Hodge Classes in Hodge Manifolds

Abstract

The Hodge conjecture states that the Hodge group of Hodge classes is equal to the algebraic group generated by algebraic subvarieties on a Hodge manifold. To prove the conjecture, we introduce the Hodge structure, the Lefschetz decomposition, and polarization on the cohomology groups of the manifold, and we use mathematical induction on the degrees of the primitive cohomologies in the Lefschetz decomposition. We show that every Hodge class on a Hodge manifold is a rational linear combination of the cohomology classes of algebraic subvarieties of the manifold. The Lefschetz isomorphisms on the cohomology groups of a Hodge manifold are algebraic in the product space. As a consequence, we show that the inverses of the Lefschetz isomorphisms are also algebraic in the product space.

Share and Cite:

Cho, Y.S. (2025) Hodge Classes in Hodge Manifolds. <i>Advances in Pure Mathematics</i>, <b>15</b>, 518-528. doi: <a href='https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2025.158026' target='_blank' onclick='SetNum(144689)'>10.4236/apm.2025.158026</a>.

1. Introduction

In 1951, W. Hodge [1] announced the Hodge conjecture. The early mathematicians studied the Hodge conjecture on the compact Kähler manifolds and the cohomology groups with the integer coefficients. Some of them are the followings.

Atiyah and Hirzebruch [2] constructed a torsion cohomology class which is Hodge but not algebraic. Kollár [3] found an example of a Hodge class which is not algebraic in the integral cohomology groups of a projective complex manifold. Mumford [4] constructed an abelian variety whose Hodge class is not generated by products of divisor classes, and Weil [5] generalized the example. Zucker [6] constructed a counterexample to the Hodge conjecture as complex tori with a Hodge class which is not algebraic. Voisin [7] proved that on Kähler varieties the Chern classes of coherent sheaves give more Hodge class than the Chern classes of vector bundles, and the Chern classes of coherent sheaves are insufficient to generate the Hodge classes. Thus, the Hodge conjecture for Kähler varieties is not true.

The modern statement of the Hodge conjecture [8]-[10]: Let X be a smooth complex projective manifold. Then every Hodge class on X is a linear combination with rational coefficients of the cohomology classes of complex subvarieties of X .

In mathematics, the solutions of differential equations give much information on the objects which we want to study [11]-[13]. The Hodge conjecture is to find the algebraic cycle class for each Hodge class. Many mathematicians [14]-[20] have studied the Hodge conjecture and its related areas.

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n . The Hodge conjecture says the Hodge group Hdg 2k ( X ) is equal to the algebraic group H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg for 0≤k≤n . To prove the conjecture, we use the Hodge decomposition, the Lefschetz decomposition and polarization on the cohomology groups of X , and the induction on the degrees of the primitive cohomologies of X [9] [14] [21].

We introduce some definitions and results without proofs. In Section 2, we recall Kähler manifolds with fundamental form, and on cohomology groups Hodge decomposition, Lefschetz decomposition, and polarization. We review Hodge manifolds, Kodaira embedding and ample line bundle.

In Section 3, we introduce Hodge and algebraic classes of Hodge manifolds, the Hodge conjecture and some known results.

In Section 4, on Hodge manifolds, using the Lefschetz decomposition, polarization, and the induction on degrees, we want to show that every Hodge class of Hodge manifolds is algebraic. The morphisms between Hodge structures yield Hodge classes in the product space. The Lefschetz isomorphism and its inverse are morphisms on Hodge structures. Using above results, we show that they are algebraic. In this paper, the dimensions are the complex dimensions.

2. Hodge Manifold

We are familiar with the Kähler manifolds and every Hodge manifold is Kähler. We introduce the Kähler manifolds and their properties which we use in this paper.

2.1. Hodge Structure

Let ( X,h ) be a compact Kähler manifold of dimension n with a Kähler metric h and the associated fundamental 2-form Ω. Let ℓ=[ Ω ] be the cohomology class of the 2-form Ω.

