Occurrence and Virulence Gene Profiles of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157:H7 Isolated from Cattle at Abattoirs in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria

Abstract

Enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) Escherichia coli O157:H7 is an important foodborne zoonotic pathogen carried asymptomatically by cattle and capable of causing severe disease in humans. This study investigated the occurrence and virulence gene profiles of (EHEC) E. coli O157:H7 isolated from cattle at selected abattoirs in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria. A total of 450 rectal swab samples were collected from cattle slaughtered at five major abattoirs (Dei-Dei, Gwagwalada, Kubwa, Karu, and Guzape). Isolation was carried out using standard bacteriological techniques, followed by biochemical confirmation and serological identification using O157 latex agglutination and H7 flagellar antigen tests. Genomic DNA was extracted from confirmed isolates using the QIAGEN DNA extraction kit, and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect the eaeA, hlyA, rfbE, and fliCH7 virulence genes. Overall, E. coli was isolated from 175 (38.9%) samples. Of the 28 presumptive isolates selected for confirmation, 18 (64.3%) were biochemically confirmed as E. coli, while 8 (44.4%) possessed the O157 antigen. From the total E. coli, 18 (4%) were suspected O157 colonies on Sorbitol MacConkey Agar. Following O157 latex agglutination, 8 (1.78%) were positive, H7 flagellar agglutination shows 5 (1.11%) and EHEC result shows 2 (0.44%). Molecular characterization demonstrated the presence of the targeted virulence genes among the confirmed E. coli O157 isolates, confirming their pathogenic potential. The occurrence of EHEC E. coli O157:H7 did not differ significantly among the sampled abattoirs (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, p > 0.05). The findings demonstrate that cattle slaughtered in FCT abattoirs constitute a reservoir of pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 and underscore the need for strengthened abattoir hygiene, routine microbiological surveillance, and integrated One Health interventions to reduce contamination of beef and the risk of zoonotic transmission.

Share and Cite:

Madugu, S.A., Ameh, J.A., Mailafia, S., Olabode, H.O.K., Egwu, G.O. and Shammah, V.B. (2026) Occurrence and Virulence Gene Profiles of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O157:H7 Isolated from Cattle at Abattoirs in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. Advances in Microbiology, 16, 371-389. doi: 10.4236/aim.2026.169021.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a facultatively anaerobic, Gram-negative bacterium that colonizes the intestine of humans and warm-blooded animals as part of their normal gut flora. Although many strains are harmless commensals of the gut microbiome, several E. coli pathotypes have acquired virulence factors that enable them to cause intestinal and extra-intestinal infections [1] [2]. Based on pathogenic mechanisms, clinical presentations, and their genotypic traits, diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) are classified into six major pathotypes: enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) [3] [4]. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli is considered one of the deadliest E. coli pathotypes due to its capacity to cause serious systemic sequelae [5].

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli O157: H7 is a Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) serotype that represents a global food safety challenge. Pathogens of this group are characteristically Shiga toxin-producing (stx1 and/or stx2), harbingers of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), and able to mediate intimate attachment to intestinal epithelial cells [6]-[8]. EHEC O157: H7 infections are foodborne and can occur after the ingestion of as few as bacteria. Domestic animals, particularly cattle, are widely known to be asymptomatically infected with EHEC O157: H7, contributing to their persistence as foodborne pathogens of public health concern [9].

Studies have shown cattle are the predominant reservoir host of EHEC O157:H7. In cattle, colonization of EHEC O157:H7 is prevalent at the terminal recto-anal junction (R-AnJ) and is shed intermittently in faeces as the bacteria colonize the large intestine [10]-[13]. Experimental studies have established that cattle can be easily colonized and persistently infected with EHEC O157:H7, thus serving as the primary source of contamination of the environment and the food chain. Several research works carried out locally and in different parts of the world have isolated EHEC O157:H7 from cattle faeces, hides, and carcasses [12].

E. coli O157 is a major foodborne pathogen that causes illnesses ranging from mild diarrhea to hemorrhagic colitis and severe complications such as hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a leading cause of acute kidney failure in children [14]. Globally, outbreaks have been linked to contaminated beef, unpasteurized milk, vegetables, and water, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic losses due to reduced consumer confidence in beef products [15]. Because antibiotic treatment may increase toxin release, managing EHEC O157 infections is challenging. Cattle serve as an important reservoir, and transmission to humans commonly occurs during slaughter through carcass contamination caused by poor hygiene, contaminated equipment, and improper handling practices [16]. These risks are further exacerbated in many low- and middle-income countries by inadequate slaughterhouse infrastructure, poor sanitation, insufficient training of meat handlers, and weak enforcement of food safety regulations, increasing the likelihood of contaminated meat reaching consumers [14].

