Hydrogeochemical Assessment and Groundwater Quality in Zebediela Sub-Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa

Abstract

Groundwater remains a critical resource for rural communities in South Africa, yet its quality is questionable due to geogenic processes and anthropogenic activities. This research evaluated groundwater quality through hydrochemical and microbial analysis of 20 borehole samples used domestically in the rural area of Zebediela subregion, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Parameters analysed included major ions, trace metals and faecal indicator bacteria, with data interpreted using multivariate analyses including co-occurrence matrices, Pearson correlation heatmaps and Principal Component Analysis. Nitrate, sulphate, phosphate, chloride and fluoride were within permissible limits, but COD and BOD were slightly above recommended levels, indicating moderate ion concentrations. Microbial contamination was detected in 80% of the samples (including Heterotrophic, Escherichia coli, coliform, Salmonella species, Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci), with Heterotrophic bacteria present in most samples, indicating emerging contamination. PCA identified mineral dissolution, evaporative concentration, organic pollution and redox-mediated metal mobilization as the dominant processes shaping groundwater chemistry in Zebediela subregion. Therefore, regular monitoring, improved sanitation infrastructure and protection of borehole surroundings are recommended to manage water security in the Zebediela sub-region.

Share and Cite:

Sambo, T.D., Gololo, S.S., Mapfumari, N.S., Mabe, C.J. and Seeletse, S.M. (2026) Hydrogeochemical Assessment and Groundwater Quality in Zebediela Sub-Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 18, 208-224. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2026.183012.

1. Introduction

Access to safe, reliable drinking water is a major problem in Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in rural and peri-urban regions [1]. A large population relies on untreated water sources from rivers, wells and boreholes, which are susceptible to contamination by organic matter, animal waste and surface pollutants. Waterborne diseases like cholera and typhoid fever, remain prevalent in some of these regions [2] [3]. This problem is worsened by aging infrastructure, leaking pipes, poor maintenance, delayed upgrades and mismanaged public funds, which disproportionately affect rural areas and increase reliance on groundwater [4].

Water drilling predates millennia and continues to provide a reliable, independent and inexpensive water source [5]. Although combination of natural and anthropogenic factors make up the quality of groundwater as well as natural processes like rock weathering, mineral dissolution, cation exchange and redox reactions. Additionally, soil properties, including mineral composition, permeability and organic matter content control the mobility of ions and trace metals [6] [7]. Anthropogenic activities such as agriculture, wastewater discharge, pit latrines, septic tanks and livestock farming introduce contaminants that can percolate into aquifers and compromise groundwater quality [8] [9].

Previous studies in Limpopo Province reported wide variation in physicochemical parameters like pH, salinity, electrical conductivity, total dissolved and microbial loads between boreholes, influenced by local geology, climate and land-use [10]. However, groundwater quality in many subregions, including Zebediela, remains poorly characterized, so communities often consume groundwater without knowing its safety or compliance with WHO and SANS drinking water [11]. The Zebediela subregion relies extensively on groundwater for domestic, agricultural and recreational use. The combination of semi-arid climatic conditions, diverse soil types, sedimentary geology and intensive agricultural activities creates complex hydrochemical interactions that influence groundwater quality [12] [13]. This study aimed to evaluate the hydrochemical composition, microbial contamination and heavy metal concentrations in borehole water from Zebediela subregion.

2. Study Area

2.1. Description of the Study Area

The study was conducted in Zebediela subregion (24.310˚S, 29.270˚E), located within the Capricorn District Municipality of Limpopo Province, South Africa. The area forms part of the Lowveld within the greater Limpopo River Basin and lies at an elevation of approximately 546 m above sea level [14]. It has a semi-arid and humid subtropical climate, predominantly covered by the savanna grassland biome. The mean summer temperature is around 33˚C, and the mean winter temperature is 14˚C. Rainfall distribution is greatly influenced by the Soutpansberg Mountain. The catchment average annual precipitation is about 750 mm between November and March, and often varies between 340 mm and 2000 mm.

The area is underlined by sedimentary rocks which are good aquifers for underground water. The population is approximately 284,000 as per the 2022 census report and the local economy is primarily rural, characterised by cattle ranching and the cultivation of citrus. The soil composition is a mixture of red, structureless, freely-drained sandy clay loam solids from the Hutton form and the Olifants River catchment [15]. Borehole water is mainly used for domestic, recreational and agricultural purposes.

