Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Knee Function Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Research Progress ()
1. Research Background
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays an important role in the activities of the knee joint. Anterior cruciate ligament injury is the most common sports injury. In severe cases, it can involve the meniscus and cartilage of the knee joint, and even produce joint distortion [1]. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the most common repair surgery, which mainly reconstructs the anterior cruciate ligament by using autologous tendon, allogeneic tendon or artificial ligament [2]. With the development of sports and the promotion of national fitness, the number of patients with ACL injury is increasing. More than 175,000 patients in the United States need ACLR surgery every year [3]. Because of the pain and swelling caused by local microcirculation disorder of ACL injury before operation and the toughening of graft in the early stage after operation, the degree of muscle atrophy is aggravated. Therefore, solving the problems of muscle strength decline and muscle atrophy after operation is the focus of postoperative rehabilitation, and it is also an important guarantee for patients to restore normal physiological function [4] [5].
According to the guidelines of the American Physical Therapy Association, the resistance load of a single progressive resistance training should be greater than 60% 1RM (One-Repetition Maximum) is the best parameter to improve muscle strength [6]. However, ACLR cannot achieve this load training early after surgery, and traditional rehabilitation methods such as strength training and neuromuscular training have limited therapeutic effects on ACLR patients. Studies have shown that if limb training is carried out under the condition of moderate restriction of blood flow at the proximal end of the limb, even low load resistance muscle training may cause similar training effects to high load resistance muscle training [7]. Bood flow restriction training (BFRT), also known as compression training, is a method of exerting pressure on the proximal end of the limb by means of special devices such as inflatable cuffs to achieve partial occlusion of the blood flow of the pressurized limb, resulting in local hypoxia. At the same time, it is supplemented by a lower intensity of 1RM (20% - 30%) to produce a training effect similar to high-load resistance exercise [8]. Low-intensity resistance training can not only achieve the same training effect as high-load resistance exercise, but also promote muscle hypertrophy, increase muscle strength and hormone secretion. Combined with low-load resistance exercise, it can also effectively improve cardiopulmonary function. Compared with high-load resistance exercise, BFRT produces less mechanical stress and cardiovascular system pressure, which is safer than traditional high-load exercise, and is suitable for people with musculoskeletal diseases and chronic diseases. Therefore, BFRT is expected to provide a new method for clinical ACLR postoperative patients to increase muscle and reduce muscle atrophy, and promote knee function rehabilitation training. At the same time, it is beneficial to the exercise of cardiopulmonary function in middle-aged and elderly patients with ACLR.
2. BFRT Research Status
2.1. Overview and Origin of BFRT
Blood flow restriction training was first discovered and popularized by Sato. The use of BFRT in the early stage was mainly concentrated in the field of sports, which could effectively improve the muscle strength and quality of athletes [9]. In recent years, the application of BFRT in the field of clinical medical rehabilitation has become more and more extensive. With the wide spread of the effectiveness of BFRT, this training method has been gradually applied and promoted in many countries, providing a new way of functional recovery during rehabilitation for subjects who are not clinically suitable for high-load exercise.
2.2. Exploring the Mechanism of BFRT
It has been reported that the biggest advantage of blood flow restriction training is that it can improve muscle strength and endurance without applying high-intensity load, and achieve the same effect as high-load training [10]. Many scholars have carried out a series of studies on the physiological mechanism of its role, but there is no clear conclusion. Mechanical tension and metabolic changes are considered to be the main reasons for muscle hypertrophy adaptation after BFRT.
2.2.1. Changes in Metabolic Levels
Studies have shown that during the process of blood flow restriction, the muscle produces a microenvironment of ischemia and hypoxia. When combined with exercise, the degree of ischemia and hypoxia is aggravated [11]. Substances such as carbon dioxide, lactic acid and adenosine can stimulate vasodilation. At the same time, these substances are easy to diffuse through the cell membrane to the intercellular space, acting on vascular smooth muscle to produce a strong vasodilation effect, which increases blood flow and provides the required oxygen and nutrients for the tissues in the ischemic area. Under the stimulation of reperfusion after repeated ischemia and hypoxia, the vascular compliance, wall tension and endothelial cell shear stress were enhanced, and the changes of carbon monoxide/endothelin levels were regulated, so that the internal circulation function was improved [12] [13]. Pan Ying’s experiment [14] showed that BFRT not only had low energy consumption, small degree of muscle micro-damage, but also had better intervention effect on microvascular function, which was related to the change of microcirculation function. At the same time, the change of endothelial cell shear stress will promote the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, stimulate capillary regeneration, and further increase the blood perfusion of microvessels [15]. It has been reported that muscle groups can significantly increase the concentration of adrenaline, lactic acid, growth hormone, interleukin and other hormones when performing BFR combined with low-intensity training. Growth hormone can be as high as 290 times the static level in 15 minutes after exercise [16]. Li Zhuoqian’s research [17] points out that the effect of BFR combined with low-intensity resistance training on the increase of hormone concentrations such as growth hormone and testosterone is more significant than that of BFR combined with high-intensity training. Similar studies showed different results. There was no significant change in hormone concentration in BFR combined with low-intensity resistance training, which was considered to be due to the difference in the BFRT scheme used.
