Determinants of the Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) Availability and Degradation in the South-Central Sahelian Area of Niger ()
1. Introduction
Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are an essential resource for rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa, providing food, traditional medicines, and vital income (Faye et al., 2023; Shackleton & Pandey, 2014; Shackleton et al., 2011). Beyond domestic needs, they contribute to ecosystem regulation and community resilience in the face of environmental disturbances (UICN & AGEREF-CL, 2024; Moussa et al., 2023). However, their availability is declining due to overexploitation, population growth, and climate change (FAO, 2019; Fandohan et al., 2020). In Niger, particularly in the Sahelian areas, NTFPs are a strategic component of livelihoods, where agriculture and livestock farming are highly exposed to climate hazards (Boubacar et al., 2022). Despite their vital role, few studies have simultaneously explored the factors determining their availability and those responsible for their degradation using an integrated quantitative approach. Understanding these dynamics is crucial in guiding sustainable management strategies that are tailored to the community’s needs and the preservation of ecosystems. This study adopts a dual econometric approach, including a linear regression in order to identify the variables that influence the NTFPs availability and a logit model to analyze their degradation determinants. Therefore, it aims to provide sound scientific information to support the conservation and sustainable use of these vital natural resources in the Sahelian areas. Specifically, it is to characterize the main factors that determine the availability of NTFPs and to identify the variables explaining their degradation. Hypotheses are that availability depends on socio-economic and environmental factors, while degradation is influenced by the intensity of exploitation, demographic pressure, and climate change.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Presentation of the Study Area
The study was conducted in two agroclimatic areas following a north-south rainfall gradient in the Maradi region, located in the south-central part of Niger Republic, at approximately 13.5˚ of North latitude and 7.1˚ of East longitude (Haweÿ et al., 2020), namely the northern and the southern Sahelian areas, as illustrated in , which shows the location of the selected villages within the study area. The southern Sahelian area is characterized by a semi-arid climate, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to 700 mm (Katkoré et al., 2021). In the southern Sahelian area, vegetation is denser with a tree and shrub layer and predominantly sandy-loamy soils with good water retention capacity (WAEN, 2020). The northern Sahelian area is the driest part of the Maradi region, marking a transition to the Sahara. The climate is semi-arid to arid type, with an annual rainfall ranging from 300 to 400 mm (Soumana, 2021). The northern Sahelian area vegetation is made mainly of shrub and tree steppes, with relatively sparse vegetation cover. Soils are mainly sandy to loamy, with low water retention capacity (WAEN, 2020). The selected villages are presented according to their agroclimatic location, as shown in .
![]()
Figure 1. Selected villages’ location in the study area.
Table 1. Villages of the study area.
Areas |
Northern Sahel |
Southern Sahel |
Villages |
Kamoune, Dargaza, Dan Jirgaou, Maiguizawa, Oubandawaki, Ourafane,
Kankalerou, Magaria, and Take-Take |
Guidan Dodo, Guidan Yaro, Oumarawa, Afaram, Guertaou, Boukouzawa Magaji, Rafa, Rouga Bodé, Guidan Tanko, and Sajé Manja |
These villages were chosen based on their climatic differences, their proximity to the defined land use units, and their accessibility.
2.2. Sampling and Data Collection
A pre-survey was done by contacting local stakeholders in order to get household data by terroir. A sample was then determined using the following formula (Daniel, 2011):
where: n = sample size; t = confidence level; N = parent population; the estimated proportion of farmers using NTFPs as resources; with a margin of error of 5%.
The sample is then of 379 households heads old of at least 18 years. A two-stage stratified sampling was used to ensure adequate household representation. Villages were stratified by ecological proximity (land-use types and agroecological conditions) and sociolinguistic criteria to capture key differences in resource availability and harvesting practices. This approach allows the study to account for relevant population heterogeneity and enables meaningful comparisons between similar villages.Data collected from households heads included socio-economic characteristics, the fields size, and others information on NTFPs, such as the number of species collected, quantities harvested, collection location and distance, perceptions of climate change, pest attacks and excessive logging practices, as well as the degradation or disappearance level of NTFPs, measured by the binary variable “disappeared.” All information was collected via a questionnaire integrated into the KoBoCollect application (version 1.29.3) and checked to eliminate inconsistencies and missing values before statistical analysis.
