<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Mathematical Finance</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2434</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmf.2014.43016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMF-45663</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS</subject><subject>PHYSICS &amp; MATHEMATICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A Simple Generalisation of Kirk’s Approximation for Multi-Asset Spread Options by the Lie-Trotter Operator Splitting Method</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chi-Fai</surname><given-names>Lo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Institute of Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>cflo@phy.cuhk.edu.hk</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>04</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>187</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	In this paper, by means of the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method, we have presented a new unified approach not only to rigorously derive Kirk’s approximation but also to obtain a generalisation for multi-asset spread options in a straightforward manner. The derived price formula for the multi-asset spread option bears a great resemblance to Kirk’s approximation in the two-asset case. More importantly, our approach is able to provide a new perspective on Kirk’s approximation and the generalization; that is, they are simply equivalent to the Lie-Trotter operator splitting approximation to the Black-Scholes equation.
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Lognormal Random Variables</kwd><kwd> Black-Scholes Equation</kwd><kwd> Spread Options</kwd><kwd> Kirk’s Approximation</kwd><kwd> Lie-Trotter Operator Splitting Method</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Spread options, whose payoff is contingent upon the price difference of two underlying assets form the simplest type of multi-asset options, are very popular in markets as diverse as interest rate markets, currency and foreign exchange markets, commodity markets, and energy markets nowadays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref1">1</xref>] . Despite the rapid development of spread options, pricing spread options is a very challenging task and receives much attention in the literature. The major difficulty lies in the lack of knowledge about the distribution of the spread of two correlated</p><p>lognormal random variables. The simplest approach is to evaluate the expectation of the final payoff over the joint probability distribution of the two correlated lognormal underlyings by means of numerical integration. However, practitioners often prefer to use analytical approximations rather than numerical methods because of their computational ease. Among various analytical approximations, e.g. Carmona and Durrleman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref1">1</xref>] , Deng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref2">2</xref>] , Bjerksund and Stensland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref3">3</xref>] , Venkatramana and Alexander [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref4">4</xref>] , Kirk’s approximation seems to be the most widely used and is the current market standard, especially in the energy markets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref5">5</xref>] . It is well known that Kirk’s approximation extends from Margrabe’s exchange option formula with no rigorous derivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref6">6</xref>] . Recently, Lo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref7">7</xref>] applied the idea of WKB method to provide a derivation of Kirk’s approximation and discuss its validity. Nevertheless, it is not straightforward to provide a generalisation of Kirk’s approximation for the case of multi-asset spread option via this approach.</p><p>Accordingly, it is the aim of this paper to present a simple unified approach, namely the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref8">8</xref>] , not only to rigorously derive Kirk’s approximation but also to obtain a generalisation for the case of multi-asset spread option in a straightforward manner. The derived price formula for the multi-asset spread option bears a great resemblance to Kirk’s approximation in the two-asset case. More importantly, the proposed approach is able to provide a new perspective on Kirk’s approximation and the generalisation; that is, they are simply equivalent to the Lie-Trotter operator splitting approximation to the Black-Scholes equation. Illustrative numerical examples for the three-asset spread options are also shown to demonstrate both the accuracy and efficiency of the extended Kirk approximation. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that our approach is completely different from the extended Kirk approximation proposed by Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref9">9</xref>] . Li et al. suggested to approximate the sum of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\6663d4cb-6d20-450a-8c9c-ab85e466fc5f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> lognormal assets as a single lognormal variable and then apply Kirk’s approximation directly to this single lognormal variable and the remaining asset to price the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\eec63f2f-5cbf-40c4-9af9-c5e98611725f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asset spread option.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Two-Asset Spread Options</title><p>The price of a European call spread option obeys the two-dimensional Black-Scholes equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula1"><label>(1)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b2c887c7-64c9-4209-8def-7cddf01f4113.png"/></disp-formula><p>with the final payoff condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula2"><label>(2)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\5e2fe017-5435-45bc-b94e-0311f9bbce8d.png"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\f46d79bc-e75f-425a-bfa3-2bed67758725.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\9d0ad1c1-e14b-4652-95e5-798fbfc4b77b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the future prices of the two lognormal underlying assets, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\12ea8018-98b7-4c45-93e0-d68b3aaccc4e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\23dfaef7-bd8f-4645-bf41-2bea5beb452c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the vola- tilities, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2f2fdac7-c1e9-41bb-b224-d6ffecc99058.