Routine surveillance and monitoring for the presence of foodborne pathogens in abattoirs are not regularly conducted in Nigeria. Although several abattoir-based studies have been conducted within the country, sampling was restricted to specific geopolitical zones. These include South-Western Nigeria [17], South-Western Nigeria [18], South-Eastern Nigeria [19], and North-Central Nigeria [20] [21]. Importantly, these works focused only on the prevalence of bacteria, with limited molecular data on EHEC O157:H7 occurrence and virulence gene profiles available for Nigeria, especially in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja. With this limited information, risk assessment and preparedness for outbreaks would be difficult. There is increasing demand for animal protein as Nigeria’s population continues to grow. Abuja, being the seat of the government, welcomes more livestock traders from within and outside the country in search of markets. Therefore, there is a need for updated and locality-specific data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was conducted in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria, which is located in the North-Central geopolitical zone of the country between latitudes 8˚25' and 9˚20'N and longitudes 6˚45' and 7˚39'E. The FCT covers an area of approximately 7315 km2 and comprises six Area Councils: Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC), Gwagwalada, Kuje, Bwari, Abaji, and Kwali. The territory has a tropical savannah climate characterized by distinct wet and dry seasons, with average annual temperatures ranging from 25˚C to 30˚C. Livestock farming and cattle trading are important economic activities in the FCT, and several major abattoirs operate within the territory, supplying beef to residents and neighboring states. The high volume of cattle slaughtered and the extensive meat distribution network make the FCT an appropriate setting for investigating the occurrence and virulence gene profiles of E. coli O157 in slaughtered cattle, as well as assessing the potential public health risks associated with beef production and consumption (see Figure 1) [22].

2.2. Study Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the occurrence and virulence gene profiles of E. coli O157:H7 isolated from cattle at selected abattoirs in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria. The specific aims were to isolate and identify E. coli and EHEC O157:H7 from cattle rectal swabs collected at abattoirs sampled, confirm the isolates using standard biochemical tests for E. coli and slide agglutination test for EHEC O157:H7, and determine the virulence genes associated with isolates using multiplex PCR.

Figure 1. Map of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria, showing the study area and the six Area Councils. Adapted from Federal Capital Territory Administration (n.d.) [22].

2.3. Sample Size Determination

The minimum sample size for this study was determined using the formula for estimating a single population proportion, as described by Thrusfield [23]:

N = Z2pq/d2

where:

N = Sample size;

Z = Standard normal deviation for a 95% confidence interval (1.96);

P = Prevalence 32.8% [24];

D = desired precision (0.05);

q = 1 − p.

N= ( 1.96 ) 2 ×0.328×( 10.328 ) ( 0.05 ) 2 =339 .

The calculated minimum sample size was 339. However, to improve the precision and reliability of the study and to ensure adequate representation of cattle slaughtered across the selected abattoirs, the sample size was increased to 450 fresh cattle faecal samples. A total of 90 samples were collected from each of the five selected abattoirs during the study period. Samples were collected irrespective of the age, sex, or health status of the animals presented for slaughter.

2.4. Sample Collection

Approximately 5 - 10 g of fresh cattle rectal swabs were collected aseptically using sterile disposable gloves from the rectum of slaughtered cows into sterile, labeled universal sample containers. Samples were labeled with appropriate codes to indicate the location (abattoir) of origin and date of sampling. All samples were transported in ice boxes maintained at 4˚C to the laboratory. They were further processed immediately or stored temporarily at 4˚C for no more than 24 h prior to analysis.

2.5. Isolation of E. coli O157

Isolation of E. coli O157 was carried out using standard bacteriological procedures. Rectal swab samples collected from slaughtered cattle were aseptically inoculated into sterile, labelled sample bottles containing 8 - 9 mL of MacConkey broth (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours for pre-enrichment. Following incubation, a loopful of each enriched culture was streaked onto Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 37˚C for 24 - 48 hours. Colonies exhibiting a characteristic greenish metallic sheen on EMB agar were regarded as presumptive E. coli [25].

Representative colonies with a metallic sheen were aseptically picked using a sterile inoculating loop and subcultured onto Sorbitol MacConkey Agar (SMAC; Oxoid, UK), followed by incubation at 37˚C for 24 hours. Colourless (non-sorbitol fermenting) colonies on SMAC were considered presumptive E. coli O157, since most E. coli O157 strains are unable to ferment sorbitol. These presumptive isolates were subsequently subcultured onto nutrient agar slants, incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours, and stored at 4˚C until further characterization [24].

2.6. Biochemical Characterization of E. coli O157 Isolates

Presumptive E. coli O157 isolates were further confirmed by conventional biochemical tests as described by Mailafia et al. [24]. The isolates were tested for indole production and motility using Sulphide-Indole-Motility (SIM) medium (Merck, Germany), citrate utilization using Simmons citrate agar (Merck, Germany), methyl red and Voges-Proskauer (MR-VP) reactions using MR-VP medium (Merck, Germany), and urease production using urea agar (Oxoid, UK). Isolates exhibiting the characteristic biochemical profile of E. coli—motile, indole positive, methyl red positive, Voges-Proskauer negative, citrate negative, and urease negative—were considered confirmed E. coli isolates and were preserved for subsequent molecular characterization of E. coli O157 virulence genes.

2.7. Serological Identification of E. coli O157

Biochemically confirmed E. coli isolates were serologically identified using a slide latex agglutination test for the detection of O157 and H7 antigens. Briefly, a pure colony from each confirmed isolate was emulsified separately with O157 and H7 latex antisera on a clean glass slide according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction mixture was gently rocked for approximately 1 minute and examined for visible agglutination. Isolates that produced visible agglutination with both O157 and H7 antisera were regarded as E. coli O157, while those showing no agglutination or reacting with only one antiserum were considered negative for E. coli O157 [26] [27].

