<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2014.25041</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-48500</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>CHEMISTRY &amp; MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><subject>ENGINEERING</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Potentials of Bambusa vulgaris Grown in Southeast Nigeria for the Manufacture of Wood-Cement Composite Panels</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eugene</surname><given-names>O. Onuorah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elias</surname><given-names>Chukwunonso Nnabuife</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>T. Nwabanne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Forestry and Wildlife, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>joe_nwabanne@yahoo.com(JTN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>363</fpage><lpage>373</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>In this work, the potentials of Bambusa vulgaris grown in southeast Nigeria for the manufacture of wood-cement composite panels were studied. Representative culms of Bambusa vulgaris were collected from a 4-year-old stand at lower Anambra river basin, southeast, Nigeria. Fiber morphological properties and proximate chemical analysis were determined in accordance with the provisions of the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industries (TAPPI, 1998). Fiber slenderness ratio was 160.95:1, component solubility of 3.09, 5.60, and 19.8 percent for cold water soak for 24 hrs; hot water soak at 80°C for 1 hr, and 1% NaOH soak for 24 hrs respectively. Composite panels were made at 1200 kg/m<sup>3</sup> and 800 kg/m<sup>3</sup> density levels with flakes of different soak treatments (untreated/control; cold water soak for 24 hrs; water at 80°C soak for 1 hr and 1% NaOH soak for 24 hrs) at variable cement/B. vulgaris mix ratios (1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1, 2.5:1 and 3:1 wt/wt) with 3% CaCl<sub>2</sub> as accelerator applied to the wood furnish before cement mixing. Prepared furnish was subjected to initial pre-pressing of 0.5 N/mm<sup>2</sup> and final consolidation of 1.4 N/mm<sup>2</sup> retained for 24 hrs. Panels were sampled and tested after 28 days for Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) in bending and for water absorption (WA) and thickness swelling (TS) due to a 24-hr water soak. Test was in accordance with provisions of American Standard for Testing of Materials (ASTM-1998). Properties ranged from a low of 25.00 to 75.45 N/mm2 for MOR; 4128 to 15,065 N/mm2 for MOE; 15.01 to 36.11 percent for WA and 3.04 to 12.72 percent for TA. Effect of production mix on properties was determined using factorial analysis. Except for composite density whose effect was not significant at 0.05% level, all production mix was found significant at 0.01% level at the second order level of interactions. All panels met minimum property requirements of American National Standard Institute 208-2-1994 and 208-1-1993, British Standard (BS 5669, 1979) and Malaysian Standard (MS 934, 1984).</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fiber Characteristics</kwd><kwd> Proximate Analysis</kwd><kwd> Soak Treatments</kwd><kwd> Panel Density</kwd><kwd> Cement/B. vulgaris Mix Ratios</kwd><kwd> Composite Properties</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Concerns for global environmental degradation as a result of deforestation and use of fossil fuels as well as reported pockets of deficit in supply of forest timber based industrial fiber in some parts of the world have created a need for the search for alternative products that are both sustainable and environmentally friendly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref5">5</xref>] . Wood/lignocellulosic based composites have been found to be particularly attractive primarily because of their high potential for value addition, sustainable supply, low cost, non carcinogenic and high specific strength properties relative to other competing materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref6">6</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] . Again wood-cement composites have the added advantage of resistance to corrosion, biodegradation, fire and flame spread. As a product, they exhibit also high levels of thermal and sound insulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>In general, properties of wood/lignocellulosic composite panels are known to have high correlations with the characteristics of the constituent raw materials, their distribution within the matrix and interactions of the relevant production variables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref10">10</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref14">14</xref>] . Industrial utilization of bamboo, agricultural lignocellulosics and wood-re- sidues has been reported to have the high multiplier effect on the economy because it is sustainable, and environmentally friendly, has the high wealth generation potential and creates employment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Available records indicate that there are over 1200 species of bamboo found in 70 genera [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref16">16</xref>] . Bambusa vulgaris belongs to the bambusoidae sub-family of the Graminaceae family and it is a perennial woody plant that matures in 3 to 6 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref16">16</xref>] . Bambooes are reported to be the fastest growing plant on earth sometimes producing three times more biomass than the fastest growing tree [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref16">16</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref18">18</xref>] . One of the known draw backs that had delayed private sector investment in industrial timber plantation in developing economies is the long gestation period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref5">5</xref>] . Since bamboo is a short rotation crop relative to trees, it can be integrated into agroforestry and environmental forestry in order to supply industrial fiber. It is thus imperative that efficient and cost effective industrial use of bamboo biomass must be found.</p><p>Presently the use of bamboo in the production of industrial products in Nigeria and indeed sub-saharan Africa is in its infancy. There are obstacles in the production and utilization of wood cement composites. One of such obstacles is the adverse effects of some wood constituents, notably extractives and soluble polysaccharides on the hydration and curing of cement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref19">19</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref21">21</xref>] . Some of the process methods which had been used to ameliorate the adverse effects of wood constituents and extractives on the setting of cement were the use of various leaching/soaking regimes and incorporation of additives that will accelerate hydration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref20">20</xref>] . Other impediments had been the increasing cost of the composite as the cement-wood ratio was increased as the cement costs more than the lignocellulosic furnish. Also, it is often necessary to balance the improvements in physical and mechanical properties as composite panel density is increased with the limitations of denser panels as weight of the composite can become a limiting factor in certain constructions.</p><p>The objective of this study were to evaluate the effects of cement/Bumbusa vulgaris mix ratios, chip/flake soak treatments and composite panel densities on the Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) in Bending; and the water absorption and thickness swelling properties of the resultant composite panel.