Associations between Diabetes Self-Management and Microvascular Complications among Patients Living in Rural Areas, in Kenya

Abstract

Diabetes is a major public health concern worldwide. Low and middle-income countries are the most affected. Diabetes self-management can significantly reduce the burden of diabetes complications and mortality. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the outpatient department of a county referral hospital in Kenya, from 1st August 2022 to 30th October 2022. Patients with known type II diabetes of age ≥ 20 years visiting the hospital for routine follow-up visits were included. A 7-tem Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSAC) Questionnaire was used to assess Diabetes self-care activities. For data entry and statistical analysis, SPSS for Windows version 27.0 was used. There were 96 (39.2%) males and 149 (60.8%) females. Most of the participants were more than 61 years, 148 (60.4%). Significant association was found between the sum scale scores of dietary activities, blood glucose testing, physical activity, foot care, and neuropathy at 95% CI and (p < 0.001). Scores on the Blood glucose testing and foot care activities subscale were significantly associated with Retinopathy (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant associations were found between the presence of nephropathy and dietary activities, foot care, and physical activity subscale (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Diabetes self-management activities have an impact on microvascular complications in patients with diabetes.

Share and Cite:

Ireri, R. , Kikuvi, G. , Mambo, S. and Cheriro, B. (2025) Associations between Diabetes Self-Management and Microvascular Complications among Patients Living in Rural Areas, in Kenya. Open Journal of Epidemiology, 15, 88-101. doi: 10.4236/ojepi.2025.151007.

1. Introduction

Diabetes poses a significant public health challenge worldwide, with its prevalence reaching epidemic levels [1]. Despite global efforts, morbidity and mortality rates associated with diabetes remain alarmingly high. Particularly, low and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear the brunt of this burden. In these regions, diabetes and its complications impose a substantial economic strain, with projected costs only expected to escalate further [2]. Among the many complications linked to diabetes, microvascular issues involving the kidneys, retina, and peripheral nerves stand out as significant contributors to both mortality and disability among patients [3]. This not only adversely impacts their quality of life but also adds to the burden of care. However, it is widely acknowledged that effective self-management strategies for diabetes can play a crucial role in mitigating complications and reducing mortality rates among affected individuals [4].

Contrary to previous assumptions that predominantly linked diabetes prevalence to urban areas, rural communities have also witnessed a surge in cases [3]. This trend places a considerable burden on healthcare workers stationed at primary health centers and dispensaries, given the scarcity of private or tertiary-level hospitals catering to the healthcare needs of diabetic individuals [5]. Intensifying this challenge is various obstacles encountered by these rural communities. These include limited access to diabetes education and clinical services, inadequate smart cellphone coverage and internet accessibility, constrained transportation options, long distances to travel for medical care, and high levels of poverty [6].

The requirements of individuals with diabetes extend beyond maintaining optimal blood sugar levels to also include the prevention of complications and disabilities [7]. Healthcare providers face a significant challenge in meeting the continued needs and expectations of diabetic patients [8]. Regular monitoring and care from a multidisciplinary team are essential for preventing long-term complications associated with diabetes [9] [10]. However, this poses challenges due to the concentration of over 80% of consultants in urban areas and tertiary hospitals in Kenya, resulting in suboptimal management of diabetes and increased rates of diabetes-related complications [11].

Diabetes Self-Management Activities

Self-care in diabetes involves the process of acquiring knowledge and awareness to effectively manage the complexities of diabetes within a social context [12]. The duty for daily diabetes care primarily falls on patients and/or their families. Seven key self-care behaviors have been identified in individuals with diabetes, which are predictive of outcomes. These behaviors encompass maintaining a healthy diet, engaging in regular physical activity, monitoring blood sugar levels, adhering to medication regimens, possessing effective problem-solving abilities, employing healthy coping mechanisms, and adopting risk-reduction practices [13]-[16]. These self-care measures serve as valuable guidelines for healthcare professionals and educators involved in patient care, as well as for researchers evaluating novel approaches to diabetes management [17]. Applying self-reporting methods is a practical and cost-effective strategy for assessing self-management abilities [18].