2.2. Sample Collection

Twenty water samples were randomly collected from independent household boreholes in Zebediela subregion. Sampling was carried out in March 2025, during the peak dry season. Prior to collection, 500 mL polyethylene bottle containers were soaked in 70% ethanol and thoroughly rinsed with distilled water until they were free of the solvent. The tap was allowed to run freely for one minute, and the bottles were rinsed with borehole water prior to filling them. Samples were transported to the laboratory in an ice-filled cooler box for analysis.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Laboratory Analysis of Physicochemical Parameters

Total hardness was determined by complexometric titration using 0.01 M EDTA and Eriochrome Black T as the indicator; results were expressed in mg·L1 as CaCO3. Chloride was analyzed using Mohr’s argentometric titration method with 0.0141 N AgNO3 and potassium chromate as the indicator.

3.2. Nutrient and Anion Determination

Nitrate concentrations were measured using a Shimadzu UV—1900 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Nitrate absorbance was read at 220 nm and corrected for organic matter interference at 275 nm. Sulphate was analyzed using the turbidimetric barium chloride method, with absorbance recorded at 420 nm. Phosphate was determined using the ascorbic acid (molybdenum blue) method at 880 nm. Fluoride concentrations were measured using the SPANDS spectrophotometric method at 570 nm. All nutrient analyses were validated using calibrated curves, reagent blanks, triplicate determinations and recovery rates within 95% - 105%.

3.3. Organic Pollution Indicator

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) was measured for borehole water samples over a period of five days (BOD5), using the Winkler iodometric titration method following the APHA standard procedure. Initial Dissolved Oxygen (DO) was measured immediately after collection, then samples were incubated for five days at a temperature of 20˚C ± 1˚C in the dark. Following incubation, the final DO was measured and BOD5 was calculated as the difference between the initial and final DO (DO0 - DO5). All measurements were performed in triplicate for each site to ensure precision and reproducibility.

3.4. Trace and Heavy Metal Analysis

Trace and heavy metals (Fe, Mg, As, Cd, Zn and Pb) were quantified using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Prior to analysis, samples were digested according to APHA method 3030 E using a 3:1 (v/v) mixture of concentrated nitric acid (HNO3) and hydrogen peroxide (H202). Digestion was performed on a hotplate at 95˚C until the sample volume was reduced to approximately 20 mL. The digestates were filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane, diluted to 50 mL with deionised water and stored at 4˚C prior to analysis. Instrument calibration was performed using certified multi-element standard solution traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Quality control included the analysis of reagent blanks, duplicate samples and certified reference material for trace metals in water (NIST SRM 1643f).

3.5. Microbiological Analyses of Water Samples

Water samples were analysed for the presence of bacterial indicators for faecal contamination using Shimadzu CompactDry plates. Approximately 1 mL of filtered (0.45 μm paper filters) water samples were carefully pipetted on the CompactDry surface and allowed to diffuse evenly, followed by incubation in accordance with Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of the incubation conditions, duration of incubation and colony morphology characteristics of microbial species.

Bacterial Type

Incubation Temperature

Incubation Time

Colony Colour

Heterotrophic (AQ)

36˚C ± 2˚C

44 ± 4 hours

Red

Escherichia coli (ECO)

37˚C ± 1˚C

24 ± 2 hours

Blue/Blue purple

Coliform (CF)

37˚C ± 1˚C

24 ± 2 hours

Blue/Blue green

Enterobacteriaceae (ETB)

37˚C ± 1˚C

24 ± 2 hours

Red/Red purple

Enterococci (ETC)

37˚C ± 1˚C

22 ± 2 hours

Light blue/Blue

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA)

36˚C ± 1˚C

24 ± 48 hours

Red + Greenish yellow

Salmonella species (SL)

41˚C ± 43˚C

20 ± 24 hours

Yellow/Black/Green

Bacillus cereus (BC)

30˚C ± 1˚C

24 ± 2 hours

Green/Blue

Staphylococcus aureus (X-SA)

37˚C ± 1˚C

24 + 2 hours

Light blue/Blue

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Mean values were calculated to evaluate parameter variability and multivariate analyses including co-occurrence matrices, Pearson correlation heatmaps and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were utilized to identify contamination patterns, geochemical processes and relationship between parameters.

