<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TEL</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Theoretical Economics Letters</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2078</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/tel.2014.48089</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">TEL-50790</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Note on Separability of the Profit Function
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>olf</surname><given-names>Färe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Giannis</surname><given-names>Karagiannis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rolf.fare@oregonstate.edu(OF)</email>;<email>karagian@uom.gr(GK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>702</fpage><lpage>704</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Based on the concept of translation elasticity we restate in this note the Fare and Grosskopf’s 
  [1]
  
   conditions for additive separability of the profit function. We show that for the profit function to be additively separable, the technology must satisfy both simultaneous input-and-output translation homotheticity and graph translation homotheticity.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Separability</kwd><kwd> Profit Function</kwd><kwd> Directional Distance Function</kwd><kwd> Graph Translation Homotheticity</kwd><kwd>  Simultaneous Input-and-Output Translation Homotheticity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Review</title><p>F&#228;re and Grosskopf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref1">1</xref>] derived conditions on production technology which are required for the profit function to be additively separable into a revenue function component depending only on output prices and a cost function component depending only on input prices. In particular, they showed that simultaneous input-and-output translation homotheticity of production technology implies additive separability of the profit function and vice versa, for some input and output direction vectors such as that the inner product of output prices and the output direction vector is equal to the inner product of inputs prices and the input direction vector. In the light of recent work by Balk, F&#228;re and Karagiannis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref2">2</xref>] one can verify that the latter condition implies indeed graph translation homotheticity. We may then restate F&#228;re and Grosskopf’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref1">1</xref>] proposition as following: the profit function is additively separable if and only if technology is simultaneous input-and-output translation homothetic and exhibits graph translation homotheticity.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote a vector of inputs and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, a vector of outputs with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> being</p><p>their corresponding price vectors. The technology is defined in terms of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is</p><p>closed, allows for free disposability of inputs and outputs, and it contains<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then the directional tech-</p><p>nology distance function, which is the negative of the shortage function introduced by Luenberger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref3">3</xref>] , is given as (see Chambers, Chung and F&#228;re [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref4">4</xref>] ):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula146"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and has the following properties: first, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>if and only if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> assuming <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are</p><p>freely disposable; second, it is non-decreasing in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if inputs are freely disposable; third, it is non-increasing in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if outputs are freely disposable; fourth, it is concave in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is convex; fifth,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(translation property); and sixth, it is homogeneous of de-</p><p>gree −1 in the direction vector<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The directional technology distance function is general enough</p><p>and it contains all other forms of directional functions as special cases. In particular, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>results in the directional input distance function while <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives rise to the directional output distance function.</p><p>Following F&#228;re and Grosskopf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref1">1</xref>] , the technology is simultaneously input-and-output translation homothetic if the directional technology distance function takes the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula147"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the directional output and input distance functions, respectively.</p><p>On the other hand, additive separability of the profit function implies that [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref5">5</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula148"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In order to prove that (1) implies (2) and vice versa, F&#228;re and Grosskopf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref1">1</xref>] had to chose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such</p><p>that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., the value of output direction vector is equal to the value of input direction vector, which</p><p>at a first instance may be seen as a convenient normalization. Nevertheless, based on recent work by Balk, F&#228;re and Karagiannis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref2">2</xref>] we can now claim that this is far from being just a convenient normalization. Quite the opposite: it is related to a particular property of production technology, namely graph translation homotheticity. To see this we follow Balk, F&#228;re and Karagiannis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref2">2</xref>] in defining the translation elasticity as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula149"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which gives the maximal number of times the output direction vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is allowed by the technology to be added into output quantities when the input direction vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been added a particular number of times into input quantities. From the duality between the profit function and the directional technology distance function we have (see Chambers, Chung and F&#228;re [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref4">4</xref>] ):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula150"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the corresponding first-order conditions being <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By substituting them into (3) one can verify that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, namely that the</p><p>translation elasticity is equal to the relative value of the input and the output direction vector. Then, constant re-</p><p>turns to translation in the direction of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> imply that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and thus,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This in turn implies</p><p>that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., graph translation homotheticity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref6">6</xref>] . In addition, Briec and Kerstens</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref7">7</xref>] showed that in this case</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula151"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combining (1) and (4) results in the following form of the directional technology distance function:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50790-formula152"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We can thus replace the requirement of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500540x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in F&#228;re and Grosskopf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50790-ref1">1</xref>] conditions for the separabi-</p><p>lity of the profit function with that of the last two equalities in (5).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Conclusion</title><p>In this note we have restated the directional distance function characterization of the technology required for additive separability of the profit function based on the concept of translation elasticity. We have shown in particular that for the profit function to be additively separable, the technology must satisfy both simultaneous input-and-output translation homotheticity and graph translation homotheticity.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.50790-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fare, R. and Grosskopf, S. (2000) On Separability of the Profit Function. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 105, 609-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004693107475</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50790-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balk, B.M., Fare, R. and Karagiannis, G. (2014) On Directional Scale Elasticities. Journal of Productivity Analysis. (forthcoming). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0399-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50790-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luenberger, D.G. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50790-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chambers, R.G., Chung, Y. and Fare, R. (1998) Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nelrovian Efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98, 351-364. &lt;br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637501082</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50790-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lau, L.J. (1972) Profit Functions for Technologies with Multiple Inputs and Outputs. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 281-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1937989</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50790-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chambers, R.G. (2002) Exact Nonradial Input, Output and Productivity Measurement. Economic Theory, 20, 751-765.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001990100231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50790-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Briec, W. and Kerstens, K. (2004)A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Indicator: Its Relation to the Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Index and the Luenberger Productivity Indicator. Economic Theory, 23, 925-939.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00199-003-0403-2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>