2.3. Data Analysis
Household survey data collected with KoboCollect were processed and analyzed in Stata 16.0 software. Descriptive statistics were first computed, including species citation frequencies to identify the most important woody resources across the study area. To assess the determinants of NTFP availability, a linear regression model was estimated, linking household socio-economic characteristics, farm characteristics, and NTFP-related practices to the total annual quantity of NTFPs harvested per household.
Each variable included in the model was selected based on its theoretical potential to influence NTFP availability and harvesting. Household socio-economic characteristics reflect harvesting capacity, farm characteristics capture access to resources, and NTFP-related practices (number of species collected, collection distance, pest attacks, excessive logging, and climate perceptions) measure harvesting intensity and environmental and contextual factors.
The variable “perception of climate change” was included because farmers’ perceptions influence adaptive behaviors, such as selective harvesting or tree conservation, even in the absence of objective meteorological data (Dembélé et al., 2024).
The dependent variable being continuous, the ordinary least squares (OLS) method was chosen, as it provides unbiased and efficient estimators under classical assumptions (Greene, 2018). Statistical assumptions were tested: residual normality was assessed, and due to observed deviations, the dependent variable was log-transformed; homoscedasticity was examined using the Breusch-Pagan test and corrected via robust standard errors with the White test; model specification was validated (_hatsq p-value > 0.005); finally, no multicollinearity issues were detected (VIF < 10).
Such models are commonly used to explain household-level variation in NTFP collection (Babulo et al., 2009; Heubach et al., 2011). The model was specified as follows:
where
represents the total quantity of NTFPs collected per household per year and ϵ the error term.
In the degradation analysis, a binary logit model was applied to estimate the probability of a species being reported as extinct (1 = extinct, 0 = available), using the same explanatory variables. Marginal effects were calculated to ease interpretation. Similar Logit applications have been used to assess forest resource degradation and household harvesting pressures in West African and Sahelian contexts (Pouliot et al., 2012; Shackleton et al., 2001; Vedeld et al., 2004). These approaches provide robust insights into both the availability and the risk of disappearance of NTFPs in the study area. The Logit equation model was as follows:
Indeed, although the pseudo R2 of the logit model is relatively low (0.0592), which is common in the analysis of complex phenomena, the prediction test shows that the model correctly classified 69.68% of the observations. This confirms that the model retains an acceptable explanatory power and provides relevant insights into NTFP degradation.
2.4. Conceptual Diagram
As shown in , the conceptual diagram illustrates the relationships between household characteristics (sex, education level, household size, field size), the availability and degradation of non-timber forest products (NTFPs), and the main influencing factors (quantity of NTFPs collected per household per year, species disappearance, number of species exploited, collection distance, agro-climatic area, climate change, pest attacks, overlogging, and food insecurity.
Figure 2. Conceptual diagram.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Results
3.1.1. Socio-Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Households
lists the socio-economic characteristics of the households surveyed in the northern and southern Sahelian areas of the Maradi region. The majority of household heads are male gender (67.39%). The average age of household heads is approximately 41.8 years, and the mean household size is 9.91 persons, indicating large households with a substantial family labor force.
Table 2. Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of households.
Variables |
Modalities |
North Sahel
(n = 222) |
South Sahel
(n = 156) |
Total
(n = 379) |
Gender of household head (%) |
Female Male |
35.91 64.09 |
31.30 68.70 |
32.61 67.39 |
Age of household head (years) |
Average |
41.65 ±13.15 |
42.34 ± 13.86 |
41.8 ± 13.5 |
Education level (%) |
Formal
Education |
79.73 |
89.74 |
84.01 |
Non-Formal
Education |
20.27 |
10.26 |
15.99 |
Ethnicity (%) |
Haoussa |
80.11 |
95.22 |
90.95 |
Peulh |
12.71 |
1.30 |
4.52 |
Touareg |
7.18 |
2.17 |
3.59 |
Kanouri |
- |
1.30 |
0.94 |
Average household size (persons) |
Average |
9.81 ± 5.74 |
10.04 ± 5.57 |
9.91 ± 5.65 |
Cultivated area size (ha−1) |
Average |
3.35 ± 3.78 |
2.05 ± 1.48 |
2.81 ± 2.86 |
Regarding education level, most of the household heads have received formal schooling (84.01%). The dominant ethnic group is Hausa (90.95%), followed by Fulani, Tuareg, and Kanuri. The cultivated area size per household ranges from 2.05 ha in the southern Sahel to 3.35 ha in the north, with an average size of 2.81 ha.
