<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2014.411090</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-48489</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>MEDICINE &amp; HEALTHCARE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Pica Practices among Pregnant Women Are Associated with Lower Hemoglobin Levels and Pregnancy Outcome</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fahimeh</surname><given-names>Khoushabi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Parvin</surname><given-names>Ahmadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>Reza Shadan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Azadeh</surname><given-names>Heydari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Miri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maryam</surname><given-names>Jamnejad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Health, Zabol University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zabol, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>fyasiny@yahoo.com(FK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>646</fpage><lpage>652</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	Pica is an eating disorder
in which non-nutritional objects are frequently eaten, and may have serious
side effects for both the mother and neonate. The aim of this study was to
determine the pica and its association with biochemical profiles of pregnant
women and its relation to pregnancy outcome. A prospective cohort study was
conducted in five health care centers in Zahedan City, Iran, in 2011-2012.
Samples of pregnant women (n = 200) in the age groups 18 - 40 years were
selected for this study and interviewed using a questionnaire. Maternal
biochemical profiles (hemoglobin and ferritin) during pregnancy, mean gestational
age and pregnancy outcome namely height, weight, and head circumferences of
neonates were compared to pregnant women who reported pica (pica group) and
women who did not (without pica group). The results showed pica prevalence
categorized by substance as follows: clay (23.3%), ice (53.7%), ice and freezer
frost (11.5%) and other substances (11.5%). Women in pica group had lower
hemoglobin levels during the three trimesters of pregnancy than without pica
group. Head circumferences of neonates in pica groups were significantly lower
than those of without pica groups (31.0 ± 0.6 vs. 34.0 ± 0.2 respectively).
There were no differences in mean birth weight, length, gestational age of
infants born to pregnant women from the pica group and without pica group. The
findings suggest that the pica practices during pregnancy are associated with
lower maternal hemoglobin during the pregnancy
periods, and also significantly lower head circumferences of neonates.
Dietitians should ask pregnant women with anemia about pica and should counsel
pregnant women who report pica.
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pica</kwd><kwd> Pregnancy Period</kwd><kwd> Pregnancy Outcome</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Some pregnant women have a tendency to eat non-food substances. Pica is an eating disorder in which non- nutritional objects are frequently eaten. “Pica” generally refers to compulsive intake of nonfood substances over a sustained period of time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref5">5</xref>] . “Geophagia” specifically refers to compulsive eating of clay or dirt. Other substances that may be consumed include ice or freezer frost (pagophagia) laundry starch, soap, ashes, chalks, paint or burnt matches. However abnormal craving for and intake of some food items, such as corn starch or baking soda, are also considered examples of pica. Food craving and aversions are also very common during pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref6">6</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref8">8</xref>] . Some of the most commonly craved items are chocolate, citrus fruits, pickles, chips and ice cream. The most common aversions are coffee, tea, fried or fatty foods highly spiced foods, meat and eggs. Food craving may be related to increase energy intake and aversions, and reduce the energy intake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The prevalence of pica according different reports is 0% - 68% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref10">10</xref>] . Food provides all nutrients for growth, survival and reproduction. Proper nutrition is important during pregnancy and cannot be ignored, because the health and nutritional status of mother and fetus are mainly depended on it. Therefore, understanding about pica, food cravings and aversions during pregnancy is important in ensuring a mother and fetus attains adequate health and nutrition. Despite this, pica’s effects are less studied in Zahedanian pregnant women and the outcome of their pregnancies. This study therefore sought to determine the pica and its association with biochemical profiles of pregnant women and its relation to pregnancy outcome.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Selection of Area, Health Care Centers and Subjects</title><p>Zahedan, a city situated in Sistan and Baluchestan province, located in the eastern border of Iran. A survey of the thirty health care centers in Zahedan City was done to select the centers for current study. For this study Zahedan City was considered as five zones divisions (north, south, east and west and center). Five health care centers were selected based on their acceptance and willingness to extend support for the study.</p><p>The sample size was determined using the formula,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\2-1430724x\e63fc305-bbed-4125-85e5-c1a45a87ae78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; where “n” is estimated sample size; “z” is the critical z score based on the desired degree of confidence; “p” is the prevalence rate and is the desired margin of error. Based on Mortazavi and Mohammadian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref10">10</xref>] , a prevalence rate of 15% was chosen. Finally, a value of 200 was obtained to represent the target population.