(2.1.1) In the holomorphic coordinates ( z 1 ,⋯, z n ) of X , we can write them as follows:

h= ∑ μ,ν h μν d z μ ⊗d z ¯ ν =g+( −2i )Ω,  h μν = h ¯ νμ ,

u ¯ t ( h μν )u>0   if   u≠0,

Ω= i 2 ∑ μ,ν h μν d z μ ∧d z ¯ ν ,

and dΩ=0 , Ω is real and type (1,1).

(2.1.2) If Δ=d d * + d * d , □ =∂ ∂ * + ∂ * , □ ¯  = ∂ ¯ ∂ ¯ * + ∂ ¯ * ∂ ¯ are Laplacians, then

Δ=2=2  □ ¯ ,  ∗Δ=Δ∗,  ∗ □ ¯ = □ ¯  ∗,

where ∗ is the Hodge star operator. Every cohomology class is represented by a unique harmonic form.

(2.1.3) The cohomologies of X have the Hodge decompositions:

H k ( X,ℂ )= ⊕ p+q=k H p,q ( X ),  H ¯ p,q ( X )= H q,p ( X ).

(2.1.4) The Lefschetz decomposition:

H k ( X,ℂ )= ⊕ 2r≤k ℓ r ∪ H 0 k−2r ( X,ℂ ),

where H 0 k−2r ( X,ℂ )=Ker[ ℓ n−k+2r+1 ∪: H k−2r ( X,ℂ )→ H 2n−k+2r+2 ( X,ℂ ) ] is the primitive cohomology of X. Also,

H 0 k ( X,ℂ )= ⊕ p+q=k H 0 p,q ( X ),

where H 0 p,q ( X )=Ker[ ℓ n−k+1 ∪: H p,q ( X )→ H n−k+p+1, n−k+q+1 ( X ) ] .

(2.1.5) There is a polarization Q on H k ( X,ℂ ) :

Q: H k ( X,ℂ )× H k ( X,ℂ )→ℂ

defined by

Q( ξ,η )= ∑ 2r≤k ( −1 ) k( k+1 ) 2 +r ∫ X ℓ n−k+2r ∪ ξ r ∪ η r ,

where ξ= ∑ r ℓ r ∪ ξ r , η= ∑ r ℓ r ∪ η r ∈ H k ( X,ℂ ) . Then the polarization Q on H k ( X,ℂ ) is orthogonal, nondegenerate, and positive definite on the Lefschetz decomposition, and satisfies the Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations [21].

2.2. Hodge Manifold

(2.2.1) A closed form φ on X is said to be integral if the cohomology class [ φ ] is in the image of the natural map H * ( X,ℤ )→ H * ( X,ℂ ) . Let ( X,h ) be a compact Kähler manifold and Ω be its associated fundamental form. If Ω is an integral form, then Ω is called a Hodge form of X and h is called a Hodge metric on X , and ( X,h ) is called a Hodge manifold.

(2.2.2) Kodaira Embedding Theorem [22]: A compact Kähler manifold is Hodge if and only if it is a complex projective algebraic manifold.

i) Every complex submanifold of a complex projective space is Hodge.

ii) Let { w 1 ,⋯, w 2n } be a 2n independent periods in the complex space ℂ n of dimension n . The complex torus X:= ℂ n /[ w 1 ,⋯, w 2n ] is a compact Kähler manifold. However, X is a Hodge manifold if and only if the n×2n matrix [ w 1 ,⋯, w 2n ] is a Riemann matrix [21].

(2.2.3) A compact Kähler manifold X admits a positive line bundle L→X if and only if X is Hodge. Here a line bundle L→X is positive means that, if

h is a metric on L , Ω= ∂ ¯ ∂logh and its first Chern class c 1 ( L )= i 2π [ Ω ] , then

Ω is a positive definite Hermitian symmetric matrix.

