Phenotypic Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections at the Protestant Hospital of Ngaoundere (Cameroon)

Abstract

Aims and objectives: The frequent and unprescribed use of antibiotics has led to the development of resistance by microorganisms responsible for urinary tract infection (UTI). In order to facilitate the follow-up of this microbial resistance, the aim of this study was to determine the bacteria resistant phenotypes. Method: To achieve the following objectives, this study was conducted from June to August 2023. The isolation and identification were performed by standard methods why susceptibility testing was done by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique according to CLSI guidelines. Double-disk synergy test was applied to determine the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) produced by bacteria. The Imipenem EDTA Combined Disc Test (CDT) for Metallo beta lactamase (MBL) screening, the D-zone test to detect macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins type B (MLSB) and Meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRS A) which was assessed using a Cefoxitin (30 µg) disc. Results: A total of 40 bacteria were identified with a prevalence of 37.03%. Overall, E. coli was the predominant isolate 14 (35%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus 10 (25%) and Klesbsiella pneumonia 4 (10%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella arinosa and Enterobacter were the most sensible (100%) bacteria against ciprofloxin, ceftriaxone and cefixime. Almost all bacteria were resistant to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (>50%). The isolates were in the majority resistant to imipenem. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae represented 25.92%, with a higher rate among E. coli. No MBL production was found among the isolates while 38.46% represented cMLSB, 15.38% represented iMLSB, 23.07% represented MSB and 23.07% represented MRSA. Conclusion: Clinical strains of UTI from Protestant Hospital of Ngaoundere exhibiting ESBL, cMLSB, iMLSB, MSB and MRSA. The regular updating of antibiotic resistance statistics of isolated strains allows for a better adaptation of probabilistic antibiotic therapy.

Share and Cite:

Talom, B.T., Moniratou, B., Fodouop, S.P.C., Fokam, M.A.T., Meffo, C.S.D., Eguen, Z.I. and Kuiate, J.-R. (2025) Phenotypic Resistance of Bacteria Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections at the Protestant Hospital of Ngaoundere (Cameroon). Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 13, 243-254. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2025.131020.

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequent in human and are a very common cause of consultation and medical prescription in everyday practice. The infection can affect several parts of the urinary system, but the most common type is a bladder infection (cystitis). Kidney infections (pyelonephritis) are another type of UTI, less common but more serious than bladder infections [1] [2].

Worldwide, UTIs’ prevalence is estimated at around 150 million people per year [3]. In 2019, more than 404.6 million had UTIs globally and nearly 236,786 people died of UTIs. At the Global Burden of Disease regional level, the highest age-standardised incidence rate in 2019 occurred in Tropical Latin America (13852.9 per 100,000 population) [4]. The prevalence of UTIs in Africa varies from country to country and geographical location. For instance, the prevalence rate is 15.9% in Ghana, 4.5% in Senegal, and 12.3% in Nigeria. On average, the overall prevalence of UTIs in the nine countries of sub-Saharan Africa was 32.12% [5]. In Cameroon, uropathogens were recovered from 137 (58.3%) specimens, with prevalence rates in Buea and Bamenda being 65.9% and 54% respectively [6].

The risk factors for urinary tract infection vary with country and geographical location. Personal hygiene, prostate problems, compromised immunity, sex, diabetes, and use of spermicidal contraception are some of the risk factors for UTIs [7]. UTIs are more common in women than in men [8]. UTIs involve a wide range of clinical manifestations, including acute, chronic, uncomplicated, complicated, asymptomatic, symptomatic and recurrent [9]. The microbial agents most frequently involved have a digestive origin, such as enterobacteria (E. coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumonia, Enterobacter cloacae, etc.) and Enterococci [10].

Moreover, the overusing of antibiotic therapy has contributed to the emergence of bacterial infections resistance. According to these facts, the high administration of antibiotics in and outside hospital without precautions has a major socioeconomic impact and is responsible for the increasing cases of antibiotic resistance in nowadays population [11].

