Clinical Observation of Intermittent Catheterization Combined with Auricular Point Pressing Therapy for Neurogenic Bladder Following Spinal Cord Injury ()
1. Introduction
Neurogenic bladder (NB) is one of the most common complications following spinal cord injury (SCI), characterized by lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from impaired bladder and urethral function due to damage to the nervous system. This condition not only severely compromises patients’ physical and mental health and markedly reduces their quality of life, but also imposes significant limitations on daily activities while increasing the burden on family caregiving and household economics [1]-[4]. Without timely and standardized management, NB may lead to serious complications such as urinary tract infections, hydronephrosis, and even renal failure, potentially posing life-threatening risks [5]. Currently, intermittent catheterization is recommended by the International Continence Society (ICS) as the preferred safe method for achieving regular bladder emptying in patients with neurogenic bladder and is widely regarded as the clinical “gold standard” for its management [6]. However, the use of intermittent catheterization alone has demonstrated limited efficacy in promoting bladder functional recovery and preventing long-term complications, underscoring the need for more comprehensive and effective therapeutic strategies in clinical practice [7]. In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), NB is classified under the syndromes of “Lóngbì” and “Yínlì”, with its core pathogenesis attributed to kidney yang deficiency, impaired qi transformation in the bladder, and obstruction of meridian circulation [8]. Auricular points, as somatic reflex zones corresponding to internal organs and physiological systems, can modulate the neuro-humoral regulatory mechanisms and enhance detrusor muscle contractility and coordination through targeted stimulation [9]. Based on the “Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Neurogenic Bladder” and integrating principles of TCM syndrome differentiation and treatment, this study implemented a combined regimen of intermittent catheterization and auricular point pressure therapy in patients with NB following SCI, and systematically evaluated its clinical efficacy, aiming to provide an optimized treatment approach and evidence-based support for the comprehensive rehabilitation of these patients. The findings are presented below.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Participants and Baseline Characteristics
2.1.1. Sampling Method and Sample Size
A total of 70 patients diagnosed with neurogenic bladder (NB) following spinal cord injury (SCI) were enrolled at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University between January 2023 and June 2025. Participants were randomly assigned to either the observation group or the control group using a random number table, with 35 patients in each group. Sample size estimation was conducted using G*Power 3.1.9.4 software. Based on data from previous comparable studies [7], the primary outcome was defined as the reduction in post-void residual urine volume, with an effect size (f) of 0.25, a two-tailed significance level (α) of 0.05, statistical power (1 − β) of 0.80, and an anticipated dropout rate of 20%. The calculation yielded a minimum required sample size of 32 participants per group. To ensure sufficient statistical power to detect clinically meaningful intergroup differences, 35 participants were ultimately included per group, resulting in a total sample size of 70.
2.1.2. Baseline Characteristics
The observation group consisted of 21 males and 14 females, with ages ranging from 19 to 51 years (mean ± SD: 43.48 ± 10.12 years), NB duration of 1 to 3 months (mean ± SD: 1.48 ± 0.62 months), and lesion levels distributed across the thoracic spinal cord (n = 8) and lumbar spinal cord (n = 27). The control group included 22 males and 13 females, aged 21 to 50 years (mean ± SD: 45.23 ± 10.76 years), with NB duration of 1 to 3 months (mean ± SD: 1.51 ± 0.56 months), and lesion levels at the thoracic spinal cord (n = 10) and lumbar spinal cord (n = 25). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of sex distribution, age, duration of NB, or lesion level (P = 0.836, P = 0.452, P = 0.817, P = 0.643; all P > 0.05), indicating baseline homogeneity. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.
2.2. Diagnostic Criteria
The diagnostic criteria for Western medicine were established according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurogenic Bladder [10] [11].
The Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnostic criteria were based on the diagnostic standards for “flaccidity syndrome” (wei zheng) and “dysuria and anuria” (long bi), as defined in the Standards for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effect of TCM Internal Diseases [12].
2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.3.1. Inclusion Criteria
1) Met the diagnostic criteria of both traditional Chinese and Western medicine, presenting with symptoms such as difficulty in urination and bladder distension, and a residual urine volume > 100 mL; 2) Duration of spinal cord injury <3 months; 3) Age between 18 and 55 years, with stable vital signs, clear consciousness, expected survival >3 months, and ability to cooperate with treatment and clearly express informed consent; 4) Spinal cord injury located in the thoracolumbar segment and classified as incomplete spinal cord injury; 5) Provided written informed consent and demonstrated good compliance.
