Carbapenem Resistance and Metallo-β-Lactamase Production in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Urogenital Tract Infections in Brazzaville

Abstract

The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria constitute a major global public health threat, compromising treatment efficacy and increasing morbidity and mortality associated with infections. In response to this concerning situation, carbapenems are considered last-resort antibiotics. However, Enterobacteriaceae exhibit high resistance rates to these drugs. The aim of this study was to determine carbapenem resistance profiles and the prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL) production among Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urogenital tract infections. Enterobacteriaceae strains were isolated on selective media from urine and vaginal swab samples and identified using the API 20 E system. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Mueller-Hinton disk diffusion method. MBL production was assessed using the combined carbapenem/carbapenem + EDTA disk test. A total of 123 Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from 325 samples, of which 81.6% were from urine and 17.4% from vaginal swabs. Identification revealed 12 species distributed across five genera: Escherichia, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Klebsiella, and Proteus. Susceptibility testing showed the highest sensitivity to ertapenem (79.67%) followed by meropenem (69.92%), whereas doripenem showed the lowest sensitivity (33.33%). Resistance patterns varied between species for different antibiotics. Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference in bacterial resistance among the different strains for all tested antibiotics. MBL production testing revealed that 100% of strains produced MBLs in the presence of imipenem. Only E. coli and Enterobacter aerogenes were MBL producers in the presence of meropenem. Despite the high resistance rates and the capacity of these strains to produce carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes, meropenem and ertapenem, due to their lower resistance rates, may still be considered first-line treatment options for urogenital tract infections caused by these bacterial genera.

Share and Cite:

Nieko, N. , Ngoulou, T. , Kaya-Ongoto, D. , Mabika, F. , Koumou, V. and Nguimbi, E. (2025) Carbapenem Resistance and Metallo-β-Lactamase Production in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Urogenital Tract Infections in Brazzaville. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 16, 502-515. doi: 10.4236/abb.2025.1611033.

1. Introduction

Urogenital Tract Infections (UTIs) are currently among the most common reasons for medical consultation and represent a major global public health issue, both in community and hospital settings [1]. Enterobacteriaceae are ubiquitous Gram-negative bacilli and opportunistic pathogens frequently implicated in UTIs [2]. Due to their wide distribution and ability to acquire virulence factors and antibiotic resistance mechanisms, they are isolated in both community and healthcare settings [3]. The emergence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae represent a major global public health threat, compromising treatment efficacy and increasing infection-associated morbidity and mortality [4]. Over the past decades, the emergence and spread of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to last-resort antibiotics such as carbapenems have posed a growing challenge to treatment efficacy [3]. Carbapenems, as broad-spectrum β-lactams, are often considered essential agents for the treatment of severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria [4]. However, the appearance of resistance mechanisms, mainly through carbapenemase production, poses a significant therapeutic challenge, limiting effective treatment options and increasing the risk of therapeutic failure and resistance dissemination via genetic transfer to other bacterial species. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae often produce enzymes that hydrolyze carbapenems, known as carbapenemases [5]. Among these enzymes, Metallo-β-Lactamases (MBLs) are particularly important due to their ability to inactivate a wide range of β-lactams, including carbapenems, and their resistance to clinically available β-lactamase inhibitors, except for avibactam, which does not inhibit MBLs [6]. In Africa, several studies have investigated carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae, including work by Habibou et al. [7] in Senegal, Ramkisson et al. [8] in South Africa, Garba et al. [9] in Burkina Faso, Ragueh et al. [10] in Djibouti, Dos et al. [11] in Gabon, and more recently by Hamidou et al. [12] in Niger and Benin. In the Republic of Congo, bacterial infectious diseases remain a major concern, further compounded by the absence of national surveillance on antibiotic resistance. The literature review revealed several studies on β-lactamase production in bacteria isolated from wound infections and on the transmission of β-lactam resistance among Enterobacteriaceae from mothers to children in Brazzaville [13] [14]. Mpelle et al. [15] reported the first detection of TEM, CTX-M, SHV, and OXA-48 β-lactamases in Escherichia coli in the Republic of Congo. Although Makaya et al. [16] (2022) studied MBL- and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Brazzaville, epidemiological data specific to carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from urinary infections remain insufficient. Therefore, it is crucial to improve understanding of carbapenem resistance profiles and MBL production prevalence among Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urogenital tract infections. This work contributes to strengthening strategies for surveillance, prevention, and management of urinary tract infections.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Materials

