<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-1985</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oje.2014.414074</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJE-50904</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of Characteristics Floristico-Edaphic of the Steppes at Alfa (&lt;i&gt;Stipa tenacissima&lt;/i&gt; L.) in the Saida Region (Western Algeria)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>kkacha</surname><given-names>Hasnaoui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hassiba</surname><given-names>Meziane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amine</surname><given-names>Habib Borsali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Bouazza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Ecology and Natural Ecosystems Management, University of Tlemcen, Tlemcen, Algeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Sciences, University Dr. Tahar Moulay, Saida, Algeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>okhasnaoui2001@Yahoo.fr(KH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>14</issue><fpage>883</fpage><lpage>891</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  To establish an assessment of floristic and edaphic characteristics of steppe formations we conducted a phytoecological study on a local scale by comparing the current plant diversity and soil in three (3) stations representative of the vegetation to alfa (Stipa tenacissima L.) located south of Saida (western Algeria). The relations between the station, the vegetation and the characteristics of soils in the steppe are very imperfectly known. This study intends to analyze the relationship between floristic composition and edaphic parameters of the steppe at alfa. Anthropogenic pressures on plant structure are different imbalance resulting in one ecological. The floristic and edaphic data have been the subject of a factorial correspondence analysis (A.F.C). The floristic inventory denotes a regressive dynamics of the formations at alfa passing from one site to another. Thus 39 plant species have been inventoried in the site in good condition, against 26 species for the moderately degraded site and 16 species only for the damaged site. The coupled results between species and edaphic parameters show the relations between the plant diversity and the physico-chemical characteristics of the soils. The statistical analyses do appear a strong correlation between floristic composition, the state of vegetation and the edaphic parameters.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Evaluation</kwd><kwd> Steppe</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Stipa tenacissima&lt;/i&gt; L.</kwd><kwd> Soil Analysis</kwd><kwd> Plant Diversity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Steppe plant formations of North Africa are the result of the combined action of climatic factors and old and moderate anthropogenic pressures. The agro-sylvo-pastoral balance observed during the latter centuries has been broken in recent years by growing demographic pressure and changes in production systems (extensive sheep rearing and mechanized agriculture).</p><p>Abdelguerfi and Laouer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref1">1</xref>] found that, for several years, in the countries of the Maghreb an agro-sylvo-pas- toral imbalance settled and manifested itself by a degradation of the pastoral and forest potential.</p><p>In Algeria the steppe regions represent 9% of the territory and are real areas of steppe rangelands. Their population is composed mainly of pastoralists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref2">2</xref>] . In 1971, the works of Le Hou&#233;rou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref3">3</xref>] showed that the steppe of Algeria was satisfactory and their perennial aboveground phytomass was of the order of 800 to 1500 kg MS/ha (dry mass per hectare) between 1950 and 1970. The same author noted in 1985 that perennial biomass was less than 200 kg MS/ha and the islets of degradation had became jointifs and covered considerable expanses.</p><p>The phenomenon of degradation of the steppe formations, found that there was a 40-year, trained more and more alarming desertification and translated on the ground by a modification of the component of the ecosystem (flora, fauna, soil and its elements, habitats) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The further restructuring of the Algerian steppe area in recent years was characterized by the development of agglomerations and the sedentarization of nomads in a fragile space. The highlands territories have been occupied by tens of thousands of people; there is barely more than a century and currently this is occupied by several million people. These changes have the most disturbing ecological consequences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref7">7</xref>] . The former pastoralists and occasional farmers have become one of the workings of the economy of the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref9">9</xref>] . The degradation of the steppe spaces is mainly due to the increase of livestock and overgrazing. The increase of the population and extensive farming has harmful consequences on the future of natural resources already weakened by climate pejorations.</p><p>These socio-cultural changes are accompanied by important qualitative and quantitative changes aboveground phytomass following a decrease and/or disappearance of species with good pastoral values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref10">10</xref>] , leaving room for species not palatable (spiny or toxic species) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref12">12</xref>] . It appears that overall pastoral production in these rangelands is marked by a very significant decline. Rapid and intense changes have been remarked in these areas under the growing demand of the people.</p><p>Given the degradation of these natural ecosystems, phytomass distribution seems to be linked to certain soil parameters (particle size, organic matter, pH, electrical conductivity, depth). These parameters have been studied, particularly for soil-vegetation relationships in the steppe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref17">17</xref>] . In the wilaya of Sa&#239;da the rangelands extend over an area of 163,063 ha and are representing a total area of 24.1% and are located in the municipalities of Moulay Larbi, Sidi Ahmed, Maamoura and Skhouna. There are four types of steppe rangelands: Stipa, Artemisia, Atriplex and salsolaceae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>To identify the dynamics of vegetation and edapho-resources we have inventoried the flora and evaluated the characteristics edaphic relating to perimeters of alfa (Stipa tenacissima L.) located in the municipality of M&#226;amoura (south of Sa&#239;da). This work fits in tracking the physiognomy change of natural ecosystems exposed to anthropogenic stress on one hand and the relationship between the degradation of the site to Stipa on the other hand.