2.3.2. Exclusion Criteria
1) Failure to meet the established diagnostic criteria; 2) History of urinary system surgery, including cystostomy, anterior urethral sphincterotomy, or artificial urethral sphincter implantation; 3) Presence of concurrent organic conditions such as prostate cancer or severe urinary tract infection; 4) Development of severe complications during treatment necessitating study withdrawal; 5) Presence of psychiatric disorders or cognitive dysfunction; 6) Intolerance to or allergy to auricular therapy; 7) Contraindications to intermittent catheterization; 8) Inability to cooperate with the intervention or at high risk of loss to follow-up.
2.4. Methods
2.4.1. Control Group
The control group received simple intermittent catheterization as the primary intervention. Conventional management was implemented in accordance with the “Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Neurogenic Bladder” [11] and the “Practice Guidelines for Neurogenic Bladder Nursing” [13]. Specific interventions included: 1) Bladder function training: encompassing manual massage, reflex voiding training, pelvic floor muscle exercises, and micturition awareness training; 2) Intermittent catheterization: individualized catheterization schedules were developed based on each patient’s residual urine volume, with strict adherence to aseptic techniques; 3) Fluid intake management: patients were instructed to follow a structured drinking regimen, with total daily fluid intake maintained at 1500 - 2000 mL, evenly distributed between 6:00 and 20:00, no more than 400 mL per intake, and no fluids consumed between 20:00 and 6:00 the following day. Detailed bladder diaries were recorded throughout the study period.
2.4.2. Observation Group
Auricular seed pressure therapy was added to the treatment regimen of the control group. Acupoint selection was based on the *13th Five-Year Plan* textbook *Meridians and Acupoints* [14], targeting the following acupoints: Kidney (Shen), Bladder (Pangguang), Sympathetic (Jiaogan), Superior Tragic Angle (Tingjiao), Subcortex (Pizhixia), and Triple Energizer (Sanjiao). The procedure was as follows: after routine disinfection of the auricle skin, Vaccaria segetalis seeds were applied to the selected acupoints using the single-ear application method. Each acupoint was stimulated three times daily for 5 minutes per session, with pressure intensity adjusted to a level that was tolerable for the patient and did not induce obvious pain. Pressure intensity was assessed using the Pressure Perception Scale—a 0 - 10 numerical rating scale in which 0 represented no pressure sensation and 10 represented the maximum tolerable pressure or severe discomfort. During stimulation, operators gradually increased pressure while simultaneously asking patients to report their current perception level. The stimulation was terminated when patients reported a subjective sensation of “soreness and distension without obvious pain.” To ensure consistency and reproducibility of pressure application across participants, all operators underwent standardized training in uniform vertical pressing techniques, applying pressure for 1 second per press before release. Technique accuracy was subject to random inspection by senior Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practitioners. Seed patches were replaced every 3 days and alternated between ears. Treatment efficacy was evaluated following 2 months of continuous intervention in both groups.
2.5. Observation Indicators
Urinary function, clinical symptoms, bladder function parameters, quality of life, and clinical efficacy were assessed and compared between the two groups before and after treatment.
2.5.1. Urinary Function and Urinary Tract Infection
Daily water intake, frequency of urination, average single voiding volume, and episodes of urinary incontinence were recorded before and after treatment. The incidence of urinary tract infection was also documented.
2.5.2. Clinical Symptoms and Bladder Function
The severity of dysuria, urethral pain, and lower abdominal distension was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity [15]. Maximum bladder capacity and residual urine volume were measured using a simplified bladder volume-pressure measurement technique.
2.5.3. Quality of Life
The Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOL-74) was used to assess four domains: psychological function, physical function, social function, and material life. Each domain is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life [16]. Changes in GQOL-74 domain scores before and after treatment were evaluated in both patient groups.
2.5.4. Clinical Efficacy
Clinical efficacy criteria were established based on the “Clinical Diagnosis and Cure and Improvement Standards for Diseases” and the “International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury” [17] [18]. Efficacy was categorized as follows: Marked improvement: Patients achieved independent urination post-treatment, with basic recovery of urinary function and balanced bladder function, and residual urine volume ≤ 100 mL; Improvement: Patients achieved independent urination post-treatment, with significant improvement in urinary function and a reduction in residual urine volume by 100 - 200 mL; No improvement: Residual urine volume remained >200 mL or patients failed to achieve independent urination after treatment. The total effective rate (%) was calculated as: (number of marked improvement cases + number of improvement cases)/total number of cases × 100% [19].