This prospective study was conducted over three months, from July 1 to September 30, 2022, at the Bacteriology Department of the National Public Health Laboratory in Brazzaville. Biological materials analyzed included bacterial isolates from urine and vaginal swab samples collected from patients of all ages and both sexes submitted for routine laboratory analysis. Any urine or vaginal swab sample submitted for routine biological analysis at the National Public Health Laboratory was included in the study. No ethical approval was obtained. This institution also has a mandate for research and scientific production. After the results were returned to patients, bacterial strains were used for the research component. The samples were received regularly during the study period and were included in this study, including any vaginal and urinary specimens intended for bacteriological analysis. After the results were given to the patients, a code was assigned to each sample based on the type of collection.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Isolation and Identification

Bacterial isolation was performed by culturing samples on Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar. Plates were incubated for 18 - 24 hours at 37˚C. Isolates were identified using the API 20 E system (BioMérieux, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.2.2. Quality Control

Quality control of antibiotic disks was performed using Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603, following CASFM recommendations [17].

2.2.3. Carbapenem Susceptibility Testing

The following antibiotics were tested: imipenem 10 µg, meropenem 10 µg, doripenem 10 µg, and ertapenem 10 µg. Resistance profiles were determined using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [18] [19]. Inocula were prepared by suspending a well-isolated colony from a 24-hour pure culture in 5 ml of 0.9% NaCl. Turbidity was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland using a Vitek Densichek. Mueller-Hinton agar plates were inoculated with a sterile swab as recommended by CLSI [20] [21]. Disks were placed on inoculated plates, which were incubated at 37˚C for 18 - 24 hours. Inhibition zone diameters were measured, and susceptibility was interpreted according to CASFM breakpoints [17]. Strains were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant. Strains were declared susceptible to doripenem, imipenem and meropenem when the critical diameter was ≥ 23 mm and ≥ 25 mm for ertapenem.

2.2.4. Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Strains: Combined Carbapenem/Carbapenem + EDTA Disk Test

This technique detects MBL production by pre-identified bacterial strains. In vitro activity of carbapenems (imipenem or meropenem) alone and combined with EDTA, an MBL inhibitor, was tested. Bacterial inocula were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland in 2 ml of 0.9% saline and seeded on Mueller-Hinton agar. Two disks of the same carbapenem were placed 3 cm apart. One disk was supplemented with 4 µL of 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8). After 18 - 24 hours of incubation at 37˚C, inhibition zones were measured. Strains were considered MBL producers if the inhibition zone around the carbapenem + EDTA disk was ≥7 mm larger than the carbapenem-only disk [16] [22], indicating restored carbapenem activity via MBL inhibition.

2.2.5. Statistical Analyses

Data were processed using Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, USA). Percentages were calculated from measured inhibition diameters. Resistance rates were compared using the Chi-square test, with significance set at p < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval, using GraphPad Prism 2008.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Collection

A total of 325 samples were collected: 185 urine samples (57%) and 140 vaginal swabs (43%).

3.2. Isolation and Identification of Strains

3.2.1. Isolation

Out of 325 samples, 123 were positive, giving a prevalence of 37.85%. Among positive samples, 100 were from urine (81.6%) and 23 (17.4%) from vaginal swabs (Figure 1).

3.2.2. Identification

Five genera, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Klebsiella, and Proteus were identified and distributed among twelve (12) bacterial species. Among these, Escherichia coli was the predominant species, accounting for 35%, followed by Klebsiella oxytoca at 11%. In contrast, Klebsiella ozaenae and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the least represented, each with a frequency of 3% (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Distribution of positive samples according to specimen type.

