Prevalence and Risk Factors of Baseline Plasmodium Infection before the First Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Round in Burkina Faso: A Cross-Sectional Study ()
1. Introduction
Malaria remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, disproportionately affecting children under five years of age. In 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported an estimated 249 million malaria cases and 608,000 deaths, with more than 94% occurring in Africa [1]. Burkina Faso is among the highest-burden countries, reporting an incidence of approximately 400 cases per 1000 population per year, and malaria continues to be the primary cause of outpatient consultations and childhood mortality [1] [2].
Over the past two decades, Burkina Faso has introduced multiple malaria control strategies to reduce transmission. These include the large-scale deployment of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLITNs), expanded access to rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), and the implementation of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) for children aged 3 - 59 months since 2014 [3] [4]. The latter has demonstrated high protective efficacy, reducing clinical malaria episodes by up to 75% when correctly administered [5]. In addition, malaria vaccination (RTS, S and R21) is now part of the national malaria control tools [6] [7]. Importantly, combining the malaria vaccine with SMC has been shown to yield greater protection than either intervention alone, reducing clinical malaria by 62% and severe malaria by 70% in a West African trial [8].
Despite these advances, Plasmodium infections remain widespread. These silent infections, common among young children in the Sahel, can account for 20% - 40% parasite prevalence at the onset of the rainy season [9]-[12]. Children who carry parasites contribute to the sustainability of malaria transmission and may experience breakthrough infections [13] despite the deployment of preventive measures. When SMC is not effective in clearing parasites, either because of poor adherence or non-compliance, these persistent infections may progress to clinical malaria [14] [15], which, if not promptly treated, can evolve into severe disease with life-threatening consequences [16] [17]. Such residual carriage may ultimately reduce the apparent impact of SMC or vaccination by sustaining the parasite reservoir and enabling progression to illness [16].
Understanding the prevalence and determinants of Plasmodium parasite carriage (Plasmodium infection) prior to SMC campaigns is therefore critical. Baseline parasitemia may be useful for understanding short-term SMC effectiveness, identifying higher-risk groups such as older preschool children, and informing the integration of emerging tools, including malaria vaccines, into national malaria control strategies. In fact, a recent study in Northern Cameroon and southern Senegal reported a high baseline prevalence of RDT-confirmed asymptomatic P. falciparum infections prior to the SMC implementation [18]. In the context of large-scale SMC deployment, the protective impact against clinical malaria was high when coverage was adequate, but real-world constraints may reduce the effectiveness and maintain a reservoir of asymptomatic infections [19].
This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of Plasmodium infection by microscopy among children (6 to 59 months) prior to the first SMC round and to identify demographic and household determinants of Plasmodium infections.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in July 2025, within 0 - 4 days preceding the first Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC) round. The study was carried out in the Nanoro Health District in Burkina Faso, an area of intense seasonal malaria transmission with peaks between July and October. Ten villages from Soaw department located in the Nanoro Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) catchment area were included. This survey was nested within the MalNut Project, a multi-component randomized controlled trial designed to prevent malnutrition and malaria in children aged 6 to 59 months in Burkina Faso by combining SMC with nutritional supplementation (PACTR202507830860741). In the parent trial, eligible children were to be randomly allocated to receive either SMC + Plumpy Doz®, SMC + Nutributter Plus®, or standard intervention (only SMC).
2.2. Study Population and Sampling
Prior to treatment allocation and initiation of the intervention, households were identified from the HDSS database and screened for eligibility. Following the recruitment strategy of the parent trial, households with one eligible child (6 - 59 months) were selected first; if the target sample size for the main trial had not yet been reached, households with two eligible children were subsequently included until the required sample size was attained. During the household visit, all eligible children present in the selected households were assessed. For children presenting with malaria-related symptoms, a blood smear was collected before referral to the nearest health facility for clinical evaluation and appropriate management.
2.3. Data Collection
Data were collected using a structured electronic questionnaire developed in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), administered by trained field workers during household visits. Socio-demographic and household variables, including household head education and occupation, household wealth quintile, and geographical coordinates, were extracted from the HDSS database.
