<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2014.512126</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-51009</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Response of African Catfish, &lt;i&gt;Clarias gariepinus&lt;/i&gt; (Burchell 1822), Fingerlings Fed Diets Containing Differently Timed Wet-Heat-Treated Sesame (&lt;i&gt;Sesamum indicum&lt;/i&gt;) Seedmeal
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>A. Jimoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>O.</surname><given-names>A. Fagbenro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>E.</surname><given-names>O. Adeparusi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Fisheries Technology, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Moor Plantation, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>jawabus@gmail.com(.AJ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1159</fpage><lpage>1171</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The response of catfish fed differently timed wet-heat-treated sesame seedmeal was evaluated in the diet of 
  <em>Clarias gariepinus</em> using growth performance, nutrient utilisation and apparent digesti-bility coefficient as indices. Three batches of sesame seed, which were cooked for 10, 20 and 30 minutes, dried, milled, and mechanically defatted using locally made screw press. Each of these differently processed seedmeals was included in the diet of African catfish at varying replacement levels, 15, 30 and 45% with soybean meal. There was good growth performance and nutrient uti-lization by 
  <em>Clarias gariepinus</em> fed with differently timed wet-heat-treated sesame seed that was not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05) from fish fed control diet. More so, the apparent digestibility coef-ficient for organic matter, protein, energy, lipid, fibre, carbohydrate in 
  <em>Clarias gariepinus</em> fed with differently timed wet-heat-treated sesame seedmeal based diets in this study were comparable with the results obtained for fish fed control diets.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cooked Sesame</kwd><kwd> Clarias gariepinus</kwd><kwd> Growth Performance</kwd><kwd> Nutrient Utilization</kwd><kwd> Digestibility</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Nutrition plays a critical role in intensive aquaculture as it influences not only the production cost but also fish growth, health and waste production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref1">1</xref>] . Cost effective diets are essential for successful fish farming. The profitability and success of compound feed production depends on the cost, availability and digestibility of the feed ingredients to be used. The conventional feed ingredients for fish are mainly from plant and animal products especially by-products of processing plants. These products are also used as human food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref2">2</xref>] . Therefore there is a need to search for lesser known materials suitable for fish feed. Legumes are less expensive sources of protein that have been identified to be capable of reducing the cost of fish feed when combined as complementary ingredients to meet the nutritional requirement of fish. Soybean meal has high protein content and the best protein quality among plant protein feedstuffs used in fish feeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref3">3</xref>] . It has been reported to partially or totally replace fish meal in diets of many aquaculture species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref5">5</xref>] . However, wider utilization and availability of this conventional source for fish feed is limited by increasing demand for human consumption and by other animal feed industries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref6">6</xref>] . This phenomenon according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref7">7</xref>] has hindered the expansion and profitability of aquaculture enterprise in many developing countries and has to encourage the need to look for cheaper alternative protein source for the development of low-cost feed that can replace this conventional feedstuff without reducing the nutritional quality of the diets. It then becomes a priority to look for cheaper, alternative protein source. In the recent past, researches were mostly focused on the under-utilized plant proteins in fish diets. Prominent among which are soybean meal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref9">9</xref>] , groundnut cake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref10">10</xref>] , Lima bean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref11">11</xref>] , Jackbean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref13">13</xref>] , African Yam bean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref14">14</xref>] , Pigeon Pea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref15">15</xref>] . Relatively, work on the use of other oilseeds residue such as sesame meal in warm water fish nutrition is limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref16">16</xref>] . Sesame seed (Sesamum indicum) is one of the important annual crops of the world grown for oil. They have nutrient density comparable to other oilseed proteins including soybean meal and other conventional legumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref17">17</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref19">19</xref>] and their potentials as dietary protein sources are well recognized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref21">21</xref>] . In fish feeding, sesame seed cake had been tested with species such as Clarias gariepinus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref21">21</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref23">23</xref>] , common carp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref24">24</xref>] . The meal leftover after oil production containing 34% - 50% protein can be used as a feed for livestock and poultry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref25">25</xref>] . Furthermore, Sesame seed cake is known to be rich in methionine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref26">26</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref28">28</xref>] and also tryptophan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref30">30</xref>] , amino acids lacking in most plant protein feedstuffs and its incorporation in fish diets has been little investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref22">22</xref>] . This study therefore investigates the replacement value of differently timed wet- heat-treated sesame seedmeal with soybean meal in the diet of Clarias gariepinus using growth performance, digestibility and nutrient utilisation as indices.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>Fish meal, soybean meal and other feedstuffs obtained from commercial sources in Nigeria were separately milled, screened to fine particle size (&lt;250 &#181;m) and triplicate samples were analysed for proximate composition. Sesame seeds were obtained from a farm in Kebbi State. Three batches of sesame were cooked for 10, 20 and 30 minutes dried, milled in a hammer mill and mechanically defatted using the pressure generated from locally made screw press. The cake thereafter was analysed for its proximate composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref31">31</xref>] . Amino acid analysis of differently-processed sesame seedmeals were determined by using the ion exchange chromatography (IEC). The samples were defatted, hydrolyzed and evaporated in a rotator evaporator and then injected into the Automatic Technicon Sequential Multi-sample Amino Acid Analyser (Model No 0209, Technicon, Ireland). The gross energy content of samples was calculated based on the physiological value of 5.61Kcal/g protein, 9.50 Kcal/g lipid and 4.11 Kcal/g carbohydrate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><p>Based on the nutrient composition of the protein feedstuff (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), a control diet and nine test diets (40% crude protein, 12% crude lipid and 18.45 Mj/kg gross energy) were formulated. The control diet (CTR) contained soybean meal, providing 50% of total protein. Nine tests diets contained each of these differently pro- cessed seedmeals at three replacement levels, 15, 30 and 45%, for soybean meal (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The feedstuffs were ground and hot water was added to aid binding after which it was then introduced in a Hobart-200T pelleting and mixing machine to obtain a homogeneous mass and then passed through a mincer to produce 0.8 mm (long) 0.2 mm (diameter) pellet which was immediately be sun-dried (30˚C - 32˚C). After drying for some days, the diets were kept frozen in a refrigerator.</p><p>Clarias gariepinus fingerlings were acclimated to experimental condition for 7 days prior to the feeding trial. Groups of 15 catfish fingerlings (3.38 &#177; 0.015 g) were stocked into aquaria comprising 60 litre-capacity rectangular plastic tanks. Each diet was fed to the catfish in triplicate tanks twice daily (09.00 h, 16.00 h) at 5% body</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition (g/100g dry matter) and essential amino acid profile of feedstuff (g/100g protein)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Proximate Composition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CMS10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CMS20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CMS30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishmeal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean Meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn Meal</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude lipid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NFE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Amino Acid Profile * * *</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lysine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.04<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Histidine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arginine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.68<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.72<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threonine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cystine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methionine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isoleucine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leucine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.12<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.22<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tyrosine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenyalanine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Values obtained from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref32">32</xref>] ; CMS10: Sesame seeds cooked for 10 minutes; CMS20: Sesame seeds cooked for 20 minutes; CMS30: Sesame seeds cooked for 30 minutes.