Antibiotic susceptibility test is mandatory to be known, in order to ensure appropriate therapy according to the organisms that cause UTIs. Therefore, it is recommended for physicians to acknowledge more information about local susceptibility pattern of uropathogens. In Cameroon, Ngaoundere, to our knowledge, due to the lack of multi-resistant bacteria surveillance, the extent of circulating bacteria resistant strains (phenotypes) is unknown, thus the reason for this study. This study is part of a research work, conducted by Department of Biomedical Sciences and it is of epidemiological, theurapeutic and etiological diagnostic interest.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Sampling

Patients admitted to the Protestant Hospital of Ngaoundere with UTIs and antibiogram were included. Before inclusion in the study, an informed consent was signed by all participants. This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2023 to August 2023. Sociodemographic data for these patients were recorded based on the documented of clinical diagnostics in their medical files. Sampling was performed during the study periods from patient who did not receive antimicrobial drugs at least seven days. Urine samples were collected at morning before first urination or 4 hours after a last miction. The urine sample were immediately transferred to the microbiology laboratory in the Protestant Hospital of Ngaoundere.

2.2. Bacterial Culture and Characterization

The samples were processed according to the standard procedures and germs were identified according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (CA-SFM/EUCAST) [12]. In brief, specimens were inoculated to medium (Cled) plate and incubated at 37˚C for 18 H to 24 H. Microscopical examination of Gram-stained smears confirmed. Bacterial colonies were subjected to biochemical reaction (oxidase, catalase, API 20E). Susceptibility of isolated bacteria to various classes of antibiotics was determined on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, using commercial disks according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [13]. The isolates germs were determined against Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefuroxime, cefixime, imipenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), Tobamycin (10 µg), Erythromycin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Norfloxacin (30 µg), Nitrofurantoin (50 µg).

2.3. Determination of Resistant Mechanisms of Germs (Phenotypes) Responsible Against Antibiotics

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates was done by the standard Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, using commercial disks according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). When pure culture was obtained, a loopful of bacteria was then taken from a colony and transferred to a tube containing 5 mL of sterile distilled water and mixed gently until it formed a homogenous suspension. Then, the turbidity of the suspension was adjusted to the density of a McFarland 0.5 (Mary-l’Etoil, year) in order to standardize the inoculum size [14] [15].

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer’s disk diffusion method on Muller-Hinton agar whereby 50 µl of bacterium suspension prepared above was poured on to the surface of the agar. A swab was then used to distribute the bacteria evenly over the entire surface of Mueller-Hinton agar and the surface was allowed to dry for about 5 minutes before placing antibiotic disc. Individual antibiotic dispensers were placed onto the surface of the agar using a pair of sterile forceps and the latter was then incubated upside down for 24 hours at 37˚C.

Antibiotic disks used are selected in relation to the frequent treatment used by the clinicians and pharmaceutical presentation depends on the age of the patients. The antibiogram was interpreted based on CLSI guidelines as follows. The results were reported as sensitive and resistant.

2.4 Determination of the Resistant Phenotypic Profiles

2.4.1. Screening of β-Lactamases Enzymes

1) Screening of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) enzyme

Double-disk synergy test was applied to determine the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production. Chances of ESBL enzyme screening were carried out if we observed any resistance in ceftazidime (caz ≤ 22 mm), or cefotaxime (ctx ≤ 27 mm) and cefodoxime ≤ 17 mm, ceftriazone (all third generation cephalosporins). A susceptibility disk containing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was placed at the center of the plate, and disks containing ceftazidime (30 µg) was placed 30 mm from the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 µg) disk. ESBL producing isolate was indicated by an extension of the inhibition zone of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disk that is ≥5 mm than that of ceftazidime after 48 hours incubation at 37˚C aerobically and the result was noted [16].

2) Imipenem EDTA Combined disc test (CDT) for Metallo-betalactamase (MBL)

If any isolates from the antibiogram yielded a resistance in Imipenem or Ceftazidine or Meropenem, we proceeded to test for MBL production. An exactly 0.5 McFarland suspension of the pure bacteria culture was inoculated on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plate and then two imipenem (10 µg) and imipenem (10 µg) plus EDTA (20 µl of 0.1 M) disks was placed at distance of 25 mm apart and incubate the plate overnight at 37˚C. If the zone of inhibition (ZOI) of imipenem (10 µg) plus EDTA (20 µl) disks was greater than or equal to 5 mm than that of imipenem (10 µg), then the organism is an MBL producer [17].

2.4.2. Meticillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

An exact 0.5 McFarland suspension of the pure bacteria culture was inoculated on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plate and cefoxitin (10 µg) disks was placed and the plate incubate overnight at 37˚C. If zone of inhibition (ZOI) of Cefoxitin was less than or equal to 21 mm, the isolate was a Meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain (https://universe84a.com/collection/beta-lactamases/).