(2.2.4) Let X be a Hodge manifold and L→X be a positive holomorphic line bundle. If for each point x∈X there is a section s∈Γ( X,L ) such that s( x )≠0 , then X is embedded in the projective space ℙ N , where N:=dim( Γ( X,L ) )−1 . In this case L→X is called very ample. A line bundle L→X is called ample if there is an m≥1 such that L ⊗m →X is very ample. Thus every Hodge manifold admits an ample line bundle.

(2.2.5) Let X be an algebraic variety defined by the zero locus of k homogeneous polynomials on a projective space ℙ N . Then X is a Hodge manifold of codimension k in ℙ N . In particular, if N=4 , k=1 , and the homogeneous polynomial has degree 5, then the quintic threefold X is Hodge and Calabi-Yau since c 1 ( TM )=0 . The quintic threefold X plays a crucial role in mirror symmetry [11] and the Hodge conjecture holds on X by Subsection 3.5.

3. Hodge and Algebraic Classes

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n , and ℓ= c 1 ( L )∈ H 2 ( X,ℚ ) be the first Chern class of an ample line bundle L→X .

3.1. The Hard Lefschetz Theorem [23]

The cup product map

ℓ n−k ∪ :  H k ( X;ℚ )→ H 2n−k ( X,ℚ )

is an isomorphism of Hodge structures, and the pairing

( α,β ) ℓ = ∫ X ℓ n−k ∪α∪β ,  α,β∈ H k ( X,ℚ )

is nondegenerate. On the Lefschetz decomposition:

H 2k ( X,Q )= ⊕ k r=0 ℓ r ∪ H 0 2k−2r ( X,Q ), H 0 k,k ( X )= ⊕ k r=0 ℓ r ∪ H 0 k−r,k−r ( X )

the pairing (  ,  ) ℓ is orthogonal and nondegenerate.

3.2. Hodge Group

For 0≤k≤n , the group

Hdg 2k ( X ):= H 2k ( X,ℚ )∩ H k,k ( X )

is called the Hodge group of Hodge classes with degree 2k , and the group

H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg :={ ∑ α i [ Z i ] :a finite sum| α i ∈ℚ,  Z i  is a subvariety of codimension k in X, for each i }

is called the algebraic group of X of algebraic classes with degree 2k .

3.3. Algebraic Class

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n . Then for 0≤k≤n , the Hodge decomposition is

H 2k ( X,ℂ )= ⊕ p+q=2k H p,q ( X )⊃ H k,k ( X )

For each subvariety Z of codimension k in X , if α∉ H n−k,n−k ( X ) , then ∫ Z α =0 by type reason. Thus, the algebraic class [ Z ] is in Hdg 2k ( X ) . Therefore

H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg ⊂ Hdg 2k ( X ).

3.4. The Hodge Conjecture (1951)

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n . Then

Hdg 2k ( X )= H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg ,  0≤k≤n .

That is, Hdg 2k ( X )⊂ H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg , 0≤k≤n .

3.5. Known Results [9]

Let X be a connected Hodge manifold of dimension n . Then

1) H 0 ( X,ℚ )= Hdg 0 ( X )= H 0 ( X,ℚ ) alg =ℚ( [ X ] ) ,

2) H 2n ( X,ℚ )= Hdg 2n ( X )= H 2n ( X,ℚ )=ℚ( [ pt ] ) ,

3) (Lefschetz)

Hdg 2 ( X,ℤ )= H 2 ( X,ℤ ) alg ,

Hdg 2n−2 ( X )= H 2n−2 ( X,ℚ ) alg .

Here (3), (4) can be proved by the exponential exact sequence

0→ℤ→ Θ X → Θ X * →1,

and Subsection 3.1 the hard Lefschetz theorem.