</p><p>The selected pregnant women were followed up to the third trimester ending in child birth. The inclusion criteria were age group (18 - 40 years) and having common health care visit during the three trimesters of pregnancy in selected women. The pregnant women with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were excluded from the study. The study was approved by Human Ethical Committee of the University of Medical Science. A written consent to participate in the study was obtained from each subject. The study was carried out in the year 2011 to 2012.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Questionnaire</title><p>Subjects were asked about their habits of eating clay or dirt, ice, starch, raw rice, or other food or nonfood substances during pregnancy period, and food craving as compulsive and elected ingestion of food substance at least once a day. A food substance was defined as any substance that can be digested and metabolized to give energy and build tissue. Compulsive ingestion of ice raw rice, and starch were classified as pica rather than food craving.</p><p>Gestational age was derived from last menstrual period or ultrasound. Maternal blood was analyzed for their hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels during the three trimesters of pregnancy.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Assessment of Biochemical Profiles</title><p>Blood samples were collected from pregnant women during the end of each trimester of pregnancy period. The blood was drawn in the morning between 8 and 11 am. While in an upright position, the tourniquet was applied for a few seconds, and the venous blood was drawn by means of venipuncture (vacutainer system with multiple sample needles was used). The usual precaution of selecting an easily accessible vein in the anticubital fossa and applying the minimum of venous stasis was observed. A total of 10 cc of blood was collected from each volunteer, and immediately 7 cc of it was transferred into a clean, screw-capped glass tube without anticoagulant and allowed to stand at room temperature until the separation of the serum was started by centrifugation at 4˚C, at a speed of 3000 rpm. The separated sera were kept at −20˚C until analyses were done. Analysis were done at the Imam Reza Hospital Lab, Mashhad Before the analysis, the separated frozen sera were placed at room temperature to allow thawing, and then were mixed. The analyzed parameters included hemoglobin (g/dL) and ferritin (ng/mL). Hemoglobin and Serum ferritin levels were analyzed in the hospital laboratory by cyanomethemoglobin method and Elisa method (on a fully automated Eliza plate reader; Best 2000) respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Anthropometric Measurements of Neonates</title><p>Anthropometric measurements of neonates, namely weight, height and head circumferences, were taken within 24 hours after birth, using standard procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref12">12</xref>] . A beam balance by an accuracy of 50 g was employed for weighing the infants. Infants were weighted, with minimum clothing while they were restful. The infant- meter was used for measuring the recumbent length of the newborn infant. A lightweight fiberglass infant-meter was used to measure length up to 100 cm. Infants were laid on the board of the infant-meter, which was kept on a flat table. The crown of the head was in the contact with the top end of the device. The knee was extended, so that the feet were at right angles to the leg. The mobile device was then brought in contact with the feet of neonate. This distance between the two right angle devices was measured. The reading was recorded in centimeters with an accuracy of 0.5 cm. The infant’s head was steadied and the greatest circumference measured, by placing the fiberglass tape firmly round the frontal bones, just supra-orbital ridges. The tape was passed round the head at the same level, on each side, and laying it over the maximum occipital prominence on the back.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 11.5) was used to analyze the data. Frequencies and descriptive statistics (Percentages, means and standard deviations) were generated for variables. The independent t-test was used to determine a difference between the two groups (namely with pica and without pica groups). P value of less than 0.05 was considered as significance level.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Demographic characteristics of pregnant women are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Mean age of pregnant women was 24.3 &#177; 5.6 year. Majority of the women were between the ages of 20 and 29 years (53.9%). The highest percentages of pregnant women (35%) had a higher school education, followed by graduation level (30%). Eighty two percent of pregnant women were housewives. A majority of the subjects (60.4%) were expecting their first child.</p><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Demographic characteristics of pregnant women.</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (28)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 (53.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (18)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years) (Mean &#177; SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >24.3 &#177; 5.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Illiterate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (35)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 (30)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164 (82)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (18)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 (60.