<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCT</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Cancer Therapy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2151-1934</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jct.2014.57077</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCT-46963</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>MEDICINE &amp; HEALTHCARE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Factors Associated with Need for Drainage of Pleural Effusion after Diaphragm Surgery</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rachel</surname><given-names>M. Whynott</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nauman</surname><given-names>Khurshid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seema</surname><given-names>Nayak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>J. Manahan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>John</surname><given-names>P. Geisler</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Athens Regional Health Services, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Georgia/Georgia Regents University, Athens, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Geisler.jp@gmail.com(JPG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>06</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>680</fpage><lpage>684</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	Background: Diaphragm
surgery is common with advanced ovarian malignancies. The purpose of this study
is to determine associated factors with the need for drainage of pleural
effusion after diaphragm surgery. Methods and Materials: A retrospective chart
review was undertaken in all women undergoing debulking surgery for stage
IIIc/IV ovarian cancer from 2007-2009. Results: One hundred and eight patients
were found to be eligible for the study, but 73 were the primary focus of this
paper due to having undergone debulking surgery, including diaphragmatic
surgery, from 2007-2009. All 73 had ablation with the argon beam coagulator, 7
had a full thickness resection, and 7 had extensive peritoneal peel. Five
patients had preoperative effusions. Only 7 patients required chest drainage
postoperatively. Pre-operative ascites correlated closely with postoperative
effusion (p-value = 0.031) but not with drainage (p-value = 0.068). The mean
age of patients requiring drainage was significantly older (73 years) than that
of patients who did not require drainage (60 years) (p-value = 0.002).
Conclusion: Older patients undergoing diaphragm surgery are more likely to require
chest tube or thoracentesis due to concurrent symptoms. Pre-operative ascites
correlates closely with the development of postoperative effusion after
diaphragm surgery.
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pleural Drainage</kwd><kwd> Diaphragm Surgery</kwd><kwd> Ovarian Cancer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the most accepted method of management of ovarian cancer, with the goal of no residual cancer after the procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref2">2</xref>] . The majority of patients with ovarian cancer present in FIGO stage III or IV, and most patients are offered this management. This procedure often includes upper abdominal surgery to reduce tumor burden. Ovarian cancer cells travel along with peritoneal fluid, and during its clockwise movement, the cancer cells may get deposited in the upper abdomen. Because of this, the right hemidiaphragm is a common place to find ovarian cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref3">3</xref>] . There are several different methods to rid the diaphragm of disease, including diaphragmatic ablation (DA), diaphragmatic resection (DR), and peritoneal peel or peritonectomy (PP).</p><p>Cytoreductive surgery including the diaphragm and upper abdomen is feasible with good success [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref4">4</xref>] . However, upper abdominal surgery, specifically diaphragmatic surgery, is associated with some morbidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref5">5</xref>] . A common postoperative morbidity encountered is the development of pleural effusion. Another relatively known morbidity is pneumothorax. Postoperative pleural effusion is usually seen within a few days of surgery. Effusions may present as dyspnea, decreased pulse oximetry, and decreased breath sounds on the affected side. Computed tomographic scan or a plain chest radiograph is usually diagnostic. Management of pleural effusion may require drainage using thoracentesis or a chest tube if the patient is symptomatic.</p><p>Currently, there is no consensus as to whether all the patients undergoing radical debulking, including diaphragmatic surgery, require a prophylactic chest tube placement in the operating room. There is also no consensus on whether or not scans should be performed in postoperative asymptomatic patients. To address the need for prophylactic chest tubes, we undertook a retrospective analysis looking at the outcomes and morbidity following diaphragmatic surgery in our gynecologic cancer population.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods and Materials</title><p>This study was approved by the institutional review board. All patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer undergoing primary debulking surgery from January 2007 through December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed, totaling 108. Patients undergoing diaphragmatic surgery were the primary focus of this analysis. No patients were knowingly excluded. We defined diaphragmatic surgery as diaphragmatic resection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), diaphragmatic ablation and/or diaphragmatic peel/peritonectomy of the diaphragm.</p><p>Seventy three patients were identified to meet the above criteria. Charts on all 108 patients were then analyzed for demographic data, stage of cancer, histological type of cancer, type of surgery, extent of surgery, tumor burden after surgery, preoperative pleural effusion, preoperative CA125, prealbumin level, postoperative evidence of pleural effusion (confirmed by radiological testing), use of thoracentesis or chest tube placements, and postoperative complications. All pulmonary complications were attributed to the surgery. All postoperative pleural effusions were radiologically confirmed. The decision to ablate, peel, or resect the diaphragm was made by the attending gynecologic oncologist at the time of surgery.