Figure 2. Different types of Enterobacteriaceae identified.

3.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility

Table 1 shows the results of antibiotic susceptibility testing performed on 123 Enterobacteriaceae strains. The strains were most susceptible to ertapenem (79.67%) and meropenem (69.92%). In contrast, they exhibited lower susceptibility to doripenem (33.33%).

Table 1. Overall resistance and susceptibility of the tested strains to carbapenems.

Antibiotics

Susceptibility N (%S)

Resistance N (%R)

DOR, 10 µg

41 (33.33%)

82 (66.67%)

IMI, 10 µg

63 (51.22%)

60 (48.78%)

MRP, 10 µg

86 (69.92%)

37 (30.08%)

ERP, 10 µg

98(79.67%)

25 (20.33%)

Legend: N: Number of strains, %S: Percentage of susceptibility, %R: Percentage of resistance, DOR: Doripenem, IMI: Imipenem, MRP: Meropenem, ERP: Ertapenem.

Table 2(a) and Table 2(b) present the rates of antibiotic resistance. These tables show that resistance rates vary depending on the strains and the antibiotics; however, the strains were less resistant to ertapenem and meropenem. The chi-square test revealed a significant difference in bacterial resistance among the different strains with respect to imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, and ertapenem.

Table 2. (a) Overall resistance and susceptibility of tested strains to carbapenems; (b) Overall resistance and susceptibility of tested strains to carbapenems.

(a)

Antibiotiques

Escherichia coli (N = 43)

Citrobacter koseri (N = 12)

Enterobacter aerogenes (N = 10)

Enterobacter gergoviae (N = 10)

Enterobacter cloacae (N = 08)

P-value

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

IMI, 10 µg

30 (69.76)

13 (30.24)

6 (50)

6 (50)

6 (60)

4 (40)

6 (60)

4 (40)

3 (37.5)

5 (62.5)

0.0003*

MRP, 10 µg

18 (41.86)

25 (58.14)

0

12 (100)

2 (20)

8 (80)

3 (30)

7 (70)

4 (50)

4 (50)

0.0182*

DOR, 10 µg

28 (65.11)

15 (34.89)

12 (100)

0

5 (50)

5 (50)

6 (60)

4 (40)

5 (62.5)

3 (37.5)

0.0009*

ERP, 10 µg

5 (11.62)

38 (88.38)

4 (33.33)

8 (66.64)

2 (20)

8 (80)

3 (30)

7 (70)

1 (12.5)

7 (87.5)

0.0292*

(b)

Antibiotiques

Klebsiella oxytoca (N = 14)

Klebsiella ozaenae (N = 04)

Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 04)

Proteus vulgaris (N = 10)

Proteus mirabilis (N = 08)

P-value

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

N (%R)

N (%S)

IMI, 10 µg

5 (35.71)

9 (64.29)

1 (25)

3 (75)

2 (50)

2 (50)

1 (10)

9 (90)

0

8 (100)

0.0003*

MRP, 10 µg

5 (35.71)

9 (64.29)

2 (50)

2 (50)

3 (75)

1 (25)

0

10 (100)

0

8 (100)

0.0182*

DOR, 10 µg

8 (57.12)

6 (42.88)

4 (100)

0

4 (100)

0

7 (70)

3 (30)

3 (37.5)

5 (62.5)

0.0009*

ERP, 10 µg

2 (14.28)

12 (85.72)

0

4 (100)

3 (75)

1 (25)

3 (30)

7 (70)

2 (25)

6 (75)

0.0292*

Legend: N: Number of strains; %S: Percentage susceptible; %R: Percentage resistant; *: p < 0.05 (statistically significant difference); DOR: Doripenem; IMI: Imipenem; MRP: Meropenem; ERP: Ertapenem.

Figure 3. Combined imipenem/imipenem + EDTA disk test.