2.8. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from confirmed E. coli O157 isolates using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a pure overnight bacterial culture was harvested and suspended in the appropriate lysis buffer containing Proteinase K to facilitate cell lysis. Following incubation, ethanol was added to the lysate, and the mixture was transferred onto a DNeasy spin column, where genomic DNA selectively bound to the silica membrane. The column was washed sequentially with the recommended wash buffers to remove proteins and other contaminants. Finally, purified genomic DNA was eluted with the elution buffer supplied in the kit and stored at −20˚C until used as the template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the virulence genes [28] [29].

2.9. Molecular Detection of Virulence Genes by Multiplex PCR

Multiplex PCR was used to detect virulence genes associated with enterohaemorrhagic E coli O157:H7. Primers targeting eaeA (intimin), fliC (H7 flagellin), rfbE (O157 somatic antigen), hlyA (HlyA) (enterohaemolysin), and stx1 (Shiga toxin 1) genes were used for detection. Genomic DNA extracted from confirmed E. coli isolates served as template for the PCR assay. Primers used for detection of each gene and the expected amplicon sizes are described below (Table 1).

Table 1. Primers used for molecular detection of E. coli O157:H7 virulence and serotype-specific genes.

Target gene

Primer

Primer sequence (5'-3')

Amplicon size (bp)

Target function

Reference

eaeA

Forward

Reverse

GCAAATTTAGGTGCGGGTCAGCGTT

GGCTCAATTTGCTGAGACCACGGTT

494

Encodes intimin (an adherence protein)

Wang et al. [30]

rfbE

Forward

Reverse

CTACAGGTGAAGGTGGAATGG

ATTCCTCTCTTTCCTCTGCGG

327

Encodes the O157 somatic antigen

Wang et al. [30]

fliCH7

Forward

Reverse

TACCATCGCAAAAGCAACTCC

GTCGGCAACGTTAGTGATACC

247

Encodes the H7 flagellar antigen

Wang et al. [30]

hlyA

Forward

Reverse

AGCTGCAAGTGCGGGTCTG

TACGGGTTATGCCTGCAAGTTCAC

569

Encodes enterohemolysin (EHEC-hlyA)

Wang et al. [30]

Each PCR reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 µL consisting of 12.5 µL of 2× PCR master mix (which contains Taq DNA polymerase enzyme, deoxynucleotide triphosphates [dNTPs], MgCl2, and buffer), 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers, 5 µL of DNA template, and made up to volume with nuclease-free water. PCR was performed in a thermocycler under the following optimized conditions: initial denaturation at 94˚C for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94˚C for 30 seconds, annealing at 58˚C - 60˚C for 30 seconds, extension at 72˚C for 60 seconds, and a final extension at 72˚C for 7 minutes.

The PCR products were resolved on a 1.5% agarose gel prepared in 1× TBE buffer. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using a gel documentation system under UV transillumination. Band sizes of the amplified fragments were determined by comparison with a 100 bp DNA molecular weight marker. Standard EHEC O157:H7 strains were used as positive controls while nuclease-free water was used as the negative control for each PCR run.

2.10. Data Collection and Analysis

Data were collected from laboratory investigations, including bacteriological isolation, biochemical identification, serological confirmation, and molecular detection of virulence genes in E. coli O157 isolates recovered from cattle rectal swab samples. Laboratory findings were entered into Microsoft Excel 2019 and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the occurrence of E. coli and E. coli O157 as frequencies and percentages. Differences in the occurrence of E. coli among abattoirs were assessed using Pearson’s Chi-square test, while the distribution of E. coli O157 across sampling locations was evaluated using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test because of the small number of positive isolates. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7

A total of 450 cattle faecal samples were collected from five abattoirs in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria, and examined for the presence of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7. Of the 450 samples analyzed, 175 (38.9%) yielded E. coli isolates, while 8 (1.8%) were confirmed as E. coli O157:H7, representing 4.6% (8/175) of the confirmed E. coli isolates (Table 2).

The distribution of E. coli isolates varied slightly among the five abattoirs (Table 3). Dei-Dei recorded the highest prevalence of E. coli with 41 (45.6%) positive samples, followed by Karu with 37 (41.1%), Gwagwalada with 35 (38.9%), Kubwa with 32 (35.6%), and Guzape with 30 (33.3%). The prevalence of E. coli O157 was low across all sampling locations, with two isolates (2.2%) recovered from each of the Dei-Dei, Gwagwalada, Karu, and Guzape abattoirs, whereas no E. coli O157 isolate was detected in samples collected from the Kubwa abattoir.

Pearson’s Chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of E. coli among the five abattoirs (χ2 = 2.11, p = 0.71). Because the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7 was low and several expected cell frequencies were less than five, the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test was used to compare the distribution of O157:H7 isolates across the abattoirs. The exact test showed no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7 among the five sampling locations (p = 0.69).

Table 4 presents the sequential screening and confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 and EHEC among the 450 cattle faecal samples examined from abattoirs within the Federal Capital Territory. Of the 450 samples examined, 18 (4.00%) produced suspected O157 colonies on sorbitol MacConkey agar (SMAC) and were therefore subjected to further confirmation. Following latex agglutination testing, 8 (1.78%) samples were positive for the O157 antigen, indicating the presence of E. coli isolates with the O157 serogroup characteristic. Further serological testing for the H7 flagellar antigen identified 5 (1.11%) H7-positive isolates among the samples examined. Thus, the combined O157 and H7 findings indicate the presence of isolates with O157:H7-associated characteristics in the cattle population sampled. The result also shows 2 (0.44%) isolates as EHEC-positive. This represents the proportion of the 450 cattle faecal samples classified as EHEC in the study.