Diabetes self-management encompasses a range of behaviors adopted by individuals with diabetes to effectively regulate the condition independently. These seven behaviors exhibit a positive association with achieving optimal glycemic control, abating complications, and enhancing overall quality of life [9] [19] [20]. Additionally, it is noted that self-care extends beyond only executing these activities but also emphasizing the interrelation between them. Successful diabetes self-care entails substantial lifestyle adjustments by the patient, reinforced by the supportive involvement of healthcare professionals. This collaborative approach contributes to boosting self-assurance and enables successful behavioral modifications [21]-[24].

Diabetes education holds significant importance, yet its true value lies in its translation into actionable steps or self-care practices for optimal patient benefit. Both the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the World Health Organization underline the necessity for patients to actively engage and acquire knowledge to manage their own health [10] [25]. It is crucial to prioritize understanding the condition and the implication of medication, dietary regimens, foot and eye care, as well as the enduring impact of lifestyle modifications, regular physical activity, and self-monitoring of blood glucose levels [26].

Due to the high occurrence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and its associated complications in Nyeri County, there has been a limited number of studies investigating the self-management of diabetes within its population. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the Diabetes self-management practices of diabetes patients residing in rural areas of Nyeri County, Kenya.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The study was carried out in Nyeri County referral hospital, located in central regional Kenya. The County lies between Mount Kenya and the Aberdare ranges with Agriculture as the main economic activity. The majority of the people living in Nyeri County are predominantly farmers growing tea and coffee as cash crops alongside food crops such as maize, beans, assorted vegetables, and sweet potatoes. Other communities living in the county are mostly engaged in their own businesses or employed by the government. Nyeri County is home to 845,863 people (male 49% and female 51%).

2.2. Study Design

A facility-based, cross-sectional study was conducted at the diabetes clinic and Diabetes outpatient clinic (DOPC). The study duration was from 8th August 2022 till 30th October 2022.

2.3. Sample Size

245 participants were recruited for the study.

2.4. Participant Selection

Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling method. The procedure involved asking about the area of residence among the patients seeking diabetes care and selecting eligible individuals who met the inclusion criteria for participation in the interview. The inclusion criteria were: individuals must be diagnosed with type II diabetes and reside in a rural area within Nyeri County. Other inclusion criteria the participant must be 20 years and above and registered for follow-up in a hospital within Nyeri County. Patients being seen in the emergency or in-patient department, and patients who did not have at least one available record of HbA1c from the last six months were excluded. All patients were included after attaining informed consent. The majority of the participants were under treatment, except two found to have discontinued treatment and medications during the time of the interview.

2.5. Data Collection

Data was collected from the participants using a structured paper-based questionnaire improved from the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure. It included biodata information, Duration of DM and treatment, and HbA1c record from the last six months.

In order to assess their status of self-care, the Summary of Diabetes Self-care Activities (SDSCA) Questionnaire was used. The seven items of SDSCA are used to assess self-care activities. They are divided into 7 subscales: blood glucose testing subscale (item 7, 8, 3A), Diet subscale (item 1, 2, 3, 4, 1A, 5A), Physical exercise subscale (item 5, 6, 2A), smoking subscale (item 11, 12A, 13A, 14A), foot care subscale (item 9, 10, 9A, 10A, 11A), medications subscale (item 6A, 7A, 8A) and self-care recommendations subscale (item 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A). The questionnaire asks patients about their diabetes self-care activities during the past 7 days. If they were sick during the past 7 days, we went back to the last 7 days that they were not sick.

