Analysis of HIV/AIDS Knowledge Awareness and Influencing Factors among College Students at a University in a Border Region of Yunnan Province ()
1. Introduction
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), caused by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, represents a chronic infectious disease with high mortality [1] that poses sustained challenges to public health systems globally. In recent years, China has witnessed concerning trends in HIV infections among young students, with annual increases in infection rates. Inadequate sexual health knowledge and limited HIV awareness constitute primary risk factors for elevated transmission risks [2]. Contemporary Chinese university students demonstrate increased sexual activity [3] alongside insufficient sexual health literacy [4], resulting in widespread deficits in HIV/AIDS knowledge [5] [6].
Yunnan Province, designated as a priority region for HIV prevention and control in China, faces unique challenges in its border areas. Geographic remoteness, multicultural demographics, and inequitable health education resource distribution [7] render local university students particularly vulnerable populations in HIV prevention efforts. Previous research has documented low HIV knowledge awareness rates and weak risk prevention consciousness among this demographic [8], further intensifying regional prevention pressures. This study investigated HIV/AIDS knowledge and determinants among university students at a Yunnan border institution to establish current knowledge status and influencing factors, thereby providing scientific evidence for targeted HIV prevention education in border regions.
2. Subjects and Methods
2.1. Study Population
The survey was conducted between November 2024 and February 2025, enrolling 1017 undergraduate students from a university located in a border area of Yunnan Province.
Inclusion criteria: 1) Full-time enrollment at the target university in Yunnan Province; 2) Capability for independent electronic questionnaire completion; 3) Voluntary participation with informed consent.
Exclusion criteria: 1) Incomplete or improperly completed questionnaires; 2) Refusal to participate; 3) Response time < 2 minutes.
2.2. Survey Methods
2.2.1. Survey Instrument and Content
An anonymous online survey was distributed via the Wenjuanxing platform in November 2024. The questionnaire was developed based on China’s National Plan for HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control (2024-2030) [9] and the National AIDS Sentinel Surveillance Manual (Youth Students) [10], with adjustments to reflect university student demographics and contemporary HIV prevention evidence.
The instrument included three sections: 1) demographic characteristics (gender, ethnicity, residential origin); 2) HIV/AIDS knowledge (terminology, transmission/non-transmission routes); and 3) attitudes and behaviors (active information-seeking, prior HIV education exposure). The 20-item knowledge domain was scored out of 100 (5 points per correct response; 0 for incorrect/missing answers). Adequate knowledge awareness was defined as a score ≥75 points—consistent with the National AIDS Sentinel Surveillance Manual (Youth Students) [10], which specifies “correct responses to ≥75% of knowledge items” as the threshold for adequate awareness. This aligns with standard protocols for HIV surveillance and health education evaluation among young people in China.
2.2.2. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.0 on data obtained from the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables, with continuous measures expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical measures reported as frequency counts with corresponding percentages [n (%)]. Between-group comparisons employed chi-square tests. Variables with P < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included in binary logistic regression models, with significance set at α = 0.05.
2.2.3. Quality Control
The survey employed an anonymous completion method, requiring respondents to answer independently. Through the Questionnaire Star platform, each IP address was restricted to a single submission to prevent duplicate entries. A pre-survey was conducted from September to October 2024 to test the questionnaire’s logical flow, item clarity, and content appropriateness. Based on pre-survey feedback, ambiguous or potentially misleading items were refined, and the survey tool was optimized. During the formal survey period, a dedicated quality control team monitored the progress of electronic questionnaire collection and data integrity in real time. After the survey concluded, all responses were reviewed individually to exclude invalid questionnaires with logical inconsistencies, missing key information, or abnormally short completion times (<2 minutes), ensuring the authenticity and reliability of the data.