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the correlation between the two assets, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\573e3a12-024a-4f79-adf9-af7182ea3f9e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the strike price, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\11eb6e6e-c3f1-4d03-8849-a9fa9fee75d8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the risk-free interest rate, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b18c34d7-412c-4ba6-a32d-073d52f2edfe.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the time-to-maturity. It is well known that no analytical solution is available in closed form and one needs to resort to numerical methods. In the following, we propose a simple derivation of the well-known price formula of Kirk’s approximation by means of the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Proposition 1:</p><p>The price of the two-asset spread option can be approximated by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula3"><label>(3)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\193c74a2-4ed3-4636-abef-95458bd59f8e.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula4"><label>(4)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b9ac7bac-4cae-46df-8fed-8a81bd989238.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula5"><label>(5)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\81f62ce4-50d6-4552-ac3e-b98abd1971c2.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula6"><label>(6)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\27b5471b-e5a4-46b4-a093-9e85598c4cbb.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula7"><label>(7)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\868ee58c-6c62-4c97-a47a-b11f5e647905.png"/></disp-formula><p>Proof:</p><p>In terms of the two new variables</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula8"><label>(8)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\4bdf503d-3f31-465d-852e-265316e9889c.png"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (1) can be rewritten as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula9"><label>(9)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\03e3e3f4-e371-41f2-9d6e-5df5f7594466.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula10"><label>(10)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\d9342816-802b-4157-af09-8bbd7b332796.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula11"><label>(11)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\7fce4ba7-2315-4523-822a-3732f0cd0453.png"/></disp-formula><p>The final payoff condition now becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula12"><label>(12)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\87459ce3-17b7-421e-9a87-1ccfbb147e27.png"/></disp-formula><p>Accordingly, the formal solution of Equation (9) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula13"><label>(13)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\7c3e3018-c376-4195-aa11-e10e3be7fe93.png"/></disp-formula><p>Since the exponential operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\30d40c6f-7bdd-422e-bae6-354d70c0ccfb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is difficult to evaluate, the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref8">8</xref>] can be applied to approximate the operator by (see the Appendix)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula14"><label>(14)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\e848b581-6125-4002-9946-a75dd58e4dca.png"/></disp-formula><p>and obtain an approximation to the formal solution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\4fd198ef-e5ee-42cd-ad67-1a5acb5fc499.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, namely</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula15"><label>(15)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\d08b79db-c960-41e3-9b23-aaf1b4e0f802.png"/></disp-formula><p>for</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula16"><label>(16)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\812ac02b-bfe2-44d8-be83-733a54011e6d.png"/></disp-formula><p>It is not difficult to recognise that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b23ce90c-9c89-4d52-a0e1-40c1915d0b76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the partial differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula17"><label>(17)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\c39a4fe4-7e66-4aec-8d33-453aece3fae3.png"/></disp-formula><p>with the initial condition:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\5c63e4bf-0394-4069-8297-81b2c6ab1976.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and that the admissible solution is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula18"><label>(18)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\74a92045-ab57-49db-899c-6c8ad7210f51.png"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\7627b28c-ab04-4b70-801c-f65ac4055de6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the cumulative normal distribution function and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula19"><label>(19)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b8de01c1-4224-421a-bea3-fd3ab771196d.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula20"><label>(20)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\ab8eb877-a564-426a-a387-52a87d812e38.png"/></disp-formula><p>As a result, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula21"><label>(21)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\37eddc63-edeb-48a4-9de7-0d176457b1bd.png"/></disp-formula><p>which is exactly the approximate price formula given in Equation (3). (Q.E.D.)</p><p>In terms of the spot asset prices, namely<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\cbc57ecc-92dd-41c7-a436-136f1e5a52eb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the price formula given in Equation (3) turns out to be identical to the price formula of Kirk’s approximation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula22"><label>(22)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\02e34e1c-4b78-4d08-9be1-7489cce6ea5a.