Scoring instructions were. Step 1: For items 1 - 10, use the number of days per week on a scale of 0 - 7. Step 2: Scoring Scales; general Diet = Mean number of days for items 1 and 2 and Specific Diet = Mean number of days for items 3, and 4 where the scale was (0 = 7, 1 = 6, 2 = 5, 3 = 4, 4 = 3, 5 = 2, 6 = 1, 7 = 0); exercise = Mean number of days for items 5 and 6; Blood-Glucose Testing = Mean number of days for items 7 and 8. Foot-Care = Mean number of days for items 9 and 10; Smoking Status = Item 11 (0 = nonsmoker, 1 = smoker), and number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Scoring for Additional Items such as; Recommended regimen = Items 1A - 4A, and items 12A - 14A, no scoring required; Diet = Use total number of days for item 5A; Medications = Use item 6A - OR - 7A AND 8A, use total number of days for item 6A, use mean number of days if both 7A and 8A are applicable. Lastly; Foot-Care = Mean number of days for items 9A - 11A, after reversing 10A and including items 9 and 10.

For data entry and statistical analysis, SPSS for Windows version 27 was utilized. Patient characteristics were presented as frequency and percentages and compared using Chi square test. For SDSCA overall and its subscales mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated and for comparison independent sample t-test was applied. The p value ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant.

2.6. Quality Control

Before commencing data collection, we conducted a pre-test of the questionnaire for consistency and suitability at a non-participating institution, namely Murang’a County Referral Hospital. The reliability of the SDSCA questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha test, yielding an overall reliability coefficient of 0.746. The questionnaire was initially prepared in English, translated into the Kikuyu version, and subsequently translated back into English to ensure accuracy. Data collection involved the participation of four nurses and four clinical officers who were trained a month prior to the study’s commencement. Furthermore, all research assistants underwent a pre-testing session before the actual study. Throughout the data collection process, debriefing meetings were held at the end of each day to review data and identify any potential omissions or errors.

2.7. Data Analysis

The data was entered into Microsoft Excel and subsequent analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22. The reliability of the data was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha test, while model fitness was evaluated using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. Descriptive statistics were computed to provide a summary of most variables. Bivariate analysis was conducted to explore the potential association between diabetes self-management practices and the presence of microvascular complications. To ensure the stability of estimates in the subsequent model, only variables with a p-value less than 0.2 in bivariate analysis were included in the subsequent model analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was then employed to describe the association between diabetes self-management and microvascular complications. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all statistically significant tests.

2.8. Ethics Statement

Both written and verbal informed consent for participation was also obtained from all the participants. For written consent, all participants signed the consent form in the questionnaire. Verbal consent was witnessed by the nurse or clinical officer in-charge of the clinic. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKU/2/4/896B), and the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI/P/22/18990) and Nyeri county department of health (CGN/HEALTH/HRM/6/VOL.II).

2.9. Study Limitations

This study was conducted within a group displaying particular characteristics. It is uncertain whether other groups in different rural areas possess similar traits. Consequently, caution should be exercised when generalizing the findings. However, it does offer insights into the degree of association between diabetes self-management and MVCs, which can guide the development of interventions.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants

A total of two hundred and forty-five (245) individuals diagnosed with Diabetes were involved in the study. Of these, 96 (39.2%) were male and 149 (60.8%) were female. The majority of participants were aged over sixty-one years 148 (60.4%) and married 168 (68.6%). Most of the participants occupation was farming 175 (71.4%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants, Nyeri Rural 2022.

Social demographic Variables

Frequency (%)

Sex

Male

96 (39.2)

Female

149 (60.8)

Age group

20 - 35

12 (4.9)

36 - 45

21 (8.6)

46 - 60

64 (26.1)

61 and above

148 (60.4)

Marital status

Married

168 (68.6)

single

23 (9.4)

Divorced/separated

8 (3.8)

Widowed

46 (18.8)

Level of education

Primary

140 (57.1)

Secondary

64 (26.1)

Tertiary

13 (5.3)

No schooling

28 (11.4)

Occupation

Office job

9 (3.7)

Out door

30 (12.2)

Farmer

175 (71.4)

Stay at home

31 (12.7)

3.2. Heath Status Characteristics of Study Participants

The study result revealed that most 180 (73.5%) respondents had no family history of diabetes. Most 232 (94.7%) of the respondents were non-smokers. More than two-thirds of the respondents (69%) have experienced diseases more significant than five years of duration. Of the total respondents more than half, 144 (58.8%) had poor glycemic control (Table 2).

