Building a Better Mousetrap: Replacing Subjective Writing Rubrics with More Empirically-Sound Alternatives for EFL Learners

Creative Education

ISSN Print: 2151-4755
ISSN Online: 2151-4771
www.scirp.net/journal/ce
E-mail: [email protected]

Citations

Journals Menu

Guidelines & Policies

"Building a Better Mousetrap: Replacing Subjective Writing Rubrics with More Empirically-Sound Alternatives for EFL Learners"
written by Andrew D. Schenck, Eoin Daly,
published by Creative Education, Vol.3 No.8, 2012

has been cited by the following article(s):

Google Scholar
CrossRef

[1]	Transformations of number of words and phrases signaling supporting details: Potential variables for automated rating
	Language Education & Technology, 2023

[2]	Curriculum theory and practice: A comparative literature review
	HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY …, 2023

[3]	A Human-AI Integrated Rating System for Improving Second Language Writing: The Case of Japanese Learners of English for General Academic Purposes
	2023

[4]	The Role of Rubrics in Learning and Implementation of Authentic Assessment: A Literature Review
	2020

[5]	Aleph: An indicator of decision-making patterns within collaborative marking sessions for writing assessment that can predict reliability
	2020

[6]	La evaluación de la competencia narrativa en la educación básica: The assessment of narrative competence during compulsory schooling
	2019

[7]	La evaluación de la competencia narrativa en la educación básica1 The assessment of narrative competence during compulsory schooling
	2019

[8]	Potential Influence of a Learner's Regulatory Orientations on the Linguistic Dimensions of Second Language Writing Task Performance
	2018

[9]	NESTs, Necessary or Not? Examining the Impact of Native English Speaker Instruction in South Korea.
	Journal of International Education and Leadership, 2018

[10]	The Potential Influence of a Learner's Regulatory Orientations on the Linguistic Dimensions of Second Language Writing Task Performance
	2018

[11]	Task-Modality Effects: A Study of Task Complexity Effects in Speech and Writing
	2017

[12]	Co-evaluación de textos narrativos en la educación obligatoria
	2017

[13]	Understanding variations between student and teacher application of rubrics
	Assessing Writing, 2015

[14]	Using Rubrics as Formative Assessments to Coach ELL Writers
	2014

[15]	Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality
	Assessing Writing, Elsevier, 2014

[16]	Measuring written linguistic accuracy with weighted clause ratios: A question of validity
	Journal of Second …, 2014

[1]	Variability and Variation in L2 Writing Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2026 DOI:10.1007/978-3-032-10318-5_4

[2]	Aleph: An indicator of decision-making patterns within collaborative marking sessions for writing assessment that can predict reliability 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2020 DOI:10.1109/ICALT49669.2020.00041

[3]	ESL Students’ Perception of Teacher’s Written Feedback Practice in Malaysian Classrooms Creative Education, 2018 DOI:10.4236/ce.2018.914170

[4]	Understanding variations between student and teacher application of rubrics Assessing Writing, 2015 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.003

[5]	Measuring written linguistic accuracy with weighted clause ratios: A question of validity Journal of Second Language Writing, 2014 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.02.005

[6]	Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality Assessing Writing, 2014 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003

	[email protected]
	+86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
	1655362766

	Paper Publishing WeChat

Creative Education

Creative Education

Journals Menu

Guidelines & Policies

Home

About SCIRP

Service

Policies