2.4.3. D-Zone Test (Erythromycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (cMLSB, iMLSB and MS Strains)

For detecting erythromycin and clindamycin resistance, 15 μg erythromycin disks and 2 μg clindamycin disks were used. Interpretation of the diameters of zones of inhibition was as follows: for erythromycin = 23 mm; S, 14 - 22 mm; I, = 13 mm; R, and for clindamycin = 21 mm; S, 15 - 20 mm; I, = 14 mm; R. Intermediate resistant strains were considered resistant. Erythromycin-resistant S. aureus strains were selected for further studies [5]. D-testing was performed for erythromycin-resistant S. aureus strains according to the guidelines of the CLSI. Suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland of each freshly cultured isolate in sterile distilled water was prepared and used for inoculation of Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Erythromycin and clindamycin disks were placed on inoculated plates 15 mm apart (edge-to-edge). Plates were read after 18 h - 24 h incubation at 35˚C and the shape of the clindamycin zone was verified. Strains resistant to both antibiotics were considered to have cMLSB resistance. Strains with flattening of the susceptible zone of inhibition to clindamycin adjacent to the erythromycin disk (D-shape) were considered to contain iMLSB-resistance, while strains with circular zones were considered to contain MS resistance [18].

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients

Overall, 108 patient’s urine samples were included in the current study. It shows that out of the 108, 30.56% (33) consisted of males while 69.44% (75) were females, a sex ratio of 2:27 in favour of the females (Table 1). The overall prevalence of UTI infection is 37.03%. Of them 23 (57.5%) females and 17 (42.5%) males were infected.

Table 1. Age and gender distribution in acquired UTI patients.

Gender

Age groups

20;

n (%)

[20 - 40];

n (%)

[40 - 60];

n (%)

60;

n (%)

Total;

n (%)

Male

13 (12.04)

8 (7.41)

8 (7.41)

4 (3.70)

33 (30.56)

Female

6 (5.55)

61 (56.48)

8 (7.41)

0 (0)

75 (69.44)

Total

19 (17.59)

69 (63.89)

16 (14.82)

4 (3.70)

108 (100)

Positive cases

Male

11

3

0

3

15.74%

Female

1

20

0

2

21.29%

Positive case

12

23

0

5

40 (37.03)

3.2. Bacterial Isolates

In our study, E. coli was the most encountered Enterobacteriae with 35% (14/40) followed by K. pneumoniae, 10% (4/40), while S. aureus on the other hand was the most encountered Gram-positive cocci, 25% (10) as shown in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Prevalence of each isolate obtained.

Isolate germs

N˚ of isolates

N˚ (%)

Escherichia coli

14

35

Staphylococcus aureus

10

25

Klebsiella pneumoniae

4

10

Salmonella arizona

1

2.5

Pseudomonas

1

2.5

Enterobacter cloacae

1

2.5

Neisseria gonorrhoeae

3

7.5

Other gram negative rods

6

15

Total

40

100

3.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Most bacterial isolates were found resistant to imipenem (72.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 57.5%, ceftazidime (45%) but maximum sensitive to tobramycin (82.5%), ciprofloxacin (7.5%), cefixime (12.5%), cefuroxime (12.5%). Table 3 shows the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the all-bacterial isolates in this study. E. coli yielded a higher resistance rate for Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (57.1%), ceftazidime (50.7%), and imipenem (71.4%) among K. pneumoniae more than 50% resistance was seen to gentamycin (75%), imipenem (100%), Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (75%), ceftazidime (50%). S. aureus yielded a higher resistant rate to imipenem (100%) followed by erythromycin (70%) and azithromycin (50%).

Table 3. Antimicrobial resistant rates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 30) and Staphylococcus (n = 10) collected from clinical urine specimens of patients.

Organisms

Antibiotics

E. coli

(n = 14)

K. pneumoniae

(n = 4)

Staphylococcus aureus

(n = 10)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

(n = 1)

Salmonella arizona

(n = 1)

Enterobacter cloacae

(n = 1)

Neissera gonorrhoeae

(n = 3)

Other gram negative rods

(n = 6)

Overall resistance

Augmentin

57.1 (8)

75 (3)

40 (4)

100 (1)

100 (1)

100 (1)

66.7 (2)

50 (3)

57.5 (23)

Ceftazidime

50 (7)

75 (3)

30 (3)

100 (1)

0

0

66.7 (2)

33.3 (2)

45 (18)

Cefepime

7.1 (1)

0

20 (2)

100 (1)

0

0

0

66.7 (4)

20 (8)

Ceftriazone

4.9 (6)

25 (1)

10 (1)

0

0

100 (1)

0

__

22.5 (9)

Cefixime

21.4 (3)

50 (2)

20 (2)

0

0

0

33.3 (1)

__

12.5 (5)

Cefuroxime

7.1 (1)

25 (1)

10 (1)

100 (1)

100 (1)

0

0

16.7 (1)

12.5 (5)

Cefotaxime

21.4 (3)

50 (2)

10 (1)

100 (1)

__

0

0

__

17.5 (7)

Erythromycin

14.3 (2)

__

70 (7)

__

__

100 (1)

33.3 (1)

__

27.5 (11)

Azithromycin

21.4 (3)

0

50 (5)

__

0

0

0

__

20 (8)

Norfloxacin

0

0

40 (4)

0

__

__

0

__

10 (4)

Ciprofloxacin

21.4 (3)

0

0

0

0

0

0

__

7.5 (3)

Imipenem

71.4 (10)

100 (4)

100 (10)

100 (1)

100 (1)

100 (1)

66.7 (2)

__

72.5 (29)

Tobamycin

14.3 (2)

__

__

__

__

__

33.3 (1)

__

7.5 (3)

Gentamicin

14.3 (2)

75 (3)

0

100 (1)

__

0

__

__

15 (6)

3.4. ESBL and MBL β Lactamases Production

Out of 27 Enterobacteriaceae screened for ESBL production, 25.92% (7) were positive indicated by an extended of the zone of inhibition ≥ 5 mm of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid than ceftazidine. The highest frequency of ESBL enzymes was found among K. pneumoniae isolates (50%) (Table 4).

Table 4. Frequency of ESBL, MBL among Enterobacteriaceae members detected by DDST and imipenem EDTA combined disc test (CDT) phenotypic laboratory methods. E. coli presented the most ESBL phenotypes (57%), followed by K. pneumoniae (29%) and (14%) then other gram-negative rods.

Isolats

N˚ of isolates with ESBL

ESBL (%)

N˚ of isolates with MBL

MBL (%)

overall phenotype %

E. coli

4 (4/14)

28.57

0

0

57.14

K. pneumoniae

2 (2/4)

50

0

0

28.57

Other Gram-negative rods

1 (1/9)

16.67

0

0

14.28

TOTAL

7 (7/27)

25.92

0

0

99.99

ESBL: Extended spectrum beta lactamase MBL: Metallo beta lactamase.

3.5. MRSA and MLSB Production

Among the 10 Staphylococcus aureus isolate tested, 23.07% (3/10 strains) expressed the MRSA strain, with a ZOI ≤ 21 mm of Cefoxitin. For the D-test, 38.46% (5/10 strains) were found to exhibit the constitutive MLSB resistance, and 15.38% (2/10 strains) the inducible MLSB resistance, while 23.076% (3/10) expressed the MSB resistance (Table 5).

Table 5. Frequency of iMLSB, cMLSB, MSB and MRSA in Staphylococcus aureus detected by different phenotypic laboratory methods.

Tests

Phenotypes

No. of strains with resistance phenotype

No. (%)

D-TEST

cMLSB

5

50

iMLSB

2

20

MSB

3

30

MRSA test

MRSA

7

70

D-test: disk-test; iMLSB: Induicible Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B; cMLSB: Constitutive Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B; MSB: Macrolide Streptogramin B; MRSA: Meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

4. Discussion

In this research, 108 samples of urines were collected. Among these, 40 (37.03%) bacteria were isolated. This result is slightly similar to the one obtained in Nigeria (22%) [18]. The female gender (57.5%) was the most affected by UTIs than the male gender (42.5%). This can be due to the women’s genital urinary anatomy, particularly the short urethra with proximity to the perianal area, which increases the chances of UTIs more than it is in men [19]. The vast majority of germs belonged to E. coli at 35%, K. pneumoniae 10%, S. aureus 25%.

The epidemiological profile of bacteria varies from one region to another. Therefore, knowledge of the local epidemiology and its evolution remains essential for the choice of an effective first-line antibiotic therapy adapted to each locality. The results of our study highlighted an involvement of E. coli strains (35%) in enterobacteria UTIs. This is clearly justified by the high prevalence of E. coli in these infections.

The study of antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic bacterial strains has highlighted variable resistance rates to the antibiotics tested, particularly to the main molecules used in the treatment of UTIs. The resistance rate was high to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (57.5%) and Ceftazidime (45%). A similar resistance rate was noted at Garoua [20] and Madagascar [21]. Even higher rates of resistance to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, up to 92%, have been reported by other studies [22]. These high resistance rates of enterobacteria justify that these β lactams are no longer recommended in probalistic treatment. The acquisition of resistance to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, a very widely used antibiotic in Cameroon, is a global phenomenon reported at very variable rates. In our study, the resistance of E. coli to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is 57.1% compared to 82.4% in India [23].

The mechanism of acquired resistance to B-lactams is enzymatic in nature by production of broad-spectrum B-lactamases. The involvement of enterobacteria producing broad-spectrum B-lactamases constitutes a public health problem. These high rates of ESBL production by enterobacteria confirm both the high production of ESBL by E. coli strains and the wide spread of this resistance phenomenon in the community and hospital environments.

In this study, it is found that the prevalence of ESBL resistance among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in our hospital institutions was 25.92%. A study conducted in the city of Garoua, capital of the Northern region of Cameroon, found an overall high prevalence of uropathogenic E-ESBL was 19.3% among small children with suspected urinary tract infection [24]. Comparing the results of the two studies indicates that the prevalence of ESBL resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in our institution has increased. Of all the 27 Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated, no MBL phenotypes were observed during our study as all the isolates displayed a 100% resistance to imipenem. In Cameroon, due to the lack of national multi resistant bacteria surveillance, the extent of circulating E-ESBL strains is unknown.

Also in our present study, Stapylococcuss aureus (25%) was the most frequent gram-positive cocci recovered from patients’ clinical urine sample. Out of the 10 Staphylococcus aureus isolate, 23.07% expressed MRSA phenotypes, 38.46% displayed cMLSB, 15.38% were iMLSB and 23.07% were MSB phenotype. A study at a Korean hospital by Modukuru et al. (2021) [25] determined on S. aureus that 17.82% had inducible MLSB, 27.01% had constitutive MLSB, 55.17% had the MS phenotype. Thus, in all the staphylococci isolates, the level of constitutive MLSB resistance was higher than the level of inducible MLSB resistance.

5. Conclusion

The prevalence of UTIs was 37.03%. Good antibiotic activity was shown by aminoglycosides and quinolones. E. coli, K. pneumonia and S. aureus were the most encountered microorganisms. ESBL producers amongst the Enterobacteriaceae members and cMLSB in S. aureus were the most frequent and this might result in an increase in the resistant patterns of resistant isolates in our study area. The emergence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant uropathogenic bacteria constitute a real public health problem for the empirical management of urogenital infections. Updating data and monitoring the sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics remains a key tool to reduce the extent of the phenomenon of multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the patients for their participation in this study, all the staff of the clinical biology Laboratory and Protestant Hospital of Ngaoundere in Cameroun for their tremendous support throughout this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Benjamin TANGUE TALOM: Methodology, formal analysis, writingreviewing and editing, visualization. Berinyuy MONIRATOU: Conceptualization, methodology, writingoriginal draft. Zelda Inès EGUEN: Methodology, writingoriginal draft. Michel Archange TAGNE FOKAM: Formal analysis, reviewing and editing. Carolle Sylvie DONGMO MEFFO: Formal analysis, reviewing and editing. Simeon Pierre CHEGAING FODOUOP: Methodology validation, writingreviewing and editing, supervision. Jules-Roger KUIATE: Methodology validation, writing-reviewing and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Statement