Table 2. Health status characteristics of study participants, Nyeri Rural 2022.

Variables

Frequency (%)

Family history of diabetes

Yes

65 (26.5)

No

180 (73.5)

Cigarette smoking

Yes

13 (5.3)

No

232 (94.7)

Duration of diabetes

Less than 5 years

76 (31.0)

5 - 10 years

89 (36.3)

More than 10 years

80 (32.7)

Diabetes treatment regimen

Oral Hypoglycemics

165 (67.3)

Insulin

24 (9.8)

Insulin plus oral hypoglycemics

56 (22.9)

HbIaC Levels

Good Control

101 (41.2)

Poor control

144 (58.8)

3.3. Factors Associated with Diabetes Microvascular Complications

The prevalence of Diabetes microvascular complications among the participants was found to be 56.78%, 25.3%, and 14.7% for neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy, respectively. Univariate and bivariate analysis revealed a significant association between age and level of education with all three microvascular complications. Additionally, marital status showed an association with nephropathy and neuropathy, while Hb1Ac levels were associated with nephropathy (Table 3).

3.4. Associations between Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities and the Diabetes Microvascular Complications

As indicated in Table 2, multiple regression analysis indicated a significant association between the sum scale scores of dietary activities, blood glucose testing, physical activity, foot care, and neuropathy at a 95% CI, with a p-value (p < 0.001). Furthermore, scores on the subscales for blood glucose testing and foot care activities were significantly correlated with retinopathy (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant correlations were identified between the presence of nephropathy and the subscales for dietary activities, foot care, and physical activity (p < 0.001), as detailed in (Table 4).

Table 3. Factors associated with Diabetes Microvascular complications, Nyeri Rural 2022.

Characteristic variable

Total (n = 245)

Neuropathy

p-value

Retinopathy

p-value

Nephropathy

p-value

Age

20 - 35

12

1 (0.7)

0.001

0 (0%)

0.009

2 (5.6%)

0.02

36 - 45

21

7 (5.0%)

3 (4.8%)

1 (2.8%)

46 - 60

64

27 (19.4)

11 (17.7%)

3 (8.3%)

61 and above

148

104 (74.8)

48 (77.4%)

30 (83.3%)

Marital status

Single

23

7 (5.0%)

0.003

3 (4.8%)

0.08

2 (5.6%)

0.007

Married

168

93 (66.9%)

39 (62.9%)

20 (55.6%)

Divorced/Separated

8

4 (2.9%)

2 (3.2%)

0 (0%)

Widowed

46

35 (25.2%)

18 (29.0%)

14 (38.9%)

Level of Education

Primary

140

83 (59.7%)

0.003

39 (62.9%)

0.003

19 (52.8%)

0.008

Secondary

64

28 (20.1%)

7 (11.3%)

6 (16.7%)

Tertiary

13

5 (3.6%)

3 (4.8%)

1 (2.8%)

No schooling

28

23 (16.1%)

13 (21.0%)

10 (27.8%)

Occupation

Office job

9

3 (2.2%)

0.17

3 (4.8%)

0.13

0 (0%)

0.06

Outdoor job

30

13 (19.4%)

4 (6.5%)

5 (13.9%)

Farmer

175

104 (74.8%)

43 (69.4%)

22 (61.1%)

Stay at home

31

19 (13.7%)

12 (19.4%)

9 (25.0%)

Duration of diabetes

Below 5 years

76

35 (25.2%)

0.05

19 (30.6%)

0.26

8 (22.2%)

0.44

5 - 10 years

89

52 (37.4%)

18 (29.1%)

14 (38.9%)

More than 10 years

80

52 (37.4%)

25 (40.3%)

14 (38.9%)

Diabetes treatment regimen

Oral Hypoglycemics

165

96 (69.1%)

0.73

41 (66.1%)

0.90

21 (58.3%)

0.27

Insulin

24

12 (8.6%)

7 (11.3%)

6 (16.7%)

Insulin plus oral hypoglycemics

56

31 (22.3%)

14 (22.6%)

9 (25.0%)

Hb1aC level

Good control

101

56 (40.3%)

0.73

21 (33.9%)

0.17

8 (22.2%)

0.01

Poor Control

144

83 (59.7%)

41 (66.1%)

28 (77.8%)

Values are presented as number (%) and P value for associations.