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Material Collection and Preparation</title><p>Representative culms of Bambusa vulgaris were obtained from a four year old bamboo stand at Nteje (6˚16&quot;N latitude and 6˚40&quot;E longitude) in Oyi Local Government Area, Anambra State, southeast, Nigeria. The culms were collected at 10, 20, 50, 70 and 90 percent of the full length for each stick of bamboo. Identification was done using floral parts after the method reported by some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref23">23</xref>] . The collected culms were allowed to dry in the open laboratory for 30 days at the end of which each culm was manually broken into 100 mm by 150 mm by wall thickness. The resultant discs were further reduced to flakes of average 50 mm by 16 mm by 1.9 mm in a pallmann knife ring flaker. The flakes were further allowed to dry in the open laboratory for two weeks at laboratory conditions. At the end of this period, the flakes were collected and stored in vapour impermeable bags and kept for use. Cement used was ordinary Portland cement sold in 50 kg bags and commonly available in Nigerian market.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Soak Treatment</title><p>Representative samples of the flakes were either marked and used untreated, to be used after soaking in distilled water for 24 hrs at room conditions; soaked in distilled water at a temperature of 80˚C or soaked in one percent Sodium Hydroxide solution (NaOH) for 24 hrs at room conditions. At the end of each soak treatment, the leachants were allowed to drain off and the flakes washed immediately with copious supply of distilled water. The soaked and unsoaked particles were conditioned in a conditioning chamber at 20˚C &#177; 2˚C and 65% &#177; 1% Relative humidity (R. H.) and stored in vapour impermeable bags ready for use.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Chemical Analysis</title><p>Proximate chemical analysis was conducted in compliance with the provisions of the standard Test Methods of the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref24">24</xref>] . Representative flakes randomly selected were Wiley milled to powder, screened through a 60 BSS mesh and powder that passed through 60 BSS mesh but retained on 80 were used for the analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Fiber/Culm Anatomical and Physical Characteristics</title><p>Representative flakes were selected and reduced to splinters. The splinters were macerated/pulped in 1% NaOH conc. at 80˚C for 10 hrs. At the end of the above period, the resultant fiber bundles were washed in distilled water and the fiber suspension subsequently subjected to further defiberization in the presence of glass beads with the aid of vigorous agitation (Onuorah, 2005). One hundred and thirty (130) representative fiber samples were selected, stained with safarin-C and mounted on slides and viewed at 100&#215; magnifications using a microscope. The fiber dimensions (length, diameter, lumen width and cell wall thickness) were measured wet with the aid of stage and occular micrometer scales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref25">25</xref>] . The averages and standard deviations were determined.</p><p>Thirty representative culms were taken and the culm lengths, culm diameter and culm wall thickness measured using linear tapes and micro gauge. The specific gravity was determined in accordance with the provisions of ASTM D2395-89 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref26">26</xref>] . The means and standard deviations were determined and recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Board Making</title><p>Appropriate quantity (oven dry weight basis) of the B. vulgaris flakes for each soak treatment type was measured out based on cement-bamboo flakes mix ratio. The exact quantity to be used for each board type was determined in preliminary studies which took into cognizance the soak treatment type/mix ratio/composite density combinations. The required quantity of water in litres (Q) needed for the production of each board was determined using Equation (1)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48500-formula4075"><label>(1)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-2710229x\ff47b85a-d60f-49be-b4fd-0106d72c5092.png"/></disp-formula><p>where C = cement wt in kg; M = fiber/flake moisture content and W = oven dry wt of fiber/flakes as reported by Erakhrumen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref7">7</xref>] . Production variables used were as in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The production constants were as follows: (all pressing was done cold i.e. absence of external heat)</p><p>1) Prepressing pressure of 0.5 N/mm<sup>2</sup> before final consolidation.</p><p>2) Final press pressure of 1.4 N/mm<sup>2</sup> for 24 hrs.</p><p>3) Curing of the pressed composite took place inside a vapour impermeable bag over a 28-day period.</p><p>4) Use of 6 mm thick metal stops placed on opposite sides of the metal caul/formed furnish.</p><p>5) Addition of 3% of calcium chloride (wt/wt cement basis) to weighed flakes before addition of cement.</p><p>6) Use of 19 mm plywood covered with thin polythene as the top platen.</p><p>Mixed furnish for each composite panel was formed on top of a metal cual whose surfaces had been previously covered with a thin polythene sheet while the top of the formed furnish was covered with 19 mm plywood whose surface had been covered with same polythene. Opposite each side of the length of the caul carry-</p><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Design of variable production mix used in the manufacture of cement—Bambusa vulgaris composite panels</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Density kg/m<sup>3</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Soak treatment<sup>a</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Cement—B. vulgaris flake mix ratio<sup>k</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2:5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3:1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >No of boards produced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>k</sup>Two composite panels were made per production mix from which two test specimens per panel were sampled for testing. Control = unsoaked flakes; cold water = unheated distilled water used for soaking the flakes for 24 hrs at room conditions; hot water = flakes soaked in hot water at 80˚C for one hour; 1% NaOH = flakes soaked in 1% concentration of NaOH for 24 hrs at room conditions; <sup>a</sup>Except for the control all soak treatments were immediately followed by rapid but instantaneous washing in water in order to remove leachants and/or unspent chemicals.</p><p>ing the furnish but besides the furnish was placed a 6 mm metal stop. At the end of the curing period the panels were trimmed 0.5 mm from the edges in order to remove areas that were not properly consolidated during pressing.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Board Testing</title><p>The composite panels were sampled and tested in accordance with the provisions of ASTM D1037-96 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref26">26</xref>] . The location of each test specimen in each composite panel was determined with the aid of a table of random numbers. All test specimens were conditioned in a controlled chamber at 20˚C &#177; 2˚C and 65% &#177; 1%. Relative humidity (R.H.) was for two weeks before testing.</p><p>Properties tested were the Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) in Bending; the water absorption (WA) and thickness swelling (TS) due to a 24 hours horizontal water soak. There were a total of 4Nos tests for each production mix thus making a total of 160 Nos tests for each property. The reported properly value represents weighted average of four test samples at each production mix (mix ratio/soak/density interaction).