Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices regarding Malaria Prevention among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Consultations at the Hospital De L’Amitié Sino-Gabonese in Franceville, Gabon ()
1. Introduction
Plasmodium infection is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in endemic areas, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa [1]. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 95% of malaria deaths worldwide occur in Africa, mainly affecting children under 5 and pregnant women, who are particularly vulnerable physiologically [1]. For pregnant women, malaria can lead to serious complications such as maternal anaemia, foetal growth restriction, low birth weight, premature births, and even maternal or neonatal deaths [2].
In light of these dangers, the WHO recommends preventive strategies such as intermittent preventive administration of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP), the use of Long-Lasting Insecticide-treated mosquito Nets (LLINs), and prompt treatment of febrile episodes [3]. However, the effectiveness of these strategies depends on their acceptance and adoption by pregnant women. Knowledge, perception of risk, and adherence by pregnant women are key factors in the effectiveness of these interventions.
Gabon is located in a hyperendemic malaria transmission zone with a slight increase during the rainy season [4]. Malaria prevalence initially fell from 31.2% to 18.3% between 2005 and 2008, then rose in 2011, with rates of 24.1% in Libreville, 6.5% in Port-Gentil, and 44.2% in Oyem [5] and Franceville in the province of Haut-Ogooué, where the overall prevalence of infection was 26.1% between 2017 and 2019 [4].
As in any malaria-endemic area, pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria. The application of intermittent preventive treatment with SP recommendations has led to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of malaria cases among pregnant women [6]. Later, it was shown that the prevalence of malaria in Libreville was 34.4%, 53.6%, and 18.2% in maternal peripheral blood, the placenta, and the umbilical cord, respectively [7]. There was considerable variation in compliance with preventive measures such as taking Intermittent Preventive Treatment with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine (IPT-SP) and using LLIN between women. This non-compliance was often attributed to a lack of knowledge or awareness among patients. The objective of this study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pregnant women regarding malaria prevention at the Hospital de l’Amitié Sino-Gabonese in Franceville, Gabon.
2. Patients and Methods
2.1. Type and Period of Study
An observational, cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was conducted between June 23rd and August 14th, 2025.
2.2. Study Population and Location
The population involved in this study was pregnant women who attended antenatal consultations (CPN) at the maternity ward of the Hospital de l’Amitié Sino-Gabonese (HASG) located in the 2nd borough of Franceville city, the provincial capital of the Haut-Ogooué province in Gabon. The prenatal consultation service at the HASG maternity ward provides medical and educational care for women throughout their pregnancy and postpartum period. Only pregnant women who gave consent and agreed to participate were included. Women who came only to declare their pregnancy without effective follow-up were not included in the study.
2.3. Sample Size
A non-probability sampling method was used to select pregnant women. Due to time and funding constraints, and to ensure better patient accessibility, all pregnant women attending prenatal consultations during the study period were interviewed. The sample size was not calculated.
2.4. Operational Definitions
Knowledge: level of information about malaria and its consequences.
Attitudes: perception of risk and motivation.
Practices: actual behaviors (use of impregnated mosquito nets, taking SP).
Gravidity: number of pregnancies.
Parity: number of live births.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices were measured with open (Example: What is malaria? During which period of pregnancy can SP be administered?...) and closed (Example: Are you aware of malaria prevention methods? Do you follow the dosage recommended in the prevention protocol?) questions in sections 4 and 5 of the questionnaire.
2.5. Study Procedure
A standardized questionnaire was designed for data collection by the Chronic Disease Epidemiology Research Unit, Environmental Health of the Department of Community and Social Medicine at the University of Health Sciences in Libreville. This questionnaire consisted of five (5) sections. The first section concerned the socio-demographic characteristics of the patients. The questions focused on age, place of residence, educational level, marital status, and occupation. The second part concerned the medical characteristics of the women. The questions focused on the women’s obstetric history and prenatal care. The third part concerned knowledge and questions focused on the definition of malaria, its mode of transmission, clinical signs, and consequences for pregnancy. The fourth part concerned attitudes and questions focused on women’s perceptions of recommendations, the severity of malaria, and the usefulness of preventive measures. Finally, the last part concerned practical, and the questions focused on actual behaviours, such as taking SP (IPT-SP) and using impregnated mosquito nets.
On the day of the appointment, explanations of the objectives and conduct of the study were provided to all patients in order to obtain their consent. Once consent was obtained, data were collected during a face-to-face interview. Patient data were collected on the days of antenatal consultation.