Table 4. Associations between summary of diabetes self-care activities and the microvascular complications of diabetes, nyeri rural 2022.

SDSAC Variable

Total (n = 245) mean and SD

Neuropathy

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Retinopathy

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Nephropathy

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Dietary Practice

4.44 ± 1.51

0.07 (0.03 - 0.11)

<0.001*

0.04 (−0.001 - 0.07)

0.06

0.06 (0.03 - 0.08)

<0.001*

Blood glucose monitoring

1.52 ± 2.15

0.06 (0.03 - 0.09)

<0.001*

0.03 (0.02 - 0.07)

<0.001*

−0.003 (−0.02 - 0.02)

0.76

Physical Activity

2.39 ± 1.86

0.06 (0.03 - 0.09)

<0.001*

0.03 (0.003 - 0.06)

0.08

0.05 (0.03 - 0.08)

<0.001*

Foot care

4.99 ± 1.63

0.08 (0.02 - 0.09)

<0.001*

0.06 (0.02 - 0.09)

<0.001*

0.06 (0.03 - 0.08)

<0.001*

DM Medication Adherence

7.28 ± 1.55

−0.02 (−0.07 - 0.02)

0.29

0.01 (−0.03 - 0.05)

0.55

0.007 (0.02 - 0.04

0.62

SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. *p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to assess the association between diabetes self-care practices and the occurrence of microvascular complications in diabetic patients residing in rural areas. Among the study participants, the prevalence rates of diabetes microvascular complications were found to be 56.78% for neuropathy, 25.3% for retinopathy, and 14.7% for nephropathy. These figures are remarkably higher compared to findings from other studies [27] [28]. It is worth noting that our study primarily focused on individuals residing in rural areas, in contrast to previous studies. This difference in results may be attributed to the unique challenges and disparities in diabetes care experienced by rural populations [29].

In this study, participants were stratified based on various demographic factors. Results showed that individuals aged sixty-one years or older had a higher prevalence of Neuropathy and Retinopathy compared to their younger counterparts (p < 0.05). This observation aligns with prior research suggesting that advancing age is a significant risk factor for prediabetes and diabetes [29]. Moreover, microvascular complications are more prevalent among diabetic populations, with the risk of such events often correlated with the duration of diabetes [30].

The educational level was related to all the MVCs. This study agrees with previous studies indicating that educational achievement affects awareness of diabetes self-care, adherence to medication, and an individual's health-seeking behavior [31]. Other studies have noted that individuals with lower levels of education are at a higher risk of developing complications related to diabetes [32].

The current research revealed a remarkable association between dietary habits, physical activity, and the occurrence of neuropathy and nephropathy complications. This linkage can be explained by the consistent adoption of a healthy dietary regimen, which has been linked to a decreased likelihood of microvascular complications among diabetic patients. Additionally, we examined the distribution of carbohydrate intake and consumption of fats. Previous studies have indicated that diets rich in carbohydrates and monounsaturated fats contribute to enhanced insulin sensitivity [33]-[35]. These findings provide a foundation for dietary guidelines designed to mitigate the risk of diabetic microvascular complications.

Engaging in various forms of physical activity, including walking, gardening, leisure activities, exercise, and occupational movements, has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity. Moreover, it contributes to improvements in lipid profile, BMI, and blood pressure. These findings align with previous findings indicating that physical activity promotes better glycemic control and overall disease management [36]-[38].

