Characterization of Bentic Microfauna of the Maastrichtian Deposits of EB-1 Well, Ivory Coast Onshore Basin

Abstract

This study focuses on the characterization of the benthic microfauna from 19 drill cuttings samples from the EB-1 oil well, located in the onshore part of the Ivory Coast basin. The main objective is to reconstruct the depositional environment and establish the lithostratigraphy of the Maastrichtian sediments. The studied lithological profile (between 201 m and 120.5 m in the direction of sedimentation) is divided into three main units: Unit A (Base) is essentially composed of fossiliferous limestone. Unit B (Middle) is an alternation of clays and fine to coarse sands, and finally, Unit C (Top) is an alternation of sand and kaolinite. Biostratigraphic and microfaunal analysis revealed a rich (3241 individuals) but not very diverse microfauna, dominated at 84.49% by benthic foraminifera. The genera Praebulimina, Orthokarstenia, and Afrobolivina predominate. However, there is a low presence of planktonic foraminifera (Planoheterohelix, Rugoglobigerina). The combined analysis of lithological data and the pelagism index allows for the reconstruction of the depositional environment. This is a medium-depth, internal platform environment (estimated depth between 10 and 100 meters) which suggests ecological conditions characterized by a high proliferation of Bolivinidae and Buliminidae, associated with low species diversity, indicating anoxic conditions (oxygen-poor environment) and an abundance of organic matter. This work confirms the Maastrichtian age of the EB-1 well deposits and highlights a shallow marine environment, marked by sea-level fluctuations and episodes of oxygen deficiency.

Share and Cite:

Koffi Epse Coulibaly, L. C., Djeya, L. K., Konan, V. A., Bamba, K., & Monde, S. (2026) Characterization of Bentic Microfauna of the Maastrichtian Deposits of EB-1 Well, Ivory Coast Onshore Basin. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 14, 136-146. doi: 10.4236/gep.2026.147008.

1. Introduction

Following the discovery of bitumen at Eboinda in Ivory Coast in 1896, exploration and exploitation permits were granted to oil companies in order to increase discoveries and increase hydrocarbon production.

It is in this context that PETROCI conducted studies to determine the overall structure of the Ivorian basin as well as the main biostratigraphic features (microfauna), both offshore and onshore. Indeed, the environment of the Ivorian basin was highlighted by the existence of fossiliferous species living over a geological time interval (from the Cretaceous to the current one). These research studies on the basin conducted by geologist researchers Zahoui (2003), Ouffoue (2005), Djeya et al. (2010), Bamba et al. (2011), Kouassi et al. (2013), Koffi (2017), Ahoure (2021) and many others have provided details on microfauna (foraminifera, ostracods) and the microflora of the Cretaceous in offshore, from biostratigraphic data that led to the identification of various species, in different stages. However, there is a scarcity of information on the lithology, biostratigraphy and deposition environment of the Cretaceous (onshore) as well as its valorization. This work is part of this framework and aims to provide clarification on the species of the Maastricht Chtian. This study is based on the spoil of deposits traversed by the EB-1 drill located on the onshore part (Figure 1). Its coordinates are 5˚18'42.35''N and 3˚58'15.64''W.

Figure 1. The sedimentary basin of Côte d’Ivoire and location of the EB-1 well.

2. Material and Methods

Nineteen samples of spoil from the interval 120.5 m to 201 m of the EB-1 oil drilling were used as support for this study. Each sample, processed using a conventional method starting from about 20 grams, was the subject of lithological and micropaleontological analyses. The analytical protocol includes a washing with soapy water, followed by a wet sieving using a decreasing mesh sieve column (250 μm, 100 μm, 63 μm). The residues are then dried at 90˚C in the oven, then sorted under a binocular lens. The taxonomic identification of extracted microfaunas is based on specialized literature and internal technical reports from PETROCI. The interpretation of deposition environments is based on the model of Elf-Aquitaine Boussens Pau (1977), based on the pelagic index, defined by the ratio between the number of planktonic foraminifera and the total planctonic and benthic foraminifera.

3. Results

3.1. Lithostratigraphy

Figure 2 presents the lithostratigraphic synthesis of the studied interval, detecting three main units arranged from base to top. This organization reflects a vertical evolution of facies, reflecting variations in deposition conditions over time:

Unit A: is essentially composed of limestone. This unit is fossiliferous between 201 m and 194.5 m.

Unit B: consists of clays and sands in alternation, between 195.5 m and 155.5 m.

Unit C: Consists essentially of an alternation of sand and kaolinite. This unit is between 132 m and 120.5 m.

Figure 2. Lithological synthesis of the studied interval in the EB-1 well.

