<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2014.511103</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-47489</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>PHYSICS &amp; MATHEMATICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Some Possible Particles Decays from pp Collisions at LHC Experiment</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hasan</surname><given-names>Arslan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Physics Department, Bing?l University, Bing?l, Turkey</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hasanarslan46@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1023</fpage><lpage>1026</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	Some of
the possible decays of pp collisions
at LHC experiment are considered. The vector bosons mediating in the
electroweak interactions and right-handed leptons except neutrinos are assumed
to be the most resultant particles from the pp collisions. Neutrinos and anti-neutrinos will be observed when one-double
electron charged vector bosons are the resultant particles. The charge
conservation is thought to be the dominant factor of these decays. The
amplitude transitions for Feynman diagram of these decays are written. 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Z&lt;/i&gt;' Boson</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;W&lt;/i&gt;' Bosons</kwd><kwd> Resultant Particles from pp Collisions</kwd><kwd> Scattering Amplitude</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Standard Model (SM) is in difficulties with defining the problems:</p><p>1) The Higgs particle mass,</p><p>2) Including the gravitational interactions to the SM,</p><p>3) The dark matter representation in the model,</p><p>4) The masses for neutrinos,</p><p>5) Large gap energy between electroweak scale and Planck scale,</p><p>6) The unification of gauge couplings of the electroweak interactions at some energy scale if the four fundamental forces are the result of a local gauge theory with a higher fundamental symmetry.</p><p>The recent experiments mainly LHC and the future colliders will solve these problems. The electromagnetic field interactions and weak interactions are combined in a single representation by the Glashow-Weinberg-Sa- lam Model of the electroweak interactions based on the gauge group SU(2) &#215; U(1) which is in good agreement with the experimental results. Later the strong interactions are included to the theory and the group is written as SU(3)C &#215; SU(2)L &#215; U(1)Y. This group defines the SM particles. Since the four fundamental forces; weak, electromagnetic, strong, and gravity; are equal at the Grand Unified Theory (GUT) energy scale, the some of the additional neutral gauge bosons might be discovered at CERN LHC experiment as well as the lightest supersymmetric stable particle of the dark energy and the particles which have at the same time the properties of the leptons and quarks or the states changes to each other named as lepto-quarks or exotic fermions. The fermionic particles of the SM are grouped in the representation of the three generations as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1861"><label>(1)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\9f7b1439-bc11-4080-81dd-3db929b5ef3e.png"/></disp-formula><p>The first two particles of each group are the leptons with charges 0, –1 respectively in the unit of the electron charge. The last two are quarks with the electron charge +2/3 and –1/3 for u and d type quarks. Each particles described have their anti-particles. These particles all together build up the matter around us.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Some Particles Decaying from pp Collisions at LHC</title><p>The breaking of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\3f08e6ef-ade6-4009-b81b-b850ab339f95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives other gauge groups. Concentrating on the SU(2)L &#215; U(1)Y &#215; U(1) effective theory,</p><p>the<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\cef11d3e-8d0c-4cff-9d62-b43243b0ce02.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\14479303-1301-4c6a-9f70-8486c9f05402.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\5bc10b2a-31d5-4c37-8ab2-03d99b3e4ab0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the possible U(1)’s in broken E6 GUT’s and the extra U(1) is an Abelian</p><p>symmetry with its associated “hypercharge” Y [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref1">1</xref>] ;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1862"><label>(2)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\7928a09c-f08b-4009-9f91-52ae464eddfe.png"/></disp-formula><p>The symmetry will be spontaneously broken by a Higgs sector consisting of one doublet and one singlet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The decays <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\07b1a0d0-278c-4f03-828a-f95e334bff75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> have the same validity as the decays given by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\83e8161b-dd3d-4bb4-bcc3-9ae95d9a34cb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\c16304dd-95df-4c96-897e-9351ab3ffc7e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> refers</p><p>to anti-leptons except right-handed neutrinos. This is true because in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref3">3</xref>] the mass of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\1658e30a-ed50-4aff-9f62-170f8994e8c6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is estimated by calculating the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\36b775d0-6028-42f6-8202-657a824b03c6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> decay width as the same procedure of calculating the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\a931c579-fbd8-4d13-9e30-ca4f933b8a0a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> boson decay width. Using the relation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref4">4</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1863"><label>(3)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\12e5acca-cbc5-4852-bf27-17be6115e4b1.png"/></disp-formula><p>given for the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\1ba893c9-ecef-4b63-b518-62caf42a55fa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\d30c814f-0ae6-495c-aea8-5e31ccedb604.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, there is no doubt in writing the relation as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1864"><label>. (4)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\50d4e58b-e628-49f5-9acd-23a9de056c6b.png"/></disp-formula><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref3">3</xref>] <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\d4082ed6-affd-4d8c-8347-82a8faff35a9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>mass is estimated around 630 GeV and the Weinberg angle is taken as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1865"><label>(5)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\c589ec26-bdb7-4bd6-aa32-9a8943dd608b.png"/></disp-formula><p>at GUT scale. Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1866"><label>. (6)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\e64e2d17-89f1-4123-a8bb-ea6990addb50.png"/></disp-formula><p>Using the conservation of the protons’ charges, some of the possible pp collisions decays will be such that (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>When it is assumed that the anti-leptons are the resultant particles as the vector bosons then the right-handed neutrinos couldn’t be seen as the resultant particles. In these decays instead of the intermediate vector bosons the neutral and plus-charged Higgs bosons could take the place. The Higgs bosons would be the plus ones replaced in the resultant particles such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\1180cc1c-75ec-420f-8c06-7c0aa34bdbce.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The neutral Higgs boson could be the one replaced in neutral mediating vector bosons<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\e38ac022-29bc-4f62-9c7d-eb1184e45e11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The scattering amplitude for the diagrams in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> can be written down by using the amplitude evaluated for the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\4b20b3ae-60ff-449d-98b2-3f7879adb3af.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> scattering in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.47489-ref5">5</xref>] as</p><fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p> The diagram for the decay<img src="htmlimages\3-7501670x\50275834-bb86-4af3-93da-8792a972282b.png" width="140" height="37.5" /></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\2b721949-107f-4bee-8ac1-d03b41864a4a.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p> The diagram for the decay<img src="htmlimages\3-7501670x\fd5a8aa3-4961-4c05-b320-f25353401714.png" width="145" height="37.5" /></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\de89bfda-7f5c-403a-8ff3-a18231ce126d.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1867"><label>(7)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\217700b4-e0e8-4d36-83ab-a65ac14cc0be.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1868"><label>(8)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\7a070149-108e-47fb-be81-a64bc2601cc7.png"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1869"><label>(9)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\eed7d346-27fd-44f6-8be1-a006bd951f8a.png"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\fa10aca7-5003-4b1c-9eba-af6bc7f554a4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the four momentum of the resultant particles. The 4-curent for proton is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1870"><label>. (10)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\f1c9f2c5-7db3-4fc3-8623-c57a355a5673.png"/></disp-formula><p>Since the protons have the same 4-momentum it is true to write down:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1871"><label>(11)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\f3a30a52-9f87-43ea-a651-6f5a1bbea3cf.png"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the exponential term not written in Eqn. (10) is 1. The scattering amplitude can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.47489-formula1872"><label>(12)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\3ae2de46-2477-4f7e-8f4d-a06981b25849.png"/></disp-formula><p>Again the waves for both of two protons must be the same, so <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\60c78f3a-0def-435a-b195-2366c85af42b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is taken in Equation (12). In</p><p>Equation (12) the<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\68418cad-66f5-44db-ab44-7c7173e983e6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\47f42719-562c-43f5-94cc-175bddbd1c89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\288e3997-9b43-4938-9a2e-9170632a1b11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the normalization factors; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\ba22a16b-a747-490d-bdd3-80afdff490c8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the propagator for the mediating</p><p>bosons; q refers to the momentum differences between the final and the initial states, and the four-momenta</p><p>conservation is given by the term <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\3-7501670x\274d7dbc-9216-4a29-a6a5-e813f5f9f134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for incoming and outgoing particles.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusion</title><p>Although the SM has some difficulties, it is strongly a correct model to extend at the GUT scale. By using the previous works the W' gauge boson mass is estimated to be around 498 GeV. The resultant particles from pp collisions are assumed to be a double positive-electron charged vector boson with a neutrino or anti-neutrino, or, two vector bosons each with one positive-electron charge, instead of the latter one; two anti-leptons are also accepted except the neutrinos. The pp collisions at GUT scale will give the scattering amplitudes as done in this work.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I would like to thank to Prof. Dr. Durmuş Ali Demir for his opinions in studying this subject.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.47489-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIB, C. AND GILMAN, J.F. (1987) PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 36, 1337-1343. HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVD.36.1337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.47489-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ARSLAN, H. (2008) EXTRA GAUGE BOSONS IN E6 MODELS, PH.D. THESIS, CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY, ADANA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.47489-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AYDEMIR, A., ARSLAN, H. AND TOPAKSU, A.K. (2009) PHYSICS OF PARTICLES AND NUCLEI LETTERS, 6, 496-503. HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1134/S1547477109040049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.47489-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AITCHISON, I.J.R. AND HEY, A.J.G. (1982) GAUGE THEORIES IN PARTICLE PHYSICS. ADAM HILGER, LONDON.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.47489-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GREINER, W., SCHRAMM, S. AND STEIN, E. (2002) QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS. SPRINGER-VERLAG, BERLIN, HEIDELBERG.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>