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Physical Layout and Choice of Stations</title><p>The study area is located in the southern part of the wilaya of Sa&#239;da (western Algeria). It is naturally limited by a series of Djebel oriented north to northeast with Djebel Sidi Youssef (1338 m) and Djebel Harchoune (1259 m). These mountains are arranged in a southwest and north and are bowing to the south in the direction of high steppe plains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The human impact on ecosystems in the study area is quite contrasting. Thus the choice of stations was motivated by the persistence at alfa locally little or not damaged. This physiognomic descriptor has allowed us to identify tree stations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>):</p><p>1) Perimeter at alfa in good condition (Site 1) = A.B.V;</p><p>2) Perimeter to moderately degraded at alfa (Site 2) = A.M.D;</p><p>3) Perimeter at alfa damaged (Site 3) = A.D.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of the study sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.B.V</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.M.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.D</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Geographic coordinates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0˚35'28&quot;W, 34˚41'11&quot;N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0˚36'19&quot;W, 34˚40'9&quot;N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0˚36'15&quot;W, 34˚59'1&quot;N</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Description of the stations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average recovery rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50% - 70%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30% - 50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 30%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average height of the tufts at alfa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 cm - 60 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 30 cm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average altitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1100 metres slope: 2% to 5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Climate</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >&#183; Mediterranean climate dry and hot summer season and winter rainy, cool and cold; &#183; Rainfall accumulation of last two decades is between 81.5 mm and 356 mm/yr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref12">12</xref>] ; &#183; Seasonal pattern: HAPE; &#183; Frost days: 37 (from December to March); &#183; Sirocco days: 11 (from May to August); &#183; Bioclimate: arid than cold variant.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location of the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1380303x5.png"/></fig><p>These three stations are representative of steppe rangelands. In each of these formations ten floristic surveys related to ten soils were made.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Methods</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Study of the Vegetation and Soil</title><p>The approach used to study vegetation has adapted to the characteristics of the steppe formations whose stands are discontinuous. We’ve made 10 floras by station surveys during the good phenological time. The surface of records must be sufficient to understand the maximum of plant and floristically homogeneous species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref20">20</xref>] . An area of 400 m<sup>2</sup> was chosen deliberately to our sampling. Inventory of vegetation was made based on the stigmatic abundance-dominance of Braun-Blanquet method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>The soil survey approach is based on 10 samples of soil by site. Each sample of soil was associated with a floristic survey and the vegetation (A.B.V; A.M.D and A.D). Soil samples have been made at the level of the rhizosphere of subjects to alfa.</p><p>The edaphic variables are measured on fine soil (less than 2 mm) and are as follows: granulometric analyses; pH, conductivity electrical (CE), total limestone (Ct, %), active limestone (Ca, %) and the organic matter (Mo) of a hand and the depth (Pr) of the profile to the limestone crust on the other.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Data Processing</title><p>To explain the links between vegetation and edaphic parameters we confronted the different results using at A.F.C. This approach allows highlighting the correlations between plant data and the parameters of the studied soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref23">23</xref>] . Plant species have been treated in presence-absence.</p><p>Digital processing was performed using the Minitab Version 15 Software.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Analytical Results of Soil</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Grading Results</title><p>The granulometric results obtain in laboratory are transferred on the diagram of textures, this allowed us to classify sites sampled. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> reflects the most significant results.</p><p>The results obtained show a fairly divided composition. On site A.D the amount of clay is reduced, it is between 5.2% and 10.3% and for the other sites it oscillates between 10.3% and 20.6%. As silt, measurements vary between 08.2% and 29.5% for A.M.D; 25.8 to 29.3% for the A.D and 28.1% to 42.8% for A.B.V. The percentage of the sands is important in three sites. The measures range from 60.3 and 71.3% for A.D and A.M.D sites however the A.B.V site presents a moderate percentage (values between 46.9 and 51.3%). Our results from the fraction of clay from the site 3 confirm the results of Trabut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref24">24</xref>] . However we note that in degraded and/or degraded places the percentage of clay is low. The role of the latter is to establish links between the elementary particles of the soil or with many substances (ions, organic molecules, water).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Physico-Chemicaly Results of the Soils Studied</title><p>The results are grouped in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The Analyses show a clear difference of Mo content from one site to another (A.B.V; A.M.D and A.D). Despite a grade of 0.91 per cent on average of Mo for A.B.V; it remains too low. According to estimates by Pouget [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref13">13</xref>] and Djebaili [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref15">15</xref>] the Mo average is 1% - 2% for steppe soils. As for the other sites (A.M.D; A.D) the values in Mo are respectively 0.5% and 0.3%.