</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title><p>A complete randomized experiment was designed at which the effects of the variable production mix (5 Nos mix-ratios, 4 Nos soak types and 2 Nos composite densities) and all possible interactions were determined. The levels of significant effects of the main variables, their first order interaction and second order interaction were determined using factorial analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref27">27</xref>] . The mean property values at appropriate production mix were also determined.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Bambusa vulgaris Properties</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents the fiber morphological characteristics, the culm features and physical characteristics of the mature B. vulgaris grown in Nteje, lower Anambra river basin, southeast, Nigeria along side of similar features for bambooes globally, sugarcane bagasse, decidous hardwoods and coconut coir fiber globally as reported in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref29">29</xref>] . These are the competing woody and non-woody fiber sources for composites. The fiber</p><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Fiber characteristics and proximate chemical analysis of B. vulgaris (bamboo) grown in Anambra river basin, southeast, Nigeria as compares with other non wood and wood-based fiber sources used in composite industry</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Property</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B. vulgaris  used in the study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bambooes  globally</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sugar cane  bagasse</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Deciduous hardwoods</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coconut  coir</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber dimensions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >i.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber length (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.91 (0.072)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.360 - 4.030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber dimeter (μm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.08 (1.68)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0 - 30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >iii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lumen width (μm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.04 (1.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >iv.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cellwall thickness (μm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98 (0.27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >v.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slenderness ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.95:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135 - 175:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vi.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Culm diameter (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.65 (0.78)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Culm wall thickness (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 (0.43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >viii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chem. length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.43 (1.65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ix.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bamboo specific gravity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68 (0.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proximate chemical analysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >i.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold water solubility (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09 (0.18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot water solubility (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.60 (0.52)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >iii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1% NaOH solubility (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8 (0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >iv.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alcohol benzene (1:2 v/v)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0 (0.70)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >v.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51 (0.36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 - 5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vi.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silicon (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pentosan (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.12 (0.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 - 33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 - 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >viii.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cellulose (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.64 (0.87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ix.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hellocellulose (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57 - 66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 - 62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 - 61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >=</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >x.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lignin (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.88 (0.43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(1) Fiber Dimensions are the weighted average of 130 fiber measurements. (2) Information on deciduous words and other non wood species used in this table are from Hunter (2001) and Asasutjarit (2005).</p><p>morphological properties and the density of the bamboo compare favourably with those of other woody and non-wood species used in the production of wood-cement composites in other countries. Of particular interest is the fiber slenderness ratio of 160.95:1 which is within the range of 135 to 175:1 reported for all species of bamboo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref29">29</xref>] and found to be greater than 85:1 for sugar-cane bagasse; 50:1 for deciduous Hardwood species and 58.8:1 for matured coconut coir fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref29">29</xref>] . High slenderness ratio of fibers/particles has been accepted to enhance the binder utilization efficiency of wood-based composites with attendant property improvements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>The proximate chemical analysis results are also in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and are also presented along side those for bambooes, deciduous hardwood species, sugar cane bagasse and coconut coir, all globally. The chemical constituents as well as leachable components compare favourable with those of bambooes globally as well as other com- peting woody and non-woody fiber sources used for composite manufacture globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref31">31</xref>] . Chew and his co-workers reported that the effects of soluble wood constituents on cement hydration and consequently on wood-cement composite panel properties can effectively be reduced by reducing the soluble sugars to as low as 0.28% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref12">12</xref>] . One other effective means of reducing the effects of soluble constituents on hydration is the