3.4. Results of Combined Carbapenem/Carbapenem + EDTA Disk Tests

The combined disk tests revealed Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL) production among imipenem-resistant strains. All strains (100%) resistant to imipenem tested positive in the combined imipenem/imipenem + EDTA disk test (Figure 3). These MBL-producing strains also exhibited significant resistance to other antibiotics. Only E. coli and Enterobacter aerogenes produced MBLs in the presence of meropenem, with respective rates of 40% and 20% (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Distribution of MBL-producing strains.

4. Discussion

Antibiotic resistance among Enterobacteriaceae, particularly to carbapenems, represents a major public health challenge. This issue is critical both in industrialized countries and in developing countries, where self-medication and the uncontrolled sale of antibiotics outside legal frameworks are common. The main objective of this study was to describe the carbapenem resistance profile of Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from urogenital tract infections at the National Public Health Laboratory. These strains were obtained from urine and vaginal swab samples. A total of 123 strains, distributed across five genera of Enterobacteriaceae, were isolated and identified. The distribution of the 123 strains according to sample type showed that urine was the specimen from which Enterobacteriaceae were most frequently isolated. These results are consistent with those obtained by Al-Mayahie et al. [23], who reported urine as the most common sample type in hospitals in Iraq. In contrast, our results are higher than those reported by Alsamarai and Ali [24] in Kirkuk, Iraq, where only 41.6% of urine samples were culture-positive. The predominance of Enterobacteriaceae in urine samples in our study may be explained by the larger sample size of urine specimens compared to vaginal swabs. Bacterial identification revealed 12 different species, with E. coli being the most predominant, accounting for 35% of isolates. This finding is comparable to Moyen et al. [14], who reported a predominance of E. coli (36%) in studies of β-lactam resistance transmission among mothers and children in the Republic of Congo. Similarly, Goro [25] reported comparable results in Bamako. The predominance of E. coli in these samples can be explained by its role as a normal component of the intestinal microbiota. Although generally harmless, uropathogenic strains of E. coli can cause urinary and extra-intestinal infections, possessing virulence factors, including adhesins, that allow colonization of the urinary epithelium and resistance to clearance during bladder voiding [3].

The antibiotic susceptibility study revealed significant and variable resistance depending on the tested carbapenem. The highest resistance was observed for doripenem (66.67%), followed by imipenem (48.78%). Ertapenem was the most active molecule, with a resistance rate of 20.32%. These results are consistent with previous studies. For example, in Latin America, Costa et al. [26] reported 100% resistance to carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem). Similar results were obtained in Tunisia by Ben et al. [27], who reported a resistance rate of 55.8% to imipenem.

However, our results differ from those of Moyen et al. [13], who studied β-lactam activity and β-lactamase production in bacteria isolated from wound infections in Brazzaville, Congo, where strains were more sensitive to imipenem (resistance rate 10.82%). Ya-Ting et al. [28] in Taiwan region reported resistance rates of 95.5%, 74.26%, 61.6%, and 96.2% for the four tested antibiotics. Makaya et al. [3] reported 68.8% resistance to imipenem in E. coli in Brazzaville. Rodríguez et al. [29] observed 100% resistance to imipenem and 98% resistance to meropenem and doripenem in Colombia. In our study, ertapenem was highly effective against all tested strains, contrasting with Ben et al. [27], who reported 100% resistance to ertapenem. Differences in resistance may be attributed to temporal evolution, geographic location, antibiotic selection pressure, consumption patterns, and genetic transfer mechanisms.

Overall, the studied strains exhibited simultaneous resistance to multiple carbapenems. E. coli, along with other species, showed resistance to three carbapenem disks. These results are consistent with Moyen et al. [14], who demonstrated β-lactam resistance transmission among Enterobacteriaceae between mothers and children in Brazzaville. In that study, E. coli and K. oxytoca showed 30% resistance to ertapenem, while K. oxytoca strains were fully susceptible to imipenem compared to 30% resistance in E. coli. The observed carbapenem resistance rates are concerning, as carbapenems constitute the last line of defense against bacterial infections. The predominance and broad-spectrum resistance of E. coli pose a serious public health threat, undermining the effectiveness of available antibiotics. This may result from selection pressure due to the excessive use of antibiotics in hospital and community settings, as well as plasmid-mediated horizontal transfer of resistance genes [30]. Similar observations were made by Habibou et al. [7] in Senegal, reporting a prevalence of 60.83%. All genera studied, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Proteus, E. coli, and Citrobacter—showed resistance to the tested carbapenems. Mellouli et al. [31] reported similar findings in Tunisia. Abera et al. [32] observed low resistance rates in E. coli and K. pneumoniae producing ESBLs.