Foot care practices were found to have a significant association with all three microvascular complications. Previous research has also indicated that individuals with peripheral neuropathy are at higher risk of developing diabetic retinopathy (DR), macroalbuminuria, and macrovascular complications [39]-[41]. These findings suggest that neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy are indicative of a broader diabetic microangiopathic process, the progression of which may be affected by factors beyond diabetes duration and metabolic control. Therefore, interventions aimed at preventing one microvascular complication may have a direct impact on preventing similar complications [42] [43].

The results indicate a correlation between blood glucose testing and neuropathy and retinopathy in this study align with preceding research. Blood glucose monitoring plays a critical role in the management of individuals with diabetes [44]. It helps to recognize patterns in the fluctuation of blood glucose levels that occur in response to diet, exercise, medications, and pathological processes [45] [46]. It supports improvement of patient outcomes because critical decisions can be made in time.

5. Conclusion

The present research demonstrates a direct association between diabetes-related self-care behaviors and the occurrence of diabetes microvascular complications (MVCs). Specifically, activities such as foot care, dietary habits, physical exercise, and blood glucose monitoring, as well as demographic factors like age, marital status, Hb1Ac levels, and educational attainment, were found to be significantly linked to MVCs among diabetic patients. These findings highlight the importance of promoting diabetes self-care education as a vital strategy for enhancing self-management practices and ultimately improving patient outcomes in diabetes management.

Acknowledgements

A preprint has previously been published [47].

We extend our heartfelt appreciation to the staff at the Diabetic Clinic and the authorities of Nyeri County Referral Hospital for their invaluable support throughout the duration of the study.

Financial Obligation

No funding was obtained for this research.