3.1.2. Species Providing NTFPs and Their Importance
A total of 42 woody species were identified, as presented in , where ten species are highlighted for their relatively high citation frequency. For transparency and comparability with other studies, the full list of all species and their importance according to agro-climatic areas is available in (Appendix 1).
In the North Sahelian area, Maerua crassifolia (15.05%), Lannea microcarpa (11.72%), and Piliostigma reticulatum (8.37%) emerged as the most prominent species, followed by Guiera senegalensis and Sclerocarya birrea (7.53% each). In contrast, the South Sahelian area was dominated by L. microcarpa (12.20%), Diospyros mespiliformis (11.72%), and S. birrea (8.35%), alongside Faidherbia albida and Hyphaene thebaica (7.70% each). These findings suggest that, despite the overall diversity of species recorded, a limited group of species accounts for most of the reported uses and cultural importance, illustrating their pivotal role in household subsistence strategies and local resilience.
Table 3. Woody species providing NTFPs and their importance according to the agro-climatic area.
North Sahelian Area |
South Sahelian Area |
Scientific Name |
Frequency of Citation (%) |
Scientific Name |
Frequency of Citation (%) |
Maerua crassifolia |
15.05 |
Lannea microcarpa |
12.20 |
Lannea microcarpa |
11.72 |
Diospyros mespiliformis |
11.72 |
Piliostigma reticulatum |
8.37 |
Sclerocarya birrea |
8.35 |
Guiera senegalensis |
7.53 |
Faidherbia albida |
7.70 |
Sclerocarya birrea |
7.53 |
Hyphaene thebaica |
7.70 |
Vachellia nilotica |
5.86 |
Piliostigma reticulatum |
6.9 |
Ziziphus mauritiana |
5.44 |
Balanites aegyptiaca |
4.33 |
Moringa oleifera |
5.44 |
Vachellia nilotica |
4.01 |
Faidherbia albida |
5.02 |
Maerua crassifolia |
3.85 |
Balanites aegyptiaca |
4.18 |
Ziziphus mauritiana |
3.85 |
3.1.3. Factors Influencing Availability
As shown in , the linear regression analysis conducted on 379 households shows that the model is overall significant (p < 0.001) with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.50. Two factors appear to be decisive: the number of species collected (β = 0.117; p = 0.009), which is positively and significantly associated with the total quantity collected, and household size (β = −0.017; p = 0.015), whose slightly negative effect suggests that internal resource distribution or activity diversification may limit the quantity collected per member. Other variables (gender, education, ethnicity, land area, collection distance, climate perceptions, parasitic attacks, and collection site) have no significant effects (p > 0.05), indicating a relative homogeneity in collection behaviors.
Table 4. Factors affecting NTFP availability.
logTotal Quantity
Collected/Household/Year |
Coefficient |
Std. Error |
z-value |
p-value |
Zone β1 |
0.028 727 |
0.325 898 |
0.88 |
0.379 |
Gender β2 |
−0.026 376 2 |
0.027 710 6 |
−0.95 |
0.342 |
Education β3 |
0.042 577 3 |
0.034 711 5 |
1.23 |
0.221 |
Ethnicity β4 |
−0.009 905 7 |
0.043 096 |
−0.23 |
0.818 |
Household Size β5 |
−0.011 111 9 |
0.011 049 6 |
−1.01 |
0.315 |
Field Area/Hectares β6 |
0.008 345 2 |
0.002 706 7 |
3.08 |
0.002 |
N Species β7 |
0.124 187 8 |
0.008 614 7 |
14.42 |
0.000 |
Collection Distance β8 |
−0.036 621 7 |
0.048 951 8 |
−0.75 |
0.455 |
Climate Change β9 |
0.002 463 5 |
0.003 240 4 |
0.76 |
0.448 |
Parasitic Infestation β10 |
0.044 710 3 |
0.026 087 3 |
1.71 |
0.087 |
Collection Location β11 |
−0.022 404 1 |
0.056 978 8 |
−0.39 |
0.694 |
Cons |
3.548 108 |
0.086 564 7 |
40.99 |
0.000 |
Wald Chi2 (11) |
21.45 |
|
|
|
Prob > Chi2 |
0.0000 |
|
|
|
3.1.4. Factors Influencing Degradation (Logit Model)
As shown in , the Logit model applied to 379 observations is overall significant (Wald χ2 (11) = 25.11; p = 0.0088) with a pseudo R2 of 0.0592, indicating that the included variables explain a significant portion of the NTFPs disappearance probability. Among the variables tested, ecological area shows a significant and negative effect (β = −0.63; p = 0.025), indicating that households located in certain areas are less likely to report NTFPs disappearance.
