylation is required to convert norepinephrine into epinephrine [22] , and is also important in the negative feedback loop in serotonin metabolism [23] . Morningstar et al have previously described the role of these neurotransmitters in reflexive postural control [24] , which is often altered in the majority of patients with IS [25] . However, it is likely that there are different gradations of downstream activity, possibly dependent upon the patient’s current lifestyle and dietary habits, and local environmental factors. Therefore, investigation into these aspects in this patient population is warranted.
5. Conclusion
When comparing two small clinical samples of patient charts, 52% of patients with a history of idiopathic scoliosis tested positive for an MTHFR genetic variation while only 25% of non-scoliotics tested positive. Given the impact that the methylation cycle has on neurotransmitter metabolism, this study may help to foster further investigation into this impact relative to neuromotor control of postural reflex pathways. It is currently unknown how their interaction may be associated with the development or progression of idiopathic scoliosis.