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79 (39.5)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s3_1"><title>Pica Practice, Food Craving and Avoid</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents dietary behaviors among the subjects in terms of pica practice, food craving and avoidance in each trimester. Our finding showed a decrease in prevalence of pica and food craving with increase of each trimester of pregnancy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest prevalence of pica (17.5%) observed in the first trimester of pregnancy, while the lowest prevalence (5.6%) was observed in the third trimester of pregnancy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Common forms of pica practice were ice (53.7%), clay eating (23.3%), ice and freezer frost (11.5%) and other items (11.5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Reasons associated with the pica practice included prevention of salivation, nausea and vomiting. Food craving was also a common practice among the pregnant women, with a greater number of the pregnant women (59.7%) craving for at least one food item during the first trimester of pregnancy. Food craving during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy were 54.2% and 40.7% respectively. Foods commonly craved for included sweet items (20.4%), chocolate (19.7%), candies (12.6%), and ice cream (15.3%). Surprisingly quite a large number of the women (18.7%) craved for cereal products or foods belonging to starchy roots. The reasons expressed by the pregnant women for food craving were for satisfaction and to prevent either nausea or vomiting. Food avoidance in the first trimester was reported by 50.7% of the women. In the second trimester, food avoidance was reported among 46.1% while 47.6% avoided certain foods in the third trimester. The avoided foods included meat and fish, eggs and milk, green leafy vegetables and cereals, and greasy foods. Reasons associated with food avoidance were the taste or smell of food, feeling of nausea or vomiting and texture of food.</p><p>Hemoglobin levels during the three trimesters of pregnancy in pica and without pica groups were as follows; (10.8 g/dL vs. 12.1 g/dL, 10.4 g/dL vs. 10.6 g/dL and 10.5 g/dL vs. 11.8 g/dL respectively) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Ferritin levels in pica and without pica groups during the three trimesters of pregnancy periods were 64.3 ng/mL vs.70.3 ng/mL; 61.0 ng/mL vs. 69.1 ng/mL and 63.9 ng/mL vs. 70.4 ng/mL respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Anthropometric measurements of the neonates born from mothers with pica and mothers without pica, namely birth weight, height, head circumference and gestational age showed mean 3.211 kg, 49.1 cm, 31.0 cm, 39.2 wk and 3.430 kg, 50.0 cm, 34.0 cm, 39.5 wk respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Finding showed the prevalence of pica in the current study (17.5%) was a slightly higher than Mortazavi and Mohammadi (15.5%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref10">10</xref>] and lower than the prevalence of pica that reported by Faustina et al. (47%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Pica practices, food craving and avoidance among pregnant women during pregnancy periods.</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Practices</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Practices during pregnancy periods N (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (17.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (8.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165 (82.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183 (91.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189 (94.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Food craving</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119 (59.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 (54.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 (40.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 (40.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.6 (45.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119 (59.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Food avoidance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (50.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 (46.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95 (47.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99 (49.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 (53.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105 (52.4)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 3</object-id><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>. Pica prevalence by substances (n = 35).</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pica substance</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ice &amp; freezer frost</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 4</object-id><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>. Maternal biochemical profiles during pregnancy periods in pregnant women with and without pica.</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Trimester of pregnancy</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Groups</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P value<sup>**</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With pica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without pica</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Hb (g/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.05)<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.09)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.05)<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Ferritin (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.3 &#177; 42.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.3 &#177; 50.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.08)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.0 &#177; 22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.1 &#177; 45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.06)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.9 &#177; 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.4 &#177; 59.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.08)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>P &lt; 0.05; <sup>NS</sup>: not significant; <sup>**</sup>t-test results.</p><table-wrap id="table5"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 5</object-id><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>. Newborn characteristics at delivery in the two groups (with pica and without pica).