Epidemiology of Near Vision Impairment among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older in Northern Togo: Results from a 2024 RAAB Survey ()
1. Introduction
Population ageing represents a major global public health challenge. In 2019, an estimated 703 million people worldwide were aged 65 years and older, a number projected to increase by more than 120% by 2050, with particularly rapid growth in sub-Saharan Africa [1] [2]. Ageing is associated with an increased burden of sensory impairments, especially visual impairment, which significantly affects functional independence and quality of life [3]-[5].
Visual impairment is linked to an increased risk of falls, depression, dependency, and reduced social participation among older adults [4]-[7]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), visual impairment includes deficits in distance or near visual acuity, visual field, or contrast sensitivity [8]. Near vision impairment is operationally defined as near visual acuity worse than N6 at 40 cm [8].
Globally, approximately 2.2 billion people live with near or distance vision impairment, with at least one billion cases being preventable or unaddressed [9]. The burden is disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries, where more than 80% of near vision impairment remains uncorrected [7] [9]. Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys are the standard tool recommended to estimate the prevalence of visual impairment among adults aged 50 years and older [10].
In Togo, the only RAAB survey conducted in 2014 focused on distance vision and did not assess near vision impairment [11]. In the absence of national data on near vision impairment, this study aimed to describe the epidemiology of near vision impairment among adults aged 50 years and older in northern Togo in 2024.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
This was a population-based cross-sectional study using the RAAB methodology, conducted from 18 November to 13 December 2024. The study took place in the Centrale, Kara and Savanes regions, as well as in the prefectures of Akebou and Est Mono, covering approximately 60% of the national territory.
2.2. Study Population
The target population included all men and women aged 50 years and older who had been living in the study area for at least six months. Individuals residing in institutions and temporary visitors were excluded.
2.3. Sampling Procedure
A multistage cluster sampling design was used. Sample size was calculated using RAAB software based on an expected blindness prevalence of 3.6%, a confidence intervals of 95%, a relative precision of 20%, a design effect of 1.5 and a non-response rate of 10%.
A total of 4300 participants were required, distributed across 86 clusters of 50 individuals selected with probability proportional to size using 2022 census data. Compact segment sampling was applied within clusters.
2.4. Data Collection
Five trained RAAB survey teams conducted household visits. The primary outcome was presenting near visual acuity measured at 40 cm with available correction. Near visual acuity was assessed using standard near-vision charts under field conditions following the RAAB7 protocol. Sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex), ownership of near-vision spectacles, and household socioeconomic indicators (food adequacy and income sufficiency) were collected using structured questionnaires.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Data were entered using RAAB7 software developed by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). Data were analyzed using Excel and R software. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Prevalence estimates were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Chi-square test, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
2.6. Ethical Considerations
Confidentiality and anonymity of participants were respected in accordance with ethical principles. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before examination. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Lomé and by the Health Research Bioethics Committee.
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics
Of the 4300 eligible individuals selected, 4290 were examined, yielding a response rate of 99.8%. Women accounted for 63.8% of the sample. The mean age was 63.1 ± 10.4 years, with participants aged 50 - 59 years constituted the largest age group (42.0%) (Table 1).
3.2. Prevalence of Near Vision Impairment
The overall prevalence of near vision impairment was 81.9% (95% CI: 80.7 - 83.0). Prevalence was significantly higher among women than men (86.1% vs 74.6%; p < 0.001) (Table 2).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of participants aged 50 years and older.
Variable |
n |
% |
Sex |
|
|
Female |
2738 |
63.8 |
Male |
1552 |
36.2 |
Age group (years) |
|
|
50 - 59 |
1801 |
42.0 |
60 - 69 |
1330 |
31.0 |
70 - 79 |
752 |
17.5 |
≥ 80 |
407 |
9.5 |
Total |
4290 |
100 |
Table 2. Prevalence of near vision impairment by sex.
|
n |
n with NVI |
Prevalence (%) |
Female |
2738 |
2357 |
86.1 |
Male |
1552 |
1158 |
74.6 |
Total |
4290 |
3515 |
81.9 |
NVI = Near Vision Impairment.
3.3. Access to Near-Vision Correction
Among the 4290 participants, 18.3% (n = 784) owned near-vision spectacles. A total of 3506 participants did not have near-vision spectacles at the time of the survey, including 3474 who reported having never worn near-vision spectacles in their lifetime and 32 who reported having worn them at least once. Among participants who had never worn near-vision spectacles (n = 3474), the main reasons for non-use were lack of perceived need (63.1%), financial constraints (20.9%), and unavailability of spectacles (16.0%) (Table 3).