Information on malaria prevention practices (use of insecticide-treated nets, mosquito coil burning, and indoor insecticide spraying), anthropometric measurements (mid-upper arm circumference, weight, height), and axillary temperature were collected during the home visit.
Capillary blood was collected by trained nurses to prepare thick smears and to measure hemoglobin concentration. Microscopy slides were read independently by two certified microscopists, and any discrepancies were resolved by a senior expert reader.
2.4. Variables Definition
Primary outcome
The primary outcome was asymptomatic Plasmodium infection, defined as the detection of asexual parasites by microscopy in the absence of declared malaria-related symptoms. Because all blood smears were collected during household visits, outside of health facilities, and without care-seeking by participants, all microscopy-positive cases identified in the survey were classified as asymptomatic carriers. Secondary outcome was the prevalence of gametocyte carriage.
Exposure variables
The main exposure variables included child age and sex, household wealth quintile, head-of-household occupation, and education. Household wealth quintiles were derived from HDSS socioeconomic data using a routine asset-based household wealth index and classified into five ordered categories, from lowest to highest.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize household and participant characteristics, malaria-prevention practices, and the prevalence of asymptomatic infection with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). To assess factors associated with asymptomatic Plasmodium infection, modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation, implemented through generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to estimate prevalence ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. This approach was selected because the outcome (asymptomatic infection) was relatively common in the study population, and logistic regression would therefore overestimate the risk by yielding odds ratios that diverge from the true risk ratio. The modified Poisson model, as described by Zou (2004), provides direct and interpretable estimates of prevalence ratios, which are more appropriate than odds ratios for cross-sectional studies with binary outcomes. The use of a robust sandwich variance estimator corrects for potential misspecification of the Poisson variance structure, ensuring valid standard errors even when the equidispersion assumption is not met. Because children were clustered within both households and villages, correlation was assessed at both levels. The intravillage correlation was low (ICC = 0.008), whereas the intrahousehold correlation was more substantial (ICC = 0.156). Therefore, the primary analysis accounted for clustering at the household level using a GEE framework with an exchangeable working correlation structure. The model was adjusted with number of prevention practices, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), village, number of households, and household size All analyses were conducted using R version 4.5.1 (2025-06-13 ucrt).
3. Results
3.1. Household Characteristics of Enrolled Children
Most households had one infant (910, 73.7%), followed by two infants (246, 19.9%), three infants (60, 4.9%), four infants (15, 1.2%), and five infants (4, 0.3%), indicating that households with multiple infants were relatively uncommon. Household characteristics (n = 1235) were broadly similar across all age groups. Children lived in large households, with a median of 10 members overall. Wealth distribution was balanced across age categories, with most of the households falling into the middle and upper wealth quintiles. The majority of household heads were engaged in agriculture (77.2%), and formal employment (i.e. Commerce, Crafts, Farming) was rare (2.3%). Educational attainment was low across all groups, with approximately 89.7% of household heads having no formal schooling. Overall, the socioeconomic profile of participating households was relatively homogeneous (Table 1).
Table 1. Household characteristics of enrolled children by age category.