2.2.2. Collection of Muscle Fibers
The increase of type II muscle fiber recruitment is an important reason for the increase of muscle cross-sectional area. Studies have shown that low-intensity BFRT can cause more motor unit recruitment and activation of fast muscle fibers [18]. The reason may be due to the insufficient oxygen supply of slow muscle fibers after blood flow restriction, and the accumulated metabolites activate the afferent nerve, thereby inhibiting the innervation of α neurons to type I muscle fibers and increasing the recruitment of type II muscle fibers, which are more sensitive to the increase of muscle cross-sectional area. Schoenfeld [19] also found that during BFRT combined with low-intensity training, the aggregation of muscle fibers increased, and the cross-sectional area of fast muscle fibers increased more significantly than that of slow muscle fibers. At the same time, some scholars have proposed that BFRT-induced muscle hypoxia environment can accelerate the recruitment of fast glycolytic muscle fibers. The muscle fiber is one of the larger fiber subtypes, accounting for most of the muscle strength. These fibers have abundant contraction filaments, and the contraction force produced by them will have a direct impact on the increase of muscle strength and the increase of muscle cross-sectional area [20]. The above studies show that BFRT promotes the recruitment of muscle fibers is another important mechanism for muscle thickening and muscle strength enhancement.
2.2.3. Muscle Protein Synthesis and Muscle Cell Swelling
In addition to the above studies, BFRT-induced cell swelling may lead to another mechanism of cell hypertrophy. Yasuda [21] believed that after BFRT, intracellular hydration mediated cell swelling, increased cell protein synthesis and amino acid uptake, reduced protein hydrolysis, and promoted muscle growth. Therefore, cell swelling may be an important mechanism for promoting muscle hypertrophy. Xu S [22] found that muscle hypertrophy was mainly regulated by protein conversion rate when studying the mechanism of BFRT-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. BFR increased protein synthesis through signaling pathways to promote muscle hypertrophy and inhibited protein degradation through ubiquitin proteasome to prevent muscle atrophy. Manini [23] studied the expression of myogenic and proteolytic mRNAs after 8 hours of knee extension exercise in subjects under BFRT, and found that BFRT reduced transcripts related to the proteolytic pathway, that is, BFR unchanged muscle generation and reduced proteolytic genes related to muscle remodeling. Some scholars have suggested that the expression of anabolic genes and the long-term increase of protein synthesis will be an important reason for muscle strength enhancement and hypertrophy. For example, hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-1α) and its downstream targets and its downstream target-driven angiogenesis are likely to play an important role in the enhancement of muscle endurance and oxidative capacity [24].
In summary, the mechanism of BFRT promoting muscle function recovery may involve many aspects. Most scholars believe that the level of metabolic stress and mechanical stress are the main mechanisms for low-intensity BFRT to play a role. The changes of the two will cause the increase of hormone concentration in the body, type II muscle fiber recruitment, cell swelling, etc., will promote protein synthesis and inhibit protein hydrolysis to cause muscle function enhancement.
3. Application Status of BFRT in Muscle Function Rehabilitation after ACLR
As a new treatment method, BFRT has achieved good application and promotion in foreign countries, and has been applied to all aspects of knee joint diseases. Knee joint diseases are mostly caused by pain, which leads to synovial joint-derived muscle strength inhibition. Patients often cause muscle disuse atrophy and decreased muscle strength due to protective braking after surgery [25]. BFRT combined with low-load resistance exercise can achieve similar rehabilitation effects as high-load resistance training, which is well reflected in the rehabilitation of knee joint diseases. Many foreign scholars have carried out experimental observation on the effect of BFRT on rehabilitation training after ACLR operation. Different treatment schemes and their therapeutic effects are shown in Table 1.
