<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2014.517262</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-50601</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Recursive Approach to the Kauffman Bracket
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>bdul</surname><given-names>Rauf Nizami</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mobeen</surname><given-names>Munir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Umer</surname><given-names>Saleem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ansa</surname><given-names>Ramzan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>arnizami@ue.edu.pk(BRN)</email>;<email>mobeenmunir@gmail.com(MM)</email>;<email>umerlinks@hotmail.com(US)</email>;<email>ansaramzan@yahoo.com(AR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>10</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>17</issue><fpage>2746</fpage><lpage>2755</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  We introduce a simple recursive relation and give an explicit formula of the Kauffman bracket of two-strand braid link 
  <img src="Edit_07f8f7c4-c2de-4f23-a4d8-d673bba4c2da.bmp" alt="" />. Then, we give general formulas of the bracket of the sequence of links of three-strand braids 
  <img src="Edit_2c59ca47-6b7d-4517-9bbe-4be8c4b1f9d5.bmp" alt="" />. Finally, we give an interesting result that the Kauffman bracket of the three-strand braid link 
  <img src="Edit_5606baad-4fe4-4154-9ce3-5fe380f842a8.bmp" alt="" />is actually the product of the brackets of the two-strand braid links 
  <img src="Edit_f25e46f6-f5b8-4c41-a6bb-5ba2653aa604.bmp" alt="" style="white-space:normal;" />and 
  <img src="Edit_18ab8b04-34ea-4a45-88ef-9b84d9954969.bmp" alt="" /> . Moreover, a recursive relation for 
  <img src="Edit_9eb7a3c9-cf50-4409-9f4c-1d5614faa4ba.bmp" alt="" /> is also given.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Recursive Relation</kwd><kwd> Kauffman Bracket</kwd><kwd> Braid Link</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Kauffman bracket polynomial was introduced by L. H. Kauffman in 1987 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref1">1</xref>] in concern with link invariants. The bracket polynomial soon became popular due to its connections with the Jones polynomial, dichromatic polynomial, and the Potts model. While the HOMPLY polynomial and the bracket polynomial are distinct with different topological properties, there is a very beautiful relationship between them due to F. Jaeger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref2">2</xref>] , and it is also observed in a special case by Reshetikhin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The Kauffman bracket (polynomial) is actually not a link invariant because it is not invariant under the first Reidemeister move. However, it has many applications and it can be extended to a popular link invariant, the Jones polynomial. In the present work we shall confine ourselves to the Kauffman bracket to avoid this work from unnecessary length and to leave it for applications.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we shall give the basic ideas about knots, braids, and the Kauffman bracket. In Section 3 we shall present the main results.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Basic Notions</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Links</title><p>A link is a disjoint union of circles embedded in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A one-component link is called a knot. Links are usually studied via projecting them on a plan; a projection with extra information of overcrossing and undercrossing is called the link diagram.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula94"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Two links are isotopic if and only if one of them can be transformed to the other by a diffeomorphism of the ambient space onto itself. A fundamental result by Reidemeister [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref4">4</xref>] about the isotopic link diagrams is: Two unoriented links <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are equivalent if and only if a diagram of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be transformed into a diagram of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by a finite sequence of ambient isotopies of the plane and the local (Reidemeister) moves of the following three types:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula95"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The set of all links that are equivalent to a link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called a class of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By a link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we shall always mean the class of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The main question of knot theory is Which two links are equivalent and which are not? To address this question one needs a knot invariant, a function that gives one value on all links that belong to a single class and gives different values (but not always) on knots that belong to different classes. The present work is basically concerned with this question.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Braids</title><p>Braids were first studied by Emil Artin in 1925 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref6">6</xref>] , which now play an important role in knot theory, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref7">7</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref9">9</xref>] for detail.</p><p>An n-strand <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a set of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> non intersecting smooth paths connecting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> points on a horizontal plane to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> points exactly below them on another horizontal plane in an arbitrary order. The smooth paths are called strands of the braid.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula96"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of two n-strand braids is defined by putting the braid <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> above the braid <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and then gluing their common end points.</p><p>A braid with only one crossing is called elementary braid. The ith elementary braid <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> strands is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula97"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A useful property of elementary braids is that every braid can be written as a product of elementary braids. For instance, the above 2-strand braid is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The closure of a braid <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> obtained by connecting the lower ends of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the corresponding upper ends.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula98"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>An important result by Alexander [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref10">10</xref>] connecting knots and braids is: Each link can be represented as the closure of a braid. This result motivated knot theorists to study braids to solve problems of knot theory.</p><p>Remark 2.1 In the last section, all the concerned links will be closures of products of elementary braids.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. The Kauffman Bracket</title><p>Before the definition it is better to understand the two types of splitting of a crossing, the A-type and the B-type splittings:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula99"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the following, the symbols <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represent respectively the unknot and the disconnected sum.</p><p>Definition 2.2 The Kauffman bracket is the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by the axioms:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula100"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula101"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula102"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are three links which are isotopic everywhere except at one crossing where the look as in the figure:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula103"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proposition 2.3 The Kauffman polynomial is invariant under second and third Reidemeister moves but not under the first Reidemeister move [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50601-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Main Results</title><p>In this section we shall introduce a recursive relation for the Kauffman bracket, shall give an explicit formula of</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and shall express <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the product of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>First of all we give the Kauffman bracket of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-twist unknot<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula104"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 3.1 The Kauffman bracket of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-twist unknot is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula105"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><p>The case <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> holds by definition as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the unknot without any crossings. Now, with the assumption that the result holds for an arbitrary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula106"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 3.2 (A recursive relation) The following relation holds for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula107"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it using directly the definition and Lemma 3.1:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula108"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From this recursive relation, we get the explicit formula for the 2-strand braid link<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><p>Proposition 3.3 The Kauffman bracket of the link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula109"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula110"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which satisfies the recursive relation.