Shulamith Kreitler, Michal M. Kreitler, Frida Barak
Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University and Psychooncology Research Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Oncology Department, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel.
DOI: 10.4236/jss.2013.16013   PDF    HTML     4,737 Downloads   7,285 Views   Citations

Abstract

The paper presents the psychological correlates of colorectal cancer patients in the framework of the cognitive orientation (CO) theory. According to this cognitive-motivational approach the major factors responsible for disease are a pathogene, background factors and a physiological program implementing the disease processes. Psychological factors form a part of the background factors. They consist of specific cognitive contents forming a motivational disposition, representing four types of beliefs referring to specific contents. The cognitive contents are assessed by a CO questionnaire. Previous studies showed that the CO questionnaire differentiated significantly between colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls in two samples, as well as between both groups and Crohn patients who have potential malignancy. The present study was designed to examine the specificity of the psychological variables characterizing colorectal cancer. The CO questionnaire was administered to male colorectal cancer patients and patients with prostate cancer and male healthy controls, and to female colorectal cancer patients, patients with breast cancer and healthy female controls. In both cases the scores of the CO questionnaire differentiated between the colorectal cancer patients and the two other groups, but there were no differences between the prostate cancer patients or the breast cancer patients and the healthy controls. These findings confirm the hypothesis that the CO variables of colorectal cancer are disease specific and may be considered as psychological risk factors for colorectal cancer.

Keywords

Colorectal Cancer; Personality; Cognitive Orientation; Risk Factors

Share and Cite:

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Amelang, M. (1997). Using personality variables to predict cancer and heart disease. European Journal of Personality, 11, 319-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199712)11:5<319::AID-PER304>3.0.CO;2-D [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[2]	Drechsler, I., Brunner, D., & Kreitler, S. (1987). Cognitive antecedents of coronary heart disease. Social Science and Medicine, 24, 581-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(87)90062-1 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3]	Denollet, J. (1998). Personality and risk of cancer in men with coronary heart disease. Psychological Medicine, 28, 991-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291797006442 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[4]	Figer, A., Kreitler, S., Kreitler, M. M. et al. (2002). Personality dispositions of colon cancer patients. Gastrointestinal Oncology, 4, 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475956021000015095 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[5]	Fox, B. (1998) Psychosocial factors in cancer incidence and prognosis. In J. Holland (Ed.), Psycho-oncology (pp. 110-124). New York: Oxford University Press.
[6]	Gao, R. N., Neutel, C. I., & Wai, E. (2008). Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, hospitalizations and surgical procedures in Canada. Journal of Public Health, 30, 194-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdn019 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7]	Goodkin, K., Antoni, M. H., Sevin, B., et al. (1993). A partially testable predictive model of psychosocial factors in the etiology of cervical cancer. I. Biological, psychological and social aspects. Psychoon-cology, 2, 79-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.2960020203 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[8]	Kotake, K., Honjo, S., Sugihara, K. et al. (2003). Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: An extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 46, S32-S43.
[9]	Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1976). Cognitive orientation and behavior. New York: Springer Publishing.
[10]	Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1982). The theory of cognitive orientation: Widening the scope of behavior prediction. In B. Maher, & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 11, pp. 101-169). New York: Academic Press.
[11]	Kreitler, S. (2003). Psycho-oncology. In L. M. Cohen, D. E. McChar- gue, & F. L. Collins Jr. (Eds.), The health psychology handbook (pp. 325-358). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[12]	Kreitler, S. (2004). The cognitive guidance of behavior. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. A. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The Yin and Yang of scientific progress (pp. 113-126). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
[13]	Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1991a). Cognitive orientation and physical disease or health. European Journal of Personality, 5, 109-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410050205 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[14]	Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1991b). The psychological profile of the health-oriented individual. European Journal of Personality, 5, 35-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410050104 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[15]	Kreitler, S., & Kreitler, H. (1998). Cognitive orientation and disease in cancer patients. Psychooncology, 1, 174.
[16]	Kreitler, S., Kreitler, H., & Chaitchik, S. (1993). Repressiveness: Cause or result of cancer? Psychooncology, 2, 43-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.2960020107 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[17]	Kreitler, S., Levavi, H., & Bornstein, G. (1996). Personality factors and cervical premalignancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 883-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00136-5 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[18]	Kreitler, S., Kreitler, M. M., Len, A., Alkalay, Y., & Barak, F. (2008). Psychological risk factors for colorectal cancer? Psycho-Oncologie, 2, 131-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11839-008-0094-9 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[19]	Lilja, A. O., Smith, G., Malmstroem, P. et al. (1998). Psychological profile related to malignant tumors of different histopathology. Psycho-oncology, 7, 376-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(1998090)7:5<376::AID-PON311>3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[20]	Nurymberg, K., Kreitler, S., & Weissler, K. (1996). The cognitive orientation of compliance in shortand long-term type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 29, 25-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(96)00931-7 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21]	Sanderman, R., & Ranchor, A. V. (1997). The predictor status of personality variables: Etiological significance and their role in the course of disease. European Journal of Personality, 11, 359-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199712)11:5<359::AID-PER307>3.0.CO;2-0 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[22]	Servaes, P., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M, Vreugdenhil, G. et al. (1999). Inhibition of emotional expression in breast cancer patients. Behavioral Medicine, 25, 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08964289909596735 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23]	Temoshok, L., Heller, B. W., Sagebiel, R. W. et al. (1985). The relationship of psychosocial factors to prognostic indicators in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 139- 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(85)90035-2 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]