<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJEpi</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Epidemiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7459</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojepi.2014.44025</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJEpi-50785</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Current Status and Correlates of Modern Family Planning Utilization in Hard to Reach Ethnic Minorities: The Case of Gumuz, Northwest Ethiopia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>olla</surname><given-names>Gedefaw</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dawit</surname><given-names>Muluneh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mekonen</surname><given-names>Aychiluhem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>GAMBY College of Medical Sciences, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Joint MPH Program, GAMBY College of Medical Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mollagedefaw@yahoo.com(OG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>188</fpage><lpage>198</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Cognizant of multifaceted challenge of unwanted pregnancy, Ethiopia strives to increase utiliza-tion of modern family planning across the nation. Therefore, update on the current status of family planning utilization especially in hard to reach ethnic minorities is critical. The objective of this study was to assess level, and correlates of modern contraceptive utilization in a hard to reach ethnic minorities. A community based study was conducted in Dangur District, Beneshangul Gumuz Regional State July, 2013. A total of 530 married women were included in the study. Structured questionnaire was data collection tool. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20 for windows. Possible association and their strength were measured using odds ratio at 95% CI. Family planning utilization was 18.7% while nearly 27% of study participants had ever used family planning methods. The following variables were predictors of family planning utilization: number of alive children [AOR: 3.31, 95% CI (1.41 - 7.20)], good knowledge [AOR: 2.18, 95% CI (1.35 - 3.52)] and positive attitude [AOR: 1.58, 95% CI (1.03 - 2.50)]. The most outstanding finding of this study was that more than 80% of study participants still believe that many children means high income, and nearly 60% of them believe that family planning utilization decreases confidence among couples. This study witnessed how successful Ethiopia is in addressing reproductive health service inequalities in hard to reach communities. However, misconceptions surrounding family planning, and culture associated desire to have large family size should be addressed in a culture sensitive manner so that this success would further bear fruits.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Family Planning</kwd><kwd> Benshangul-Gumuz</kwd><kwd> Hard to Reach</kwd><kwd> Ethnic Minorities</kwd><kwd> Ethiopia</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The twenty-third round of official United Nations population estimates and projections indicates that the 7.2 billion world population in mid-2013 is projected to reach 8.1 billion in 2025. This figure will increase to 10.9 billion by 2100 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref1">1</xref>] . The major segment of the projected population growth will take place in low and middle income countries of Africa and Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref3">3</xref>] . Over half of the increase is expected to occur in only eight countries. Ethiopia is one of them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Being the second most populous nations of Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref4">4</xref>] , Ethiopia is a prototype example of nations which has been facing multitudes of challenges following rapid population growth including environmental degradation, chronic food insecurity, high maternal, and child mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] . It is surprising to notice that the population of Ethiopia has doubled itself between 1980 and 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Population growth could worsen the current unacceptably high maternal and child mortality. It could also put further pressure on environment, and social services. Moreover, population growth increases global burden of disease, poverty, and conflict [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref2">2</xref>] . Such situations can be even worse in countries such as Ethiopia where inequality is a serious concern. Ethiopia is a mosaic of nationalities and peoples, having more than 80 different spoken languages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref10">10</xref>] . Addressing the issue of inequality has been a serious problem in Ethiopia. To address this serious concern, the country has established a decentralized federal structure with nine regional states and two city administrations supported with constitution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref11">11</xref>] . The Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia strongly believes that inequality in any sector could be better addressed through a federal system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Considering population growth as a serious challenge, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia has developed several modern policies, and strategies to culminate extreme poverty, to revive degraded environment, to reduce maternal and child mortality and finally to develop Ethiopia from the current lowest to middle income countries in the coming couples of decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>In this regard, several achievements have been registered in the country in various sectors including the health sector. Making Family Planning accessible to all families across the nation has been one of the successful interventions in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref13">13</xref>] . Family planning services began in the 1966 in Ethiopia with the establishment of the Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia (FGAE). Not until the 1980s, did the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) add family planning to its maternal and child health program. In the first national survey in 1990, the CPR was only 2.3% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Data on trends of family planning utilization in Ethiopia reveals that there is reduction in unmet need over the last 21 years as documented in 2000, 2005, and 2011 EDHS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref14">14</xref>] . However, level of family planning utilization and unmet need still varies from region to region in this Federal State [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] . Furthermore, most studies on level of family planning utilization and unmet need focus on regions with large population size such as Amhara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref15">15</xref>] , and Oromo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref17">17</xref>] while data on level of family planning utilization, and unmet need in emerging regions such as Benshangul Gumuz is scarce.