The phenotypic and biochemical characteristics of the confirmed E. coli O157:H7 isolates are summarized in Table 5. All isolates produced characteristic greenish metallic sheen colonies on Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar and were oxidase negative. The isolates were uniformly motile and produced acid and gas during glucose fermentation on Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) agar. In addition, all isolates were methyl red positive, Voges-Proskauer negative, indole positive, and urease negative. These biochemical characteristics were consistent among all isolates examined and supported their identification as E. coli O157:H7.

The molecular characterization revealed considerable variation in the distribution of virulence-associated genes among the eight E. coli O157:H7-associated isolates (as shown in Table 6). The hlyA gene, with an expected amplicon size of 596 bp, was detected in G228 and G263, while G288 showed a faint band interpreted as a possible hlyA detection. The eaeA gene (494 bp) was detected in D18 and K138, whereas the rfbE gene (327 bp) was detected only in D18. The fliC gene (247 bp) was detected in G201, D18, K121 and K138.

Among the isolates, D18 demonstrated the most extensive virulence-associated profile, with simultaneous detection of eaeA, rfbE, and fliC. This profile indicates the presence of markers associated with intimin, the O157 antigen, and H7 flagellar characteristics, respectively. K138 also carried eaeA and fliC, giving it an eaeA/fliC-associated profile. G201 and K121 each showed detection of the fliC marker alone among the four virulence-associated genes examined.

Table 2. Prevalence of E. coli isolates from cattle in FCT abattoir.

To Sample examined

Number of Positive E. coli

Number of Positive E. coli O157:H7

E. coli isolate

E. coli O157:H7 strains

Number of positives (%)

Number of positives (%)

N = 450

175 (38.88)

8 (1.77)

Table 3. Prevalence of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 in different abattoirs within the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria.

Location of abattoir

No. of samples examined

E. coli No. positive (%)

E. coli O157:H7 No. positive (%)

Dei-Dei

90

41 (45.56)

2 (2.22)

Gwagwalada

90

35 (38.89)

2 (2.22)

Kubwa

90

32 (35.56)

0 (0.00)

Karu

90

37 (41.11)

2 (2.22)

Guzape

90

30 (33.33)

2 (2.22)

Total

450

175 (38.89)

8 (1.78)

Statistical test

Pearson’s χ2 = 2.11, p = 0.71

Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, p = 0.69

Table 4. Screening and confirmation of E. coli O157:H7 and EHEC among cattle faecal samples.

Detection/confirmation stage

Number positive (n)

Prevalence (%)

Cattle faecal samples examined

450

100.00

Suspected O157 colonies on SMAC

18

4.00

O157 positive by latex agglutination

8

1.78

H7 positive by flagellar agglutination

5

1.11

EHEC positive

2

0.44

Table 5. Phenotypic and biochemical reactions of suspected isolates of E. coli O157:H7.

Isolate

EMB

GS

O

M

TSI

VP

MR

CI

I

U

G201

GMS

−Ve

−Ve

+ve

A/A+ gas

−Ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−Ve

G228

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

G263

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

G288

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

D18

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

D55

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

K121

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

K138

GMS

−ve

−ve

+ve

++

−ve

+ve

Green

+ve

−ve

Key: EMB = Eosine Methylene Blue, GMS = Greenish Metallic Shine, O = Oxidase, M = Motility, TSI = Triple Sugar Iron, VP = Voges Proskauer, MR = Methyl Red, CI = Citrate, I = Indole, U = Urease, −ve = Negative, +ve = Positive

Table 6. Canonical molecular characteristics of E. coli O157:H7-associated isolates from FCT abattoirs.

Isolate ID

hlyA (596 bp)

eaeA (494 bp)

rfbE (327 bp)

fliC (247 bp)

Molecular interpretation

G201

+

H7-associated marker detected

G228

+

hlyA detected

G263

+

hlyA detected; resistance genes detected

G288

+*

Possible hlyA detection; band is faint

D18

+

+

+

eaeA/rfbE/fliC-associated profile

D55

No clearly resolved target band in this gel

K121

+

H7-associated marker detected

K138

+

+

eaeA/fliC-associated profile

Key: + = gene detected/present; − = gene not detected/absent; * = faint band requiring confirmation; hlyA = enterohaemolysin-associated gene; eaeA = intimin gene; rfbE = O157-associated marker; fliC = H7 flagellin-associated marker; blaTEM = β-lactam resistance gene; tetA = tetracycline resistance gene.

3.2. Serological Confirmation of E. coli O157:H7

Serological identification using slide agglutination tests confirmed the presence of O157 and H7 antigens among selected E. coli isolates. A proportion of the isolates reacted positively with O157 antisera, while subsequent testing confirmed O157:H7 serotypes, thereby validating the presence of EHEC O157:H7 strains in cattle rectal swab samples from FCT abattoirs Figure 2 and Figure 3.

Figure 2. Circle 1 and 4 show positive results to the latex agglutination test to E. coli O157.