The lithological synthesis of the interval studied in the EB-1 well revealed that this well is essentially composed of limestone, alternating clay and fine coarse sand and alternating sand and kaolinite.

3.2. Biostratigraphic

Quantitative Analysis of Microfauna (Figure 3)

The sorting work carried out on all the residues of the 19 samples showed a rich microfauna composed mainly of foraminifera (3241 individuals recorded) associated with ostracods, shell debris (gastropods and bivalves), fish teeth. Figure 3 shows an abundance of microfauna in benthic forms, i.e. a rate of 84.49% of the total population divided into 12 genera and 14 species, and a rarity of planktonic forms, i.e. 15.51% of the total population divided into 3 genera and 5 species. 19 shells of gastropods and 16 bivalves; and 23 teeth of fish also make the percentage of these.

Figure 3. Sectoral distribution of foraminifer populations in the range 120.5 m - 201 m from well EB-1 (FOBCA: Limestone benthic foraminifers; FOPL: Planktonic foraminifers.).

3.3. Biostratigraphic Synthesis of the Study Interval

By the analytical method, the study carried out on this interval allowed to confirm the Maastricht stage with the presence of species at different sides that are dominated by planktonic forms throughout the interval: planoheterohelix and rugoglobigerina. These planktonic forms are associated with the endofaunal limestone benthic forms characteristic of the Maastrichtian. These are: Praebulimina; Orthokarstenia; Afrobolivina (Figure 4).

3.3.1. Systematics of Microfauna

1) Systematic (Plate 1)

The planktonic and benthic foraminiferal species mentioned in this thesis have been described in the micropaleontological literature. Microfauna analysis is based on the number of lodges, the test and certain morphological traits. Observation with a Nikon smz 1500 stereoscopic microscope with magnification (100 μm).

Plate 1. 1: Afrobolivina afra (Reyment, 1959); 2: Praebulimina accumifera (Hofker, 1953); 3: Laevidentalina sp (Loeblich & Tappan, 1986); 4: Gavelinella nacatochensis (Brotzen, 1942); a: Ombilical face; b: Spiral face; c: View face; 5: Vaginulina sp (d’Orbigny, 1826); 6: Orthokarstenia idkyensis (Dietrich, 1935).

Figure 4. Frequency histogram of foraminifera from Maastrichtian.

Suborder: Rotaliina (Delage & Hérouard, 1896)

Family: Bolivinidae (Glaessner, 1937)

Gender: Afrobolivina afra (Reyment, 1959)

Description: Large test, elongated, biserial throughout, with angular lodges. Adorned with ribs and a terminal opening.

Family: Siphogenernoididae (Saïdova, 1981)

Genus: Orthokarstenia idkyensis (Dietrich, 1935)

Description: Elongated test, gradually widening from the rounded base, spherical, of a biserial stage not well visible, slightly swollen in the uniseriate, characteristic sutures, depressed; calcareous walls, striated and discontinuous surface; terminal opening.

Family: Heterolepidae (González-Donoso, 1969)

Genus: Praebulimina accumifera (Hofker, 1953).

Description: Test ovoid, swollen, triserial shape, depressed; limestone wall, finely perforated, appearing thick and opaque, smooth or spiny surface; opens a loop at the base of the final loge.

Suborder: Lagenina (Delage & Hérouard, 1896)

Family: Nodosariidae (Ehrenberg, 1838)

Genus: Vaginulina sp (d’Orbigny, 1826)

Description: Arched, compressed limestone test with a small number of ribs, composed of compartments separated by depressed inclined sutures.

Genus: Laevidentalina sp (Loeblich & Tappan, 1986)

Description: Limestone test, elongated and uniseriate. The sutures are depressed and a tooth opening and the number of lodges is 2.

Family: Gavelinellidae (Hofker, 1956)

Genus: Gavelinella nacatochensis (Brotzen, 1942)

Description: Test trochospiral, biconvex, rounded periphery; limestone wall, perforated; extraumbilical opening, bordered above by a narrow lip, the opening continue under the flaps to connect with those of the anterior chambers, depressed sutures.

3.3.2. Paleoenvironment

The study of this microfauna coupled with that of lithology, has made it possible to highlight associations that reflect different types of deposition environments.

1) Hierarchical tree of microfauna

The hierarchical ascending classification carried out here has made it possible to obtain a similarity of the abundant species in the studied stage that goes from the most abundant to the least abundant. This method made it possible to identify 5 distinct classes similar among each other.

The classes are as follows (Figure 5):

  • Class 1: consists of Preabulimina fang, Gavelinella nacatochensis, Afrobolivina afra, Orthokarstenia idkyensis, Gavelinella lorneiana.

