Sociodemographic and Diagnostic Aspects of Esophageal Disease in Ouagadougou ()
1. Introduction
Esophageal pathologies make up a significant portion of digestive disorders observed in clinical practice. Their diagnosis relies primarily on upper digestive endoscopy. Access to endoscopic examinations remains limited in many African countries due to insufficient availability of equipment, the high cost of procedures, and the lack of specialized personnel [1].
In sub-Saharan Africa, most published studies have focused mainly on esophageal cancer or complications of portal hypertension, leaving little recent data on the spectrum of esophageal lesions [2] [3]. In an urban context undergoing nutritional transition, it is likely that benign conditions related to reflux are becoming more common. This increase is explained by the rapid change in dietary habits, characterized by a growing consumption of foods high in fats, sugars, and ultra-processed products. The progressive sedentary lifestyle, linked to urbanization and changes in living habits, also contributes to the increase in overweight and abdominal obesity, which are promoting factors for gastroesophageal reflux. Furthermore, sugary and carbonated drinks, widely available in urban areas, encourage the relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and increase the frequency of reflux episodes. These dietary and behavioral changes are often accompanied by a reduction in physical activity and a more stressful pace of life, which can exacerbate functional esophageal symptoms. The aim of our study was to examine the sociodemographic and diagnostic profiles of esophageal pathology in Ouagadougou.
2. Materials and Methods
This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection in the digestive endoscopy units of the Yalgado Ouédraogo University Hospital, Tengandogo University Hospital, and Sandof Polyclinic. It involved patients who underwent digestive endoscopy over a 5-year period, from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2024. Data were collected from upper digestive endoscopy reports and histology results. Patients of all ages, both sexes, and all socio-professional categories who had an esophageal lesion on upper endoscopy with a report that could be analyzed were included. Information was collected using a survey form. The analysis of factors associated with esophageal pathologies was carried out in two stages. First, a bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the association between each explanatory variable and the presence of an esophageal pathology. In a second step, a multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with esophageal disorders. The logistic model allowed for the estimation of adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The dependent variable was the presence of an esophageal disorder. The independent variables included in the model notably included age and sex. Patient anonymity and data confidentiality were maintained. Authorization for data collection was obtained from the management of the aforementioned centers.
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics
A total of 4216 patients were included. The population was predominantly female (2138 women, 50.7%). The sex ratio was 0.97. The mean age of the patients was 43.7 ± 16.5 years, ranging from 1 to 92 years. Young adults accounted for 60.9% of cases (Table 1).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients.
Variables |
n (%) |
Number of patients |
4216 (100%) |
Gender |
Mens: 2078 (49.3%) |
Womens: 2138 (50.7%) |
Average age |
43.7 ± 16.5 years old |
Age range |
≤16 years: 131 (3.1%) |
[17 - 50 years[: 2567 (60.9%) |
≥50 years: 1518 (36%) |
Age groups and gender |
≤16 years |
Mens: 65 (1.5%) |
Womens: 66 (1.6%) |
[17 - 50 years[ |
Mens: 1267 (30.1%) |
Womens: 1300 (30.8%) |
≥50 years |
Mens: 746 (17.7%) |
Womens: 772 (18.3%) |
3.2. Diagnostic Aspects
3.2.1. Clinical Aspects
The indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were numerous and varied (Table 2). The main ones were epigastric pain (47.4%), regurgitation (14.4%), and heartburn (13.9%).
Table 2. Distribution according to the indication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Indications for upper GI endoscopy |
Headcount |
Percentage |
Epigastralgia |
1998 |
47.4 |
Regurgitation |
606 |
14.4 |
Pyrosis |
585 |
13.9 |
Dyspepsia |
427 |
10.1 |
Retrosternal chest pain |
391 |
9.3 |
Abdominal pain |
254 |
6 |
Vomiting |
220 |
5.2 |
Dysphagia |
175 |
4.1 |
Haematemesis |
126 |
3 |
Eructations |
148 |
3.5 |
Search for signs of hypertension |
112 |
2.7 |
Melena |
77 |
1.8 |
Odynophagia |
65 |
1.5 |
Halitosis |
55 |
1.3 |
Precordialgia |
45 |
1.1 |
Ingestion of caustic |
37 |
0.9 |
Hypersialorrhoea |
34 |
0.8 |
Palpitation |
32 |
0.8 |
Altered general condition |
30 |
0.7 |
Mucocutaneous pallor |
30 |
0.7 |
Anorexia |
27 |
0.6 |
Choking |
21 |
0.5 |
Weight loss |
14 |
0.3 |
Dyspnoea |
11 |
0.3 |
Unexplained chronic cough |
10 |
0.2 |
Ingestion of foreign body |
8 |
0.2 |
Hepatomegaly |
2 |
0.05 |
Splenomegaly |
2 |
0.05 |
Other* |
81 |
2.2 |
*: canker sores, pre-therapeutic assessment, oropharyngeal candidiasis, dysphonia, occasional aspiration, epigastric mass, intra-abdominal mass, jaundice, rumination, post-polypectomy monitoring, sensation of a lump in the esophagus, sensation of a foreign body in the esophagus, stricture syndrome, chronic laryngitis, asthenia, edema-ascitic syndrome.
