Investigating the Nutritional Value and Bioactive Components of Medicinal Herbs under Various Drying Conditions for Ruminants

Abstract

The research was conducted to investigate the bioactive components and nutritional values of three medicinal herbs: moringa (Moringa oleifera), pineapple waste (Ananas comosus), and plantain (Plantago lanceolata), subjected to three drying methods: sun drying, shade drying, and freeze drying. The research aimed to identify the most effective drying technique for preserving specific bioactive components in these herbs. The experiment was carried out at Bangladesh Agricultural University in Mymensingh and the Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute in Savar. The herb’s proximate components were determined. The total phenolic and flavonoid concentrations in the herbs were measured using a UV spectrophotometer. The specific bioactive compounds from each herb, moringa: kaempferol and myricetin; pineapple waste: gallic acid and catechin; and plantain: aucubin and acteoside, were quantified using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Additionally, the herb’s 24-hour in vitro gas production was also determined in ruminants. The herb’s moisture, ether extract, and ash contents differed significantly (P < 0.05) across the drying methods, with freeze-drying yielding the most favorable results. Higher (P < 0.05) amounts of total phenolic and flavonoid compounds were detected in freeze-dried samples compared to those dried in shade and sun. The particular bioactive components in herbs were significantly (P < 0.05) more in freeze drying compared to shade and sun drying procedures. The freeze-dried herbs showed better in vitro GP24 production, dOM, and ME compared to the others. It can be concluded that freeze-drying is a more effective method for preserving herbs compared to the other two methods for supplementing ruminant diet.

Share and Cite:

Alam, M. , Khandaker, Z. , Talukder, M. , Deb, G. and Al-Mamun, M. (2026) Investigating the Nutritional Value and Bioactive Components of Medicinal Herbs under Various Drying Conditions for Ruminants. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 17, 665-681. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2026.177041.

1. Introduction

People have relied on plants for their therapeutic qualities throughout history. Although this use has generally concentrated on improving human health, plants have also been and continue to be used to increase ruminant production and ethnoveterinary practice [1] [2]. Medicinal herbs contain biologically active substances such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, glycosides, alkaloids, saponins, and tannins. These bioactive compounds are very sensitive and easily influenced by processing methods; thus, minimizing processing loss is necessary. Fresh herbs have enough moisture to degrade their quality over time. They can be processed to make herbs available in various forms throughout the year. The most popular and fundamental method for preserving medicinal plants after harvest is drying, which lowers moisture levels and gets rid of the microbial activity that initially degrades the quality of the herb. It also allows rapid preservation of medicinal properties of plant material in a complex manner. The drying method is a sensitive and crucial step in producing a product of superior quality [3]. Additionally, drying prolongs the shelf life of medicinal herbs by limiting the growth of microbes and preventing certain biochemical activities that could alter the organoleptic properties [4]. To improve the safety, quality, and consistency of finished products, as well as to enhance plant quality, it is imperative to implement high-quality, efficient agricultural and biomass processing systems [5]. There are several methods used for herb drying, such as sun drying [6], shade drying [7], freeze drying [8], and convection hot air drying [6]. It is impossible to forecast how a particular drying technique will affect the preservation of raw quality because it depends on the kinds of chemical compounds and plant types that are present [9]. Since it is widely known that fresh fruit deteriorates quickly, it is best to store it in a dry, cold environment to preserve most of its nutritional content. It is widely acknowledged that storage and processing conditions substantially influence the bioactive compounds in fruits and vegetables, especially phenolic antioxidants, vitamin C, and carotenoids [10]. The choice and application of an effective drying technique are essential for preserving bioactive chemicals in the manufacture of dried samples from natural sources. Yet, drying may adversely affect nutritional and phytochemical components [6] [11]-[13]. To our knowledge, there is scant evidence regarding the impact of various drying techniques on the bioactive compounds of selected medicinal herbs, specifically moringa, pineapple waste, and plantain. Therefore, the study was undertaken to identify the most effective drying technique for preserving specific bioactive components of herbs.

2. Materials and Methods

The Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute and the Bangladesh Agricultural University were the sites of the experiment.

2.1. Collection of Herbs Materials

Plantains (Plantago lanceolata), whole aerial parts, pineapple waste (Ananas comosus), comprising peel and leaf, and moringa (Moringa oleifera) leaves, twigs, and branches were the three herb samples that were collected from the herb bank at the Shahjalal Animal Nutrition Field, Bangladesh Agricultural University. Following the removal of soil and other unnecessary materials, the obtained herb sample was manually cut into pieces measuring 3 to 4 centimeters.

2.2. Preparation of Dried Samples

With certain modifications, fresh herb samples were desiccated to a consistent weight utilizing three distinct drying techniques (sun, shade, and freeze), following the methodology outlined by Nguyen et al. [14]. Three sets of 300 g of waste from moringa, pineapple, and plantain were weighed for sun, freeze, and shade drying. During the sun-drying process, herb samples were exposed to direct sunlight from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm each day under an average temperature of 30.3˚C and relative humidity of 74.9% for seven consecutive days. In the shade drying process, herb samples were placed in a well-ventilated room, spread evenly in an aluminum tray, and dried at 30˚C ± 5˚C and 50% - 70% relative humidity. For consistent drying, the materials were rotated every hour. Shade drying was carried out under natural airflow for a period of 14 days. Freeze drying was conducted at the Feed Safety and Phyto Nutrition Lab of Bangladesh Agricultural University, using a Heto Drywinner freeze drier (Heto-Holten A/S, Allerod, Denmark) to freeze herbs before placement at −50˚C for a duration of 2 to 3 days. After drying, the samples were stored in airtight plastic containers and maintained at room temperature in the nutrition laboratory until analysis was performed.