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula23"><label>(23)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\003f74ca-5cb6-4c56-ad1d-2f47afe1c0de.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula24"><label>(24)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\232d3c55-3467-47e8-b665-6cc0b1c8ff57.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula25"><label>(25)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2e9536f0-b956-4e90-b71a-72dafefea69b.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula26"><label>(26)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\55702284-b125-40ee-b137-8e638099f904.png"/></disp-formula><p>It should be noted that for the Lie-Trotter operator splitting approximation to be valid, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\bb4546eb-6f9e-4a3a-b262-1bfa630c8cef.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>needs to be sufficiently small, namely<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\9b2d7811-f01e-46e1-aaa0-1e605f7b45e0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In accordance with Equation (25), this implies that Kirk’s approximation is more favourable for positive correlation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\bef06b7a-4eba-4940-ba83-4b827d3fa2c6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> between the two assets. Furthermore, for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b4f1b961-0c68-4ce1-b8a9-307df5bf4359.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\501f5aa1-1805-4e2e-a9f7-608731086171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\607bd785-94a9-4335-b1fa-0daba7b4c21a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> commute so that the Lie-Trotter splitting approximation becomes exact and Margrabe’s formula is recovered.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Multi-Asset Spread Options</title><p>To price a European <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\ce57bae4-f372-4223-934d-5618aa2ad0fd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asset call spread option, we need to solve the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\824636f0-f209-464f-95d2-8757d9312af7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-dimensional Black-Scholes equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula27"><label>(27)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\d5befe33-2fe8-448b-a7d2-3e15eb7e9126.png"/></disp-formula><p>subject to the final payoff condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula28"><label>(28)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\3b4741db-bb2f-48d6-beaa-833314cf283e.png"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\73924767-5385-4d2b-8179-b22700457136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the future price of the lognormal underlying asset <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b8e6268f-d9b9-4d09-a4f5-2bfb15954102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the volatility<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\6660be79-5df3-4365-9596-5f4ba3d044cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\4872f4e3-6e23-4f9f-9f6b-67616d14d8e0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the correlation between the assets <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\bbcd1705-0be6-47c0-880b-c6c67a892285.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\62ca9f47-0c40-4984-b4df-fa78a96b5859.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\93811b80-5f3d-419a-8b12-73178fe29f25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the strike price, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\44efdc79-49c4-46b2-8c94-547c07765530.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the risk-free interest rate, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\3c6b5473-e2d1-4dd3-affa-6e455cd3f7a5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the time- to-maturity. Unfortunately, this is a very formidable task. In the following, we apply the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method to derive a closed-form approximate price formula for the multi-asset spread option, which bears a great resemblance to the price formula of Kirk’s approximation in the two-asset case.</p><p>Proposition 2:</p><p>The price of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\4faa754d-1c92-40bf-9db0-adf2859c385c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-asset spread option can be approximated by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula29"><label>(29)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\113c617e-643c-4228-8baf-2de11d175281.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula30"><label>(30)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2e6766ed-dd87-4e86-bc1c-96d2af10ece9.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula31"><label>(31)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\05937724-ba42-42db-9ca3-d08d563d678b.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula32"><label>(32)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\cdf78b3b-1c9b-46d9-af04-28ecb6562589.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula33"><label>(33)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\43c9cd79-6750-4109-988a-05fbe1a0a326.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula34"><label>(34)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\880b0bdc-5142-43b4-a93b-6d0fd5066fdf.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula35"><label>(35)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2615e602-f990-4a85-8879-c243d5872201.png"/></disp-formula><p>Proof:</p><p>Introducing the new variables: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\93767c9d-e6bf-470f-81f6-c312d5fa0e97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\863535cf-1bc7-484d-9b1c-155f6a7062e2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\1ff6d945-727d-4fe9-9be4-27586206d47a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Equation (27) can be cast in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula36"><label>(36)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2ebbf9fc-297a-4c15-b0fc-d6ed47ad93da.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula37"><label>(37)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\9581a78e-c321-4a0d-9c2d-60f61a1e3780.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula38"><label>(38)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\dbe90b83-3399-48df-a4fa-fdbf3909e557.