<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2014.58070</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-46359</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>PHYSICS &amp; MATHEMATICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Numerical Calculations of Some Plasma Parameters of the Capacitively Coupled RF Discharge</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Ali Hassouba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>Rida Galaly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Usama</surname><given-names>Mohamed Rashed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, KSA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Engineering Science Dept, Faculty of Community, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, KSA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Alazhar University, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ahmed_galaly@yahoo.com(ARG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>05</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>591</fpage><lpage>598</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	Numerical
calculations by using a self-consistent model of the collisional sheath for the
capacitively coupled RF discharge are
our target. The results indicated that, at high pressure, the ohmic heating is
usually the dominant heating mechanism in the discharge. The power dissipated
in the sheath is calculated and compared with the measured data. Moreover, we
indicated that, when the gas pressure is increased, the calculated dissipated
power is decreased also while the measured input RF power is increased. Furthermore the sheath thickness of the
capacitively coupled discharge is calculated and in the same order of the
electron oscillation amplitude in the RF field, while the ionization mean free path is shorter than it. 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;RF&lt;/i&gt;-Discharge</kwd><kwd> Self-Consistent Model</kwd><kwd> Ohmic Heating</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Capacitively coupled RF discharges were widely used in the microelectronics industry for the production of in- tegrated circuits specially processes such as etching and coating [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref5">5</xref>] . In these systems, the metallic electrodes were normally enclosed within the reactor and in direct contact with the plasma. External conditions, like pres- sure, power, geometry and driving frequency determine the properties of the plasma and thus its practical use in various applications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>When RF voltage is applied between two parallel plate electrodes, two sheaths are formed in front of each electrode and plasma connecting these sheaths. These sheaths heat the electrons through a process in which electrons reflected from the moving sheath edge and gained energy on average. This process usually referred to Stochastic heating which is the dominant source of electron heating at low pressure besides the well-known oh- mic heating. Heating by RF radiation was very important in the fusion device [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref7">7</xref>] . Two kinds of electron heating mechanisms may be taken place. Firstly, ohmic heating due to the transfer of energy gained from the accelera- tion of electrons in electric field to thermal electron energy through collisional processes. Secondly, Stochastic electron heating has been found to be a powerful mechanism in capacitive coupling R-F discharge. Here elec- trons impinging on the oscillating sheath edge suffer a change of velocity upon reflection back into the bulk plasma. As the sheath moves into the bulk, the reflected ions gain energy, as the sheath moves away, the electron loss energy. However, averaging over an oscillation period, there is a net energy gain.</p><p>At sufficiently large RF voltage, the beams of fast electrons ensure the high rate of ionization in the quasi- neutral plasma. This ionization, as well as the diffusion of charged particles near the boundaries of the sheaths compensates the losses of electrons and ions in the central part of the discharge due to recombination and diffu- sion. The discharge becomes stable and continues to burn in the strong-current regime, and low-frequency oscil- lations disappear [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The aim of the present work is using a self-consistent analysis of the collisional sheath of the capacitively coupled RF discharge to calculate the electron ohmic heating power, the average Stochastic power for a single sheath, the power dissipated in the sheath and the sheath thickness and compared the results with the available experimental data.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Setup</title><p>The capacitive discharge plasma was formed between two stainless-steel 20 cm diameter electrodes separated by 6 cm. The lower electrode was powered by RF (13.56 MHz), type ENI model OEM-6, generator through a matching box, while the upper electrode as well as the discharge chamber was grounded. The chamber was pumped down by a vacuum system to base pressure of 10<sup>−4</sup> torr. During all measurements, continues flow of a gas through the discharge chamber was maintained. High purity Ar gas was used as the working gas and was fed to the chamber through a needle valve. The pressure of the working gas was varied between 1 - 10 torr and measured using a digital vacuum gauge (VAP 5). For displaying the waveform of the discharge current and vol- tage two channel digital oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 320, 100 MHz) was used. The applied voltage “V” was measured by using HF voltmeter type B7-37, while the discharge current “I” was measured from its waveform with the help of an oscilloscope. Bird Model 4431-43 Series wattmeter was used to measure the input and/or dissipated powers.