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Gross composition (g/100g dry matter) of experimental diets at varying replacement levels of differently cooked sesame seedmeals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CTR</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS1<sub>15</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS1<sub>30</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS1<sub>45</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS2<sub>15</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS2<sub>30</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS2<sub>45</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS3<sub>15</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS3<sub>30</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CSS3<sub>45</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishmeal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean Meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cooked Sesame</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn Meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fish Oil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*Vit/Min Premix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Specification: each kg contains: Vitamin A, 4,000,000 IU; Vitamin B, 800,000 IU; Vitamin E, 16,000 mg, Vitamin K<sub>3</sub>, 800 mg; Vitamin B<sub>1</sub>, 600 mg; Vitamin B<sub>2</sub>, 2000 mg; Vitamin B<sub>6</sub>, 1600 mg, Vitamin B<sub>12</sub>, 8 mg; Niacin,16,000 mg; Caplan, 4000 mg; Folic Acid, 400 mg; Biotin, 40 mg; Antioxidant 40,000 mg; Chlorine chloride, 120,000 mg; Manganese, 32,000 mg; Iron 16,000 mg; Zinc, 24,000 mg; Copper 32,000 mg; Iodine 320 mg; Cobalt, 120 mg; Selenium, 800 mg manufactured by DSM Nutritional products Europe Limited, Basle, Switzerland.</p><p>weight for 56 days. Fish mortality was monitored daily, total fish weight in each tank was determined at two weeks intervals and the amount of diet was adjusted according to the new weight. Growth response and feed utilization indices were estimated. Water temperature and dissolved oxygen were measured using a combined digital YSI dissolved oxygen meter (YSI Model 57, Yellow Spring Ohio); pH was monitored weekly using pH meter (Mettler Toledo-320, Jenway UK). Eight catfish and 6 catfish per treatment were respectively sacrificed at the beginning and end of the feeding trial respectively and analysed for their carcass composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref31">31</xref>] . All data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test using SPSS 13.0 version. Where ANOVA revealed significant difference (P &lt; 0.05), Duncan multiple range test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref34">34</xref>] was applied to characterize and quantity the differences between treatments.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Acid Insoluble Ash Analysis</title><p>AIA in feed and faeces was obtained by adding 25 ml of 10% HCl to their weighed ash content. This will then be covered with a water glass and boiled gently over a low flame for 5minutes after which it was filtered through ashless filter and washed with hot distilled water, the residue from the filter was returned into the crucible and then ignited until it is carbon-free and it was weighed. The AIA was calculated as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Digestibility Coefficient</title><p>The value obtained for AIA in different diets and faecal samples was used as indicator in the calculation of digestibility coefficient as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Organic Matter Digestibility (AOMD) was calculated as follow</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Diet Performance Evaluation</title><p>Growth performance and nutrient utilization of fish was determined following the methods of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref21">21</xref>] in term of Final Individual Weight, Survival (%), Specific Growth Rate (SGR %/ day), Feed Conversion Ratio, (FCR) and Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER), Net Protein Utilisation (NPU) responses was calculated as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.51009-formula353"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51009-formula354"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51009-formula355"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.51009-formula356"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>All data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test using SPSS 13.0 version. Where ANOVA revealed significant difference (P &lt; 0.05), Duncan’s multiple-range test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref34">34</xref>] was applied to characterize and quantity the differences between treatments.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Proximate Composition and Amino Acid Profile of the Experimental Diets</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed the proximate composition of experimental diets and amino acid profile of the experimental diets fed to Clarias gariepinus. It revealed the diets to be isonitrogenous, isolipidic as well as isocalorific as there</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition and amino acid profile of experimental diets fed to Clarias gariepinus at varying replacement levels of differently cooked sesame seedmeals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="27"  >Proximate Composition (g/100g DM) and Gross Energy (Kcal/100g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CTR</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CSM<sub>115</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CSM<sub>130</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CSM<sub>145</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CSM<sub>215</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CSM<sub>230</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CSM<sub>245</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CSM<sub>315</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CSM<sub>330</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CSM<sub>345</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="27"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.43 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.55 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9.72 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.79 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9.36 &#177; 0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9.65 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9.57 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9.46 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >9.57 &#177; 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.33 &#177; 0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.53 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.61 &#177; 0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.50 &#177; 0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.41 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.69 &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.60 &#177; 0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.48 &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.29 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.33 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.05 &#177; 0.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipid</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.30 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.25 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.21 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.39 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.29 &#177; 0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.39 &#177; 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.41 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.40 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.52 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.20 &#177; 0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibre</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.25 &#177; 0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.48 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.36 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.38 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.36 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.34 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.39 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.30 &#177; 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.63 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.36 &#177; 0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.56 &#177; 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.63 &#177; 0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.50 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.36 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.53 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.38 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.44 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.76 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.46 &#177; 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.74 &#177; 0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NFE</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25.93 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25.47 &#177; 0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.71 &#177; 0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25.67 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.77 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.64 &#177; 1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.71 &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.78 &#177; 0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.48 &#177; 0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >26.31 &#177; 1.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >450.15 &#177; 5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >448.30 &#177; 1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >448.21 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >449.25 &#177; 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >450.27 &#177; 3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >450.22 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >449.96 &#177; 1.