2.3. Determination of Proximate Components of Herbs Materials

To evaluate the proximate constituents of the three herbs subjected to three distinct drying techniques, samples were desiccated for 24 hours at 105˚C in a forced-air oven and then ground into powder using 1 mm sieve for proximate evaluation. According to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [15], analysis techniques specified that dry matter was assessed by drying at 105˚C for 24 hours, in addition to the examination of crude protein, ether extract, and ash. The technique employed to ascertain acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber was developed by [16].

2.4. Extraction of Herbs Materials

With certain modifications, the method of [17] was used to extract the moringa herb, pineapple waste, and plantains. A 500 mg sample of ground herb was measured into a test tube. Ten milliliters of 80% aqueous methanol were added, and the suspension was gently stirred. The tubes were vortexed for one minute and centrifuged at 1500 g for ten minutes, after which the supernatants were collected. Precipitates were subjected to re-extraction. The combined supernatants served as extracts. The concentrated extracts were subjected to lyophilization and subsequently weighed.

2.5. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

The Folin-Ciocalteu technique was used to determine the total phenolic content of herbal extracts [18]. To put it briefly, 1 milliliter of extract was carefully combined with 2.5 milliliters of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Three milliliters of 2% Na2CO3 were added to the mixture after it had settled for three minutes. The mixture was incubated for two hours at 25˚C and 125 rpm in the dark, and its absorbance at 760 nm was measured using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The total phenolic content was measured in milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of dry matter.

2.6. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The aluminum chloride method was used to measure the total flavonoid concentration [19]. To put it briefly, a volumetric flask measuring 10 milliliters was filled with 1 milliliter of the extracted sample and 4 milliliters of water. Five minutes later, add 0.3 mL of 10% aluminum chloride and 0.3 mL of 5% sodium nitrite. One milliliter of 1 M sodium hydroxide was added to the mixture after it had been incubated for six minutes at room temperature. Distilled water was immediately added to reach the ultimate volume of 10 milliliters. A UV spectrophotometer was used to measure the sample’s absorbance at 510 nm compared to the blank. Using milligrams of quercetin equivalent per gram of dry weight, quercetin was used as the reference. The experiment was conducted thrice to ensure accuracy.

2.7. Determination of Bioactive Compounds

Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography was used to identify two specific bioactive compounds in each of three herbs. The bioactive compounds of moringa herbs (kaempferol, myricetin) were quantified using the methodologies outlined by Shervington et al. [20], the compounds in pineapple waste (gallic acid, catechin) were assessed following the procedures established by Li et al. [21], and the bioactive constituents of plantain herbs (aucubin and acteoside) were analyzed according to the techniques described by Al-Mamun et al. [22].

2.8. In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics

2.8.1. Animal and Diet

One bull with rumen fistulation, which was fed ad libitum Napier grass, was used to obtain fresh rumen fluid. The concentrate mixture accounted for 1.5% of its body weight and contained 33% wheat bran, 20% khesari bran, 15% rice bran, 10% crushed maize, 10% crushed wheat, 5% soybean, 2% vitamin and mineral premix, 1% DCP, 1% salt, and 3% molasses. All the bulls have access to drinking water.

2.8.2. Collection of Rumen Fluid

On the research farm of the Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, rumen fluid was extracted from an animal that had previously been fistulated. The collected rumen liquid was promptly combined, transferred to a preheated 39˚C vacuum flask, purged with CO2, and then quickly capped to preserve anaerobic conditions. The flasks were conveyed to the laboratory in a thermostatic container to maintain a temperature of 39˚C. Four layers of pre-sterilized cheesecloth were used to filter the rumen fluid, and CO2 was continuously flushed to reduce oxygen (O2) exposure.

2.8.3. In Vitro Gas Production Measurement

Using an automated gas production measuring method created by Ankom Technology® (Macedon, NY, USA; ANKOMRF gas production system), the gas production (GP) kinetics of various moringa, pineapple waste, and plantain herbs were assessed [23]. This method tracks gas pressure in several modules, enabling the assessment of ruminal fermentation kinetics.

The system may support up to 50 distinct modules, each of which sends data to a computer via radio frequency. ANKOM pressure sensor modules, which include microchips and radio transmitters (pressure range: −69 to +3447 kPa; resolution: 0.27 kPa; precision: 0.1% of observed readings), are included in each module. This module is housed in a septa glass bottle with a 313-milliliter real capacity. The measured gas pressure was converted into moles of gas using the “ideal” gas law (Equation (1)) and into milliliters (mL) of gas using Avogadro’s equation (Equation (2)).

Number of moles of gas (n) = p(V/RT) (1)

where: n is the amount of gas created in moles (mol), p is the pressure in kilopascals (kPa), V is the headspace volume in the glass container in liters (L), T is the temperature in Kelvin (K), and R is the gas constant (8.314472 L∙kPa/K/mol).

