<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2014.512118</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-50718</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Mineral Concentrations and Rumen Degradability of Biodegraded &lt;i&gt;Enterolobium cyclocarpum&lt;/i&gt; (Jacq) and &lt;i&gt;Pterocarpus santalinoides&lt;/i&gt; (L’Her) with &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus niger&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>A. Ayuk</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B.</surname><given-names>I. Okon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>E.</surname><given-names>A. Iyayi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J.</surname><given-names>O. Ayuk</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Animal Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Cross River State Community and Social Development Agency, Calabar, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yinsaj@yahoo.com(JOA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1089</fpage><lpage>1096</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The effects of solid state fermentation on the mineral concentrations and in 
  <em>sacco</em> degradation characteristics of dry matter in two multipurpose tree leaves was investigated. Biodegraded 
  <em>Enterolobium cyclocarpum</em> (EC) and 
  <em>Pterocarpus santalinoides</em> (PS) leaves were previously inoculated with 
  <em>Aspergillus niger</em> and incubated at 30
  &amp;degC for five incubation periods (0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days). After each incubation period, samples were oven dried at 60
  &amp;degC, allowed to cool and ground for mineral analysis and in 
  <em>sacco</em> dry matter degradability. Three fistulated West African Dwarf (WAD) rams (
  <em>Ovis aries</em>) were then used for the dry matter degradability. Five grams of each sample was emptied into nylon bag (Polymon, Switzeland) with pore size of 4 μ and effective size of 5 cm &#215; 18 cm and incubated in the rumen of the fistulated animals for 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The results showed that the mineral contents of biodegraded EC samples were affected by incubation period. Mean values of Ca, Cu, K, Na, and Zn were significantly increased (0.05), while mean values of Fe, Mg, and Mn were first reduced before significantly increasing (0.05). However, the composition of P showed significant reduction (0.05) up to day 28 where no change was observed. Mineral concentrations in biodegraded PS were also affected by incubation periods. Values of Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Zn were significantly increased (0.05). However values of Cu, and Fe only increased after day 14, while the value of P was reduced significantly over the different incubation periods. Potential degradability (PD) for biodegraded EC was highest at day 0 (50.79%) but not significantly different from potential degradability of longer incubation periods to day 28 (48.68%). PS had higher PD than EC. In spite of high PD values, PS comparatively degraded faster than EC. Effective degradability (ED) for EC was highest for day28 (36.71%) and not significantly different from days 21 (34.83%) and 7 (35.29%) but significantly different from days 0 (31.32%) and 14 (31.75%) respectively. However, the ED for PS was highest for day 0 (31.39) samples and significantly differed from other incubation periods, further increase in period only showed lower but similar ED values for days 7 (27.52%), 14 (26.76%), 21 (27.42%) and 28 (26.86%) respectively. In this study, the continued reduction in P concentrations in both biodegraded EC and PS suggest that 
  <em>Aspergillus niger</em> has preferential demand for P and in 
  <em>sacco</em> degradation showed increase in PD and ED values for fungal biodegraded EC and reduction in PS, suggesting improved quality of EC.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Multipurpose Trees</kwd><kwd> Mineral</kwd><kwd> Rumen Degradation</kwd><kwd> Fistulated Sheep</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ruminant production in the tropics is hampered by scarcity of protein and energy rich feedstuffs especially in the dry season. This is so because tropical forages are generally of low quality and their intake by animals is usually limited by high levels of fibre and low nutrient content, particularly protein which is essential for both animal and rumen microbial growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref1">1</xref>] . The use of multipurpose trees (MPTs) as fodder for livestock is a way of making up for the nutrient limitation of the forages. It is an option for increasing the quality and availability of feed resources for livestock in the arid areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref2">2</xref>] . MPTs contain high levels of crude protein and minerals and many show high levels of digestibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref3">3</xref>] and are potential sources of cheap feed for ruminant animals, especially during dry seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref4">4</xref>] . They maintain higher protein and mineral contents during growth than do grasses, which decline rapidly in quality with progress to maturity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref5">5</xref>] . Currently small-holder farmers of Sub-Saharan African countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref6">6</xref>] are increasingly relying on various potential MPTs that can provide a green feed throughout the year which may be particularly useful as feed supplements to the typical low-quality diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref7">7</xref>] . However, many have been found to contain antinutritional factors which tend to affect both their intake and digestibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Fungal treatment has been used to improve nutritive value of antinutritional factors (ANFs) containing feeds. The solid state fermentation has been shown to improve the nutritive value and sensory values of a wide variety of legumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref9">9</xref>] . Degradation of phytic acid by Rhizopus oligosporus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref10">10</xref>] and tannins by A. niger has been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref12">12</xref>] . However, information on the mineral profiles and in sacco degradation of biodegraded products for ruminants is scarce.