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
Of 1017 distributed questionnaires, 923 valid responses were obtained (validity rate: 90.8%). Participants included 424 males (45.9%) and 499 females (54.1%); 528 Han Chinese (57.2%) and 395 ethnic minorities (42.8%); 484 urban residents (52.4%) and 439 rural residents (47.6%); 364 first-year students (39.4%) and 559 second-year and above (60.6%); 470 medical students (50.9%) and 453 non-medical students (49.1%). Details are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants (N = 923).
Characteristic |
n |
Proportion (%) |
Sex |
|
|
Male |
424 |
45.9 |
Women |
499 |
54.1 |
Ethnic group |
|
|
Han |
528 |
57.2 |
National minority |
395 |
42.8 |
Residence |
|
|
Urban |
484 |
52.4 |
Rural |
439 |
47.6 |
Grade |
|
|
Fresh year |
364 |
39.4 |
Sophomore and above |
559 |
60.6 |
Major |
|
|
Medicine |
470 |
50.9 |
Others |
453 |
49.1 |
3.2. HIV/AIDS Knowledge Awareness
The three items with highest awareness rates were: “Sexual contact with HIV patients does guarantee transmission” (85.9%), “Sharing injection equipment with HIV-infected individuals transmits HIV” (85.6%), and “Hugging or handshaking with HIV-infected individuals does not transmit HIV” (83.7%).Conversely, the three items with lowest awareness rates were: “Primary HIV transmission routes” (45.7%), “World AIDS Day date” (55.4%), and “Absence of curative HIV treatments in China” (57.0%). Complete results are shown in Table 2, Figure 1.
Table 2. The awareness rate of knowledge related to AIDS.
AIDS-related knowledge |
Number of people who know |
Awareness rate/% |
You can’t get HIV from eating with someone who has it. |
745 |
80.7 |
It is not possible to be infected with HIV by studying in the same classroom for a long time with someone who has HIV. |
771 |
83.5 |
Sharing syringes with people infected with AIDS can lead to HIV infection. |
791 |
85.6 |
Hugging or shaking hands with an AIDS patient will not lead to the transmission of AIDS. |
773 |
83.7 |
Having sexual relations with an AIDS patient will not lead to the transmission of AIDS. |
793 |
85.9 |
China has not successfully developed a drug for treating AIDS. |
527 |
57.0 |
The main mode of transmission of AIDS |
422 |
45.7 |
The date of “World AIDS Day” |
512 |
55.4 |
Kissing an AIDS patient will not lead to the transmission of AIDS. |
550 |
59.5 |
Being bitten by mosquitoes will not lead to the transmission of AIDS. |
680 |
73.6 |
Knowledge of AIDS |
608 |
65.9 |
Figure 1. HIV/AIDS knowledge awareness across specific items, ranked by performance.
3.3. Univariate Analysis of Factors Influencing HIV/AIDS
Knowledge
Univariate analysis (Table 3) revealed significant differences in HIV/AIDS knowledge awareness across various student characteristics. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed for gender, ethnicity, academic year, major, active HIV knowledge-seeking, prior HIV education, and sexual experience.
Figure 2 visually illustrates the distribution of HIV/AIDS knowledge status (aware vs. unaware) across these subgroups.
Specifically: females showed higher awareness (69.3%) than males (61.8%); Han students (69.5%) exceeded ethnic minorities (61.0%); second-year and above students (69.8%) surpassed freshmen (59.9%); medical students (69.1%) outperformed non-medical students (62.5%); active knowledge seekers (78.2%) significantly exceeded passive recipients (44.5%); those with prior HIV education (68.5%) surpassed those without (60.3%); sexually experienced students showed lower awareness (63.5%) than inexperienced peers (80.2%).
No significant differences were observed for residence, HIV testing/counseling experience at medical facilities, or unprotected sexual intercourse history (P > 0.05).
Table 3. Univariate analysis of factors affecting college students’ awareness of AIDS-related knowledge.
