Beyond Networking: Industrial Clusters as Institutional Orchestrators of CleanTech Innovation Ecosystems

Abstract

Achieving a net-zero economy requires not only technological innovation but also institutional arrangements capable of coordinating collaboration among multiple stakeholders. While the technological dimension of the CleanTech transition has been extensively studied, less attention has been devoted to the governance mechanisms that enable innovation ecosystems to emerge and scale. This paper examines the CECV CleanTech Open Innovation +LATAM-Caribe programme as an exploratory qualitative case study of a cluster-led open innovation ecosystem. Drawing on programme documentation, stakeholder engagement and direct observation, it explores how industrial clusters orchestrate collaboration between large corporations, SMEs, start-ups, research organisations and public institutions. The findings indicate that clusters facilitate knowledge exchange, reduce coordination barriers, mobilise complementary capabilities and align innovation initiatives with the European Net-Zero Industry Act. Beyond networking, clusters emerge as trusted institutional intermediaries that strengthen governance and public-private collaboration. The study proposes a three-layer governance framework for analysing cluster-led collaboration in emerging CleanTech ecosystems. Its transferability and contribution to industrial decarbonisation require further empirical assessment.

Share and Cite:

Bayonne, E. , Molina, B. , Moya, P. and Sáez, A. (2026) Beyond Networking: Industrial Clusters as Institutional Orchestrators of CleanTech Innovation Ecosystems. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 862-881. doi: 10.4236/jss.2026.1410043.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43, 39-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[2] Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[3] Batterink, M. H., Wubben, E. F. M., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. W. F. (2010). Orchestrating Innovation Networks: The Case of Innovation Brokers in the Agri-Food Sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 47-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[4] Bayonne, E., Irún Molina, B., & Moya Arranz, P. (2025). The Role of the Energy Cluster of the Valencian Community as an Orchestrator within an Innovation Ecosystem. In Conference on Human Resource and Enterprise Management.
[5] Bogers, M., Zobel, A., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L. et al. (2017). The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24, 8-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[6] Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[7] Chyi, Y.-L., Lai, Y.-M., & Liu, W.-H. (2012). Knowledge Spillovers and Firm Performance in the High-Technology Industrial Cluster. Research Policy, 41, 556-564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[8] Cluster de Energía de la Comunitat Valenciana CECV (2022). CECV4SUSTAGRIFOOD: Open Innovation Strategies to Promote Collaborative Projects and Environmental Sustainability in the Agrifood Sector (File 2022/34) [Programme Report]. Regional Ministry of Innovation, Industry, Trade and Tourism, Generalitat Valenciana.
[9] Cluster de Energía de la Comunitat Valenciana CECV (2025). CECVImpulsaIA360: Impact of AI on Sustainable and Digital Transformation in Energy-Intensive Sectors (File 2025/26) [Programme Report]. Regional Ministry of Innovation, Industry, Trade and Tourism, Generalitat Valenciana.
[10] Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968-979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[11] Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance. Research Policy, 43, 1785-1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[12] Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31, 659-669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[13] Doblinger, C., Surana, K., & Anadon, L. D. (2019). Governments as Partners: The Role of Alliances in U.S. Cleantech Startup Innovation. Research Policy, 48, 1458-1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[14] Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[15] Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[16] European Cluster Collaboration Platform ECCP (n.d.-a). Cluster Definitions. https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/cluster-definitions
[17] European Cluster Collaboration Platform ECCP (n.d.-b). The Mission of the European Cluster Collaboration Platform. https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/vibrant-platform-service-cluster-organisations
[18] European Commission (2019). The European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640
[19] European Commission (2020). A New Industrial Strategy for Europe (COM(2020) 102 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0102
[20] European Commission (2022). EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles (COM (2022) 141 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0141
[21] European Commission (2025a). A Competitiveness Compass for the EU (COM(2025) 30 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0030
[22] European Commission (2025b). The Clean Industrial Deal: A Joint Roadmap for Competitiveness and Decarbonisation (COM(2025) 85 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0085
[23] European Commission (2025c). The EU Startup and Scaleup Strategy: Choose Europe to Start and Scale (COM(2025) 270 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0270
[24] Gaddy, B. E., Sivaram, V., Jones, T. B., & Wayman, L. (2017). Venture Capital and Clean-tech: The Wrong Model for Energy Innovation. Energy Policy, 102, 385-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[25] Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[26] Giuliani, E. (2007). The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 139-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[27] Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation Ecosystems: A Conceptual Review and a New Definition. Technovation, 90-91, Article ID: 102098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[28] Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[29] Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The Drivers of SME Innovation in the Regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50, Article ID: 104316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[30] Hou, H., & Shi, Y. (2021). Ecosystem-as-Structure and Ecosystem-as-Coevolution: A Constructive Examination. Technovation, 100, Article ID: 102193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[31] Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[32] Huang, P., Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., & Bi, K. (2016). How China Became a Leader in Solar PV: An Innovation System Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 777-789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[33] Irún, B., Monferrer, D., & Moliner, M. á. (2020). Network Market Orientation as a Relational Governance Mechanism to Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of Business Research, 121, 268-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[34] Irún, B., Moya, P., Monferrer, D., Moliner, M. A., & Bayonne, E. (2022a). The Key Role of European Clusters as Innovation Ecosystems, and Their Implication in the Successful International Promotion of the Member Companies in the Strategic Chinese Sectors: Net-Zero and Smart Cities, Smart Ports and Smart Factories. In J. M. Guaita Martínez, & R. Puertas Medina (Eds.), Digitalization in Business: On the Road to a Sustainable World (pp. 95-144). Nova Science Publishers.
