Peptic Esophagitis in Hospitals in Ouahigouya: Epidemiological and Diagnostic Aspects (About 2578 Cases) ()
1. Introduction
Peptic esophagitis corresponds to an inflammatory condition of the esophageal mucosa due to the corrosive action of reflux material during gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). When this GERD is prolonged and recurrent, it becomes pathological. Several factors favoring GERD, such as hiatal hernia, cardiac incontinence, and obesity due to increased intra-abdominal pressure, can contribute to its occurrence. It is the most common disease of the esophagus. Its development can be punctuated by complications, the most feared of which is endobrachyesophagus (EBE) because of its risk of degeneration [1]. The prevalence of reflux esophagitis is approximately 40% to 50% in symptomatic subjects [2]. In Burkina Faso, some studies had already focused on peptic esophagitis [3]-[5]. A more recent study carried out in a hospital setting in Ouagadougou on peptic esophagitis reported an endoscopic prevalence of 35.13% [6]. In Ouahigouya, on the other hand, no study had been carried out on esophageal pathology using the endoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to study the epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of peptic esophagitis in Ouahigouya using the endoscopic approach.
2. Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study which covered the period from March 1, 2014 to February 29, 2024, i.e., 10 years. It was carried out in the digestive endoscopy units of 3 private health structures in the city of Ouahigouya and the Regional Teaching hospital of Ouahigouya.
The patients in our study came from the city of Ouahigouya, other provinces in the Northern region, and towns and villages bordering Mali. Indeed, the Malian border is located 57 km from the city of Ouahigouya, which is the capital of the Northern region of Burkina Faso. Its population is estimated at 124,587 inhabitants, including 61,451 men and 63,136 women, according to the 5th general census of the population and housing of Burkina Faso in 2022 [7].
The study included patients aged 4 years and older, of both sexes, of all origins and socio-professional categories in whom peptic esophagitis was diagnosed by upper digestive endoscopy. These peptic esophagitis lesions were described and classified according to Savary-Miller [3] into 4 grades:
Grade I: Isolated, non-confluent erosions.
Grade II: Longitudinal, confluent erosions, not covering the entire circumference.
Grade III: Longitudinal, confluent erosions, covering the entire circumference.
Grade IV: Ulcers, strictures, endobrachyesophagus.
Patients whose reports were unusable were not included in the study.
The endoscopy equipment consisted of a FUJINON brand video endoscope with 3 types of gastroscope, namely: FUJINON EG 200 FP, FUJINON EG 201 FP, FUJINON EG 250 WR. They were powered by a light source and connected to a FUJINON EVE EPX 201 brand processor, which generates the images on a monitor (screen) in the 3 private health structures. A KARLSTORZ brand gastroscope was used at the CHUR of Ouahigouya.
Since the quality of the endoscopic examination can only be optimized through good preparation, this had to be rigorous. The patient had to be fasting, with the last meal having been the day before at 8 p.m. at the latest, which allowed for at least 8 hours of gastric emptying.
Disinfection of the endoscope was carried out according to the current procedures of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED) [8]. After cleaning and brushing the operating channel in a soapy solution with HEXANIOS® or CYTEAL®, depending on market availability, high-level disinfection was carried out by immersion in a 5% glutaraldehyde solution (STERANIOS®) for at least 10 minutes. The patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and a bite block was inserted into the mouth after removal of any dentures. The endoscopist explored the upper digestive tract in axial vision and then in retrovision when withdrawing the endoscope.
Data were collected using a survey form specifying the patient’s marital status, socio-demographic characteristics, indications for upper digestive endoscopy, and results. These endoscopic results were recorded by 3 Hepato-gastroenterologists.
The collected data were analyzed on a microcomputer using Epi-Info software version 7.2.6.0. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi2 test with a significance level of p < 0.05.
3. Results
During the study period, 4078 esophageal lesions were found out of a total of 5278 upper digestive endoscopies. Among these esophageal pathologies, there were 2578 cases of peptic esophagitis. They represented 43.52% of all esophageal pathologies and came first in order of frequency. The annual frequency was 257.8 cases/year as reported in Figure 1.
There were 1459 women and 1119 men, a sex ratio of 1.3. The average age was 39.62 years, with extremes of 8 and 98 years. There was a female predominance in almost all age groups except at the extremes of life (see Figure 2).
The professions were dominated by housewives with 995 cases (38.60%), followed by farmers/breeders with 488 (18.89%) and civil servants with 191 cases (17.07%) (see Table 1).