Projects |
n |
known |
unknown |
χ2 value |
P value |
Sex |
|
|
|
5.806 |
0.016 |
Male |
424 |
262 |
162 |
|
|
Women |
499 |
346 |
153 |
|
|
Ethnic group |
|
|
|
7.253 |
0.007 |
Han |
528 |
367 |
161 |
|
|
National minority |
395 |
241 |
154 |
|
|
Residence |
|
|
|
1.864 |
0.172 |
Urban |
484 |
309 |
175 |
|
|
Rural |
439 |
299 |
140 |
|
|
Grade |
|
|
|
9.567 |
0.002 |
Fresh year |
364 |
218 |
146 |
|
|
Sophomore and above |
559 |
390 |
169 |
|
|
Major |
|
|
|
4.574 |
0.032 |
Medicine |
470 |
325 |
145 |
|
|
Others |
453 |
283 |
170 |
|
|
Have you ever actively sought out information related to AIDS? |
|
|
|
108.426 |
<0.001 |
yes |
584 |
457 |
127 |
|
|
no |
339 |
151 |
188 |
|
|
Have you received any education related to AIDS? |
|
|
|
5.954 |
0.015 |
yes |
631 |
432 |
199 |
|
|
no |
292 |
176 |
116 |
|
|
Have there been any instances where medical and health institutions have conducted HIV testing or provided counseling? |
|
|
|
0.432 |
0.511 |
yes |
414 |
268 |
146 |
|
|
no |
509 |
340 |
169 |
|
|
Have you ever engaged in sexual intercourse without using a condom? |
|
|
|
5.986 |
0.050 |
yes |
413 |
266 |
147 |
|
|
no |
233 |
144 |
89 |
|
|
no sexual experience |
277 |
198 |
79 |
|
|
Have you ever had sexual intercourse? |
|
|
|
13.849 |
<0.001 |
yes |
792 |
503 |
289 |
|
|
no |
131 |
105 |
26 |
|
|
![]()
Figure 2. HIV/AIDS knowledge status distribution across student groups (diverging bar chart).
3.4. Multivariate Analysis of Factors Influencing HIV/AIDS
Knowledge
Binary logistic regression analysis incorporating significant univariate variables (Table 4) identified active HIV knowledge-seeking, sexual experience, academic year, and major as independent influencing factors (P < 0.05).
Specifically, proactive acquisition of AIDS-related knowledge is significantly associated with enhanced AIDS knowledge awareness (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 3.35 - 5.99, P < 0.001), indicating that individuals who actively seek such knowledge have a 4.48-fold higher probability of awareness compared to those who do not. Likewise, a medical background constitutes a positive factor (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.02 - 1.77, P = 0.033), with medical students demonstrating a 1.35-fold greater awareness probability than non-medical students. Conversely, first-year student status is a negative factor (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49 - 0.85, P = 0.002), as their awareness probability is only 0.65 times that of students in their second year or above.
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting college students’ knowledge of AIDS.
Projects |
β |
SE |
χ2 |
P |
OR |
95% CI |
Have you ever engaged in sexual activity? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
no |
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
yes |
−0.84 |
0.23 |
11.70 |
<0.001 |
0.43 |
0.27 - 0.68 |
Major |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-medical field |
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Medicine |
0.30 |
0.14 |
8.12 |
0.033 |
1.35 |
1.02 - 1.77 |
Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sophomore and above |
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Fresh year |
−0.44 |
0.14 |
4.82 |
0.002 |
0.65 |
0.49 - 0.85 |
Have you ever actively sought out information related to AIDS? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
no |
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
yes |
1.50 |
0.15 |
99.80 |
<0.001 |
4.48 |
3.35 - 5.99 |
4. Discussion
As a major global public health challenge, HIV/AIDS prevention effectiveness directly impacts population health and social stability, requiring coordinated societal participation. Our findings reveal that HIV/AIDS knowledge awareness among university students at this Yunnan border institution was 65.9%, with only 0.9% achieving perfect scores. This level falls below findings reported by Sun et al. [11]. and substantially short of requirements outlined in the “Implementation Plan for Curbing HIV Transmission (2019-2022)” [12], highlighting persistent educational gaps in border region universities requiring targeted enhancement.