</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Groups</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P value<sup>**</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With pica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without pica</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestational age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.5 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.32)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth weight (kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.211 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.430 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.08)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.1 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.0 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.62)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Head circumference (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.8 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.0 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.11)<sup>NS</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>P &lt; 0.05; <sup>NS</sup>: not significant; <sup>**</sup>t-test results.</p><p>The prevalence of pica ice was similar to the prevalence of pica ice/freezer reported by Rainville [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref13">13</xref>] results. But it was much higher than expected, based on the results of previous studies such as Edwards; Cooksey; Corbett; Smulian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref14">14</xref>] that included ice and freezer frost as pica substances. The prevalence of pica ice (53.7%) in this study was lower than the 70% and 60.9% that reported by Lopez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref15">15</xref>] and Mortazavi and Mohammadi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref10">10</xref>] . Food craving and avoidance in our finding were higher than the food craving and avoidance that reported by Nyaruhucha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Comparison between biochemical profiles of pregnant women with and without pica during the three trimesters of pregnancy showed that, except hemoglobin in the second trimester of pregnancy, hemoglobin levels in the pica group were significantly lower than non pica group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Similar results reported by Rainville [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref13">13</xref>] and Kettaneh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref17">17</xref>] . In Lopez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref15">15</xref>] study there was not a significant difference between hemoglobin levels in pica group and the control group. Ferritin levels during the three trimesters of pregnancy were lower in pica group than the control group, but the difference was not significance, while in Kettaneh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref17">17</xref>] and Lopez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref15">15</xref>] the mean serum ferritin concentration was found to be higher in the pica groups.</p><p>Comparison of outcome of pregnancy in women with pica and without pica are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. In the group who stated consumption of non food substances (pica) during their pregnancy gestational age, birth weight, length and head circumferences of neonates were slightly lower than those of without pica, but analysis of data showed there was no significant difference among them. Our finding supported by Rainville [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48489-ref13">13</xref>] study, that reported the pica practices is not associated with pregnancy outcome.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>As the findings show the pica practices are associated with significantly lower maternal hemoglobin levels at delivery but it isn’t associated with pregnancy outcome. Dietitian should ask pregnant women with anemia about pica and should counsel pregnant women who report pica.</p><p>Pica diagnosis during pregnancy is inexpensive and should be included in prenatal care; its early diagnosis would contribute to the identification of pregnant women who could be at increased risk for iron deficiency. In addition, it is necessary to implement strategies as regards both the evaluation and the nutritional education.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflict of Interest and Funding</title><p>The current research is an academic research and all expenses are self-financing. No conflict of interest exists for any author.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We appreciate the administrators of health care centers, for their support and cooperation. Cooperation of the staff in selected of health care centers is highly acknowledged. We would like to thank the laboratory experts of Imam Reza Hospital and other colleagues who have contributed to this research. We are sincerely indebted to all the participants who made this study possible.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES@endMarkP#wang#_title:ep!!!</title><p></p><disp-formula id="scirp.48489-formula386"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\2-1430724x\6fac25f0-1fe7-44e8-a95f-6b85649621ec.png"/></disp-formula><p><sup>*</sup>Corresponding author.</p><p></p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.48489-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">HORNER, R.D., LACKEY, C.J., KOLASA, K. AND WARREN K. (1991) PICA PRACTICES OF PREGNANT WOMEN. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 91, 34-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SMULIAN</surname><given-names> J.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MOTIVALA</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SIGMAN</surname><given-names> R.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>PICA IN RURAL OBSTETRIC POPULATION</article-title><source> SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL</source><volume> 88</volume>,<fpage> 1236</fpage>-<lpage>1240</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://SEARCH.EBSCOHOST.COM 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1097/00007611-199512000-00010</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EDWARD, C.H., JOHNSON, A.A., KNIGHT, E.M., OYEMADE, U.J., COLE, O.J., WESTNEY, O.E., JONES, S., LARYEA, H. AND WESTNEY, L.S. (1994) PICA IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 124, 954S-962S. 
WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/8201446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>FAUSTINA</surname><given-names> O.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> TWUMASI</surname><given-names> M.P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AMENAWONYO</surname><given-names> K.X.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LARBIE</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ASOMANING</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BAFFO</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>PICA PRACTICE AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN IN THE KUMASI METROPOLIS OF GHANA</article-title><source> INTERNATIONAL HEALTH</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 282</fpage>-<lpage>286</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.INHE.2010.09.004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SIMPSON</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MULL</surname><given-names> J.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LONGLEY</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> EAST</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>PICA DURING PREGNANCY IN LOW-INCOME WOMEN BORN IN MEXICO</article-title><source> WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE</source><volume> 173</volume>,<fpage> 20</fpage>-<lpage>24</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1136/EWJM.173.1.20</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">POPE, J.F., SKINNER, J.D. AND CARRUTH, B.R. (1992) CRAVING AND AVERSIONS OF PREGNANT ADOLESCENTS. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 92, 1479-1482. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/1452960</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAIRBURN, C.G., STEIN, A. AND JONES, R. (1992) EATING HABITS AND EATING DISORDERS DURING PREGNANCY. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 54, 665-672. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/1454960  
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1097/00006842-199211000-00006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CORBETT, R.W., RYAN, C. AND WEINRICH, S.P. (2003) PICA IN PREGNANCY: DOES IT AFFECT PREGNANCY OUTCOMES? AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 28, 183-189. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/12771697 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1097/00005721-200305000-00009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LOPEZ, L., SOLER, C.R.O. AND PORTELA, M.L.D. (2004) PICA DURING PREGNANCY: A FREQUENTLY UNDERESTIMATED PROBLEM. ARCHIVOS LATINOAMERICANOS DE NUTRICION, 54, 17-24. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/15332352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MORTAZAVI, Z. AND MOHAMMADI, M. (2010) PREVALENCE OF PICA IN PREGNANT WOMEN REFERRED TO HEALTH CARE CENTERS IN ZAHEDAN, IRAN (2002-2003). AFRICAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 4, 642-645. 
WWW.ACADEMICJOURNALS.ORG/.../54412FC26078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">KHOUSHABI, F. AND SARASWATHI, G. (2010) IMPACT OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS ON BIRTH WEIGHT OF NEONATES IN ZAHEDAN CITY, IRAN. NUTRITION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 4, 339-344. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/20827351 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.4162/NRP.2010.4.4.339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">JELLIFFEE, D.B. (1966) THE ASSESSMENT OF THE NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF COMMUNITY. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, GENEVA. 
HTTP://WWW.WHO.INT/IRIS/HANDLE/10665/41780</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RAINVILLE, A.J. (1998) PICA PRACTICES OF PREGNANT WOMEN ARE ASSOCIATED WITH LOWER MATERNAL HEMOGLOBIN LEVEL AT DELIVERY. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 98, 293-296. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/9508011 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00069-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">COOKSEY, N.R. (1995) PICA AND OLFACTORY CRAVING OF PREGNANCY: HOW DEEP ARE THE SECRETS? BIRTH, 22, 129-137. 
WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/7575860 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1111/J.1523-536X.1995.TB00688.X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LOPEZ, L.B., LANGINI, S.H. AND PITA DE PORTELA, M.L. (2007) MATERNAL IRON STATUS AND NEONATAL OUTCOMES IN WOMEN WITH PICA DURING PREGNANCY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY &amp; OBSTETRICS, 98, 151-152. 
WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/17572424 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.IJGO.2007.03.038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NYARUHUCHA, C.N. (2009) FOOD CRAVINGS, AVERSIONS AND PICA AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA. TANZANIA JOURNAL OF HEALTH RESEARCH, 11, 29-34. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/19445102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48489-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">KETTANEH, A., ECLACHE, V., FAIN, O., SONTAG, C., UZAN, U., CARBILLON, L., STIRNEMANN, J. AND THOMAS, M. (2005) PICA AND FOOD CRAVING IN PATIENTS WITH IRON-DEFICIENCY ANEMIA: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY IN FRANCE. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 118, 185-188. WWW.NCBI.NLM.NIH.GOV/PUBMED/15694906  
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.AMJMED.2004.07.050</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>