4. Results

4.1. Major Ion Chemistry

Table 2 and Figure 1(a) show the composition of the major ions in the water samples. The groundwater from the study area showed hardness varied from 44 - 123 mg·L1 and a mean value of 73.90 mg·L1. None of samples exceed the WHO permissible limit of 500 mg·L1. Mg varied from 0.2 - 35.9 mg·L1 with an average value of 7.64 mg·L1; all samples complied with WHO guideline of 50 mg·L1. Cl⁻ concentration ranged between 103 - 390 mg·L−1 with an average of 201.85 mg·L−1 below the WHO limit (300 mg·L−1), even though 15% of the samples were above the WHO permissible limit. NO 3 concentrations varied between 3 - 13.25 mg·L−1, with a mean value of 8.52 mg·L−1 below WHO recommendation of 11 mg·L−1, despite 9 (45%) samples above the permissible limit. PO 4 3 levels ranged from 0.01 to 0.61 mg·L−1, with an average of 0.63 mg·L−1. A total of 4 samples (20%) exceeded the WHO threshold limit of 1 mg·L−1. SO 4 2 levels ranged between 100 to 633 mg·L−1 with a mean value of 278.1 mg·L−1. None of the samples deviated from the WHO (250) guideline. F concentration ranged from 0.01 to 0.65 mg·L−1, with a mean of 0.21 mg·L−1. All samples were below the WHO recommended limit (1.5 mg·L−1). BOD and COD were below threshold, ranging from 0.73 to 6.01 mg·L−1 and 0.4 to 7.21 mg·L−1, with averages of 2.9 and 2.54 mg·L1, respectively.

Table 2. Showing the results of the concentration of ions in groundwater from Zebediela subregion.

S/ID

Hardness

Mg

Cl⁻

NO 3

SO 4 2

PO 4 3

F⁻

COD

BOD

WHO Limit mg·L1 [16]

≤500

≤50

≤300

≤11

≤250

≤2.2

≤1.5

≤5

≤5

BH1

44

6.01

111

9.02

101

0.01

0.65

2.01

1.71

BH2

123

6.1

110

4.64

250

1.2

0.5

1.2

3.03

BH3

65

9.3

230

11.9

233

0.7

0.64

6.07

5.02

BH4

70

6.67

103

10.2

300

0.5

0.49

5.95

3.01

BH5

44

6.45

215

12.95

633

0.12

0.05

0.72

0.87

BH6

123

6.51

160

6.02

111

0.18

0.02

1.08

1.02

BH7

65

6.21

290

11.02

356

0.41

0.03

4.01

3.03

BH8

70

6.76

330

9.9

390

0.4

0.32

3.4

6.01

BH9

44

6.35

201

10.05

401

0.6

0.08

4.7

1.01

BH10

123

8.43

390

4.02

281

1.5

0.02

1.11

2.02

BH11

65

35.9

290

11.22

112

0.51

0.05

1.21

2.01

BH12

70

6.24

109

6.14

100

1.25

0.03

7.21

4.03

BH13

65

15.1

200

7.60

223

0.4

0.02

1.23

6.02

BH14

70

0.99

100

3.22

302

0.5

0.01

7.9

4.01

BH15

44

1.02

215

13.25

505

0.55

0.23

3.02

4.21

BH16

123

0.2

160

5.02

170

0.45

0.02

0.98

2.02

BH17

65

0.2

250

11.82

344

0.5

0.03

2.01

0.73

BH18

70

12.5

108

8.10

100

0.4

0.1

0.4

1.28

BH19

65

11.7

360

4.65

529

0.9

0.53

1.8

1.01

BH20

70

0.2

105

10.02

121

1.61

0.43

2.1

1.32

(a)

(b)

Figure 1. Major ion and trace metal average concentrations against WHO standard threshold.

4.2. Trace and Heavy Metals

The concentration of selected metals (Table 3 and Figure 1(b)) in the underground followed the order Fe > Zn > Cd > As > Pb. Fe ranged between 0.02 - 0.24 mg·L1, an average of 0.12 mg·L1 lower than the WHO aesthetic limit of 0.3 mg·L1. Zn varied from 0.02 - 0.09 mg·L1, with a mean value of 0.05 mg·L1 well below WHO recommended threshold of 3.0. Cd ranged from non-detectable to 0.05 mg·L1, with an average concentration of 0.018 mg·L1. A total of 10 samples (50%) exceeded the WHO-recommended limit of 0.003 mg·L1. Pb varied from non-detectable to 0.019 mg·L1 with a mean of 0.006 mg·L1. In spite of 3 samples (15%) exceeding the WHO permissible limits (0.01 mg·L1). As levels ranged from non-detectable to 0.05 mg·L1 with a mean of 0.01 mg·L1. 35% (7) of the samples deviated from the WHO threshold (0.01 mg·L1), indicating potential contamination.

Table 3. Showing the results of the concentration of heavy metals in groundwater from Zebediela subregion.