</p><p>At the ruminal level, optimum concentration of minerals is required for microbial growth, protein synthesis and cell wall degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref13">13</xref>] . Minerals catalyze several enzymatic processes and hormone systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref14">14</xref>] maintain acid-base balance, water balance and osmotic pressure in the blood and cerebral spinal fluids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref15">15</xref>] . However, rarely can pasture forages completely satisfy all mineral requirements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref16">16</xref>] . Tropical forage is often poor in calcium and especially phosphorus therefore care must be taken to supply the requisite amounts of these minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref17">17</xref>] . Inadequate mineral intake leads to low productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref18">18</xref>] . A knowledge of the mineral profile and effect of fermentation of MPTs becomes necessary.</p><p>Since the rumen is the primary site of digestion of forages, it is important to monitor their degradation kinetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref7">7</xref>] . The rumen degradation using the nylon bag technique is a major determinant of forage quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref19">19</xref>] . The technique is quicker and cheaper than the whole animal studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref7">7</xref>] . It is useful in screening ruminant feeds; in particular forage plants, for the proportion of rumen degradable nutrients (RDN) and undegradable dietary nutrients (UDN) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref20">20</xref>] . In this study therefore, the effects of solid state fermentation on the mineral profile and in sacco degradation characteristics of dry matter in Enterolobium cyclocarpum (EC) and Pterocarpus santalinoides (PS) were evaluated.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Location and Forage</title><p>The study was conducted at the livestock farm of the international Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Ibadan, South Western Nigeria. Biodegraded EC and PS leaves were used. The leaves were previously inoculated with A. niger and incubated at 30˚C for five periods (0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days). A. niger was originally isolated at the Department of Yam pathology, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref21">21</xref>] . After each incubation period, samples were oven dried at 60˚C, allowed to cool and ground for mineral analysis and in sacco dry matter degradability. Samples for mineral analysis were ground to pass 1mm sieve while those for dry matter degradability were ground to pass through 2.5 mm sieve.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Mineral Analysis</title><p>Analysis for Mg, Mn, Ca, Fe and Zn were determined by air acetylene flame absorption spectrophotometry on a Perkin Elmer model 703. Sodium, Potassium and Calcium were determined using the phlame photometer, while P was by use of autoanalyser 11 Technicon. All analyses were done in triplicate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Animals and Feeding</title><p>Three fistulated West African Dwarf (WAD) rams (Ovis aries) were used. Each animal was fed Guinea grass and supplemented with 2 kg wheat per day with water and salt licks provided ad libitum.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Rumen degradability of MPTs</title><p>The dry matter degradation was determined using the nylon bag technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref19">19</xref>] . Five grams of sample was emptied into nylon bag (Polymon, Switzerland) with pore size of 4 &#181; and effective size 5 cm &#215; 18 cm. The bags were incubated in the rumen for 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 incubation periods. Bags were withdrawn at the end of each incubation and washed under running water until rinse water remained clear. The zero time washing loss was estimated by washing under tap after soaking in water at 37˚C for 1 hour. After washing, bags were oven dried in forced air oven at 60˚C for 48 hr, left at room temperature for at least 2 h before weighing residue. The results of dry matter disappearance from nylon bags were fitted into the exponential formula of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref19">19</xref>] as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50718-formula303"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-3000883x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where p = degradability at time t;</p><p>a = water soluble fraction (%);</p><p>b = water insoluble but potentially degradable fraction (%);</p><p>c = rate at which b is degraded per hour (rate constant);</p><p>t = incubation time (h).</p><p>Effective degradability of dry matter was calculated by using the following equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50718-formula304"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-3000883x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k is the outflow rate (%).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Results of effects of period (0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days) of fermentation on mineral elements (Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P and Zn) were analysed as a complete randomized design using ANOVA. The degradation characteristics were analysed as a randomized complete block design with three replicates (fistulated sheep) using NONLIN procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The mineral concentrations of biodegraded EC samples were affected by incubation period and are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Mean values of Ca, Cu, K, Na and Zn were significantly increased (0.05), while mean values of Fe, Mg and Mn were first reduced (day 0) before significantly increasing (0.05). However, the composition of P showed significant reduction (0.05), up to day 28 where no change was observed. Mineral concentrations did differ appreciably from mean day 0 values for Ca (0.91%), Cu (9.04%), Fe (76.20%), K (1.16%), Mg (0.53%), Mn (81.14%), Na (53.45%), P (0.14%) and Zn (27.78%) respectively.