<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Clinical Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-284X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijcm.2014.517136</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJCM-49528</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Update of Aetiological Patterns of Adult Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Accra, Ghana
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>amuel</surname><given-names>Essoun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jonathan</surname><given-names>C. B. Dakubo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Surgery, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Surgery, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>essoun@gmail.com(AE)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>09</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>17</issue><fpage>1059</fpage><lpage>1064</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: The aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction globally has evolved from benign to malignant causes, but there seem to be no recent data on the trends in Ghana. The aim was, therefore, to identify the current patterns in the aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction in the adult population in Ghana. Methodology: This was a retrospective review of all confirmed cases of gastric outlet obstruction in the last decade, spanning from June 2004 to May 2014, that were managed at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. Results: A total of 107 patients were managed for gastric outlet obstruction with a male to female ratio of 2.15:1 and most of the patients making 71.3% of cases belonged to the age range of 40 to 60 years. The predominant aetiology for gastric outlet obstruction was found to be gastric cancer (55.140%), followed by peptic ulcer disease (27.103%). Conclusion: The aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction in Ghana has evolved from benign to malignant causes, following current global trends. Gastric cancer is now the most important cause of gastric outlet obstruction in Ghana, followed by peptic ulcer disease which predominates as the commonest benign cause.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gastric Outlet Obstruction</kwd><kwd> Aetiological Trends</kwd><kwd> Gastric Cancer</kwd><kwd> Peptic Ulcer Disease</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Background</title><p>Gastric outlet obstruction is a clinical and pathophysiological manifestation of a mechanical impediment to the flow of gastric content at the pyloro-duodenal channel which may be complete or partial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref2">2</xref>] and often results in significant fluid, electrolytes, acid-base and nutritional deficits as well as weight loss. The varying aetiology can be either benign or malignant, but the mechanism of obstruction may include acute edema, chronic cicatarization and fibrosis, an obstructing mass or an extrinsic compression at the pyloro-duodenal channel.</p><p>The aetiological patterns of gastric outlet obstruction are changing globally. The most frequent cause has changed with the discovery and effective treatment of Helicobacter pylori, a proven cause of peptic ulcer disease. Prior to the 1970s, benign disease was responsible for the majority of cases of gastric outlet obstruction in adults, while malignancies accounted for only 10 to 39 percent of cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref4">4</xref>] . However, recent data from elsewhere suggests malignancies causing 50% to 80% cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref3">3</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref6">6</xref>] . In 1972, Badoe reported that chronic duodenal was the predominant cause of gastric outlet obstruction in the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Although some reports suggest peripancreatic cancers as the most common malignant etiology with a frequency of 15% - 20% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref8">8</xref>] , several other reports suggest gastric cancers are the most frequent cause of gastric outlet obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>There is no current data on the aetiological patterns of gastric outlet obstruction in Ghana. The rationale of this review is therefore to document what pertains in the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana almost four decades since the last documented aetiological trends for gastric outlet obstruction.</p><p>Aim: To identify the current patterns in the aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction in the adult population in Ghana.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>This is a retrospective review of patients with confirmed gastric outlet obstruction seen and managed in the Department of Surgery of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital over the last decade. The period under review is from June 2004 to May 2014.</p><p>The data for the study was obtained from the case logs in the operating theatres and also the admissions and discharges logs on the four general surgical units of the department. Key data obtained include the age, sex, the primary cause of gastric outlet obstruction and the treatment offered the patient. The data obtained was analyzed and the key results compared to patterns previously reported in the same hospital and in other countries.</p><p>Study centre: The review was carried out in the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, a tertiary hospital which is located in the South-western part of Accra, which is the capital city of Ghana in West Africa. The hospital is the major referring centre in Ghana and receives patients from all over the country as well as patients from neighboring West African countries.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During the period from January 2004 to July 2014, a total of 107 adult patients were diagnosed and managed for gastric outlet obstruction in the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. The patients’ ages ranged from 14 to 92 years. The overall modal age group was 60 - 69, although cumulatively 76 patients (71.03% of the cases) were within the ages of 40 to 69 years. However the age distribution by sex reveals a modal age group of 60 - 69 years for males and 40 - 49 for females.</p><p>Overall, most of the gastric outlet obstruction was caused by malignancies making up 72.897% of all cases while benign diseases were responsible for 27.103%. The aetiologies included gastric carcinoma (55.14%), peptic ulcer disease (25.234%), pancreatic head carcinoma (13.084%) and miscellaneous causes (6.542%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> show the distribution across the different age groups. The miscellaneous causes included primary duodenal tumor, proximal jejunal tumor, adhesions involving the duodenum, and abdominal tuberculosis involving the duodenum.