use of additives. Available records indicate that incorporating CaCl<sub>2</sub> above 3% (cement wt basis) in furnish mixtures above 2:1 cement wood ratio (wt/wt—on oven dry wt wood basis) maybe adequate in creating optimal hydration conditions for effective bonding and optimal composite panel properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref32">32</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Composite Panel Properties</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> presents the results of Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) in bending as well as the water absorption (WA) and thickness swelling (TS) due to a 24 hrs horizontal water soak. Of the eighty (80 Nos) composite panels produced in this study representing all possible combination of production mix, the average property ranges from 25.0 to 73.45 N/mm<sup>2</sup> for MOR; 4128 to 15,065 N/mm<sup>2</sup> for MOE; 15.01% to 36.11% for WA; and 3.04% to 12.72% for TS due to a 24-hr horizontal water soak. All properties met the specifications of American National Standard Institute—ANSI A208-1 and ANSI A 208-2; British standard specifications (BSS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref33">33</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref35">35</xref>] for wood chipboard and methods of test for particleboard BS5669 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref35">35</xref>] and Malaysian Standard Specifications for wood cement Board MS 934 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref36">36</xref>] . <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> presents the summary of factorial analysis on the effects of each manufacturing variable and all possible interactions of the variables on composite panel properties.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Modulus of Rupture (MOR)</title><p>At any given cement—B. vulgaris mix ratio (1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1, 2.5:1 and 3:1 wt/wt) and soak treatment (control, cold water, hot water and 1% concentration of NaOH) the MOR increased as the ratio of the cement in the composite was increased (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). This is in accord with the findings of other workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref12">12</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref32">32</xref>] . The effect of cement—B. vulgaris mix ratio on MOR was found significant at 5% level of probability in a factorial analysis while the effects of mix ratio at all possible levels of interactions of production mix used in the study were significant at 0.01% level. A possible explanation is that increase in composite binder content ensured more effective coverage of the surface area of the flakes and thus enhanced a strong inter fiber/flake bond until an optimum binder content will be reached beyond which increase in binder content will no longer bring additional enhancement in properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref30">30</xref>] . Lingfei found optimal cement wood mix ratio to be 2.65:1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref20">20</xref>] . At any given cement—wood mix ratio and density, MOR was relatively enhanced as the soak treatment was changed from untreated/control to cold water, to hot water and to 1% concentration of NaOH treatments in that order (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). This is in agreement with the findings of other workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref37">37</xref>] . The differences due to the effects of soak treatments were significant at 0.05% level but the effects of soak treatment interactions at all possible levels with other production mix were significant at 0.01% level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The result is in conformity with known behaviour of wood-cement composites. It is generally understood that soluble sugars and extraneous materials interfer with cement hydration and consequently influence properties of composites. One accepted method of reducing the effects of these inhibitory constituents on cement hydration is the various soak treatment methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>The effects of Board density on the MOR of the composite panel was not found significant at 0.05% level of probability in a factorial analysis. This was not expected as high density implies higher compaction ratios for each given production mix (mix ratio and soak type). However, it is widely acknowledged that there is optimal compaction ratio above which further improvements in wood based composite properties as a result of compaction ratio no longer results in significant properties improvements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref30">30</xref>] . The exact optimum for wood-cement boards found in the literature varied with the choice of lignocellulosic furnish, mix ratio, soak treatment, cement/water mix ratio, additive type and quantity, etc. But there appears to be a synergy between panel density and all other production mix at all possible levels of interactions (density/soak treatment, density/cement: wood mix ratio; density/soak type/cement: wood mix ratio) as their effects were all found significant at 0.01% level. The explanation may be that above 800 kg/m<sup>3</sup> effect due to soak type and/or cement: B. vulgaris mix ratio far out-weighs the effects due to density alone. It may also mean that differences in relative volume of the B. vulgaris flakes used in making the boards at all cement: wood ratios was insignificant taking into cognizance the weight of cement and average mean density of the bamboo relative to panel density.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Modulus of Elasticity (MOE)</title><p>At any given composite panel density and cement: B. vulgaris flakes mix ratio, the composite MOE in bending increased as the soak treatment was changed from unsoaked flakes/control to cold water soak to Hot water soak to 1% concentration of NaOH soak in that order (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). At same level of soak treatment, the composite MOE increased as mix ratio was increased from 1:1 to 3:1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). These are in agreement with the findings of other workers who used different lignocellulosic furnish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref14">14</xref>] . The effects of each production variable (density/soak treatment/cement: wood mix ratio) as well as all their possible interactions on MOE were all found</p><table-wrap id="table3"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 3</object-id><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>. Properties of Bambusa vulgaris (bamboo)—cement composite panels as affected by variable production mix</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Soak  treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cement— B. vulgaris mix  ratio (wt/wt)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Composite  panel  density kg/m<sup>3</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mechanical properties</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Physical properties</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Modulus of  rupture N/mm<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Modulus of  Elasticity N/mm<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water absorption  due to 24 hrs soak (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness swelling due  24 hrs water soak (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.50 (4.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4876 (3.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.50 (5.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.72 (3.