</p><p>Mineral concentrations in biodegraded PS were also affected by incubation period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Values of Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na and Zn were significantly increased (0.05). However values of Cu and Fe only increased</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Changes in mineral composition of biodegraded EC with incubation time (%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>a</sup>Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.04<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.20<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.40<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.45<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.78<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.70<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.42<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.91<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.67<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.47<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.32<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.74<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.88b<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155.18<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.41<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.65<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195.01<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.39<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.62<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.64<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.34</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means along the same column with any identical superscript are not significant (P &gt; 0.05). (a) Ca = Calcium; K = Potassium; Mg = Magnesium; P = Phosphorus; Cu = Copper; Fe = Iron; Mn = Manganese; Na = Sodium and Zn = Zinc.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Changes in mineral composition of biodegraded PS with incubation time (%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>a</sup>Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.42<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.13<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680.9<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.60<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.98<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.14<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >845.8<sup>dc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.84<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.90<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.95<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1274.7<sup>ba</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.13<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.94<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1058.4<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.35<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.82<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1345.1<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.99<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.31<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1040.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.43</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means along the same column with any identical superscript are not significant (P &gt; 0.05). (a) Ca = Calcium; K = Potassium; Mg = Magnesium; P = Phosphorus; Cu = Copper; Fe = Iron; Mn = Manganese; Na = Sodium and Zn = Zinc.</p><p>after day 14, while the value of P was reduced significantly over the different incubation periods. Calcium concentration in PS increased by day 7 (32.56%) and by day 14 (42.38%) further percent increase was had but at day 21 (36.03) lower percentage than day 28 (41.22%).</p><p>The Ca concentration for EC at day 0 was higher than the dietary requirements of dairy cattle (0.43% - 0.60% of DM of diet) recommended by NRC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref24">24</xref>] and within 0.09% - 3.35% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref18">18</xref>] for various forages but lower than 1.01 for Ahdatoda vessica and 2.7 for Impashion bicolor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref25">25</xref>] . The P in EC was low (0.14) in comparison with the required minimum of 0.20% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref26">26</xref>] it was however within the range of 0.11 - 0.88 reported for various forages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref18">18</xref>] but higher than 0.016 in Impashion bicolor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref24">24</xref>] . The Ca to P ratio EC was about 7:1 at the brink of what ruminants can tolerate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref27">27</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref28">28</xref>] also observed wide Ca:P ratios among shrub species. The Ca in PS at day 0 were lower (0.87) than that of EC but higher than the requirement for dairy cattle (0.43 - 0.6 of DM of diet) recommended [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref24">24</xref>] . The P value (0.19) for PS however, was higher than that of EC but below required minimum of 0.20% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref26">26</xref>] . The Ca:P ratios for EC (7:1) and PS (5:1) appear to corroborate reports of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref29">29</xref>] that trees are rich in Ca and poor in P. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref4">4</xref>] also recorded Ca contents of recommended levels but lower P contents for MPTs studied.