  • Class 2: consists of Planoheterohelix globulosa, Rugoglobigerina rugosa, Rugoglobigerina macrocephala, Gabonita sp.

  • Class 3: also consists of Orthokarstenia clavata, Vagininula, Preabulimina accuminifera.

  • Class 4: was divided into 2 groups consisting of Preabulimina bantu, Eponides and Planoheterohelix sp, Anomalinoides.

  • Class 5: consists of Laevidentalina sp.

Figure 5. Hierarchical tree.

2) Pelagic index

  • Between 120.5 m and 132 m, we notice the presence of water with a pelagic index ranging from 2% to 0% (Figure 6).

  • Between 132 m and 140 m, we notice a slight increase in the sea level.

  • Between 140 m and 145.5 m, we notice a sudden drop of up to 5% which would indicate a decrease in the sea level.

  • Between 145.5 m and 158.5 m, the pelagic index from 5% to 20%; this indicates an increase in the water slice.

  • Between 158.5 m and 165 m the pelagism evolves in the range of 40% and 60% with significant fluctuations.

  • Between 165 m and 184 m, we notice a drop in the sea level.

  • The pelagism index obtained at the level of 184 m to 186 m and from 194.5 to 200.5 m shows an increase in the sea level.

At the sedimentological level, lithology consists of sandy black argillites, then compact argillites (kaolinite), followed by limestone of which some gastropods are observed. According to Djrouko et al. (2021), the presence of these species in the basin reflects a shallow marine deposition environment.

This interval is distinguished by a rich but little diversified benthic microfauna, dominated by the families of Bolivinidae and Buliminidae. This proliferation, associated with a low specific diversity, suggests anoxic conditions, these taxa being adapted to oxygen-deficient environments. Moreover, the occasional rarity of planktonic forms and globular tests indicates an environment from internal to medium platform (10 - 100 m).

The presence of the genus Gabonita confirms a shallow deposition medium, eutrophic and marked by severe dysoxia, linked to a high concentration of organic matter. Overall, the assemblage of benthic foraminifers (although quite monotonous) combines Nodosariidae (such as Laevidentalina and Vaginulina), characteristics of coastal areas, and deeper facies forms like Eponides. This set is typical of medium platform circalitoral environments (Brun, 1978).

Figure 6. EB-1 pelagic well index.

4. Discussion

The different microfaunas that allowed the biostratigraphy of the studied interval to be established are known in most West African coastal basins. In our study interval the association of limestone benthic genera such as Afrobolivina (Reyment, 1959), Eponides (Montfort, 1808-1810), Anomalinoides (Brotzen, 1942), Praebulimina (Hofker, 1953), Orthokarstenia (Dietrich, 1935), Laevidentalina (Loeblich & Tappan, 1986), Vaginulina (d’Orbigny, 1826), Gabonita (Dieni, 1974), Gavelinella (Brotzen, 1942) and rare planktonic forms, notably Planoheterohelix (Georgescu & Huber, 2009), Rugoglobigerina (Brönnimann, 1952) have made it possible to affirm the Maastrichtchtian. The work of Koutsoukos & Hart (1990) indicates that this association of bolivinidae and buliminidae is typical of the Maastrichtian in the Sergipe basin (Brazil), (M’Bani, 2008) in the Congo Basin. As noted, the microfauna in our sediments is dominated by the Buliminidae (Praebulimina fang, Parabolizing acuminifera) and the Bolivinidae (Afrobolivina afra, Anomalinoides, Orthokarstenia…) and the observations obtained on the hierarchical tree confirm the abundance of these species in the treated samples. These results corroborate those of Goua (1997) which stipulate that these endofaunas (Buliminidae et Bolivinidae) large sizes abound in hostile habitats related to facies deposited under a layer of water with minimum oxygen, where they proliferate without any competition and also as an example in Congo (Massala, 1993) and in Senegal (Ly & Kuhnt, 1994). Moreover, this association above is also encountered in the surveys of Fresco, Yao (2012) and even mentioned in Congo by M’Bani (2008), according to the work of (Goua, 1997) indicates a slice of oxygenated water and the indices of pelagics ranging from 20% to 60% indicate the presence of water and reoxygenation of the environment which corresponds to the average platform Vail et al. (1987). One can deduce that these associations suggest a medium platform deposition environment. The lithological data (kaolinite, sandy clay and limestone) mentioned in the work of Douzo et al. (2019) and Yao (2012) and stratigraphy were highlighted at the Maastricht-Chtian and allowed the determination of the environment of deposits starting from the internal to medium platform.

