<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-1985</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oje.2014.415078</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJE-51431</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Does Linear Canopy Openings in a Lowland Atlantic Tropical Forest Cause Edge Effects on Seedling Communities?
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ablo</surname><given-names>J. F. Pena Rodrigues</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mariana</surname><given-names>A. Iguatemy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcelo</surname><given-names>T. Nascimento</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>pablojfpr@hotmail.com(AJFPR)</email>;<email>m_iguatemy@hotmail.com(MAI)</email>;<email>mtn@uenf.br(MTN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>11</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>15</issue><fpage>945</fpage><lpage>949</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Edge effects and linear canopy openings may change ecological patterns and processes on forests. Here we investigate if these openings in a lowland Brazilian Atlantic forest cause edge effects on seedlings. We sampled seedling communities at forest edges near to two linear canopy openings (gas pipeline and power line) and in interiors far from edges. Comparisons between the seedling communities were performed to access edge effects. Density and basal area patterns were compared using, hierarchical two-way ANOVAs and the number of newly germinated seedlings, mortality and resprouts were compared by one-way ANOVAs. The results showed that edge effects of linear canopy openings affect seedling communities leading to low densities on edges that showed less favorable conditions for arrival, establishment and initial survival. The basal area patterns were not affected by edge effects apparently by the resistance of the seedlings that have more than 4 mm diameter. Therefore, linear canopy openings caused edge effects, which determine low seedling densities on edges. However this pattern is not due to increase mortality on these edges, but probably caused by the reduction on germination and establishment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Forest Regeneration</kwd><kwd> Fragmentation</kwd><kwd> Disturbance</kwd><kwd> Human-Modified Habitats</kwd><kwd> Secondary Forests</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Habitat loss and fragmentation are among the most evident threats to biodiversity and the related edge effects may drastically change ecosystems structure and function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref6">6</xref>] . The Brazilian Atlantic forest, one of the world’s species-rich ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref7">7</xref>] , was reduced to 11.7% of its original cover [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref8">8</xref>] and currently is restricted to remnant fragments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref10">10</xref>] that are potentially highly exposed to several threats. In this case, edge effects are important drivers of change when considering the physical and biotic alterations related to such artificial boundaries. Changes in resource availability, species interactions and disturbance patterns are expected in such human-modified habitats. Many studies have shown the consequences of edges effects in tropical forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref11">11</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref16">16</xref>] , but they are almost unknown the precise consequences on Atlantic forest regeneration patterns and, only recently, it was found that the creation of linear canopy openings caused edge effects on understory communities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Plant communities may also vary in impact resistance and resilience, and then in the human-induced complex scenario, it is also expected that local edge effects are site-specific and related to disturbance history. On the other hand linear canopy openings, such as gas pipeline and power lines are relatively controlled field experiments and allow us inferences about edge effects that are probably not confounded by other disturbances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref18">18</xref>] . Here we analyzed edge effect patterns on Atlantic forest woody seedlings. In this study, seedling communities at forest edges, adjacent to the linear canopy openings, and thus gas pipeline and power line, were compared with forest interiors used as control sites.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The Uni&#227;o Biological Reserve (hereafter UNI&#195;O) is located in the state of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil (22˚27'30&quot;S, 42˚02'14&quot;W) inside one area of 2548 hectares. This protected area was created in 1998 mainly to preserve lowland Atlantic Forest remnants and the endangered Golden Lion Tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia L.). Local climate is tropical wet, corresponding to K&#246;eppen’s Am and the mean annual precipitation is around 1600 mm, with a slight dry season between April and September and the mean annual temperature is 22˚C. The local vegetation is the typical Brazilian lowland Atlantic rain forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref19">19</xref>] with a high richness of late-succes- sional tree species and a high basal area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref18">18</xref>] . However, native habitats in some areas were replaced by anthropogenic scenarios like two linear canopy openings called here the gas pipeline (GP) and the power line (PL). The GP was created in the 1980s, it is 25 m wide, and was frequently maintained to keep only a herbaceous vegetation. The power line opening was created in the 1960s, it is 100 m wide, and is covered by early successional vegetation. Therefore, forest edges close to these canopy openings are exposed to contrasting matrix vegetation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling Design</title><p>In November of the year 2000, twelve plots (20 m &#215; 50 m) subdivided into forty (5 m &#215; 5 m) sub-plots were placed at UNI&#195;O forests. Four plots were located in Gas pipeline forest edges (sites GP) and the other four in Power line forest edges (sites PL). Remaining four plots were placed at forest interiors (400 m far from any edge; sites INTERIOR). Seedlings, thus, individuals that have less than 1 m height and/or 10 mm diameter, were sampled using 10 micro-plots (2 m &#215; 1 m), stratified-randomly distributed within