<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JACEN</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2325-7458</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jacen.2014.34019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JACEN-51529</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Insecticidal Effects of the Annonaceous Acetogenin Squamocin and the Acetogenin Fraction of Seeds of &lt;i&gt;Rollinia occidentalis&lt;/i&gt; on Soybean and Corn Pests
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>iego</surname><given-names>Tolosa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Ruiz Hidalgo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pedro</surname><given-names>Eugenio Sal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Susana</surname><given-names>Popich</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alicia</surname><given-names>Bardón</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adriana</surname><given-names>Neske</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>INQUINOA-CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Universidad Nacional de Chilecito, Chilecito, Argentina</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Instituto de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán,
Ayacucho, Argentina</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>aneske@fbqf.unt.edu.ar(AN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>09</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>156</fpage><lpage>160</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A treatment based on the acetogenin fraction of the methanol extract of 
  Rollinia occidentalis seeds was applied to soybean crops for three consecutive years. In relation to the control population, the treatment reduced the population of 
  Anticarsia gemmatalis, Rachiplusia nu, Pseudoplusia includens, Loxostege bifidalis and Spodoptera frugiperda to 52% and 65% after 48 h of application at concentrations of 500 and 750 μg/mL respectively, while low toxic effects were detected on natural enemies. The extract treatment at 500 μg/mL and a solution of the annonaceous acetogenin, squamocin, at 50 and 100 μg/mL, were also applied to a corn field to produce 75%, 93% and 100% mortality rates on the population of S. &lt;i&gt;frugiperda&lt;/i&gt;, respectively, after 72 h of application. In addition, damages caused by lepidopterans in treated crops were lower than those observed in non treated fields, evaluated by residual biomass. This statement is based on data from trials with the commercially available insecticides lufenuron and cypermethrin.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Annonaceous Acetogenins</kwd><kwd> Polyphagous Lepidopteran</kwd><kwd> Soybean Crops</kwd><kwd> Corn Crops</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Spodoptera frugiperda&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Insecticidal and toxic effects of annonaceous acetogenins (ACG) isolated from several Annonaceae family members, have been reported on several insect species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref8">8</xref>] . Natural products with insecticidal activity are an interesting alternative for pest control because they biodegrade rapidly and are beneficial for both man and environment.</p><p>Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is a polyphagous lepidopteran commonly called fall armyworm, a major pest in corn fields where it feeds on leaves, tassels and ears of corn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref11">11</xref>] . It has become one of the most serious problems for corn crops in tropical and subtropical regions of Latin America for the important damages it produces. S. frugiperda displays a very wide host range with over 80 plants recorded, though grasses are preferred. Severe damages are particularly caused during its last two larval stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>A previous publication, informed that the methanol extract of Rollinia occidentalis R.E. Fr. seeds collected in Tucum&#225;n (Argentina), incorporated to the larval diet at 100 and 250 &#181;g/g displayed toxic effects on S. frugiperda. On the other hand, five pure acetogenins isolated from the mentioned plant collection, sylvaticin, rolliniastatin-1, rolliniastatin-2, motrilin and desacetyluvaricin, produced nutritional alterations and mortality close to 90% on early larval instars of S. frugiperda at 50 and 100 &#181;g per g of diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>New control methods are necessary for crop pest management programs due to the widespread problems of insecticide-resistant populations and the increasing consumer concern regarding pesticide residues in food products. Thus, this study evaluated the bioactivity of the annonaceous acetogenin, squamocin, isolated from Annona cherimolia (Annonaceae) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref17">17</xref>] , and the acetogenin fraction of the methanol extract of R. occidentalis seeds against S. frugiperda, which is a primary insect pest of corn.</p><p>Particularly the seeds, are a promising source of ACG that can be used as a prototype model and/or a biorational insecticide for the control of S. frugiperda. The commercial insecticides lufenuron (LUF) and cypermetrin (CYP) at 250 &#181;g/mL were used as positive controls. This is the first report on the treatments mentioned on soybean and corn pests in a field assay.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>Plant material: R. occidentalis fruits were collected in Tucum&#225;n, Argentina, in March 2005. A voucher sample (No. 604639) was deposited at the Herbarium of Instituto Lillo of Tucum&#225;n.</p><p>A. cherimolia fruits were collected in January 2008, in Tucum&#225;n, Argentina. A voucher specimen (LIL 515092) was deposited at the Herbarium of Instituto Lillo of Tucum&#225;n.