2.6. Statistical Methods
Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Measurement data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (). Within-group comparisons before and after treatment were performed using paired t-tests, and between-group comparisons were conducted using independent samples t-tests. Categorical data are expressed as percentages (%) and analyzed using the chi-square (χ2) test. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Comparison of Baseline Characteristics between Groups
As shown in Table 1, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics—including sex, age, and disease duration—between the observation group and the control group (P = 0.836, P = 0.452, P = 0.817, P = 0.643; all P > 0.05). These results indicate that the baseline variables were well balanced across groups, supporting the validity of intergroup comparisons. Full details are provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of patients with neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury ().
Group |
n |
sex [n] |
Age (years) |
Course of illness (months) |
Injury Site [n] |
Male |
Female |
Thoracic Spinal Cord |
Lumbar Spinal Cord |
Observation |
35 |
21 |
14 |
43.48 ± 10.12 |
1.48 ± 0.62 |
8 |
27 |
Control |
35 |
22 |
13 |
45.23 ± 10.76 |
1.51 ± 0.56 |
10 |
25 |
Note: The control group received conventional treatment, while the observation group received additional auricular point pressure therapy based on the same conventional regimen.
3.2. Comparison of Urinary Function and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Outcomes Before and After Intervention between Groups
As shown in Table 2, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline variables—including daily water intake, 24-hour voiding frequency, mean single voided volume, urinary incontinence episodes, and UTI incidence—between the observation group and the control group (P = 0.912, P = 0.876, P = 0.734, P = 0.901, P = 0.857; all P > 0.05). These results indicate that the baseline characteristics were well balanced across groups, supporting the validity of intergroup comparisons. Following intervention, both groups showed significant reductions in 24-hour voiding frequency, urinary incontinence episodes, and UTI incidence, as well as a significant increase in mean single voided volume (all P < 0.05). Importantly, the magnitude of improvement in these outcomes was greater in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant between-group differences (P = 0.021, P = 0.018, P = 0.039, P = 0.024; all P < 0.05). Complete data are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Comparison of voiding diary parameters, urinary incontinence episodes, and urinary tract infection (UTI) incidence before and after intervention in patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury (SCI) between groups ().
Group |
n |
Time |
Daily Water Intake (mL) |
Daily
Urination
Frequency
(times) |
Mean Single Urination Volume (mL) |
Urinary Incontinence Episodes
(times) |
Urinary
Tract Infection
(n) |
Observation |
35 |
Pre-treatment |
1283.28 ± 178.49 |
16.29 ± 3.52 |
43.19 ± 22.36 |
7.42 ± 2.46 |
11 |
Post-treatment |
1416.23 ± 141.56 |
8.68 ± 2.13①② |
270.48 ± 42.78①② |
3.62 ± 1.41①② |
2①② |
Control |
35 |
Pre-treatment |
1265.85 ± 172.63 |
15.83 ± 3.12 |
46.48 ± 28.12 |
7.26 ± 2.23 |
12 |
Post-treatment |
1387.42 ± 138.21 |
11.68 ± 2.54① |
226.23 ± 40.86① |
4.89 ± 1.69① |
5① |
Note: ①P < 0.05, compared with baseline within the same group; ②P < 0.05, compared with the control group after intervention.
3.3. Comparison of Symptom Scores and Bladder Function Parameters between the Two Groups before and after Intervention
Table 3. Comparison of symptom scores and bladder function parameters in patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury between the two groups ().
Group |
n |
Time |
Dysuria (Score) |
Urethral Pain (Score) |
Lower Abdominal Distension (Score) |
Max Bladder Capacity
(mL) |
Residual
Volume (mL) |
Observation |
35 |
Pre-treatment |
4.85 ± 1.55 |
4.52 ± 1.27 |
4.67 ± 1.28 |
243.54 ± 35.76 |
125.78 ± 35.74 |
Post-treatment |
2.45 ± 0.87①② |
2.62 ± 0.74①② |
3.14 ± 0.98①② |
308.75 ± 48.83①② |
78.45 ± 21.36①② |
Control |
35 |
Pre-treatment |
4.68 ± 1.48 |
4.64 ± 1.23 |
4.73 ± 1.32 |
242.23 ± 34.97 |
127.36 ± 31.02 |
Post-treatment |
3.23 ± 0.96① |
2.83 ± 0.78① |
3.48 ± 0.78① |
287.79 ± 49.98① |
89.96 ± 25.17① |
Note: ①P < 0.05, compared with baseline within the same group; ②P < 0.05, compared with the control group after intervention.