Gas production in milliliters (mL) = n × 22.4 × 1000 (2)

The in vitro fermentation experiment was performed in triplicate for each treatment, with a control module incorporated into the system. Rumen fluid was collected aseptically from a cannulated animal and maintained at 39˚C until use. The same batch of rumen fluid was used for all treatments within each experimental run to minimize variation. The incubation of the target sample was carried out in a module containing 200 mg of respective feedstuff, 80 mL of buffer medium, and 20 mL of rumen fluid as inoculum. As stated by Goering and Van Soest (1970) [24], the buffer medium’s composition included in vitro buffer solution (NH4HCO3, NaHCO3), resazurin 0.1% (w/v) solution, in vitro micro mineral solution (CaCl2∙2H2O, MnCl2∙4H2O, CoCl2∙6H2O, FeCl3∙6H2O), KH2PO4 anhydrous, in vitro macro mineral solution (Na2HPO4 anhydrous, MgSO4∙7H2O), and reducing solution (Cysteine HCl, 1N NaOH, Na2S∙9H2O). All of the glassware, solution, and inoculum were maintained at 39˚C before placing them into the respective module. Finally, all the materials (target sample, buffer medium, and inoculum) were placed into their respective modules, purged with CO2 further, and then placed in a shaking incubator with a temperature of 41˚C and a rotation speed of 100 rpm. The fermentation was carried out until the cumulative gas pressure reached a stationary phase.

According to [25], equations for analyzing nutrients and estimating digestible organic matter and metabolizable energy were based on the gas production (GP) value after 24 hours.

Percentage of digestible organic matter = 15.38 + 0.8453 GP24 + 0.0595 CP + 0.0675 CA

Metabolizable energy (MJ per kilogram DM) = 2.43 + 0.1206 GP24 + 0.0069 CP + 0.0187 CF

where: GP24 denotes gas production (mL per 200 mg DM) within 24 hours of incubation, while CP, CA, and CF stand for crude protein, crude ash, and crude fat, respectively, at g per kilogram DM.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The experiment was conducted using a factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of herb type and drying method. Each herb × drying method combination was replicated independently (n = 3) times.

Data were analyzed using a two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with the following statistical model:

Yijk = Hi + Dj + (HD)ij + εijk

where: Yijk is the observed response variable is the overall mean, Hi is the effect of the ith herb, Dj is the effect of the jth drying method, (HD)ij is the herb × drying method interaction effect, and εijk is the residual error. The data were examined using SPSS 20.0, a statistical program. Additionally, the treatment averages for several parameters were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

3. Results

3.1. Nutrient Composition of Herbs at Different Drying Methods

The nutritional composition of herbs, derived from various drying techniques, is presented in Table 1. The findings indicated that the amount of dry matter of plantain herbs, moringa, and pineapple waste was considerably (P < 0.05) lower in samples that were freeze-dried as opposed to those that were dried in the sun or shade. Crude protein, ADF, and NDF did not significantly differ (P > 0.05) across all herbs under any of the various drying methods. The Ash content of pineapple waste herb was considerably (P < 0.05) lower in freeze drying, followed by shade and sun drying. The ether extract content of plantain herb was (P < 0.05) in freeze drying, followed by shade and sun drying. There was a significant herb × drying method interaction effect on the dry matter (DM) content of all herbs (P < 0.05).

Table 1. Nutritional composition of herbs under three drying methods and the associated herb × drying method interactions.

Herb type

Drying method

SEM

H

D

H × D

Sun

Shade

Freeze

P-value

Moringa

DM

8.62b

10.94a

7.72c

0.482

0.001

0.001

0.001

CP

17.05

17.75

17.86

0.240

0.001

0.405

0.842

ADF

32.78

32.88

32.75

0.180

0.001

0.974

0.904

NDF

49.27

48.40

47.93

0.310

0.001

0.229

0.342

EE

3.58

3.39

3.26

0.070

0.001

0.247

0.991

Ash

8.51

8.41

8.27

0.170

0.001

0.883

0.747

Pineapple waste

DM

8.31b

9.9a

7.76c

0.320

0.001

0.001

0.001

CP

6.94

7.06

7.24

0.060

0.001

0.157

0.842

ADF

31.05

30.79

30.69

0.070

0.001

0.095

0.904

NDF

59.66

58.41

57.97

0.340

0.001

0.108

0.342

EE

2.88

2.69

2.55

0.060

0.001

0.056

0.991

Ash

8.62a

8.17ab

8.07b

0.040

0.001

0.040

0.747

Plantain

DM

9.67a

10.33a

8.53b

0.280

0.001

0.002

0.001

CP

13.94

14.50

14.83

0.231

0.001

0.231

0.842

ADF

26.26

26.03

26.13

0.09

0.001

0.645

0.904

NDF

37.41

37.33

37.40

0.09

0.001

0.952

0.342

EE

2.94a

2.72b

2.66b

0.040

0.001

0.006

0.991

Ash

14.07

14.16

13.99

0.06

0.001

0.586

0.747

DM: Dry matter; CP: Crude Protein; ADF: Acid detergent fibre; NDF: Neutral detergent fibre; H: Herb; D: Drying method; SEM: Standard error of the mean; a - c: Means with different superscripts in the same row differed significantly at P < 0.05.

3.2. Herbs Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Content at Three Different Drying Methods

The total phenolic and flavonoid concentration in herbs subjected to various drying techniques is presented in Table 2. The present findings showed that the concentration of total phenolics and flavonoids in moringa, pineapple waste, and plantain herbs was considerably (P < 0.05) greater in freeze drying compared to shade and sun drying. The results showed that the interaction between herb type and drying method had a significant effect on total phenolic and total flavonoid content of all herbs (P < 0.05).