</p><p>Also we note a clear difference between the Pr of sites profiles. The global average of Pr of soil is 16 cm for A.B.V; 9.7 cm for A.M.D and 5.4 cm for the A.D. These values show a regression of Pr of soils and their truncation are net.</p><p>The rate of Ca is roughly equal in the three sites; it is 2.33% to 2.58% for A.B.V; 2.30% to 2. 83% for A.M.D and 2.05% to 2.73% for A.D.</p><p>The CE is close in the three sites, it oscillates respectively: 0.3 to 0.7 mmhos for A.B.V; 0.2 to 0.9 mmhos for A.M.D and 0.1 to 0.6 mmhos for A.D.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Analysis of Vegetation</title><p>The species inventoried using the keys Qu&#233;zel and Santa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50904-ref25">25</xref>] are grouped in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Species were coded and their calculated frequencies of occurrence. 39 species have been recorded in A.B.V, against 26 sp. for A.M.D and only 16 sp. for A.D.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Results of granulometric analyses of the studied soils</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clays (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Silt (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sands (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >A.B.V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >A.M.D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty-sandy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty-sandy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty-clayey-sandy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >A.D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty-sandy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty-sandy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silty-sandy</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Analytical results of the studied soils</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site of vegetation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N survey</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH KCl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CE mmhos</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ct%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mo%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr cm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >A.B.V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >A.M.D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >A.D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The comparative analysis of the frequencies and taxa shows the disappearance of many species along an anthropogenic gradient. Some species have adapted to the pressures and their frequencies have practically not changed (Poa bulbosa, Noaea mucronata, Astragalus incanus, Bromus rubens, Hordeum murinum); others have seen their increased frequency (Avena sterilis, Muscari comosum, Paronychia argentea, Peganum harmala, Senecio flavus, Artemisia herba alba) and others have disappeared (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). We have noted the appearance of a species in A.D (Helianthemum virgatum).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> List of species and their frequencies in the study sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.B.V frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.M.D frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.D frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Trend</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stipa tenacissima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >stte</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poa bulbosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pobu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stipa parviflora</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >stpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alkanna tinctoria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >alti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Astragalus sesameus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >asse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bassia muricata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bamu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diplotaxis virgata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >divi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erucaria uncata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >erun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muricaria prostrata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mupr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Noaea mucronata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >nomu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schismus barbatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >scba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scorzonera undulata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >scun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Senecio vulgaris</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sevu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Astragalus incanus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >asin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avena sterilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >aval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bromus rubens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >brru</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Centaurea pungens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cepu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eruca vesicaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >erve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hordeum murimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >homu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Astragalus armatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >asar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Helianthemum lippii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >heli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Helianthemum pilosum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hepi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iris sisyrinchium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >irsi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ornithogalum pyramidale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >orpy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reseda lutea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >relu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salvia