</p><p>With the assumption that the relation holds for an arbitrary n, we, using Theorem 3.2, get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula111"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This completes the proof. ,</p><p>In the following we give the Kauffman bracket polynomial of the closure of the braid <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (n factors); this sequence contains the powers of the Garside element<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proposition 3.4 The Kauffman bracket of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the recurrence relations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula112"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula113"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula114"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula115"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula116"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula117"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Simply, apply the definition for different values of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and write recursively each next bracket in terms of the previous one. ,</p><p>Lemma 3.5 The Kauffman brackets for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula118"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula119"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula120"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula121"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula122"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula123"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. The proofs of first three cases are given (proofs of remaining cases are similar):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula124"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 3.6 For any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the Kauffman bracket of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula125"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The case <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is covered by Lemma 3.5, and the inductive step can be checked with Proposition 3.4.</p><p>For instance,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula126"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In connected sum <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the braid link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the trivial knot <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has the diagram:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula127"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 3.7</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula128"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><p>For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula129"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, with the assumption that the result holds for an arbitrary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula130"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>as required. ,</p><p>The following result confirms that the Kauffman bracket of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is actually the product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Theorem 3.8 For any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula131"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula132"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Suppose the result holds for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, that is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Now, using Lemma 3.7, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula133"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This completes the proof. ,</p><p>Corollary 3.9</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula134"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. It is obvious: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Corollary 3.10</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula135"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula136"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. The result follows immediately from Theorem 3.8 as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and span <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> ,</p><p>For the following, let us fix the notation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the link with the understanding that the link contains a, b,</p><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> crossings of type<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively, and that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula137"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proposition 3.11 The Kauffman bracket of the link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula138"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><p>For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula139"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, with the assumption that the result holds for an arbitrary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula140"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula141"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>as required. ,</p><p>Proposition 3.12 The Kauffman bracket of the link <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula142"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We prove it by induction on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><p>For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula143"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, with the assumption that the result holds for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula144"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.50601-formula145"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-7402327x146.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>as was required. ,</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.50601-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kauffman, L.H. (1987) State Models and the Jones Polynomial. Topology, 26, 395-407.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(87)90009-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jaeger</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1990</year>)<article-title>A Combinatorial Model for the Homy Polynomial</article-title><source> European Journal of Combinatorics</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 549</fpage>-<lpage>555</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reshetikhin, N.Y. (1988) Quantized Universal Enveloping Algebras, the Yang-Baxter Equation and Invariants of Links, I and II. LOMI Reprints E-4-87 and E-17-87, Steklov Institute, Leningrad, USSR.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reidemeister, K. (1948) Knot Theory. Chelsea Publ and Co., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Artin, E. (1925) Theorie der Z&amp;#214; pfe. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universit&amp;#228;t Hamburg, 4, 27-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02950718</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Artin, E. (1947) Theory of Braids. Annals of Mathematics, 48, 101-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1969218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Birman, J.S. (1974) Braids, Links, and Mapping Class Groups. Princeton University Press, Princeton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manturov, V.O. (2004) Knot Theory. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203402849</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murasugi, K. (1996) Knot Theory and Its Applications. Birkh&amp;#228;User, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1923</year>)<article-title>Topological Invariants of Knots and Links</article-title><source> Transactions of the American Mathematical Society</source><volume> 20</volume>,<fpage> 275</fpage>-<lpage>306</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50601-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, C.C. (1994) The Knot Book. W H Freeman and Company, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>