Table 2. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of herbs as affected by drying method and herb × drying method interaction.

Herb type

Drying method

SEM

H

D

H × D

Sun

Shade

Freeze

P-value

Moringa

Total phenolic (mg/gdw)

3.56c

4.92b

5.96a

0.346

0.001

0.001

0.001

Total flavonoid (mg/gdw)

3.39c

4.29b

5.33a

0.279

0.001

0.001

0.001

Pineapple waste

Total phenolic (mg/gdw)

5.20c

6.62b

6.95a

0.270

0.001

0.001

0.001

Total flavonoid (mg/gdw)

5.92c

6.71b

7.00a

0.16

0.001

0.001

0.001

Plantain

Total phenolic (mg/gdw)

6.15c

8.19b

11.15a

0.73

0.001

0.001

0.001

Total flavonoid (mg/gdw)

4.13c

6.59b

8.61a

0.647

0.001

0.001

0.001

SEM: Standard error of the mean; a - c: Means with different superscripts in the same row differed significantly at P < 0.05.

3.3. Moringa Herb Bioactive Compounds

The bioactive components of the moringa herb are displayed in Table 3. The results indicated that the bioactive component kaempferol was considerably (P < 0.05) elevated in freeze-dried herbs compared to those subjected to shade and sun drying. The bioactive component myricetin was considerably (P < 0.05) increased in freeze-dried moringa herb compared to shade and sun drying.

Table 3. Herbs-specific bioactive compounds at different drying methods.

Herbs

Bioactive compound

Drying method

SEM

P-value

Sun drying

Shade drying

Freeze drying

Moringa

Kaempferol (mg/g)

6.28c

7.20b

7.95a

0.240

<0.001

Myricetin (mg/g)

0.13c

0.15b

0.19a

0.009

<0.001

Pineapple waste

Gallic acid (mg/g)

5.16c

6.06b

6.74a

0.229

<0.001

Catechin (mg/g)

5.40c

6.16b

6.86a

0.212

<0.001

Plantain

Aucubin (mg/g)

3.66c

4.46b

6.29a

0.390

<0.001

Acteoside (mg/g)

22.90c

25.83b

30.84a

1.160

<0.001

SEM: Standard error of the mean; a – c: Means with different superscripts in the same row differed significantly at P < 0.05.

3.4. Pineapple Waste Herb Bioactive Compounds

The pineapple waste herb bioactive compounds are shown in Table 3. The results indicated that the bioactive compound gallic acid was considerably (P < 0.05) elevated in freeze-dried pineapple waste herbs compared to those subjected to shade and sun drying. The bioactive component catechin was considerably (P < 0.05) elevated in freeze-dried herbs compared to those subjected to shade and sun drying.

3.5. Plantain Herb Bioactive Compounds

The plantain herb bioactive compounds are presented in Table 3. The results indicated that the bioactive component aucubin was considerably (P < 0.05) elevated in freeze-dried plantain herb, followed by shade-dried and sun-dried herbs. The bioactive compound of acteoside was also considerably (P < 0.05) greater in herbs that were freeze-dried as opposed to those that were shade and sun-dried.

3.6. In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics of Herbs at Different Drying Methods

The kinetics of in vitro gas production for herbs subjected to various drying processes are illustrated in Table 4. Regarding moringa, the freeze-drying method produced the highest amount of gas at 24 h (25.7 mL), followed by 24.1 mL for shade drying and 14.0 mL for sun drying, which was the lowest (P < 0.001). The digestible organic matter (53.3%) and metabolizable energy (7.35 MJ/kg DM) of the freeze-drying method for moringa were considerably (P < 0.05) superior to those of the other drying techniques. A similar scenario was observed regarding the pineapple waste, where the freeze-drying method was better with GP24, dOM, and ME compared to the other two drying methods. The dOM and ME of plantain using the freeze-drying method were more effective (42.8% & 5.76 MJ per kg DM, respectively) compared to shade drying (42.3% & 5.70 MJ per kg DM, respectively) and sun drying (39.9% & 5.42 MJ per kg DM, respectively) (P < 0.01).

Table 4. In vitro gas production kinetics of herbs at different drying methods.

Herbs

Drying method

GP24

dOM (%)

ME (MJ/kg DM)

Moringa

Sun

14.0c

43.1c

5.94c

Shade

24.1b

52.0b

7.18b

Freeze

25.7a

53.3a

7.35a

SEM

0.08

0.05

0.008

P-value

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

Pineapple waste

Sun

15.8c

38.7c

5.34c

Shade

25.6b

46.7b

6.49b

Freeze

26.6a

47.6a

6.60a

SEM

0.051

0.033

0.201

P-value

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

Plantain

Sun

12.4c

39.9c

5.42c

Shade

14.7b

42.3b

5.70b

Freeze

15.2a

42.8a

5.76a

SEM

0.43

0.45

0.53

P-value

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

GP24: In vitro gas production at 24 h; dOM: Digestible organic matter; ME: Metabolizable energy; SEM: Standard error of the mean; a - c: Means with different superscripts in the same column differed significantly at P < 0.05.