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula39"><label>(39)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\1b824dc3-56ab-418e-8a71-9592099c7d29.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula40"><label>(40)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\995c8066-b1a2-432d-9186-e34550227b48.png"/></disp-formula><p>The formal solution of Equation (36) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula41"><label>(41)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\f3325dd1-dc7e-4b02-9663-ccca50228521.png"/></disp-formula><p>Then we apply the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref10">10</xref>] to obtain an approximation to the formal solution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\402981eb-c4bb-4d60-8cc6-6e36291feebd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, namely (see the Appendix)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula42"><label>(42)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\561b39f1-bc7d-4dbe-8861-bd8fc1a76a48.png"/></disp-formula><p>where the relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula43"><label>(43)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\66bc0506-85fc-4dc9-b94e-c52c6a52a5c0.png"/></disp-formula><p>is utilized.</p><p>Next, in terms of the two new variables</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula44"><label>(44)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\d4a9d5b2-4a37-4197-8ffb-db02018ced0d.png"/></disp-formula><p>we rewrite <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2ccb3075-f6d5-4443-8afc-3f8bef9a7132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula45"><label>(45)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\fb6852fd-65f3-49a6-aa1f-9b15ec0617dd.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula46"><label>(46)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b7afe95d-3628-4442-960b-2d2bfb7f0a10.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula47"><label>(47)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\f1e2d654-0fed-4fca-80d2-e157d3d6c5f0.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula48"><label>(48)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\8ccfedf1-5b9b-4b93-a590-e48705787189.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula49"><label>(49)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\c3af7efe-e1ee-420d-8f9e-7e2b0a74df49.png"/></disp-formula><p>It is clear that the exponential operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\43855897-c973-4e5f-bad0-5156032c02bb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is difficult to evaluate, so we need to apply the</p><p>Lie-Trotter operator splitting method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45663-ref10">10</xref>] again to approximate the operator by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\0d408a3c-1c1b-4b22-ae41-650a6e4cf9d2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As a</p><p>result, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula50"><label>(50)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\a3a934f3-9e83-4c8d-9532-27af349fc4e9.png"/></disp-formula><p>for</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula51"><label>(51)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\508873e2-a9b9-492d-b797-e4d74399495e.png"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\618df225-cd33-44cf-94e6-e397c87e1e06.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is independent of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\48ecfe43-3169-4386-93d2-20580caa3e85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the standard workhorse of the Black-Scholes model can be used to evaluate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\9ed9bc50-3745-42fd-85f2-cb73d5ac3164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula52"><label>(52)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\782f1ba2-98b2-424d-bcf9-4240a61a307e.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula53"><label>(53)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\6f71867d-1631-4c62-b783-4a05ffa9d1ec.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula54"><label>(54)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\70b4508c-5688-4b2f-a783-3ee2d7a69512.png"/></disp-formula><p>It is obvious that this approximate solution is identical to the approximate price formula given in Equation (29). (Q.E.D.)</p><p>In terms of the spot asset prices, namely<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\9cd3f008-f7e2-41ea-ab67-819ca25c3708.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the price formula given in Equation (29) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula55"><label>(55)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b6f5d73d-b014-4cf7-bcac-b0fe6c8a12ed.png"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula56"><label>(56)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\01bd6b8b-04de-49a6-a5e5-6a1d7fd17ffd.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula57"><label>(57)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\d143daa1-bedb-4c6a-b77d-f140e4a06026.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula58"><label>(58)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\95b388b4-2e80-4815-8d5f-6d68e7a042b5.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula59"><label>(59)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\8c7d0dcb-8914-4e87-aa71-dea85ad5b433.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.45663-formula60"><label>(60)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\5e358a9d-318e-41e7-b347-86b4622bae17.png"/></disp-formula><p>Obviously, this approximate price formula resembles the price formula of Kirk’s approximation in the two-asset case very closely. In fact, by setting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\b0a952b2-b310-419e-8489-ad703350c8fb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we can recover Kirk’s approximation readily. Moreover, for the Lie-Trotter splitting approximation to be valid, we need to require <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\598bff6d-25c9-4b4d-b800-bb52a484237b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be sufficiently small, namely<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\7cf16429-64d9-4ab4-a62b-87194437568e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In accordance with Equation (58), this implies that the extended Kirk approximation is more favourable for those cases with positive effective correlation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\8b5cd3c3-0684-44ae-971b-b1a3dca36988.