Carbapenem resistance can result from the selection of resistant bacteria favored by frequent use of these antibiotics in empirical treatment of severe nosocomial infections [33]. Literature data indicate that mechanical ventilation and treatment with carbapenems, alone or in combination with vancomycin, are major risk factors for acquiring imipenem resistance [34]. Resistance mechanisms may include non-enzymatic processes such as loss of OprD porin, active efflux systems (MexAB), or production of carbapenemases of the IMP and VIM types [35].

To contextualize the results of our study on carbapenem resistance in our institution, it is relevant to compare them with the global data provided by the 2023 GLASS report of the World Health Organization (WHO). This report reveals that carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae remains high in many regions of the world, particularly in Asia, Africa, and Latin America [36]. This situation is mainly attributed to the spread of certain carbapenem resistance genes, such as KPC and NDM, as well as to person-to-person transmission within healthcare facilities [37]. Moreover, socio-economic factors, such as limited access to healthcare and the overuse of antibiotics, contribute to this alarming trend [36]. In our local context, these global data confirm that carbapenem resistance is a major public health issue, especially in developing countries. The results of our study, showing a high prevalence of carbapenem resistance in our institution, therefore fit within a worrisome global context. It is imperative to strengthen surveillance, prevention, and infection control strategies to effectively combat this emerging threat [37].

In this study, all imipenem-resistant strains produced Metallo-β-Lactamases (MBLs), representing a 100% rate. This is higher than the 78.25% reported in India by Debasrita et al. [38]. These results differ from those of Makaya et al. [3] in Brazzaville, where 16.66% of strains were MBL producers. Gba et al. [39] in Côte d’Ivoire reported 78.6% of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa producing MBLs. In this study, 40% of E. coli produced MBLs in the presence of meropenem, lower than the 86.61% reported by Nu et al. [40] in Pakistan. Genetic variability among strains may explain these differences. A recent study in Morocco (2019 - 2023) found that all carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (n = 74) produced MBLs, with bla_NDM predominating (83.78%), often associated with bla_OXA-48 [41], similar to our findings. According to the international ATLAS program (2018 - 2020), nearly 50% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Africa and the Middle East carried MBLs [42]. A systematic review of 39 studies (2013 - May 2023) reported MBL-producing strain prevalence ranging from 6.8% to 100%, particularly high in Southern Europe and Asia [43]. Among MBL-producing strains, E. coli was the most prevalent, with 100% producing MBLs in the presence of imipenem, exceeding the 36.1% reported by Mudathir et al. [44] in Khartoum, Sudan. The combined test for the detection of Metallo-β-Lactamases (MBLs) using meropenem was limited to E. coli and Enterobacter aerogenes because these species are the main Enterobacteriaceae in which MBL production represents a frequent and clinically relevant mechanism of carbapenem resistance. Moreover, the interpretation criteria and reliability of the meropenem + EDTA combined test have been better validated for these Enterobacteriaceae in the CASFM/EUCAST recommendations, unlike other species in which alternative mechanisms (porin loss, AmpC overproduction, or production of KPC or OXA-48) may also contribute to resistance [22].

This study presents certain limitations that should be acknowledged. First, its monocentric nature limits the generalization of the results to other healthcare facilities in Brazzaville and in other departments. Second, the short duration of the investigation does not allow conclusions to be drawn regarding the temporal dynamics of carbapenem resistance. Finally, the absence of molecular confirmation of the genes encoding Metallo-β-Lactamases (MBLs) prevents the precise identification of the enzyme types involved and the assessment of their genetic distribution among the isolates studied.