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >449.15 &#177; 3.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >449.30 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >448.06 &#177; 2.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="27"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="26"  >Amino Acid Profile (g/100g Protein)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Lysine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Histidine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Arginine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >4.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >4.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Threonine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cystine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Valine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Methionine/ TSA</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Isoleucine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Leucine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >4.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >3.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Tyrosine</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Phenyalanine/ TAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>**</sup>Amino Acid requirement of Clarias gariepinus Source: Uys (1989); Unprasert, N. G. (1994).</p><p>was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) in the crude protein, crude lipid and energy contents of the experimental diets. The protein, energy and lipid contents of the diet met the dietary requirement of Clarias gariepinus. Fish in different dietary groups actively fed on the experimental diets throughout the experiments.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Whole Body Composition</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> revealed the whole body composition of fish fed differently cooked sesame meal based diets at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. There was significant difference (P &lt; 0.05) between the initial and final body composition of fish used during the experiments with respect to moisture crude protein, crude lipid and ash content. Among the fish fed the experimental diets, the highest value of tissue crude protein was recorded in fish fed CSF<sub>330</sub> but this did not significantly (P &gt; 0.05) differ from the values observed for the fish fed CTR, CSM<sub>115</sub>, CSM<sub>215</sub>, CSM<sub>315</sub>, CSM<sub>230</sub> while the lowest value of tissue crude protein was recorded for fish fed CSM<sub>145</sub> though this did not significantly differ (P &gt; 0.05) from fish fed CSM<sub>245</sub> and CSM<sub>345</sub>. The lowest crude lipid was recorded in the initial body composition of fish used for the experiment which was significantly different (P &lt; 0.05) from that of the final body composition while the highest lipid content was recorded in fish fed diet CSM<sub>115</sub>. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in lipid content of the fish fed diets CTR and other test diets. The highest ash content was recorded in fish fed diet CSM<sub>345</sub>, however, this was not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05) from fish fed other test diets except that of CTR. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the ash contents of the fish fed diets<sub> </sub>CTR and CSM<sub>130</sub>, CSM<sub>145</sub>, and CSM<sub>245</sub>. The HSI of the fish fed diffe-</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition of carcass of Clarias gariepinus fed varying levels of cooked samples sesame seedmeal based diets</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Experimental Diets</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>115</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>130</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>145</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>215</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>230</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>245</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>315</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>330</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>345</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.61 &#177; 0.10<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.25 &#177; 0.31<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.16 &#177; 0.20<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.14 &#177; 0.25<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.16 &#177; 0.13<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.94 &#177; 0.37<sup>bcd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.75 &#177; 0.11<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.16 &#177; 0.34<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.92 &#177; 0.14<sup>bcd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.70 &#177; 0.10<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.93 &#177; 0.25<sup>bcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.29 &#177; 0.01<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.68 &#177; 0.20<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.68 &#177; 0.09<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50 &#177; 0.04<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.42 &#177; 0.04<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.69 &#177; 0.09<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.62 &#177; 0.03<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.48 &#177; 0.04<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.70 &#177; 0.02<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.70 &#177; 0.02<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.54 &#177; 0.05<sup>bcd </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32 &#177; 0.04<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83 &#177; 0.04<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.73 &#177; 0.10<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84 &#177; 0.10<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.87 &#177; 0.09<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.74 &#177; 0.10<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85 &#177; 0.09<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.81 &#177; 0.17<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.75 &#177; 0.08<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84 &#177; 0.09<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.75 &#177; 0.26<sup>b </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77 &#177; 0.13<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24 &#177; 0.18<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.43 &#177; 0.17<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52 &#177; 0.31<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55 &#177; 0.21<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62 &#177; 0.24<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.78 &#177; 0.06<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54 &#177; 0.29<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64 &#177; 0.08<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76 &#177; 0.06<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77 &#177; 0.06<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 &#177; 0.03<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80 &#177; 0.02<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79 &#177; 0.02<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 0.01<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81 &#177; 0.01<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 0.02<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 0.02<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 0.02<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77 &#177; 0.03<sup>bcd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74 &#177; 0.02<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72 &#177; 0.01<sup>e </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Row means with different superscripts are significantly different (p &lt; 0.05). Row means with no superscripts are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05); HSI: Hepatosomatic Index.</p><p>rently cooked sesame seedmeal based diets differ significantly (P &lt; 0.05) but there was no significant difference between the control and CSM<sub>115</sub>, CSM<sub>130</sub>, CSM<sub>145</sub>, CSM<sub>215</sub> and CSM<sub>315</sub>.<sub> </sub></p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Growth Performance and Nutrient Utilization</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> presents growth performance and nutrient utilization of Clarias gariepinus fed varying levels of cooked sesame meal based experimental diets. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the initial mean weight of the fish at the beginning of the experiment. Although the fish fed the control diets had the best growth performance, the Feed Conversion Ratio, Protein Efficiency Ratio and Net Protein Utilization were not statistically different (P &gt; 0.05) among the fish fed different dietary treatments. So also the specific growth rate of fish fed these diets were not statistically different (P &gt; 0.05) from that of control except those fed CSM<sub>345</sub>. Percentage survival in all the fish fed dietary treatment was above 80 and there was no significant difference in percentage survival of all the fish fed the dietary treatment. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> represents the growth curve of Clarias gariepinus fed varying levels of cooked sesame meal based experimental diets.