4. Discussion

4.1. Nutrient Composition of Herbs at Different Drying Methods

Drying is the most commonly employed method for prolonging the shelf life of leafy greens. Numerous losses transpire during the drying process, including alterations in the chemical, physical, and nutritional makeup of the leaves. In this study, the amount of dry matter of all herbs was greater in freeze-drying compared to sun and shade drying procedures. The authors [26] stated that drying methods significantly affected the moisture content, antioxidant activity, and concentrations of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in herbs. This outcome aligned with the findings of [27], who determined that the dry matter content of shade-dried moringa herb samples exceeded that of sun and cabinet drying methods. However, [28] reported that Cabinet dried moringa samples were better than others, and they had the highest nutrient retention, followed by shadow, sun drying and oven dried samples. The impact of several drying techniques, including oven, sun, shade, and freeze-drying, was examined. It was observed that freeze-drying was the most efficient method for nutrient retention and moisture removal, whereas sun drying was the least effective method [29]. Regarding the crude protein, ADF, NDF, and ash content of herbs, the results of the current investigation showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) across the various drying methods. The researcher of [30] [31] indicates that elevated temperatures and extended exposure can affect protein content through the denaturation of protein structures. Additionally, they observed a notable reduction in protein alongside an elevation in fiber and ash content in the moringa plant with extended duration and elevated temperature. The authors also stated that the drying of vegetables leads to the breakdown of nutrients [32].

4.2. Herbs Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Content at Three Different Drying Methods

Phenolic molecules in plants are linked to antioxidant and anticancer activities [33] [34]. Consequently, preserving phenolic chemicals during the drying, extraction, and isolation processes is crucial. The overall flavonoid and phenolic flavonoid content of herbs in the current investigation was greater in freeze-drying compared to shade and sun-drying procedures. The findings of the present study align with earlier studies on persimmon and pomegranate peel, indicating that the freeze-drying method preserves a greater concentration of total phenolic, flavonoid, and antioxidant capacity compared to conventional drying techniques [8] [35]. Freeze-drying was the most promising approach for retaining the nutraceutical qualities of moringa leaf when compared to sun drying and oven drying [36]. Different drying procedures dramatically changed the phytoconstituents (phenolics, flavonoids) of herbs. This is consistent with the results of [37], who found that freeze-dried samples of Moringa stenopetala leaf exhibited superior total phenolic and flavonoid concentration than samples prepared using other techniques. The drying process was significantly influenced by the total phenolic and flavonoid concentration of Moringa oliefera leaf [38]. The quality of moringa powder derived from shade drying exceeded that obtained from sun drying and oven drying [39]. For plantain herbs, TPC and TFC of Plantago lanceolata leaf were significantly altered by the various drying methods (sunlight, thermostatic oven, and shade), whereas shade-drying was preferred to the others concerning the phytochemical content of dried samples [40]. The processing treatments and environmental factors, including temperature and light intensity, can influence phenolic content, while the authors recommended oven drying as a superior method for preserving phenolic compounds in albedo [41]. The TPC and TFC of Allium hirtifolium slices were found to be highest in the freeze-dried samples [42]. The investigation found that the total phenolic concentration in moringa leaf was lower, as stated by [43] [44], which were 32.90 mg per gram and 45.81 mg per gram, respectively.

4.3. Bioactive Content of Herbs at Different Drying Methods

Since freeze-drying extracts more bioactive components than other drying methods that employ heat, it is thought to be one of the most accurate methods for maintaining the nutrients and color quality of food products [45] [46]. The current findings of kaempferol, bioactive compound of freeze-dried moringa leaf extract, were slightly lower than the findings by several researchers [47] [48]. The bioactive constituents of moringa plants had concentrations of myricetin and kaempferol that varied from 406 - 2699 mg per kilogram & 1730 - 3440 mg per kilogram, each, and this was greater than the present findings. These may be due to the origin of moringa herbs from different geographical locations. The findings of [20] indicated that refluxing moringa leaves with a solution of 0.10 M hydrochloric acid for 24 hours yielded flavonols, specifically kaempferol (133 mg/kg) and myricetin (292 mg/kg), with myricetin being marginally higher and kaempferol lower than the current results. The content of bioactive compounds in pineapple waste was found to increase after drying [49]. Researchers have compared the drying of freeze, microwave, and infrared with traditional techniques like hot air, solar, tray, oven, and vacuum drying, examining the phytochemical losses in fruits during the drying process [50]-[53]. The drying process can significantly influence the quality of herbs by affecting their physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds [54]. The best drying techniques for maintaining or boosting phytochemicals in dried fruits were found to be infrared and freeze drying. Heat sensitivity is a well-known characteristic of numerous phytochemicals, including some polyphenols. The current findings corroborated those of a prior study on the bioactive substances in narrow-leaf plantains, which were sensitive to various drying methods [55]. The iridoid glycosides catapol and aucubin of Plantago lanceolata dropped by 50% and 25%, respectively, after the leaves were dried for 8 hours at 60˚C in comparison to the fresh biomass. The best method for maintaining the maximum concentration of bioactive compounds in African eggplants is freeze drying [56]. Freeze-drying is superior to oven-drying because the latter was discovered to cause the degradation of bioactive substances in plants due to the impacts of heat treatment [57].