</p><p>The sex distribution showed a male preponderance for gastric outlet obstruction across all the various causes with males representing 68.224% of cases and females, 31.776% of cases as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. With regards to the individual aetiologies and their respective sex distribution, of the patients with gastric cancer 76.271% were males as against 23.729% females. Among those who had peptic ulcer disease, 62.963% were males compared to 37.037% being females. The male to female sex ratio of those who had pancreatic cancer was 57.143% male to 42.857% females and the ratio for the other miscellaneous causes was 42.857% males to 57.143% females.</p><p>Beyond age 30 years, gastric cancers assume importance as the predominant cause of gastric outlet obstruction in the various age groups. The proportions of affected patients are predominantly males in the respective age groups. However, there seem to be an almost equal proportion in the sex distribution with peptic ulcer dis- ease across the corresponding age groups.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastric Cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peptic Ulcer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pancreatic Cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Miscellaneous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.935%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.869%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (11.215%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (23.365%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (18.692%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (28.972%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (9.346%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 - 89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (4.673%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.935%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (55.14%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (25.234%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (13.084%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (6.542%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (100.002%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sex ratio</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sex</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 - 89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (31.776%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (68.224%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (100.00%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of the aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2100916x5.png"/></fig><p>The annual trends in the period under review showed a steadily high proportion of cases of gastric outlet obstruction caused by gastric cancer followed by peptic ulcer with a smaller proportion attributable to pancreatic cancer and other minor causes as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Comparing the trends over a 5 year period suggested a change in aetiology from peptic ulcer disease in the period between 1967 and 1971 to gastric cancer in the periods of 2004 to 2009 and 2010 to 2014. Whereas peptic ulcer disease formed 71.429% of all causes of gastric outlet obstruction in the period 1967 to 1971, it formed 26.471% (2004 to 2009) and 24.658% (2010 to 2014). There is also an increase in the proportion of patients with gastric cancer aetiology from 23.81% (1967-1971) to 55.882% (2004-2009) and 54.795% (2010-2014). The absolute figures are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> below.</p><p>A total of 90 patients (84.112%) had operative treatment for gastric outlet obstruction with a cumulative 36.667% being gastro-jejunostomy, 28.889% were partial gastrectomy, 20% were truncal vagotomy and 14.444% being triple bypass (cholecysto-jejunostomy, jejuno-jejunostomy and gastro-jejunostomy) due to associated obstructive jaundice (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Two patients (1.869%) were however managed conservatively for acute edema from a pre-pyloric ulcer and the symptoms resolved and 15 patients (14.019%) had advanced cancer and were never optimized enough for operative intervention.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Annual trends (GC-gastric cancer; PUD-peptic ulcer disease; PC-pancreatic cancer; Misc- miscellaneous)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2100916x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> 5 year trends (GC-gastric cancer; PUD-peptic ulcer disease; PC-pancreatic cancer; Misc- miscellaneous)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2100916x7.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> 5 year trends (GC-gastric cancer; PUD-peptic ulcer disease; PC-pancreatic cancer; Misc- miscellaneous)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PUD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Misc</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1967-1971 Badoe (1972)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2004-2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010-2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of operative procedures done</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Procedure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastrojejunostomy for Gastric Cancers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastrojejunostomy for Duodenal and lesions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.667</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial Gastrectomy for Peptic Ulcer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.778</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial Gastrectomy for Gastric cancers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.111</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Truncal Vagotomy with Gastrojejunostomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Triple Bypass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.444</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Gastric outlet obstruction has evolved in aetiology over the past few decades. The predominant cause was hitherto peptic ulcer disease as has been widely reported in various English language literature both locally and in the west. Prior to the 1970s, benign disease represented by peptic ulcer disease was responsible for the majority of adult cases while malignant disease accounted for only 10 to 39 percent of cases of gastric outlet obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref4">4</xref>] . In 1972, Badoe found chronic duodenal ulcer representing 67% of cases (and pre-pyloric gastric ulcer- 5%) as the predominant cause of gastric outlet obstruction in the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref7">7</xref>] . This report has been and remains the only local report on aetiological trends of this condition.</p><p>With an improved understanding of the aetio-pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease and the discovery of Helicobacter pylori which is implicated in the pathogenesis, the advent of effective eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection can give long-term ulcer remission, reduce recurrence, prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding and may aid resolution of pyloro-duodenal stenosis in some cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref11">11</xref>] . It is even suggested that Helicobacter pylori eradication may improve the resolution in obstructive ulcer cases with colonization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>In this review, a total of 107 patients with gastric outlet obstruction were diagnosed and offered various treatments. The ages ranged between 14 to 92 years with an overall modal age group of 60 to 69 years although 71.03% of the patients were in the age range of 40 to 69 years old. This shows a demographic-age phenomenon with 20.6% of Ghana’s population currently older than 40 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref13">13</xref>] . This is the age bracket associated with increased incidence of cancers in general.