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Illustrative Numerical Examples for the Three-Asset Spread Options</title><p>In this section, illustrative numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the accuracy of the extended Kirk approximation for the three-asset spread options. Although most spread options involve two assets only, yet there is a growing demand for three-asset spread options which can be found in the models for power plants or their financial equivalents—tolling contracts. We examine a simple three-asset spread option with the final payoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\72bb1145-17b8-4258-bee5-819fe611cc33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> tabulates the approximate option prices estimated by the extended Kirk approximation for different values of the strike price <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\1be6e01f-bb39-459b-9e1e-fed02840b80a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and time-to-maturity<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\6ef7524f-578a-4176-bc3b-0f916c1e30ca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Other input model parameters are set as follows:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\ff3d331a-5670-41e2-bee5-0151214dac10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\cbcd646f-7276-4b26-aa53-b9affb70f00f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\7592078a-b008-4033-9d3c-2daa11ebe760.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\42918be3-2ec8-4c82-a03b-a56aba2992aa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\fa8f839d-20b9-4451-a6b7-5f00ced3ccbd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\29223283-fd15-4f03-8a5b-37ef443f8fe4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\3c050952-47e9-44b2-802b-39e4d9b2d013.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\f447745e-ddde-44cc-b01a-34f4e2aac5fd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Monte Carlo estimates and the corresponding standard deviations are also presented for comparison. It is observed that the computed errors of the approximate option prices are capped at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\e3fd881e-a657-4f26-9649-f0c409b38aca.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (in magnitude). In fact, most of them are less than<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\2729733d-b2a6-46d6-bb39-243f66d85763.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> the effect of increasing the three vol- atilities (from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\1cf8b114-c5f7-4a8b-ba5b-30eb25af823f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\fac41d40-dd01-4ddc-965e-4e7b6ef9f33c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) upon the approximate estimation of the option prices is investigated. Obviously only a slight increase occurs in the computed errors, and these errors are still less than <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\fda5c17f-0230-4e2e-9189-2426f4b18782.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (in magnitude). Finally, we study a case in which all the three volatilities are different, namely<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\3b091bec-79a5-4635-9f39-3c97dfca12dd.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\da6c8c25-4037-4eff-8b77-7aeddc6fa865.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\706376a0-8f66-4e0e-a9dd-012dd2021b07.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, while the other parameters remain the same. According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the computed errors generally increase a little bit in this case but they do not exceed <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\4-1490268x\8398fde2-adf0-4b95-98c7-f86bea311389.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (in magnitude). As a result, it can be concluded that the extended Kirk approximation for the three-asset spread option is found to be very accurate and efficient.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we have proved that Kirk’s approximation for two-asset spread options can be rigorously derived</p><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Prices of a European three-asset call spread option. Other input parameters are: r = 0.05, s<sub>1</sub> = s<sub>2</sub> = s<sub>3</sub> = 0.3, r<sub>12</sub> = 0.4, r<sub>23</sub> = 0.2, r<sub>13</sub> = 0.8, S<sub>1</sub> = 50, S<sub>2</sub> = 60 and S<sub>3</sub> = 150. Here “EK” refers to the extended Kirk approximation while “MC” denotes the Monte Carlo estimates with 900,000,000 replications. The relative errors of the “EK” option prices with respect to the “MC” estimates are also presented</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >K\T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.7761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.1974</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5763 &#177; 0.0089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4735 &#177; 0.0142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8471 &#177; 0.0185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.2841 &#177; 0.0264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3576 &#177; 0.0086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5286 &#177; 0.0124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1541 &#177; 0.0176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8573 &#177; 0.0276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9586</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6608 &#177; 0.0068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9572 &#177; 0.0109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7197 &#177; 0.0161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6072 &#177; 0.0244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5805</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4903 &#177; 0.0051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7565 &#177; 0.0106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5421 &#177; 0.0141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5302 &#177; 