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>One hundred eight patients underwent primary debulking surgery, and the 73 patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery including diaphragmatic surgery were analyzed. Demographic characteristics of all patients undergoing primary surgery are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The mean age in years of patients undergoing diaphragm surgery was 61, with median of 63. The mean preoperative CA 125 was 564 IU/dl and the median was 189 IU/ml. The mean of the preoperative prealbumin was 16 mg/dl and the median was 14 mg/dl. Five of the 7 patients requiring chest drainage had documented preoperative effusion. The average patient undergoing diaphragm surgery was obese, with a mean BMI of 34 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and a median of 32 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Preoperative ascites correlated with postoperative effusion (p-value = 0.031), but not with the need for drainage (p-value = 0.068). The mean age of patients requiring drainage was significantly older (73 years) than those not requiring it (60 years) (p-value = 0.002). There was no correlation between postoperative effusion and the extent of diaphragm surgery. There was also no correlation between performance of other upper abdominal surgery (liver resection, splenectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy) and postoperative effusion.</p><p>Seventy-three of 108 patients undergoing primary surgical debulking had diaphragmatic ablation of a portion of the diaphragm with the argon beam coagulator, 7 patients (9.5% of the 73) had full thickness diaphragmatic resection, and 7 patients (9.5%) had a diaphragm peel/peritonectomy. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> documents the differences in survival and other characteristics between those who underwent diaphragm surgery and those who did not. During the debulking procedures, 27.4% of those undergoing diaphragm surgery had colon resection while 12.3% patients had small bowel resection, compared to 17.1% and 8.6% of those not requiring diaphragm surgery (p</p><fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p> Left side show a 10 cm (maximal diameter) piece of the diaphragm looking at the peritoneal surface. The right side of the figure shows the same piece of resected diaphragm from the pleural surface. The defect was closed primarily with 2-0 polydioxanone suture on a taper needle and a post-operative chest tube was not needed</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-8901945x\163d1bfe-2c62-43e7-94e0-c83d8a66d488.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Demographic characteristics</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No diaphragm surgery required</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diaphragm surgery required</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI kg/m<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CA 125 IU/ML</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >709</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >564</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prealbumin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Correlation with diaphragm surgery</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No diaphragm surgery required</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diaphragm surgery required</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p value</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alive at 50 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.2%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-operative effusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-operative effusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chest drainage required</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small bowel resection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon resection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.4%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>value = 0.24 and 0.89, respectively). All 108 patients (100%) were optimally cytoreduced at the end of the primary surgery. Preoperative effusion was identified in 5 (6.8%) patients while postoperative effusion was diagnosed in 68.5% patients. Forty-three (59%) had ascites preoperatively. Seven (9.6%) patients had drains placed postoperatively for treatment of pleural effusions after diaphragm surgery compared to 5.7% not requiring diaphragm surgery.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Primary optimal cytoreduction before chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref3">3</xref>] . The right hemidiaphragm has been shown to be a common site for metastases in the upper abdomen in women with advanced ovarian cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref7">7</xref>] . Upper diaphragmatic surgery has been described in detail [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref8">8</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref13">13</xref>] . It has been shown to be safe and to help improve long-term outcome. This is due to the decreased tumor burden at the end of the case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref14">14</xref>] . Remarkably, however, according to a Society of Gynecologic Oncologists’ survey, 76% of the gynecologic oncologists queried stated that diaphragmatic disease was a barrier to complete cytoreduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref14">14</xref>] . There is increasing evidence that diaphragmatic surgery can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality.</p><p>Pleural effusion is one of the most common postoperative complications after diaphragmatic surgery. Liver mobilization alone appears to be a reason for pleural effusion. Other causes include full thickness diaphragmatic resection, diaphragmatic ablation, and peritoneal peel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref16">16</xref>] . There is still debate whether to place a chest tube before or during surgery to avoid postoperative complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref18">18</xref>] . Tsolakidis et al. stated that patients who had chest tubes placed intraoperatively subjectively felt better due to absence of dyspnea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref19">19</xref>] . The tubes remained in place 5 - 10 days after surgery. Regarding the use of chest tube or thoracentesis in their series, only 1 (3%) patient required chest tube (coagulation group) drainage for 19 days and the other 3 patients (9%) underwent thoracentesis. On the contrary, in the group undergoing more extensive diaphragm procedures, 7 (24%) chest tube drains were required for approximately 11 days (5 - 48), 2 of them for severe pneumothorax, and another 5 (16%) patients needed thoracentesis. Although Chereau et al. and Cliby both recommended the use of prophylactic chest tube placement, they concluded that this approach still needs further evaluation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref19">19</xref>] . The relatively low rate of thoracentesis or pleural effusion drainage (9.5%) concurs with other studies. The rate of pleural effusion is significantly high (40% - 60%) in diaphragmatic surgery patients; however, placing chest tubes on every patient after diaphragmatic surgery would increase the morbidity of the procedure overall. Our study indicates that whether or not a patient undergoes diaphragm surgery, the rate of symptomatic effusion requiring drainage is below 10% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Significantly, patients requiring drainage were over a decade older than those who did not require drainage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Seneff et al. showed that out of 125 thoracenteses performed, 11% had pneumothorax as a major complication of the procedure while 22% had severe pain as a minor complication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref20">20</xref>] . The largest study currently for diaphragmatic surgery (89 patients) by Tsolakidis et al. showed that the incidence of pleural effusion was 52.8% and chest tube in only 13% of patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref14">14</xref>] . In his follow-up study, Tsolakidis showed that less extensive procedures were needed for the diaphragm in women undergoing an interval cytoreduction compared to a primary cytoreduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.46963-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Although the pleural space is always violated in a full thickness resection of the diaphragm, a persistent pneumothorax is not common. This is due to two reasons. First, it is a common surgical technique to drain the pneumothorax with the patient under positive pressure ventilation as the diaphragm is closed. Second, and probably more importantly, there is normally no violation of the lung parenchyma during a diaphragm resection. Therefore, there is not a persistent air leak into the space once the diaphragm is closed. Hence, this is a reason not to place a chest tube.</p><p>Although chest tube placement on patients undergoing diaphragm surgery remains debatable, the literature clearly demonstrates the advantages of complete cytoreduction including diaphragm surgery. With less morbidity associated with diaphragmatic surgery, the authors strongly suggest that all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery should be evaluated and treated for upper abdominal disease. This is evidenced by over 70% of patients surviving alive with a median follow-up of over 50 months. Diaphragm disease should not be a reason that a patient cannot undergo optimal or complete cytoreduction.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.46963-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CHI</surname><given-names> D.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FRANKLIN</surname><given-names> C.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEVINE</surname><given-names> D.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AKSELROD</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SABBATINI</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> JARNAGIN</surname><given-names> W.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DEMATTEO</surname><given-names> R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> POYNOR</surname><given-names> E.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ABURUSTUM</surname><given-names> N.R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BARAKAT</surname><given-names> R.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>IMPROVED OPTIMAL CYTOREDUCTION RATES FOR STAGES IIIC AND IV EPITHELIAL OVARIAN, FALLOPIAN TUBE, AND PRIMARY PERITONEAL CANCER: A CHANGE IN SURGICAL APPROACH</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 94</volume>,<fpage> 650</fpage>-<lpage>654</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2004.01.029</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CHANG</surname><given-names> S.J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BRISTOW</surname><given-names> R.E. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RYU</surname><given-names> H.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>IMPACT OF COMPLETE CYTOREDUCTION LEAVING NO GROSS RESIDUAL DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH RADICAL CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES ON SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 4059</fpage>-<lpage>4067</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1245/S10434-012-2446-8</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EISENKOP, S.M. AND SPIRTOS, N.M. (2001) PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH COMPLETE CYTOREDUCTION OF OVARIAN CANCER: IS THERE A CORRELATION WITH “BIOLOGICAL AGGRESSIVENESS” AND SURVIVAL? GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 82, 435-441.
HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1006/GYNO.2001.6313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ZAPARDIEL</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PEIRETTI</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ZANAGNOLO</surname><given-names> V.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BIFFI</surname><given-names> R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BOCCIOLONE</surname><given-names> L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> L</surname><given-names>ONI</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> F.</surname><given-names> ALETTI</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> G.</surname><given-names> COLOMBO</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> N. </surname><given-names> MAGGIONI</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>DIAPHRAGMATIC SURGERY DURING PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTION FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER: PERITONEAL STRIPPING VERSUS DIAPHRAGMATIC RESECTION</article-title><source> INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER</source><volume> 21</volume>,<fpage> 1698</fpage>-<lpage>1703</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1097/IGC.0B013E31822F65C3</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RAFII, A., STOECKLE, E., JEAN-LAURENT, M., FERRON, G., MORICE, P., HOUVENAEGHEL, G., LECURU, F., LEBLANC, E. AND QUERLEU, D. (2012) MULTI-CENTER EVALUATION OF POST-OPERATIVE MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY AFTER OPTIMAL CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER. PLOS ONE, 7, ARTICLE ID: E39415. HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0039415</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>TAN</surname><given-names> D.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AGARWAL</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KAYE</surname><given-names> S.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>MECHANISMS OF TRANSCOELOMIC METASTASIS IN OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> LANCET ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 925</fpage>-<lpage>934</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70939-1</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GRIFFITHS, C.T. AND FINKLER, N. (1992) SURGERY FOR CARCINOMA OF OVARY: EXTRAPELVIC CYTOREDUCTION. IN: COPPLESON, M., ED., GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2ND EDITION, CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE, LONDON, 1325-1333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CLIBY</surname><given-names> W.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DOWDY</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FEITOZA</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GOSTOUT</surname><given-names> B. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PODRATZ</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>DIAPHRAGM RESECTION FOR OVARIAN CANCER: TECHNIQUE AND SHORT-TERM COMPLICATIONS</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 94</volume>,<fpage> 655</fpage>-<lpage>660</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2004.04.032</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>DOWDY</surname><given-names> S.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LOEWEN</surname><given-names> R.T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ALETTI</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FEITOZA</surname><given-names> S.S. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CLIBY</surname><given-names> W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOMES AND MORBIDITY FOLLOWING DIAPHRAGMATIC PERITONECTOMY FOR WOMEN WITH OVARIAN CARCINOMA</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 109</volume>,<fpage> 303</fpage>-<lpage>307</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2008.02.012</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CHI</surname><given-names> D.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> EISENHAUER</surname><given-names> E.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ZIVANOVIC</surname><given-names> O.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SONODA</surname><given-names> Y.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ABU-RUSTUM</surname><given-names> N.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEVINE</surname><given-names> D.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GUILE</surname><given-names> M.W.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BRISTOW</surname><given-names> R.E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AGHAJANIAN</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BARAKAT</surname><given-names> R.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>IMPROVED PROGRESSION-FREE AND OVERALL SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER AS A RESULT OF A CHANGE IN SURGICAL PARADIGM</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 114</volume>,<fpage> 26</fpage>-<lpage>31</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2009.03.018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SILVER</surname><given-names> D.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>FULL-THICKNESS DIAPHRAGMATIC RESECTION WITH SIMPLE AND SECURE CLOSURE TO ACCOMPLISH COMPLETE CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 95</volume>,<fpage> 384</fpage>-<lpage>387</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2004.07.046</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>EISENHAUER</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ABU-RUSTUM</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SONODA</surname><given-names> Y.