Socioeconomic Status of Participants with Near Vision Impairment
Among participants with near vision impairment, 78.1% reported that household food supply was just adequate and 19.8% reported inadequate food supply. Regarding household income, 57.4% reported insufficient income, while only 3.1% reported sufficient income with the ability to save (Table 4).
Table 3. Access to near-vision correction and reasons for non-use. Participants aged ≥ 50 years (n = 4290).
Variable |
n |
% |
Ownership of near-vision spectacles |
|
|
Own near-vision spectacles |
784 |
18.3 |
Do not own near-vision spectacles |
3506 |
81.7 |
Among participants without spectacles (n = 3506) |
|
|
Never used near-vision spectacles |
3474 |
99.1 |
Used near-vision spectacles at least once |
32 |
0.9 |
Reasons for non-use among never-users (n = 3474) |
|
|
No perceived need |
2193 |
63.1 |
Not affordable |
727 |
20.9 |
Not available |
554 |
16.0 |
Reasons for non-use among prior users (n = 32) |
|
|
Lost/broken |
16 |
50.0 |
Not available |
9 |
28.1 |
No perceived need |
7 |
21.9 |
Table 4. Household socioeconomic status among participants with near vision impairment.
Household status |
n |
% |
Food more than adequate |
74 |
2.1 |
Food just adequate |
2747 |
78.1 |
Food less than adequate |
694 |
19.8 |
4. Discussion
This study demonstrates an extremely high prevalence of near vision impairment (NVI) among adults aged 50 years and older in northern Togo. The observed prevalence (81.9%) is higher than that reported in several studies conducted in Asia and other African settings. In India, Marmamula et al. reported a prevalence of near vision impairment of 58.3% among adults aged 40 years and older, with more than half of affected individuals owning near-vision spectacles [12]. These differences likely reflect better access to eye care services, improved availability of affordable spectacles, and greater awareness of presbyopia in those settings.
The higher prevalence of near vision impairment among women observed in this study is consistent with findings from previous studies, which have shown that women are disproportionately affected by visual impairment [13]. This disparity may be explained by longer life expectancy among women, as well as greater socioeconomic and cultural barriers limiting access to eye care services.
Access to near-vision correction was extremely limited in the present study, despite the simplicity and low cost of presbyopia correction. Similar barriers have been described in other low-income settings, where lack of perceived need, financial constraints, and limited availability of spectacles are the main reasons for non-use [12] [14]. These findings underscore the persistent inequities in access to basic eye care services in low- and middle-income countries. Studies evaluating awareness and perception of presbyopia have also shown that many adults do not recognize presbyopia as a treatable condition, which contributes to the low uptake of near-vision correction [15]. Population-based epidemiological analyses further confirm that uncorrected presbyopia remains highly prevalent, particularly in low-resource settings where access to refractive services is limited [16].
At the global level, recent analyses of effective refractive error coverage have demonstrated substantial inequalities in access to refractive services, with near-vision correction coverage remaining significantly lower in low-income regions compared with high-income countries [17]. Comparable findings have been reported in several population-based studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Surveys assessing near vision impairment and presbyopia have consistently shown high prevalence and very low spectacle coverage across the region. These studies highlight that uncorrected presbyopia remains one of the most common causes of functional visual impairment in African populations, particularly among older adults and rural communities [18].
The strong association between near vision impairment and household socioeconomic vulnerability observed in this study highlights the role of poverty as a key determinant of uncorrected visual impairment. Previous studies have consistently shown that low income and food insecurity are major barriers to accessing eye care services in sub-Saharan Africa [19] [20]. Addressing near vision impairment, therefore, requires not only clinical interventions but also policies aimed at improving financial protection and accessibility within primary health care systems.
In line with the World Health Organization’s World Report on Vision, the findings of this study support the integration of near-vision services into primary eye care and the scaling up of affordable spectacle provision as part of universal health coverage efforts [9] [10].
The cross-sectional design limits causal inference. In addition, socioeconomic data were self-reported. However, the standardized RAAB methodology ensures good representativeness and comparability of results.
5. Conclusion
Near vision impairment affects more than four out of five adults aged 50 years and older in northern Togo. The high burden, combined with limited access to near-vision correction and widespread socioeconomic vulnerability, underscores the urgent need to strengthen integrated and affordable eye care services.
Author’s Contributions
All authors participated in drafting and revising the manuscript and approved the final version.
Funding
The survey was conducted under the supervision of the National Eye Health Program and funded by the German Cooperation (BMZ) and Christian Blind Mission (CBM).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the National Eye Health Program, field teams, and participating communities.