The Role of the Three Delays in Maternal Deaths at the University Hospital Center of Kara (CHU-Kara/Togo) from 2023 to 2025

Abstract

Maternal mortality is a major public health problem. The objective of this study was to identify and analyze the different types of delays involved in the occurrence of maternal deaths at CHU-Kara. Methodology: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025, over a period of 3 years, focusing on cases of maternal deaths at CHU-Kara. Results: During the study period, 49 maternal deaths were recorded. The mean age was 27.4 years ± 6.9 years. The majority (89.8%) were referred/evacuated. Direct causes predominate among maternal deaths, representing 53.1% of cases. Arterial hypertension with its complications (46.2%) and hemorrhagic causes (30.8%) were predominant. The first, second, and third delays were involved in 71.4%, 34.7%, and 61.2% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: The three delays, particularly the first and third, were implicated in maternal deaths, highlighting the need to strengthen awareness, access to emergency obstetric care, and quality of management.

Share and Cite:

Logbo-Akey, K. , Kambote, Y. , Amewouho, K. , Lare, S. , Ajavon, D. and Aboubakari, A. (2026) The Role of the Three Delays in Maternal Deaths at the University Hospital Center of Kara (CHU-Kara/Togo) from 2023 to 2025. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16, 847-856. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2026.166079.

1. Introduction

Maternal mortality is a major public health problem. On a global scale, the maternal mortality rate is estimated at 197 deaths per 100,000 live births (LB) in 2023, with significant regional disparities [1]. It remains particularly high in sub-Saharan Africa, with a rate of 447 per 100,000 LB, compared to less than 10 per 100,000 LB in Europe [1] [2]. These high mortality rates observed in Africa are largely explained by the persistence of the three delays: the delay in the decision to seek care, the delay in accessing health facilities, and the delay in receiving adequate care [3]. In order to contribute to the reduction of mortality, we conducted this study with the main objective of identifying and analyzing the different types of delays involved in the occurrence of maternal deaths at CHU-Kara.

2. Method

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the gynecology and obstetrics department of the University Hospital Center of Kara (CHU-Kara). The CHU-Kara is located in the Kara region, in the northern part of Togo, and is one of the three university hospital centers in the country. The study took place over a period of 3 years, from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025. It was based on the analysis of medical records of women who died from obstetric complications. The data, extracted from these records, were entered via an electronic form in xlsx format on the Kobo Toolbox platform, then cleaned using Excel 2021 software and analyzed using Epi Info software version 7.2.7.0. The study population included all recorded maternal deaths. Included were the records of women who died during pregnancy or within 42 days after its termination, regardless of the duration or location, from any cause determined by or aggravated by the pregnancy or the care it motivated, but neither accidental nor incidental, at CHU-Kara during our study period, in accordance with the WHO definition [4].

The causes of death were assigned according to the conclusions documented in the medical records. Delays were defined according to the three-delay model: first delay or delay 1 (delay in the decision to seek care), second delay or delay 2 (delay in accessing care), and third delay or delay 3 (delay in receiving care) [3]. These delays were identified based on the information documented in the medical records. Multiple delays could be attributed to the same patient when supported by the findings in the medical records.

The collected data were kept confidential and anonymous for all patients.

3. Results

We recorded 49 maternal deaths out of 8079 live births during the study period, corresponding to a mortality rate of 606 per 100,000 live births.

3.1. Socio-Demographic Profile of the Patients

The mean age of the patients was 27.4 years ± 6.9 years, with extremes of 17 and 40 years; the age group 18 - 23 represented 30.6%. The patients were uneducated (40.8%), housewives (51.1%), and resided in rural areas (65.3%) (Table 1).

3.2. Obstetric History and Associated Pathologies

The deceased patients had made fewer than 4 prenatal contacts (53.1%). The associated pathologies were arterial hypertension (43.7%), viral hepatitis B (25.0%), and sickle cell disease (18.7%) (Table 2).

Table 1. Distribution of patients according to socio-demographic characteristics.

No.