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00 (3.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5029 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.11 (4.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.02 (3.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.39 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7094 (3.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.42 (5.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95 (3.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.00 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8303 (4.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.11 (3.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.64 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.12 (3.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9111 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.50 (4.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.21 (2.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4128 (2.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.11 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.84 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.64 (3.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4324 (3.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.40 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.64 (5.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.00 (3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5754 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.02 (4.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44 (4.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.03 (3.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7182 (3.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.11 (3.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50 (3.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.15 (3.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8389 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.06 (2.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90 (3.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.50 (5.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6238 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.44 (4.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85 (4.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.67 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7014 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.51 (7.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08 (4.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.61 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9800 (3.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.13 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.11 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.11 (2.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,180 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.80 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02 (3.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.12 (4.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,300 (5.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.00 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81 (3.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cold water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.11 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4899 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.62 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.11 (3.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5295 (2.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.96 (2.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.53 (2.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.65 (5.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6611 (2.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.41 (4.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68 (2.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.80 (3.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7710 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.01 (3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.81 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9245 (3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.85 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48 (3.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.76 (4.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7746 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.12 (2.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.00 (2.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.01 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8821 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.15 (1.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.141 (2.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.81 (2.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,294 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.00 (2.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.01 (1.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.11 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,203 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.41 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.64 (1.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.89 (6.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14,736 (5.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.01 (1.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01 (3.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.06 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6416 (4.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.14 (2.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.15 (2.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.02 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7917 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.62 (2.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02 (3.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.81 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9721 (4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.05 (2.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 (2.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.00 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9800 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.17 (1.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.12 (3.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.11 (5.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,544 (3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.02 (1.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.08 (1.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.12 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9846 (5.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.67 (2.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00 (2.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.83 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,109 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.02 (1.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01 (1.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.10 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,314 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.14 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.21 (1.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.25 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,444 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.65 (1.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.22 (1.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.45 (4.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15,065 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.01 (2.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98 (0.