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows a schematic drawing of the apparatus used in this work. Also, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows an example of the waveform of RF discharge at discharge voltage = 950 V and at Ar gas pressure = 1 torr.</p><fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p> It shows a schematic drawing of the experimental setup</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\c01165f9-6c51-45df-9ee3-85f7f8fdb03a.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p> It shows an example of the waveform of RF discharge at discharge voltage = 950 V and at Ar gas pressure = 1 torr</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\090e410e-51bc-45ae-9238-ee6422888940.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Theoretical Considerations</title><p>At high pressure a self-consistent analysis of the collisional sheath is required, which has been given by Lieber- mann [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref9">9</xref>] and Godyak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref10">10</xref>] . These authors assuming that, the ion mean free path λ<sub>i</sub> is constant independent of the velocity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref11">11</xref>] . Also, assuming the ionization occurs in the sheath, and the electrons are accelerated into the plasma.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Self-Consistent Model</title><p>The self-consistent model equations are summarized below. Assuming that the plasma length d &#187; l − 2S<sub>m</sub> (where S<sub>m</sub> is the maximum sheath thickness) l is the system length, with an initial estimate S<sub>m</sub> &#187; 1 cm for numerical computations which is a nominal value for high-pressure capacitive RF discharge. From particle conservations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref12">12</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1334"><label>(1)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\ed7d6557-c558-46ba-a6c5-7a7e345411c5.png"/></disp-formula><p>(where K<sub>iz</sub> is the rate constant for electron-neutral ionization, U<sub>B</sub> is the Bohm velocity, n<sub>g</sub> is the neutral atom density and d<sub>eff</sub> is an effective plasma size).</p><p>At intermediate and low pressure, we have:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1335"><label>(2)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\dd51fff1-0151-43d3-a97c-379997110bfa.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1336"><label>(3)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\d487f551-2f28-43ac-a055-228bffd261d5.png"/></disp-formula><p>(n<sub>s</sub> is the ion density at the plasma sheath edge, n<sub>0</sub> is the plasma density). Where u<sub>s</sub> = u<sub>B</sub> for collisionless sheath and where at higher pressure one has:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1337"><label>(4)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\567240a1-0350-461e-bebe-bf1091eecf60.png"/></disp-formula><p>where K<sub>mi</sub> is the ion-neutral momentum transfer rate constant.</p><p>And the (n<sub>s</sub>/n<sub>0</sub>) ratio becomes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1338"><label>(5)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\daa2afbb-9436-4724-ab19-16afaf5f6832.png"/></disp-formula><p>where D<sub>a</sub> is the ambipolar diffusion coefficient. The electron ohmic heating power per unit area is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1339"><label>(6)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\73f7dcae-7da0-4cc0-8751-a9c95cda09dd.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1340"><label>(7)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\b49b7de9-b058-4d6e-9bc0-a41a4e18b415.png"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\4785dd1b-b5a4-48d4-a7d7-6631f155ad80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the fundamental RF voltage amplitude across a single sheath, u<sub>m</sub> is the electron neutral frequency and b is a constant equal to (p/l).</p><p>Also, the average Stochastic power for a single sheath is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1341"><label>(8)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\119c0d68-e739-4715-a575-fc1a267eddd7.png"/></disp-formula><p>The ion kinetic energy per ion hitting the electrode is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1342"><label>(9)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\e1d9fad5-92ae-4fac-b720-25b63a9654b5.png"/></disp-formula><p>The electron power balance equation is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1343"><label>(10)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\b0d5b8ca-f80c-4dce-8ec2-2e37d08cc46d.png"/></disp-formula><p>So, the total power absorbed per unit area is then found as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1344"><label>(11)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\8138cb35-1c8e-4583-8d6e-a12ef806f7a5.png"/></disp-formula><p>Eliminating n<sub>s</sub> from Equations (10), (11) and using Equation (9) for V, one can obtain the final equation as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1345"><label>(12)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\62bb016a-391a-4b4b-aeac-31e0b1d6e1c1.png"/></disp-formula><p>Take the following parameters:</p><p>p = 1 torr (Ar gas used), l = 10 cm,</p><p>f = 13.56 MHz → ω = 8.6 &#180; 10<sup>7</sup> Hz, V<sub>RF</sub> = 930 V, T<sub>e</sub> = 8 eV,</p><p>n<sub>g</sub> = 3.55 &#180; 10<sup>22</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>, k<sub>iz</sub> = 7 &#180; 10<sup>−15</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/sec,</p><p>k<sub>ni</sub> = 1.4 &#180; 10<sup>−14</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/sec and k<sub>el</sub> = 1.6 &#180; 10<sup>−13</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/sec,</p><p>Starting with S<sub>m</sub> = 1 cm, λ<sub>i</sub> = 3 &#180; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm, d = l − 2S<sub>m</sub> = 8 cm.