Table 5. Factors affecting NTFPs degradation.
Disappeared |
Coefficient |
Std. Error |
z-value |
p-value |
Area α1 |
−0.629 770 1 |
0.280 087 |
−2.25 |
0.025 |
Gender α2 |
−0.274 673 4 |
0.253 764 7 |
−1.08 |
0.279 |
Education α3 |
−0.603 692 2 |
0.369 810 8 |
−1.63 |
0.103 |
Household Size α4 |
−0.016 807 3 |
0.020 874 4 |
−0.81 |
0.421 |
Field Area Size/Ha α5 |
−0.008 217 1 |
0.106 271 6 |
−0.08 |
0.938 |
Nspecies α6 |
0.117 246 8 |
0.069 893 5 |
1.68 |
0.093 |
Collection Distance α7 |
−0.045 252 9 |
0.032 538 |
−1.39 |
0.164 |
Climate Change α8 |
−0.187 207 9 |
1.298 063 |
−0.14 |
0.885 |
Parasitic Infestation α9 |
1.427 658 |
1.703 534 |
0.84 |
0.402 |
Overlogging α10 |
0.378 468 1 |
1.307 855 |
0.29 |
0.772 |
Food Insecurity α11 |
0.055 745 5 |
1.293 281 |
0.04 |
0.966 |
Cons |
−1.724 231 |
1.420 925 |
1.21 |
0.225 |
Wald Chi2 (11) |
25.11 |
|
|
|
Prob > Chi2 |
0.0088 |
|
|
|
3.2. Marginal Effects
As shown in , the Logit model revealed a high average probability of NTFP extinction, estimated at about 71.6%. Marginal effects showed that some variables influence this risk significantly. Belonging to the northern Sahelian area reduces the likelihood of species disappearance by 13% (marginal effect = −0.130; p = 0.027) compared to the southern one. Similarly, higher education levels are associated with an 11% lower probability of extinction (marginal effect = −0.111; p = 0.066). In contrast, the number of species harvested exerts a positive effect (marginal effect = 0.024; p = 0.091), indicating that each additional species collected increases the probability of extinction at about 2.4%. This result highlights the risk of overexploitation when households diversify harvesting practices excessively, thereby intensifying pressure on natural resources. Other factors, including the gender of the household head, household size, and the distance to the collection sites, did not show statistically significant effects. Likewise, insecurity was not found to significantly influence species extinction.
Table 6. Marginal effects.
Variable |
dy/dx |
Std. Err. |
z |
p > z |
[95% C.I.] |
X |
Area* |
−0.130 484 1 |
0.058 81 |
−2.22 |
0.027 |
−0.245 758 - −0.015 21 |
0.414 894 |
Sex* |
−0.055 462 4 |
0.050 87 |
−1.09 |
0.276 |
−0.155 159 - 0.044 234 |
0.555 851 |
Education* |
−0.111 253 4 |
0.0606 |
−1.84 |
0.066 |
−0.230 033 - 0.007 526 |
0.840 426 |
Size |
−0.003 418 8 |
0.004 23 |
−0.81 |
0.419 |
−0.011 708 - 0.004 87 |
10.0426 |
Surface Area |
−0.001 671 4 |
0.021 61 |
−0.08 |
0.938 |
−0.044 03 - 0.040 687 |
1.726 06 |
Nspecies |
0.023 849 |
0.014 11 |
1.69 |
0.091 |
−0.003 809 - 0.051 507 |
4.364 36 |
Collection Distance |
−0.009 204 8 |
0.006 59 |
−1.40 |
0.162 |
−0.022 115 - 0.003 706 |
6.287 23 |
Climate Change* |
−0.038 625 9 |
0.271 51 |
−0.14 |
0.887 |
−0.570 771 - 0.493 519 |
0.316 489 |
Parasitic Infestation* |
0.201 937 9 |
0.1442 |
1.40 |
0.161 |
−0.080 683 - 0.484 559 |
0.026 596 |
Abusive Cut* |
0.072 931 4 |
0.237 54 |
0.31 |
0.759 |
−0.392 634 - 0.538 497 |
0.191 489 |
Food Insecurity* |
0.011 327 9 |
0.262 54 |
0.04 |
0.966 |
−0.503 245 - 0.525 901 |
0.460 106 |
Note: (*) dy/dx is for the discrete change of the dummy variable from 0 to 1.