5. Conclusion

This study aimed to establish the carbapenem resistance profile of Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from urogenital tract infections at the National Public Health Laboratory. A total of 123 strains were isolated from various biological samples, comprising five bacterial genera: Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Proteus, representing 10 species. E. coli was the most dominant species. The majority of strains were isolated from urine. The results show that the studied strains exhibited resistance to the tested carbapenems: 66.67% to doripenem, 48.78% to imipenem, 30.08% to meropenem, and 20.32% to ertapenem. Simultaneous resistance to imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem was observed. Significant differences in bacterial resistance among strains were noted for imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, and ertapenem. All imipenem-resistant strains produced MBLs, while only E. coli and Enterobacter aerogenes produced MBLs in the presence of meropenem. However, meropenem and ertapenem should be used as first-line agents for the treatment of infections caused by these bacterial genera.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Flores-Mireles, A.L., Walker, J.N., Caparon, M. and Hultgren, S.J. (2015) Urinary Tract Infections: Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Infection and Treatment Options. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13, 269-284.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E. and Biondo, C. (2021) Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens. Pathogens, 10, Article 1310.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Nieko, N.P.M.D., Kayath, C.A., Kaya-Ongoto, M.D. and Kinavouidi, D.J.K. (2024) First Detection of Virulence Factors in Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urogenital Tract and Correlation with Antimicrobial Resistance at the National Public Health Laboratory, Brazzaville. International Journal of Pathogen Research, 14, 8-19.[CrossRef]
[4] World Health Organization (2024) Antimicrobial Resistance: A Global Threat.
https://www.who.int/fr/health-topics/antimicrobial-resistance
[5] Pitout, J.D.D. and De Vinney, R. (2016) Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An Emerging Public Health Threat. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 16, 1091-1103.
[6] Nordmann, P., Naas, T. and Poirel, L. (2011) Global Spread of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17, 1791-1798.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Sarr, H., Niang, A.A., Diop, A., Mediannikov, O., Zerrouki, H., Diene, S.M., et al. (2023) The Emergence of Carbapenem-and Colistin-Resistant Enterobacteria in Senegal. Pathogens, 12, Article 974.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ramkisson, T. and Rip, D. (2023) Carbapenem Resistance in Enterobacterales from Agricultural, Environmental and Clinical Origins: South Africa in a Global Context. AIMS Microbiology, 9, 668-691.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Garba, Z., Bonkoungou, I.O.J., Millogo, N.O., Natama, H.M., Vokouma, P.A.P., Bonko, M.D.A., et al. (2023) Wastewater from Healthcare Centers in Burkina Faso Is a Source of ESBL, AmpC-β-Lactamase and Carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae. BMC Microbiology, 23, Article No. 351.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ragueh, A.A., Aboubaker, M.H., Mohamed, S.I., Rolain, J. and Diene, S.M. (2023) Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Isolates in Hospital Settings in Djibouti. Antibiotics, 12, Article 1132.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Dos Santos, S., Moussounda, M., Togola, M., Avoune Nguema, E., Matteya, C., Bignoumba, M., et al. (2024) Carbapenem-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Mothers and Newborns in Southeast Gabon, 2022. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 14, Article ID: 1341161.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Hamidou, O., Yacouba, A., Tapha, O., Moussa, H., Salifou, I.I., Brah, S., Mamadou, S. and Baba Moussa, L.S. (2025) Carbapenemase Genes in Hospital Wastewater in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. medRxiv, Preprint.
[13] Moyen, R., Ahombo, G., Nguimbi, E., Ontsira, N.E., Niama, R.F., Yala, G.C., et al. (2014) Activity of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics and Production of Beta-Lactamases in Bacteria Isolated from Wound Infections in Brazzaville, Congo. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 8, 2290-2294.[CrossRef]