</p><p>Therefore, the genuine struggle of the government to address inequality through decentralized government structure needs to be supported with current data. The finding of this study will help reflecting successes, and help depicting the remaining challenges of family planning services utilization in hard to reach ethnic minorities, for instance, Gumuz communities in Ethiopia.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods and Materials</title><p>Community based cross-sectional study was conducted in Danguar District of Benshangul Gumuz National Regional State in June, 2013. The Benishangul Gumuz National Regional state (BGRS) is one of the nine Federal Constituents of Ethiopia located in the Northwest parts of Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref11">11</xref>] . Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State consists of five ethnic groups: Gumuz, Berta, Shinasha, Mao and Komo. However, there are also other ethnic groups living in the region in which their composition is specified as follows: Amhara, Oromo, Shinasha etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref18">18</xref>] . According to the 2007 Ethiopian National population and housing census report, the total population of the Region was estimated to be 670,847 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The Region is divided into three Zones: Danguar District is one of the seven districts of Metekel Zone. This district is bounded by Pawe, Guba, Wombera &amp; Bulen Districts of the region and Amhara National Regional State in the East, West, South and North, respectively. Admistratively, Dangur district is divided into 27 Kebeles (the smallest level of government administration). This district was selected because the majority of the target population—Gumuz communities—are living (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Based on the 2007 National population and housing census of Ethiopia, the population of the district is approximately 40,781. Of these, 20,232 were females. There are two health centers, 27 health posts in the district (25, 26). The target population constitutes all married Gumuz women in child bearing age.</p><p>Gumuz communities were selected for this study because of the following reasons: they are living in less urbanized, in scattered manner with low infrastructure. Hence, they have maintained their cultural heritages. Moreover, Gumuz people are the second native majority in the region.</p><p>The sample size was calculated using single population proportion formula. Since data was not available for the study area, a 50% proportion of family planning utilization was taken to get maximum sample size.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50785-formula492"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1890124x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Where: n = the maximum sample size,</p><p>Z = standard normal distribution curve value for 95% CI which is 1.96,</p><p>P = Proportion (50%),</p><p>W = tolerable margin of sampling error= 0.05 and α = the level of significance= 0.05,</p><p>Non response rate = 10%.</p><p>Hence, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1890124x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The above sample size is for an infinite population (n &gt; 10,000). The estimated number of Gumuz married woman in the district was 4620. Therefore, the revised calculated sample size became</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50785-formula493"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1890124x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These multiplied with and 1.5 design effect plus 10% non response rate, the final calculated sample size was 585.</p><p>The sample size was distributed to the sampled Kebeles proportionate to the size of the households in the respective selected 10 kebeles out of the 17 kebeles in the district. For households with more than one woman aged 15 - 49 years, only one was selected using lottery method. When the selected house hold was closed during</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Administrative map of Benshangul Gumuz Regional State</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1890124x9.png"/></fig><p>data collection, three attempts were made before the household was excluded from the survey. When a selected household did not have a woman in reproductive age group, the next nearest household was considered.</p><p>Data were collected using commonly utilized structured questionnaires in Ethiopia including questionnaires used by Ethiopian demographic surveys. The questionnaire was originally prepared in English and its final version were translated into Amharic, and then back translated to English. Then, pre-test was conducted outside the study area. One day training was given for data collectors and supervisors. The training was focused on ethical aspect of research including privacy, confidentiality, and cultural sensitiveness and as to how to overcome cultural barriers during data collection. The data collection process was regularly checked by the supervisor and one of the investigators. To reduce non-response or reporting biases, interviews were conducted in places where other people could not overhear.</p><p>Practically data collection in this area was very difficult. To cop up with this challenge, the following techniques were implemented:</p><p>1) Data collection took place early in the morning before mothers left home.</p><p>2) The data collectors were selected from the local community members who were able to speak Amharic, well known and respected by the target communities. So that mothers could give the needed information to researcher. These helped us overcome the presumed challenges of data collection in the study area.</p><p>Data was analyzed using SPSS version 20 for windows. Logistic regression was fitted to assess possible association among variables, and strength of association was measured using odds ratio at 95% confidence interval.