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.91 (3.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7721 (4.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.88 (2.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.92 (2.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.11 (2.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9327 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.11 (1.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.11 (1.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.61 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,870 (4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.00 (1.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04 (1.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.55 (3.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,378 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.42 (1.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.80 (4.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,154 (3.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30 (1.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.04 (1.2)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Reported values are the weighted average of four (4) tests per production mix. ( ) = Nos in parenthesis are the co-efficient of variations in %. All test specimens were conditioned at 20˚C &#177; 2˚C and 65% &#177; 1% relative humidity for 2 weeks before test.</p><table-wrap id="table4"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 4</object-id><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>. Summary of factorial analysis showing the effects of manufacturing mix on properties of Bambusa vulgaris—ce- ment composite panel</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Source of variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Degree of freedom</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Mean square and F-values for panel properties</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Mechanical properties</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >24 hrs horizontal water soak</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Modulus  of rupture</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Modulus  of elasticity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Water  absorption</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Thickness  swelling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sub></sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MS &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sub>Tab</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Main effects</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cement/B. vulgaris mix ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92<sup>*K</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.18<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.11<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soak treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15<sup>*a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.29<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.40<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77<sup>*a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85<sup>NS</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.01<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.13<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First order interaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mix ratio/density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.52<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.835</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.18<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.88<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.54<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mix ratio/soak treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.12<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.77<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.11<sup>*K</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.816</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soak treatment/density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.512</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61<sup>*a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.69<sup>*a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Second order interaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mix ratio/density/soak treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.448</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.472</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.03<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.897</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.46<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>NS</sup>Not significant at 0.05 level (F<sub>Tab</sub> = 3.91). <sup>*</sup>Significant at 0.05 level. <sup>**</sup>Significant at 0.01 level. <sup>*k</sup>F<sub>Tab</sub> = 2.43 at 5% level of significance. <sup>*</sup>F<sub>Tab</sub> = 2.67 at 5% level of significance.</p><p>significant at 0.01% level of probability. This tends to suggest that MOE is a more sensitive measure of the importance of manufacturing variables on properties of wood/cement composites than MOR. It also goes to suggest that structural integrity as could be adjudged from compaction ratio and/or relative void volume play more significant roles in determining MOE of wood-cement composite panels. This later argument is in accord with the findings of Lingfei who corroborated properties with internal structures of bamboo/cement composite panels using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Thermo-gravimetric differential analysis (TG-DTA) and Scanning Election Microscopy (SEM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref20">20</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Physical Properties</title><sec id="s3_5_1"><title>3.5.1. Water Absorption (WA)</title><p>The cement/B. vulgaris composite panel’s WA properties after a 24 hrs horizontal water soak ranges from an average low of 15.01% to a max 36.11% (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) for all panel types produced. This is within the range reported in the literature for wood-cement composites of similar densities made from a wide range of wood/lig- nocellulosic furnish and treatments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref37">37</xref>] . The effects of all variable production mix used in the study (density, soak treatment and cement: wood ratio) on WA as well as those of their first order and third order interactions were all found significant at 0.01% level except for the effects of cement: wood mix ratio/soak treatment and soak treatment/density which were each found significant at the 0.05% level of probability in a factorial analysis. The implication is that higher cement content and density are possibly the more effective means of reducing WA even though all the variables are significant. Higher cement: wood mix ratio will ensure strong interparticle bond and at same time reduce moisture absorption by blocking the diffusional pathways while increase in density will reduce void volume within the composite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_5_2"><title>3.5.2. Thickness Swelling (TS)</title><p>The percentage thickness swelling (% TS) due to a 24 hrs horizontal water soak is in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The mean TS ranges from 3.04% to 12.72%. The TS is within the range reported in the literature of properties of wood-cement composites using a wide variety of lignocellulosic sources but of similar density range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref37">37</xref>] . Factorial analysis indicates that the effects of soak treatment and the interaction between soak treatment with density on TS was significant at 0.05% level while the effects of each of the other production variables and all other possible interaction levels (except soak/density) were significant at 0.01% level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). It does appear that a greater synergy is achieved using a combination of mix ratio and density in reducing TS. A direct relationship between panel density and TS exists while an inverse relationship between cement: wood mix ratio and TS exists. The logic here is that higher composite panel density at same mix ratio will lead to a higher TS if other factors are same. Conversely, increase in the cement: wood mix ratio at a constant density will reduce TS as mix ratio was increased. This is because the efficacy of the inter particle bond will help to reduce water absorption and consequently the magnitude of TS. However, all the three variables are effective means of reducing TS as the third order level of interactions shows.