verbenaca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >save</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saponaria glutinosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sagl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chrysanthemum coronarium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >chco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erucastrum leucanthum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >erle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marrubium vulgare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mavu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Matthiola livida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mali</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Muscari comosum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >muco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paronychia argentea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >para</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peganum harmala</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >peha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Senecio flavus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sefl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Artemisia herba alba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >arhe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ferula communis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Herniaria hirsuta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hehi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disappearance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Micropus bombicinus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mybo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Helianthemum virgatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hevi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Appearance</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The arrow refers to the tendency of the plant (evolution or regression).</p><p>This analysis shows a decline of plant biodiversity and the physiognomy of the route to alfa is changing. Taxas them toxic and/or thorny replace taxas them appetables and aboveground biomass is in clear regression.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Relationships Factors Soil-Vegetation</title><p>The interdependence of the parameters studied (floristic surveys and their edaphic values) is represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Floristic surveys, edaphic factors and plant species are represented by symbols accompanied by their coding (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Analysis of factorial:</p><p>The study of factorial 1-2, 1-3 and 2-3 shows significant variations, including those of edaphic factors, are organized according to axis 1 that represents the highest contribution (0.344 for axis 1; 0.222 for axis 2 and 0.155 for axis 3).</p><p>1-2 and 1-3 plans that will be represented and discussed contain most of the statistical information.</p><p>Plan 1-2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>):</p><p>Records are ordered according to axis 1, which corresponds to a gradient of degradation, from A.B.V in the positive part to A.D in contrast, with A.M.D intermediate position. The edaphic point of view, the point cloud is highly structured for the Ct, the Pr and the Mo. High Ct (Ct3) levels correspond to A.D site which is also characterized by a low Pr (Pr1) and the lowest rate in Mo (Mo1).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Factorial plan 1-2</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1380303x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Factorial plan 1-3</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1380303x7.png"/></fig><p>Interpretation of the axes:</p><p>Axis 1: Parameters edaphic Ct1, S1, Mo 3, Pk1, Pr 3 and L3 are well correlated and lie side axis 1 positive. The negative are: A1, Ct3, Pr1, Mo1, A2 and L2. Axis 1 is characterized by Mo and the negative Pr gradients toward the positive pole.</p><p>On the floristic map the species that are found side positive and are associated with edaphic (Ct1, S1, Mo 3, Pk1, Pr 3 and L3) parameters are as follows: Helianthemum lippii, Chrysanthemum coronarium, Stipa parviflora, Muricaria prostrata, Senecio vulgaris, Marrubium vulgare, Salvia verbenaca, Ornithogalum pyramidale, Matthiola livida, Centaurea pungens, Muscari comosum, Iris sisyrinchium, Eruca vesicaria et Reseda lutea. These taxa represent a facies at alfa in good condition (A.B.V).</p><p>The side negative of the axis is marked by the presence of the following species: Helianthemum virgatum, Senecio flavus, Micropus bombicinus, Avena alba, Peganum harmala and Paronychia argentea. These species are associated with the following soil parameters: A3, Ct3, Pr1, L2 and Mo1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). These indicators both floristic and edaphic indicate us a regression of vegetation and the physiognomy of the alfa facies is A.D.</p><p>Axis 2: On the positive side we find the following soil parameters: S3, L1, A3, Pr2 and Cd3. These parameters have a great affinity with A.M.D. A single species seems marked this facies is Herniaria hirsuta. The edaphic parameters: A1, Pr1 and Ct 3 strong and are in opposition with S3, Cd 3 and L1.</p><p>Plan 1-3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>):</p><p>It completes one given by the 1-2 plan. It may be noted, in addition to information from plan 1-2 (axis 1), that Erucaria uncata and Astragalus sesameus A.B.V-related and occur side axis 1 positive. The negative axis 1 Helianthemum virgatum, Senecio flavus and Paronychia argentea have an affinity with A1, Pr1, and Ct3 characterize A.D.</p><p>Axis 3: Saponaria glutinosa, Erucastrum leucanthum and Schismus barbatus species show some affinity characterized by a spatial proximity on the factorial and A3 side positive and negative axis 3 Herniaria hirsuta with A3 side.</p><p>Analysis of plan 1-3 confirmed evolutionary gradient of the vegetation and the soil depth. The edapho-flora combinations show the existing affinities between different parameters considered in the studied facies types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions and Recommendations</title><p>The strong climate-anthropogenic impact causes the disruption of ecosystems at alfa in the Algerian highlands. The residuals pockets at alfa observed in the region of Saida are threatened with extinction. One of these, used as control, allows studying the influence of damage anthropozoogenes on the floristic composition and some soil parameters of the two neighbouring sites, respectively moderately degraded and seriously affected.</p><p>The combination of floristic and edaphic data by the A.F.C highlights a degradation gradient associated with the floristic composition and three major soil variables: the depth of the soil, organic matter and the rate of total limestone.