Examining knowledge details, students demonstrated incomplete understanding of non-transmission routes, with only 73.6% awareness that “mosquito bites do not transmit HIV,” consistent with findings by Zhang et al. [13]. More concerning, awareness rates for critical items including “primary HIV transmission routes”, “World AIDS Day date”, and “absence of curative treatments in China” were merely 45.7%, 55.4%, and 57.0% respectively, revealing cognitive gaps in transmission mechanisms, prevention measures, and disease awareness. These findings suggest border universities should focus on these weak areas, optimizing educational priorities to enhance knowledge dissemination precision.
Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed key determinants of HIV/AIDS knowledge. Medical students’ higher awareness (69.1%) compared to non-medical students (62.5%) aligns with Tang’s findings [14], confirming the importance of professional background in disease knowledge acquisition. Second-year and above students’ significantly higher awareness (69.8%) versus freshmen (59.9%) likely reflects progressive HIV education enhancement through diverse educational formats [15], confirming university as a critical period for HIV health education providing systematic scientific knowledge support. Active HIV knowledge-seeking emerged as the strongest facilitating factor (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 3.35 - 5.99). However, our study found only a minority of students obtained relevant knowledge through school channels, despite school education’s central role in HIV awareness enhancement [16] [17], reflecting insufficient educational provision in border universities. Based on existing practices, schools could normalize HIV prevention education through promotional materials, classroom instruction, thematic activities, and peer education [18] [19], providing knowledge support for students. Notably, multivariate analysis identified sexual experience as a barrier to knowledge (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.27 - 0.68). This finding may stem from three factors: first, some students develop complacency after sexual debut, subconsciously believing HIV is irrelevant to them, losing motivation for active learning; second, insufficient pre-sexual HIV education without subsequent knowledge supplementation leads to cognitive lag; third, some students may deliberately avoid HIV knowledge due to guilt or wishful thinking regarding sexual behavior, unwilling to confront potential risks. These findings suggest targeted educational interventions are needed for sexually active students to break psychological barriers and strengthen risk awareness. To further elucidate the psychological mechanisms linking sexual behavior to knowledge awareness, future studies could utilize qualitative interviews or focus group discussions. This approach would enable a comprehensive examination of the population’s knowledge needs following sexual activity, attitudes towards information access, psychological defense mechanisms, and willingness to engage with education. The insights gained will inform the development of more targeted educational interventions, facilitating the overcoming of psychological barriers and enhancing risk prevention awareness.
In summary, college students in Yunnan’s border regions exhibit low awareness of HIV/AIDS knowledge [20], insufficient mastery of core concepts [21] [22], and weak prevention awareness, indicating that related prevention and control efforts still face significant challenges [23]. Based on research findings and practical experience, three optimization measures are recommended: First, implement targeted knowledge dissemination by focusing on weak knowledge areas such as transmission routes [24] and preventive measures; Second, establish an educational model featuring “multi-party collaboration, multi-course co-education, and multi-teacher co-guidance” [25]. “Multi-party collaboration” should encompass internal university departments (e.g., Student Affairs Office, University Health Center, Youth League Committee, Mental Health Center) and external institutions (e.g., local CDC, community health centers, NGOs like AIDS prevention associations) to form a synergistic educational force; Prioritize key populations including non-medical majors, first-year students, and ethnic minority students. Third, refine the integrated prevention system encompassing “school-society-nation” [26] [27], pooling on- and off-campus resources to stimulate students’ intrinsic motivation for knowledge acquisition through diverse approaches. This will comprehensively enhance HIV prevention awareness and self-protection capabilities among university students in border regions.
Funding
University Student Research Fund Project of Dali University in 2024
(KYSX2024040).
NOTES
*These authors contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.
#Corresponding author.