The indications for endoscopic examination were dominated by epigastralgia, as shown in Table 2, with 1670 cases or 46.47% followed by GERD with 356 cases (9.9%) and ulcer syndrome with 257 cases (7.15%). The endoscopic aspects were dominated according to the Savary Miller classification.
Figure 1. Distribution of peptic esophagitis by year.
Figure 2. Distribution of patients by age and gender.
Table 1. Distribution of patients according to profession (n = 2578).
Occupation |
Effective |
Percentage (%) |
Housewife |
995 |
38.6 |
Farmer/breeder |
487 |
18.9 |
Civil servents |
440 |
17 |
Students |
191 |
7.4 |
Traders |
189 |
7.3 |
Informal sector |
79 |
3 |
Gold miner |
69 |
2.7 |
Not specified |
39 |
1.5 |
Military/paramilitary |
25 |
1 |
Religious |
21 |
0.8 |
Driver |
20 |
0.7 |
Retirement |
15 |
0.6 |
Without current occupation |
5 |
0.2 |
Tacheron |
2 |
0.08 |
Worker |
1 |
0.04 |
Total |
2578 |
100 |
Table 2. Distribution of indications for upper digestive endoscopy (n = 2578).
Indication |
Number |
Frequency (%) |
Epigastralgia |
1670 |
46.47 |
GERD |
356 |
9.91 |
Ulcer syndrome |
257 |
7.15 |
Heartburn |
181 |
5.03 |
Nausea/Vomiting |
121 |
3.36 |
Retrosternal pain |
119 |
3.31 |
Abdominal pain |
89 |
2.47 |
Dysphagia |
80 |
2.23 |
Suspicion of hiatal hernia |
72 |
2.79 |
Regurgitation |
63 |
1.75 |
Sign of portal hypertension (PHT) |
56 |
1.56 |
Dyspepsia |
56 |
1.56 |
Control |
52 |
1.45 |
Not specified |
49 |
1.36 |
Hematemesis |
42 |
1.17 |
Eructation |
40 |
1.11 |
Esophageal foreign body sensation |
32 |
0.89 |
Odynophagia |
30 |
0.83 |
Hiccups |
28 |
0.78 |
Melena |
26 |
0.72 |
Chest pain |
22 |
0.61 |
Anemia |
16 |
0.45 |
General health deterioration (GHD) |
16 |
0.45 |
Hypersalivation |
15 |
0.42 |
Suspected esophagitis |
15 |
0.42 |
Hepatomegaly |
14 |
0.39 |
Cough |
11 |
0.31 |
Epigastric mass |
6 |
0.17 |
Halitosis |
6 |
0.17 |
Others* |
54 |
1.50 |
Others*: Taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, accidental ingestion of foreign bodies, dysphonia, cholestasis syndrome, aphasia, pharyngitis, mouth ulceration, laryngitis, postural syndrome, health check-up, bloating, palpitation, digestive candidiasis, functional bowel disorders (FBDs).
A patient could have several indications.
Grade 1 peptic esophagitis predominated in 86.77% of cases, followed by Grade 4 in 9.89% of cases. These data are presented in Figure 3.
Grade 4 peptic esophagitis was dominated by endobrachyesophagus (EB) in 92.16%, and monitoring of ulcers in 6.27% of cases, as shown in Table 3.
Figure 3. Distribution of peptic esophagitis according to the Savary Miller classification (n = 2578).
Endobrachyoesophagus predominated in 235 cases, or 92.16% of the population, followed by ulcers in 16 cases, or 6.27% (see Table 2).
Table 3. Distribution of lesions according to Savary Miller Grade IV (n = 255).
Grade IV injury |
Effective |
Percentage (%) |
EBO |
235 |
92.16 |
Ulcer |
16 |
6.27 |
Stenosis |
04 |
1.57 |
Total |
255 |
100 |
We found a female predominance of Grade-I peptic esophagitis, i.e., 58.16% compared to 41.84% in men. The frequencies of Grade-II (57.69%), Grade-III (75%) and Grade-IV (53.73%) peptic esophagitis were, on the contrary, higher in men than in women.
The distribution of peptic esophagitis according to grade and gender is given in Table 4.
Table 4. Distribution of cases of peptic esophagitis according to grade and sex.