</p><p>Ethical Consideration: The study obtained Ethical clearance from GAMBY College of Medical Sciences. Written permission was also secured from the BGR Health Bureau. All the study participants were informed about the purpose of study, and their right to refuse. Privacy and confidentiality were maintained. Informed verbal consent was obtained from each study participant prior to the interview.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total of 530 women participated in the study. The response rate was 90%. About 60% of study participants were Muslim by religion, and nearly 90% were not able to read and write, and were farmer by occupation. The age of the study participants ranges from 15 to 49 with mean age of 29.4 &#177; 7.4 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants, Dangur Woreda, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency N = 530</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean = 29.4 &#177; 7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not able to read and write</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >461</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Able to read and write</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muslim</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orthodox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protestant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >475</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Government employ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>More than 50% considered themselves as poor. Majority of study participants 420 (79.2%) did not have radio. About 366 (69.1%) of participants had average monthly income of less than 500 birr (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Almost all study participants (99.6%) had history of pregnancy. Of them, nearly half (49.1%) had five or more pregnancies. Age at first marriage varies from 7 - 23 years. Mean age at first marriage was 14. Eighty four percent of respondents married before the age of 18 years and 48.6% became pregnant before the age of 18 years. Mean number of living children was 3.7 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-economic characteristics of respondents, Dangur District, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency N = 530</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possession of radio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly income (in Birr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >501 - 2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >no answer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perceived economy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Well to do</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Reproductive characteristics of study participants, Dangur District, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency N = 530</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No of pregnancies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Never</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean = 4.6 &#177; 2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No of alive children</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean = 3.7 &#177; 1.94 Age at first pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;26 Mean = 18 &#177; 3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age at first marriage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;20 Mean = 14 &#177; 2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>More than 80% of study participants had heard about modern family planning. Of these, nearly 80% of study participants knew injectables and 58.7 percent knew pills. The most frequently mentioned source of information for family planning were health professionals (79.7%), friends (39.8%), and radio (4.7%). The most commonly mentioned methods were injectables and pills (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows common misconceptions about family planning. As displayed in the table, nearly 60% of them think that using contraceptives will cause a loss of confidence between couples, about 35% think that contraceptives cause infertility, and more than 80% of them think that many children means high income.</p><p>About 20% of study participants were current users of modern contraceptive, and most of them claimed to use contraceptives in injection form (83%). About 8% of study participants claimed to have experience of taking modern contraceptive methods, and discontinued because of several reasons (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>More than 80%, and nearly 75% of study participants attribute culture, and desire for having more children not to use modern family planning methods. Besides, more than 40% of them attribute fear of side effect as a reason not to use family planning methods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Knowledge of study participants about types of family planning methods, Dangur Ditrict, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heard about MC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >435</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Known contraceptive method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pills</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inject able</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Norplant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Condom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IUCD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Misconceptions about contraceptives among Gumuz married women, Dangur District, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Assessment items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FP helps mother regain her strength</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >disagree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Child spacing helps improve the health of mothers and children</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FP practice will cause a loss of confidence between couples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contraceptive use causes infertility in a women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Many children improve family income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disagree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Utilization of modern contraceptive methods among Gumuz married women, Dangur District, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current use of contraceptive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contraceptive currently in