</p><p>\<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\33aaa055-796a-4442-8892-ceaf90fb00dc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is in the high pressure region, in which the plasma is relatively curved in the center. Also, the RF electric field rises at the plates and falls at the mid plane.</p><p>Substituting into Equations (8), (9) we get:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1346"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\a3591f0d-7b11-4d9a-926c-ac79f82399e3.png"/></disp-formula><p>This result indicates that, at high pressure, the ohmic heating is usually the dominant heating mechanism.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Power Dissipation in the Sheath</title><p>The power P<sub>s</sub> dissipated in the sheath is given by the product of the time averaged sheath voltage V<sub>p</sub> and the ion current I<sub>R</sub>.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1347"><label>(13)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\35fcdcf2-95e4-4682-bcc3-5eeba07bf3b5.png"/></disp-formula><p>After expressing V<sub>p</sub> by the Child-Langmuir law:</p><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1348"><label>(14)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\55aac612-a1db-4aa0-9278-e22adccfc48f.png"/></disp-formula><p>p is the gas pressure in torr, A is the electrode area, k is the ion mobility constant for the used gas and d<sub>S</sub> is the sheath thickness given by the following equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1349"><label>(15)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\77e386d1-032b-45a6-bbc5-2ceba39f6965.png"/></disp-formula><p>where X<sub>p</sub> is capacitive reactance of the sheath which given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1350"><label>(16)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\cbdccbcf-37ee-4ce5-8c9b-469f076f43ac.png"/></disp-formula><p>where I is discharge current.</p><p>After rearrangement the equations one yields;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1351"><label>(17)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\9698d4c0-1504-4f43-8c36-ae795b9b42a8.png"/></disp-formula><p>After solving for P<sub>S</sub>, one can obtain the final expression for the power dissipated in the sheath as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1352"><label>(18)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\a978fd50-af81-4f78-b036-cbb6957be182.png"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Sheath Thickness</title><p>The sheath thickness d<sub>s</sub> is defined by the capacitor formula C<sub>s</sub> = e<sub>0</sub>A/d<sub>s</sub>, where C<sub>s</sub> is the sheath capacitance.</p><p>Relating C<sub>s</sub> to X from the relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1353"><label>(19)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\28ad2fc2-b565-4426-b8c3-60a45d03bbd3.png"/></disp-formula><p>\ <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\696dec93-fef1-43a2-a13a-ed55931d9b08.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (20)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.46359-formula1354"><label>(21)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\76f779e0-cb26-4fbe-aad5-0a54fc235555.png"/></disp-formula><p>where V<sub>RF</sub> is the RF voltage across the tube and I is the discharge current.</p><p>At V<sub>RF</sub> = 930 V, I = 20 mA and A = 3 &#180; 10<sup>−2</sup> m<sup>−2</sup>, then d<sub>s</sub> is of the order of 0.01 m.</p><p>According to the description given by Allen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref14">14</xref>] the sheath thickness d<sub>s</sub> of a capacitively coupled RF discharge should be of the same order of the electron oscillation amplitude X<sub>m</sub> in the RF field of the discharge.</p><p>\<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\8ba23c41-459e-4ecf-84d9-9697bd05cde0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Those authors give the plausible argument that the maximum distance the electrons can be displaced during a half cycle is equal to the sheath thickness; otherwise they would be captured by the electrodes.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>The relation between the applied voltage “V” and the discharge current “I” of the RF discharge is measured. The measurements have been carried out in the pressure range (0.5 - 2 torr) for Ar gas. I-V characteristic curves for Ar gas at pressures of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 torr are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>The relation between the applied voltage and the discharge current can be explained as the following:</p><p>When the applied voltage increased the amplitude of the RF electric field is increased, so, the oscillating electrons gain enough energy to make collisions with the neutral particles and increasing the ionization rate, consequently the discharge current would increase. At high pressure, the number of electrons-atom ionizing collision increases, thus, more electrons are produced and consequently, the discharge current is increased. Moreover, the voltage across the plasma sheath cannot be specified independently of the heating mechanism and the power absorbed by the plasma.