0.0260</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8140 &#177; 0.0040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9058 &#177; 0.0086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6109 &#177; 0.0136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6195 &#177; 0.0245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Prices of a European three-asset call spread option. Other input parameters are: r = 0.05, s<sub>1</sub> = s<sub>2</sub> = s<sub>3</sub> = 0.6, r<sub>12</sub> = 0.4, r<sub>23</sub> = 0.2, r<sub>13</sub> = 0.8, S<sub>1</sub> = 50, S<sub>2</sub> = 60 and S<sub>3</sub> = 150. Here “EK” refers to the extended Kirk approximation while “MC” denotes the Monte Carlo estimates with 900,000,000 replications. The relative errors of the “EK” option prices with respect to the “MC” estimates are also presented</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >K\T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.0640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.3820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.2066 &#177; 0.0168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1269 &#177; 0.0278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5402 &#177; 0.0425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.2242 &#177; 0.0716</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4529</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5976</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2944</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4495</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4778 &#177; 0.0172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6076 &#177; 0.0268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2508 &#177; 0.0390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.2275 &#177; 0.0787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.2150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0290 &#177; 0.0171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.2938 &#177; 0.0266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1079 &#177; 0.0362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3425 &#177; 0.0656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2587</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.8938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8527 &#177; 0.0182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1753 &#177; 0.0234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1113 &#177; 0.0381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.5466 &#177; 0.0628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9347 &#177; 0.0151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2410 &#177; 0.0236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2513 &#177; 0.0345</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8658 &#177;0.0637</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 3</object-id><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>. Prices of a European three-asset call spread option. Other input parameters are: r = 0.05, s<sub>1</sub> = 0.5, s<sub>2</sub> = 0.4, s<sub>3</sub> = 0.3, r<sub>12</sub> = 0.4, r<sub>23</sub> = 0.2, r<sub>13</sub> = 0.8, S<sub>1</sub> = 50, S<sub>2</sub> = 60 and S<sub>3</sub> = 150. Here “EK” refers to the extended Kirk approximation while “MC” denotes the Monte Carlo estimates with 900,000,000 replications. The relative errors of the “EK” option prices with respect to the “MC” estimates are also presented</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >K\T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.4620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-1.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9635 &#177; 0.0092</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0801 &#177; 0.0119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7922 &#177; 0.0191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8014 &#177; 0.0242</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6503</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.8630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-1.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6905 &#177; 0.0078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0301 &#177; 0.0118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9316 &#177; 0.0163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1380 &#177; 0.0238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3085</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9101 &#177; 0.0074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3342 &#177; 0.0104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3206 &#177; 0.0172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6452 &#177; 0.0223</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6664</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9501</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.1989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6426 &#177; 0.0064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0004 &#177; 0.0092</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9627 &#177; 0.0145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3286 &#177; 0.0210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0838</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1291</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8758 &#177; 0.0058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0242 &#177; 0.0081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8587 &#177; 0.0147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1882 &#177; 0.0216</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>by applying the Lie-Trotter operator splitting approximation to the Black-Scholes equation, and that for cases with vanishing strike prices, the Lie-Trotter splitting approximation becomes exact and Margrabe’s formula is recovered. Our derivation also shows that Kirk’s approximation is more favourable for those cases with two positively correlated assets. Moreover, we apply the Lie-Trotter operator splitting method to obtain a genera- lisation of Kirk’s approximation for multi-asset spread options in a straightforward manner. The derived price formula for the multi-asset spread option closely resembles Kirk’s approximation in the two-asset case. By setting the total number of assets to be two, we can recover Kirk’s approximation readily. Thus, the ge- neralisation possesses the same nice features as Kirk’s approximation. For instance, as shown by the illustrative examples, the generalization is found to be very accurate and efficient in pricing the multi-asset spread options. All in all, our approach is able to provide a new perspective on Kirk’s approximation and the generalisation; that is, they are simply equivalent to the Lie-Trotter operator splitting approximation to the Black-Scholes equation.