3.1. Foreign Research Status
As a new treatment method, BFRT has achieved good application and promotion in foreign countries, and has been applied to all aspects of knee joint diseases. Knee joint diseases are mostly caused by pain, which leads to synovial joint-derived muscle strength inhibition. Patients also often cause muscle disuse atrophy and decreased muscle strength due to protective braking after surgery. BFRT combined with low-load resistance exercise can achieve similar rehabilitation effects as high-load resistance training, which is well reflected in the rehabilitation of knee joint diseases. Many foreign scholars have carried out experimental observation on the effect of BFRT on rehabilitation training after ACLR operation. Different treatment schemes and their therapeutic effects are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Foreign research status.
Research Author |
number of cases |
intervention time |
control group |
observer group |
Degree of pressure/ Sleeve width |
clinical effect |
Kacin [26], 2021 |
18 |
After operation, for 3 weeks |
Knee joint extension flexion resistance movement Training load: low load |
Control group + LL-BFRT Control group + SHAM-BFRT Training load: low load |
BFRT: 1800 mmHg Sham-BFRT: 20 mmHg/13.5 cm |
LL-BFRT increased the cross-sectional area of quadriceps femoris and the ability of isokinetic peak torque of muscle, but it was less effective than other higher frequency training. |
Curran [27], 2020 |
34 |
After operation, for 8 weeks |
High load leg lift training load: high load (70% 1RM) |
Control group + BFRT (HL-BFRT) Training load: high load (70% 1RM) |
80% limb occlusion pressure |
There was no significant difference in the measurement results between the two groups (P > 0.05). BFRT based on high-intensity exercise could not significantly improve the strength, activation and volume of the quadriceps. |
Jack [28], 2022 |
32 |
After surgery, for a period of 12 weeks |
Progressive rehabilitation Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load |
80% limb occlusion pressure |
After ACLR, BFRT can reduce muscle and bone loss and improve the time to return to exercise, and the functional results are comparable to those of standard rehabilitation. |
Kilgas [29], 2019 |
18 |
Postoperative 5 ± 2 years, for 4 weeks |
Single leg knee extension, half squat, walking Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load |
50% limb occlusion pressure |
The muscle thickness of rectus femoris, vastus lateralis and knee extensor in affected legs was significantly increased compared with that before training (P > 0.05), which proved that BFRT could improve the function of quadriceps femoris for a long time after ACLR. |
Žargi [30], 2018 |
20 |
Preoperative, for 8 days |
SHAM + knee extension resistance exercise Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT (occlusion 30 s, perfusion
45 s) Training load: low load |
Experimental group: 150 mmHg/14 cm Control group: 20 mmHg/
14 cm |
There was no deterioration of quadriceps endurance in the BFRT group at 4 weeks after operation, while the muscle endurance in the sham stimulation group decreased by 50 %. There was no significant difference in muscle endurance between the two groups at 12 weeks after operation. The short-term preconditioning of BFRT can maintain the quadriceps endurance of ACLR patients. |
Table note: HL-BFRT: high load blood flow restriction training; hL-RT: High load resistance training; lL-BFRT: low load blood flow restriction training; sHAM: False stimulus.
3.2. Domestic Research Status
At present, the application of BFRT is still in its infancy in the postoperative rehabilitation stage of knee joint diseases in China, and its application status is shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Domestic research status.