5. Conclusion

The characterization of the microfauna of the Maastricht-aged deposits of the EB-1 shaft in the onshore part of the basin allowed for an inventory of microfaunas (foraminifera, ostracods and other mollusc debris). It resulted in the establishment of lithology as well as its fossiliferous content and subsequently deduced its depositional environment.

From a lithological point of view, the analyzed drill cuttings deposits consist of 3 units dominated by the alternation of clay and fine to coarse sand between 195.5 m and 155.5 m and an alternation of sand and kaolinite between 132 m and 120.5 m.

At the biostratigraphic level, micropaleontological data revealed a microfauna rich in calcareous benthic foraminifers with a high abundance of bolivinidae and buliminidae which, despite the rarity of planktonic forms, served to confirm the Maastricht period. The hierarchical tree highlighted a similarity of abundant species in the basin. The environment of Maastrichtian-aged deposits is of the internal to medium platform type.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Ahoure, D. (2021). Contribution of Microfaunistic and Geochemical Analyses to the Sequential Stratigraphy of Maastricht-Aged Deposits in the Eastern Margin of the Ivory Coast Sedimentary Basin (p. 269). Single Doctoral Thesis, Félix Houphouët Boigny University.
[2] Bamba, M. K., Digbehi, Z. B., Sombo, B. C., Goua, T. E., & N’da, L. V. (2011). Planktonic Foraminiferas, Biostratigraphy and Palaeoenvironment of the Ivory Coast Atlantic-Turonian Deposits, West Africa. Palaeobiology Review, 30, 1-11.
[3] Brönnimann, P. T. (1952). Globigerinidae from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Maestrichtian) of Trinidad, B.W.I. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 34, 1-70.
[4] Brotzen, F. (1942). Die Foraminiferengattung Gavelinella nov. gén. et la Systematik des Rotaliiformes. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, 36, 1-60.
[5] Brun, M. (1978). Microfossils of the Côte d’lvoire: The Paleocene and the Cretaceous-Tertiary limit, Contribution of Exoscopy to the Knowledge of Palaeoenvironments (2 Vol., p. 229). Thesis 3˚ Cycle, Univ. Provence, Marseille.
[6] d’Orbigny, A. D. (1826). Tableau méthodique de la classe des Céphalopodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 7, 96-128.
[7] Delage, Y., & Hérouard, E. (1896). Traité de Zoologie Concrète. Tome 1. La Cellule et Les Protozoaires (xxx + 584 p.). Paris, C.Reinwald.
[8] Dieni, I. (1974). Gabonita, a New Name for Gabonella De Klasz, Marie & Meijer, 1960 Non Uvarov, 1940. Journal of Paleontology, 48, 1096.
[9] Dietrich, W. O. (1935). Zur Stratigraphie der Kolumbianischen Ostkordillere. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 1935B, 74-82.
[10] Djeya, K. L., Digbehi, Z. B., Affian, K., Goua, T. E., Kouame, N. J., N’da, L. V., & Yao, K. R. (2010). Contribution of Sedimentological and Microfaunal Studies to the Biostratigrahic and Paleoenvironmental Characterization of Upper Cretaceous Deposits in Côte d’Ivoire. BIOTERRE: International Journal of Life and Earth Sciences, 10, 38-62.
[11] Djrouko, N. Y. N., Yao, N. J-P., Ouattara, I. B. et al. (2021). Biostratigraphy and Palaeoenvironments of Formations in the k/pg Limit of the Grand Lahou Region, West of the Sedimentary Basin of Ivory Coast. Revue Ivoirienne des Sciences et Technologie, 38, 142-165, 24.
[12] Douzo, J. W. D., Amalaman, K. T. S., Dibo, W. B., Yao, N. J. P., Djeya, K. L., Koffi, C. L. et al. (2019). Caracterisation Lithostratigraphique et Sedimentologique des Depôts des Sondages de Fresco et de Grand-Lahou (Sud-Ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire): Essai de Correlation et Paleoenvironnements. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[13] Ehrenberg, C. G. (1838). Über dem blossen Auge unsichtbare Kalkthierchen und Kieselthierchen als Hauptbestandtheile der Kreidegebirge (pp. 192-200). Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.
[14] Elf-Aquitaine Boussens Pau (1977). Sedimentological Characterization Test of Carbonate Deposits: Interpretative Elements (p. 199). Centre Rech. BOUSSENS and PAU, Fascicule 2.