Figure 3. The Second two circles (2 and 5) show positive results to flagella test to confirm E. coli O157:H7.

3.3. Molecular Identification of E. coli O157 Virulence Genes

The multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay successfully amplified the target virulence genes in the confirmed E. coli O157 isolates (as shown in Figure 4). The DNA molecular weight marker (100 bp ladder) was used to estimate the sizes of the amplified products. Specific amplification products corresponding to the hlyA (596 bp), eaeA (494 bp), rfbE (327 bp), and fliC H7 (247 bp) genes were detected in the isolates.

The electrophoretic profiles revealed variations in the distribution of virulence genes among the isolates. While some isolates harboured all four virulence genes, others lacked one or more target genes, resulting in different banding patterns across the lanes. Amplification of the rfbE gene confirmed the presence of the O157 serogroup, whereas amplification of the fliC H7 gene confirmed the H7 flagellar antigen. Similarly, the detection of the eaeA and hlyA genes demonstrated the presence of important virulence determinants associated with the pathogenicity of E. coli O157.

The positive control produced the expected amplification bands for the target genes, confirming the validity of the PCR assay, whereas no amplification was observed in the negative control, indicating the absence of contamination. The multiplex PCR assay confirmed the molecular identity of the isolates and demonstrated variability in their virulence gene profiles.

Figure 4. Multiplex PCR Gel Electrophoresis for E. coli O157:H7 Isolates.

This gel electrophoresis image displays the results of Multiplex PCR for the detection of specific E. coli virulence genes (Figure 4). The Molecular Ladder (ML) on the left serves as a reference, with marked bands at 596 bp (Hyla), 494 bp (Eae), 327 bp (RfbE), and 247 bp (Flic). Lanes 1-8 represent different E. coli isolates, each showing distinct bands corresponding to these target genes. The +VE (Positive Control) exhibits multiple expected bands, confirming successful amplification, while the −VE (Negative Control) shows no visible bands, ensuring no contamination. The presence of multiple bands in different sample lanes indicates the detection of various virulence genes in the E. coli isolates.

Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of E. coli O157:H7 virulence genes.

The phylogenetic analysis of the sequences of 4 E. coli virulence genes (fliC, HlyA, rfbE and eae) generated in this study (Figure 5) showed that, each of the 4 virulence genes sequences obtained in this study cluster with the ones obtained from the genbank with bootstrap values of 46% - 100%. Sequences generated in this study had 98% similarity with those in the genbank. The sequences produced in this study are the red-colored taxa. While the blue-colored taxon is the sequence of Campylobacter jejuni stain MTG14 from the Genbank, which was used as an outgroup, the black-colored taxa display the sequences obtained from the genbank.

4. Discussion

The overall E. coli prevalence of 38.88% is comparable with reports from other African countries indicating cattle as reservoirs of potentially pathogenic E. coli strains [31]-[33]. Detection of EHEC O157: H7 from cattle rectal swabs analyzed in this study (0.44%) is consistent with previous reports from Nigeria that cattle are reservoirs of this emerging foodborne pathogen of public health concern [24]. Isolation of EHEC O157: H7 from apparently healthy cattle used for meat production corroborates previous evidence that cattle asymptomatically shed this pathogen into the environment and contaminate meat and water products [34] [35].

The prevalence of EHEC O157:H7 isolates observed in this study is similar to other abattoir-based prevalence surveys conducted across Nigeria which report low but epidemiologically relevant detection rates [24] [36]. Similar prevalence rates of EHEC O157:H7 have been documented among cattle sampled from abattoirs in northern Nigeria [37] and south-south Nigeria [38]. Prevalence rates ranging from 1% to 8% have been attributed to differences in sampling design, sample sizes, and methods of detection. Similar observations have been reported in abattoir-based studies in Ethiopia [39]. These observations suggest that the prevalence of EHEC O157:H7 may be relatively low among cattle populations in Nigeria but is consistent across regions.

Molecular characterization of the isolates demonstrated the presence of important virulence genes, including eaeA, fliC H7, rfbE, and hlyA, confirming the pathogenic potential of the recovered E. coli O157 strains. The eaeA gene encodes intimin, an outer membrane adhesin that mediates intimate bacterial attachment to intestinal epithelial cells and promotes the formation of attaching-and-effacing lesions, which are characteristic of enterohaemorrhagic E. coli infections [40]-[42]. Similarly, the hlyA gene encodes enterohaemolysin, a pore-forming cytotoxin that contributes to host cell damage and enhances bacterial virulence [42] [43]. The rfbE and fliC H7 genes serve as highly specific molecular markers for the O157 somatic antigen and H7 flagellar antigen, respectively, and are widely employed for the molecular identification of E. coli O157 [30]. The detection of these virulence determinants confirms that the isolates recovered in this study possess genetic characteristics commonly associated with enterohaemorrhagic E. coli strains capable of causing severe human disease [42]-[44]. Further confirmation of the O157: H7 serotype was provided by the detection of rfbE and fliC genes, which are biomarkers for lipopolysaccharide (O antigen) and flagellin (F antigen) adhesins, respectively. Expression of hlyA mediates enterohemolysin production, which contributes to cytotoxicity in infected individuals. Concomitant detection of multiple virulence genes among single isolates recovered in this study has been observed in surveillance studies conducted globally [36] [45].