Research Author |
number of cases |
intervention time |
control group |
observer
group |
Degree of pressure /Sleeve width |
clinical effect |
Li Qi [31], 2019 |
36 |
After operation, for 3 months |
Knee flexion and extension resistance training Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load (30% 1RM) |
80 mmHg |
Within 3 months of training, the muscle cross-sectional area and muscle strength were better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The Lysholm score of the observation group was better than that of the control group at 2 months after operation, and there was no significant difference at 3 months. BFRT can improve muscle strength, muscle endurance and knee joint function in the early postoperative period compared with conventional resistance training. |
Su Mingli [32], 2021 |
60 |
After operation, for 6 weeks |
Routine training, straight leg raising, anti-gravity knee extension, resistance isometric contraction, isometric contraction Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load |
80% limb occlusion pressure |
After 6 weeks of intervention, there were significant differences in muscle thickness and thigh circumference between the experimental group and the control group. The Lysholm score of the experimental group was significantly improved compared with the control group (P < 0.05). BFRT can significantly improve knee function after ACLR. |
Huang Wei [33], 2023 |
82 |
After operation, for 6 weeks |
Routine rehabilitation training, straight leg raising, anti-gravity knee extension, resistance to isometric contraction, isometric contraction Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load (30% 1RM) |
75 mmHg |
The Lysholm score of the study group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference of thigh circumference was smaller than that of the control group. The average peak pressure of standing balance, knee bending and squatting in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). BFRT combined with routine rehabilitation training can improve knee joint function, quadriceps function and balance function. |
Zheng Qi [34], 2023 |
40 |
After operation, for 8 weeks |
Routine rehabilitation training, knee flexion and extension muscle resistance training Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load |
70% arterial occlusion pressure was (123 ± 11.23) mmHg |
There was no difference in Lysholm score, flexor and extensor peak torque ratio and extensor peak torque between the two groups before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant after treatment (P < 0.05). Blood flow restriction training can effectively improve the quadriceps strength, knee stability and function of ACLR patients. |
Liu Liping [35], 2023 |
80 |
After operation, for 8 weeks |
Routine rehabilitation nursing, straight leg raising training, knee flexion and extension resistance training Training load: low load |
Control group + BFRT Training load: low load |
50% limb occlusion pressure /104.5*9 cm |
There was no difference between the two groups before the intervention. After the intervention, there were statistically significant differences in Lysholm score, thigh circumference, joint mobility and VAS score. BFRT can significantly improve the postoperative knee function of patients with ACLR, which is of great significance for postoperative rehabilitation. |
![]()
Figure 1. Quadriceps femoris.
Most of the clinical studies used low-load (30% 1RM) BFRT for intervention, and the results showed that it had a statistically significant improvement in the function of the quadriceps femoris, as shown in Figure 1. The intervention of high load (70% 1RM) BFRT showed no statistical significance in improving the strength and volume of quadriceps femoris, which further proved the effectiveness of blood flow restriction combined with low load exercise training. The above studies have shown that conventional low-load training combined with BFR is beneficial to further increase the knee muscle strength and volume of patients after ACLR. The role of low-load BFRT in improving muscle mass of patients after ACLR and the speed of high-load resistance training, but it can better reduce knee pain. The efficacy of BFRT may be related to the occupation, obstruction pressure and individual differences of the subjects. The preoperative or postoperative intervention of BFRT will also have different effects, indicating that the difference in intervention time may be a factor leading to different clinical efficacy.
4. BFRT Security Issues
Since the invention of BFRT, it has been reported that there are side effects such as limb numbness, pain and venous thrombosis, which are mostly related to the unreasonable setting of training parameters. The study found that [36], BFR had no significant effect on the level of muscle injury markers, and short-term low-load BFRT did not cause significant muscle damage. In 2006 and 2016, Japanese scholars carried out two safety surveys on the use of BFRT and found no serious adverse reactions caused by BFRT. In conclusion, there is no direct evidence that BFRT is more risky than traditional training methods. Under the guidance of scientific professionals, BFRT can be safe and effective regardless of the age, gender or physical condition of the subjects.
5. Summary
The decrease of quadriceps muscle strength and muscle atrophy after ACLR are the most common clinical symptoms, which further leads to the decrease of knee joint function and increases the probability of re-injury. Due to the low tolerance of the knee joint with anterior cruciate ligament defect to mechanical stress, it is difficult for patients to carry out high-intensity strength training, which seriously affects the rehabilitation process. Blood flow restriction training is a new treatment technique. During exercise, limiting blood flow at the proximal end of the limb and supplemented by low-intensity strength training can produce a similar effect on muscles to high-intensity resistance training. It has been proven that it can increase the size and strength of muscles around the knee joint and prevent muscle atrophy. In addition, muscle atrophy after ACLR will cause changes in its joint movement pattern, and the wrong force line will aggravate complications such as cartilage wear, while BFRT improves the wrong movement pattern while increasing muscle strength, which is conducive to the recovery of knee joint function. At present, domestic ACLR patients are still mainly based on traditional training, BFRT is still not popular, prospective clinical trials and related reports are insufficient, most of them are small sample studies, lack of sample size, and are still in the exploratory stage. And the best training prescription of BFRT did not get the best parameters. The metabolic stress and mechanical tension caused by the difference of pressure size, aerobic exercise mode and exercise intensity in BFRT were also different, resulting in a certain difference in rehabilitation efficacy. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the different motion patterns during BFRT to determine the optimal combination of mechanical tension and metabolic stress. In the future, large sample experiments are still needed to determine the best parameters and training programs for BFRT in postoperative rehabilitation after ACLR.