Characteristic |
<1 year |
[1 - 2) years |
[2 - 3) years |
[3 - 4] years |
Overall |
(N = 88) |
(N = 343) |
(N = 398) |
(N = 406) |
(N = 1235) |
Number of households within the compound |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
2.74 (1.83) |
2.92 (2.14) |
3.02 (2.53) |
3.14 (2.34) |
3.01 (2.32) |
Median [Min, Max] |
2.93 [1.00, 11.0] |
2.93 [1.00, 17.0] |
2.00 [1.00, 17.0] |
2.93 [1.00, 17.0] |
2.93 [1.00, 17.0] |
Number of members per household |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
10.8 (5.75) |
9.90 (6.59) |
10.5 (6.94) |
10.7 (6.67) |
10.4 (6.68) |
Median [Min, Max] |
11.5 [1.00, 32.0] |
10.0 [1.00, 65.0] |
10.0 [1.00, 70.0] |
10.0 [1.00, 39.0] |
10.0 [1.00, 70.0] |
Wealth quintile |
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest |
27 (30.7%) |
80 (23.3%) |
64 (16.1%) |
62 (15.3%) |
233 (18.9%) |
Second |
13 (14.8%) |
44 (12.8%) |
57 (14.3%) |
44 (10.8%) |
158 (12.8%) |
Third |
13 (14.8%) |
52 (15.2%) |
74 (18.6%) |
75 (18.5%) |
214 (17.3%) |
Fourth |
18 (20.5%) |
87 (25.4%) |
114 (28.6%) |
125 (30.8%) |
344 (27.9%) |
Highest |
17 (19.3%) |
80 (23.3%) |
89 (22.4%) |
100 (24.6%) |
286 (23.2%) |
Household head occupation |
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture |
69 (78.4%) |
264 (77.0%) |
306 (76.9%) |
315 (77.6%) |
954 (77.2%) |
None/Other |
12 (13.6%) |
44 (12.8%) |
52 (13.1%) |
56 (13.8%) |
164 (13.3%) |
Small-scale work |
6 (6.8%) |
28 (8.2%) |
25 (6.3%) |
30 (7.4%) |
89 (7.2%) |
Formal job |
1 (1.1%) |
7 (2.0%) |
15 (3.8%) |
5 (1.2%) |
28 (2.3%) |
Household head education |
|
|
|
|
|
No education |
67 (76.1%) |
310 (90.4%) |
358 (89.9%) |
373 (91.9%) |
1108 (89.7%) |
Primary |
15 (17.0%) |
16 (4.7%) |
18 (4.5%) |
21 (5.2%) |
70 (5.7%) |
Secondary or higher |
6 (6.8%) |
17 (5.0%) |
22 (5.5%) |
12 (3.0%) |
57 (4.6%) |
3.2. Baseline Demographic and Anthropometric Characteristics
Among 1662 children from 1235 household visited before the SMC campaign, anthropometric indicators such as weight, height, and MUAC increased consistently with age, reflecting expected developmental patterns (Table 2). The overall prevalence of fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5) was low (2.5%), with minimal variation across age groups, suggesting limited symptomatic infection at baseline.
Table 2. Baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics of children by age group.
|
<1 year |
[1 - 2) years |
[2 - 3) years |
[3 - 4] years |
Overall |
(N = 171) |
(N = 510) |
(N = 495) |
(N = 486) |
(N = 1662) |
Age (months) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
0.80 (0.11) |
1.51 (0.27) |
2.49 (0.28) |
3.48 (0.27) |
2.31 (0.96) |
Median [Min, Max] |
0.80 [0.59, 0.99] |
1.51 [1.00, 1.99] |
2.52 [2.00, 2.99] |
3.52 [3.00, 3.99] |
2.29 [0.59, 4.00] |
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
Female |
81 (47.4%) |
254 (49.8%) |
247 (49.9%) |
240 (49.4%) |
822 (49.5%) |
Male |
90 (52.6%) |
256 (50.2%) |
248 (50.1%) |
246 (50.6%) |
840 (50.5%) |
Temperature (˚C) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
36.4 (0.544) |
36.4 (0.583) |
36.3 (0.587) |
36.4 (0.602) |
36.4 (0.586) |
Median [Min, Max] |
36.4 [35.0, 37.8] |
36.4 [35.0, 39.1] |
36.3 [35.0, 39.4] |
36.4 [35.0, 39.2] |
36.3 [35.0, 39.4] |
Fever (Temperature ≥ 37.5˚) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fever |
3 (1.8%) |
15 (2.9%) |
11 (2.2%) |
12 (2.5%) |
41 (2.5%) |
No fever |
168 (98.2%) |
495 (97.1%) |
484 (97.8%) |
474 (97.5%) |
1621 (97.5%) |
Weight (kg) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
8.49 (7.84) |
9.11 (1.45) |
10.8 (1.86) |
12.3 (2.21) |
10.5 (3.37) |
Median [Min, Max] |
7.60 [5.20, 109] |
9.00 [5.30, 16.6] |
10.9 [5.70, 19.0] |
12.5 [6.20, 19.9] |
10.1 [5.20, 109] |
Height (cm) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
69.4 (4.86) |
75.7 (5.65) |
82.5 (6.50) |
89.0 (8.09) |
81.0 (9.25) |
Median [Min, Max] |
69.0 [50.0, 88.0] |
75.0 [60.0, 97.0] |