Abattoirs play a critical role in the transmission and environmental dissemination of enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157, particularly when hygienic slaughtering and carcass handling practices are inadequate. Cattle transported from different parts of Nigeria to slaughterhouses in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) may introduce the pathogen into the abattoir environment, resulting in contamination of carcasses, equipment, wastewater, and surrounding areas. These findings underscore the importance of improving sanitation, waste management, routine microbiological surveillance, and hygienic meat processing practices to reduce the risk of contamination and subsequent foodborne transmission [45] [46].

The phylogenetic analysis of the four Escherichia coli O157:H7-associated genes (fliC, hlyA, rfbE, and eae) provided evidence of close genetic relationships between the sequences obtained from cattle isolates in Abuja, Nigeria, and corresponding sequences deposited in GenBank. The sequences generated in this study clustered with reference E. coli sequences and showed approximately 98% sequence similarity, indicating that the detected gene sequences were closely related to previously reported E. coli O157:H7-associated sequences. The clustering observed for rfbE and fliC is particularly relevant because these genes are associated with the O157 somatic and H7 flagellar characteristics, respectively, and have been used as molecular markers for identification of the O157:H7 serotype [30]. Similarly, eae and hlyA are important virulence-associated genes; eae encodes intimin, which contributes to intimate attachment of the organism to intestinal epithelial cells, whereas hlyA is associated with enterohaemolysin production [30] [43]. The bootstrap values observed in the tree (46% - 100%) indicate varying levels of support for individual branches, with branches receiving higher bootstrap values providing stronger evidence for the observed clustering. Thus, the phylogenetic relationships support the genetic similarity of the Abuja sequences to previously characterized E. coli O157:H7-associated genes circulating in other geographical regions.

In the phylogenetic tree, the sequences generated in the present study are indicated in red and are positioned within clusters containing homologous E. coli sequences retrieved from GenBank, whereas the black taxa represent reference sequences used for comparison. The inclusion of Campylobacter jejuni strain MTG14 as an anoutgroup provides an evolutionary reference for rooting the tree and separates the Campylobacter sequence from the E. coli sequences. The observed clustering of the Abuja isolates with geographically diverse GenBank sequences suggests that the virulence-associated genes examined in this study share substantial sequence conservation with homologous genes reported elsewhere. Similarity at individual virulence loci is expected because genes such as rfbE and fliC are used as serotype-associated markers, while eae and hlyA contribute to important pathogenic characteristics of enterohaemorrhagic E. coli [30] [43]. However, because the phylogenetic analysis was based on individual gene sequences rather than whole-genome data, the observed clustering should be interpreted as evidence of relatedness at the respective gene loci rather than definitive evidence of clonal or epidemiological relationships among the isolates. Whole-genome sequencing would provide stronger resolution for determining the evolutionary relationships and possible transmission links among the Abuja isolates and strains from other geographical locations.

The recovery of virulent E. coli O157 isolates carrying important virulence genes highlights the potential public health risk associated with contaminated meat and water. Because this pathogen has a low infectious dose and can cause severe illnesses such as haemorrhagic colitis and haemolytic uraemic syndrome, particularly among children and immunocompromised individuals, strengthened meat inspection, proper meat handling, thorough cooking of beef, and public health education are essential. Furthermore, the findings support the adoption of an integrated One Health approach involving the animal, human, and environmental health sectors to strengthen surveillance, improve disease prevention, and facilitate coordinated control of EHEC O157 in Nigeria [47].

5. Conclusion

This study demonstrated that cattle slaughtered in abattoirs within the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria, serve as reservoirs of potentially pathogenic EHEC E. coli O157:H7 carrying important virulence genes, underscoring the need for improved abattoir hygiene, routine molecular surveillance, and a coordinated One Health approach to reduce the risk of foodborne transmission and to protect public health.

Author Contributions

Shuaibu Aliyu Madugu: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, and writing original draft preparation.

James Agbo Ameh: Supervision, methodology, project administration, and writing review and editing.

Samuel Mailafia: Supervision, methodology, project administration, and writing review and editing.

Hamza Olatunde K. Olabode: Supervision, methodology, project administration, and writing review and editing.

Godwin Onyemaechi Egwu: Supervision, resources, validation, and writing review and editing.

Victor Bitrus Shammah: Data analysis, visualization, interpretation of results, writing original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing.