use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pills</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Injection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Norplant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Discontinued</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ever used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source of contraceptive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health center</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Private clinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health post</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Reasons for not using modern family planning methods among married Gumuz women, Dangur District, 2013</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1890124x10.png"/></fig><p>Educational status of women, number of children, knowledge about and attitude towards family planning were found to have statistically significant association with utilization of family planning methods. For instance, those women with primary level of education were 3 times more likely to use modern family planning method than those who were not able to read and write [AOR = 3.60; 95% CI = (1.49 - 8.70)] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions</title><p>The major aim of this study was to assess level of modern family planning utilization and to identify factors associated to it. Being the second most populous nation of Africa, Ethiopia is a prototype example of nations which has been facing multitudes of challenges following rapid population growth including environmental degradation, chronic food insecurity, high maternal, and child mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Cognizant of these multi-dimensional challenges of population growth, Ethiopia has developed several policies,</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Factors associated with utilization of Modern Family Planning Methods among Gumuz Married women, Dangur District, 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Utilization of modern family planning</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >OR (95% CI)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >no</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >COR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOR</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education of woman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not able to read and write</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Able to read and write</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32 (0.61 - 2.87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08 (0.45 - 2.59)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.04 (1.37 - 6.73)<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60 (1.49 - 8.70)<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muslim</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orthodox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93 (0.52 - 1.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87 (0.47 - 1.60)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catholic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70 (0.65 - 4.35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81 (0.61 - 5.41)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62 (0.31 - 1.24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59 (0.28 - 1.22)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alive children</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74 (0.43 - 1.26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19 (0.55 - 2.58)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 (1.01 - 3.12)<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.31 (1.41 - 7.20)<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Attitude favorable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54 (1.02 - 2.39)<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58 (1.03 - 2.50)<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >unfavorable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >knowledgeable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16 (1.39 - 3.36)<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18 (1.35 - 3.52)<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >less knowledgeable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>and strategies to culminate extreme poverty, to revive degraded environment, to reduce maternal and child mortality and finally to develop Ethiopia from the current lowest to middle income countries in the coming couples of decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>In this regard, several achievements have been registered in the country in various sectors including the health sector. Making Family Planning accessible to all families across the nation has been one of the successful interventions in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>The finding of the present study revealed that current use of modern family planning by married Gumuz women was 18.7%. It was much lower than 2013 annual report of Dangur woreda (60%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref20">20</xref>] . Possible explanation for this could be that the data from the district could have some intentional inflation. A research done by Tigist, 2012 in Afar Region cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref21">21</xref>] indicated that communities in ethnic minorities such as Afar do not like to utilize modern family planning methods for they like to increase their population.</p><p>A study done in Southern Tigray (2011) revealed that contraceptive prevalence was (50.9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref22">22</xref>] . This figure is nearly three times higher than the finding of the present study. Possible explanation for this discrepancy could be the following: difference in population characteristics, culture, and access to information to family planning. It is very likely that communities in Southern Tigray have been exposed for information to family planning and other health related issues than communities in Gummuz. Fortunately, the current government structure has addressed such discrepancies by establishing a Federal State based on ethnic distribution of populations in the country- ethnicity as pillar for geographic regionalization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The result of the present study revealed that knowledge on family planning has statistically significant association with current contraception use. More than 80% of study participants in the present study claimed to have heard about modern family planning, and similar proportion of them knew injectables. This finding is consistent with research findings in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref23">23</xref>] and abroad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>It is surprising to notice that how knowledge about modern family planning is successfully transferred to com- munities in Ethiopia even in hard to reach ones. This achievement can be considered as a real success for the Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia because this much has been achieved in hard to reach communities within less than two decades even before Information Education and Communication (IEEC) and Behavioural Change Communication Materials have been prepared using local languages.