2.6. Data Management and Statistical Analysis
All data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using STATA 14 software. Qualitative characteristics were described in terms of frequency (percentage) and quantitative characteristics in terms of mean (± standard deviation) and extreme values. The age variable was transformed into a binary categorical variable (age ≤ mean and age > mean). Comparison of proportions was performed using Pearson’s chi-2 test. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-2 test was used to investigate the association between general knowledge of malaria and socio-demographic characteristics, estimating the Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval. The significance threshold for all analyses was 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Patients
A total of 155 pregnant women were included. The average age was 27.9 ± 6.6 years. The proportion of women aged 29 or younger (≤29 years) was 52.9% (n = 82). More than half of the patients had a secondary education level, i.e., 63.9% (n = 99), and 60.6% (n = 94) lived with a partner. Pupils/students and women in employment accounted for 37.4% (n = 58) and 36.8% (n = 57) of the sample (Table 1).
3.2. Obstetric Characteristics and Prenatal Care of Patients
In this study, the proportion of primigravidas was 35.5% (n = 55), that of multigravidas was 41.3% (n = 64), and that of multiparas was 32.9% (n = 51). Women between 1 and 3 antenatal care visits accounted for 67.1% (n = 104) of the sample. Most of the women included were in the second trimester (16 - 28 WA) and accounted for 40.0% (n = 62) of the sample (Table 2).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women.
Characteristics |
Number |
Percentage |
Age group (years) |
|
|
≤28 |
82 |
52.9 |
>28 |
73 |
47.1 |
Education Level |
|
|
Primary |
17 |
10.9 |
Secondary |
99 |
63.9 |
Higher |
39 |
25.2 |
Marital status |
|
|
In a relationship |
94 |
60.6 |
Single |
61 |
39.4 |
Occupation |
|
|
Pupils/students |
58 |
37.4 |
None |
40 |
25.8 |
With a profession |
57 |
36.8 |
Table 2. Description of the obstetric characteristics of the pregnant women.
Characteristics |
Number |
Proportion (%) |
Gestation |
Primigravida |
55 |
35.5 |
Low parity |
64 |
41.3 |
Multigesture |
36 |
23.2 |
Parity |
Nulliparous |
46 |
29.7 |
Primiparous |
41 |
26.5 |
Paucipara |
51 |
32.9 |
Multipara |
17 |
10.9 |
Number of antenatal care visits |
1 - 3 |
104 |
67.1 |
4 - 6 |
34 |
21.9 |
≥7 |
05 |
3.2 |
Undetermined |
12 |
07.8 |
Age of pregnancy (WA) |
1 - 15 |
39 |
25.2 |
16 - 28 |
62 |
40.0 |
29 - 41 |
36 |
23.2 |
Undetermined |
18 |
11.6 |
Total |
155 |
100.0 |
WA: Week Amenorrhea.
3.3. Description of General Knowledge about Malaria
Figure 1 shows that the media (67.7%) and health personnel (52.3%) were the main sources of information on malaria for the study population. Table 3 describes the general knowledge of malaria gathered from the pregnant women surveyed. Only 38.1% (n = 59) of women claimed to know the definition of malaria. Among them, 59.3% (n = 35) defined malaria as a “disease caused by mosquitoes”.
As for the mode of transmission, most patients, 68.4% (n = 106), stated that they knew how malaria was transmitted, and among them, 93.4% (n = 99) stated that the disease was transmitted by “mosquito bites”.
Regarding clinical signs of disease, more than 75% (n = 118) of participants reported knowing the clinical manifestations of malaria; fever was the most widely known symptom of malaria (84.7%) (Figure 2).
Finally, 62.6% (n = 97) of participants stated that they had knowledge of the consequences of malaria during pregnancy. Miscarriage was the most frequently described consequence of malaria during pregnancy, at 81.4% (n = 79).
Figure 1. Participants’ main sources of information on malaria.
Table 3. Description of general knowledge (definition, transmission routes, and symptoms) of malaria.