4. Hodge Classes Are Algebraic

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n , and L→X be an ample line bundle with the Chern class ℓ:= c 1 ( L )∈ H 2 ( X,ℂ ) .

4.1. Mathematical Induction

By Subsection 3.5 we have, for k=0,1,n−1,n

Hdg 2k ( X )= H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg ,

and by Subsection 3.3, for 0≤k≤n

H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg ⊂ Hdg 2k ( X ).

We want to prove that for 2≤k≤n−2 ,

Hdg 2k ( X )⊂ H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg

by the induction.

4.2. Hodge and Lefschetz Decompositions

The Hodge and Lefschetz decompositions are

H 2k ( X,C )= ⊕ p+q=2k H p,q ( X )= ⊕ 0≤r≤k ℓ r ∪ H 0 2k−2r ( X,C ), H k,k ( X )= ∑ r=0 k ℓ r ∪ H 0 k−r,k−r ( X ),

where

H 0 k−r,k−r =Ker[ ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪: H k−r,k−r ( X )→ H n−k+r+1,n−k+r+1 ( X ) ]

is the primitive cohomology group of type ( k−r,k−r ) of X . By (2.1.4), there is a polarization Q on H 2k ( X,ℂ ) such that the decompositions are orthogonal and nondegenerate.

4.3. Primitive Decomposition

Let α∈ Hdg 2k ( X )= H 2k ( X,ℚ )∩ H k,k ( X ) be a Hodge class with degree 2k of X . Then α∈ H k,k ( X ) has a type ( k,k ) with coefficients in ℚ . Since

H k,k ( X )= ℓ 0 ∪ H 0 k,k ( X )⊕ ℓ 1 ∪ H 0 k−1,k−1 ( X )⊕⋯⊕ ℓ k ∪ H 0 0,0 ( X )

is orthogonal and nondegenerate, α∈ H k,k ( X ) is uniquely written as

α= ∑ r=0 k ℓ r ∪ α k−r ,   α k−r ∈ H 0 k−r,k−r ( X ).

Choose generic sections σ i of the ample bundle L→X , i=1,2,⋯,k , and let L r = ∩ i=1 r σ i −1 ( 0 ) , and L 0 =X . Then L r ⊂X is a subvariety of codimension r in X and the cycle class [ L r ]= ℓ r ∈ H 2r ( X,ℚ )∩ H r,r ( X ) .

4.4. Induction Hypothesis

Find a codimension k−r subvariety A k−r of X such that its cohomology cycle class [ A k−r ]= α k−r ∈ H 0 k−r,k−r ( X ) . Then the Hodge class

ℓ r ∪ α k−r =[ L r ]∪[ A k−r ]=[ L r ∩ A k−r ]∈ ℓ r ∪ H 0 k−r,k−r ( X )⊂ H k,k ( X )

is algebraic. Prove this by the mathematical induction on k−r . By Subsection 3.5 there are A 0 =X and A 1 ⊂X such that

α 0 =[ X ],   α 1 =[ A 1 ]

and

ℓ k ∪ α 0 =[ L k ∩X ]∈ ℓ k ∪ H 0 0,0 ( X ), ℓ k−1 ∪ α 1 =[ L k−1 ∩ A 1 ]∈ ℓ k−1 ∪ H 0 1,1 ( X ).

4.5. Primitiveness

Assume that there are subvarieties A 0 , A 1 ,⋯, A r−1 in X such that

[ A i ]= α i ,  [ L k−i ∩ A i ]= ℓ k−i ∪ α i ∈ ℓ k−i ∪ H 0 i,i ( X ).

Since α k−r ∈ H 0 k−r,k−r ( X ) , the cup map

ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪: H k−r,k−r ( X )→ H n−k+r+1,n−k+r+1 ( X )

satisfies ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪ α k−r =0 . Locally we can write

ℓ n−2k+2r+1 :=[ ∑ | J |=n−2k+2r+1 c J d z J ∧d z ¯ J ],

and

α k−r :=[ ∑ | I |=k−r d I d z I ∧d z ¯ I ].