</p><p>The variations in mineral concentrations of biodegraded EC and PS reflect differing effect of incubation periods with A. niger. Both biodegraded EC and PS concentrations of Ca, K, Na, and Zn increased as incubation period was further increased. Concentration of Fe, Mg, Mn and P in the biodegraded EC reduced after seven days incubation periods. In PS, reductions were of Cu, Fe and P, as in EC reduced with further increase in incubation period. The decreased concentrations suggest that the fungus may need the elements to meet specific requirements. The increased concentrations indicate increase in the microbial populations and production of the elements. Rumen microbes have capabilities to extract and concentrate essential minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref30">30</xref>] and may be the case of the fungus used. Also fungal treatment can lead to release of locked up minerals from breakdown of cell wall components and other fibrous constituents from biodegraded materials. Fodder trees and Shrubs have always played a role in feeding Livestock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref18">18</xref>] . They are good sources of minerals for ruminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref31">31</xref>] and often much higher in mineral contents than forages. However, continued reduction of P concentrations in both biodegraded EC and PS might be limiting to both rumen microbes and the animal requirement for P. The trend suggests that A. niger has preferential demand for P. Mineral content such as sulphur and phosphorus, is one of several factors that govern ruminal microbial yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref32">32</xref>] . Studies from tropical countries have indicated that medium to high levels of production at very high feed conversion efficiencies can be achieved by ruminants on poor quality forages adequately supplemented with critical nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref33">33</xref>] . Although P in biodegraded EC and PS may not reach critical levels, the reduction may create a demand for supplementation. In addition, high Ca:P ratio reduces absorption of P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref24">24</xref>] . Therefore, P supplementation appears to be essential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref34">34</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Rumen Degradation</title><p>The dry matter degradation constants for biodegraded EC and PS are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The water soluble fraction (a) of biodegraded EC for days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 were 19.68, 26.72, 25.14, 27.19 and 28.56, respectively. The soluble but potentially degradable fractions (b) decreased after day 7 (31.11%), increase in incubation period only caused reduction in b. The rate constant (c) of biodegraded EC was highest at day 0 (50.79%) but not significantly different from potential degradability of longer incubation periods to day 28 (48.68%). Effective degradability (ED) was highest for day 28 (36.71%) and not significantly different from days 21 (34.83%) and 7 (35.71%) but significantly different from days 0 (31.32%) and 14 (31.75%) respectively.</p><p>The degradability constants for biodegraded PS differed significantly (0.05). The soluble fraction (a) at day 0 (19.71%) did not differ significantly from day 28 (19.15%) but differed significantly (0.05) from days 7 (20.86), 14 (22.35) and 21 (21.55) respectively. The insoluble but potentially degradable fraction was highest at day 0 (48.55%) and significantly (0.05) different from day 21 (14.64%) but not different from days 7 (23.31%), 14 (32. 54%) and 28 (40.64%) respectively. Rate constants (c) for biodegraded PS for day 0 (0.010573%) did not significantly (0.05) differ from days 7 (0.013612%), to 28 (0.011056%) however days 14 (0.007171%) significantly differed from day 21 (0.020637%). Potential degradability (PD) for biodegraded PS was highest at day 0 (68. 26%) and only differed significantly (0.05) from day 21 (36.19%). The effective degradability ED was also highest for day 0 (31.39) samples and significantly differed from other incubation periods, further increase in period only showed lower but similar ED values for days 7 (27.52%), 14 (26.76%), 21 (27.42%) and 28 (26.86%) respectively.</p><p>The dry matter degradability of both EC and PS was affected by length of incubation with A. niger. Mean values for potentially degraded fractions of EC were similar but significantly (0.05) different from day 0. The PD value for day 0 was high with a low ED value. Though 21 day biodegraded EC had highest PD with significantly (P &lt; 0.05) high ED, 28 day biodegraded EC had highest ED with fastest degradation rate. The slowest degradation rate was obtained with 28 days biodegraded EC but there was no difference.</p><p>Rumen degradation is useful in ranking MPTs in terms of nutritive value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref36">36</xref>] and for comparing the digestive capacities of ruminal species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref37">37</xref>] . PS has been ranked low compared to other MPTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref39">39</xref>] . In this study, PS had higher PD than EC. The insoluble but degradable fraction b was 48.55% in PS and 31.11% in EC leaves; similarly, the greatest and least values of PD were recorded for PS (68.26%) and EC (50.79%), respectively. Biodegradation resulted in lowering the PD values. 21 day biodegraded PS with significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lowest PD degraded least. In spite of the high PD values, PS comparatively degraded faster than EC. The degradability of PS was higher than range 29% to 34 % reported for Calliandra calothrysus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref40">40</xref>] but similar to those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref20">20</xref>] for four MPTs foliage using WAD goats.