[35] Irún, B., Moya, P., Monferrer, D., Moliner, M. A., & Bayonne, E. (2022b). Smart Cities, Smart Factories y Smart Ports en las provincias chinas de Guangdong y Hainan: Oportunidades para las empresas extranjeras. In Impactos de las tecnologías en las ciencias sociales aplicadas 4 (pp. 161-190). Atena Editora. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[36] Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2255-2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[37] Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019a). Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda. Research Policy, 48, 1062-1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[38] Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. (2019b). Passing the Baton: How Intermediaries Advance Sustainability Transitions in Different Phases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 110-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[39] Klerkx, L., & Aarts, N. (2013). The Interaction of Multiple Champions in Orchestrating Innovation Networks: Conflicts and Complementarities. Technovation, 33, 193-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[40] Lee, C.-Y. (2009). Do Firms in Clusters Invest in R&D More Intensively? Theory and Evidence from Multi-Country Data. Research Policy, 38, 1159-1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[41] Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955-967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[42] Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27, 803-815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[43] Monferrer, D., Moliner, M. á., Irún, B., & Estrada, M. (2021). Network Market and Entrepreneurial Orientations as Facilitators of International Performance in Born Globals. The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 137, 430-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[44] OECD (2007). Competitive Regional Clusters: National Policy Approaches. OECD Publishing.
[45] OECD (2009). Clusters, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing.
[46] Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-90.
[47] Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Establishing a Framework of Measures for Strengthening Europe’s Net-Zero Technology Manufacturing Ecosystem (Net-Zero Industry Act). Official Journal of the European Union, 50, 1735. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj
[48] Reypens, C., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2021). Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-Stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of Mobilizing Multiple, Diverse Stakeholders across Organizational Boundaries. Organization Studies, 42, 61-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[49] Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change. Research Policy, 47, 1554-1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[50] Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change: Combining Insights from Innovation Systems and Multi-Level Perspective in a Comprehensive “Failures” Framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037-1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[51] West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 814-831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[52] Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2020). How Can Open Innovation Ecosystem Modes Push Product Innovation Forward? An fsQCA Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 108, 29-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[53] Xu, G., Wu, Y., Minshall, T., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Exploring Innovation Ecosystems across Science, Technology, and Business: A Case of 3D Printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 208-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[54] Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between Cooperation Networks and Innovation Performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30, 181-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[55] Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43, 39-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[56] Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[57] Batterink, M. H., Wubben, E. F. M., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. W. F. (2010). Orchestrating Innovation Networks: The Case of Innovation Brokers in the Agri-Food Sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 47-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[58] Bayonne, E., Irún Molina, B., & Moya Arranz, P. (2025). The Role of the Energy Cluster of the Valencian Community as an Orchestrator within an Innovation Ecosystem. In Conference on Human Resource and Enterprise Management.
[59] Bogers, M., Zobel, A., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L. et al. (2017). The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes across Different Levels of Analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24, 8-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[60] Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[61] Chyi, Y.-L., Lai, Y.-M., & Liu, W.-H. (2012). Knowledge Spillovers and Firm Performance in the High-Technology Industrial Cluster. Research Policy, 41, 556-564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[62] Cluster de Energía de la Comunitat Valenciana CECV (2022). CECV4SUSTAGRIFOOD: Open Innovation Strategies to Promote Collaborative Projects and Environmental Sustainability in the Agrifood Sector (File 2022/34) [Programme Report]. Regional Ministry of Innovation, Industry, Trade and Tourism, Generalitat Valenciana.
[63] Cluster de Energía de la Comunitat Valenciana CECV (2025). CECVImpulsaIA360: Impact of AI on Sustainable and Digital Transformation in Energy-Intensive Sectors (File 2025/26) [Programme Report]. Regional Ministry of Innovation, Industry, Trade and Tourism, Generalitat Valenciana.