Questions |
Number |
Proportion (%) |
Do you know the definition of malaria? |
Yes |
59 |
38.1 |
No |
96 |
61.9 |
If yes, what is malaria? |
An infectious disease transmitted by mosquito bites |
06 |
10.2 |
A parasitic disease transmitted by the bite of female Anopheles mosquitoes |
03 |
5.1 |
Disease caused by the mosquito |
35 |
59.3 |
Dangerous disease. |
15 |
25.4 |
Do you know how malaria is transmitted? |
Yes |
106 |
68.4 |
No |
49 |
31.6 |
If so, which ones? |
Mosquito bite |
99 |
93.4 |
Female Anopheles mosquito bite |
06 |
5.7 |
Transmission from mother to child |
01 |
0.9 |
Are you familiar with the symptoms of malaria? |
Yes |
118 |
76.1 |
No |
37 |
23.9 |
Are you aware of the consequences of malaria during pregnancy? |
Yes |
97 |
62.6 |
No |
58 |
37.4 |
If yes, what are the complications? |
Miscarriage |
79 |
81.4 |
Abortion |
12 |
12.3 |
Premature birth |
02 |
2.1 |
Child ill at birth |
02 |
2.1 |
Low birth weight |
02 |
2.1 |
Figure 2. Knowledge of malaria symptoms among women who reported having knowledge of malaria symptoms.
3.4. General Knowledge of Malaria According to Socio-Demographic and Obstetric Parameters
Analysis of the results summarized in Table 4 and Table 5 shows that general knowledge of malaria in terms of its definition, mode of transmission, clinical manifestations, and consequences for pregnancy differed significantly between educational levels (p < 0.05) (Table 4). Knowledge of the consequences of malaria on pregnancy differed significantly between age groups (p = 0.007). A statistical association was observed between knowledge of the consequences of malaria on pregnancy and women aged > 28 years (OR95% = 2.5 [1.3 - 5.0], p = 0.007). No difference was observed between general knowledge of malaria and obstetric characteristics, particularly gestation and parity.
Table 4. Distribution of general knowledge about malaria according to socio-demographic characteristics.
|
Knowledge about malaria |
Characteristics |
Definition |
Modes of transmission |
Symptoms |
*Consequences |
|
Yes |
No |
p |
Yes |
No |
p |
Yes |
No |
p |
Yes |
No |
p |
Age group (years) |
≤28 |
25 (42.4) |
52 (54.2) |
0.15 |
47 (44.4) |
30 (61.2) |
0.05 |
58 (49.2) |
19 (51.4) |
0.81 |
40 (41.2) |
37 (63.8) |
0.007 |
>28 |
34 (57.6) |
44 (45.8) |
59 (55.7) |
19 (38.8) |
60 (50.8) |
18 (48.6) |
57 (58.8) |
21 (36.2) |
Education level |
Primary |
04 (6.8) |
13 (13.5) |
0.02 |
08 (7.6) |
09 (18.4) |
0.001 |
08 (6.8) |
09 (24.3) |
0.001 |
09 (9.3) |
08 (13.8) |
0.04 |
Secondary |
33 (55.9) |
66 (68.8) |
61 (57.5) |
38 (77.5) |
72 (61.0) |
27 (73.0) |
57 (58.8) |
42 (72.4) |
Higher |
22 (37.3) |
17 (17.7) |
37 (34.9 |
02 (4.1) |
38 (32.2) |
01 (2.7) |
31 (31.9) |
08 (13.8) |
*Consequences of pregnancy.
Table 5. Relationship between general knowledge about malaria and socio-demographic characteristics.
|
Knowledge about malaria |
Characteristics |
Definition |
Modes of transmission |
Symptoms |
*Consequences |
|
OR [95% CI] |
p |
OR [95% CI] |
p |
OR [95% CI] |
p |
OR [95% CI] |
p |
Education level |
Primary |
1 |
0.02 |
1 |
0.0001 |
1 |
0.001 |
1 |
0.04 |
Secondary |
1.62 [0.5 - 5.4] |
1.8 [0.6 - 5.1] |
3.0 [1.02 - 8.7] |
1.2 [0.4 - 3.4] |
Higher |
4.2 [1.1 - 16.4] |
20.8 [2.6 - 165.6] |
42.7 [2.6 - 696.2] |
3.4 [0.9 - 12.4] |
3.5. Knowledge of Malaria Prevention Measures
The description of patients’ knowledge of malaria prevention measures in Table 6 showed that most women (92.6%, n = 128) reported having knowledge of malaria prevention methods. All women (100%) who reported having knowledge of malaria prevention methods described the use of mosquito nets (sleeping under a mosquito net), the use of insecticide, and environmental sanitation as methods of preventing malaria (Figure 3).
The majority of participants, 94.2% (n = 146), stated that a Long-Lasting Insecticide-treated mosquito Net (LLIN) could be used during all seasons. However, 52.2% (n = 81) of women were unaware that LLINs were provided free of charge to pregnant women during antenatal consultations.