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Proximate Composition of the Faeces</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> showed the proximate composition of faecal samples of Clarias gariepinus fed varying levels of cooked sesame meal based diets. There was reduction in the nutrient contents of the faecal samples tested when compared with the nutrient contents of the feed. There was no significant difference ((P &gt; 0.05) in the moisture content of the faecal samples of fish fed the different dietary treatment. There was significant difference in the crude protein content (P &lt; 0.05) of the faecal samples of fish fed the different dietary treatments. The fish fed diet CTR had the lowest faecal crude protein content while those fed with diets CSM<sub>245</sub> and CSM<sub>345</sub> had the highest faecal crude protein. Fish fed diet CTR, CSM<sub>115</sub>, CSM<sub>130</sub> and CSM<sub>230</sub> were not significantly different in their faecal crude protein contents. The fish fed diet CTR had the lowest faecal crude lipid content while those fed with diet CSM<sub>345</sub> had the highest faecal crude lipid content. There was no significant difference ((P &gt; 0.05) in the crude lipid content of the faecal output of fish fed diet CTR and fish fed other test diets except diets CSM<sub>115</sub>, CSM<sub>215</sub>, CSM<sub>315</sub>, CSM<sub>130</sub> CSM<sub>230</sub>, CSM<sub>245</sub> and CSM<sub>330</sub>. The fibre content of the faecal output of the fish fed dietary treatment were not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05) from one another. The fish fed diet CTR had the lowest faecal crude fibre. Other fish fed on test diets were not statistically different ((P &gt; 0.05) in their faecal crude fibre from that of control except that fed with CSM<sub>145</sub>. The ash contents of the faecal samples of fish fed the differently cooked sesame meal based dietary treatments were not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05) from that of control except the fish fed with CSM<sub>330</sub>. The highest NFE value was recorded in fish fed CTR while the fish fed CSM<sub>345</sub> recorded the lowest NFE value. There was significant difference (P &lt; 0.05) in the NFE value of the faecal output of the fish fed the differently cooked sesame meal based dietary treatments<sub>.</sub> The AIA in faeces of the fish fed various dietary treatment were not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05). Similarly no significantly variation (P &gt; 0.05) was recorded in the energy value of the faecal samples of fish fed all the test diets from that of control except those fed with CSM<sub>245</sub> and CSM<sub>345</sub>.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Growth performance and nutrients utilisation of Clarias gariepinus fed cooked sesame meal based diets</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Experimental Diets</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CTR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>115</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>130</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>145</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>215</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>230</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>245</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>315</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>330</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>345</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial Weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.37 &#177; 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33 &#177; 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.57 &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.52 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29 &#177; 0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39 &#177; 0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40 &#177; 0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.52 &#177; 0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final Weight(g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.80 &#177; 0.31<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.18 &#177; 0.52<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.55 &#177; 0.16<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.74 &#177; 0.93<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.95 &#177; 0.74<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.06 &#177; 0.69<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.61 &#177; 0.49<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.20 &#177; 0.34<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.69 &#177; 0.57<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.71 &#177; 0.27<sup>c </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>1</sup>MWG (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.43 &#177; 0.18<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85 &#177; 0.23<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.98 &#177; 0.22<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.22 &#177; 0.98<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.66 &#177; 0.48<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.67 &#177; 1.06<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.90 &#177; 0.61<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.93 &#177; 0.23<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29 &#177; 0.54<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.18 &#177; 0.12<sup>c </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>2</sup>%WG (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >239.99 &#177; 23.06<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.99 &#177; 11.50<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.06 &#177; 17.09<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.51 &#177; 32.85<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225.40 &#177; 3.26<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246.48 &#177; 46.62<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.46 &#177; 19.02<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256.55 &#177; 13.18<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.30 &#177; 28.79<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203.30 &#177; 8.50<sup>b </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>3</sup>SGR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67 &#177; 0.02<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63 &#177; 0.04<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65 &#177; 0.01<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66 &#177; 0.06<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61 &#177; 0.05<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.69 &#177; 0.05<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65 &#177; 0.03<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70 &#177; 0.02<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66 &#177; 0.04<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.59 &#177; 0.02<sup>c </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>4</sup>FCR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08 &#177; 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17 &#177; 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20 &#177; 0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>5</sup>PER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33 &#177; 0.2184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30 &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.29 &#177; 0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09 &#177; 0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>6</sup>NPU%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.78 &#177; 9.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.91 &#177; 8.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.92 &#177; 5.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.70 &#177; 1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.63 &#177; 4.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.00 &#177; 5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.35 &#177; 1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.78 &#177; 5.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.48 &#177; 1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.58 &#177; 3.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>7</sup>Survival%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.78 &#177; 10.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.78 &#177; 7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.22 &#177; 7.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.67 &#177; 6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.22 &#177; 7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.44 &#177; 7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.67 &#177; 6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.22 &#177; 10.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.67 &#177; 6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.68 &#177; 6.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Row means with different superscripts are significantly different (p &lt; 0.05); Row means with no superscripts are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05); <sup>1</sup>Mean weight gain = final mean weight − initial mean weight; <sup>2</sup>Percentage weight gain = [final weight − initial weight/initial weight] &#215; 100; <sup>3</sup>Specific growth rate = [In final weight − In initial weight] &#215; 100; <sup>4</sup>Feed conversion ratio = dry weight of feed fed/Weight gain (g); <sup>5</sup>Protein efficiency ratio = fish body weight (g)/Protein fed; <sup>6</sup>Net protein utilization = [protein gain/protein fed] &#215; 100; <sup>7</sup>Percentage survival = {(total number of fish − mortality)/total number of fish] &#215; 100.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition (g/100g dry matter) of faecal samples of Clarias gariepinus fed at varying replacement levels of cooked samples of sesame seedmeal based diets</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Experimental Diets</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>115</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>130</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>145</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>215</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>230</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>245</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>315</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>330</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>345</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.02 &#177; 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.80 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.33 &#177; 0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.49 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.46 &#177; 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95 &#177; 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.36 &#177; 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.26 &#177; 0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.25 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.81 &#177; 0.