4.4. In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics of Herbs at Different Drying Methods

For assessing the fermentation characteristics of different feedstuffs, including herbs, in vitro gas production is a crucial technique. The present study observed the highest gas production volume in freeze-drying herbs, followed by shade and sun drying. The specific bioactive compounds of different herbs were also found to be higher in freeze drying than in shade and sun drying methods. The various processing techniques may have influenced their chemical composition and, consequently, their digestibility, which could be responsible for the variation in gas production. The authors obtained that starch and gas generation correlated positively, while NDF content and gas production were negatively correlated [58]. In vitro gas production and associated parameters are known to be influenced by the nutritional composition of feedstuffs [59]. Moreover, cumulative gas generation may also vary due to variations in botanical fractions (i.e., tops, leaves, stems) and levels of anti-nutritional constituents, such as tannins [60] [61]. Freeze-drying preserves phenolic components such as tannins and flavonoids in herbs more effectively than shade or sun-drying. These chemicals create tannin-protein complexes that are resistant to breakdown in the rumen, hence enhancing the availability of digestible bypass protein for animal feeding [62].

5. Conclusion

It can be concluded that freeze-drying is a more effective method for preserving herbs compared to the other two methods, as it exhibits higher levels of total phenolic, flavonoid, and bioactive compounds. It also shows superior in vitro digestibility in ruminants. It is recommended that an in vivo study be required to validate the in vitro data on supplementing herbs in the ruminant diet, which will increase feed efficiency and diminish greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Committee for Animal Use and Ethics at the Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute approved all experimental protocols related to animal research (Memo No. T-4/(Part-6) 2015/1799; Date: 13/12/2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Geraci, J.I., Garciarena, A.D., Gagliostro, G.A., Beauchemin, K.A. and Colombatto, D. (2012) Plant Extracts Containing Cinnamaldehyde, Eugenol and Capsicum Oleoresin Added to Feedlot Cattle Diets: Ruminal Environment, Short Term Intake Pattern and Animal Performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 176, 123-130.[CrossRef]
[2] Jayasena, D.D. and Jo, C. (2013) Essential Oils as Potential Antimicrobial Agents in Meat and Meat Products: A Review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 34, 96-108.[CrossRef]
[3] Kubra, I.R. and Rao, L.J.M. (2012) An Impression on Current Developments in the Technology, Chemistry, and Biological Activities of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 52, 651-688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Sellami, I.H., Wannes, W.A., Bettaieb, I., Berrima, S., Chahed, T., Marzouk, B., et al. (2011) Qualitative and Quantitative Changes in the Essential Oil of Laurus nobilis L. Leaves as Affected by Different Drying Methods. Food Chemistry, 126, 691-697.[CrossRef]
[5] Leong, W.H., Teh, S.Y., Hossain, M.M., Nadarajaw, T., Zabidi-Hussin, Z., Chin, S., et al. (2020) Application, Monitoring and Adverse Effects in Pesticide Use: The Importance of Reinforcement of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Journal of Environmental Management, 260, Article ID: 109987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Nguyen, V.T., Van Vuong, Q., Bowyer, M.C., Van Altena, I.A. and Scarlett, C.J. (2015) Effects of Different Drying Methods on Bioactive Compound Yield and Antioxidant Capacity of Phyllanthus amarus. Drying Technology, 33, 1006-1017.[CrossRef]
[7] Orphanides, A., Goulas, V. and Gekas, V. (2015) Drying Technologies: Vehicle to High-Quality Herbs. Food Engineering Reviews, 8, 164-180.[CrossRef]
[8] Karaman, S., Toker, O.S., Çam, M., Hayta, M., Doğan, M. and Kayacier, A. (2014) Bioactive and Physicochemical Properties of Persimmon as Affected by Drying Methods. Drying Technology, 32, 258-267.[CrossRef]
[9] Lin, L., Lei, F., Sun, D., Dong, Y., Yang, B. and Zhao, M. (2012) Thermal Inactivation Kinetics of Rabdosia serra (Maxim.) Hara Leaf Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase and Comparative Evaluation of Drying Methods on Leaf Phenolic Profile and Bioactivities. Food Chemistry, 134, 2021-2029.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Sultana, B., Anwar, F., Ashraf, M. and Saari, N. (2012) Effect of Drying Techniques on the Total Phenolic. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6, 161-167.
[11] Nadi, F. (2017) Bioactive Compound Retention in Echium amoenum Fisch. & C. A. Mey. Petals: Effect of Fluidized Bed Drying Conditions. International Journal of Food Properties, 20, 2249-2260.[CrossRef]
[12] Nguyen, K.Q., Vuong, Q.V., Nguyen, M.H. and Roach, P.D. (2018) The Effects of Drying Conditions on Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of the Australian Maroon Bush, Scaevola spinescens. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 42, e13711.[CrossRef]
[13] Pham, H.N.T., Nguyen, V.T., Vuong, Q.V., Bowyer, M.C. and Scarlett, C.J. (2015) Effect of Extraction Solvents and Drying Methods on the Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Helicteres hirsuta Lour. Leaves. Technologies, 3, 285-301.[CrossRef]
[14] Nguyen, V.T., Ueng, J.P. and Tsai, G.J. (2011) Proximate Composition, Total Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Seagrape (Caulerpa lentillifera). Journal of Food Science, 76, C950-C958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] AOAC, C.A. (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Edition, AOAC.