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The studies have proved that B. vulgaris grown in Anambra river basin, southeast, Nigeria can be used to produce cement composite panels of acceptable properties as all panels produced met property requirements of ANSI-208-1 and ANSI-208-2; BS 5669 and MS 934 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref33">33</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48500-ref36">36</xref>] . The effects of each of the production mix (soak treatment/density/cement—B. vulgaris mix ratio) were all found significant as their third order levels of interaction on MOR, MOE, TS and WA were all significant at the 0.01% level of probability in a factorial analysis. The composite panels made in this study will be suitable for load bearing constructions, partitioning, and flooring especially if the composite will not be subjected to long exposure to direct contact with water/hydrophilic fluids. The production of B. vulgaris composites will be sustainable in view of its rapid biomass production, and environmental friendliness as it could reduce pressure on forest trees and has high employment generation potentials in developing economies.</p><p>&lt; </p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES@endMarkP#wang#_title:ep!!!</title><disp-formula id="scirp.48500-formula4076"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-2710229x\ad63e01b-ad8d-4a35-9b43-6da367073474.png"/></disp-formula><p><sup>*</sup>Corresponding author.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.48500-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>KURIAKOSE</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DEVIPRASAD</surname><given-names> V. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> VAISAKH</surname><given-names> V.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>KURIAKOSE, S., DEVIPRASAD, V. AND VAISAKH, V.G.  MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF COIR REINFORCED POLYESTER COMPOSITE—AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION</article-title><source> INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND ADVANCED ENGINEERING</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 751</fpage>-<lpage>757</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>FUWAPE</surname><given-names> J.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>THE IMPACTS OF FOREST INDUSTRIES AND WOOD UTILIZATION ON THE ENVIRONMENT</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST RESEARCH</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 78</fpage>-<lpage>90</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CHEN, X.H. (2000) THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF WOOD INDUSTRY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY. FOREST PRODUCTS AND INDUSTRY, 26, 13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RAW MATERIALS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (RMRDC) (1996) REPORT ON THE TECHNO-ECONOMIC SURVEY OF THE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TASK FORCE ON PULP, PAPER PRODUCTS, PRINTING AND PUBLISHING SECTOR, LAGOS, 33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LEBEL, P.W., GUNTHER, J., WEBB, W., CLARK, W.C., FOOD, B., FASEHUN, F.E., SANWO, S.K. AND BADA, S.O. (1994) REVIEW OF WOOD-BASED SECTOR IN NIGEIA. FINAL REPORT PRESENTED TO FORMECU, FEDERAL MINISTRY OF AGRIC AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ABUJA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>AGNIHOTRI</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DUTT</surname><given-names> D. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> TYAGI</surname><given-names> C.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>AGNIHOTRI, S., DUTT, D. AND TYAGI, C.H.  COMPLETE CHARACTERIZATION OF BAGASSE OF EARLY SPECIES OF SACCHARUM OFFICINERUM—CO 89003 FOR PULP AND PAPER MAKING</article-title><source> BIORESOURCES</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 1197</fpage>-<lpage>1214</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ERAKHRUMEN</surname><given-names> A.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AREGHAN</surname><given-names> S.E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> OGUNLEYE</surname><given-names> M.B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LARINDE</surname><given-names> S.L. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ODEYALE</surname><given-names> O.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>ERAKHRUMEN, A.A., AREGHAN, S.E., OGUNLEYE, M.B., LARINDE, S.L. AND ODEYALE, O.O.  SELECTED PHYSICO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CEMENT BONDED PARTICLBOARD MADE FROM PINE (PINUS CARIBAEA M.) MIXTURE</article-title><source> SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EASSY</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 197</fpage>-<lpage>203</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>JORGE</surname><given-names> F.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PEREIRA</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FERREIRA</surname><given-names> J.M.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>WOOD-CEMENT COMPOSITES—A REVIEW</article-title><source> HOLZ ALS ROH- UND WERK- STOFF</source><volume> 62</volume>,<fpage> 370</fpage>-<lpage>377</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1007/S00107-004-0501-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">YOUNGQUIST, J.A. (1999) WOOD-BASED COMPOSITES AND PANEL PRODUCTS. IN: WOOD HANDBOOK: WOOD AS AN ENGINEERING MATERIAL. GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT FPL-113, USDA, FOREST SERVICE, FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY, MADISON, CHAPTER 10, 1-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>JAYABAL</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SATHIYAMURTHY</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LOGANATHAN</surname><given-names> K.T. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KALYANASUNDARAM</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>EFFECT OF SOAKING TIME AND CONCENTRATION OF NAOH SOLUTION ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF COIR-POLYESTER COMPOSITES</article-title><source> BULLETIN OF MATERIALS SCIENCE</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 567</fpage>-<lpage>574</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1007/S12034-012-0334-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>BAMISAYE</surname><given-names> J.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>CEMENT BONDED PARTICLE BOARD PRODUCTION FROM RICE HUSK IN SOUTHERN NIGERIA</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES</source><volume> 21</volume>,<fpage> 183</fpage>-<lpage>185</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CHEW</surname><given-names> L.T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SUDIN</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KASIM</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>CHEW, L.T., SUDIN, R. AND KASIM, J.  