S/ID

Pb

Fe

Cd

Zn

As

WHO Limit mg·L1 [16]

≤0.01

≤0.3

≤0.003

≤5.0

≤0.01

BH1

0.001

0.03

0.03

0.1

Undetected

BH2

0.001

0.081

Undetected

0.03

0.01

BH3

0.011

0.09

Undetected

0.02

Undetected

BH4

0.005

0.13

Undetected

0.05

0.05

BH5

0.006

0.11

0.001

0.07

0.01

BH6

0.001

0.16

0.03

0.05

0.04

BH7

0.005

0.14

0.03

0.09

Undetected

BH8

0.007

0.08

0.05

0.02

0.002

BH9

0.005

0.23

Undetected

0.04

Undetected

BH10

0.007

0.08

0.03

0.04

0.002

BH11

0.006

0.16

0.03

0.03

0.002

BH12

0.019

0.24

Undetected

0.05

Undetected

BH13

0.007

0.09

Undetected

0.05

Undetected

BH14

Undetected

0.07

Undetected

0.03

0.03

BH15

0.003

0.12

0.03

0.03

0.05

BH16

0.006

0.12

0.04

0.05

0.04

BH17

0.011

0.112

0.03

0.02

Undetected

BH18

0.009

0.11

Undetected

0.04

Undetected

BH19

0.005

0.02

0.002

0.05

Undetected

BH20

0.001

0.131

0.03

0.08

0.001

4.3. Microbial Assessment

The qualitative results of the microbial assessment are given in Table 4. The most common contaminants detected were Heterotrophic bacteria, Escherichia coli and general coliforms, with Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci being slightly less common, which suggests that water is contaminated with faecal matter. Approximately 80% (Figure 1(a)) of Heterotopic bacteria were detected in 14 (Figure 1(b)) samples; E. coli and other coliforms were detected in 30% of the samples. Salmonella spp. were detected in 20% of the samples and Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillus and Staphylococcus aureus were detected sporadically in approximately 15% of the samples (Figure 1(a)); Enterococci were detected at the lowest frequency and no Pseudomonas aeruginosa were detected in all samples.

Table 4. Quantitative analysis of bacteria based on the plate method.

S/ID

Di

AQ

EC

ETB

ETC

PA

SL

BC

X-SA

BH1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH2

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH3

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH4

-

+

-

-

+

-

+

-

-

BH5

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH6

-

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

+

BH7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH8

-

+

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

BH9

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH10

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH11

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH12

-

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

-

BH13

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH14

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH15

-

+

+

+

-

-

+

+

-

BH16

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH17

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH18

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH19

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

BH20

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

Distilled water (Di); Minus sign (-); – Absent; Plus sign (+); + Present.

4.4. Correlation Coefficients

Pearson’s correlation heatmap was generated to determine the relationships among the selected water quality parameters. A strong negative correlation was seen between Hardness and NO 3 (r = −0.67). A moderate positive correlation was found between Cl and Cd (r = 0.47). Cl and SO 4 2 also showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.47). Expectedly, BOD and COD were positively correlated (r = 0.45). Pb and Fe showed a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.40). Pb and As (r = −0.37) and Mg and As (r = −0.33), exhibited negative correlations. A moderate negative correlation was found between F- and Fe (r = −0.49). Similarly, a negative correlation was identified between COD and Cd (r = −0.41).

5. Discussion

Water quality assessment is imperative for public health and sustainable freshwater resources. Regular monitoring improves understanding of hydrochemical systems and supports resource management practices. This study investigated the chemical quality, heavy metal levels and microbial status of underground water collected from Zebediela subregion. The samples showed soft to moderately hard water (Figure 1(a)), like that reported by [17] in Ga-Matlala village in Limpopo, attributed to dissolution of calcium-magnesium carbonates and bicarbonates. Although not acutely toxic at this level, increased detergent and soap use can indirectly damage household infrastructure from chemical accumulation [18].

Sulphate evinced a greater spatial variation than hardness, most likely due to the dissolution of evaporite minerals or to lithological control rather than surface contamination. This contrasts with surface contamination, which typically manifests in primary aesthetic effects. Comparable sulphate enrichment has been reported in borehole water systems in the Vhembe district of Limpopo Province [19]. Adverse health effects related to exposure to sulphate at such low concentrations are generally confined to taste alteration and laxation effects in non-acclimated consumers [20]. Cumulative exposure to undesirable concentrations (above the recommended 1.5 mg·L by WHO) of F is concerning. Exposure to excessive F can lead to disturbances of bone homeostasis and enamel development [21]. The most likely cause of F enrichment is the geochemical weathering of fluoride-bearing minerals. This is further enhanced by low rainfall, high evaporation rates and elevated pH in Zebediela. The concurrent enrichment of F alongside elevated SO 4 2 concentrations and increased water hardness observed in several boreholes in Zebediela subregion may suggest prolonged water-rock interactions [22].