</p><p>The degradability constants varied appreciably. Variabilities in rumen degradability constants have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref41">41</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref43">43</xref>] . The possible reason could be linked to variation in plant species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref7">7</xref>] , their chemical composition and cell wall characteristics and their effects on rumen ecology in various ruminant species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Dry matter degradation constants for biodegraded substrate of EC and PS</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Time (days)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>a</sup>A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ED</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ED</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.68<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.11<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020585<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.79<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.32<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.71<sup>cb</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.55<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010573<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.39<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.72<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020648<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.29<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.31<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013612<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.20<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.52<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.54<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014384<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.75<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.35<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.54<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007171<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.61<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.76<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.19<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.10<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014296<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.29<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.83<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.55<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020637<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.19<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.42<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.56<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.04<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023868<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.71<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.15<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.46<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011056<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.86<sup>b</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means along the same column with any identical superscript are not significant (P &gt; 0.05). A = water soluble fraction (%); B = water insoluble fraction (%); C = rate at which b is degraded (rate constant); PD = potential degradability (%) and ED = effective degradability (%).</p><p>Cellulose in plants is composed of amorphous and crystalline structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref45">45</xref>] , the latter more resistant to microbial degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref46">46</xref>] . Enzymes secreted by aerobic and anaerobic fungi are capable of solubilising crystalline cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref47">47</xref>] . However, in fungal decayed material, where part of the lignin was already removed by the fungi, the limitation in the digestion of structural carbohydrates may be due to other factors such as crystallinity of cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref47">47</xref>] . Variation in rumen degradation characteristics may also be attributable to cell wall polysaccharide configuration in the different species and their effect on rumen microbial attachment and colonization of digesta particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>Degradation constants as measured by the in sacco nylon bag technique are strongly related to digestible DM intake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref49">49</xref>] . Thus, interspecies variations in OM degradability could result in different intakes of the plants when given as sole diets to animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50718-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this study degradation showed improvements in PD and ED values of fungal biodegraded EC and reduction in PS, suggesting improved quality of EC. However, animal output is a better reflection of forage quality. Further research on animal performance was therefore necessary to determine whether the high PD and ED values in EC could be translated into improved animal output.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.50718-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jetama, T., Abdullah, N., Hallim, R.A., Jalaludin, S. and Ho, Y.W. (2000) Effects of Energy and Protein Supplementation on Microbial-Synthesis and Allanton Excretion in Sheep Fed Guinea Grass. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 84, 167-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00119-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amira, C., Louisa, G., Lyas, B., Samir, M., Mohamed, L.A., Morère, L.M. and Hacène, B. (2014) Effects of Secondary Compounds from Cactus and Acacias Trees on Rumen Microbial Profile Changes Performed by Real-Time PCR. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2, 660-671.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azim, A., Ghazanfar, S., Latif, A. and Nadeem, M.A. (2011) Nutritional Evaluation of Some Top Fodder Tree Leaves and Shrubs of District Chakwal, Pakistan in Relation to Ruminant Requirements. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10, 54-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.54.59</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arigbede, O.M., Tan, Z.L., Anele, U.Y., Sun, Z.H., Tang, S. X., Han, X.F., Zhou, C.S and Zeng, B. (2012) Effects of Age and Species on Agronomic Performance, Chemical Composition and in Vitro Gas Production of Some Tropical Multipurpose Tree Species. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 150, 725 737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000184</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aganga, A.A and Tshwenyane, S.O. (2003) Feeding Values and Anti-Nutritive Factors of Forage Tree Legumes. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2, 170-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2003.170.177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aremu, A.T. and Onadeko, S.A. (2008) Nutritional Ecology of African Buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus). International Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 281-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2008.281.286</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belachew, Z., Yisehak, K., Taye, T. and Janssens, G.P.J. (2013) Chemical Composition and in Sacco Ruminal Degradation of Tropical Trees Rich in Condensed Tannins. Czechoslovakia Journal of Animal Science, 58, 176-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Babayemi</surname><given-names> O.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Antinutritional Factors, Nutritive Value and in Vitro Gas Production of Folliage and Fruit of Enterolobium cyclocarpum</article-title><source> World Journal of Zoology</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 113</fpage>-<lpage>117</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nair, V. and Duvjak, Z. (1991) Phytic Acid Content Reduction in Canola Meal by Various Microorganisms in a Solid State Fermentation Process. Acta Biotechnology, 11, 211-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/abio.370110306</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Belewu</surname><given-names> M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Replacement of Fungus Treated Jatropha curcas Kernel Meal in the Diet of Rat</article-title><source> Green Farming Journal</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 154</fpage>-<lpage>157</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Idowu, O.J., Arigbede, O.M., Dele, P.A., Olanite, J.A., Adelusi, O.O., Ojo, V.O.A. and Sunmola, A.S. (2013) Nutrient Intake, Performance and Nitrogen Balance of West African Dwarf Sheep Fed Graded Levels of Toasted Enterolobium cyclocarpum Seeds as Supplement for Panicum maximum. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16, 1806-1810.http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.1806.1810</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayuk, A.A., Iyayi, E.A., Okon, B.I. and Ayuk, J.O. (2014) Growth Performance of West African Dwarf (WAD) Sheep Fed Biodegraded Enterolobium cyclocarpum Based Diets. Agricultural Sciences, 5, 710-715.http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.58074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pouli, J.R., Jung, G.A. and Reid, R.L. (1991) Effects of Nitrogen and Sulphuron Digestion and Nutritive Quality of Warm-Season Grass Hays for Cattle and Sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 843-852.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Underwood, E.J. and Suttle, N.F. (1999) The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. 3rd Edition, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, 283-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851991283.0283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.M.H. and Chaudhry, A.S. (2011) A Comparative Study of Low and High Quality Forages for Chemical Composition and in Vitro Degradability. The Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences, 21, 715-723.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McDowell, L.R., Conrad, J.H. and Hembry, F.G. (1993) Mineral for Grazing Ruminants in Tropical Regions. University of Florida, Gainesville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Charray, J., Humbert, J.M. and Levif, J. (1992) Manual of Sheep Production in the Humid Tropics of Africa. CAB International Wallingford, Oxon.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghazanfar, S., Latif, A., Mirza, I.H. and Nadeem, M.A. (2011) Macro-Minerals Concentrations of Major Fodder Tree Leaves and Shrubs of District Chakwal, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10, 480-484.http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.480.484</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Oslashrskov, E.R. and McDonald, I. (1979) The Estimation of Protein Digestibility in the Rumen from Incubation Measurements Weighted According to Rate of Passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 92, 499-503.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arigbede, O.M., Bamikole, M.A., Olanite, J.A., Jolaosho, A.E. and Onafide, S.O. (2002) Seasonal Degradability of Dry Matter, Organic Matter and Crude Protein in Some Multipurpose Tree Species by West African Dwarf Goats. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of Nigerian Society of Animal Production, Akure, 17-21 March 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayuk, A.A., Iyayi, E.A., Okon, B.I., Ayuk, J.O. and Jang, E. (2014) Biodegradation of Antinutritional Factors in Whole Leaves of Enterolobium cyclocarpum by Aspergillus niger Using Solid State Fermentation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6, 188-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Association of Official Analytical Chemists: AOAC (1990) Methods of Analysis. 15th Editon, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS (1988) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.03. Statistical Analytical Systems Institute, Cary.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Seventh Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahim, I., Sultan, J.I., Sharif, M. and Bilal, M.Q. (2013) Chemical Composition, Mineral Profile, Palatabiltiy and in Vitro Digestibility of Shrubs. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23, 45-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">McDowell, L., Conrad, J.H. and Ellis, G.L. (1984) Mineral Deficiencies and Imbalances and Their Diagnosis. In: Gilchrist, F.M.C. and Mackie, R.I., Eds., Herbivore Nutrition in Subtropics and Tropics, Graighall, South Africa, The Science Press, Johannesburg, 67-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (1985) Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 6th Revised Edition, National Academy Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rogosic, J., Pfister, J.A., Provenza, F.D. and Grbesa, D. (2006) Sheep and Goat Preference for and Nutritional Value of Mediterranean Maquis Shrubs. Small Ruminant Research, 64, 169-179.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.04.