83.0 [62.0, 102] |
91.0 [64.0, 115] |
80.0 [50.0, 115] |
MUAC (cm) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean (SD) |
13.9 (0.937) |
14.0 (0.938) |
14.4 (0.964) |
14.8 (0.954) |
14.4 (1.02) |
Median [Min, Max] |
13.7 [12.0, 17.0] |
14.0 [10.1, 17.0] |
14.4 [11.0, 18.2] |
15.0 [13.0, 18.2] |
14.2 [10.1, 18.2] |
3.3. Utilization Patterns of Malaria Prevention Tools among Children in Nanoro
Figure 1 shows a strong predominance of insecticide-treated net (ITN) use among children in the study population. ITNs were the most commonly reported malaria prevention tool, with 1367 children using ITNs alone, and 1660 ITN reports overall when combinations with other tools were included. By contrast, the other prevention tools were much less frequently reported, including approximately 285 reports each for coil burning and other tools, 158 for spray use, and 146 for repellent gel cream. This UpSet plot further indicates that the vast majority of children relied on a single prevention method, overwhelmingly ITN use alone, whereas only a small minority reported combinations of multiple tools.
Figure 1. Utilization patterns of malaria prevention tools among children in Nanoro.
3.4. Prevalence of Malaria in the Study Population
The overall prevalence of malaria infection in the study population was 25.5% (95% CI: 23.5% - 27.7%). The prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium infections increased sharply with age. Infants under 1 year had a relatively low prevalence of 12.3% (95% CI: 8.2% - 18.0%), and children aged 1 - 2 years showed a similar level at 12.9% (95% CI: 10.3% - 16.1%). However, infection prevalence rose noticeably in older age groups. Among children aged 2 - 3 years, nearly one-third were infected (32.7%), and the highest prevalence was observed in those aged 3 - 4 years at 36.0% (Table 3).
Table 3. The prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium infections according to the age group.
Age category |
Positive |
Total |
Prevalence (95% CI) |
All population |
424 |
1662 |
25.5% (23.5%, 27.7%) |
<1 year |
21 |
171 |
12.3% (8.2%, 18.0%) |
[1 - 2) years |
66 |
510 |
12.9% (10.3%, 16.1%) |
[2 - 3) years |
162 |
495 |
32.7% (28.7%, 37.0%) |
[3 - 4] years |
175 |
486 |
36.0% (31.9%, 40.4%) |
Figure 2 shows the distribution of log-transformed parasitemia levels across different age classes among children with positive parasitemia. Overall, parasitemia levels were significantly higher in older age groups. Children aged < 1 year and those between 1 - 2 years had lower median parasite densities compared to children aged 2 - 3 years and 3 - 4 years, who showed markedly higher and more variable parasitemia levels. This trend suggests increasing exposure and parasite burden with age.
Figure 2. Distribution of log-transformed parasitemia levels across different age classes among children with positive parasitemia.
It was noticeable that gametocyte carriage was detected in 2.2% of the study population (95% CI: 1.6 - 3.1).
3.5. Factors Associated with Malaria Infection
In adjusted analyses, age was the strongest factor associated with parasite prevalence. Compared with infants < 1 year, children aged 1 - 2 years showed no difference in prevalence (PR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.71 - 1.83), whereas those aged 2 - 3 years (PR = 3.03; 95% CI: 1.98 - 4.63) and 3 - 4 years (PR = 3.43; 95% CI: 2.25 - 5.23) had almost a threefold higher prevalence (Table 4). Male children had higher prevalence than females (PR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.42).
No significant associations were observed for nutritional status (MUAC), household composition (number of households or household size), socioeconomic status (wealth quintile), head-of-household occupation, or education level. Similarly, the number of prevention practices used did not show a measurable association with parasite prevalence.