Then ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪ α k−r =0 if and only if for each I,J , I∩J≠∅ , I,J⊂{ 1,2,⋯,n } .

4.6. Analytic Continuation

While ℓ is locally represented, in holomorphic coordinates

ℓ=[ i 2 ∑ μ,ν h μν d z μ ∧d z ¯ ν ]

and ℓ is hermitian symmetric. Since I∩J≠∅ for each I,J in ℓ n−2k+2r+1 and α k−r there is a 2-form ℓ ′ in ℓ n−2k+2r+1 and α k−r if necessary, by the change of coordinates. By the analytic continuation [24], the 2-form is globally defined on X such that ℓ n−2k+2r ∪[ ℓ ′ ]= ℓ n−2k+2r+1 and [ ℓ ′ ]=ℓ . A generic section s:X→L has the zero locus s −1 ( 0 ) , and its cycle class

[ s −1 ( 0 ) ]=[ L 1 ]=[ ℓ ′ ]=ℓ= c 1 ( L ).

The Lefschetz isomorphism

ℓ n−2( k−r ) ∪: H 2( k−r ) ( X )→ H 2n−2( k−r ) ( X )

implies that ℓ n−2( k−r ) ∪ α k−r ≠0 if α k−r ≠0 . However ℓ n−2( k−r )+1 ∪ α k−r =( ℓ n−2( k−r ) ∪ α k−r )∪ℓ=0 .

4.7. Interior and Exterior Products

The 2-form ℓ∈ H 1,1 ( X ) , the orientation, the metric on X and the polarization Q on H 2k ( X,ℂ ) define the interior and exterior products, for the definitions see [8]. Let

i: H k−r,k−r ( X )→ H k−r−1,k−r−1 ( X ), e: H k−r−1,k−r−1 ( X )→ H k−r,k−r ( X )

be the interior and exterior products.

Then for each ℓ∈ H 1,1 ( X ) , α∈ H k−r,k−r ( X ) , β∈ H k−r−1,k−r−1 ( X ) ,

Q( i( l )α,β )= ( −1 ) [ ( 2k−2r−2 )( 2k−2r−1 ) 2 +( r+1 ) ] ∫ X ℓ n−2k+2r+2 ∪i( α )∪β = ( −1 ) k ∫ X ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪α∪β = ( −1 ) k ∫ X ℓ n−2k+2r ∪α∪e( l )β = ( −1 ) [ ( 2k−2r )( 2k−2r+1 ) 2 +r ] ∫ X ℓ n−2k+2r ∪α∪e( l )β =Q( α,e( l )β ).

Thus, we have

Q( i( ℓ )α,β )=Q( α,e( ℓ )β ).

Then there is a unique class β k−r−1 ∈ H k−r−1,k−r−1 ( X ) such that

i( ℓ )⋅ α k−r = β k−r−1   and   α k−r =e( ℓ ) β k−r−1 .

Also

Q( β k−r−1 , β k−r−1 )=Q( i( ℓ ) α k−r ,i( ℓ ) α k−r )=Q( α k−r ,e( ℓ )i( ℓ ) α k−r )=Q( α k−r , α k−r )≠0 ,

since α k−r ≠0 . Thus the β k−r−1 ≠0 . Moreover,

ℓ n−2k+2( r+1 )+1 ∪ β k−r−1 = ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪( l∪ β k−r−1 )∪l =( ℓ n−2k+2r+1 ∪ α k−r )∪l =0∪l=0.

Thus β k−r−1 ∈ H 0 k−r−1,k−r−1 ( X ) is primitive. While the degree of β k−r−1 is

deg( β k−r−1 )=2( k−r−1 )<2( k−r )

for 0≤r≤k . By our induction hypothesis of the degree k , there is a subvariety B k−r−1 of codimension k−r−1 in X such that [ B k−r−1 ]= β k−r−1 .