each sub-plot. Inside the micro- plots each individual plant had its diameter and height measured. Qualitative aspects of the individuals such as newly germinated seedlings (definition, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref20">20</xref>] ) and resprouting were also observed. After one year, thus, in November 2001, all individuals were re-measured and plots reanalyzed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Comparisons</title><p>Comparisons between seedlings density and basal area per micro-plot were performed using, hierarchical two- way ANOVAs (plot nested within site) followed by Tukey (HSD, p &lt; 0.05) a posteriori tests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref21">21</xref>] . All data without normal distribution were prior transformed to log<sub>10</sub>(x + 1). The number of newly germinated seedlings (in the years 2000 and 2001), recruitment (2000-2001), one year mortality (period 2000-2001 year; deads) and resprouts (in 2001 year) in each plot was obtained by sum of all individuals inside the micro-plots and these totals per plot were compared by one-way ANOVAs followed by Tukey (HSD, p &lt; 0.05) a posteriori tests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The GP and PL edges always showed lower seedling densities when compared to the INTERIOR. In the years 2000 and 2001, recruitment was extremely low in edge sites, even excluding the expected pattern of high mortality of newly germinated seedlings. However, the mean basal area was similar between the sites, suggesting that the local seedlings are able to resprout or resist even facing the edge effects. Moreover, seedlings with more than 4 mm diameter apparently were more resistant to direct damage or edge effects and this fact was very important to the basal area patterns (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Edge effects are important ecological filters for plant establishment, survival, and growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref23">23</xref>] and here the edge sites, thus, gas pipeline (GP) and power line (PL), showed less favorable conditions for establishment and initial survival of seedlings. Some years after the fragmentation, in the phase called “stagnation”, seedling densities at the edges tend to be lower when compared to the forest interior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref24">24</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref28">28</xref>] . These reductions may be caused by several factors such as the small recruitment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref29">29</xref>] which can be originated from biotic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref30">30</xref>] or abiotic causes mainly derived from changes in disturbance regimes, species interactions and resource availability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>Nevertheless, lower densities on edges may also be caused by limitations on the arrival of seeds. On tropical rainforests the dispersal in space, mediated by animals, may be negatively affected by the fragmentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref32">32</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref35">35</xref>] . In small forest fragments may also be a lower recruitment of seedlings of animal dispersed species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref32">32</xref>] . In fact in some Atlantic Forest areas, an interruption in the dispersal processes by vertebrates may lead to a dominance of pioneer species with small seeds especially on edges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref36">36</xref>] . The pattern of more abundance of disturbance-tolerant species in edges was previously observed for understorey plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref17">17</xref>] and trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref18">18</xref>] at the Uni&#227;o Biological Reserve. Therefore, these linear canopy openings may contribute to change continually and permanently the patterns of occurrence of dispersal fauna, resulting in changes in the arrival of seeds in the adjacent forests.</p><p>The small seedlings are very susceptible to disturbances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref38">38</xref>] then it would be expected that these individuals had higher mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref39">39</xref>] . On the other hand, observing the habitat, younger edges and contrasting limits (edge vs. matrix) in general have more intense effects on remnants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51431-ref41">41</xref>] . Thus, gas pipeline (GP) showed the most unfavorable condition for seedlings with observed high mortality and lower recruitment.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Linear canopy openings may cause edge effects, promoting low seedling densities on edges by the reduction on germination and establishment. Therefore, these types of edge effects are distinct from those observed in typicaltropical forest fragments where the low densities are caused mainly by increase in mortality.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparisons between seedling communities on the localities forest interior (IN), gas pipeline (GP) and power line (PL) at Uni&#227;o Biological Reserve, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Densities (n) and basal areas (mm<sup>2</sup>) per micro-plot were compared by two-way ANOVAs (nesting plot in locality). The number of individuals newly germinated, recruited, deads and resprouted per plot were compared by one way ANOVAs. Marked (<sup>*</sup>) F values indicates significant differences between localities and means (&#177;standard deviation) followed by the same letter (a or b, on the lines) do not differ significantly (Tukey-type test, p &lt; 0.05)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locality</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Forest interior</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gas pipeline</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Power line</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >ANOVA</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean density micro-plot<sup>−1</sup> (n)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7a &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6b &#177; 1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3b &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 108) = 6.43<sup>*</sup>; p &lt; 0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean basal area micro-plot<sup>−1</sup> (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122 &#177; 1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103 &#177; 3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106 &#177; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 108) = 0.21; p &lt; 0.807</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Newly germinated (n) 2000 yr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.7a &#177; 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0b &#177; 4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2b &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 9) = 9.95<sup>*</sup>; p &lt; 0.630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2001 yr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7 &#177; 8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2 &#177; 5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 9) = 4.3; p &lt; 0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>*</sup>Recruitment (n)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.7a &#177; 14.