Table 4. Multivariable modified Poisson regression identifying factors associated with asymptomatic malaria infection.
Characteristic |
N |
n |
PR |
95% CI |
p-value |
Age category |
|
|
|
|
|
<1 year (ref) |
171 |
21 |
1 |
— |
|
[1 - 2) years |
510 |
66 |
1.14 |
0.71, 1.83 |
0.6 |
[2 - 3) years |
495 |
162 |
3.03 |
1.98, 4.63 |
<0.001 |
[3 - 4] years |
486 |
175 |
3.43 |
2.25, 5.23 |
<0.001 |
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
Female |
822 |
190 |
1 |
— |
|
Male |
840 |
234 |
1.21 |
1.03, 1.42 |
0.023 |
Axillary Temperature ≥ 37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
No |
1621 |
408 |
1 |
— |
|
Yes |
41 |
16 |
1.49 |
1.00, 2.24 |
0.052 |
Wealth quintile |
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth (ref) |
468 |
132 |
1 |
— |
|
Highest |
436 |
108 |
0.91 |
0.72, 1.14 |
0.4 |
Lowest |
277 |
70 |
0.98 |
0.76, 1.27 |
0.9 |
Second |
194 |
43 |
0.82 |
0.60, 1.13 |
0.2 |
Third |
287 |
71 |
0.85 |
0.66, 1.11 |
0.2 |
Head of household occupation |
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture (ref) |
1299 |
323 |
1 |
— |
|
Formal job |
34 |
10 |
1.53 |
0.72, 3.24 |
0.3 |
None/Other |
214 |
59 |
1.07 |
0.84, 1.37 |
0.6 |
Small-scale work |
115 |
32 |
1.17 |
0.86, 1.58 |
0.3 |
Head of household education |
|
|
|
|
|
No education (ref) |
1499 |
382 |
1 |
— |
|
Primary |
94 |
26 |
1.17 |
0.83, 1.63 |
0.4 |
Secondary or higher |
69 |
16 |
0.79 |
0.42, 1.49 |
0.5 |
Adjusted with Village, Number of prevention practices, Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), Number of households, and Household size.
4. Discussion
This study shows that the overall prevalence of infections was substantial, and older pre-school children carried a disproportionate burden of asymptomatic parasitemia. Age-related gradients similar to those observed here have been consistently documented across the Sahel region, where parasite carriage typically ranges from 20% to 40% at the start of the rainy season [9]-[12] [20]. Infants exhibited the lowest prevalence, likely reflecting protection from residual maternal antibodies, lower mobility, and closer household head/caregiver protection [21]-[23]. In contrast, increased independence, outdoor activity, and cumulative exposure may explain the sharp increase in infection among children older than two years, consistent with longitudinal studies from several sub-Saharan African countries [20] [24].
The high prevalence of parasitemia observed nearly before the SMC delivery has important operational implications. The protective efficacy of SP–AQ depends on both clearance of existing parasitemia and short-term chemoprophylaxis [19] [25] [26]. A large baseline reservoir may reduce the observable impact of SMC if parasites are not fully cleared due to incomplete adherence, suboptimal dosing, vomiting, or chemoprophylactic failure [25]. Persistent parasitemia at the time of SMC administration has been associated with increased risk of breakthrough malaria during the same transmission season [14]. If untreated, such infections may progress from asymptomatic to clinical malaria, and eventually to severe disease, especially in younger children [14] [15]. These findings highlight the need for improved adherence monitoring, community counselling, and pharmacovigilance during SMC campaigns.
The detection of gametocytes (2.6%) provides further evidence of sustained transmission potential despite preventive measures. Even low-density gametocytemia is sufficient to infect mosquitoes and perpetuate the transmission between SMC cycles [27]. These results support the need to reinforce integrated vector management, particularly ITN durability, replacement campaigns, and complementary strategies addressing outdoor or early-evening biting, which has been increasingly documented in West Africa [28].