Elevated NO 3 concentrations in regions characterized by intensive cropping are indicative of fertilizer-derived nitrate inputs. Accordingly, the occurrence of increased nitrate levels in Zebediela is plausible, given its designation as an area of high agricultural productivity. Similarly, comparable NO 3 distributions in agriculturally impacted groundwater from Albert, Canada [23]. Chronic exposure to NO 3 is associated with Methaemoglobinemia in infants and the in vivo conversion of NO 3 to N-nitroso compounds has been associated with multiple systemic health effects, particularly through their mutagenic and carcinogenic potential [24]. Additionally, the presence of both nitrate and microbial contamination in some of the boreholes may lead to a greater incidence of gastrointestinal infections, due to microorganisms ability to facilitate the conversion of nitrate into nitrite [25] (Figure 2).

Moderate COD and BOD levels observed in Zebediela subregion groundwater (Figure 1(a)) suggested the presence of organic contaminants, potentially associated with surface activities and borehole exhibiting limited attenuation due to short subsurface travel. Although the COD and BOD measured in this study did not indicate severe organic pollution, they are indicative of sustained input of organic matter into the groundwater system [26]. Under such environmental conditions, the co-existence of a small amount of readily-biodegradable organic matter provides sufficient substrate to maintain viable population levels of heterotrophic bacteria and the potential proliferation of pathogenic organisms. This risk is particularly pronounced in rural borehole systems, where disinfection practices are either sporadic [27] or do not exist.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2. (a) Flow diagram showing the distribution and development of specific microorganisms in positive samples. Numbers indicate the count of samples positive for each microbial group or combination. (b) Bar chart showing the percentage occurrence of key microbial indicators and pathogens.

Heavy metals constitute one of the most widespread groups of groundwater contaminants, with their presence reflecting a combination of geogenic contributions and anthropogenic inputs. In the Zebediela subregion, intensive citrus cultivation, extensive limestone mining and unregulated waste disposal practices represent potential sources of metal contamination. Over time, these activities have enhanced chemical loading in the subsurface environment and facilitated the infiltration of landfill derived leachates into local aquifers [28]. The hydrogeochemical quality system of the groundwater system (Table 2) was influenced by the metal speciation, transport and bioavailability, as suggested by the multivariate statistical analyses (Figure 3). Increased bicarbonate and sulphate concentrations enhance the mobility of metals such as lead and cadmium through the formation of carbonate and sulphato-complexes, respectively, while increased chloride levels promote metal solubility via the formation of thermodynamically stable chloro-complexes [29].

Figure 3. Present images depicting selected results from microbial detection in borehole water and colony development after incubation.

These associations are consistent with the observed correlations between major ions and trace metals and the PCA loadings (Figure 4), which suggest shared geochemical drivers and potential common sources. In addition, variations in pH also play a fundamental role in regulating metal behaviour, as acidic conditions can induce the desorption of metals from the solids phase of the aquifer and destabilize metal carbonate complexes, resulting in increased dissolved metals [30].

Elevated levels of iron and manganese have been recorded in a number of boreholes over an extended period of time (Figure 1(b)), which demonstrate the occurrence of redox conditions within different sections of the aquifer system. The reductive dissolution of iron and manganese oxides under these redox conditions results in the release of dissolved ferrous ion (F2+) and dissolved manganous ion (Mn2+) into groundwater while also causing the mobilization of trace metals adsorbed to aquifer solids including Pb, Cd and As [31]. Elevated Mg and Fe are associated with other trace metals which suggests that redox-driven mobilization of trace metals is likely occurring at the sites of contamination, as opposed to independent or separate contamination events. Arsenic is one example where its mobility is directly related to the dissolution of iron oxyhydroxides [32].

Figure 4. Correlation matrix of organic water quality parameters. The heatmap shows Pearson correlation coefficient (r) from −1 (dark blue, strong negative) to +1 (dark red, strong positive), with significant relationships (r ≥ 0.5) highlighted.