</p><p>On the other hand, the self-consistent model is used for high pressure capacitive RF discharge. Assuming the following: 1) The only loss mechanism is electron loss to the wall; 2) The ionization occurs in the sheath, and the electrons are accelerated into the plasma; 3) The plasma length d &#187; l − 2S<sub>m</sub> (where S<sub>m</sub> is the maximum sheath thickness) l is the system length, with an initial estimate S<sub>m</sub> &#187; 1 cm for numerical computations which is a no-</p><fig id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p> The I-V characteristic curves for Ar gas at different pressures</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\694b2054-8484-45a7-9367-155f8d3c6f98.png"/></fig><p>minal value for high-pressure capacitive RF discharge.</p><p>The electron ohmic heating power per unit area and the average Stochastic power for a single sheath are cal- culated using Equations (7) and (8) respectively. The calculation results indicate that, at high pressure, the ohmic heating is usually the dominant heating mechanism. Ohmic heating due to the transfer of energy gained from the acceleration of electrons in electric field to thermal electron energy through collisional processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>The power dissipated in the sheath P<sub>s</sub> is calculated using Equation (18), (where the constant k for Ar gas is equal to 103.75 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref13">13</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the comparison between the measured dissipated power P<sub>s</sub>, measured using the wattmeter, and the calculated one as a function of Ar gas pressure at constant discharge current I = 20 mA. When the gas pressure increased the dissipated power is decreased. At high gas pressure, the secondary electrons traversing the near-electrode sheath have an opportunity to experience one or several elastic and/or inelastic collisions that results in lesser energy acquired by them over the sheath width compared with the case without collisions.</p><p>Moreover, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the relation between the input power of the discharge, which calculated from the measured waveform of the discharge currents, at two constant discharge voltage, as a function of the gas pres- sure. When the gas pressure increases the gas discharge is more confined in the electrode space due to the lower mean free path associated with a large number of collisions. It’s clear, however, that one can vary the power consumed by the discharge not only by varying the discharge voltage V but also by varying the chamber pres- sure at a constant V.</p><p>In contrast to the measurements presented, the total power measured by the wattmeter, before the matching network, shows the small variations of the order of &#177;10% when increasing the gas pressure, while the power re- ally consumed in the discharge changes more than that for higher applied voltage. The reason for that is, most of the power output of the power supply is consumed in the matching network and the stray impedance of the sys- tem. Thus a relation between the actual dissipated power P<sub>s</sub> in the discharge to the total power P<sub>T</sub> measured by the wattmeter which include, the power consumed in the discharge and the power losses in the matching net- work, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The actual power is a small non constant fraction of the total power and the amount of power consumed in the discharge is higher at higher applied voltages and gas pressures. This is due to the fact that plasma impedance is changing and thus a large amount of power is transferred from the power supply to the discharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Moreover, the sheath thickness d<sub>s</sub> of a capacitively coupled RF discharge is calculated using Equation (19), d<sub>s</sub> should be of the same order of the electron oscillation amplitude X<sub>m</sub> in the RF field of the discharge. The higher sheath field will increase the amount of power consumed for the acceleration of ions and secondary electrons in the sheath. In the case of higher pressures, the smaller mean free path of the electrons leads to smaller sheath dimensions and thus to higher sheath capacitance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46359-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p> It shows the comparison between the measured dissipated power P<sub>s</sub>, measured using the wattmeter, and the calculated one as a function of Ar gas pressure at constant discharge current I = 20 mA</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\b722d406-aec0-435e-b83f-96e44a31b7f9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p> It shows the relation between the input power of the discharge, which calculated from the measured waveform of the discharge currents, at two constant discharge voltage, as a function of the gas pressure</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\a4a1de17-2d79-404b-8eaf-1d6090c8b6e4.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>A self-consistent model of the collisional sheath of the capacitively coupled RF discharge at high gas pressure is used. The electron ohmic heating power, the average Stochastic power for a single sheath, the power dissipated in the sheath and the sheath thickness are calculated.