The thermoplastic polymer PP, used as matrix material, was supplied by the Primepolymer (Japan). It had specific gravity of 0.90 - 0.91, melting temperatures of 165˚C - 171˚C and crystallinity of 82%. Kenaf fiber was treated by alkali solution which 3 wt% of NaOH solution during 2 hours at room temperature. Raw bamboo fiber obtained from bamboo which boiled with alkali solution, so bamboo fiber did not additional alkali treatement. Fibers were washed with fluid water to remove impurities, such as; dust, fiber powder and NaOH on fiber surface. Then it was dried with fan over 2 days.

In this study two kinds of materials were used for resin impregnation method. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) impregnation method was used on PVA produced by NACALAI TESQUE.INC (Japan). PVA solution was made with stirrer and 80˚C water based 3% solution mixed over 24 hour period. It was to immerse natural fibers for two hours at room temperature. The Phenol resin treatment uses a 9% ethanol based solution. The component of the mix has used a homogenizer for 15 minutes. It was to immerse natural fibers for two hours at room temperature. Raw kenaf fiber (UK), Alkali treatment kenaf fiber (NK), phenol resin impregnated kenaf fiber (PHK), PVA impregnated kenaf fiber (PVK) Raw bamboo fiber (UB), phenol resin impregnated bamboo fiber (PHB), PVA impregnated bamboo fiber (PVB) were used for testing and manufacturing. Resin impregnated fiber was dried with fan over 2 days.

The composite specimens were prepared by using an injection molding machine. Before using injection molding machine, fiber and matrix were mixed in twin extruder twice. This happens inside the blocks which are heated at 170˚C. Both materials are added to the machine at the same time with a weight ratio of 3:10 (natural fiber: PP). The mold used to produce specimens are prepared according to the Japanese Industrial Standard, specifically the JIS K 7139 standard. The tensile, flexural and water absorption tests were conducted [11] [12] . For each test and type of composites were tested and the average values are reported. For tensile and bending tests, 15 and 10 specimens were used for each test and were conducted with a cross head speed of 2 mm/min at the average room temperature of 25˚C. Water absorption test used 5 specimens for each case and it followed the standard of room temperature. Before the test, specimens were dried in the oven at 70˚C for 24 hours. After the dehydration, specimens were sodden into the water. Total of 4 times (0.5, 4, 24, 48 hours after), sodden specimens were taken out from water and measure weight of specimens. Before they were put on scale, specimens were cleaned by paper towels.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provides an excellent examination of the surface morphology of untreated and treated kenaf fibers. It is expected that the surface morphology of untreated fiber will be different to that of treated fiber particularly in terms of their level of smoothness and roughness. Therefore studies of the fiber surface topography could provide vital information on the level of interfacial adhesion that would exist between the fiber and the matrix, when used as reinforcement fiber with and without treatment. All micrographs in this work are taken with 1000 times (1000×) magnification. Figure 1 shows the SEM micrograph of an untreated kenaf fiber. Clearly, UK and NK have fiber column consists of many vascular bundles and xylem. Yet, PVA and PHK fiber cases were filled up capillary tube with thermosetting resin. After resin impregnation, weight of fiber was increased. In Table 1, the main characteristics of the resin are reported as specified by the manufacturer.

Fiber bundle tensile strength of differently treated kenaf fiber bundles has been measured and the results are shown in Figure 2. The average unit break for every set of treatment, which represents the bundle fiber tensile strength, was summarized in Figure 2. From the figure, the average unit break of the bundle of PHK fiber and PVK fiber are higher than UK and NK. This is explained by the resin impregnation method that contributes to the increase in strength. However when alkali treated fiber, the fiber bundle tensile strength was decreased. An alkali treatment would certainly damage the fiber and consequently reduce the tensile strength of the fiber. Bamboo bundle fiber tensile strength trend also similar with kenaf. Resin impregnated fiber is higher than untreated and phenolic resin impregnated fiber has highest tensile strength. In this test, fiber diameter was measuredin 2D and supposed fiber shape iscylindrical. This caused a huge error in Figure 2. In this study, we checked over 50 specimens then it was conclude that the bundle fiber tensile strength was improved.

The influence of fiber treatment on the tensile modulus and the tensile strength are illustrated in Figure 3 and Figure 4. In Figure 3, it can be seen that the tensile strength of the kenaf/PP composites increases with resin impregnation; whereas the strength of the kenaf/PP composite does not vary significantly with treatment. In contrast slightly PVA impregnation method case is higher than others. Bending test results shows PVA impregnation case is clearly 10% higher than others. It can be seen in Figure 3, the tensile strength of the bamboo/PP composites decreases with alkali treatment. This is because alkali solution was used when bamboo fiber was manufactured. So alkali treatment caused critical damage on fiber [9] [13] . Then resin impregnation method repaired fiber which is not enough to go over the untreated fiber reinforced composites.

Water absorption of composites relates to composite properties such as dimensional stability [14] [15] . The results of the water absorption tests are summarized below in Figure 5. It can be observed that the phenolic resin treated caused to decrease water absorption ratio but PVA treated caused the increase in absorption ratio. This is because PVA resin is one of hydrophilic material which can be caused due to link with water. These much lower values are obtained for composites than for fibers themselves, because cellulose fibers are covered by PP layers that slow down the diffusion of water.