Percentage

Age (years)

<18 years

1

2.0

18 - 23

15

30.6

24 - 29

11

22.5

30 - 35

10

20.4

>35

12

24.5

Total

49

100.00

Education Level

No Formal Education

20

40.8

Primary

14

28.6

Secondary

13

26.5

Higher Education

2

4.1

Total

49

100.00

Occupation

Students

3

6.1

Housewives

25

51.1

Salaried Employee

1

2.0

Farmer

1

2.0

Vendors

9

18.4

Artisan

10

20.4

Total

49

100.00

Residence

Urban

17

34.7

Rural

32

65.3

Total

49

100.00

Table 2. Distribution of patients according to obstetric history and associated pathologies.

No.

Percentage

Gravidity

Primigravida

18

36.7

Paucigravida

13

26.6

Multigravida

18

36.7

Total

100.0

Parity

Nullipara

18

36.7

Primipara

09

18.5

Paucipara

11

22.4

Multipara

11

22.4

Total

49

100.0

Number of Prenatal Contacts

0

08

16.3

[1 - 4]

18

36.7

[4 - 8]

22

44.9

≥8

01

02.1

Total

49

100.0

Associated Pathologies

Hepatitis B

04

25.0

Sickle Cell Disease

03

18.7

HIV

01

06.3

Diabetes

01

06.3

Arterial Hypertension

07

43.7

Total

16

100.0

3.3. Mode of Admission and Mode of Transport

The patients were referred/evacuated (89.8%). The ambulance was used in 32.7% of cases (Table 3).

Table 3. Distribution of women according to mode of admission and means of transportation.

No.

Percentage

Mode of Admission

Came on their own

05

10.2

Referred/evacuated

44

89.8

Total

49

100.0

Means of Transportation

Ambulance

16

32.7

Taxi

21

42.8

Motorcycle

10

20.4

Personal vehicle

02

04.1

Total

49

100.0

3.4. Distance and Referral Duration

The average distance traveled was 45.2 kilometers. The patients were admitted to CHU Kara on average 24.8 hours after their referral.

3.5. Clinical Data of Patients at Admission

The general condition was altered in 75.5% of cases, and 46.9% of patients had a poor level of consciousness (Table 4).

Table 4. Distribution of patients according to general condition and state of consciousness.

No.

Percentage

General Condition

Good

12

24.5

Poor

37

75.5

Total

49

100.0

State of consciousness

Good

26

53.1

Poor

23

46.9

Total

49

100.0

3.6. Time of Death

The death occurred in the postpartum period (55.1%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Distribution of patients according to the time of death.

3.7. Causes of Death

Direct causes predominate among maternal deaths, representing 53.1% of cases. Arterial hypertension with its complications (46.2%) and hemorrhagic causes (30.8%) are predominant (Table 5).

Table 5. Distribution of women according to the cause of death.

No.

Percentage

Direct Obstetric Causes

26

53.1

Preeclampsia/Eclampsia

12

46.2

Hemorrhage

8

30.8

Infection

6

23.0

Indirect Obstetric Causes

23

46.9

Anemia

11

47.9

Acute Complications of Sickle Cell Disease

4

17.5

Hepatic Cirrhosis

2

08.8

Anesthesia Complication

1

04.3

Ophidian Envenomation

1

04.3

Human Rabies

1

04.3

Acute Polyradiculoneuritis

1

04.3

Diabetic Ketoacidosis

1

04.3

HIV/AIDS

1

04.3

Total

49

100.0

3.8. The Identified Delays

The first delay was identified in 71.4% of cases (Table 6).

Table 6. Distribution of patients according to the type of delay.

No.

Percentage

Delay 1

35

71.4

Delay 2

17

34.7

Delay 3

30

61.2

3.9. Determinants of Delays

The main factor identified for the first delay was the absence or insufficient antenatal care visits in 53.1% of cases (Table 7).

Table 7. Distribution of patients according to the determinants of delay.

No.