[64] Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy, 41, 968-979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[65] Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance. Research Policy, 43, 1785-1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[66] Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31, 659-669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[67] Doblinger, C., Surana, K., & Anadon, L. D. (2019). Governments as Partners: The Role of Alliances in U.S. Cleantech Startup Innovation. Research Policy, 48, 1458-1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[68] Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[69] Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[70] European Cluster Collaboration Platform ECCP (n.d.-a). Cluster Definitions. https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/cluster-definitions
[71] European Cluster Collaboration Platform ECCP (n.d.-b). The Mission of the European Cluster Collaboration Platform. https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/vibrant-platform-service-cluster-organisations
[72] European Commission (2019). The European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640
[73] European Commission (2020). A New Industrial Strategy for Europe (COM(2020) 102 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0102
[74] European Commission (2022). EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles (COM (2022) 141 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0141
[75] European Commission (2025a). A Competitiveness Compass for the EU (COM(2025) 30 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0030
[76] European Commission (2025b). The Clean Industrial Deal: A Joint Roadmap for Competitiveness and Decarbonisation (COM(2025) 85 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0085
[77] European Commission (2025c). The EU Startup and Scaleup Strategy: Choose Europe to Start and Scale (COM(2025) 270 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0270
[78] Gaddy, B. E., Sivaram, V., Jones, T. B., & Wayman, L. (2017). Venture Capital and Clean-tech: The Wrong Model for Energy Innovation. Energy Policy, 102, 385-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[79] Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[80] Giuliani, E. (2007). The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 139-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[81] Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation Ecosystems: A Conceptual Review and a New Definition. Technovation, 90-91, Article ID: 102098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[82] Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of Innovation Systems: A New Approach for Analysing Technological Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[83] Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The Drivers of SME Innovation in the Regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50, Article ID: 104316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[84] Hou, H., & Shi, Y. (2021). Ecosystem-as-Structure and Ecosystem-as-Coevolution: A Constructive Examination. Technovation, 100, Article ID: 102193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[85] Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[86] Huang, P., Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., & Bi, K. (2016). How China Became a Leader in Solar PV: An Innovation System Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 777-789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[87] Irún, B., Monferrer, D., & Moliner, M. á. (2020). Network Market Orientation as a Relational Governance Mechanism to Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of Business Research, 121, 268-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[88] Irún, B., Moya, P., Monferrer, D., Moliner, M. A., & Bayonne, E. (2022a). The Key Role of European Clusters as Innovation Ecosystems, and Their Implication in the Successful International Promotion of the Member Companies in the Strategic Chinese Sectors: Net-Zero and Smart Cities, Smart Ports and Smart Factories. In J. M. Guaita Martínez, & R. Puertas Medina (Eds.), Digitalization in Business: On the Road to a Sustainable World (pp. 95-144). Nova Science Publishers.
[89] Irún, B., Moya, P., Monferrer, D., Moliner, M. A., & Bayonne, E. (2022b). Smart Cities, Smart Factories y Smart Ports en las provincias chinas de Guangdong y Hainan: Oportunidades para las empresas extranjeras. In Impactos de las tecnologías en las ciencias sociales aplicadas 4 (pp. 161-190). Atena Editora. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[90] Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2255-2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[91] Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019a). Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda. Research Policy, 48, 1062-1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[92] Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. (2019b). Passing the Baton: How Intermediaries Advance Sustainability Transitions in Different Phases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 110-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[93] Klerkx, L., & Aarts, N. (2013). The Interaction of Multiple Champions in Orchestrating Innovation Networks: Conflicts and Complementarities. Technovation, 33, 193-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[94] Lee, C.-Y. (2009). Do Firms in Clusters Invest in R&D More Intensively? Theory and Evidence from Multi-Country Data. Research Policy, 38, 1159-1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[95] Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955-967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[96] Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27, 803-815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[97] Monferrer, D., Moliner, M. á., Irún, B., & Estrada, M. (2021). Network Market and Entrepreneurial Orientations as Facilitators of International Performance in Born Globals. The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 137, 430-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[98] OECD (2007). Competitive Regional Clusters: National Policy Approaches. OECD Publishing.
[99] OECD (2009). Clusters, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing.
[100] Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-90.
[101] Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Establishing a Framework of Measures for Strengthening Europe’s Net-Zero Technology Manufacturing Ecosystem (Net-Zero Industry Act). Official Journal of the European Union, 50, 1735. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj
[102] Reypens, C., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2021). Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-Stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of Mobilizing Multiple, Diverse Stakeholders across Organizational Boundaries. Organization Studies, 42, 61-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[103] Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change. Research Policy, 47, 1554-1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[104] Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change: Combining Insights from Innovation Systems and Multi-Level Perspective in a Comprehensive “Failures” Framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037-1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[105] West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 814-831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[106] Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2020). How Can Open Innovation Ecosystem Modes Push Product Innovation Forward? An fsQCA Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 108, 29-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[107] Xu, G., Wu, Y., Minshall, T., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Exploring Innovation Ecosystems across Science, Technology, and Business: A Case of 3D Printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 208-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[108] Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between Cooperation Networks and Innovation Performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30, 181-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.