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.64 &#177; 0.61<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.71 &#177; 0.32<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.42 &#177; 0.27<sup>cde </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.01 &#177; 0.32<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.54 &#177; 0.23<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.43 &#177; 0.05<sup>cde </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00 &#177; 0.75<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.68 &#177; 0.08<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.23 &#177; 0.82<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.85 &#177; 0.54<sup>a </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22 &#177; 0.14<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47 &#177; 0.74<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.98 &#177; 0.50<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.76 &#177; 0.97<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.37 &#177; 0.88<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77 &#177; 0.79<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.38 &#177; 1.11<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.54 &#177; 0.58<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.19 &#177; 0.92<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.11 &#177; 0.32<sup>a </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.85 &#177; 0.63<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.47 &#177; 0.63<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.62 &#177; 0.63<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.43 &#177; 0.33<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.05 &#177; 0.42<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.82 &#177; 0.71<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.58 &#177; 0.62<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.37 &#177; 0.89<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.94 &#177; 0.55<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76 &#177; 0.92<sup>ab </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.17 &#177; 0.40<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86 &#177; 0.52<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.97 &#177; 0.42<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.91 &#177; 0.62<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.21 &#177; 0.18<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.89 &#177; 0.47<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.60 &#177; 0.62<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.84 &#177; 0.68<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95 &#177; 0.41<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.28 &#177; 1.04<sup>a </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>1</sup>NFE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.10 &#177; 0.27<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.69 &#177; 0.96<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.68 &#177; 1.10<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.40 &#177; 0.63<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.37 &#177; 0.87<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.13 &#177; 1.34<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.08 &#177; 0.71<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.29 &#177; 0.83<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.43 &#177; 0.91<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.18 &#177; 1.20<sup>d </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>2</sup>AIA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35 &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47 &#177; 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44 &#177; 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.39 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60 &#177; 0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52 &#177; 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28 &#177; 0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348 &#177; 5.50<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345.01 &#177; 5.88<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349.63 &#177; 3.90<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352.48 &#177; 8.29<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >343.26 &#177; 6.10<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349.60 &#177; 2.40<sup>abc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >358.72 &#177; 3.97<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345.36 &#177; 7.28<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346.96 &#177; 9.73<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361.17 &#177; 5.28<sup>a </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Row means with different superscripts are significantly different (p &lt; 0.05); Row means with no superscripts are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05); <sup>1</sup>NFE: Nitrogen Free Extract; <sup>2</sup>AIA: Acid Insoluble Ash. Energy (kcal/100g).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Apparent Digestibility Coefficients of the Nutrients in Each Diet</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> presents apparent digestibility coefficient of nutrients in cooked sesame meal based diets fed to Clarias gariepinus fingerlings. The fish fed various dietary treatment showed significant difference (P &lt; 0.05) in their nutrient digestibility’s values. There was significant variation (P &lt; 0.05) in the AOMD of the fish fed the differently cooked sesame meal based diets<sub>. </sub>The fish fed diet CSM<sub>315</sub> had the highest AOMD value while those fed with CSM<sub>345</sub> had the lowest AOMD. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in AOMD of the fish fed control diets and the fish fed test diets except CSM<sub>345</sub> and CSM<sub>115</sub>. Similarly, there was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the APD of the fish fed control diet and the fish fed test diets CSM<sub>115</sub>, CSF<sub>215 </sub>and CSF<sub>315</sub>. The ALD</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Growth curve of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings fed differently cooked sesame meal based diet</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-3000718x14.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Apparent digestibility coefficient of nutrients of cooked sesame meal based diets fed to Clarias gariepinus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="11"  >Experimental Diets</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CTR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>115</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>130</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>145</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>215</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>230</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>245</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>315</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>330</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CSM<sub>345</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOMD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.94 &#177; 0.06<sup>bc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.42 &#177; 0.54<sup>cd</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.25 &#177; 0.21<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.90 &#177; 0.08<sup>bc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.53 &#177; 0.30<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.87 &#177; 0.53<sup>bc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.16 &#177; 0.56<sup>abc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.86 &#177; 0.03<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.36 &#177; 0.55<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.92 &#177; 0.51<sup>d</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.10 &#177; 0.29<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.88 &#177; 0.03<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.78 &#177; 0.14<sup>b</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.71 &#177; 0.06<sup>d</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.87 &#177; 0.02<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.64 &#177; 0.10<sup>b</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.72 &#177; 0.15<sup>e</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.84 &#177; 0.03<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.33 &#177; 0.26<sup>c</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.06 &#177; 0.15<sup>f</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.34 &#177; 0.07<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.53 &#177; 1.49<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.00 &#177; 0.78<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.56 &#177; 1.55<sup>bc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.38 &#177; 1.21<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.37 &#177; 1.26<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.36 &#177; 2.51<sup>abc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.34 &#177; 0.90<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.02 &#177; 1.56<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.99 &#177; 0.68<sup>c</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AED</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.17 &#177; 0.12<sup>bc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.85 &#177; 0.61<sup>c</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.25 &#177; 0.33<sup>abc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.88 &#177; 0.34<sup>c</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.88 &#177; 0.05<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.04 &#177; 0.51<sup>c</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.79 &#177; 0.67<sup>c</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.99 &#177; 0.26<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.52 &#177; 0.37<sup>abc</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.59 &#177; 0.46<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AAD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.17 &#177; 2.84<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.31 &#177; 3.77<sup>b</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.09 &#177; 0.56<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.26 &#177; 2.33<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.69 &#177; 1.36<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.40 &#177; 0.66<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.96 &#177; 3.25<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.05 &#177; 2.44<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.62 &#177; 0.19<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.50 &#177; 2.53<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AFD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.35 &#177; 0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.71 &#177; 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.72 &#177; 1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.59 &#177; 1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.52 &#177; 0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.73 &#177; 1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.92 &#177; 3.