The detection of faecal indicator bacteria such as Escherichia coli and enteric bacteria (Table 4) confirms faecal contamination of the groundwater system. Such contamination can probably be attributed to inadequately sited pit latrines, the concentration of shallow borehole and enhanced surface infiltration which make aquifers prone to microbial ingress [33]. Similar microbial contamination profiles of both total coliform and E. coli were detected in domestic borehole water from Vhembe District, Limpopo Province. The co-occurring patterns found in the microbiota (Figure 1(a), Figure 1(b)) imply shared contamination pathways rather than isolated events and a common source or transport mechanism consistent with network-based microbial ecology models [34]. When considered alongside elevated COD, BOD and nitrate levels, these indicate a sustained surface-derived contamination and limited natural attenuation within the aquifer system. These conditions are an important public health issue, as faecal contamination of drinking water is strongly associated with increased risks of waterborne disease, including gastroenteritis, dysentery, cholera and typhoid fever [35] [36].

The results of the correlation analyses indicated a combination of weak, moderate and strong correlations among the major ions and physicochemical parameters in addition to indicating influence on the quality of groundwater by multiple controlling processes. The inverse association NO 3 with SO 4 2 (Table 2) also suggests that nitrate and sulphate enrichment may be occurring through processes other than the dissolution of carbonates (i.e., agricultural inputs or anthropogenic influences). These ions appear to be derived from either evaporative concentration of groundwater or anthropogenic contamination because of the presence of Cl and SO 4 2 (r = 0.47). moderate correlations were observed for Pb with both Fe (r = 0.40) and COD (r = 0.24); these correlations could indicate the occurrence of adsorption/desorption processes or co-mobility of Pb and Fe under similar geochemical conditions. Pb exhibits moderate correlations with both Fe r = 0.40 and COD r = 0.24, which could indicate the occurrence of adsorption/desorption processes or co-mobility of Pb and Fe under similar geochemical conditions.

Figure 5. The plot shows variable loadings (vectors) for the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2), which explain 32.7% of the dataset variance. The length and direction of each vector indicate the strength and correlation of each parameter with the components.

As shown in Figure 5, PCA indicates that PC1 and PC2 explained 16.6% and 16.1% of the total variance, respectively, accounting for a cumulative variance of 32.7%. Although this cumulative variance is relatively low, such variance distribution is typical of complex hydrogeochemical systems influenced by multiple natural and anthropogenic processes, where no single factor dominates groundwater chemistry [37] [38]. PC1 was primarily loaded with organic pollution and metal-related parameters including Pb, BOD, COD and Fe suggesting a possible pollution gradient exists due to local contamination sources, like agricultural runoff or domestic waste disposal. Conversely, variables that loaded negatively on PC1, such as hardness and As, suggest that these variables are largely controlled by geogenic processes (i.e., mineral weathering) rather than anthropogenic activities. PC2 showed strong loading for nutrients and major ions ( NO 3 , SO 4 2 , Cl and Mg), suggesting geochemical and fertilizer applications and/or evaporative concentration effects. Additional variance was distributed across higher-order components, indicating the contribution of localized or site-specific hydrogeochemical controls.