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Hassan, A.O., Ojo, B.O. and Abdulrahman, A.O. (2021) Escherichia coli as a Global Pathogen. Achievers Journal of Scientific Research, 3, 239-260.
[2] Basavaraju, M. and Gunashree, B.S. (2023) Escherichia coli: An Overview of Main Characteristics. In: Escherichia coliOld and New Insights, IntechOpen, 1-21.[CrossRef]
[3] Makarova, M.A. (2023) A Modern View of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli—A Causative Agent of Acute Intestinal Infections. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology, 100, 333-344.[CrossRef]
[4] Kamal Raj, D., Saravanan, S.K., Viswanathan, A., Elavarasu, S.M., Nanda Kumar, S.K., Sridharan, K.S., et al. (2026) Pathotype-Specific Antimicrobial Resistance in Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli: Gene Variants, Resistance Mechanisms, and Evolution of Treatment Strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology, 17, Article ID: 1770628.[CrossRef]
[5] Mohammed, L.R., Luo, Z. and Hama Soor, T.A. (2024) Epidemiology of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli: A Mini Review. Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research, 8, 71-81.[CrossRef]
[6] Yun, Y.S., Park, D.Y., Oh, I.H., Shin, W.R., Ahn, G., Ahn, J.Y. and Kim, Y.H. (2025) Pathogenic Factors and Recent Study on the Rapid Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Molecular Biotechnology, 67, 16-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Juarez, A.E., Krüger, A. and Lucchesi, P.M.A. (2025) Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli, Food Contamination, and Bacteriophages as a Control Strategy. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 89, e00244-25.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Nemati, A., Dadvar, A., Eppinger, M., Karimpour, Z., Saberi Kakhki, S., Sabeti Moghaddam Sabzevar, A., et al. (2025) Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in Developing Countries: A 10-Year Review with Global Perspective. Microorganisms, 13, Article No. 1529.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] World Health Organization (2015) WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Food-borne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007-2015. World Health Organization.
[10] Larzábal, M., Da Silva, W.M., Multani, A., Vagnoni, L.E., Moore, D.P., Marin, M.S., et al. (2020) Early Immune Innate Hallmarks and Microbiome Changes across the Gut during Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infection in Cattle. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 21535.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Lange, M.E., Uwiera, R.R.E. and Inglis, G.D. (2022) Enteric Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Cattle, and the Use of Mice as a Model to Elucidate Key Aspects of the Host-Pathogen-Microbiota Interaction: A Review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, Article ID: 937866.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Bibbal, D., Ruiz, P., Sapountzis, P., Mazuy-Cruchaudet, C., Loukiadis, E., Auvray, F., et al. (2022) Persistent Circulation of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 in Cattle Farms: Characterization of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 Strains and Fecal Microbial Communities of Bovine Shedders and Non-shedders. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, Article ID: 852475.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Padola, N.L., Castro, V., Etcheverría, A., Figueiredo, E., Guillén, R. and Umpiérrez, A. (2023) Bovine Reservoir of STEC and EPEC: Advances and New Contributions. In: Torres, A.G., Ed., Trending Topics in Escherichia coli Research: The Latin American Perspective, Springer International Publishing, 107-127.[CrossRef]
[14] Malabadi, R.B., Sadiya, M.R., Kolkar, K.P. and Chalannavar, R.K. (2024) Pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) Food Borne Outbreak: Detection Methods and Controlling Measures. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10, 52-85.[CrossRef]
[15] Majowicz, S.E., Scallan, E., Jones-Bitton, A., Sargeant, J.M., Stapleton, J., Angulo, F.J., et al. (2014) Global Incidence of Human Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infections and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Knowledge Synthesis. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 11, 447-455.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Singha, S., Thomas, R., Viswakarma, J.N. and Gupta, V.K. (2022) Foodborne Illnesses of Escherichia coli O157 Origin and Its Control Measures. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 60, 1274-1283.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Yakubu, R.O., Lawan, M.K., Kwaga, J.K.P. and Kabir, J. (2020) Isolation, Molecular Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Household-Reared Small Ruminants in Zaria Metropolis, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Sahel Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 17, 16-23.[CrossRef]
[18] Deji-Agboola, A.M., Bamigbola, F.A. and Osinupebi, O.A. (2020) Prevalence of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7, Shiga Toxin Genes and Antibiotic Resistance in Children Aged 0-5 Years with Diarrhoea in Ibadan, Oyo State. African Journal of Science and Nature, 10, 171-178.[CrossRef]
[19] Nwankwo, I., Nwanta, J. and Onunkwo, J. (2023) Abattoirs as Meat Safety and Disease Surveillance Points in Nigeria: The Case of Ikpa Slaughterhouse, Nsukka, Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 21, 47-50.[CrossRef]
[20] Okoli, C.E., Njoga, E.O., Oguttu, J.W. and Chah, K.F. (2026) Molecular Detection and Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Escherichia coli and Closely Related Enterobacteriaceae from Cattle Carcasses and Meat Contact Surfaces at Slaughterhouses in Abuja, Nigeria. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, Article ID: 1782324.[CrossRef]
[21] Anueyiagu, K.N., Ayuba, J.M., Dalhatu, H.A., Otetah, F.C., Vwot, E.Y., Michael, S.L., Lugard, D.D. and Pam, M.Z. (2026) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles and Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella Isolated from Apparently Healthy Slaughter Cattle in Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 18, 39-47.[CrossRef]
[22] Federal Capital Territory Administration (n.d.) Abuja Geographic Information Systems (AGIS).
https://agis.fcta.gov.ng/
[23] Thrusfield, M. (1997) Veterinary Epidemiology. 2nd Edition, Blackwell Science Ltd.