</p><p>Acetogenin extraction and purification: The dried and powdered seeds of A. cherimolia and R. occidentalis were macerated with methanol. The methanolic extracts were evaporated and the residue partitioned in a mixture of CHCl<sub>3</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>O (1:1). The subextracts in chloroform and H<sub>2</sub>O were obtained by vacuum evaporation. The chloroformic subextract was partitioned with a mixture of hexane/methanol (1:1). Squamocin was isolated from A. cherimolia methanolic subextract after treatment with semipreparative RP-HPLC with MeOH/H<sub>2</sub>O (80:20). The characterization was assessed by spectroscopic techniques (IR, <sup>1</sup>H-NMR, <sup>13</sup>C-NMR, and MS) as well as α<sub>D</sub> determination, in comparison with previously reported data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51529-ref5">5</xref>] . Acetogenins represent around 0.07% of the seed weight. The acetogenin fraction of the R. occidentalis methanol seed extract was selected for the present study.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Treatment Formulations</title><p>Test solution. The acetogenin fractions of the R. occidentalis methanol seed extract were prepared at 42.5, 125, 250, 500 and 750 &#181;g/mL with destilled water and polysorbate 80 as nonionic surfactant. The pure acetogenin solutions were prepared at 50 and 100 &#181;g/mL under the same conditions.</p><p>Test products. Lufenuron and Cypermethrin were applied in this study. The first one is a registered trademark of Syngenta Agro S.A. The formulation in Cypermethrin, the active ingredient of several commercial products available in the crop protection market, is produced by Chemotecnica, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Both test solutions contained 250 &#181;g/mL of destilled water. These solutions served as toxic reference treatments and destilled water served as benign control treatment.</p><p>Test plants. Ten Zea mays L. seeds were individually placed in their seed-holes. After germination, seedlings were removed and carried to separate test cages. The pots were then connected to a drip irrigation system, ensuring a regular water supply. During their development the plants were not treated with protection products.</p><p>Field assay. It was conducted in a 0.5 ha experimental plot divided into 12 microplots of 10.0 &#215; 2.5 m, leaving a 5.0 m bordure on each side. We evaluated the insecticidal effect of R. occidentalis methanol seed extract at five different doses (42.5, 125, 250, 500 and 750 μg/mL). We compared the performance of insecticidal effects of the extract with two commonly used insecticides in soybean pest control: LUF and CYP and left an untreated patch as control. Each treatment had 3 replicates grouped in a randomized block design in two rows with their respective controls. The plots were hand sprayed with the products from a 20 liter portable pack. The number of arthropods found on a 1 m long strip of cloth extended between rows after severe shaking was recorded. Each plot was swept 30 times. This treatment was repeated before and after 48 h of the applications. The treatment was applied to soybean crops for three consecutive years.</p><p>Semi-field assay. A semi-field approach was devised to test ACG effects against S. frugiperda second instar larvae that were individually enclosed in 10 seedlings placed in 0.25 m<sup>2 </sup>meshed cages completely isolated from any other insects. The assays were performed in triplicate for each dose of all products tested. After 24 h, each cage was sprayed with ACG at 50 and 100 &#181;g/mL, respectively, as well as with the commercial insecticide, LUF at 250 &#181;g/mL. Mortality was evaluated in each cage at 24, 48 and 72 h after fumigation.</p><p>After 10 days each seedling was cut and wrapped in labelled papers in a stove at 50˚C for 48 h. The damage caused by S. frugiperda feeding was estimated by determining the percentage of leaves that were damaged or punctured in each sample through the visual evaluation of each plant. Subsequently, leaf weight loss (%) was estimated based on the residual biomass (g).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Results are reported as Mean &#177; SD. Differences in the mean values were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Tukey test was used for all pair wise multiple comparisons of groups. In all statistical analysis P values &gt; 0.05 were considered not significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Toxicity of R. occidentalis methanol seed extract on soybean pests in field assays: The results obtained from the three field assays on soybean, showed that treatment with the R. occidentalis extract at 500 y 750 &#181;g/mL reduced Lepidoptera population 52% and 65% respectively after 48 h of application when compared with the control population. The treatment with LUF and CYP decreased Lepidoptera population 61% and 63%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The extracts displayed low toxic effects on natural enemy populations (spiders, Coleoptera, Pentatomidae and beetles). The results in all plots sprayed with the extract were similar to those treated with the commercially available insecticides (50%), while pest population control was 100%. The phytophagous lepidopterans Anticarsia gemmatalis, Rachiplusia nu, Pseduplusia includens, Loxostege bifidalis, Spodoptera frugiperda and S. cosmioides were found in the field, as well as the natural predators, Nabis capsiformis (Nabiidae) and Podisus connexivus (Pentatomidae), commonly present in soybean crops. The results obtained with the toxic referent products LUF and CYP (at 125 and 70 g a.i./l, respectively) showed that larval mortality was high enough to be statiscally significant.