6. Conclusion

In the present study, the quality of borehole water composition from Zebediela subregion, was utilized for the presence of major ions, trace metals and biological content compared to the drinking water standards. It is concluded that none of the major ions exceeded the permissible limits by WHO except for heavy metals Cd and As which were found fairly above for domestic use. Biological analysis revealed faecal indicator in 80% of the samples, demonstrating the ability of microorganism growth in groundwater due to external influence. Although groundwater in Zebediela subregion is essential for domestic, agricultural, and recreational use, microbial contamination and localized exceedances of some parameters mean it is not consistently safe for direct consumption. Regular monitoring, improved sanitation, borehole protection, and community education on safe water handling are needed to safeguard public health. The findings provide a critical baseline for sustainable groundwater quality management in Zebediela subregion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Baddianaah, I., Dongzagla, A. and Salifu, S.N. (2024) Navigating Access to Safe Water by Rural Households in Sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from North-Western Ghana. Sustainable Environment, 10, Article ID: 2303803.[CrossRef]
[2] Ejiohuo, O., Onyeaka, H., Akinsemolu, A., Nwabor, O.F., Siyanbola, K.F., Tamasiga, P., et al. (2025) Ensuring Water Purity: Mitigating Environmental Risks and Safeguarding Human Health. Water Biology and Security, 4, Article ID: 100341.[CrossRef]
[3] Tenebe, I.T., Babatunde, E.O., Ogarekpe, N.M., Emakhu, J., Etu, E., Edo, O.C., et al. (2024) Detection and Measurement of Bacterial Contaminants in Stored River Water Consumed in Ekpoma. Water, 16, Article No. 2696.[CrossRef]
[4] Tshona, S.S., Lungisa, S. and Mgweba, L. (2025) Thirsting for Solutions: Unpacking Inadequate Water Provision in Rural Communities. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 13, a873.[CrossRef]
[5] Voudouris, K., Valipour, M., Kaiafa, A., Zheng, X.Y., Kumar, R., Zanier, K., et al. (2018) Evolution of Water Wells Focusing on Balkan and Asian Civilizations. Water Supply, 19, 347-364.[CrossRef]
[6] Promilton, A.A.A., Ravindran, A.A., Pitchaimani, V.S., Kingston, J.V. and Karuppannan, S. (2025) Comprehensive Hydrogeochemical Characterization and Seasonal Water Quality Index Analysis for Sustainable Groundwater Management in Valliyur Region, Southern Tamil Nadu, India. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 33251.[CrossRef]
[7] Akhtar, N., Syakir Ishak, M.I., Bhawani, S.A. and Umar, K. (2021) Various Natural and Anthropogenic Factors Responsible for Water Quality Degradation: A Review. Water, 13, Article No. 2660.[CrossRef]
[8] Ravi, M., et al. (2025) Hydrogeochemical Evaluation and Groundwater Quality Assessment in Madurai South Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Environmental Studies, 39, 25-44.[CrossRef]
[9] Egbueri, J.C., Agbasi, J.C., Ayejoto, D.A., Khan, M.I. and Khan, M.Y.A. (2023) Extent of Anthropogenic Influence on Groundwater Quality and Human Health-Related Risks: An Integrated Assessment Based on Selected Physicochemical Characteristics. Geocarto International, 38, Article ID:2210100.[CrossRef]
[10] Shokoohi, E. and Moyo, N. (2025) Groundwater Quality in a Rural and Urbanized Region in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Environments, 12, Article No. 174.[CrossRef]
[11] Ndlangamandla, L., Sukdeo, N. and Mukwakungu, S.C. (2024) Water Quality Improvement for Food and Beverage Industry vs. SANS:241. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Tokyo, 10-12 September 2024, 1028-1041.[CrossRef]
[12] Florez-Peñaloza, J.R., Mahlknecht, J., Escolero, O., Morales-Casique, E., Montaño-Caro, J.C., Blanco-Gaona, S., et al. (2025) Hydrogeochemical Evolution of a Semiarid Endorheic Basin, with Intense Agricultural and Livestock Activities. Journal of Hydrology, 657, Article ID:133093.[CrossRef]
[13] Hamma, B., Bekkouche, M.F., Bouaicha, F., Elnagdy, K.A., Alzaed, A., Barkat, A., et al. (2025) Hydrogeochemical Assessment of Groundwater for Agricultural Suitability in the Ksour Mountains, Algeria. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 36441.[CrossRef]
[14] Sambo, T.D., Gololo, S.S. and Seeletse, S.M. (2025) Borehole Water Quality and Health Risks in Rural Communities: A Consumer Perceptive Analysis. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 7, 420-429.[CrossRef]
[15] Mosase, E. and Ahiablame, L. (2018) Rainfall and Temperature in the Limpopo River Basin, Southern Africa: Means, Variations, and Trends from 1979 to 2013. Water, 10, Article No. 364.[CrossRef]
[16] World Health Organization (2022) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Fourth Edition Incorporating the First and Second Addenda. World Health Organization.
[17] Mabe, C.J., Molefe, D.M. and Gololo, S.S. (2024) Investigating the Presence and Levels of Some Selected Chemical Parameters in Borehole Water of Ga-Matlala in Limpopo Province, South Africa: Determining the Potential Risks. Environmental Health Insights, 18, 1-2.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Custodio, M., De la Cruz, H., Huarcaya, J. and Huanay, Y. (2025) Tap Water Quality from Surface and Groundwater Sources in Rural and Urban Communities Evaluated in Contrasting Climatic Seasons and Its Implications for Public Health. Journal of Water and Health, 23, 1196-1214.[CrossRef]