[24] Mailafia, S., Madubuike, S.A., Raji, M.A., Suleiman, M.M., Olabode, H.O.K., Echioda-Egbole, M. and Okoh, G.P.R. (2017) Phenotypic Identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates from Cattle at Suleja Abattoir, Nigeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 11, 845-850.
[25] Cheesbrough, M. (2005). District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[26] Mainil, J.G. and Daube, G. (2005) Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli from Animals, Humans and Foods: Who’s Who? Journal of Applied Microbiology, 98, 1332-1344.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Smith, S.I., Bello, O.S., Goodluck, H.A., Omonigbehin, E.A., Agbogu, V.N. and Odeigah, P. (2009) Prevalence of EHEC O157:H7 from Human and Environmental Samples from Lagos and Zaria. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 25, 398-403.
[28] Bai, X., Wang, H., Xin, Y., Wei, R., Tang, X., Zhao, A., et al. (2015) Prevalence and Characteristics of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Retail Raw Meats in China. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 200, 31-38.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Karama, M., Mainga, A.O., Cenci-Goga, B.T., Malahlela, M., El-Ashram, S. and Kalake, A. (2019) Molecular Profiling and Antimicrobial Resistance of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O26, O45, O103, O121, O145 and O157 Isolates from Cattle on Cow-Calf Operations in South Africa. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 11930.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Wang, G., Clark, C.G. and Rodgers, F.G. (2002) Detection in Escherichia coli of the Genes Encoding the Major Virulence Factors, the Genes Defining the O157:H7 Serotype, and Components of the Type 2 Shiga Toxin Family by Multiplex PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40, 3613-3619.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Abdalhamed, A.M., Ghazy, A.A., Ibrahim, E.S., Arafa, A.A. and Zeedan, G.S.G. (2021) Therapeutic Effect of Biosynthetic Gold Nanoparticles on Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella Species Isolated from Ruminants. Veterinary World, 14, 3200-3210.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Yeda, R.A. (2025) Genetic Phylogeny of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Pathotypes and Their Antibiotic Resistance Patterns among Children below Five Years Living in Close Contact with Food Animals, Kisumu County Hospital, Kenya. Doctoral Dissertation, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology.
[33] Genet, C., Enbiale, W., Rommerskirchen, A., Abubeker, R., Weldemariam, A.G., Tasew, G., et al. (2026) Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase and Carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia coli from Patients, Cattle, and Environmental Sources in Northwest Amhara, Ethiopia: A One Health Approach. BMC Microbiology, 26, Article No. 586.[CrossRef]
[34] Loubamba, L., Diallo, A.A., Musabyemariya, B., Moyen, R., Sylla, K.S.B. and Alambédji, R.B. (2023) Virulence Genes (stx1/stx2/eae) and O Serogroups of Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from the Slaughtered Cattle and Ground Meat Sold in Retail Markets in Dakar, Senegal. The Microbe, 1, Article ID: 100024.[CrossRef]
[35] Martin, M.M., Martin, H.D. and Lyimo, B.M. (2026) Prevalence, Virulence Profiles and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Shiga Toxin Producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 among Children 6-59 Months in Longido, Arusha-Tanzania. PLOS ONE, 21, e0353396.[CrossRef]
[36] Ajuwon, B.I., Babatunde, S.K., Kolawole, O.M., Ajiboye, A.E. and Lawal, A.H. (2021) Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Beef at a Commercial Slaughterhouse in Moro, Kwara State, Nigeria. Access Microbiology, 3, Article ID: 000289.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Aliyu, R.M., Abubakar, M.B., Yakubu, Y. and Shuaibu, A.B. (2021) Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Some Animal Products Sold within Sokoto Metropolis, Nigeria. African Journal of Bacteriology Research, 13, 1-6.
[38] Elemuwa, C.O., Isibor, J.O., Inyang, N.J., Elemuwa, U.G., Omoregie, R. and Ayanlere, M. (2023) Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection and Its Effects on Haematological Parameters among Patients in Central Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. New Zealand Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, 77, 109-112.
[39] Abunna, F., Asrat, D., Bekele, A., Regassa, A., Megersa, B. and Amenu, K. (2016) Isolation and Characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Cattle and Beef in Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology, 7, 1-7.
[40] Somda, N.S., Adesoji, T.O., Tetteh-Quarcoo, P.B. and Donkor, E.S. (2025) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Presence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Africa from a One Health Perspective. Microorganisms, 13, Article No. 902.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Jerse, A.E., Yu, J., Tall, B.D. and Kaper, J.B. (1990) A Genetic Locus of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Necessary for the Production of Attaching and Effacing Lesions on Tissue Culture Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 7839-7843.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Kaper, J.B., Nataro, J.P. and Mobley, H.L.T. (2004) Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2, 123-140.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Croxen, M.A., Law, R.J., Scholz, R., Keeney, K.M., Wlodarska, M. and Finlay, B.B. (2013) Recent Advances in Understanding Enteric Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26, 822-880.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Schmidt, H., Beutin, L. and Karch, H. (1995) Molecular Analysis of the Plasmid-Encoded Hemolysin of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Strain EDL 933. Infection and Immunity, 63, 1055-1061.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Hossain, M.A.S., Ibrahim, N. and Barnett, K.N. (2025) Hygiene Practices in Slaughterhouses and Public Health Risk: A Scoping Review. PLOS ONE, 20, e0334225.[CrossRef]
[46] Ovuru, K.F., Izah, S.C., Ogidi, O.I., Imarhiagbe, O. and Ogwu, M.C. (2023) Slaughterhouse Facilities in Developing Nations: Sanitation and Hygiene Practices, Microbial Contaminants and Sustainable Management System. Food Science and Biotechnology, 33, 519-537.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Bolton, D.J. (2011) Verocytotoxigenic (Shiga Toxin-Producing) Escherichia coli: Virulence Factors and Pathogenicity in the Farm to Fork Paradigm. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 8, 357-365.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.