</p><p>This indicates how Federal and Regional Governments are committed to address the reproductive health needs of families in Ethiopia. The level of commitment of the Ethiopian Government in relation to success of family planning utilization has been recognized by USAID Africa Burea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref13">13</xref>] recently. This paper indicated that Ethiopia is one of the three African nations with remarkable success in Family planning.</p><p>It is very likely that this good level of knowledge about family planning would decrease misconception surrounding modern family planning utilization. Studies indicate that knowledge about family planning is a prerequisite to obtaining access to and using a suitable contraceptive method in a timely and effective manner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Study participants did mentioned several reasons for not using modern family planning methods. In the present study, more than 80% of study participants believed that many children mean high income, and hence the reason not to use modern family planning was desire to have more children for more than nearly 75% of the study participants. This result is supported by different findings from Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>In the present study about 25%, and 40% of study participants claimed that they did not use modern family planning because their husbands did not want, and because of fear of side effect, respectively. This finding is con- sistent with findings from Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>Moreover, the findings of this study showed that culture was found to be number one obstacle to the use of modern family planning methods. In this locality, marriage is by exchange. If a family has several daughters, the family has a chance to get several potential wives as an exchange [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref26">26</xref>] . In this locality women are the most important working force. Therefore, men would like to have several wives. The Gumuz communities are well known for polygamy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Cultural barrier of modern family planning utilization is different in different area. For instance, the research conducted in Ruanda revealed that family size is largely determined by the male partner. The preference for boys over girls was described as overruling concern for family size. According to Delphine (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref27">27</xref>] , Rwandan women prefer to give birth to boys in order to please their husbands and in-laws.</p><p>In Muslim dominated countries such as Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref28">28</xref>] , Egypt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref29">29</xref>] and Malaysia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref30">30</xref>] the justification not to use family planning is religious. In the present study, region was not a statistically significant factor. This difference might be partly explained by the fact that in Gumuz communities culture rather than religion that determines whether people use family planning or not.</p><p>In the present study, those women who had at least primary education had good attitude to modern contraceptive use than those women who could not read and write. Studies elsewhere revealed a similar pattern of relationship between educational status and maternal health service including family planning utilization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>The present study revealed that misconceptions related to modern family planning are rampant in this particular community. Culture associated desire for getting large number of children, and the perception that utilization of modern contraceptive reduces confidence or rather trust among partners are the two most important ones that require discussion at this point.</p><p>The reflected desire to have large number of children in Gummuz communities is in line with the theory of demographic transition. This theory states that first child mortality should drastically decrease before parents do agree to decrease the number of children they want to have [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref32">32</xref>] . Child mortality is Gumuz communities is one of the highest in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>One of the most important misconceptions is in this study was that utilization of family planning including condom decreases confidence or trust. This is in line with findings in Behavioural surveillance survey studies in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50785-ref33">33</xref>] . However, the good thing about the aforementioned misconceptions is that they are change amenable if targeted health education is given.</p><p>The major limitation of this study is that study participants were only women while men decide on most of the family affaires in this communities. However, this study brought the current status of modern family planning utilization in hard to reach ethnic minorities about whom literature are scarce.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study witnessed how successful Ethiopia is in addressing reproductive health service inequalities in hard to reach communities. However, misconceptions surrounding family planning, and culture associated desire to have large family size should be addressed in a culture sensitive manner in Gummuz communities so that this success would further bear fruits. In this regard, Information Education Communication, and Behavioral Change Communication materials and messages should be prepared in local language to facilitate understanding to the wider community. Further research involving husbands is recommended.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Authors would like to appreciate Bahir Dar University and GAMBY College of Medical Sciences for opening an innovative joint MPH program which allows many MPH candidates to earn their 2<sup>nd</sup> degree in public health including BM. We are also very much grateful for study participants, and data collectors.