Percentage

Elements in Favor of the First Delay

Admission in critical condition

30

61.2

Consultation delay > 24 hours

24

49.0

Home delivery

06

12.2

Insufficient prenatal contacts

26

53.1

Elements in Favor of the Second Delay

Long referral delay

13

26.5

More than two facilities visited

12

24.5

Elements in Favor of the Third Delay

Lack of staff

06

12.2

Lack of blood

07

14.3

Lack of equipment

11

22.4

Delay in care

06

12.2

Delay in diagnosis

03

6.1

Insufficient monitoring

09

18.4

4. Discussion

4.1. Socio-Demographic Profile of the Patients

The mean age of the patients was 27.4 ± 6.9 years, with a predominance in the 18 - 23 age group, representing 30.6% of cases. Thus, it involved a relatively young population. Several authors have reported similar results in the sub-region. For instance, Padonou et al. in Benin and Alkassoum et al. in Niger reported mean ages of 29.6 and 26 years, respectively [5] [6]. The extremes of reproductive age, particularly young age, are recognized as risk factors for maternal mortality [6] [7] [8]. More than half of the women were educated, but they were housewives in 51.1% of cases. Timsal in Pakistan reported a similar proportion (54.8%) of educated women [9]. In contrast, Diassama et al. in Mali reported a very high proportion of uneducated women (98.8%), also predominantly housewives [10]. The non-negligible education rate observed in our study could be explained by the various policies and actions implemented by the Togolese government in favor of literacy and girls’ education, considered an essential lever for improving maternal health. However, despite this relatively satisfactory level of education, the economic and social empowerment of women remains limited, as evidenced by the high proportion of housewives (51.1%).

4.2. The Delays

In our study, the most frequent delay was the first delay. The women experienced the first delay in 71.4% of cases. This rate is very high compared to the 37% and 6.3% reported respectively by Diassama et al. in Mali and Mohammed et al. in Egypt [10] [11]. This result highlights the importance of the delay in deciding to seek care, considered one of the main determinants of maternal mortality in low-resource countries. This delay typically occurs between the onset of the first signs of complications and the decision to consult an appropriate health facility. Several factors could explain this high frequency of the first delay in our context. On one hand, the low economic and decision-making empowerment of women observed in our study could limit their ability to seek care quickly, as nearly half of the women were housewives without income. In many families, the decision to seek care still depends on the spouse or family environment, thereby delaying access to health facilities [12] [13]. On the other hand, the low level of knowledge about danger signs, as highlighted by Duysburgh et al., can lead to an underestimation of symptom severity [14]. This argument is supported by the high rate of primigravidas (36.7%) recorded in our study. All these factors lead to late consultation, often more than 24 hours after the onset of symptoms, and frequently in a state of poor general condition in 75,5% of cases. The high proportion of the first delay observed in our study thus underscores the need to strengthen community-based interventions focused on health education for women and families, particularly on the early recognition of obstetric danger signs. Involving spouses and community leaders, developing financing mechanisms for obstetric emergencies, and improving women’s empowerment could significantly reduce this delay and, consequently, maternal morbidity and mortality.

The second delay and especially the third delay also represented significant proportions (34.7% and 61.2%). While the first delay was the most prevalent in our study, this was not the case in the studies by David et al. and Mohammed et al., who reported the third delay as the most important in 69.7% and 34.8% of cases, respectively [11] [15]. Muriithi et al. also reported a predominance of the third delay [16]. Our rate of the third delay is likely underestimated, as the third delay was analyzed at the referral site, which is CHU-Kara. If the analysis of the third delay had focused on the first referral center, the rate would have been higher, since 44 women, or 89.8%, were referred or evacuated. This high proportion of referrals indirectly highlights the inadequacies of the peripheral health system, particularly in terms of capacity to manage obstetric emergencies, availability of qualified staff, and adequate technical platforms—key determinants of this delay. This difference prompts reflection on expanding the classic three-delays model to include the six delays: delay in seeking initial care, delay in reaching initial care, delay in initial management, delay in seeking referral care, delay in reaching referral care, and delay in management at the referral level [17].

4.3. Study Limitations

This was a monocentric study conducted exclusively at Kara University Teaching Hospital, which limits the generalizability of the findings. In addition, the identification of delays based on medical records may introduce classification bias.