Authors’ Contributions

Rachael Ireri contributed to the conception of the research idea, design data analysis and interpretation, paper drafting and revision. Gideon Kikuvi contributed to the conception of the research idea, design and revision of the final draft. Susan Mambo contributed to the conception of the research idea, design, and revision of final draft. Besty Cheriro contributed to the conception of the research idea, design, and revision of final draft. All authors approved the final manuscript before publication and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Mathur, P., Leburu, S. and Kulothungan, V. (2022) Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment and Control of Diabetes in India from the Countrywide National NCD Monitoring Survey. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 748157.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Sun, H., Saeedi, P., Karuranga, S., Pinkepank, M., Ogurtsova, K., Duncan, B.B., et al. (2022) IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, Regional and Country-Level Diabetes Prevalence Estimates for 2021 and Projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 183, Article 109119.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Marsh, Z., Teegala, Y. and Cotter, V. (2022) Improving Diabetes Care of Community-Dwelling Underserved Older Adults. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 34, 1156-1166.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Tang, J., Wu, T., Hu, X. and Gao, L. (2021) Self-Care Activities among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 27, e12987.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Alanazi, M. (2021) Determinants of Successful Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors among Women of Arab Descent with Type 2 Diabetes. Primary Care Diabetes, 15, 306-313.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Ary, D.V., Toobert, D., Wilson, W. and Glasgow, R.E. (1986) Patient Perspective on Factors Contributing to Nonadherence to Diabetes Regimen. Diabetes Care, 9, 168-172.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Shrivastava, S.R., Shrivastava, P.S. and Ramasamy, J. (2013) Role of Self-Care in Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 12, Article No. 14.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Lin, K., Yang, X., Yin, G. and Lin, S. (2015) Diabetes Self-Care Activities and Health-Related Quality-of-Life of Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Shantou, China. Journal of International Medical Research, 44, 147-156.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Aquino, J.A., Baldoni, N.R., Flôr, C.R., Sanches, C., Di Lorenzo Oliveira, C., Alves, G.C.S., et al. (2018) Effectiveness of Individual Strategies for the Empowerment of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Primary Care Diabetes, 12, 97-110.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Aronson, R., Brown, R.E., Jiandani, D., Walker, A., Orzech, N. and Mbuagbaw, L. (2018) Assessment of Self-Management in Patients with Diabetes Using the Novel LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 137, 128-136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Afaya, R.A., Bam, V., Lomotey, A.Y. and Afaya, A. (2022) Clinical Factors Influencing Knowledge and Self-Care Practice among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nursing Open, 10, 2492-2500.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Khosravizadeh, O., Ahadinezhad, B., Maleki, A., Yousefy, S. and Momeni, Z. (2023) Diabetes Self-Care Activities among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries, 44, 10-19.[CrossRef]
[13] Eva, J.J., Kassab, Y.W., Neoh, C.F., Ming, L.C., Wong, Y.Y., Abdul Hameed, M., et al. (2018) Self-Care and Self-Management among Adolescent T2DM Patients: A Review. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9, Article 489.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Maina, P.M., Pienaar, M. and Reid, M. (2023) Self-Management Practices for Preventing Complications of Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 5, Article 100136.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Young-Hyman, D., de Groot, M., Hill-Briggs, F., Gonzalez, J.S., Hood, K. and Peyrot, M. (2016) Psychosocial Care for People with Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 39, 2126-2140.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Toobert, D.J., Hampson, S.E. and Glasgow, R.E. (2000) The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure: Results from 7 Studies and a Revised Scale. Diabetes Care, 23, 943-950.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Llera-Fábregas, A., Pérez-Ríos, N., Camacho-Monclova, D.M., Ramirez-Vick, M. and Andriankaja, O.M. (2022) Diabetes Self-Care Activities and Perception and Glycemic Control in Adult Puerto Rican Residents with Type 2 Diabetes: The LLIPDS Study. Journal of Public Health Research, 11, 1-12.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Lee, J., Lee, E., Chae, D. and Kim, C. (2020) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes Self-Care: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 105, Article 103498.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Chew, B., Vos, R.C., Pouwer, F. and Rutten, G.E.H.M. (2018) The Associations between Diabetes Distress and Self-Efficacy, Medication Adherence, Self-Care Activities and Disease Control Depend on the Way Diabetes Distress Is Measured: Comparing the DDS-17, DDS-2 and the Paid-5. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 142, 74-84.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Pintaudi, B., Lucisano, G., Gentile, S., Bulotta, A., Skovlund, S.E., Vespasiani, G., et al. (2015) Correlates of Diabetes-Related Distress in Type 2 Diabetes: Findings from the Benchmarking Network for Clinical and Humanistic Outcomes in Diabetes (BENCH-D) Study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 79, 348-354.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kim, S., Love, F., Quistberg, D.A. and Shea, J.A. (2004) Association of Health Literacy with Self-Management Behavior in Patients with Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 27, 2980-2982.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Bloomgarden, Z. and Gouller, A. (2004) Prevention of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes. In: Principles of Diabetes Mellitus, Springer, 619-638.[CrossRef]