Peptic esophagitis |
Total |
Female gender |
Male gender |
Effective |
% |
Effective |
% |
Grade I |
2237 |
1454 |
58.16 |
936 |
41.84 |
Grade II |
78 |
33 |
42.31 |
45 |
57.69 |
Grade III |
8 |
2 |
25 |
6 |
75 |
Grade IV |
255 |
118 |
46.27 |
137 |
53.73 |
Chi2 = 22.9511, p = 0.000.
Grade I peptic esophagitis was significantly associated with young female subjects under 60 years of age (p = 0.000 < 0.05). Grades II, III and IV were significantly associated with male subjects under 60 years of age (p < 0.05).
The distribution of peptic esophagitis according to grade, sex and age is given in Table 5 and Table 6.
Table 5. Distribution of peptic esophagitis according to grade, sex and age (n = 2578).
Variable |
Effective |
% Grade I |
Khi2 |
p |
% Grade II |
Khi2 |
p |
Age (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60 |
2249 |
88.73 |
340,306 |
0.000 |
75.64 |
97,167 |
0.002 |
≥60 |
329 |
11.27 |
|
|
24.36 |
|
|
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
1124 |
41.84 |
212,538 |
0.000 |
57.69 |
64,961 |
0.011 |
Female |
1454 |
58.16 |
|
|
42.31 |
|
|
Table 6. Distribution of peptic esophagitis according to grade, sex and age (n = 2578) (continued).
Variable |
Effective |
% Grade III |
Khi2 |
p |
% Grade IV |
Khi2 |
p |
Age (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<60 |
2249 |
37.50 |
178,320 |
0.000 |
79.22 |
163,596 |
0.000 |
≥60 |
329 |
62.50 |
|
|
20.78 |
|
|
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
1124 |
75 |
32,177 |
0.073 |
53.73 |
117,996 |
0.001 |
Female |
1454 |
25 |
|
|
46.27 |
|
|
4. Discussion
We faced some difficulties inherent in the retrospective nature of the study, with sometimes incomplete information on the bulletins; of certain information on the upper digestive endoscopy report registers (dietary habits, lifestyle, anthropometric data such as body mass index, abdominal circumference, the notion of stress factor, etc.). These data would have allowed us to carry out in-depth analyses on the risk factors.
Peptic esophagitis was the most common esophageal lesion, representing 43.52% (2578) of esophageal diseases. The average annual incidence was 257.8.
An almost identical frequency was found in Madagascar by Peghini et al. [9] (43.77%); in Ouagadougou by Ouattara et al. [6] (40.86%) on esophageal pathology in a hospital environment in Ouagadougou. On the other hand, in France, Canard [10] reported a frequency slightly lower than ours (38.14%).
This frequency is, however, higher than that reported by Bougouma et al. [11] (36.19%) in Ouagadougou and Kondé et al. [12] (35.1%) in Mopti.
It was lower than that reported by Moussavou-Kombila et al. [13] (61.22%) in Gabon. The duration of certain studies shows that peptic esophagitis has been a predominant esophageal pathology for a long time, and is still increasing today, perhaps because of the westernization of our lifestyle.
This difference in prevalence between studies may be related to the duration of the studies and the size of the study populations. This increase in peptic esophagitis could be explained by the increasingly worrying growth of factors predisposing to GERD, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, a diet too high in fat, obesity, and hiatal hernia.
In the study by Cissé et al. in Bamako, smoking, with 18.18%, was the predominant factor in the lifestyle of patients with peptic esophagitis. For Ouattara et al. [6] in Ouagadougou, the lesions most frequently associated with peptic esophagitis were gastropathies (37.62%) and hiatal hernia (24.41%). For Cissé et al. in Bamako, on the other hand, these were gastroduodenal ulcers (37.5%) and hiatal hernia-gastric tumors (25%).
The average age of our patients was 39.62 years, with extremes of 8 and 98 years. This result is similar to those of other authors:
Ouattara et al. [6], in Ouagadougou, reported an average age of 37.63 years ± 13.83 years with extremes of two months and 99 years.
It is lower than that of Cissé et al. [14] in Bamako, where the average age was 48.27 ± 16.36 years with extremes of 19 - 72 years.
The highest frequency of peptic esophagitis (30.18%) was observed in patients aged between 30 and 39 years. This could be explained by the fact that our population is predominantly young. It differs from that reported by Cissé et al. [14] in Bamako (50 - 59 years).