[14] Moyen, R., Jemylah Empilo Ndjiwa Galekoua, S., Fabrice Yala, J., Pea Indra Roenate, B. and Baloki Ngoulou, T. (2022) Evidence of the Transmission of Resistance of Enterobacteria to Betalactamines between Mothers and Children in Brazzaville. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 8, 30-37.[CrossRef]
[15] Fils, L.M., Esther, N.O.N., Christian, A.K., Etienne, N., Rachel, M. and Simon, C.K. (2019) First Report of the Types TEM, CTX-M, SHV and OXA-48 of Beta-Lactamases in Escherichia Coli, from Brazzaville, Congo. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 13, 158-167.[CrossRef]
[16] Nieko, N.P.M.D., Morabandza, C.J., Kaya Ongoto, M.D., Kinavouidi, D.J., Mikia, H.J., Kangoula Dia Kikouidi, K.L.F., Onyankouang, I.S. and Niama, F.R. (2022) Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Metallo β-Lactamase and Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase among Enterobacteria Isolated at National Public Health Laboratory of Brazzaville. Journal of Advances in Microbiology Research, 3, 40-46.
[17] CA-SFM (2021) Comité de l’antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie Recommandations 2021 V.1.0 Avril.
https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CASFM2021__V1.0.AVRIL_2021.pdf
[18] Prats, G., Mirelis, B., Llovet, T., Muñoz, C., Miró, E. and Navarro, F. (2000) Antibiotic Resistance Trends in Enteropathogenic Bacteria Isolated in 1985-1987 and 1995-1998 in Barcelona. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 44, 1140-1145.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Baloki, N.T., Ahombo, G., Nguimbi, E., Ampa, R. and Moyen, R. (2019) Molecular Characterization and Distribution of Genes Encoding Resistance to Macrolides, Lincosamides and Streptogramines B in Community and Clinical Staphylococcus in Brazzaville, Congo. Afrique Science, 15, 352-363.
[20] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2010) Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Principales, Practices, and Challenges: A Report.
https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/CLSI/preview_X07-R+Vol.+30+No.+5.pdf
[21] Jonas, M.C., Etienne, N., Tarcisse, B.N., Rachel, M., Jolivet, M.M.L., Faly, S.M.A., et al. (2020) Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Pathogenic Bacteria Isolated from “Mabokés” Smothered Fish in Brazzaville, Congo. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 8, 138-148.[CrossRef]
[22] Yong, D., Lee, K., Yum, J.H., Shin, H.B., Rossolini, G.M. and Chong, Y. (2002) Imipenem-EDTA Disk Method for Differentiation of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Clinical Isolates of pseudomonas Spp. and acinetobacter Spp. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40, 3798-3801.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Gatya Al-Mayahie, S.M., Al-Guranie, D.R.T., Hussein, A.A. and Bachai, Z.A. (2022) Prevalence of Common Carbapenemase Genes and Multidrug Resistance among Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli Phylogroup B2 Isolates from Outpatients in Wasit Province/ Iraq. PLOS ONE, 17, e0262984.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Alsamarai, A.M. and Ali, S. (2016) Urinary Tract Infection in Female in Kirkuk City, Iraq: Causative Agents and Antibiogram. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5, 261-273.
[25] Goro, A.M. (2021) Étude de la résistance aux antibiotiques des entérobactéries isolées à Bamako de janvier 2020 à juin 2020. Thèse de doctorat, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (U.S.T.T.B), 118 p.
[26] Costa, B., Martínez-de-Tejada, G., Gomes, P.A.C., L. Martins, M.C. and Costa, F. (2021) Antimicrobial Peptides in the Battle against Orthopedic Implant-Related Infections: A Review. Pharmaceutics, 13, Article 1918.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Ben Helal, R., Dziri, R., Chedly, M., Klibi, N., Barguellil, F., El Asli, M.S., et al. (2018) Occurrence and Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Tunisian Hospital. Microbial Drug Resistance, 24, 1361-1367.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Chang, Y., Siu, L.K., Wang, J., Wu, T., Chen, Y., Chuang, Y., et al. (2019) Resistance Mechanisms and Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Escherichia coli in Taiwan Region, 2012-2015. Infection and Drug Resistance, 12, 2113-2123.