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0b &#177; 6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14ab &#177; 9.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 9) = 5.0<sup>*</sup>; p &lt; 0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>*</sup>Deads (n)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.2a &#177; 12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26ab &#177; 20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7b &#177; 7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 9) = 4.58<sup>*</sup>; p &lt; 0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resprouts (n)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2 &#177; 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5 &#177; 5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7 &#177; 8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F(2, 9) = 1.58; p &lt; 0.257</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Data without normal distribution were transformed to log<sub>10</sub>(x + 1). For unequal n’s the Tukey test used was Spojotvoll/Stoline. <sup>*</sup>Recruitment and <sup>*</sup>Deads are based on one year period (2000 to 2001 year).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Dr. Andrea Costa and one anonymous referee for valuable suggestions which improved the manu- script. We are very grateful to Adilson da Silva and Adilson Pintor for fieldwork support. We also thank the Funda&#231;&#227;o Flora and PETROBRAS for financial support (research grant number 6000.0023998.06.02 to Programa Mata Atl&#226;ntica/Pablo J.F.P. Rodrigues), the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conserva&#231;&#227;o da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) and the Uni&#227;o Biological reserve staff for logistical facilities, A. Costa for linguistic advice, and UENF/FENORTE for granting a Phd’s fellowship to P.J.F.P. Rodrigues.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.51431-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lovejoy, T.E., Bierregaard-Jr., R.O., Rylands, A.B., Malcon, J.R., Quintela, C.E., Harpe, L.H., Brown Jr., K.S., Powell, A.H., Powell, G.V.N., Schubart, H.O.R. and Hays, M.B. (1986) Edge and Other Effects of Isolation on Amazon Forest Fragments. In: Soulé, M.E., Ed., Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 257-285.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. and Margules, C.R. (1991) Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review. Conservation Biology, 5, 18-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malcon, J.R. (1994) Edge Effects in Central Amazonia Forest Fragments. Ecology, 75, 2438-2445.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940897</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murcia, C. (1995) Edge Effects in Fragmented Forests: Implications for Conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 58-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira-Filho, A.T., Mello, J.M. and Scolforo, J.R.S. (1997) Effects of Past Disturbance and Edges on Tree Community Structure and Dynamics within a Fragment of Tropical Semideciduous Forest in South-Eastern Brazil. Plant Ecology, 131, 45-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009744207641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurance, W.F. (2002) Hyperdynamism in Fragmented Habitats. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13, 595-602.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02086.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peixoto, A.L. and Gentry, A. (1990) Diversidade e composicao florística da mata de tabuleiro na Reserva Florestal de Linhares (Espírito Santo, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Botanica, 13, 19-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C., Ponzoni, F.J. and Hirota, M.M. (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How Much Is Left, and How Is the Remaining Forest Distributed? Implications for Conservation. Biological Conservation, 142, 1141-1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Fonseca, G.A.B. and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35002501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morellato, L.P.C. and Haddad, C.F.B. (2000) Introduction: The Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica, 32, 786-792.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00618.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams-Linera, G. (1990) Vegetation Structure and Environmental Conditions of Forest Edges in Panama. Journal of Ecology, 78, 356-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bierregaard, R.O., Lovejoy, T.E., Kapos, V., Dos Santos, A.A. and Hutchings, R.W. (1992) The Biological Dynamics of Tropical Rainforest Fragments. BioScience, 42, 859-866. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1312085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kapos, V., Wandelli, E., Camargo, J.L. and Ganade, G. (1997) Edge-Related Changes in Environment and Plant Responses Due to Forest Fragmentation in Central Amazonia. In: Laurance, W.F. and Bierregaard-Jr., R.O., Eds., Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 33-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurance, W.F., Ferreira, L.V., Rankin-de-Merona, J.M., Laurance, S.G., Hutchings, R.W. and Lovejoy, T.E. (1998) Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Recruitment Patterns in Amazonian Tree Communities. Conservation Biology, 12, 460-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97175.