[23] Salmerón, J., Hu, F.B., Manson, J.E., Stampfer, M.J., Colditz, G.A., Rimm, E.B., et al. (2001) Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73, 1019-1026.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Marshall, J.A. and Bessesen, D.H. (2002) Dietary Fat and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 25, 620-622.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Glasgow, R.E. and Osteen, V.L. (1992) Evaluating Diabetes Education: Are We Measuring the Most Important Outcomes? Diabetes Care, 15, 1423-1432.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Glasgow, R.E., Fisher, E.B., Anderson, B.J., LaGreca, A., Marrero, D., Johnson, S.B., et al. (1999) Behavioral Science in Diabetes. Contributions and Opportunities. Diabetes Care, 22, 832-843.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Govindarajan Venguidesvarane, A., Jasmine, A., Varadarajan, S., Shriraam, V., Muthuthandavan, A.R., Durai, V., et al. (2020) Prevalence of Vascular Complications among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in a Rural Health Center in South India. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 11, Article 2150132720959962.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Pelluri, R., Srikanth, K., Chimakurthy, J. and Nagasubramanian, V.R. (2021) Microvascular Complications and Their Associated Risk Factors among Rural Type 2 Diabetic Population: A Cross-Sectional Study. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 3, 625-631.[CrossRef]
[29] Yan, Z., Cai, M., Han, X., Chen, Q. and Lu, H. (2023) The Interaction between Age and Risk Factors for Diabetes and Prediabetes: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, 16, 85-93.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Singh, V.P., Bali, A., Singh, N. and Jaggi, A.S. (2014) Advanced Glycation End Products and Diabetic Complications. The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology, 18, Article No. 1.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Garg, R., Chawla, S.S., Kaur, S., Bharti, A., Kaur, M., Soin, D., et al. (2019) Impact of Health Education on Knowledge, Attitude, Practices and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8, 261-268.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Hwang, Y., Lee, D. and Kim, Y.S. (2020) Educational Needs Associated with the Level of Complication and Comparative Risk Perceptions in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 11, 170-176.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Ghaemi, F., Firouzabadi, F.D., Moosaie, F., Shadnoush, M., Poopak, A., Kermanchi, J., et al. (2021) Effects of a Mediterranean Diet on the Development of Diabetic Complications: A Longitudinal Study from the Nationwide Diabetes Report of the National Program for Prevention and Control of Diabetes (NPPCD 2016-2020). Maturitas, 153, 61-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Rydall, A.C., Rodin, G.M., Olmsted, M.P., Devenyi, R.G. and Daneman, D. (1997) Disordered Eating Behavior and Microvascular Complications in Young Women with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 1849-1854.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Chudasama, Y.V. and Khunti, K. (2023) Healthy Lifestyle Choices and Microvascular Complications: New Insights into Diabetes Management. PLOS Medicine, 20, e1004152.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Zhu, X., Zhang, X., Zhou, C., Li, B., Huang, Y., Li, C., et al. (2023) Walking Pace and Microvascular Complications among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study from the UK Biobank. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 34, e14501.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Makura, C.B., Nirantharakumar, K., Girling, A.J., Saravanan, P. and Narendran, P. (2013) Effects of Physical Activity on the Development and Progression of Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes: Retrospective Analysis of the DCCT Study. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 13, Article No. 37.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Blomster, J.I., Chow, C.K., Zoungas, S., Woodward, M., Patel, A., Poulter, N.R., et al. (2013) The Influence of Physical Activity on Vascular Complications and Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 15, 1008-1012.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Vithian, K. and Hurel, S. (2010) Microvascular Complications: Pathophysiology and Management. Clinical Medicine, 10, 505-509.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Mansour, A., Mousa, M., Abdelmannan, D., Tay, G., Hassoun, A. and Alsafar, H. (2023) Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Exome Wide Association Analyses. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14, Article 1143067.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Tuomilehto, J., Schwarz, P. and Lindström, J. (2011) Long-Term Benefits from Lifestyle Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention. Diabetes Care, 34, S210-S214.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Geng, T., Zhu, K., Lu, Q., Wan, Z., Chen, X., Liu, L., et al. (2023) Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors, Mediating Biomarkers, and Risk of Microvascular Complications among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study. PLOS Medicine, 20, e1004135.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Zhang, Y., Pan, X., Chen, J., Xia, L., Cao, A., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019) Combined Lifestyle Factors and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes and Prognosis among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Diabetologia, 63, 21-33.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Turner, R. (1998) Intensive Blood-Glucose Control with Sulphonylureas or Insulin Compared with Conventional Treatment and Risk of Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (UKPDS 33). The Lancet, 352, 837-853.
[45] Dahl-Jorgensen, K., Brinchmann-Hansen, O., Hanssen, K.F., Sandvik, L. and Aagenaes, O. (1985) Rapid Tightening of Blood Glucose Control Leads to Transient Deterioration of Retinopathy in Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Oslo Study. British Medical Journal, 290, 811-815.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Stratton, I.M. (2000) Association of Glycaemia with Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective Observational Study. British Medical Journal, 321, 405-412.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.02.16.24302931v1.full

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.