</p><p>The vegetation is mainly affected by a regression of the floristic richness that passes of 36 species for the control (A.B.V), 26 species for A.M.D and only 16 species for A.D (the more degraded stage). This regressive evolution translates into a decrease in the aboveground phytomass, a regression and an endangered species. We noticed the individualisation of a species (Helianthemum virgatum) in the more altered site. This dynamic causes a change in the appearance of the steppes with mainly the installation of a poor ecosystem herbal thorny and/or toxic (Peganum harmala, Ferula communis, Paronychia argentea, Senecio flavus, Micropus bombicinus).</p><p>Degraded stage is marked by a truncation of the soil, intense erosion which translates into a low depth, a small amount of organic matter and a high total limestone rate.</p><p>Edaphic and floristic data indicate unambiguously and convergently double erosion of natural resources (soil and biological). The trampling of livestock, the low recovery of the vegetation, the reduced structural stability of soils in an arid climate can causing a significant erosion by rain water or wind. Physico-chemical changes in soils and plant physiognomy induce a scarcity of biological potential. The dunes that are observed on the highlands are witnesses on these phenomena, and the situation calls for immediate measures of protection and restoration of the steppe ecosystems. This must involve the creation of a seed bank on one hand and a biological study of the species that structuring the steppes on the other hand.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.50904-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdelguerfi, A. and Laouer, M. (2000) Impact of Changes on the Genetic Resources of the Maghreb. Review Option Mediterranean, 39, 77-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nedjraoui, D. and Bedrani, S. (2008) Desertification in the Algerian Steppes. Causes, Impacts and Actions to Fight. Review Electronic Environmental, 8, 1-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Houerou, H.N. (1985) Regeneration Algerian Steppe. Mission Report of Consultation and Evaluation. Ministry of Agriculture Algiers, 37 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aidoud, A. and Touffet, J. (1996) Regression of Alfa (Stipa tenacissima L.), Perennial Grass, an Indicator of Desertification the Algerian Steppe. Sécheresse, 7, 187-193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Zerey, W., Bouiadjra, S.E.B., Benslimane, M. and Mederbal, K. (2009) The Steppe Ecosystem to Desertification: The Case of El Baydh Region—Algeria. Vertigo, 9. http://vertigo.revues.org/8821</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boucheta, T. and Boucheta, A. (2005) Degradation of Steppe Ecosystems and Sustainable Development Strategy. Development of a Methodology Applied to the Province of Naama (Algeria). Sustainability and Territories Journal. http://developpementdurable.revues.org/1339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadeid, M. (2006) The Spatial Changes and Social Space in Steppe. For Upper Southeastern Plains of Oran (Algeria). Thesis, University Franche-Comte, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boukhobza, M. (1976) Nomadism and Colonization Analysis of the Mechanisms of Disintegration and Dispersion of Traditional Pastoral Society in Algeria. Thesis, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Couderc, R. (1979) Geography and Development: The High Steppes South of Oran. Ph.D. Montpellier III, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Floret, C., Le Floc’h, E., Pontannier, R. and Romane, F. (1981) Dynamics of Ecological Systems of the Arid Zone. Application Development on Ecological Foundations of an Area of the Pre-Saharan Tunisia. Acta Oecologica. Oecologia Applicata, 2, 195-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kadi-Hanifi, H. (1998) Alfa in Algeria: Syntaxonomie, Vegetation-Environment Relationship, Dynamic and Forward-Looking. Ph.D. Thesis, USTHB.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasnaoui, O., Borsali, A.H. and Benaredj, A. (2014) Some Aspects of the Dynamics of Steppe Formations of South Oran (Western Algeria). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Plant Biodiversity, 27-29 March 2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pouget, M. (1980) The Relation Soil-Vegetation in South Algiers Steppes. Ph.D. Thesis, Aix-Marseille III University, Marseille.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aidoud, A. (1983) Contribution to the Study of Steppe Ecosystems of South Oran: Plant Biomass, Primary Productivity and Pastoral Application. Thesis, University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene, Algiers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djebaili, S. (1984) Algerian Steppe: Phytosociology and Ecology. Odessa Polytechnic National State University, Algiers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benabadji, N. (1995) Phytoecological Study of the Steppes at Artemisia herba alba Asso and Salsola vermiculata L. in South Sebdou (Oran, Algeria). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tlemcen, Tlemcen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouazza, M. (1995) Phytoecological Study of the Steppes at Stipa tenacissima L. and Lygeum spartum L. in South Sebdou (Oran, Algeria). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tlemcen, Tlemcen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henni, M. (2014) Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Vegetation and Soil in Atriplex canescens and Role of the Species in Improving Feed Provides Degraded Steppe Rangelands of the Wilaya of Saida (Western Algeria). Ph.D. Thesis, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel-Abbes, Algeria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guinochet, M. (1973) Phytosociology. Masson et Cie Edit., Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Long, G. (1974) Phytoecological Diagnostic and Planning. I. General Principles and Methods. Masson and Cie, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braun-Blanquet, J. (1951) Pflanzensoziologie. 2nd Edition, Springer, Vienne, 631 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordier, B. (1965) The Correspondence Analysis. Thesis, Université de Rennes, Rennes, 66 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Godron, M. (1984) Ecology of Terrestrial Vegetation. Masson and Cie, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trabut, C.L. (1887) D’Oran at Méchéria. Botanical Notes and Catalog Remarkable Plants. Algiers, 36 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50904-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quézel, P. and Santa, S. (1962) New Flora of Algeria and the Southern Desert Regions. CNRS, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>