[16] Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991) Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kähkönen, M.P., Hopia, A.I., Vuorela, H.J., Rauha, J., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T.S., et al. (1999) Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts Containing Phenolic Compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 3954-3962.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Slinkard, K. and Singleton, V.L. (1977) Total Phenol Analysis: Automation and Comparison with Manual Methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 28, 49-55.[CrossRef]
[19] Olajire, A.A. and Azeez, L. (2011) Total Antioxidant Activity, Phenolic, Flavonoid and Ascorbic Acid Contents of Nigerian Vegetables. African Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2, 22-29.
[20] Shervington, L.A., Li, B.S., Shervington, A.A., Alpan, N., Patel, R., Muttakin, U., et al. (2018) A Comparative HPLC Analysis of Myricetin, Quercetin and Kaempferol Flavonoids Isolated from Gambian and Indian Moringa oleifera Leaves. International Journal of Chemistry, 10, 28-37.[CrossRef]
[21] Li, T., Shen, P., Liu, W., Liu, C., Liang, R., Yan, N., et al. (2014) Major Polyphenolics in Pineapple Peels and Their Antioxidant Interactions. International Journal of Food Properties, 17, 1805-1817.[CrossRef]
[22] Al-Mamun, M., Abe, D., Kofujita, H., Tamura, Y. and Sano, H. (2008) Comparison of the Bioactive Components of the Ecotypes and Cultivars of Plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) Herbs. Animal Science Journal, 79, 83-88.[CrossRef]
[23] ANKOM (2011) ANKOM Gas Production System Operator’s Manual.
https://www.ankom.com/search?query=ANKOM%20gas%20production%20system%20operator%E2%80%99s%20manual.%20
[24] Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agriculture Handbook No. 379.
[25] Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H. (1988) Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtained from Chemical Analysis and Gas Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28, 7-55.
[26] Shalaby, N.A., Attallah, K.M., Omar, A.A. and Aboabdo, B.M. (2026) Study of Drying Techniques on Various Types of Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5, 66-74.[CrossRef]
[27] Setiaboma, W., Kristanti, D. and Herminiati, A. (2019) The Effect of Drying Methods on Chemical and Physical Properties of Leaves and Stems Moringa oleifera Lam. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Applied Chemistry, Tangerang, 23-24 October 2019, 2175.[CrossRef]
[28] Satwase, A.N., Pandhre, G.R., Sirsat, P.G. and Wade, Y.R. (2013) Studies on Drying Characteristics and Nutritional Composition of Drumstick Leaves by Using Sun, Shadow, Cabinet and Oven Drying Methods. Open Access Scientific Reports, 2, 584-587.
[29] Umar, Y.B., Isyaku, A.H., Mohammed-Dabo, I.A., Bilal, S., Mashi, A.H. and Adamu, M.S. (2015) Effect of Drying Techniques on the Nutrients of Moringa Leaves. Federal University of Technology, 3, 55-60.
[30] Dolma, N. and Tashi, S. (2020) Effect of Drying Time and Temperature Moringa oleifera. Research Journal of Agriculture, 8, 34-39.
[31] Meyerzon, M. (2012) The Effects of Heat on Protein Food.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=The%20effects%20of%20heat%20on%20protein%20food.&author=Meyerzon%20M.%20(2012)
[32] Derossi, A., Cassi, D. and Severini, C. (2011) Mass Transfer Mechanisms during Dehydration of Vegetable Food: Traditional and Innovative Approaches. In: Advanced Topics in Mass Transfer, Intech, 306-354.
[33] Dai, J. and Mumper, R.J. (2010) Plant Phenolics: Extraction, Analysis and Their Antioxidant and Anticancer Properties. Molecules, 15, 7313-7352.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Khoddami, A., Wilkes, M.A. and Roberts, T.H. (2013) Techniques for Analysis of Plant Phenolic Compounds. Molecules, 18, 2328-2375.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Mphahlele, R.R., Fawole, O.A., Makunga, N.P. and Opara, U.L. (2016) Effect of Drying on the Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Antityrosinase Activities of Pomegranate Peel. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 16, Article No. 143.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Ademiluyi, A.O., Aladeselu, O.H., Oboh, G. and Boligon, A.A. (2018) Drying Alters the Phenolic Constituents, Antioxidant Properties, α-Amylase, and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Properties of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) Leaf. Food Science & Nutrition, 6, 2123-2133.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Dadi, D.W., Emire, S.A., Hagos, A.D. and Assamo, F.T. (2018) Influences of Different Drying Methods and Extraction Solvents on Total Phenolic and Flavonoids, and Antioxidant Capacity of Moringa stenopetala Leaves. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7, 962-967.
[38] Iwansyah, A.C., Manh, T.D., Andriana, Y., Aiman bin Hessan, M., Kormin, F., Cuong, D.X., et al. (2020) Effects of Various Drying Methods on Selected Physical and Antioxidant Properties of Extracts from Moringa oleifera Leaf Waste. Sustainability, 12, Article No. 8586.[CrossRef]
[39] Kannan, K. and Thahaaseen, A. (2016) Process Optimization for Drying of Drumstick Leaves. Indian Journal of Science, 23, 275-288.
https://indianjournals.com/article/ijs2-23-79-013
[40] Ergün, F. (2023) Effects of Drying Methods on Amounts of Phenolic and Flavonoid Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Plantago lanceolata L. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 33, 159-165.[CrossRef]