</p><p>Toxicity of R. occidentalis methanol seed extract and squamocin on S. frugiperda in corn Semi-field assay: We describe a semi-field cage test specifically designed to test effects of plant protection products on S. frugiperda. We evaluated the insecticidal activity of R. occidentalis methanol seed extract (acetogenin fraction) and bis-THF ACG, squamocin on S. frugiperda. Also, we studied the damage caused by the lepidopteran in treated and control crops, quantifying the residual biomass (g).</p><p>The acetogenin fraction of R. occidentalis methanol seed extract (500 &#181;g/mL) and squamocin (50 and 100 &#181;g/mL) produced a mortality of 75%, 93% and 100% in the population of S. frugiperda after 72 h of treatment while LUF produced a 100% mortality (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Note the importance of natural products that exert their toxicity in early instar larvae, when so much damage has not been produced yet.</p><p>The damage caused by lepidopterans in treated and control crops was quantified by evaluating the residual biomass after treatment with R. occidentalis (500 mg/ml), squamocin (50 y 100 mg/ml) and LUF as positive control (250 mg/ml). The results were 0.42, 0.46, 0.60 and 0.80 g, respectively and 0.22 g for the control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>The test proved to be useful to evaluate the effects of the plant protection products sprayed on the crops.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage of arthropod populations after 48 h of application</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compounds</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conc. &#181;g/mL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> Field test<sup>a</sup> 48 h</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> Field test<sup>a</sup> 48 h</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd </sup>Field test<sup>a</sup> 48 h</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ex. R.o.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.0 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ex. R.o.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.0 &#177; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.0 &#177;1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ex. R.o.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.1 &#177; 2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.1 &#177; 3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.1 &#177; 3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ex. R.o.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.7 &#177; 3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.0 &#177; 3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ex. R.o.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.0 &#177; 3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LUF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.1 &#177; 4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.5 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.0 &#177; 3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0 &#177; 4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0 &#177; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.0 &#177; 3.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>(%) arthropod population after 48 h with respect to control. ND: Not determined.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Larval mortality of S. frugiperda and residual biomass in a semi-field approach (10 seedlings)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Extract R.o. (500 &#181;g/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Squamocin (50 &#181;g/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Squamocin (100 &#181;g/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LUF (250 &#181;g/mL)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Larval mortality (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residual biomass (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80 &#177; 0.13</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The idea of the trial was to prepare groups of test plants to evaluate the action of different products 24 h after placing the larvae. A group remained untreated for control. The relatively small size of the test units and the high degree of standardization achieved with the set-up made the test highly reproducible in a test design with various replicates per treatment (three in our trial). Mortality was assessed on a daily basis throughout the experiment. All dead lepidopterans were counted and removed. Overall conditions during the bioassay period were very good. Temperature averaged 25˚C (from 20˚C at night to 27˚C in the daytime) with almost no rain and a lot of sunshine. The plants inside the cages were connected to a drip irrigation system, so that watering of the plants occurred with minimal lepidopteran disturbance.</p><p>Mortality effects were analyzed by comparing the number of dead lepidopterans found in the different treatment groups. As illustrated by the data presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, differences among treatment groups were observed immediately after the exposure was initiated. Mortality levels in the toxic reference cages remained high and statistically significant throughout the trial period.</p><p>The results obtained in corn semi-field and soybean field tests with formulations containing acetogenins were promising to control lepidopteran pests. Given the problems of environmental pollution by the use of highly toxic synthetic chemicals, it is necessary to find new ecologically friendly alternatives for insect control. Treatment with R. occidentalis acetogenin fraction is environmentally selective and shows an excellent degree of selectivity towards beneficial insects minimizing the detrimental effects of pesticides on natural enemies, allowing their survival and sustainable control of pests.