</p><p>The age and sex modal distribution was 60 to 69 years for males and 40 to 49 for females. Most of the patients belong to the 40 to 69 age group and made up 70.97% of all females and 69.84% of male patients. The exact reason for this observation is not clear.</p><p>Overall, this study shows that males are more affected than females in a ratio of approximately 2:1. These demographics compare to what has been reported where most of the patients are in the fifth and sixth decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref4">4</xref>] . This however was at variance with a review in Tanzania where most of the patients were in the fourth decade [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref9">9</xref>] . The reasons for the male preponderance may be attributable to the higher incidence of gastric cancers in the male population hence the presence of a distal advanced gastric cancer is likely to obstruct the pyloric channel.</p><p>Most of the patients had malignant cause of the obstruction making up about three-fourths of all causes of gastric outlet obstruction with gastric cancer being the predominant malignant cause and peptic ulcer disease the predominant benign cause. This compares to what is reported in several regional reviews [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The total number of cases attributable to peri-pancreatic cancer was however very low in comparison to gastric cancers. The reasons for these low proportions cannot be explained. This picture does not support the suggestion that peri-pancreatic cancer is the most important malignant aetiology for gastric outlet obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.49528-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>It was observed in our study that over 44.444% of our patients with malignant disease had a palliative bypass rather than curative resections because they often presented late with advanced disease and 14.019% of patients could not have the benefit of operative intervention due to poor clinical state.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitations</title><p>Since the study is a retrospective one, and the data obtained from the operating room log book and the admissions and discharges logs from the surgical wards, details regarding the presenting symptoms were not captured in the study. However, in the follow up prospective study on this subject, details of the clinical presentation, endoscopic features, the exact type of surgical treatment, the long-term disease related morbidity or surgery related morbidity and the quality of life of individual patients will be evaluated.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The aetiology of gastric outlet obstruction in Ghana has evolved from benign to malignant causes following current global trends. Gastric cancer is now the most important cause, followed by peptic ulcer disease which predominates as the commonest benign cause.</p><p>The results from the review emphasize the need for accurate data collection on gastric outlet obstruction and enhance the need for a prospective study on this subject. With gastric cancers becoming prominent, there is an urgent need for a study into the epidemiology, aetiology and risk factors for gastric cancers in Ghana, while public health education and early diagnosis cannot be overemphasized.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.49528-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tendler, D.A. (2002) Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Bridging Another Divide. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 97, 4-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05391.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samad, A, Whanzada, T.W. and Shoukat, I. (2007) Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Change in Etiology. Pakistan Journal of Surgery, 23, 29-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, C.D. (1995) Gastric Outlet Obstruction-Malignant until Proven Otherwise. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 90, 1740.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shone, D.N., Nikoomanesh, P., Smith-Meek, M.M. and Bender, J.S. (1995) Malignancy Is the Most Common Cause Of Gastric Outlet Obstruction in the Era of H2 Blockers. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 90, 1769-1770.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, C.D. and Ellis, H. (1990) Gastric Outlet Obstruction Now Predicts Malignancy. British Journal of Surgery, 77, 1023-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770923</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chowdhury, A., Dhali, G.K. and Banerjee, P.K. (1996) Etiology of Gastric Outlet Obstruction. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 91, 1679.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Badoe</surname><given-names> E.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1972</year>)<article-title>Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Adults—Ktrle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra</article-title><source> The West African Medical Journal and Nigerian Medical &amp; Dental Practitioner</source><volume> 21</volume>,<fpage> 154</fpage>-<lpage>158</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sohn, T.A., Lillemoe, K.D. and Cameron, J.L. (1999) Surgical Palliation of Unresectable Periampullary Adenocarcinoma in the 1990s. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 188, 658-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00049-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Misra, S.P., Dwivedi, M. and Misra, V. (1998) Malignancy Is the Most Common Cause of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Even in a Developing Country. Endoscopy, 30, 484-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1001313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaka, H., Mchembe, M.D., Rambau, P.F. and Chalya, P.L. (2013) Gastric Outlet Obstruction at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania: A Prospective Review of 184 Cases. BMC Surgery, 13, 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ostrow, B. (2007) Peptic Ulcer Disease—The Impact of Helicobacter pylori on Management in the Developing World. Surgery in Africa Monthly Review (SIA), No. 9, April 2007 Edition.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taskin, V., Gurer, I., Ozyilkan, E., Sare, M. and Hilmioglu, F. (2000) Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Peptic Ulcer Disease Complicated with Outlet Obstruction. Helicobacter, 5, 38-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5378.2000.00005.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.49528-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) (2012) 2010 Population and Housing Census, Summary Report of Final Results.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>