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEVINE</surname><given-names> D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> POYNOR</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AGHAJANIAN</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>THE ADDITION OF EXTENSIVE UPPER ABDOMINAL SURGERY TO ACHIEVE OPTIMAL CYTOREDUCTION IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH STAGES IIIC-IV EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 103</volume>,<fpage> 1083</fpage>-<lpage>1090</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2006.06.028</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>MONTZ</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SCHLAERTH</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BEREK</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>RESECTION OF DIAPHRAGMATIC PERITONEUM AND MUSCLE: ROLE IN CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY OF OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 338</fpage>-<lpage>340</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90074-7</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>TSOLAKIDIS</surname><given-names> D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AMANT</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> VAN GORP</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEUNEN</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NEVEN</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> VERGOTE</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>DIAPHRAGMATIC SURGERY DURING PRIMARY DEBULKING IN 89 PATIENTS WITH STAGE IIIB-IV EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 116</volume>,<fpage> 489</fpage>-<lpage>496</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2009.07.014</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>FANFANI</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FAGOTTI</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GALLOTTA</surname><given-names> V.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ERCOLI</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PACELLI</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> COSTANTINI</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> VIZZIELLI</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MARGARITI</surname><given-names> P.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GARGANESE</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SCAMBIA</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>UPPER ABDOMINAL SURGERY IN ADVANCED AND RECURRENT OVARIAN CANCER: ROLE OF DIAPHRAGMATIC SURGERY</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 116</volume>,<fpage> 497</fpage>-<lpage>501</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2009.11.023</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>EISENHAUER</surname><given-names> E.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> D’ANGELICA</surname><given-names> M.I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ABU-RUSTUM</surname><given-names> N.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SONODA</surname><given-names> Y.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> JARNAGIN</surname><given-names> W.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BARAKAT</surname><given-names> R.R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CHI</surname><given-names> D.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>INCIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF PLEURAL EFFUSIONS AFTER DIAPHRAGM PERITONECTOMY OR RESECTION FOR ADVANCED MULLERIAN CANCER</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 103</volume>,<fpage> 871</fpage>-<lpage>877</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2006.05.023</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ALETTI</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DOWDY</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PODRATZ</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CLIBY</surname><given-names> W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DIAPHRAGM DISEASE CORRELATES WITH IMPROVED SURVIVAL IN OPTIMALLY DEBULKED ADVANCED STAGE OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY</source><volume> 100</volume>,<fpage> 283</fpage>-<lpage>287</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2005.08.027</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>VERGOTE</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MARQUETTE</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AMANT</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BARTELOOT</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NEVEN</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>PORT-SITE METASTASES AFTER OPEN LAPAROSCOPY: A STUDY IN 173 PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED OVARIAN CARCINOMA</article-title><source> INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 776</fpage>-<lpage>779</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1111/J.1525-1438.2005.00135.X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CHEREAU</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BALLESTER</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SELLE</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CORTEZ</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> POMEL</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DARAI</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>PULMONARY MORBIDITY OF DIAPHRAGMATIC SURGERY FOR STAGE III/IV OVARIAN CANCER</article-title><source> BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY</source><volume> 116</volume>,<fpage> 1062</fpage>-<lpage>1068</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1111/J.1471-0528.2009.02214.X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SENEFF</surname><given-names> M.G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CORWIN</surname><given-names> R.W.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GOLD</surname><given-names> L.H. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> IRWIN</surname><given-names> R.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1986</year>)<article-title>COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THORACOCENTESIS</article-title><source> CHEST</source><volume> 90</volume>,<fpage> 97</fpage>-<lpage>100</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1378/CHEST.90.1.97</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.46963-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>TSOLAKIDIS</surname><given-names> D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AMANT</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEUNEN</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CADRON</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NEVEN</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> VERGOTE</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>COMPARISON OF DIAPHRAGMATIC SURGERY AT PRIMARY OR INTERVAL DEBULKING IN ADVANCED OVARIAN CARCINOMA: AN ANALYSIS OF 163 PATIENTS</article-title><source> EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER</source><volume> 47</volume>,<fpage> 191</fpage>-<lpage>198</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.EJCA.2010.08.020</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>