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.45663-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CARMONA</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DURRLEMAN</surname><given-names> V. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>PRICING AND HEDGING SPREAD OPTIONS</article-title><source> SIAM REVIEW</source><volume> 45</volume>,<fpage> 627</fpage>-<lpage>685</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1137/S0036144503424798</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>DENG</surname><given-names> S.J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LI</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ZHOU</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>CLOSED-FORM APPROXIMATION FOR SPREAD OPTION PRICES AND GREEKS</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF DERIVATIVES</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 58</fpage>-<lpage>80</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.3905/JOD.2008.702506</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BJERKSUND, P. AND STENSLAND, G. (2011) CLOSED FORM SPREAD OPTION VALUATION. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, IFIRST, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>VENKATRAMANA</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ALEX</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> C. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>CLOSED FORM APPROXIMATION FOR SPREAD OPTIONS</article-title><source> APPLIED MATHEMATICAL FINANCE</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 447</fpage>-<lpage>472</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1080/1350486X.2011.567120</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">KIRK, E. (1995) CORRELATION IN THE ENERGY MARKETS. MANAGING ENERGY PRICE RISK. RISK PUBLICATIONS AND ENRON, LONDON, 71-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>MARGRABE</surname><given-names> W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1978</year>)<article-title>THE VALUE OF AN OPTION TO EXCHANGE ONE ASSET FOR ANOTHER</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF FINANCE</source><volume> 33</volume>,<fpage> 177</fpage>-<lpage>186</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1111/J.1540-6261.1978.TB03397.X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>LO</surname><given-names> C.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>A SIMPLE DERIVATION OF KIRK’S APPROXIMATION FOR SPREAD OPTIONS</article-title><source> APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS</source><volume> 26</volume>,<fpage> 904</fpage>-<lpage>907</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.AML.2013.04.004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>TROTTER</surname><given-names> H.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1958</year>)<article-title>APPROXIMATION OF SEMI-GROUPS OF OPERATORS</article-title><source> PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 887</fpage>-<lpage>919</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.2140/PJM.1958.8.887</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>LI</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ZHOU</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DENG</surname><given-names> S.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>MULTI-ASSET SPREAD OPTION PRICING AND HEDGING</article-title><source> QUANTITATIVE FINANCE</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 305</fpage>-<lpage>324</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1080/14697680802626323</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>TROTTER</surname><given-names> H.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1959</year>)<article-title>ON THE PRODUCT OF SEMI-GROUPS OF OPERATORS</article-title><source> PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 545</fpage>-<lpage>551</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1090/S0002-9939-1959-0108732-6</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SUZUKI</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1985</year>)<article-title>DECOMPOSITION FORMULAS OF EXPONENTIAL OPERATORS AND LIE EXPONENTIALS WITH SOME APPLICATIONS TO QUANTUM MECHANICS AND STATISTICAL PHYSICS</article-title><source> JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS</source><volume> 26</volume>,<fpage> 601</fpage>-<lpage>612</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1063/1.526596</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>DROZDOV</surname><given-names> A.N. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BREY</surname><given-names> J.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>OPERATOR EXPANSIONS IN STOCHASTIC DYNAMICS</article-title><source> PHYSICAL REVIEW E</source><volume> 57</volume>,<fpage> 1284</fpage>-<lpage>1289</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1103/PHYSREVE.57.1284</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>HATANO</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SUZUKI</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>HATANO, N. AND SUZUKI, M.  FINDING EXPONENTIAL PRODUCT FORMULAS OF HIGHER ORDERS</article-title><source> LECTURE NOTES IN PHYSICS</source><volume> 679</volume>,<fpage> 37</fpage>-<lpage>68</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45663-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>BLANES</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CASAS</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CHARTIER</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MURUA</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>OPTIMIZED HIGHER-ORDER SPLITTING METHODS FOR SOME CLASSES OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS</article-title><source> MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION</source><volume> 82</volume>,<fpage> 1559</fpage>-<lpage>1576</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1090/S0025-5718-2012-02657-3</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>