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.48 &#177; 3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.00 &#177; 3.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.74 &#177; 8.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ACD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.31 &#177; 0.88<sup>de</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.79 &#177; 2.96<sup>e</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.68 &#177; 0.83<sup>bcd</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.95 &#177; 0.21<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.57 &#177; 1.67<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.44 &#177; 1.78<sup>cde</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.75 &#177; 0.18<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.26 &#177; 0.87<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.52 &#177; 0.10<sup>ab</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.39 &#177; 0.43<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Row means with different superscripts are significantly different (p &lt; 0.05); Row means with no superscripts are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05); AOMD: Apparent Organic Matter Digestibility; APD: Apparent Protein Digestibility; ALD: Apparent Lipid Digestibility; AED: Apparent Energy Digestibility; AAD: Apparent Ash Digestibility; AFD: Apparent Fibre Digestibility; ACD: Apparent Carbohydrate Digestibility.</p><p>of the fish fed CTR was not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05) from the fish fed other dietary treatments except the fish fed CSM<sub>145</sub> and the fish fed CSM<sub>345</sub>. Similarly no significant variation (P &gt; 0.05) was recorded in the AED coefficient between the fish fed CTR and the fish fed other test diets except in the fish fed CSM<sub>315 </sub>which has the highest values of AED and the fish fed CSM<sub>345</sub>. Apparent ash digestibility in all fish fed the test diets did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) from control except in the fish fed CSM<sub>245</sub>. There was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) in the AFD of the fish fed control diet and other test diets. The fish fed CSM<sub>245 </sub>had the highest value of ACD while the lowest value of ACD was recorded in the fish fed CSM<sub>115</sub>. No significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) existed in the ACD coefficients between the fish fed CSM<sub>245</sub> and those of the fish fed CSM<sub>345</sub>, CSM<sub>145</sub>, CSM<sub>330</sub>, CSM<sub>315</sub>, CSM<sub>330</sub> and CSM<sub>215</sub>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Comparable performance in growth, nutrient utilization and carcass crude protein deposition in Clarias gariepinus fed diets with processed sesame seedmeal based diets showed that the nutritive value of raw sesame seedmeal could be improved by cooking. This is evidenced in more superior growth performance and nutrient utilization of Clarias gariepinus fed differently cooked sesame seedmeal even at higher replacement level than those fed raw [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref23">23</xref>] at level to level comparison. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref35">35</xref>] reported good growth performance that was not significantly different from control was recorded when Clarias gariepinus was fed diets containing autoclaved nor roasted winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) replacing up to 80% of fishmeal. Similarly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref13">13</xref>] reported that 60% of soybean meal protein could be replaced be replaced with Rosselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) seed meal without affecting growth performance and nutrient utilization in Clarias gariepinus. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref21">21</xref>] reported that it is possible to replace soybean meal in Clarias gariepinus diet with cooked and mechanically defatted sesame seed meal with optimum growth response at a 25% replacement level though at 50% replacement with sesame seedmeal the growth response was different from that of control however it was similar to that of fish fed diets containing cooked and mechanically defatted sesame seed meal at a 25% replacement level with soybean meal. Similarly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref36">36</xref>] reported that growth was positively affected by the replacement of up to 52% fish meal by sesame oil cake without amino acid supplementation in a practical pelleted feed for rainbow trout without reducing growth performance when compared to a fishmeal control diets. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref37">37</xref>] reported that 62.5% of fishmeal protein replacement by plant proteins showed similar growth performance and feed utilization. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref38">38</xref>] submitted that thermal pro- cessing of raw pea seed meal improved the quality of the ingredients and that dry heat treatment in particular (180˚C:30 min) led to a greatly improved feed utilization and consequent better growth performances. The response of C. gariepinus with respect to SGR was in accordance with those typically obtained for this species by other workers. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref9">9</xref>] reported similar values for growth and feed utilization data for soybean meal as a fish meal substitute in practical diets for C. gariepinus. Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref38">38</xref>] reported mean SGR of 2.2 - 2.4%/day. Furthermore [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref39">39</xref>] reported mean SGR values of 2.7%/day for juveniles C. gariepinus. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref40">40</xref>] also reported a superior growth performance and feed utilization for juvenile rainbow trout fed diets in which pea seed meal was subjected to cooking.</p><p>The apparent digestibility coefficient for organic matter, protein, energy, lipid, fibre, carbohydrate in Clarias gariepinus fed processed seedmeal based diets in this study were more superior than those fed raw sesame seedmeal by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref41">41</xref>] and comparable with the results obtained for fish fed control diets. The values of apparent digestibility coefficient of nutrients recorded in this study were in agreement with the values reported for carp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref42">42</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><p>The organic matter digestibility coefficient reported in this study was slightly higher than the value reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref45">45</xref>] the variation may be attributed to processing methods, and or the variation may be attributed to processing methods, and or experimental methodology; different seed meal and fish species was used as it is known that digestibility of nutrients are species specific however the result closely related to that reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref46">46</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref47">47</xref>] for juvenile hybrid tilapia fed cottonseed meal. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref20">20</xref>] reported AOMD of the sunflower diets fed to Tilapia rendalli was over 90%.</p><p>The values of apparent digestibility of protein and lipid for the control diet and diets containing processed sesame seedmeal obtained during the experiment were almost similar to those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref48">48</xref>] . The apparent protein digestibility coefficients of sunflower and sesame meal based diets were similar to the values reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref49">49</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref50">50</xref>] reported that sunflower protein concentrate fed to rainbow trout had protein digestibility coefficients ranging from 79.5 to 90.6%. The results of this study also indicated that irrespective of the replacement levels (15, 30 and 45%), the protein in them were well digested by Clarias gariepinus. The ranges of APD values in various ingredients of plant origin as reported earlier are 76.2% - 94.0% in rohu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref51">51</xref>] , 78.9% - 85.8% in common carp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref17">17</xref>] , 52.5% - 94.1% in catla [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref53">53</xref>] and 81.2% - 92.8% in mrigal and grass carp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref54">54</xref>] . It could therefore be established that sesame oil cakes, may be used for partial replacement of soybean meal in formulating the diets for Clarias gariepinus, as they are high in protein content with a fairly good digestible protein. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref49">49</xref>] concluded that many of the ingredients tested, particularly the oil cakes, may be used for partial or total replacement of scarce and costly fishmeal in formulating the diets for silver barb, as they are high in protein content with a fairly good digestible protein.</p><p>The earlier reported ranges of apparent lipid digestibility (ALD) coefficient for plant-derived feedstuffs are 73.4% - 100% in red tilapia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref55">55</xref>] 79.6% - 90.2% in Nile tilapia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref56">56</xref>] , 69.6% - 86.4% in catla [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref52">52</xref>] , 90.4% - 94.1% and in rohu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref51">51</xref>] . A range of 76% to 97% fat digestibility of various sources of fat has been reported for channel catfish. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref57">57</xref>] reported that the ability to digest fat appears to be influenced by temperature and the level of fat in the diet. Sesame oil has excellent nutritional properties. They are practically free of toxic composition. In this study, the ALD did not vary widely among the differently processed diets containing sesame seed meal. This indicates that the C. gariepinus has the capacity to digest oil that are available in the plant feedstuffs as effectively as the animal oil from fishmeal and therefore, may use both the plant and the animal oil efficiently as source of energy. The high lipid digestibility by this species was found to be in line with what was reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref58">58</xref>] for rainbow trout [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref51">51</xref>] . Then [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref49">49</xref>] did not observe much difference in lipid digestibility between plant- and animal-derived feedstuffs for rohu, which agrees with the present finding for C. gariepinus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref51">51</xref>] . And [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref49">49</xref>] observed an ALD value of over 90% in soybean meal for rohu, the results of which were consistent with the ALD of diet containing sesame seed meal for the C. gariepinus in this study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref11">11</xref>] . Then [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref59">59</xref>] reported that nutrient digestibility of Oreochromis niloticus fed lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) and jackbean meal (Cannavalia ensiformis) diets respectively was improved with toasting and autoclaving.</p><p>The low carbohydrate digestibility recorded in this study was similar to that reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref11">11</xref>] for Oreochromis niloticus fed lima bean. The digestibility of carbohydrate has been known to vary with their complexity of carbohydrate, source treatment and level of inclusion in the diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref60">60</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.51009-ref63">63</xref>] compared the digestibility and growth performance of rainbow trout fed diets containing peas processed by different methods and reported that autoclaving increased starch and energy digestibility.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors appreciate Alh Ali Jamiu Alaba (Port Harcourt, Nigeria) for his contribution towards the publication of this article.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.51009-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gatlin III, D.M. (2002) Nutrition and Fish Health. In: Halver, J.E. and Hardy, R.W., Eds., Fish Nutrition, 3rd Edition, Academic Press, London, 671-702.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Southern Regional Aquaculture Centre (SRAC) (2010) Principle of Fish Nutrition. SRAC Publication No 5003, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davies, S.J., Fagbenro, O.A., Abdelwaritho, A. and Diller, I. (1999) Use of Soybean Products as Fishmeal substitute in African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Applied Tropical Agriculture, 14, 10-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lovell</surname><given-names> R.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1988</year>)<article-title>Use of Soybean Products in Diets for Aquaculture Species</article-title><source> Journal of Aquatic Production</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 27</fpage>-<lpage>52</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lim, C. and Akinyama, D. (1992) Full Fat Utilization of Soybean Meal by Fish. Asian Fisheries Society, 5, 181-197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siddhuraju, P. and Becker, K. (2001) Preliminary Nutritional Evaluation of Mucuna Seed Meal (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): An Assessment by GROWTH performance and Feed Utilization. Aquaculture, 196, 105-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00577-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balogun, A.M. (1988) Feeding Fish with Alternative Food Formulation and Resource: Prospects, Problems and Implication. Proceeding of the National Workshop in Alternative Food Formulation for Livestock Feed in Nigeria, Ilorin, 21-25 November 1988, 669-697.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balogun, A.M. and Ologhobo, A.D. (1989) Growth Performance and Nutrient Utilization of Fingerlings of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) Fed Raw and Cooked Soybean Diets. Aquaculture, 76,119-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90256-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbenro, O.A. and Davies, S.J. (2001) Use of Soybean Flour (Dehulled Solvent-Extracted Soybean) as a Fish Meal Substitute in Practical Diets for African Catfish. Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822): Growth, Feed Utilization and Digestibility. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17, 64-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2001.00252.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fasakin E. A. and Balogun A. M. (1996) Replacement of Groundnut Cake with Processes Soybean Meal in Diets for the Clariid Catfish Clarias gariepinus Fingerlings. Applied Tropical Agriculture, 1, 5-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adeparusi, E.O. and Jimoh, W.A. (2002) Digestibility Coefficient of Raw and Processes Lima Bean for Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 12, 89-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J028v12n03_09</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osuigwe, D.I., Obiekezie, A.I. and Ogunji, J.O. (2002) Preliminary Evaluation of Jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis) Seed Meal as a Substitute Forfishmeal in Diets for Clarias gariepinus. Challenges to Organic Farming Deutscher Tropentag, Kassel, 9-11 October 2002. http://mars.wiz.unikassel.de/tropentagproceeding/2002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbenro, O.A., Adeparusi, E.O. and Jimoh, W.A. (2007) Evaluation and Nutrients Quality of Detoxified Jackbean Seeds, Cooked in Distilled Water or Trona Solution, as a Substitute for Soybean Meal in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, Diets. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 19, 83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J028v19n02_05</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adeparusi, E.O. and Balogun, A.M. (1999) Roasted Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) Meal as a Dietary Protein Source for Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Applied Tropical Agriculture, 4, 31-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adeparusi</surname><given-names> E.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Effect of Processing on Some Minerals, Anti Nutrients and Nutritional Composition of African Yam Bean, (Sphenostylis Sternocarpa)</article-title><source> Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the environment</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 101</fpage>-<lpage>108</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Davies S.J.</surname><given-names> Fagbenro O.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Abdel-Waritho A. and Diller</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Use of Soybean Products as Fishmeal Substitute in African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus</article-title><source> Applied Tropical Agriculture</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 10</fpage>-<lpage>19</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.A. and Jauncey, K. (1989) Studies on the Protein, Energy and Amino Acid Digestibility of Fish Meal, Mustard Oil Cake, Linseed and Sesame Meal for Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture, 83, 59-72.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90060-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.A. and Jauncey, K. (1989) Nutritional Evaluation of Some Bangladeshi Oil Seed Meals as Partial Substitutes for Fish Meal in the Diets of Common Carp, Cyprinus carpio L. Aquaculture Research, 20, 255-268.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jimoh, W.A., Fagbenro, O.A. and Adeparusi, E.O. (2011) Effect of Processing on the Nutrient, Mineral and Antinutrients Composition of Sesame Seed Meal, Sesamum indicum. Electronic Journal of Environmental Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 10, 1858-1864.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olvera-Novoa, M.A., Olivera-Castillo, L. and Martinez-Palacois, C.A. (2002) Sunflower Seed Meal as a Protein Source in Diets for Tilapia rendalli (Boulanger, 1896) Fingelings. Aquaculture Research, 33, 223-230.http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2002.00666.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jimoh, W.A. and Aroyehun, H.T. (2011) Evaluation of Cooked and Mechanically Defatted Sesame (Sesamum indicum) Seed Meal as a Replacer for Soybean Meal in the Diet of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 11, 185-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.4194/trjfas.2011.0202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olukunle, O.A. and Falaye, A.E (1998) Use of Sesame Seed Cake as Replacement for Fish Meal in Diets for Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Applied Tropical Agriculture, 3, 86-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbenro, O.A., Adeparusi, E.O. and Jimoh, W.A. (2010) Nutritional Evaluation of Raw Sunflower and Sesame Seed Meal in Clarias gariepinus: An Assessment by Growth Performance and Nutrient Utilization. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 3096-3101.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.A. and Jauncey, K. (1990) Detoxication of Oil Seed and Sesame Meal and Evaluation of These Nutritive Values in the Diets of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Asian Fisheries Science, 3, 169-183.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ECHO (2006) Echo Plant Information Sheet. Sesame Sesamum indicum. http://www.echonet.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, K.J. (1971) Nutritional Framework of Oilseed Proteins. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 48, 625-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02544576</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brito, O.J. (1981) Usage of Sesame as a Source of Protein for Human Consumption. Dissertation Abstract International B, 41, 105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rao, M.S.N. (1985) Nutritional Aspect of Oil Seeds. In: Srivastava, H.C., Bhaskaran, S., Vatsya, B. and Menon, K.K.G., Eds., Oil Seed Productions—Contraints and Opportunities, Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, 625-634.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, L.A., Suleiman, T.M. and Lusas, E.W. (1979) Sesame Protein: A Review and Prospects. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 56, 463-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02671542</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yen</surname><given-names> G.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Shyu</surname><given-names> S.L. amd Lin. J.