As shown in Table 3, prior to intervention, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in dysuria, urethral discomfort, lower abdominal heaviness, maximum bladder capacity, or residual urine volume (P = 0.765, P = 0.812, P = 0.793, P = 0.687, P = 0.724; all P > 0.05), indicating well-balanced baseline characteristics. After intervention, both groups showed significant reductions in symptom scores and residual urine volume, as well as a significant increase in maximum bladder capacity (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, the observation group exhibited significantly lower symptom scores, greater maximum bladder capacity, and lower residual urine volume compared with the control group, with statistically significant intergroup differences (P = 0.017, P = 0.033, P = 0.029, P = 0.008, P = 0.014; all P < 0.05). Detailed data are provided in Table 3.
3.4. Comparison of Quality of Life Scores between the Two Groups before and after Intervention
Results in Table 4 demonstrated that prior to intervention, no statistically significant differences were observed in psychological function, physical function, social function, and material well-being scores between the two groups (P = 0.823, P = 0.765, P = 0.801, P = 0.789; all P > 0.05), indicating comparable baseline quality of life across groups. Following intervention, quality of life scores in all dimensions significantly improved in both groups relative to baseline (all P < 0.05); furthermore, the observation group showed higher scores than the control group in all domains, with statistically significant differences (P = 0.036, P = 0.023, P = 0.041, P = 0.039; all P < 0.05). Detailed data are presented in Table 2.
Table 4. Comparison of quality of life scores before and after intervention in patients with neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury (, points).
Group |
n |
Time |
Psychological Function (Score) |
Physical Function (Score) |
Social Function (Score) |
Material Life (Score) |
Observation |
35 |
Pre-treatment |
52.31 ± 6.75 |
47.89 ± 5.52 |
62.19 ± 8.36 |
62.56 ± 8.56 |
Post-treatment |
78.23 ± 5.56①② |
74.68 ± 6.54①② |
79.89 ± 5.78①② |
76.02 ± 8.81①② |
Control |
35 |
Pre-treatment |
52.85 ± 7.13 |
48.23 ± 5.12 |
65.32 ± 8.12 |
61.02 ± 8.63 |
Post-treatment |
65.42 ± 6.21① |
60.68 ± 6.13① |
71.23 ± 6.56① |
74.69 ± 9.39① |
Note: ①P < 0.05, compared with baseline within the same group; ②P < 0.05, compared with the control group after intervention.
3.5. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between the Two Groups
The results presented in Table 5 indicate that the overall response rate (ORR) in the observation group was 91.43%, significantly higher than the 82.86% observed in the control group. A between-group comparison demonstrated that the observation group exhibited superior clinical efficacy compared to the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.047; P < 0.05). Detailed data are provided in Table 5.
Table 5. Comparison of clinical efficacy in patients with neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury (n, %).
Group |
n |
Clinical Efficacy [n (%)] |
Marked Improvement |
Improvement |
No improvement |
Overall Improvement Rate |
Observation |
35 |
23 (65.71) |
9 (25.71) |
3 (8.57) |
32 (91.43)① |
Control |
35 |
18 (51.43) |
11 (31.43) |
6 (17.14) |
29 (82.86) |
Note: ①P < 0.05, compared with the control group.
4. Discussion
4.1. Pathological Mechanisms of Neurogenic Bladder following Spinal Cord Injury and the Theoretical Foundation of Auricular Point Stimulation Therapy
The core pathological mechanism of neurogenic bladder (NB) following spinal cord injury involves disruption of the neural regulatory pathways, leading to impaired coordination between the detrusor muscle and the urethral sphincter, which in turn results in abnormal urination [20]. Intermittent catheterization effectively reduces residual urine accumulation and lowers the risk of urinary tract infections by ensuring regular bladder emptying. However, it does not address the underlying neural damage or restore bladder qi transformation function, and symptom improvement remains suboptimal in some patients [21]. In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the ear is considered the “convergence of all meridians,” with the auricle closely connected to internal organs and meridian systems. Auricular point pressing, a key component of TCM external therapies, exerts therapeutic effects through stimulation of auricular nerve endings, modulation of the body’s neuro-humoral balance, enhancement of local bladder blood circulation, and facilitation of detrusor muscle functional recovery [22]. In this study, specific auricular points—including kidney, bladder, sympathetic, and subcortical—were selected. The kidney point serves to warm and tonify kidney yang and consolidate kidney qi; the bladder point directly regulates bladder qi transformation; the sympathetic and subcortical points jointly modulate autonomic nervous function; and the triple energizer point promotes water channel regulation. Collectively, these points contribute to warming the kidney, strengthening the spleen, unblocking meridians, and restoring normal bladder qi transformation [23].