3.2.2. Endoscopic Aspects
During endoscopy, hiatal hernias were mainly observed in 60.6% of cases and peptic esophagitis in 52.6% (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Distribution of patients according to endoscopic lesions found.
• Histology
Squamous cell carcinoma (58%) and adenocarcinoma (42%) were the most common histological types of esophageal cancer.
• Distribution of esophageal pathologies by age group
Peptic esophagitis predominated in children and young adults, accounting for 71.7% and 58.2% of cases, respectively. In individuals over 50, hiatal hernia was more common (66.6%). The proportion of esophageal tumors increased with age. It was observed in 1.3% of the elderly and 0.2% of young adults, and was not found in children (Table 3).
Table 3. Distribution of major pathologies and esophageal cancer by age group.
Age range |
Peptic oesophagitis (%) |
Hiatal hernia n (%) |
Oesophageal cancer n (%) |
≤16 years |
94 (71.8%) |
54 (41.2%) |
0 (0%) |
[17 - 50 years[ |
1496 (58.2%) |
1491(58%) |
6 (0.2%) |
≥50 years |
627 (41.3%) |
1011 (66.6%) |
20 (1.3%) |
Multivariate Analysis
There was a statistically significant association for all three pathologies with age and one with sex for peptic esophagitis and esophageal cancer. Men were 2.93 times more likely to develop cancer than women (Table 4).
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of sociodemographic factors associated with the main esophageal pathologies and esophageal cancer.
Esophageal pathology |
Factor |
Adjusted Odds Ratio |
Confidence interval (95%) |
p-value |
Peptic oesophagitis |
Gender (Women vs Mens) |
1.18 |
1.04 -1.34 |
0.01 |
[17 - 50 years[ vs ≤16 years |
0.72 |
0.5 – 0.94 |
0.015 |
≥50 years vs ≤16 years |
0.45 |
0.34 – 0.6 |
<0.001 |
Hiatal hernia |
Gender (Women vs Mens) |
0.92 |
0.82 -1.03 |
0.15 |
[17 - 50 years[ vs ≤16 years |
1.78 |
1.26 – 2.51 |
0.001 |
≥50 years vs ≤16 years |
2.51 |
1.77 - 3.56 |
<0.001 |
Oesophageal cancer |
Gender (Women vs Mens) |
2.93 |
1.15 - 7.45 |
0.027 |
[17 - 50 years[ vs ≤16 years |
1 |
0.12 - 8 |
1 |
≥50 years vs ≤16 years |
12.3 |
1.5 - 102 |
0.02 |
4. Discussion
4.1. Study Limitations
This study, being retrospective in nature, is based on the analysis of hospital records, which may lead to missing data or selection biases. Furthermore, conducted in a university hospital, it reflects the hospitalized population rather than the general population, limiting the generalizability of the results. Despite these constraints, it provides useful insights into local trends and can guide future prospective studies.
4.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics
Esophageal pathology, excluding cancer, mainly affects young adults and women, as found in several studies [4] [5]. In our study, peptic esophagitis and hiatal hernia were the most common esophageal pathologies, while esophageal cancers were rare. These results are consistent with previous studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, which report a low incidence of esophageal cancer, particularly. adenocarcinoma, compared to other regions of the world [6].
4.3. Diagnostic Aspects
Regarding peptic esophagitis, the risk decreased with age and it seemed more common in women (OR = 1.18; p = 0.01) and children. As for hiatal hernia, the risk increased significantly with age, reaching a peak in those aged 50 and over (OR = 2.51; p <0.001). These results are consistent with international epidemiological data showing that aging of the diaphragm muscles and loosening of muscle fibers increase the risk of hiatal hernia [7] [8]. Malignant tumors of the esophagus were rare in our series, but the risk increased sharply from age 50 (OR = 12.3; p = 0.020). They were more common in men (OR = 0.35; p = 0.046). These observations are consistent with global data showing that esophageal cancers mainly occur in older men [9]. Other African authors have emphasized the rarity of this cancer in our context [10]-[12]. Behavioral factors such as tobacco, alcohol, and the consumption of very hot foods, documented in Burkina Faso and other sub-Saharan countries, may contribute to these differences in distribution by sex and age [8].
5. Conclusion
In our study, peptic esophagitis and hiatal hernia are the most common esophageal pathologies, mainly affecting young adults and more often women. In contrast, esophageal cancer remains rare, but its incidence increases significantly from the age of 50, which confirms the need for more targeted screening and management in this age group. This approach, focused on high-risk individuals, allows for early detection and optimal use of resources, particularly suitable for the African context. These results highlight the importance of early diagnosis of reflux and the prevention of esophageal complications in our context.