4.8. Induction

Let A k−r = B k−r−1 ∩ L 1 . Then A k−r is a subvariety of codimension k−r in X . The corresponding cycle class is

[ A k−r ]=[ B k−r−1 ∩ L 1 ]=[ B k−r−1 ]∪[ L 1 ]= β k−r−1 ∪ℓ= α k−r .

The Lefschetz components of the Hodge class α

ℓ r ∪ α k−r =[ L r ∩ A k−r ]∈ H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg

are algebraic cycle classes. Thus, the Hodge class

α= ∑ r=0 k ℓ r ∪ α k−r = ∑ r=0 k [ L r ∩ A k−r ] ∈ H 2k ( X,Q ) alg

is an algebraic cycle class, that is,

Hdg 2k ( X )⊂ H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg .

4.9. Theorem 1

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n . Then the Hodge group Hdg 2k ( X ) is equal to the algebraic group H 2k ( X,ℚ ) alg for k=0,1,⋯,n . ◼

4.10. Morphism of Hodge Structures

Let H 1 and H 2 be Hodge structures of weight k 1 and k 2 , respectively and k 2 − k 1 =2r . Then the morphisms ϕ: H 1 → H 2 are Hodge classes in Hdg 2r ( Hom( H 1 , H 2 ) ) . For details see [9].

4.11. The Algebraicity of Lefschetz Isomorphism

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n and ℓ be the first Chern class of an ample line bundle L→X . Then the Lefschetz theorem states that the cup map

ℓ n−k ∪: H k ( X,ℚ )→ H 2n−k ( X,ℚ )

is an isomorphism of Hodge structures for each k . By Subsection 4.10,

[ ℓ n−k ∪ ]∈ Hdg ** [ Hom( H k ( X,Q ), H 2n−k ( X,Q ) ) ] = Hdg ** [ H k ( X,ℚ ) * ⊗ H 2n−k ( X,Q ) ] = Hdg ** [ H 2n−k ( X,Q )⊗ H 2n−k ( X,Q ) ] ⊂ Hdg ** [ H 4n−2k ( X×X,Q ) ],

where ∗∗=( 2n−k )+( 2n−k )=4n−2k . By (4.9), the Hodge class [ ℓ n−k ∪ ] is algebraic in X×X .

In fact, let σ i :X→L , i=1,2,⋯,n−k , be generic sections, Z= ∩ i=1 n−k σ i −1 ( 0 ) ⊂X , and W= i Δ ( Z ) where i Δ :X→X×X is the diagonal map, then Z has codimension n−k in X , and W has codimension 2n−k in X×X . Thus [ ℓ n−k ∪ ]=[ W ]∈ H 4n−2k ( X×X,ℚ ) is algebraic.

4.12. The Inverse of Lefschetz Isomorphism

The inverse

( ℓ n−k ∪ ) −1 : H 2n−k ( X,ℚ )→ H k ( X,ℚ )

of the Lefschetz isomorphism is an isomorphism of Hodge structures. As in Subsection 4.11,

[ ( ℓ n−k ∪ ) −1 ]∈ Hdg 2k ( Hom( H 2n−k ( X,Q ), H k ( X,Q ) ) ) = Hdg 2k ( H k ( X,ℚ )⊗ H k ( X,ℚ ) )⊂ Hdg 2k ( H 2k ( X×X,ℚ ) )

is Hodge and algebraic by Subsection 4.9 since the product space X×X is a Hodge manifold of dimension 2n .

These contents are called the Lefschetz standard conjecture.