4.2. The Synergistic Mechanisms and Intervention Pathways of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in Auricular Point Stimulation Combined with Intermittent Catheterization
Ear acupressure, derived from traditional Chinese acupuncture, is a key component of this therapeutic system. According to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory, auricular points serve as critical hubs for information exchange and integration between the body and internal organs, meridians, and tissues. The application of Vaccaria segetalis seeds to the auricle helps regulate visceral yin-yang balance, unblock meridians, and promote the circulation of qi and blood. In the management of urinary retention due to neurogenic bladder (NB) following spinal cord injury, auricular acupressure stimulates auricular nerves, exerts a bidirectional regulatory effect, modulates neurohumoral factors, enhances blood perfusion in the detrusor muscle’s local vasculature, promotes tissue functional recovery, and restores physiological homeostasis [24]. Modern medical research further demonstrates that auricular stimulation can regulate the coordination between the detrusor and sphincter muscles via the vagus nerve pathway, facilitate the release of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, and improve bladder innervation [25]. Meanwhile, intermittent catheterization prevents detrusor damage caused by excessive bladder distension and creates favorable conditions for neural functional recovery [26]. The combination of intermittent catheterization and ear acupressure in treating post-spinal cord injury NB achieves a synergistic effect—“Western medicine addresses the symptoms, while TCM treats the root cause”—enabling not only rapid alleviation of clinical manifestations but also holistic regulation of bodily functions. This integrated approach offers a safe, effective, and innovative therapeutic strategy for patients with NB.
4.3. Effects of Combined Therapy on Clinical Symptoms,
Urodynamic Parameters, and Quality of Life
The results of this study demonstrate that, following treatment, the observation group had significantly lower daily urinary frequency and fewer episodes of urinary incontinence, as well as a significantly higher mean urine volume per void, compared to the control group (P = 0.021, P = 0.018, P = 0.024). These findings indicate that adjunctive auricular point pressure using vaccaria seeds can effectively improve micturition rhythm and urinary efficiency, potentially through enhanced detrusor muscle contractility and facilitation of the micturition reflex via somato-autonomic modulation [27]. The incidence of urinary tract infections was also reduced in the observation group (P = 0.039), suggesting a lower risk of complications, which may be attributable to improved bladder emptying and decreased mucosal irritation from residual urine [28]. In terms of symptom severity and urodynamic parameters, the observation group exhibited greater improvements in dysuria and urethral discomfort, along with increased maximum cystometric capacity and reduced post-void residual urine volume (P = 0.017, P = 0.033, P = 0.008, P = 0.014), highlighting the synergistic effects of integrating traditional Chinese medicine with conventional therapy in optimizing bladder function and alleviating clinical symptoms [29]. Moreover, quality-of-life assessments showed superior outcomes in the observation group across psychological, physical, and social functioning domains (P = 0.036, P = 0.023, P = 0.041), indicating that the combined intervention not only ameliorates physiological impairments but also alleviates psychological distress and enhances social reintegration. Additionally, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the observation group (P = 0.047), underscoring the enhanced clinical value of this integrative approach [30] [31].
5. Conclusion
This study’s innovation lies in the systematic integration of auricular acupoint stimulation with standard Western medical management, offering an optimized strategy for the comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury. However, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, due to the visible application of vaccaria seeds on the auricle, blinding of participants and personnel was not feasible, raising the possibility of placebo effects and observer bias. To minimize these potential biases, standardized protocols for outcome assessment and intervention delivery were strictly followed; urodynamic and voiding parameters were assessed by independent third-party healthcare providers who were blinded to group assignment; patient-reported outcomes—including quality-of-life measures—were collected through self-administered questionnaires to reduce subjective interpretation; and rigorous guidelines for urination diary completion were implemented, with regular audits to ensure data completeness and accuracy. Second, the relatively small sample size and short follow-up period limit the generalizability of the findings and preclude definitive conclusions about long-term efficacy and safety. Future studies should include larger, multicenter cohorts with extended follow-up durations to confirm these results. Furthermore, the incorporation of a sham auricular point stimulation control—where seeds are applied to non-acupoints—would enhance methodological rigor by better distinguishing specific therapeutic effects from nonspecific or placebo-related responses, thereby strengthening the overall level of evidence. In conclusion, intermittent catheterization combined with auricular point pressure seeds constitutes a safe, effective, and clinically practical integrative approach for managing neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury. This combination therapy significantly improves urinary function, reduces symptom burden, and enhances quality of life, supporting its broader implementation in clinical settings.
Funding
This research was supported by the Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 20242015).
NOTES
*Co-First author.
#Corresponding author.