</p><p>The plasma is produced, using 13.65 MHz RF source, using Ar gas. The relation between the applied voltage “V” and the discharge current “I” of the RF discharge is measured. The voltage across the plasma sheath cannot be specified independently of the heating mechanism and the power absorbed by the plasma. The calculation results indicate that, at high pressure, the ohmic heating is usually the dominant heating mechanism. The electrons are heated by ohmic heating resulting from the volume currents, rather than from sheath heating.</p><p>At constant discharge current I = 20 mA, the calculated and/or measured dissipated power in the sheath is de- creased when the gas pressure is increased.</p><p>The relation between the actual dissipated power P<sub>s</sub> in the discharge to the total power P<sub>T</sub> measured by the wattmeter which include, the power consumed in the discharge and the power losses in the matching network, is</p><fig id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p> The relation between the ratio (P<sub>s</sub>/P<sub>T</sub>) as a function of the discharge voltage V of the discharge voltage V at different gas pressure</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-7501741x\92a6223e-712b-435e-8001-783c37ab179d.png"/></fig><p>given. The actual power is a small non-constant fraction of the total power and the amount of power consumed in the discharge is higher at higher applied voltages and gas pressures. The power coupling to the discharge is sensitive to the variation of both the discharge voltage and gas pressure.</p><p>Moreover, the sheath thickness d<sub>s</sub> of a capacitively coupled RF discharge is calculated and found to be of the same order of the electron oscillation amplitude X<sub>m</sub> in the RF field of the discharge.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.46359-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>GALALY</surname><given-names> A.R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> EL AKSHAR</surname><given-names> F.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2013)<article-title>GALALY, A.R. AND EL AKSHAR, F.F</article-title><source>.  INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING (IJMRAE)</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 169</fpage>-<lpage>179</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GALALY, A.R., ELAKSHAR, F.F. AND KHEDR, M.A. (2013) MATERIALS SCIENCE FORUM, 756, 143-150.
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/MSF.756.143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GALALY, A.R. AND ELAKSHAR, F.F. (2013) JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS, 4, 215-225.
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.4236/JMP.2013.42030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">HASSOUBA, M.A., NOSSAIR, A.M. AND EL-AKASHAR, F.F. (2001) JURNAL FIZIK MALAYSIA, 22, 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LISOVSKIY, V.A. AND YEGORENKOV, V.D. (2004) VACUUM, 74, 19-28.
HTTP://WWW.SCIENCEDIRECT.COM/SCIENCE/JOURNAL/0042207X/74/1 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.VACUUM.2003.11.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CHEN, F.F. (2006) PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 15, 773. 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1088/0963-0252/15/4/022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CHEN, F.F. (2009) PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 18, ARTICLE ID: 035012.
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1088/0963-0252/18/3/035012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AMANATIDES, E. AND MATARAS, D. (2001) JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 89, 1556. 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1063/1.1337597</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DUDNIKOV, V. AND DUDNIKOV, A. (2012) REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 83, ARTICLE ID: 02A720.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GODYAK, V.A., PIEJAK, R.B. AND ALEXANDROVICH, B.M. (1991) IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 19, 134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LIEBERMANN, M.A. (1989) JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 65, 4168. 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1063/1.343298</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GODYAK, V.A. (1990) IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 18 159-168. 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1109/27.45519</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LIEBERMANN, M.A. AND LICHTENBERG, A.J. (1994) PRINCIPLES OF PLASMA DISCHARGES AND MATERIALS PROCESSES. JOHN WILEY &amp; SONS INC., NEW YORK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ALLEN, J.A., BOYD, R.L. AND REYNOLDS, P. (1957) PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY B, 70, 297.
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1088/0370-1301/70/3/303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SURENDRA, M. AND GRAVES, D.B. (1990) APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 56, 1022. 
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1063/1.102604</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46359-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SPILIOPOULOS, N., MATARAS, D. AND RAPAKOULIAS, D.E. (1996) JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE &amp; TECHNOLOGY A, 14, 2757.
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1116/1.580197</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>