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saha, S.C. and Gupta, B.N. (1987) Tree Leaves as Feed for Dairy Cattle in India. India Dairyman, 39, 489-492.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leng, R.A. (1990) Factors Affecting Utilization of Poor Quality Forages by Ruminants Particularly under Tropical Conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews, 3, 277-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/NRR19900016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, K., Ashraf, M., Khan, Z. and Valeem, E.E. (2008) Evaluation of Macro-Mineral Concentrations of Forages in Relation to Ruminant’s Requirements: A Case Study in Soon Valley, Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40, 295-299.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karunananda, K. and Varga, G.A. (1996) Colonization of Rice Straw by White Rot Fungi (Cyanthus stercoreous): Effect on Ruminal Fermentation Pattern, Nitrogen Metabolism, and Fiber Utilization during Continous Culture. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 61, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00958-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Preston, I.R. and Leng, R.A. (1987) Matching Ruminant Production Systems with Available Resources in the Tropics and Subtropcis. Penambul Books, Armidale.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Breves, G. and Schr&amp;oumlder, B. (1991) Comparative Aspects of Gastrointestinal Phosphorus Metabolism. Nutrition Research Reviews, 4, 125-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/NRR19910011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siaw, D.E.K.A., Osuji, P.O. and Nsahlai, I.V. (1993) Evaluation of Multipurpose Tree Germplasm: The Use of Gas Production and Rumen Degradation Characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Science, 130, 319-330.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600076486</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larbi, A., Kurdi, I.O., Said, A.N. and Hassan, J. (1994) In Situ Rumen Evaluation of Erythrina Provenances. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Migongo-Barke, W. (1992) Rumen Dry Matter Digestive Efficiency of Camels, Cattles, Sheep and Goats in the Semi Arid Environment in Eastern Africa. In: Stares, J.W.S., Said, A.N. and Kategile, Eds., The Complementarities of Feed Resources for Animal Production in Africa, Proceedings of the Joint Feed Resources Network Workshop Gaborone, Botswana, 4-8 March 1991, 27-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larbi, A., Smith, J.W., Raji, A.M., Kurdi, I.O., Adekunle, I.D. and Ladipo, D.O. (1997) Seasonal Dynamics in Dry Matter Degradation of Browse Cattle, Sheep, and Goats. Small Ruminants Research, 25, 129-140.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00971-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larbi, A., Smith, J.W., Kurdi, I.O., Adekunle, I.O., Raji, A.M. and Ladipo, D.O. (1998) Chemical Composition, Rumen Degradation and Gas Production Characteristics of Some Multipurpose Fodder Tree Shrubs during Wet and Dry Seasons in the Humid Tropics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 72, 81-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00170-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Perera, A.N.F., Perera, E.R.K. and Gunansena (1996) Nutritive Value and Degradation Characteristics of Calliandra calothyrsus Provenances. In: Evans, D.D., Ed., International Workshop on the Genus Calliandra, Winrock International, Monilton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dzowela, B.H., Hove, L., Topps, J.H. and Mafongoya, P.L. (1995) Nutritional and Anti Nutritional Characters and Rumen Degradability of Dry Matter and Nitrogen for Some Multipurpose Tree Species with Potential for Agroforestry in Zimbabwe. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55, 207-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00803-U</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oji, U.I., Larbi, A. and Akele, S.A. (2002) Nutritional Potentials of Common Shrubs of the Niger Delta as Ruminant Feed. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Society of Animal Production, Akure, 17-21 March 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngodigha, E.M. and Anyanwu, N.J. (2009) Fodder Potential Ranking of Selected Multi-Purpose Trees and Shrubs through Degradation Studies with Rumen Fistulated N’dama Steers. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8, 1233-1236.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, J.W., Larbi, M.A., Jabbar, M.A. and Akinlade, J. (1995) Rumen Degradation in Sheep, Goats and Cattle and Voluntary Intake by Sheep of Four Browse Species. Agroforestry Systems, 32, 277-286.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00711715</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, Y.W. (1978) Microbial Utilization of Straw (a Review). Advances in Applied Microbiology, 23, 119-153.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70066-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karunananda, K., Varga, G.A., Akin, D.E. and Royse, D.J. (1995) Botanical Fractions of Rice Straw Colonized by White Rot Fungi: Changes in Chemical Composition and Structure. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55, 179-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00805-W</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wood, T.M., McCrae, S.I., Wilson, I.A., Bhat, K.M. and Gow, L.A. (1988) Aerobic and Anaerobic Fungal Celluloses, with Special Reference to Their Mode of Attack on Crystalline Cellulose. In: Hubert, J.P., Begun and Millet, Eds., Biochemistry and Cellulose Degradation, Academic Press, New York, 207-217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, K.J., Stewart, C.S., Dinsdale, D. and Costerton, J.W. (1984) Electron Microscopy of Bacteria Involved in the Digestion of Plant Cell Walls. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 10, 93-120.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(84)90002-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50718-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kibbon, A. and &amp;Oslashrskov, E.R. (1993) The Use of Degradability Characteristics of Browse Plants to Predict Intake and Digestibility by Goats. Animal Science, 57, 247-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100006851</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>