[15] Georgescu, M. D., & Huber, B. T. (2009). Early Evolution of the Cretaceous Serial Planktic Foraminifera (Late Albian-Cenomanian). The Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 39, 335-360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[16] Glaessner, M. F. (1937). Studien über Foraminiferen aus der Kreide und dem Tertiär des Kaukasus; I-Die Foraminiferen der altesten Tertiärschichten des Nord-west-kaukasus. Problems of Paleontology (Laboratory of Paleontology Moscow University), 2-3, 349-410.
[17] González-Donoso, J. M. (1969). Données nouvelles sur la texture et la structure du test de quelques foraminifères du Bassin de Grenade (Espagne). Revue de Micropaléontologie, 12, 3-8.
[18] Goua, T. E. (1997). Biostratigraphy and Paleoenvironmental Evolution of the Maastricht and Paleocene Series in the Coastal Sedimentary Basin (p. 354). Doctoral Thesis, University of Burgundy, Center for Earth Sciences.
[19] Hofker, J. (1953). Types of Genera Described in Part III of the “Siboga Foraminifera”. The Micropaleontologist, 7, 26-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[20] Hofker, J. (1956). Tertiary Foraminifera of Coastal Ecuador—Part II Additional Notes on the Eocene Species. Journal of Palaeontology, 30, 891-958.
[21] Koffi, C. L. (2017). Sequential Stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Deposits of the San-Pedro Margin: Paleoenvironment and Oil Potential (p. 210). Doctoral Thesis, Félix Houphouët Boigny University Abidjan.
[22] Kouassi, A. K., N’goran, J. P. Y., Goha, R. B., Digbehi, Z. B., Bamba, M. K., Goua, E. T., & Kouadio, C. Y. (2013). Micropaleontological and Palaeoenvironmental Characterization Test and Highlighting of the EAO2 at the Cenomanian/Turonian Interface (C/T) in the Sedimentary Basin of Ivory Coast, West Africa. Revue Ivoirienne des Sciences et Technologie, 21-22, 95-118.
[23] Koutsoukos, E. A. M., & Hart, M. B. (1990). Cretaceous Foraminiferal Morphogroup Distribution Patterns, Palaeocommunities and Trophic Structures: A Case Study from the Sergipe Basin, Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 81, 221-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[24] Loeblich, A. R., & Tappan, H. (1986). Some New and Revised Genera and Families of Hyaline Calcareous Foraminiferida (Protozoa). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 105, 239-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[25] Ly, A., & Kuhnt, W. (1994). Late Cretaceous Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblages of the Casamance Shelf (Senegal, NW Africa). Indication of a Late Cretaceous Oxygen Minimum Zone. Micropaleontology Review, 37, 49-74.
[26] M’bani, J. N. (2008). Micropaleontology and Organic Geochemistry of the Congolese Coastal Basin in the Upper Cretaceous: Palaeoecology of Foraminifers, Species and Indicator Associations of Palaeoenvironments of Oil Bedrock (p. 473). University Thesis, Paris 6.
[27] Massala, A. (1993). The Upper Cretaceous and the Tertiary of the Congolese Coastal Basin. Biochronology and Sequential Stratigraphy (p. 326). Doctoral Thesis, University of Burgundy.
[28] Montfort, P. [DENYS DE] (1808-1810). Conchyliologie systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles (pp. lxxxvii + 409). Schoell.
[29] Ouffoue, K. B. (2005). Use of Planktonic Foraminifers for the Characterization of the Turonian in the Onshore Tiémé-1 Oil Well in the Western Part of the Ivorian Sedimentary Basin (p. 60). DEA in Earth Sciences Option Marine Geology, UFR STRM, University of Abidjan.
[30] Reyment, R. A. (1959). Les genres de foraminifères Afrobolivina gen. nov. et Bolivina dans le Crétacé supérieur et le Tertiaire inférieur d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Stockholm Contributions in Geology, 3, 1-57.
[31] Saïdova, K. M. (1981). Sur un système à jour de taxonomie supraspécifique des foraminifères benthoniques du Cénozoïque. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 1-73.
[32] Vail, P. R., Hardenbol, J., & Haq, B. U. (1987). Chronology of Fluctuating Sea Levels since the Triassic. Science, 235, 1156-1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Yao, J. P. (2012). Sedimentological Characterization Mineralogical Geochemical and Bio-Stratigraphic of the Living Cliffs of Fresco Region of Greater Lahou Ivory Coast (p. 203). State Thesis Félix Houphouët Boigny University of Cocody.
[34] Zahoui, D. H. B. (2003). Sedimentological and Biostratigraphic Characterization of Oligosteginid Limestones in the Ivorian Sedimentary Basin (p. 70). DEA in Earth Sciences Option Marine Geology, UFR STRM, Univ. Cocody (Abidjan).

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.