Importantly, children older than three years had the highest prevalence and parasite densities, suggesting that this age group represents a particularly important reservoir. Although still eligible for SMC, their increasing exposure and waning maternal immunity may reduce the relative protection provided by chemoprevention alone. Evidence from recent West African trials shows that combining SMC with malaria vaccination (RTS, S/AS01 or R21/Matrix-M) yields additive protection and substantially reduces clinical malaria by more than 60% [6] [8] [29] [30]. Vaccination of this older pre-school group may therefore enhance protection during the high-risk period when exposure intensifies.
No socioeconomic or household-level characteristics were associated with infection risk, likely reflecting the relative socioeconomic homogeneity of rural Nanoro. The lack of association with malaria prevention practices, dominated by reported ITN use, probably reflects behavioral and entomological factors rather than absence of effect [31]. In Burkina Faso, substantial outdoor and early evening vector biting could limit ITN protection, which is largely confined to indoor sleeping hours. As a result, an estimated 10 percent of malaria transmission persists despite high ITN coverage, occurring when human activity overlaps with vector exposure outside net use [31]. In addition, self-reported ITN use often overestimates actual protection by 8 to 13.6 percent, potentially biasing assessments of ITN effectiveness [32] [33]. These findings highlight the persistence of residual transmission and the need for complementary malaria control strategies.
This study has several strengths. HDSS-linked random sampling ensured strong population representativeness, while data collection conducted immediately prior to the SMC implementation enabled an accurate estimation of baseline infection prevalence. The use of GEE-based modified Poisson regression provided valid population-averaged effect estimates and appropriately accounted for within-village clustering. Nevertheless, some limitations should be considered. Microscopy may have underestimated the true prevalence by missing sub-patent infections detectable only by molecular methods such as PCR. The cross-sectional design captures infection status at a single time point, precluding assessment of temporal dynamics or causality. In addition, malaria prevention practices were self-reported and therefore subject to recall and social desirability bias.
Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable insights into the asymptomatic malaria reservoir in a high-burden Sahelian setting and underscores the need to adapt malaria control strategies, particularly for older pre-school children who remain highly exposed despite their eligibility for seasonal malaria chemoprevention.
5. Conclusions
Asymptomatic Plasmodium infections were highly prevalent among children under five in Nanoro immediately before the 2025 SMC cycle, with older pre-school children being the main reservoir of infection and transmission. Age was the main determinant of infection risk, whereas socioeconomic and household characteristics showed no meaningful influence. These findings underscore the need to strengthen malaria control strategies for children aged 2 - 4 years, who experience increasing exposure but remain incompletely protected by SMC alone.
Enhanced community-based surveillance, improved adherence monitoring during SMC, and reinforcement of ITN and vector management strategies are essential to reduce the asymptomatic reservoir. Integrating malaria vaccination with SMC could provide additional protection, particularly for older pre-school children who carry the highest burden of the infection. This baseline assessment will be critical for evaluating the impact of the MalNut intervention and guiding future malaria control strategies in Burkina Faso.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The study was approved by the ethic committee of Burkina Faso (Comité d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé, n˚2024-10-308). Written informed consent was obtained from parents or legal guardians prior to participation.
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current manuscript are not publicly available due to ethical and confidentiality restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to institutional approval and applicable data-sharing regulations.
Funding
This work was conducted within the framework of the MalNut study and was funded by EDESIA. The funder supported the implementation of the study but had no role in the analysis and interpretation of the data or in the writing of the manuscript, unless otherwise stated.
Authors’ Contributions
TR conceived the analysis idea, conducted the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the first version of the manuscript. HT, SO, PS and BK contributed to study design and supervision of field implementation. IB, MKS, WEC WGM and KD contributed to data collection and laboratory procedures. HT, PS and BK contributed to data interpretation and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the children and their parents or legal guardians for participating in this study. We are also grateful to the field workers, microscopists, data management staff, and community leaders in the Nanoro health district for their valuable support during study implementation. We acknowledge the support of the Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro and all members of the MalNut study team for their contribution to the conduct of this work.
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies
The authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI) solely for English language editing and improvement of writing clarity. All scientific content, interpretation, and conclusions were developed and validated by the authors.