[19] Maluleke, T.P., Dube, S., Sunkari, E.D. and Ambushe, A.A. (2025) Assessment of Borehole Water Quality in Nwadzekudzeku Village, Giyani, Limpopo Province, South Africa: Implication for Potential Human Health Risks. Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals, 11, Article ID: 100206.[CrossRef]
[20] Heaviside, C., Witham, C. and Vardoulakis, S. (2021) Potential Health Impacts from Sulphur Dioxide and Sulphate Exposure in the UK Resulting from an Icelandic Effusive Volcanic Eruption. Science of the Total Environment, 774, Article ID: 145549.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Fuge, R. (2019) Fluorine in the Environment, a Review of Its Sources and Geochemistry. Applied Geochemistry, 100, 393-406.[CrossRef]
[22] Guissouma, W., Hakami, O., Al-Rajab, A.J. and Tarhouni, J. (2017) Risk Assessment of Fluoride Exposure in Drinking Water of Tunisia. Chemosphere, 177, 102-108.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Stadler, S., Talma, A., Tredoux, G. and Wrabel, J. (2012) Identification of Sources and Infiltration Regimes of Nitrate in the Semi-Arid Kalahari: Regional Differences and Implications for Groundwater Management. Water SA, 38, 213-224.[CrossRef]
[24] Fossen Johnson, S. (2019) Methemoglobinemia: Infants at Risk. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 49, 57-67.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ma, L., Hu, L., Feng, X. and Wang, S. (2018) Nitrate and Nitrite in Health and Disease. Aging and disease, 9, Article No. 938.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Lacalamita, D., Mongioví, C. and Crini, G. (2024) Chemical Oxygen Demand and Biochemical Oxygen Demand Analysis of Discharge Waters from Laundry Industry: Monitoring, Temporal Variability, and Biodegradability. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, Article ID:1387041.[CrossRef]
[27] Adeyemi, A.I. (2020) Bacteriological and Physicochemical Quality of Borehole Water Used for Drinking at Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology, Okitipupa, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 5, 890-897.[CrossRef]
[28] Hama Aziz, K.H., Mustafa, F.S., Omer, K.M., Hama, S., Hamarawf, R.F. and Rahman, K.O. (2023) Heavy Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment: Efficient and Low-Cost Removal Approaches to Eliminate Their Toxicity: A Review. RSC Advances, 13, 17595-17610.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Acosta, J.A., Jansen, B., Kalbitz, K., Faz, A. and Martínez-Martínez, S. (2011) Salinity Increases Mobility of Heavy Metals in Soils. Chemosphere, 85, 1318-1324.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Deng, H., Tu, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Chai, L., et al. (2022) Environmental Behavior, Human Health Effect, and Pollution Control of Heavy Metal(loid)s toward Full Life Cycle Processes. Eco-Environment & Health, 1, 229-243.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Liu, W., Qin, D., Yang, Y. and Guo, G. (2023) Enrichment of Manganese at Low Background Level Groundwater Systems: A Study of Groundwater from Quaternary Porous Aquifers in Changping Region, Beijing, China. Water, 15, Article No. 1537.[CrossRef]
[32] DeVore, C.L., Rodriguez-Freire, L., Villa, N., Soleimanifar, M., Gonzalez-Estrella, J., Ali, A.M.S., et al. (2022) Mobilization of As, Fe, and Mn from Contaminated Sediment in Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions: Chemical or Microbiological Triggers? ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 6, 1644-1654.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Odewade, L.O., Imam, A.A., Adesakin, T.A. and Odewade, J.O. (2025) Assessment of Human Faecal Contamination on Groundwater Quality and Reporting Consequent Waterborne Diseases in Funtua Metropolis, Katsina State, Nigeria. Frontiers in Water, 7, Article ID: 1561777.[CrossRef]
[34] Xiao, Q., Wang, B., Li, Z., Zhang, Z., Xie, K., Zhou, J., et al. (2024) The Assembly Process and Co-Occurrence Network of Soil Microbial Community Driven by Cadmium in Volcanic Ecosystem. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 17, Article ID: 100164.[CrossRef]
[35] Kristanti, R.A., Hadibarata, T., Syafrudin, M., Yılmaz, M. and Abdullah, S. (2022) Microbiological Contaminants in Drinking Water: Current Status and Challenges. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 233, Article No. 299.[CrossRef]
[36] Lin, L., Yang, H. and Xu, X. (2022) Effects of Water Pollution on Human Health and Disease Heterogeneity: A Review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article ID: 880246.[CrossRef]
[37] Ben Maamar, S., Aquilina, L., Quaiser, A., Pauwels, H., Michon-Coudouel, S., Vergnaud-Ayraud, V., et al. (2015) Groundwater Isolation Governs Chemistry and Microbial Community Structure along Hydrologic Flowpaths. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article No. 1457.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Said, I., Abd-Elgawad, A.N., Seleem, E.M., Zeid, S.A.M. and Salman, S.A. (2022) Multivariate Statistics Explaining Groundwater Chemistry, Asyut, Egypt. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, Article No. 669.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.