[41] Shah, N.N.A.K., Shamsuddin, R., Rahman, R.A. and Adzahan, N.M. (2014) Effects of Physicochemical Characteristics of Pummelo Fruit Juice towards UV Inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2, 43-52.[CrossRef]
[42] Poorgharib, M., Mehrjerdi, M.Z. and Arabhosseini, A. (2023) Effect of Different Drying Methods on Antioxidant and Phytochemical Yield of Allium hirtifolium Boiss. Eco-Phytochemical Journal of Medicinal Plants, 10, 27-43.
[43] Peñalver, R., Martínez-Zamora, L., Lorenzo, J.M., Ros, G. and Nieto, G. (2022) Nutritional and Antioxidant Properties of Moringa oleifera Leaves in Functional Foods. Foods, 11, Article No. 1107.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Sreelatha, S. and Padma, P.R. (2009) Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Moringa oleifera Leaves in Two Stages of Maturity. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 64, 303-311.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Dorta, E., Lobo, M.G. and González, M. (2012) Using Drying Treatments to Stabilise Mango Peel and Seed: Effect on Antioxidant Activity. LWTFood Science and Technology, 45, 261-268.[CrossRef]
[46] Pinela, J., Barros, L., Dueñas, M., Carvalho, A.M., Santos-Buelga, C. and Ferreira, I.C.F.R. (2012) Antioxidant Activity, Ascorbic Acid, Phenolic Compounds and Sugars of Wild and Commercial Tuberaria lignosa Samples: Effects of Drying and Oral Preparation Methods. Food Chemistry, 135, 1028-1035.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Atawodi, S.E., Atawodi, J.C., Idakwo, G.A., Pfundstein, B., Haubner, R., Wurtele, G., et al. (2010) Evaluation of the Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Properties of Methanol Extracts of the Leaves, Stem, and Root Barks of Moringa oleifera Lam. Journal of Medicinal Food, 13, 710-716.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Siddhuraju, P. and Becker, K. (2003) Antioxidant Properties of Various Solvent Extracts of Total Phenolic Constituents from Three Different Agroclimatic Origins of Drumstick Tree (Moringa oleifera Lam.) Leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 2144-2155.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] da Silva, D.I.S., Nogueira, G.D.R., Duzzioni, A.G. and Barrozo, M.A.S. (2013) Changes of Antioxidant Constituents in Pineapple (Ananas comosus) Residue during Drying Process. Industrial Crops and Products, 50, 557-562.[CrossRef]
[50] Heras-Ramírez, M.E., Quintero-Ramos, A., Camacho-Dávila, A.A., Barnard, J., Talamás-Abbud, R., Torres-Muñoz, J.V., et al. (2012) Effect of Blanching and Drying Temperature on Polyphenolic Compound Stability and Antioxidant Capacity of Apple Pomace. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5, 2201-2210.[CrossRef]
[51] Bchir, B., Besbes, S., Karoui, R., Attia, H., Paquot, M. and Blecker, C. (2012) Effect of Air-Drying Conditions on Physico-Chemical Properties of Osmotically Pre-Treated Pomegranate Seeds. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5, 1840-1852.[CrossRef]
[52] Rafiq, S., Singh, B. and Gat, Y. (2019) Effect of Different Drying Techniques on Chemical Composition, Color and Antioxidant Properties of Kinnow (Citrus reticulata) Peel. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56, 2458-2466.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Liu, H., Liu, J., Lv, Z., Yang, W., Zhang, C., Chen, D., et al. (2019) Effect of Dehydration Techniques on Bioactive Compounds in Hawthorn Slices and Their Correlations with Antioxidant Properties. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56, 2446-2457.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Tamura, Y. and Nishibe, S. (2002) Changes in the Concentrations of Bioactive Compounds in Plantain Leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 2514-2518.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Massarioli, A.P., de Alencar, S.M., Siqueira, A.F., de Melo, M.P., Vidigal, I.G. and Ferreira, A.L.G. (2023) Evaluation of the Quality and Antioxidant Activity of Dehydrated Medicinal Herbs. Horticulturae, 9, Article No. 597.[CrossRef]
[56] Mbondo, N.N., Owino, W.O., Ambuko, J. and Sila, D.N. (2018) Effect of Drying Methods on the Retention of Bioactive Compounds in African Eggplant. Food Science & Nutrition, 6, 814-823.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Chan, E.W.C., Lim, Y.Y., Wong, S.K., Lim, K.K., Tan, S.P., Lianto, F.S., et al. (2009) Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Antioxidant Properties of Leaves and Tea of Ginger Species. Food Chemistry, 113, 166-172.[CrossRef]
[58] De Boever, J.L., Aerts, J.M., Vanacker, J.M. and De Brabander, D.L. (2005) Evaluation of the Nutritive Value of Maize Silages Using a Gas Production Technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123, 255-265.[CrossRef]
[59] Kılıç, Ü. and Sarıcicek, B.Z. (2006) Factors Affecting the Results of Gas Production Technique. Journal of Animal Production, 47, 54-61.
[60] Larbi, A., Khatib-Salkin, A., Jammal, B. and Hassan, S. (2011) Seed and Forage Yield, and Forage Quality Determinants of Nine Legume Shrubs in a Non-Tropical Dryland Environment. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 163, 214-221.[CrossRef]
[61] Njidda, A.A. and Nasiru, A. (2010) In Vitro Gas Production and Dry Matter Digestibility of Tannin-Containing Forges of Semi-Arid Region of North-Eastern Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9, 60-66.[CrossRef]
[62] McSweeney, C.S., Palmer, B., McNeill, D.M. and Krause, D.O. (2001) Microbial Interactions with Tannins: Nutritional Consequences for Ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 91, 83-93.[CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.