3.3. Discussion
Results show that NTFPs exploitation is closely linked to household characteristics, with most respondents being married farmers and an average household size of around ten persons, representing both a source of labor and an increasing food demand (Faye et al., 2020; FAO, 2011; Shackleton et al., 2019). Beyond these socio-economic attributes, tree species play a central role in household livelihoods. The results confirm that M. crassifolia is particularly important in the northern Sahel, where it serves as both a source of food and fodder, in line with the findings of Nazirou et al. (2024). Similarly, D. mespiliformis appears more significant in the southern area, where it contributes to household income generation and provides multiple uses in food and traditional medicine, corroborating the observations of Ali et al. (2021). Other species such as L. microcarpa, S. birrea, and F. albida are present in both zones, highlighting their multifunctional value, while Z. mauritiana and B. aegyptiaca are also distinguished by their contribution to trading and income generation (Shackleton et al., 2015; Mahamane et al., 2021).
The linear regression result indicates that both woody species diversity and household labor determine the availability of Non-Timber Forest Products highly, supporting the evidence that in Sahel and West Africa, plant species richness enhances the access to NTFPs, improves dietary quality, and provides households with food and income opportunities (Osei et al., 2019). The lack of a significant effect of socio-economic variables supports (Ndiaye et al., 2024), indicating that collection remains a community-based activity, largely influenced by household composition and species diversity rather than individual characteristics or land size, as also noted by Mahamadou et al. (2020) and Soumana et al. (2023) in Niger and the Sahel. Furthermore, local governance and community-based management practices play a crucial role in the availability and sustainability of NTFPs, as highlighted by Moussa et al. (2023) in their study on the role of NTFPs in climate action in the West African Sahel.
Logit model results reveal a high probability of species extinction (71.6%), with significant marginal effects including that households in the northern area is facing lower risk of about 13% compared to those in the south, education reduces extinction probability by 11%, while harvesting a greater number of species increases this risk fot about 2.4% (Goussanou et al., 2019). These findings suggest that simultaneous exploitation of multiple species may exacerbate the risk of overharvesting, consistent with observations that increasing reliance on NTFPs for income can exceed the regeneration capacity of the harvested species (Twine et al., 2025; Ondo-Azi et al., 2025). Similar concerns have been raised in Central Africa, where unsustainable harvesting of Baillonella toxisperma wrecked both ecological resilience and local livelihoods (Reij & Garrity, 2016). Overall, these results highlight a transition from socio-economic factors to ecological pressures, showing that NTFPs’ sustainability in Sahelian systems is mainly conditioned by species availability, household dynamics, and local management practices. This underlines the importance of promoting biodiversity and implementing community-based strategies, such as Assisted Natural Regeneration, to sustain natural resources and strengthen resilience (IPCC, 2022; Reij et al., 2024).
4. Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of NTFPs in the livelihoods of Sahelian households and reveals the threats to their sustainability. Results confirm that the availability of NTFPs is primarily determined by demographic structure and the species diversity exploited, while their degradation depends on ecological conditions and the level of usage pressures. They also underscore the importance of integrating biodiversity and Assisted Natural Regeneration practices into management policies, strengthening community natural resource governance, diversifying income sources to reduce dependence on NTFPs, and implementing participatory monitoring of their dynamics. Such an approach would contribute to reconciling food security, household resilience, and ecological sustainability in Sahelian regions.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the World Food Programme (WFP) for this study, through the memorandum of understanding signed with the Dan Dicko Dankoulodo University of Maradi (UDDM).
Appendix
Table A1. Complete list of 42 species and their importance according to the agro-climatic area.