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by grants from the Agencia Nacional de Promoci&#243;n Cient&#237;fica y Tecnol&#243;gica (ANPCyT), Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad Nacional de Tucum&#225;n (CIUNT) and Concejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient&#237;ficas y T&#233;cnicas (CONICET), Rep&#250;blica Argentina. Assays were carried out at Eugenio Sal’s field on Route 323, Tucum&#225;n, Argentina. Authors are especially grateful to him.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.51529-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Alkofahi, A., Rupprecht, J.K., Anderson, J.E., McLaughlin, J.L., Mikolajczak, K. and Scout, B. (1989) Search for New Pesticides from Higher Plants. In: Arnason, J.T., Philogene, B. and Morand, A., Eds., Insecticides of Plant Origin, ACS, Washington DC, 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-1989-0387.ch003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alali, F., Liu, X. and Mc Laughlin, J.L. (1999) Annonaceous Acetogenins: Recent Progress. Journal of Natural Products, 62, 504-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np980406d</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guada&amp;#241o, A., Gutiérrez, C., de La Pe&amp;#241a, E., Cortes, D. and González-Coloma, A. (2000) Insecticidal and Mutagenic Evaluation of Two Annonaceous Acetogenins. Journal of Natural Products, 63, 773-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np990328+</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hincapié Llanos, C.A., Lopera Arango, D. and Ceballos Giraldo, M. (2008) Insecticidal Activity of Annona muricata (Annonaceae) Seed Extracts on Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 34, 76-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">álvarez Colom, O., Neske, A., Popich, S. and Bardón, A. (2007) Toxic Effects of Annonaceous Acetogenins from Annona cherimolia (Magnoliales: Annonaceae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Pest Science, 80, 63-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-006-0149-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">álvarez Colom, O., Barrachina, I., Ayala Mingol, I., González Mas, M.C., Moya Sanz, P., Neske, A. and Bardón, A. (2008) Toxic Effects of Annonaceous Acetogenins on Oncopeltus fasciatus. Journal of Pest Science, 81, 85-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-007-0189-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">álvarez Colom, O., Salvatore, A., Willink, E., Ordó&amp;#241ez, R., Isla, M.I., Neske, A. and Bardón, A. (2010) Insecticidal, Mutagenic and Genotoxic Evaluation of Annonaceous Acetogenins. Natural Product Communications, 5, 391-394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Di Toto Blessing, L., álvarez Colom, O., Popich, S., Neske, A. and Bardón, A. (2010) Antifeedant and Toxic Effects of Acetogenins from Annona montana on Spodoptera frugiperda. Journal of Pest Science, 83, 307-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-010-0299-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marenco, R.J., Foster, R.E. and Sanchez, C.A. (1992) Sweet Corn Response to Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Damage during Vegetative Growth. Journal of Economic Entomology, 85, 1285-1292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, H. and Mihn, J.A. (2002) Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Southwestern Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Sugarcane Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Damage and Grain Yield of Four Maize Hybrids in Relation to Four Tillage Systems. Crop Protection, 21, 121-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00071-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Clavijo, S. and Pérez Greiner, G. (2000) Protección y sanidad vegetal (capítulo 6), Insectos plagas del maíz (sección 2). In: Fontana Nieves, H. and González Narváez, C., Eds., Fundación Polar, Caracas, 345-361.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Murillo, A. (1991) Distribución, importancia y manejo del complejo Spodoptera en Colombia. Memorias Seminario Spodoptera frugiperda (El gusano cogollero) en sorgo, maíz y otros cultivos. In: Zuluaga, J.L. and Mu&amp;#241oz, G., Eds., Calí, Colombia, 15-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sparks, A.N. (1979) A Review of the Biology of the Fall Armyworm. Florida Entomologist, 62, 82-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3494083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murúa, M.G., Virla, E.G. and Defagó, V. (2003) Evaluación de cuatro dietas artificiales para la cría de Spodoptera frugiperda (Lep.: Noctuidae) destinada a mantener poblaciones experimentales de himenópteros parasitoides. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal de Plagas, 29, 43-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murúa, M.G. and Virla, E. (2004) Population Parameters of Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae) Fed on Corn and Two Predominant Grasess in Tucumán (Argentina). Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 20, 199-210.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolosa, D., álvarez Colom, O., Bardón, A. and Neske, A. (2012) Insecticidal Effects of Annonaceous Acetogenins from Rollinia occidentalis Seeds Extract on Spodoptera frugiperda. Natural Product Communications, 7, 1645-1646.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51529-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kawasu, K., Alcántara, J. and Kobayashi, A. (1989) Isolation and Structure of Neoannonin, a Novel Insecticidal Compound from the Seeds of Annona squamosa. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 53, 2719-2722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.53.2719</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>