More than half, 62.6% (n = 97) of patients stated that IPT-SP could be administered during the first trimester of pregnancy, and 58.7% (n = 91) of women surveyed stated that SP could be administered until delivery. In addition, 43.9% (n = 68) of women did not know the minimum number of SP doses during pregnancy, and 29.7% of participants stated that the minimum number of SP doses during pregnancy was between 3 and 5. For 34.2% (n = 53) of women, the minimum interval between two doses of SP was one month, and 41.9% of women did not know the minimum interval between doses of SP. Finally, 57.4% (n = 89) of patients stated that the number of tablets per dose of SP was 3 tablets, while 31.0% (n = 48) stated that they did not know.
Table 6. Description of knowledge of malaria prevention measures
Questions |
Number |
Proportion (%) |
Are you aware of malaria prevention methods? |
Yes |
128 |
92.6 |
No |
27 |
17.4 |
When is the recommended time of year for pregnant women to use LLIN? |
During the rainy season |
03 |
01.9 |
All seasons |
146 |
94.2 |
Don’t know |
06 |
03.9 |
Is LLIN free for pregnant women during antenatal care? |
Yes |
66 |
42.6 |
No |
81 |
52.2 |
Undetermined |
08 |
05.2 |
Questions |
Number |
Proportion |
During which period of pregnancy can SP be administered? |
1st trimester |
97 |
62.6 |
2nd trimester |
17 |
10.9 |
3rd trimester |
01 |
0.6 |
Can IPT-SP be administered until delivery? |
Yes |
91 |
58.7 |
No |
35 |
22.6 |
Don’t know |
29 |
18.7 |
What is the minimum number of doses of IPT-SP during pregnancy? |
<3 |
21 |
13.5 |
3 - 5 |
46 |
29.7 |
>5 |
20 |
12.9 |
Don’t know |
68 |
43.9 |
What is the minimum interval between doses of IPT-SP? |
1 month |
53 |
34.2 |
More than one month |
37 |
23.9 |
Don’t know |
65 |
41.9 |
How many SP tablets are administered per dose? |
<3 |
17 |
11.0 |
3 |
89 |
57.4 |
>3 |
01 |
0.6 |
Don’t know |
48 |
31.0 |
![]()
Figure 3. Description of malaria prevention methods among women who claim to have knowledge of malaria prevention methods.
3.6. Attitudes and Practices Regarding Compliance with IPT-SP and the Use of Mosquito Nets as Preventive Treatment during Pregnancy
Table 7 reports the attitudes and practices of the pregnant women surveyed regarding IPT-SP and the use of mosquito nets. It shows that 54.8% (n = 85) of women reported taking IPT-SP during pregnancy. Furthermore, 52.3% (n = 81) of these women reported not having followed the dosage recommended in the prevention protocol, and 95.9% (n = 71) of women who reported following the IPT-SP dosage said they had taken one tablet per dose of IPT-SP.
Regarding mosquito net use, 49.7% (n = 77) reported not sleeping under a mosquito net. Not receiving a mosquito net (41.4%) and discomfort (32.2%) were the main reasons given for not using a mosquito net.
Table 7. Attitudes and practices regarding IPT-SP during pregnancy.
Questions |
Number |
Proportion (%) |
Did you have to take IPT-SP prophylaxis during this pregnancy? |
Yes |
85 |
54.8 |
No |
56 |
36.1 |
Don’t know |
14 |
09.03 |
Do you follow the dosage recommended in the prevention protocol? |
Yes |
74 |
47.7 |
No |
81 |
52.3 |
If yes, number of tablets per dose? |
1 tablet per dose |
71 |
95.9 |
2 tablets per dose |
01 |
1.4 |
3 tablets per dose |
02 |
2.7 |
Do you sleep under a mosquito net? |
Yes |
68 |
43.9 |
No |
77 |
49.7 |
Sometimes |
10 |
06.4 |
If no/sometimes, what are the reasons? |
|
% |
I have not yet received a mosquito net. |
36 |
41.4 |
It suffocates me; I don’t like it. |
28 |
32.2 |
His lover doesn’t like it. |
07 |
08 |
Allergy to substances on mosquito net. |
02 |
02.3 |
Not impregnated. |
12 |
13.8 |
Other reasons. |
02 |
02.3 |
4. Discussion
This cross-sectional study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pregnant women in relation to malaria prevention at the Hospital de l’Amitié Sino-Gabonese in Franceville, Gabon. The average age of the women was 27.9 ± 6.6 years, reflecting a relatively young population, as the majority were under 28 years of age. These results were similar to observations made in Bamenda, Cameroon, where most pregnant women were between 15 and 30 years of age [8].