The predominance was female with 1459 women or 56.59% of the population and the sex ratio was 0.76. Ouattara et al. [6], through their study on peptic esophagitis in health structures in Ouagadougou, also reported a female predominance of 57.34% and a sex ratio of 0.74.
However, Cissé et al. [14] in Bamako reported a male predominance with a sex ratio of 2.14.
Taking estrogen-progestin contraceptives, anti-inflammatories, increased consumption of spicy foods, stress, a sedentary lifestyle, and obesity could be factors explaining this female frequency, all of which promote GERD. This is about a hypothesis that could not be tested due to the lack of lifestyle and clinical data, as mentioned in the limitations.
Female predominance was observed in most age groups except at the extremes of life. The most affected age group was 30 to 39 years, with a female predominance (403 cases or 15.63%). The frequency of the condition in young female adults is probably due to the greater use of contraceptive methods, in this case oesoprogestogens, anti-inflammatories (in front of cycle disorders such as dysmenorrhea, dystrophies, torsions), spices in the diet, and the permanent stress to which this population is exposed.
Housewives (FAF) (38.60%), farmers/breeders (18.89%) were the most represented. This can be explained by the fact that this class of the population is exposed to difficult socio-economic conditions. It is subject to permanent stress, promoting GERD through hypersecretion of acid, with the more or less long-term consequence of peptic esophagitis.
The main indication for digestive endoscopy was epigastralgia, with a frequency of 46.47% (1670), followed by GERD (9.91% or 356 cases). This result is similar to that of Maïga et al. [15] in Bamako, in whom epigastralgia represented 49.66% and GERD 18.12%.
It is in fact lower than that of Ouattara et al. [6], which reported 59.96%.
The anxiety generated by this upper digestive symptom, which can be seen in certain cardiac and respiratory pathologies, pushes patients to consult in these specialties, from where they are referred for Gastroenterology consultation after having eliminated the suspected organ. This situation, associated with the fact that the pyrosis has an epigastric starting point, explains the high frequency of this indication. For a long time, authors such as Maïga et al. [15], Klauser et al. [16] had explained this high prevalence of epigastralgia in peptic esophagitis by the frequent involvement of the lower esophagus, and the possible association of esophagogastroduodenal affections.
In the presence of ulcer syndrome (7.15% in our study), it is necessary to consider looking for esophagitis.
The predominance of Grade I peptic esophagitis according to the Savary-Miller classification (86.77%) was also reported by other authors including: Bougouma et al. [11] (87.63%), Ouattara et al. [6] (88.05%) and Soulama [17] (98.24%) all in Ouagadougou. Early consultation of patients could explain the discovery of peptic esophagitis lesions at the early stage.
On the other hand, Cissé et al. [14] in Bamako, and Peghini et al. [9] in Madagascar reported that this predominance concerned Grade II peptic esophagitis with respective rates of 31.8% and 91.89%.
Our study reported a predominance of EBO in92.16% (235 cases) in Savary Miller Grade IV found in 255 of our patients, followed by ulcer (6.27%) and esophageal stenosis (1.57%).
The frequencies of peptic esophagitis Grade II (56%), Grade III (75%) and Grade IV (53.75%) were higher in men than in women (respectively 44%, 25% and 46.25%). This same observation was made by Ouattara et al. [6] and Sia [5], in whom men were more represented except for Grade I. In men, this high frequency of peptic esophagitis, observed after the 6th decade, indicates that esophagitis worsens with age; it is associated with prolonged exposure to risk factors, associated with the chronicity of gastroesophageal reflux. Thus, it can be admitted that in the context of senile neuropathy, the appearance of motor disorders of the esophagus and the alteration of the lower esophageal sphincter could promote GERD and disorders of esophageal clearance.
Grade I peptic esophagitis was significantly more frequent in females under 60 years of age (p < 0.05). Grades II, III and IV were more frequent in males over 60 years of age (p < 0.05) with a statistically significant difference. Ouattara et al. [6] found this trend in a study on peptic esophagitis in health facilities in Ouagadougou, with this higher frequency of Grades II and III in males over 40 years of age. The earlier recourse to care by women compared to men could well explain these results.
5. Conclusion
Peptic esophagitis is a common pathological entity in upper digestive endoscopy. It predominates in women and young adults. It is rare before the age of 20 and frequent between 30 and 40 years. Although Grade I peptic esophagitis predominated in our series, Grade IV came in second place with 92.16% of EBO. Monitoring of the endobrachyesophagus is essential to avoid missing dysplasia and later esophageal adenocarcinoma.