5. Conclusion

This study identified the three delays in the occurrence of maternal mortality, with a predominance of the first delay related to the decision to seek care. These delays promote late consultation, often at a severe stage of the pathology, thereby compromising the maternal prognosis. These results underscore the need to strengthen population awareness, improve access to emergency obstetric care, and optimize the quality of management in order to reduce maternal mortality.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division (2025) Trends in Maternal Mortality: 2000 to 2023. WHO.
[2] Diguisto, C., Saucedo, M., Kallianidis, A., Bloemenkamp, K., Bødker, B., Buoncristiano, M., et al. (2022) Maternal Mortality in Eight European Countries with Enhanced Surveillance Systems: Descriptive Population Based Study. BMJ, 379, e070621.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Thaddeus, S. and Maine, D. (1994) Too Far to Walk: Maternal Mortality in Context. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1091-1110.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] World Health Organization (2013) Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Technical Guidance Information for Action to Prevent Maternal Death.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506083
[5] Padonou, S.G.R., et al. (2026) Mortalité maternelle: Épidémiologie du troisième retard chez les femmes référées dans deux hôpitaux de Cotonou (Bénin) entre 2017 et 2021. Revue Africaine des Sciences Sociales et de la Santé Publique, 8, 72-86.
[6] Alkassoum, I., Djibo, I., Hama, Y., Abdoulwahabou, A.M. and Amadou, O. (2018) Risk Factors for In-Hospital Maternal Mortality in the Region of Maradi, Niger (2008-2010): A Retrospective Study of 7 Regional Maternity Units. Médecine et Santé Tropicales, 28, 86-91.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Tebeu, P.M., Kouma, L., Obama, A., et al. (2002) Quel serait l’âge de la parité précoce chez les adolescentes au Cameroun: 5 années d’expérience (CHU Yaoundé). Médecine dAfrique Noire, 49, 439-442.
[8] Mendoua, M.F., Ndolo, A.R., Ekono, M., Essome, H. and Mboudou, E. (2025) The Burden of Geriatric Pregnancies: Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in a Cameroonian Referral Hospital. Advances in Reproductive Sciences, 13, 391-400.[CrossRef]
[9] Timsal, R. (2026) Health-System Failures and Maternal Deaths in Pakistan: Testing the Three Delays Model Using PMMS Data. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 576-594.[CrossRef]
[10] Diassana, M., Dembele, S., Macalou, B., Ndaou, K., Sidibe, A., Bocoum, A., et al. (2020) Audits de Décès Maternels dans un Hôpital Régional du Mali (Kayes), Place des 3 Retards et Impact sur le Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique. Health Sciences and Disease, 21, 59-63.
[11] Mohammed, M.M., El Gelany, S., Eladwy, A.R., Ali, E.I., Gadelrab, M.T., Ibrahim, E.M., et al. (2020) A Ten Year Analysis of Maternal Deaths in a Tertiary Hospital Using the Three Delays Model. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20, Article No. 585.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Kota, K., Chomienne, M., Geneau, R. and Yaya, S. (2023) Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors Associated with the Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Togo: A Cross-Sectional Study. Reproductive Health, 20, Article No. 109.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Somé, D.T., Sombié, I. and Meda, N. (2013) How Decision for Seeking Maternal Care Is Made—A Qualitative Study in Two Rural Medical Districts of Burkina Faso. Reproductive Health, 10, Article No. 8.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Duysburgh, E., Ye, M., Williams, A., Massawe, S., Sié, A., Williams, J., et al. (2013) Counselling on and Women’s Awareness of Pregnancy Danger Signs in Selected Rural Health Facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 18, 1498-1509.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] David, E., Machungo, F., Zanconato, G., Cavaliere, E., Fiosse, S., Sululu, C., et al. (2014) Maternal near Miss and Maternal Deaths in Mozambique: A Cross-Sectional, Region-Wide Study of 635 Consecutive Cases Assisted in Health Facilities of Maputo Province. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14, Article No. 401.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Muriithi, F.G., Ameh, C.A., Gakuo, R.W., Williams, C.R., Devall, A., Coomarasamy, A., et al. (2025) Variability in the Causes and Delay Factors Contributing to Maternal Mortality: Evidence from Maternal Death Surveillance Reports of 22 African Countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 133, 106-115.[CrossRef]
[17] Franke, M.A. and Iata Pasteur, G. (2026) The Six Delays Model: Expanding the Three Delays Model with Evidence from Madagascar for Maternal Referrals in LMICs. BMJ Global Health, 11, e020936.[CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.