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Rodríguez, E.A., Garzón, L.M., Gómez, I.D. and Jiménez, J.N. (2020) Multidrug Resistance and Diversity of Resistance Profiles in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Throughout a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Colombia. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 22, 358-366.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Ferjani, A., Mkaddemi, H., Tilouche, S., Marzouk, M., Hannechi, N., Boughammoura, L., et al. (2011) Caractéristiques épidémiologiques et bactériologiques des bactéries uropathogènes isolées dans un milieu pédiatrique. Archives de Pédiatrie, 18, 230-234.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Mellouli, A., Jaoua, M.A., Dhraief, S., Messadi, A.A. and Thabet, L. (2020) Molecu-lar Profile of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Burn Patients. Tunis Med, 98, 855-860.
[32] Abera, D., Negash, A.A., Fentaw, S., Mekonnen, Y., Cataldo, R.J., Wami, A.A., et al. (2024) High Prevalence of Colonization with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing and Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales in the Community in Addis Ababa Ethiopia: Risk Factors, Carbapenem Resistance, and Molecular Characterization. BMC Microbiology, 24, Article No. 402.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Grall, N., Andremont, A. and Armand-Lefèvre, L. (2011) Résistance aux carbapénèmes: Vers une nouvelle impasse? Journal des Anti-Infectieux, 13, 87-102.[CrossRef]
[34] Gildas Comlan Zohoun, A., Moket, D. and El Hamzaoui, S. (2013) Prevalence of Acinetobacter baunmanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Resistant to Imipenem by Production of Metallo-Lactamases in Rabat Military Teaching Hospital Mohammed V. Annales de Biologie Clinique, 71, 27-30.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Rossolini, G.M. and Mantengoli, E. (2005) Treatment and Control of Severe Infections Caused by Multiresistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 11, 17-32.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] World Health Organization (2023) Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report 2023. World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/initiatives/glass
[37] World Health Organization (2014) Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564748
[38] Chakraborty, D., Basu, S. and Das, S. (2010) A Study on Infections Caused by Metallo Beta Lactamase Producing Gram Negative Bacteria in Intensive Care Unit Patients. American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 6, 34-39.[CrossRef]
[39] Gba, K., Guessennd, N., Makaya, N., Tahou, E., Konan, F., Toty, A., et al. (2018) Detection of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in an Abidjan Hospital, Côte d’ivoire. Journal of Advances in Microbiology, 8, 1-8.[CrossRef]
[40] Ain, N.U., Iftikhar, A., Bukhari, S.S., Abrar, S., Hussain, S., Haider, M.H., et al. (2018) High Frequency and Molecular Epidemiology of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacilli in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 7, Article No. 128.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Dilagui, I., Loqman, S., Lamrani Hanchi, A. and Soraa, N. (2022) Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales in Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Morocco. Infectious Diseases Now, 52, 334-340.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Jacoby, G.A., Tulkens, P.M., Livermore, D.M., Falagas, M.E., Bonomo, R.A., Kaye, K.S., Paterson, D.L., Walsh, T.R., Woodford, N., Cantón, R., Nordmann, P. and Doi, Y. (2024) Molecular Epidemiology and Resistance Profiles of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens from Africa and the Middle East (2018-2020): Findings from the ATLAS Surveillance Program. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 13, 25-39.
[43] Falcone, M., Giordano, C., Leonildi, A., Galfo, V., Lepore, A., Suardi, L.R., et al. (2023) Clinical Features and Outcomes of Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales: A 3-Year Prospective Study from an Endemic Area. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 78, 1111-1119.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Adam, M.A. and Elhag, W.I. (2018) Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase Acquired Genes among Carbapenems Susceptible and Resistant Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates Using Multiplex PCR, Khartoum Hospitals, Khartoum Sudan. BMC Infectious Diseases, 18, Article No. 668.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.