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1986</year>)<article-title>Studies on Protein and Oil Composition of Sesame Seeds</article-title><source> Journal of Agriculture and Forestry</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 177</fpage>-<lpage>181</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Association of official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1990) Official Method of Analysis. 15th Edition, Helrich, K., Ed., Vol. 1, AOAC, Arlington, 684 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (1993) Nutrient Requirement for Fish. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 114 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tacon, A.G.J. (1997) Fishmeal Replacer. Review of Antinutrients within Oilseeds and Pulses—A Limiting Factor for the Aquafeed Green Revolution? Proceeding of the Workshop of the CIHEAM Network on Technology of Aquaculture in the Mediterranean (TECAM), Mazarron, 24-26 June 1996, 153-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd Edition, Snavely, S.L., Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 662 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbenro, O.A. (1999) Comparative Evaluation of Heat-Processed Winged Bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) Meals as Partial Replacement for Fish Meal in the Diets for African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Aquaculture, 170, 297-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00409-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thu, T.T.N., Bodin, N., De Saeger, S., Lanrodelle, Y. and Rollin, X. (2011) Substitution of Fishmeal by Sesame Oil Cake (Sesamum indica L.) in the Diet of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.). Aquaculture Nutrition, 17, 80-89.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00732.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, V., Akinleye, A.O., Makkar, H.P.S., Angulo-Escalante, M.A. and Becker, K. (2011) Growth Performance and Metabolic Efficiency in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) Fed on a Diet Containing Jatropha platyphylla Kernel Meal as a Protein Source. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 95, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davies, S.J. and Gouveia, A. (2008) Enhancing the Nutritional Value of Pea Seed Meals (Pisum sativum) by Thermal Treatment or Specific Isogenic Selection with Comparison to Soybean Meal for African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Aquaculture, 283, 116-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, M.Z. and Jauncey, K. (2005) Approaches to Optimization Dietary Protein to Energy Ratio for African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1892). Aquaculture Nutrition, 11, 95-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2004.00325.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gouveia, A., Teles, A.O., Gomes, E. and Rema, P. (1993) Effect of Cooking /Expansion of Three Legume Seeds on Growth and Food Utilisation by Rainbow Trout. In: Kaushik, S.J. and Luquet, P., Eds., Fish Nutrition in Practice, INRA Special Publication Les Colloques, 933-938.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbenro, O.A., Adeparusi, E.O. and Jimoh, W.A. (2013) Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Sunflower and Sesame Seed Meal in Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Fingerlings. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 8, 43-50.http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jfas.2013.43.50</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, R.R., Peterson, M.C. and Alfred, A.C. (1980) The Effect of Leaching on Apparent Digestion Coefficients in Determining Digestibility and Metabolisable Energy of Food Stuff for Salmounds. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 42, 195-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1980)42[195:EOLOAD]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanz, A., Morales, A.E., de la Higuera, M. and Cardenete, G. (1994) Sunflower Meal Campared with Soybean Meal as Partial Substitutes for Fish Meal in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss) Diets: Protein and Energy Utilization. Aquaculture, 128, 287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90318-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mukhopadhyay</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Effect of Fermentation in Apparent Total and Nutrient Digestibility of Sesame (Sesamum indicum) Seed Meal in Rohu, Labeo Roluta (Hamiltan) Fingerlings. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat</article-title><source></source><volume> 31</volume>,<fpage> 19</fpage>-<lpage>28</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez-Palacios, C.A., Cruz, R.G., Novoa, M.A.O. and Chávez-Martinez, C. (1988) The Use of Jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis Leguminosae) Meal as a Partial Substitute for Fish Meal in Diets for Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus Cichlidae). Aquaculture, 68, 165-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(88)90239-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yue, Y.R. and Zhou, Q.C. (2008) Effect of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cotton Seed Meal on Growth, Feed Utilisation and Haematological Indexes for Juvenile Hybrid Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus x O. aureus. Aquaculture, 284, 185-189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Unprasert, N.G. (1994) An Evaluation of the Use of “Ideal” Protein Concept to Estimate Essential Amino Acid Requirements of the Clarias Hybrid (Clarias macrocephalus × Clariasgariepinus). Ph.D. Dissertation, Mississippi State University, Starkville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mukhopadhyay, N. and Ray, A.K. (1999) Utilization of Copra Meal in the Formulation of Compound Dies for Rohu, Labeo rohita, Fingerlings. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 15, 127-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.1999.00132.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohanta, K.N., Mohanty, S.N., Jena, J.K. and Sahu, N.P. (2006) Apparent Protein, Lipid and Energy Digestibility Coefficients of Some Commonly Used Feed Ingredients in Formulated Pelleted Diets for Silver Barb, Puntius gonionotus.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stickney, R.R., Hardy, R.W., Koch, K., Harrold, R., Seawright, D. and Massec, K.C. (1996) The Effect of Substituting Selected Oilseed Protein Concentrates for Fishmeal in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhychus mykiss) Diets. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 27, 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00594.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.A., Nahar, N. and Kamal, M. (1997) Nutrient Digestibility Coefficient of Some Plant and Animal Proteins for Rohu (Labeo rohita). Aquaculture, 151, 37-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(96)01481-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nandeesha, M.C., Srikanth, G.K., Keshavnath, P. and Das, S.K. (1991) Protein and Fat Digestibility of Five Feed Ingredients by Indian Major Carp, Catla catla (Hamilton). In: Fish Nutrition Research in Asia, in: Proceeding of 4th Asian Fish Nutrition Workshop, Vijayawada, 3-8 September 1990, 75-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jafri, A.K. and Anwar, M.F. (1995) Protein Digestibility of Some-Low Cost Feed Stuffs in Fingerlings Indian Major Carps. Asian Fisheries Science, 8, 47-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Singh, B.N. (1992) Digestibility of Protein and Energy from Feedstuffs and Pelleted Diets in Mrigal, Cirrhinus mrigala (Ham.) and Grass Carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Val.). In: Wang, J.K. and Dehadrai, P.V., Eds., Aquaculture Research Needs for 2000 AD, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 135-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lovell, R.T. (1977) Digestibility of Nutrient in Feedstuffs of Catfish. In: Stickney, R.R. and Lovell, R.T., Eds., Nutrition and Feeding of Channel Catfish, Auburn University, Auburn, 33-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamarudin, M.S., Kalipan, K.M. and Siraj, S.S. (1989) The Digestibility of Several Feed Stuffs in Red Tilapia. Fish Nutrition Research in Asia. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Fish Nutrition Network Meeting, Bangkok, 6-10 June 1988, 118-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hossain M.A.</surname><given-names> Nahar</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> N.</surname><given-names> Kamala</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> M. and Islam</surname><given-names> M.N </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Nutrient Digestibility Coefficients of Some Plants and Animal Protein for Tilapia</article-title><source> Journal of Aquaculture in the Tropics</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 256</fpage>-<lpage>266</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jimoh, W.A., Fagbenro, O.A. and Adeparusi, E.O. (2010) Digestibility Coefficients of Processed Jackbean Meal Cannavalia ensiformis (L.) DC for Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) Diets. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2, 102-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cho, E.Y. and Slinger, S.L. (1979) Apparent Digestibility Measurement in Foodstuff for Rainbow Trout. In: Halver, J.O. and Tiews, K., Eds., World Symposium on Fin Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology, 239-247.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrew, J.W., Murray, M.W. and Davies, J.M. (1979) The Influence of Dietary Fat Levels and Environmental Temperature on Digestibility Energy and Absorbability of Animal Fat in Channel Catfish. Journal of Nutrition, 108, 749-752.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Phillip, A.M. (1972) Caloric and Energy Measurement in Fish Nutrition. Halver, J.E., Ed., Academic Press, New York and London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiessen, D.L., Campbell, G.L. and Adelizi, P.D. (2003) Digestibility and Growth Performance of Juvenile Rainbow Trouts (Oncorhynchus mykis) Fed with Pea and Canola Products. Aquaculture Nutrition, 9, 67-75.http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00203.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.51009-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbenro, O.A. (1998) SHORT COMMUNICATION Apparent Digestibility of Various Legume Seed Meals in Nile Tilapia Diets. Aquaculture International, 6, 83-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009277905114</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>