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurance, W.F., Pérez-Salicrup, D., Delamonica, P., Fearnside, P.M., D’angelo, S., Jerozolinski, A., Pohl, L. and Lovejoy, T.E. (2001) Rain Forest Fragmentation and the Structure of Amazonian Liana Communities. Ecology, 82, 105-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0105:RFFATS]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, M.A., Grillo, A.S. and Tabarelli, M. (2004) Forest Edge in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Drastic Changes in Tree Species Assemblages. Oryx, 38, 389-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605304000754</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prieto, P.V., Sansevero, J.B.B., Garbin, M.L., Braga, J.M.A. and Rodrigues, P.J.F.P. (2014) Edge Effects of Linear Canopy Openings on Understory Communities in a Lowland Atlantic Tropical Forest. Applied Vegetation Science, 17, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodrigues, P.J.F.P. (2004) A vegetacao da Reserva Biológica Uniao e os efeitos de borda na Mata Atlantica fragmentada. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, UENF, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veloso, H.P., Rangel-Filho, A.L.R. and Lima, J.C.A. (1991) Classificacao da vegetacao brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Garwood, N.C. (1996) Functional Morphology of Tropical Tree Seedlings. In: Swaine, M.D., Ed., The Ecology of Tropical Forest Tree Seedling, UNESCO, Parthenon, Paris, Carnforth, 59-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahai, H. and Ageel, M.I. (2000) The Analysis of Variance: Fixed, Random and Mixed Models. Birkhauser Boston, Boston. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1344-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zar, J. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sizer, N. and Tanner, E.V.J. (1999) Responses of Woody Plant Seedlings to Edge Formation in a Lowland Tropical Rainforest, Amazonia. Biological Conservation, 91, 135-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00076-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Turton, S.M. and Freiburger, H.J. (1997) Edge and Aspect Effects on the Microclimate of a Small Tropical Forest Remnant on the Atherton Tableland, Northeastern Australia. In: Laurence, W.F. and Bierregaard, R.O., Eds., Tropical Forest Remnants, The University of Chicago, Chicago, 45-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benitez-Malvido, J. (1998) Impact of Forest Fragmentation on Seedling Abundance in a Tropical Rain Forest. Conservation Biology, 12, 380-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96295.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benítez-Malvido, J. and Lemus-Albor, A. (2005) The Seedling Community of Tropical Rain Forest Edges and Its Interaction with Herbivores and Pathogens. Biotropica, 37, 301-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00031.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tomimatsu, H. and Ohara, M. (2004) Edge Effects on Recruitment of Trillium camschatcense in Small Forest Fragments. Biological Conservation, 117, 509-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bach, C.E., Kelly, D. and Hazlett, B.A. (2005) Forest Edges Benefit Adults, but Not Seedlings, of the Mistletoe Alepis flavida (Loranthaceae). Journal of Ecology, 93, 79-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00961.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jules, E.S. (1998) Habitat Fragmentation and Demographic Change for a Common Plant: Trillium in Old-Growth Forest. Ecology, 79, 1645-1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1645:HFADCF]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cadenasso, M.L. and Pickett, T.A. (2000) Linking Forest Edge Structure to Edge Function: Mediation of Herbivore Damage. Journal of Ecology, 88, 31-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00423.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ries, L., Fletcher, R.J., Battin, J. and Sisk, T.D. (2004) Ecological Responses to Habitat Edges. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 35, 491-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordeiro, N.J. and Howe, H.F. (2001) Low Recruitment of Trees Dispersed by Animals in African Forest Fragments. Conservation Biology, 15, 1733-1741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99579.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordeiro, N.J. and Howe, H.F. (2003) Forest Fragmentation Severs Mutualism between Seed Dispersers and an Endemic African Tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14052-14056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2331023100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galetti, M., Donatti, C.I., Pires, A.S., Guimaraes Jr., P.R. and Jordano, P. (2006) Seed Survival and Dispersal of an Endemic Atlantic Forest Palm: The Combined Effects of Defaunation and Forest Fragmentation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 151, 141-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00529.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cramer, J.M., Mesquita, R.C.G., Bentos, T.V., Moser, B. and Williamson, G.B. (2007) Forest Fragmentation Reduces Seed Dispersal of Duckeodendron cestroides, a Central Amazon Endemic. Biotropica, 39, 709-718.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00317.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Melo, F.P.L., Dirzo, R. and Tabarelli, M. (2006) Biased Seed Rain in Forest Edges. Biological Conservation, 132, 50-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harper, J.L. (1977) Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London, 842.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Whitmore, T.C. (1997) Tropical Forest Disturbance, Disappearance and Species Loss. In: Laurance, W.F. and Bierregaard, R.O., Eds., Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 3-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scariot, A. (2000) Seedling Mortality by Litterfall in Amazonian Forest Fragments. Biotropica, 32, 662-669.http://dx.doi.org/10.1646/0006-3606(2000)032[0662:SMBLIA]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mesquita, R.C.G., Delamonica, P. and Laurance, W.F. (1999) Effect of Surrounding Vegetation on Edge-Related Tree Mortality in Amazonian Forest Fragments. Biological Conservation, 91, 129-134.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00086-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51431-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harper, K.A., Macdonald, S.E., Burton, P.J., Chen, J., Brosofske, K.D., Saunders, S.C., Euskirchen, E.S., Roberts, D., Jaiteh, M.S. and Essen, P.E. (2005) Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes. Conservation Biology, 19, 768-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>