More than half (61.0%) of the participants had not reached the quota of Antenatal Consultations (ANC) recommended by the WHO (four ANC). This result could be justified by the fact that most women were in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. However, there was still a proportion of women whose number of ANCs was undetermined. This result could reflect either a deliberate desire not to admit to not having had prenatal consultations or the subjective nature of the collection of this information, as the number of prenatal consultations is often recorded in the pregnancy follow-up booklet or the late start of ANCs. This finding was also reported in a Malian study in 2022, where 46% of women had started antenatal care in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy [9]. The results obtained could also illustrate the limitations encountered in the antenatal care of pregnant women, the effectiveness of health education, and access to preventive measures, as noted in other African contexts [10] [11].
Analysis of general knowledge about malaria showed that the media (67.7%) and health professionals (52.3%) were the main sources of information for women. These results differed from those reported in Cameroon, where health professionals were the main source of information on IPT-SP for pregnant women (91.8%) [12]. Although the media are an effective tool for raising awareness, their impact remains limited when it comes to conveying specific technical knowledge, such as the IPT-SP protocol. This situation remains a cause for concern, as several studies have shown that education provided by healthcare professionals is more effective in strengthening adherence to preventive practices [13] [14]. The secondary role of healthcare personnel in Franceville thus appears to be a major obstacle to a thorough understanding of malaria and the effective implementation of preventive recommendations. This study showed that, although slightly more than one-third (38.1%) and 68.4% of pregnant women reported knowing the definition and mode of transmission of malaria, some of this knowledge was incomplete or even incorrect. This result could reflect a marked deficit in understanding of this disease. Conversely, in Bamenda, Cameroon, 64% of women had a general knowledge of malaria that was considered adequate [10] [11].
In terms of clinical signs, fever was the symptom most frequently cited by women. These results further confirm that fever is the most commonly observed clinical sign during malaria episodes [15] [16].
Awareness of the effects of malaria on pregnancy and its impact on malaria risk remains limited. These observations were comparable to those of previous Gabonese studies conducted in the south and southeast [15] [17].
The study highlighted a relationship between educational level and knowledge about malaria. Thus, having a high level of education increases the chances of having knowledge about malaria (OR > 1; P < 0.05). These results were comparable to those obtained in Tanzania and Gabon [17] [18], suggesting that formal education is a key lever for improving knowledge and perception of malaria risk.
This study found that almost all (92.6%) women were aware of malaria prevention methods. However, more than half of the women were unaware that a mosquito net was free for pregnant women. It was also found that the use of mosquito nets (sleeping under a mosquito net) was still low despite their availability, which could reflect a relaxation of public health measures by the National Malaria Control Programme. These results were similar to those in Burkina Faso [19]. The data also showed that even though mosquito nets are free, they are underused due to a lack of distribution and discomfort.
Analysis of attitudes and practices revealed that, in terms of malaria chemoprophylaxis, more than half of the women had adhered to IPT-SP. However, there appears to be confusion about the IPT-SP administration protocol, which seems to be poorly understood and poorly applied. Very few women knew when to start IPT-SP, the recommended number of doses, or the number of tablets per dose. The irregularity of women’s attendance at consultations could explain this result, as described in the 2018 study by Tshibola Mbuyi [20].
Some limitations were observed in the study. The sample size was not large enough for an overall assessment of knowledge. Furthermore, limiting inclusion to women attending prenatal consultations restricts the extrapolation of knowledge to all pregnant women in Franceville.
5. Conclusion
Malaria remains a public health problem and is one of the main reasons for seeking medical advice. This study showed a notable disparity between the availability of prevention tools (mosquito nets, IPT-SP) and their effective use, which is linked to a lack of knowledge about malaria prevention, non-compliance with the dosage of IPT-SP, non-reception of mosquito nets, and discomfort with using them. Adherence to prenatal consultations and improved education of women by health professionals could be major determinants of better adherence to preventive measures.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to:
The HASG management has given its approval for this work to be carried out within the laboratory.
The midwives at the hospital’s maternity ward facilitate access to patients.
The patients who agreed to participate in this study.
Authors’ Contributions
M. N. S., E. M. J. M. and I. E. participated in the design of the project, statistical analysis of the data, and writing of the article. A. O. A. participated in data collection and management. L. W. B. J. participated in the implementation of the study and writing of the article. P. M. I. participated in the proofreading of the article, and E. B. N. and J. B. L. D. participated in the design and management of the project and the proofreading of the article.
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations
This study was approved by the steering committee of the HASG of Franceville. An informed consent form and an information leaflet were provided to each participating subject. The confidentiality and anonymity of the information were maintained during data collection and data analysis. Medical confidentiality was also guaranteed.