BAMBUSA VULGARIS FOR UREA AND CEMENT-BONDED PARTICLEBOARD MANUFACTURE</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 249</fpage>-<lpage>256</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>BADEJO</surname><given-names> S.O.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1987</year>)<article-title>AN INVESTIGATION ON THE INFLUENCE OF CEMENT BINDER CONTENT ON PROPERTIES OF CEMENT-BONDED PARTICLE BOARD FROM FOUR TROPICAL HARDWOODS</article-title><source> THE MALAYSIAN FORESTER</source><volume> 50</volume>,<fpage> 105</fpage>-<lpage>120</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>MOSLEMI</surname><given-names> A.A. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PFISTER</surname><given-names> S.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1987</year>)<article-title>MOSLEMI, A.A. AND PFISTER, S.C.  THE INFLUENCE OF CEMENT-WOOD RATIO AND CEMENT TYPE ON BENDING STRENGTH AND DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF WOOD-CEMENT COMPOSITE PANELS</article-title><source> WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 165</fpage>-<lpage>175</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ONUORAH</surname><given-names> O.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>PROPERTIES OF FIBERBOARDS MADE FROM OIL PALM (ELAEIS GUINEENSIS) STEM AND/OR MIXED TROPICAL HARDWOOD SAWMILL RESIDUES</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 497</fpage>-<lpage>507</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2009) ENVIRONMENTAL BAMBOO FOUNDATION WHY BAMBOO. WWW.BAMBOOMAN.COM.AU/BAMBOOTREATMENT/EBF.PHP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RENUKA, D.M., POORNIMA, N. AND GUPTAN, P.S. (2007) BAMBOO—THE NATURAL, GREEN AND ECO-FRIENDLY NEW-TYPE TEXTILE MATERIAL OF THE 21ST CENTURY. JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE ASSOCIATION, 221-224.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FANGCHUN, Z. (1999) THE 20TH CENTURY IN RETROSPECT FOR BAMBOO TRADE AND PROSPECTS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY. JOURNAL OF BAMBOO RESEARCH, 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CLAUDIO</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SOARES</surname><given-names> D.M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> VINICIUS</surname><given-names> G.C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MARIO</surname><given-names> R.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>CLAUDIO, H., SOARES, D.M., VINICIUS, G.C. AND MARIO, R.S.  PRODUCTION AND PROPERTIES OF MEDIUM DENSITY WOOD-CEMENT BOARDS PRODUCED WITH ORIENTED STRANDS AND SILICA FUME</article-title><source> MADERAS CIENCIAY TECHNOLOGIA</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 105</fpage>-<lpage>115</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MA, L.F. (2000) MANUFACTURE OF BAMBOO-CEMENT PARTICLEBOARD. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRENDS OF WOOD RESEARCH AND UTILIZATION, TOKYO, 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>LEE</surname><given-names> A.W.C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SHORT</surname><given-names> P.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>LEE, A.W.C. AND SHORT, P.H.  PRETREATING HARDWOOD FOR CEMENT-BONDED EXCELSIOR BOARD</article-title><source> FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL</source><volume> 39</volume>,<fpage> 68</fpage>-<lpage>70</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">KEAY, R.W.I., ONOCHIE, C.F.A. AND STANDFIELD, D.O. (1964) NIGERIAN TREES. VOLS. I &amp; II. FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, IBADAN.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LIESE, W. (1986) ANATOMY AND PROPERTIES OF BAMBOO. GTZ PUBLICATION, 196-207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION OF PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY (TAPPI) (1998) TEST METHODS. TAPPI PRESS, ATLANTA, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>AKPABIO</surname><given-names> U.D.I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL TREATMENT AND BLENDING OF TROPICAL (NIGERIAN) WOOD PULPS ON PAPER PROPERTIES</article-title><source> NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 32</fpage>-<lpage>43</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTINGS AND MATERIALS (1998) STANDARD TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING PROPERTIES OF WOOD-BASED FIBER AND PARTICLE PANEL MATERIALS. ASTM D1037-98, ANNUAL BOOK OF STANDARDS, PHILADEPHIA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MILLER, I. AND FREUD, E.J. (1975) PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS FOR ENGINEERS. PRENTICE-HALL INC., ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ASASUTJARIT, C., HIRUNLABH, J., KHEDARI, J., DAGUENET, M. AND QUENARD, D. (2005) COCONUT COIR CEMENT BOARD. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DURABILITY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS, LYON, 17-20 APRIL 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">HUNTER, W.R. (2001) NONWOOD PLANT FIBER CHARACTERISTICS. HUNTER CONSULT INCORPORATED, OTTAWA, 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">KELLY, W.M. (1997) CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW ON RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PROCESSING PARAMETERS AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF PARTICLEBOARD. GENERAL TECHNICAL FPL-10, USDA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>OGUNSILE</surname><given-names> B.O. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> UWAJEH</surname><given-names> C.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>OGUNSILE, B.O. AND UWAJEH, C.F.  EVALUATION OF THE PULP AND PAPER POTENTIALS OF A NIGERIAN GROWN BAMBUSA VULGARIS</article-title><source> WORLD APPLIED SCIENCES JOURNAL</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 536</fpage>-<lpage>541</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>OLORUNNISOLA</surname><given-names> A.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>EFFECTS OF PARTICLE GEOMETRY AND CHEMICAL ACCELERATOR ON STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF RATTAN-CEMENT COMPOSITE</article-title><source> AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 22</fpage>-<lpage>27</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (1994) NATIONAL HARDWOOD ASSOCIATION STANDARD FOR MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD (MFD). ANSI A 208-2-1994, GAITHERSBURG.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (1993) NATIONAL PARTICLE BOARD ASSOCIATION STANDARD FOR PARTICLEBOARD. ANSI A 208-1-1993, GAITHERSBURG.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BRITISH STANDARD INSTITUTION (1979) SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD CHIPBOARD AND METHODS OF TEST FOR PARTICLEBOARD. BS 5669:1979. BRITISH STANDARD INSTITUTION, LONDON.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MALAYSIA STANDARD INSTITUTE—MS 934 (1984) MALAYSIAN STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR WOOD-CEMENT BOARD. SIRIM, MALAYSIA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48500-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>OYAGADE</surname><given-names> A.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>THICKNESS SWELLING COMPONENTS AND WATER ABSORPTION OF CEMENT-BONDED PARTICLEBOARDS MADE FROM GMELINA WOOD, BAGASSE AND COCONUT HUSK</article-title><source> NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY</source><volume> 30</volume>,<fpage> 10</fpage>-<lpage>14</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>