4.13. Theorem 2

Let X be a Hodge manifold of dimension n and ℓ be the first Chern class of an ample line bundle L→X . Then there is a codimension k subvariety Z in X×X such that

[ Z ]=[ ( ℓ n−k ∪ ) −1 ]∈ H 2k ( X×X,ℚ ),

that is, the inverse of the Lefschetz isomorphism is algebraic. ◼

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Hodge, W.V.D. (1951) Differential Forms on a Kähler Manifold. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 47, 504-517.[CrossRef]
[2] Atiyah, M.F. and Hirzebruch, F. (1962) Analytic Cycles on Complex Manifolds. Topology, 1, 25-45.[CrossRef]
[3] Ballico, E., Catanese, F. and Ciliberto, C. (1992) Trento Examples. In: Ballico, E., Catanese, F. and Ciliberto, C., Eds., Classification of Irregular Varieties, Springer, 134-139.[CrossRef]
[4] Mumford, D. (1969) A Note of Shimura’s Paper? Discontinuous Groups and Abelian Varieties? Mathematische Annalen, 181, 345-351.[CrossRef]
[5] Weil, A. (1979) Abelian Varieties and the Hodge Ring. In: Scientific Works, Collected Papers, Vol. III (1964-1978), Springer, 421-429.
[6] Zucker, S. (1977) The Hodge Conjecture for Cubic Fourfolds. Compositio Mathematica, 34, 199-209.
[7] Voisin, C. (2002) A Counterexample to the Hodge Conjecture Extended to Kähler Varieties. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2002, 1057-1075.[CrossRef]
[8] Voisin, C. (2002) Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I. Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef]
[9] Voisin, C. (2016) The Hodge Conjecture. In: Nash, J.F. and Rassias, M.Th., Eds., Open Problems in Mathematics, Springer, 521-543.[CrossRef]
[10] Cho, Y.S. (2021) Complex Manifolds. Kyowoo Publishing.
[11] Cho, Y.S. (2025) Calabi-Yau Manifolds ∙ Mirror Symmetry. Kyowoo Publishing.
[12] Cho, Y.S. (1991) Finite Group Actions on the Moduli Space of Self-Dual Connections. I. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 323, 233-261.[CrossRef]
[13] Cho, Y.S. and Hong, S. (2011) Dynamics of Stringy Congruence in the Early Universe. Physical Review D, 83, Article ID: 104040.[CrossRef]
[14] Cho, Y.S. (2025) The Algebraicity of Lefschetz Isomorphisms. Preprint.
[15] Bakker, B., Grimm, T.W., Schnell, C. and Tsimerman, J. (2023) Finiteness for Self-Dual Classes in Integral Variations of Hodge Structure. Épijournal de Géométrie Algébrique, No. 1, 1-25.[CrossRef]
[16] Bost, J.B. and Charles, F. (2022) Quasi-Projective and Formal-Analytic Arithmetic Surfaces. arXiv: 2206.14242v2.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14242v2
[17] Cattani, E., Deligne, P. and Kaplan, A. (1995) On the Locus of Hodge Classes. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 8, 483-506.[CrossRef]
[18] Deligne, P., Milne J., Ogus A. and Shih K. (1982) Hodge Cycles, Motives, and Shimura Varieties. Springer-Verlag.[CrossRef]
[19] Griffiths, P.A. (1969) Some Results on Algebraic Cycles on Algebraic Manifolds. Oxford University Press, 93-191.
[20] Schnell, C. (2023) Hodge Theory and Lagrangian Fibrations on Holomorphic Symplectic Manifolds. arXiv: 2303.05364v2.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05364v2
[21] Wells, R.O. (2008) Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds: Grad. Springer.
[22] Kodaira, K. (1954) On Kahler Varieties of Restricted Type an Intrinsic Characterization of Algebraic Varieties). The Annals of Mathematics, 60, 28-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[23] Lefschetz, S. (1924) L’Analysis Situs et la Géométric Algébrique. Gauthier-Villars et cie.
[24] Ahlfors, L.V. (1978) Complex Analysis: International Series in Pure & Applied Mathematics. McGraw-Hill.

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.