APG Family |
Scientific Name |
Names Locals (Hausa) |
Proportion of Respondents (%) |
North-Sahelian Zone |
South-Sahelian Zone |
Total |
Anacardiaceae |
Lannea microcarpa (Hochst. Ex A. Rich.) Engl. |
Farou |
11.72 |
12.20 |
12.06 |
Sclerocarya birrea |
Dania ou Loula |
7.53 |
8.35 |
8.12 |
Apocynaceae |
Leptadenia hastata (Pers.) Decne. |
Yadia |
- |
0.16 |
0.12 |
Arecaceae |
Hyphaene thebaica (L.) Mart |
Gorouba |
0.42 |
7.70 |
5.68 |
Bignoniaceae |
Stereospermum kunthianum Cham. |
Sansami |
- |
0.32 |
0.23 |
Burseraceae |
Boswellia dalzielii Hutch. |
Hano |
- |
0.16 |
0.12 |
Commiphora qfricana (Lour.) Dandy |
Dashi |
0.42 |
0.16 |
0.23 |
Capparaceae |
Boscia angustifolia |
Dilo |
0.42 |
|
0.12 |
Boscia salicifolia Oliv. |
Zuré |
0.84 |
0.64 |
0.70 |
Boscia senegalensis (Pers.) Lam. ex Poir. |
Anza |
0.84 |
0.16 |
0.35 |
Maerua angolensis DC. |
Cicciwa |
- |
0.16 |
0.12 |
Maerua crassifolia Forsk. |
Jiga |
15.06 |
3.85 |
6.96 |
Combretaceae |
Anogeissus leiocarpus (DC) Guill. Et Perr. |
Marké |
0.42 |
0.96 |
0.81 |
Combretum ghasalense |
Tsiri |
- |
0.32 |
0.23 |
Guiera senegalensis J.F. Gmel. |
Sabara |
7.53 |
0.64 |
2.55 |
Ebenaceae |
Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. Ex A.DC. |
Kania |
2.09 |
11.72 |
9.05 |
Euphorbiaceae |
Euphorbia balsamifera Ait. |
Aguwa |
0.84 |
0.32 |
0.46 |
Fabaceae |
Acacia raddiana |
Kandili |
0.84 |
0.96 |
0.93 |
Acacia seyal Del. |
Fara-‘k’aya |
0.84 |
0.32 |
0.46 |
Acacia sieberiana DC. |
Fara bagaruwa |
- |
0.64 |
0.46 |
Albizia chevalieri Harms |
Kassari |
- |
0.80 |
0.58 |
Bauhinia rufescens Lam. |
Dirga |
1.26 |
0.96 |
1.04 |
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight et Arn. |
Dundu |
- |
0.32 |
0.23 |
Faidherbia albida Del |
Gao |
5.02 |
7.70 |
6.96 |
Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br. Ex G. Don |
Dorowa |
- |
0.16 |
0.12 |
Piliostigma reticulatum (DC.) Hochst |
Kalgo |
8.37 |
6.90 |
7.31 |
Prosopis africana (Guill. et Perr.) Taub. |
Kiria |
- |
1.44 |
1.04 |
Senegalia senegal |
Dakwara |
0.84 |
0.48 |
0.58 |
Tamarindus indica L. |
Tsamia |
3.77 |
3.05 |
3.25 |
Vachellia nilotica |
Bagaroua |
5.86 |
4.01 |
4.52 |
Lamiaceae |
Vitex doniana sweet. |
Dumnia |
- |
3.05 |
2.20 |
Malvaceae |
Adansonia digitata L. |
Kouka |
7.11 |
2.09 |
3.48 |
Meliaceae |
Azadirachta indica A. Juss. |
Bedi |
2.51 |
2.09 |
2.20 |
Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) Juss. |
Madaci |
- |
0.16 |
0.12 |
Moraceae |
Ficus platyphylla Del. |
Gamji |
- |
0.64 |
0.46 |
Moringaceae |
Moringa oleifera Lam. |
Zogala ou El makka |
5.44 |
3.21 |
3.83 |
Rhamnaceae |
Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. |
Magaria |
5.44 |
3.85 |
4.29 |
Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Desf. |
Kourna |
- |
3.69 |
2.67 |
Rosaceae |
Neocarya macrophylla (Sabine) Prance |
Gawassa |
- |
0.32 |
0.23 |
Rubiaceae |
Mitragyna inermis (Willd.) Kuntze. |
Guiyeya |
0.42 |
0.64 |
0.58 |
Sapotaceae |
Vitellaria paradoxa gaertn. Syn. |
Kadé |
- |
0.32 |
0.23 |
Zygophyllaceae |
Balanites aegyptiaca (L.) Delille. |
Adoua |
4.18 |
4.33 |
4.29 |
Total |
|
|
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |