Management and Outcome of Urethral Strictures at Two Tertiary Health Facilities in Cameroon

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Urethral stricture is a reduction in the caliber of the urethral lumen impeding the outflow of urine. It predominantly affects males. The disease burden is severe in our milieu where access to specialized care is limited. Our goal was therefore to assess the management and outcome of male urethral stricture at two tertiary hospitals in Douala, Cameroon. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based retrospective study of patients managed for urethral stricture over 5 years (January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2021) at the Douala General and Laquintinie Hospitals. Data on sociodemographic, clinical, paraclinical, and treatment options were extracted using pre-structured forms. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28. Statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05. Results: We exploited 130 medical records. The mean age of patients was 46.5 years. Dysuria and weak urine stream were the major presenting complaints (63.8% and 23.8% respectively). The etiology of urethral stricture was iatrogenic in 42.3% of cases. The strictures were mostly single (89.8%), and the bulbar urethra was most affected (46.9%). 28 patients had urinary tract infections and the most frequently isolated germ was E. coli in 29.6%. Direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) was performed in 42.3% of cases. Surgery, especially excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) was done in 28.5% of cases. Major complications were wound infection, acute kidney injury (AKI), and urethrocutaneous fistulae affecting 3.1, 2.3, and 1.5% of cases respectively. The recurrence rate was 17% with a mortality rate of 0.08%. Conclusion: Urethral stricture is common in our adult male population. The cause is mainly iatrogenic and the bulbar urethra is most affected. Minimally invasive and open reconstruction are frequently used treatment options with significant recurrence rates in the long term.

Share and Cite:

Mokake, M. , Eyongeta, D. , Ekani, E. , Nunga, D. , Nana, T. , Ngwane, N. , Nalova, M. , Weledji, E. , Mefire, C. and Ngowe, M. (2024) Management and Outcome of Urethral Strictures at Two Tertiary Health Facilities in Cameroon. Open Journal of Urology, 14, 435-446. doi: 10.4236/oju.2024.148046.

1. Introduction

Urethral stricture is an abnormal narrowing of the lumen of the urethra which hinders the flow of urine from the urinary bladder to the external milieu [1]. It is a condition that can occur in both sexes but is rare in females. Worldwide, male urethral strictures have a prevalence of 229 - 627 per 100,000 males, with 40/100,00 in the UK and 200,000 in the USA [2]. In Africa in general and Sub-Saharan Africa in particular, urethral stricture constitutes a burden for the population with a substantial impact on quality of life and health costs. However, epidemiological data on the condition is scarce.

Urethral stricture is common in adult males [3] and can develop throughout the length of the male urethra and have various aetiologies [4]. In high-income countries, the common etiology is iatrogenic with decreasing incidence [5] as compared to increasing incidence of external trauma and infections as common aetiologies in low-income countries [6]. Idiopathic aetiologies are uncommon.

Patients with urethral stricture usually present with progressive obstructive voiding symptoms depending on the severity of the stricture. The research conducted in 2019 by Nwaha et al. in Douala-Cameroon revealed that a weak urinary stream constituted 46.90% of presenting complaints, followed by urinary retention (26.5%) and hematuria (14.3%) [7].

Diagnosis of male urethral stricture is based on a detailed history and, a focused physical exam though limited and paraclinical workup [8]. Management is essentially surgical and depends on the location, length, and severity of the stricture [9].

In 2019, Irekpita et al. [10] reported that there was a delayed presentation in populations of Sub-Saharan Africa, which justified the high incidence of complications. Ignorance and poverty were the principal reasons. In addition, access to specialized services where appropriate diagnostic workup and treatment is available represents a major challenge in our milieu thus increasing the severity of the disease burden.

Data on the management and outcome of male urethral stricture is limited in Cameroon. Our study was therefore to assess the management of patients with this condition as well as highlight the outcome following treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective descriptive hospital-based study at the Laquintinie and General Hospitals in Douala Cameroon. These are two referral centers in the country’s economic capital equipped with the necessary infrastructure to diagnose and manage urethral strictures.

Our study population consisted of all male patients who were diagnosed and treated for urethral stricture between January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2021 (5-year period). We exploited medical records (patient files, operating room registers, discharge, and follow-up reports) to obtain data on sociodemographic features, risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment modality received, and short-term outcomes following treatment. Files with relevant information were excluded in the final analysis.

The outcome variables were the presence of postoperative complications, improvement in urine flow rate on uroflowmetry, and recurrence within 12 months.

Pre-structured data extraction forms were used to assure homogeneity incomplete medical files were excluded from the study.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS), University of Buea, and, administrative approvals from the directors of the institutions where the study was carried out.

Data was anonymized by personal codes. The data was entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28 and Microsoft Excel 2019 for statistical analysis. Results were presented and absolute values, percentages, tables, histograms and pie charts. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Features

Out of 161 eligible case files, 130 met the inclusion criteria with 74 (56.93%) from the General Hospital and 56 (43.07%) from the Laquintinie Hospital in Douala.

The mean of our study population was 46.5 ± 6.5 years (range 3 months to 84 years).

The most affected age group was 30-39 years (21.5%) as illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1. Distribution of patients according to age groups.

Age interval

Frequency

Percentage (%)

≤18 years

20

15.4

19 - 29 years

17

13.1

30 - 39 years

28

21.5

40 - 49 years

25

19.2

50 - 59 years

21

16.1

60 - 69 years

8

6.2

≥70 years

11

8.5

Total

130

100

3.2. Risk Factors

Risk factors for urethral stricture were present in 61.5% (n = 80) with prior STI and pelvic trauma/straddle injury found in 27.5% and 16.3% respectively (see Figure 1). Twelve cases (15%) had undergone prior surgical treatment for BPH, transurethral resection of the prostate in 4 (33%) and open simple prostatectomy in 8 (67%).

Figure 1. Risk factors for urethral stricture.

3.3. Clinical Features

A total of 100 patients (76.9%) presented at outpatient consultation within 1 month of symptom onset while 22 (16.9%) were referred and 8 (6.2%) came as emergencies usually within 6 months.

Dysuria was the most common presenting complaint reported in patients’ files (63.8%), followed by a weak urinary stream (23.8%) and straining (13.8%) as shown in Table 2.

We found 22 (16.9%) patients with symptoms other than LUTS. They were mainly penile pain and swelling and urethrocutaneous fistula post-circumcision.

We had 35 (26.9%) patients who presented with acute urinary retention, 11 (8.5%) with chronic urinary retention, and 02 (1.5%) with overflow incontinence.

Table 2. Symptoms presented by our patients on entry.

Symptoms

Frequency

Percentage

Dysuria

83

63.8%

Weak urinary stream

31

23.8%

Straining

18

13.8%

Hematuria

12

9.2%

Incomplete emptying

7

5.4%

Urgency

6

4.6%

Urethrorrhagia

4

3.1%

Intermittency

1

0.8%

Others

22

16.9%

3.4. Paraclinical Workup

Uroflowmetry was used to confirm a possible diagnosis of urethral stricture in only 23 patients with 69.6% having a flow rate of less than 10 ml/s.

Retrograde urethrogram/voiding cystourethrogram was used to identify the location, number, length, and severity of the stricture. A majority 89.8 % (115) of patients had a single stricture while13 cases had multiple strictures. The bulbar urethra was the most commonly affected segment as shown in Figure 2. Stricture length was properly assessed in 26 patients and 17 (65.4%) were short (<2 cm).

Figure 2. Site of the stricture.

Among the 63 urine cultures reported, 55.6% were sterile, and 44.4% of patients had a urinary tract infection, for which they received an appropriate antibiotherapy. E. coli was found in 29.6% (8) of patients, Klebsiella pneumoniae in 25.9% (7), Staphylococcus aureus in 18.5% (5) and Neisseria gonorrhea in 14.8% (4) of patients. Other germs found were Proteus mirabilis, Acinetobacter baumanii, and Staphylococcus hemolyticus.

3.5. Etiologies

The most common etiology was iatrogenic in 55 (42.3%) cases followed by infectious and external trauma reported in 26.9% and 20.8% of cases respectively. This is illustrated in Table 3.

Table 3. Etiologies of urethral stricture.

Etiologies

Percentage (%)

Iatrogenic

55

42.3

Idiopathic

13

10.0

Infectious

35

26.9

Traumatic

27

20.8

3.6. Management

Direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) was the technique of choice for all short (<1 cm) anterior urethral strictures (42.3%). Other less invasive options employed for management were meatotomy (10%), urethral dilatation (12.9%) and urethral stent placement (3.2%). Cystostomy was used as an adjunct during urethral reconstruction to facilitate antegrade access.

Excision and Primary Anastomosis were the most used surgical methods, constituting 84.1% of surgical management and 28.5% of overall management as shown below in the Table 4.

Table 4. Surgical treatment modalities.

Technique used

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Excision and primary anastomosis

37

84.1

Pedicle flap

4

9.1

Buccal mucosa graft

3

6.8

Urethral catheterization was done intra-operatively with a silicone catheter. Duration of urethral catheterization was dependent on the approach used. The mean duration was 10.31 ± 6.08 days ranging from 3 to 65 days. The most frequent duration of catheterization was 14 days (29.7%)

3.7. Postoperative Complications

Surgical wound infection, wound dehiscence, and scrotal hematoma were the most encountered early postoperative complications as depicted in Figure 3.

We had 23 cases of recurrence representing 17.7% of the study population. The mean time to recurrence was 15.70 ± 11.73 months from treatment (1 to 48 months). Amongst the 23 recurrences, 9 (39.1%) occurred following DVIU, 10 (43.5%) following urethroplasty, and 4 (17.4%) following urethral dilatation.

Other long-term complications were cases 02 of urethra-cutaneous fistulae (1.5%) following a urethral dilation and excision and primary anastomosis and 01 cases (0.8%) of erectile dysfunction following excision and primary anastomosis.

The mean hospital stay was 6.83 ± 6.49 days, ranging from 1 to 40 days.

We found that treatment modality did not influence the rate of recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference between a treatment modality and time to recurrence (Tables 5-7)

Figure 3. Early complications of urethral stricture.

Table 5. Relationship between recurrence and urethral dilation.

Recurrence

Urethral dilatation (%)

N° (%)

p-value

Yes

3 (75)

11 (91.7)

0.383

No

1 (25)

1 (8.3)

Total

4

12

Table 6. Relationship between recurrence and DVIU.

Recurrence

Internal urethrotomy (%)

N° (%)

p-value

Yes

9 (100)

5 (71.4)

0.086

No

0 (0)

2 (28.6)

Total

9

7

Table 7. Relationship between recurrence and surgical management.

Surgical Method

Total

No

Yes

Recurrence?

no

Frequency

2

1

3

%

13.3%

9.1%

11.5%

yes

Frequency

13

10

23

%

86.7%

90.9%

88.5%

p-value = 0.738.

3.8. Follow-Up

Follow-up by assessment of urinary symptoms and flow rates at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment was available for less than 50% of the treated patients.

Dilatation

At 12 months, 3 of 4 patients who had urethral dilatation experienced a progressive reduction in their urine stream with peak flows < 10 ml/s.

DVIU

At 6 months, just 4 out of 17 (23.5%) patients treated with DVIU had flow rates of 21 - 30 ml/s.

While 6 (35.3%) had flow rates below 10 ml/s. Only 9 patients were followed till 12 months and 5 (55.6%) had flow rates of 11 - 20 ml/s while 4 (44.4%) voided at < 10 ml/s

Surgical reconstruction

A total of 9 patients treated surgically were followed till 6 months. Six (66.7%) had amelioration of the flow rate to 11 - 20 ml/s. After 12 months, 4 of 5 patients followed had no significant change in the flow rate. Only 1 patient had a flow rate > 15 ml/s.

There was no statistically significant difference between treatment option and flow rate within 12 months postop.

We had a total of 6 deaths during the follow-up period from unknown causes. One patient died during treatment giving a mortality rate of 0.08% (n = 1).

4. Discussion

Urethral stricture is one of the earliest described urologic pathologies [11]. It is complex due to its complications and tendency for recurrence, which constitutes a concern for urologists in terms of choice of treatment. We found that urethral stricture represented 1.4% of our urologic consultations. This prevalence was higher than that found by Ngaroua et al. [11] [12] whose study showed urethral stricture in 0.6% of outpatient consultations. This could be explained by the fact that our study was conducted in two of the referral hospitals in the most populated city in our country. In our study, the mean age of patients was 46.5 ± 6.5 years corresponding to the middle age group according to WHO [12]-[14]. The most affected age group was that of 30 - 39 years with a percentage of 21.5 %. These results are similar to those of a study carried out 4 years ago in DLH [20] and Kenya [15]-[17] where the mean ages were 47.6 and 43.1 years respectively.

In our work, there was a predominance of iatrogenic strictures (55.42%), followed by infectious causes (35.27%). Traumatic etiology represented 35.27 % and idiopathic 13.1%. Tritschler et al. [13] also found iatrogenic causes in 45% of strictures. This high percentage of iatrogenic strictures in our study probably results from frequent urethral instrumentation with repeated catheterization. That notwithstanding, a study conducted in Kenya by Makanga et al. [18] [19] highlighted infectious etiology in 40% of cases.

Though not life-threatening, urethral stricture is associated with a poor quality of life. It presents with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and patients may come already with complications. We found that patients presented mostly with dysuria (63.8%) and weak urine stream (23.8%). These results are similar to those of Ngaroua et al. and Benjellou et al. who also had dysuria at 70.17% and 82% of the presenting symptoms [11] [19]-[22]. However, Nwaha et al. in a study conducted in Douala [9] found weak urinary stream as the main symptom in 46.9% of patients.

RUG/VCUG was the investigation of choice for diagnosing urethral strictures. Bulbar urethral localization of the stricture was the most frequent in 46.9%. Penile, meatal, and membranous strictures were found in 15.4, 14.6, and 13.1% of cases respectively. In Nigeria Akpayak et al. [14] reported rates close to ours with 56.3% of bulbar, 13.6 and 7.8% of penile and bulbo-membranous strictures respectively. A study conducted by Guena et al. [15] reported a higher rate of membranous strictures (81.8%). This may be because the majority of his study population were drivers and soldiers who were more prone to suffer from pelvic injuries.

We found that 89.8% of strictures were single and 10.2% were multiple. These results are almost similar to the findings of a study in Burkina Faso [23] where 80.3% of strictures were single and 19.7% multiple. However, the prevalence of single urethral stricture was 58% in a study conducted in Senegal [24]. This difference could be explained by the fact that the study focused mainly on patients with pelvic fracture-related urethral injury undergoing urethroplasty as compared to ours wherein all treatment modalities were considered.

A germ was isolated following urine culture in 44.4% in favor of a UTI. These findings are similar to the studies by Moby et al. and Nwaha et al. [9] [20]. E. coli and Klebsiella pneumonia were the most frequently cultured organisms (29.6 and 25.9%). Kouame et al. [24] also reported E. coli as the most frequent causative agent as did Tengue et al. in Togo [8] who found E. coli in 61.5% of UTIs.

DVIU was the technique most used in our study. It represented 42.3% of all procedures. This goes along with the study of Ngaroua et al. [11] where DVIU represented 58% of all treatment methods used. Yet, Bah et al. [12] in his study reported urethroplasty was done in 67.5%. This difference could be explained by the fact that DVIU was systematically done for all new strictures less than 1cm long within the bulbar urethra in our referral centers having endoscopic equipment readily available.

In our study, urethral dilation represented 9.2% of all procedures. This was less than Ze Ondo et al. [18] who reported urethral dilation as the main technique used in 54% of cases. This could be explained by the fact that his study focused on iatrogenic urethral stricture, with a smaller sample size.

Surgical management was carried out for strictures > 2 cm and strictures resulting from pelvic trauma or recurrence following dilatation or DVIU. The main technique used was the anastomotic urethroplasty (excision and primary anastomosis), which represented 28.5% of all procedures. This is similar to the findings of Yaméogo et al. [23] who reported that 38.6% of cases underwent end-to-end anastomosis. However, Bah et al. [12] found that urethroplasty was done in 67.5% of patients. This higher percentage could be because his study focused on post-traumatic urethral strictures.

The duration of postoperative urethral catheterization ranged from 3 - 65 days, with a mean of 10.31 ± 6.08 days. This was shorter than the findings of Kouame et al. [24] and Nwaha et al. [9] who reported a mean duration of 11.55 ± 11 and 14.7 ± 9.4 days respectively. This difference likely stems from the more frequent use of DVIU with a shorter duration of postop catheterization as compared to urethroplasty techniques in our study.

The most common complication we found was surgical wound infection, found in 3.1% of patients. Acute urinary retention, UTI, scrotal hematoma, and wound dehiscence represented 2.3, 1.5, 1.5, and 1.5% respectively. This is inferior to the findings of Ekeke et al. [1] who reported bleeding and wound infections in 22 and 22% of patients respectively following open urethral reconstruction.

We reported a recurrence rate of 17%. This is identical to the study by Makanga et al. [19] who also had a 17% recurrence rate. The recurrence rate was lower in a study by Van den Heever et al. [16] who found a 13% recurrence but quite high according to Tengue et al. [8] who had 22% stricture recurrence.

Our study illustrated that minimally invasive treatment using DVIU yielded fewer complications and better short-term improvement in urine flow rate than reconstructive surgical techniques. This goes along with the findings of Ngaroua et al. [11] who reported a success rate of 87.73% associated with DVIU. However, there was no statistically significant difference in flow rates and recurrence within 12 months for any of the treatment methods.

5. Conclusion

Urethral stricture is common in our adult male population. The cause is mainly iatrogenic and the bulbar urethra is most affected. E. coli is the most frequently cultured germ. Minimally invasive and open reconstruction are frequently used treatment options with significant recurrence rates in the long term.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Ekeke, O.N. and Amusan, O.E. (2017) Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Urethral Stricture: Experience from a Tertiary Hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. African Journal of Urology, 23, 72-77.[CrossRef]
[2] Abdeen, B.M. and Badreldin, A.M. (2021) Urethral Strictures. StatPearls Publishing.
[3] Yusoff, Z., Mustapa, H., Nasir, H. and Ab Manap, N. (2019) A Study on Prevalence and Causes Factor of Urethral Strictures among Male Patients in Urology Referral Centre. ILKKM Journal Medical and Health Sciences, 1, 31-36.
[4] Lumen, N., Hoebeke, P., Willemsen, P., De Troyer, B., Pieters, R. and Oosterlinck, W. (2009) Etiology of Urethral Stricture Disease in the 21st Century. Journal of Urology, 182, 983-987.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Steenkamp, J.W. and De Kock, M.L.S. (1994) Epidemiology of Urethral Stricture at Tygerberg Hospital. South African Medical Journal, 84, 267-268.
[6] Mugalo, E.L., Bwombwongo, S.O. and Ayuo, P.O. (2013) Aetiology of Urethral Strictures at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital. Annals of African Surgery, 10, 11-14.
[7] Verla, W., Oosterlinck, W., Spinoit, A. and Waterloos, M. (2019) A Comprehensive Review Emphasizing Anatomy, Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Male Urethral Stricture Disease. BioMed Research International, 2019, Article 9046430.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Tengue, K., Kpatcha, T.M., Leloua, E., Botcho, G., Sikpa, K., Sewa, E., et al. (2014) Stenose de l’uretre masculin: Aspects epidemiologiques, diagnostiques, therapeutiques et evolutifs au chu Sylvanus Olympio au Togo. Journal de la Recherche Scientifique de l’Université de Lomé, 16, 399-405.
[9] Nwaha, A.M., Moby, E.M., Tchuenkam, L.W., Essomba, Q.A., Happy, S.H., Biyouma, D.M., et al. (2019) Profile of Patients with Urethral Stricture Managed by Endoscopic Urethrotomy in Two Hospitals in Douala-Cameroon. Journal of Surgery, 4, Article 1202.
[10] Eshiobo, I. and Ernest, U. (2019) A Review of the Epidemiology and Management of Urethral Stricture Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. Current Medical Issues, 17, 118-124.[CrossRef]
[11] Ngaroua, N., Eloundou, N.J., Djibrilla, Y., Asmaou, O. and Mbo, A.J. (2017) Aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et prise en charge de sténose urétrale chez l’adulte dans un Hôpital de District de Ngaoundéré, Cameroun. Pan African Medical Journal, 26, Article 193.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Bah, I., Bah, M.B., Barry, M., Kante, I.I., Sow, D., Barry, M.S., et al. (2020) Sténose urétrale post traumatique: Aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques au service d’urologie de l’hôpital Ignace Deen, CHU de Conakry, Guinée. Revue Africaine de Chirurgie et Spécialités, 14, 15-20.
[13] Tritschler, S., Roosen, A., Füllhase, C., Stief, C.G. and Rübben, H. (2013) Urethral Stricture. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 110, 220-226.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Akpayak, I.C. (2015) Male Urethral Stricture: Aetiology and Location. Jos Journal of Medicine, 9, 1-4.
[15] Guena, M.N., Alapha, F.Z., Wandji, E.L., Zeh, O.F. and Fotsing, J.G. (2019) Epidemiologic, Clinical and Radiological Aspects of Male Urethral Strictures at the Ngaoundéré Regional Hospital. Open Journal of Radiology, 9, 115-124.[CrossRef]
[16] van den Heever, A.P., Lazarus, J., Naudé, J.H., Wiechers, L. and Tsheisi, M. (2012) Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Urethroplasties Performed for Various Etiologies in a Single South African Center. African Journal of Urology, 18, 127-130.[CrossRef]
[17] Ashiundu, E. and Musau, P. (2019) Modernity and the Changing Pattern of Aetiologies of Urethral Strictures at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya. East African Medical Journal, 96, 2622-2625.
[18] Ze Ondo, C., Fall, B., Diallo, Y., Sow, Y., Sarr, A., Ngonga, R., et al. (2015) Les rétrécissements iatrogènes de l’urètre: Expérience d’un hôpital Sénégalais. African Journal of Urology, 21, 144-147.[CrossRef]
[19] Makanga, W. and Agbo, C.A. (2019) One-Stage Urethroplasty for Strictures at a Rural Hospital. Annals of African Surgery, 16, 16-19.[CrossRef]
[20] Moby, E.H., Makon, S., Eyongueta, D., Kamadjou, C., Sala, B.T., Happy, S., et al. (2018) Traitement des sténoses de l’urètre par urétrotomie interne endoscopique: Profil épidémiologique, clinique, et thérapeutique à Douala. Revue de Médecine et de Pharmacie, 8, 775-783.
[21] Dyussenbayev, A. (2017) Age Periods of Human Life. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4, 258-263.[CrossRef]
[22] Benjelloun, M., Drissi, M., Makhloufi, M., Nouri, A., Karmouni, T., Tazi, K., et al. (2008) Article Original Traitement des sténoses de l’urètre par urétrotomie interne endoscopique: Résultats anatomiques et fonc-tionnels d’une série de 244 cas. 14, 114-119.[CrossRef]
[23] Kiemdiba Donega Yaméogo, C.A.M., Mahamat, M.A., Kirakoya, B., Ouattara, A., Traoré, T.M., Ky, B., et al. (2020) Male Urethral Strictures in Ouagadougou (burkina Faso): Epidemiological Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects. Open Journal of Urology, 10, 101-110.[CrossRef]
[24] Kouame, B., Ndoye, M., Kramo, F., Roua, M., Gandonou, J.J., Yassin, S., et al. (2017) Men Urethra Strictures: Findings in Urethroplasties Care at the Andrology and Urology Department of Grand Yoff General Hospital in Dakar. Open Journal of Urology, 7, 173-185.[CrossRef]

Copyright © 2026 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.