The studies were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Ngaoundere (Ref: N˚2023/0145/UN/R/DFS/CD-DSBM). The confidentiality of the study subjects’ information was maintained in accordance with national and international regulations. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by patients or the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Stamm, W.E. and Norrby, S.R. (2001) Urinary Tract Infections: Disease Panorama and Challenges. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 183, S1-S4.[CrossRef]
[2] Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (2021) Urinary Track Infection Basics.
https://www.cdc.gov/uti/about/index.html
[3] Gupta, K., Hooton, T.M. and Stamm, W.E. (2001) Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance and the Management of Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 41-50.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Zeng, Z., Zhan, J., Zhang, K., Chen, H. and Cheng, S. (2022) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Urinary Tract Infections from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. World Journal of Urology, 40, 755-763.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Saderi, H., Emadi, B. and Owlia, P. (2011) Phenotypic and Genotypic Study of Macrolide, Lincosamide and Streptogramin B (MLSB) Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Tehran, Iran. Medical Science Monitor, 17, BR48-BR53.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Akoachere, J.T.K., Yvonne, S., Akum, N.H. and Seraphine, E.N. (2012) Etiologic Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection in Two Cameroonian Towns. BMC Research Notes, 5, Article No. 219.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mwang’onde, B.J. and Mchami, J.I. (2022) The Aetiology and Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Journal of Health & Biological Sciences, 10, 1-7.[CrossRef]
[8] Smelov, V., Naber, K. and Bjerklund Johansen, T.E. (2016) Improved Classification of Urinary Tract Infection: Future Considerations. European Urology Supplements, 15, 71-80.[CrossRef]
[9] Behzadi, P. (2018) Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Fimbrial Adhesins Virulome. In: Jarzembowski, T., et al., Eds., Urinary Tract InfectionThe Result of the Strength of the Pathogen, or the Weakness of the Host, InTech, 65-83.[CrossRef]
[10] ePILLY Trop (2022) Maladies infectieuses tropicales. 3ème édition Web, Editions Alinéa plus, 1014 p.
[11] Petca, R.C., Popescu, R.I, Mareș, C., Petca, A., Mehedințu, C. Sandu, I. and Măru, N. (2019) Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Common Uropathogens Implicated in Urinary Tract Infections in Romania. Farmacia, 67, 994-1004.[CrossRef]
[12] CA-SFM/EUCAST (2022) Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie/European Committee on Antimicrobien Susceptibility Testing, Recommandations 2022 V.1.0 mai.
[13] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2008).
[14] Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M.M., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M. (1966) Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45, 493-496.[CrossRef]
[15] Singh, T., Poonia, S. and Tsering, D. (2014) Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Bacteria Isolated from Natural Sources of Water from Rural Areas of East Sikkim. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 39, 156-160.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Dirar, M., Bilal, N., Ibrahim, M.E. and Hamid, M. (2020) Resistance Patterns and Phenotypic Detection of β-Lactamase Enzymes among Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from Referral Hospitals in Khartoum State, Sudan. Cureus, 12, e7260.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] https://universe84a.com/collection/beta-lactamases/
[18] Jombo, G., Egah, D., Banwat, E. and Ayeni, J. (2007) Nosocomial and Community Acquired Urinary Tract Infections at a Teaching Hospital in North Central Nigeria: Findings from a Study of 12,458 Samples. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 15, 230-236.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Vasudevan, R. (2014) Urinary Tract Infection: An Overview of the Infection and the Associated Risk Factors. Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation, 1, 42-54.[CrossRef]
[20] Djim-Adjim-Ngana, K., Mbiakop, B.W., Oumar, L.A., Munshili Njifon, H.L., Tchinda Fossi, C., Enyegue, E.L.E., et al. (2023) Phenotypic Characterization and Epidemiology of Extended-Spectrum Β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Strains from Urinary Tract Infections in Garoua, Cameroon. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article ID: 1187934.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Rasamiravaka, T., Shaista Sheila, H.S.L., Rakotomavojaona, T., Rakoto-Alson, A.O. and Rasamindrakotroka, A. (2015) Changing Profile and Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance of Uropathogenic Bacteria in Madagascar. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 45, 173-176.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zalegh, I., Chaoui, L., Maaloum, F., Zerouali, K. and Mhand, R.A. (2023) Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Phenotypes of Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated in Clinical Specimens at Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire IBN Rochd, Morocco. Pan-African Medical Journal, 45, Article No. 41.
[23] Bhargava, K., Nath, G., Bhargava, A., Kumari, R., Aseri, G.K. and Jain, N. (2022) Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Uropathogens Causing Urinary Tract Infection in the Eastern Part of Northern India. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, Article ID: 965053.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Djim-Adjim-Ngana, K., Oumar, L.A., Mbiakop, B.W., Munshili Njifon, H.L., Crucitti, T., Nchiwan, E.N., et al. (2020) Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterial Urinary Infections and Associated Risk Factors in Small Children of Garoua, Northern Cameroon. Pan African Medical Journal, 36, 157-167.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Modukuru, G.K., Surya, P.M.S., Kakumanu, V.R. and Yarava, S. (2021) Phenotypic Characterization of Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 15, 689-694.[CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.