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.50785-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations Economic and Social Affairs (2013) World Population Prospects. The 2012 Revision. Highlights and Advance Tables. New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cleland, J., Bernstein, S., Ezeh, A., Faundes, A., Glasier, A. and Innis, J. (2006) Family Planning: The Unfinished Agenda. The Lancet Sexual and Reproductive Health Series.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Commission of the European Communities (2008) Demographic Challenges for European Region. Brussels.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USAID (2010) The Cost of Family Planning in Ethiopia. USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health of Ethiopia. Family planning in Ethiopia 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (2011) National Guidelines for Family Planning in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (2010) Health Sector Development Programme IV 2010/11-2014/15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Habtu, A. (2003) Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia: Background, Present Conditions and Future Prospects. Paper Submitted to the Second EAF International Symposium on Contemporary Development Issues in Ethiopia. The Ghion Hotel Addis Ababa Ethiopia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balcha, B.G. (2007) Restructuring State and Society: Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia. SPIRIT—Doctoral Programme Aalborg University Denmark SPIRIT Ph.D. Series. Thesis No. 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Constitution of Ethiopia (1994) The Nation, Nationalities and Peoples of Ethiopia. Addis Abeba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Growth and Transformation Plan (2012) 2010/11-2014/15. Addis Abeba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USAID/Africa Bureau, USAID/Population and Reproductive Health, Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health, Malawi Ministry of Health, Rwanda Ministry of Health (2012) Three Successful Sub-Saharan Africa Family Planning Programs: Lessons for Meeting the MDGs.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayele, W., Tesfaye, H., Gebreyes, R. and Gebreselassie, T. (2013) Trends and Determinants of Unmet Need for Family Planning and Programme Options, Ethiopia. Further Analysis of the EDHS, 2000, 2005 and 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Portner, C., Beegle, K. and Christiaensen, L. (2013) Does Family Planning Reduce Fertility? Evidence from Rural Ethiopia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ieda, A. (2012) Perceptions and Behaviour Related to Family Planning in a Rural Area in the Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Thesis, Department of Community Medicine Institute of Health and Society, the Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo, Oslo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dibaba</surname><given-names> Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Factors Influencing Women’s Intention to Limit Child Bearing in Oromia, Ethiopia</article-title><source> The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 28</fpage>-<lpage>33</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benshangul-Gumuz Regional State Website. http://www.benishangulgumuz.gov.et/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ethiopian National Population and Housing Census Report. Addis Ababa, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Annual Report of Dangur District. Metekel Zone, Benishangul Gumuz Regional State , Ethiopia, 2013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayele, W., Tesfaye, H., Gebreyes, R. and Gebreselassie, T. (2013) Trends and Determinants of Unmet Need for Family Planning and Programme Options, Ethiopia Further Analysis of the 2000, 2005, and 2011. Demographic and Health Surveys.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bayray</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Assessment of Male Involvement in Family Planning among Men in the Southern Eastern Zone of Tigiray</article-title><source> Ethiopia Scholarly Journal of Medicine</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>10</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Girma, E. (2011) Married Women’s Decision Making Power on Modern Contraceptive Use in Urban and Rural Southern Ethiopia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lwelamira, J., Mnyamagola, G. and Msaki, M.M. (2012) Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) towards Modern Contraceptives among Married Women of Reproductive Age in Mpwapwa District, Central Tanzania. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 235-245.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Creanga</surname><given-names> A.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Low Use of Contraception among Poor Women in Africa: An Equity Issue</article-title><source> Bulletin of the World Health Organization</source><volume> 89</volume>,<fpage> 258</fpage>-<lpage>266</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cultural, B.K. (2007) Practices that Affected the Status of Women in Benishangul Gumuz Mandura Woreda. Addis Abeba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinault, D. (2007) Cultural Barriers to Family Planning. Ruwanda.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey, 2006-2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eltomy, E.M., Saboula, N.E. and Hussein, A.A. (2013) Barriers Affecting Utilization of Family Planning Services among Rural Egyptian Women. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 19, 400-408.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Najafi, F., Rahman, H.A. and Juni, M.H. (2011) Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Practices among Selected Married Women in a Public University in Malaysia. Global Journal of Health Science, 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lakew, Y., Reda, A.A., Tamene, H., Benedict, S. and Deribe, K. (2013) Geographical Variation and Factors Influencing Modern Contraceptive Use among Married Women in Ethiopia: Evidence from a National Population Based Survey. Reproductive Health, 10, 52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirk, D. (1996) Demographic Transition Theory. Population Studies, 50, 361-387. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149536</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50785-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (2002) HIV/AIDS Behavioral Surveillance Survey (BSS) Round one, Ethiopia.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>