<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJIBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Industrial and Business Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5167</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajibm.2014.47044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJIBM-48065</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A Monte Carlo Based Robustness Optimization Method in New Product Design Process: A Case Study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jianguo</surname><given-names>Che</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jing</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kai</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Industrial Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>cjg7705@nankai.edu.cn(JC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>360</fpage><lpage>369</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	Monte Carlo
method can analyze, solve and optimize many mathematical or physical problems through
generating a large number of statistical random samples to simulating stochastic
events. It also can be used to remarkably improve design quality of new product.
In new product design process, setting distribution characteristics of the design
variables is vital to product quality and production robustness. Firstly, response
surface model between output characteristics and design variables in new product
design is proposed, and the distribution characteristics of design variables and
response output are analyzed; then position error model of response output and standard
value and allowed error maximum is presented; and then the differences of position
error model and allowed error maximum are count, and reliability ratio is built
and calculated, and design robustness of the new product is increased by adjusting
the precision value of random design variables in Monte Carlo experiments. Finally,
a case is brought forward to verify the validity of the method.
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Monte Carlo Simulation</kwd><kwd> Robustness Optimization</kwd><kwd> New Product Design</kwd><kwd> Process Improvement</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Monte Carlo Method</title><p>Monte Carlo method is a computer-based simulation or experiment method. It approximately simulates and solves mathematical or physical stochastic problem with statistical random sampling. Compared with traditional algebraic method, due to their reliance on repeated computation of random or pseudo-random numbers, Monte Carlo method can apply Normal distribution, Exponential distribution, Weibull distribution etc. to model phenomena with significant uncertainty in inputs when it is unfeasible or impossible to compute an exact result with a deterministic algorithm, and does not need to know parameter’s distribution type and probability parameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref5">5</xref>] . In new product design, usually design parameter is a random variable that follows a probability distribution. Design parameter is a key impact factor to design robustness, and distribution of these design parameters determines greatly robustness of output response. It is not reliable to optimize this product design problem using traditional deterministic method. How to find the optimum value of these design parameters is an important problem to improve the design robustness of new product. Here, we propose a robustness optimization method of new product based on Monte Carlo simulation.</p><p>Procedures are as followed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref6">6</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref10">10</xref>] :</p><p>1) To analyze the problem existing in new product design, and define the relationship between design variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\6d1cc58f-2fd1-4437-8fac-44f8f7c14450.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and response output as a response surface model<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\c84a4907-7542-4a9d-9402-7a7eda6dc087.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>2) To analyze design variables’ distribution types and define design variables’ distribution characteristics, such as mean and standard deviation, etc.;</p><p>3) To sample from populations of random design variables X, and get the sample<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\df20149d-5705-4275-a70e-d59048539ca2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>4) To bring sample <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\8e5f35df-6e66-4207-a057-9c348ea98470.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into position error model between response surface model and standard value, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\397fe614-2893-45f1-b5b9-d4b7a7b3e6d4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then get a r position error sample and compose an experiment</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\a89ced17-32f8-440a-be44-5a7124bdfbc5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b399b5e9-2096-4c77-b113-eec93526d15f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is response output,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\5b0e7849-fc39-452b-8cad-81e82b5da99c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>);</p><p>5) To check if it meets<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\ab8b67f0-83c3-4c44-9e7e-0110cf7219e1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b37f3cd9-1b6b-4aec-abca-f00a88c20c34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is allowed error maximum.</p><p>6) To repeat step 2) to 5) by k times, and calculate the number of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\c1e1ceb5-c1fc-4a6a-81fb-3727b032da68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in all independent samples<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\60763911-04aa-4f23-be4a-14301f9bf2ee.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b5ff1344-b590-4acd-917a-cbe5bd0407ad.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\c02f37ff-7ae2-4bd3-b63c-2c3409048ad8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the number of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\9f409995-2bd0-479e-b8d3-7958416992d9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\d4fbb172-bfea-4238-9877-07b94bd1097c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>7) To calculate reliability ratio<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\7eea2d90-c9a7-4d9a-b513-92a2bbc6b97e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\a9d6096a-4d29-4fd8-9881-8805ebc45157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\2269d458-bc12-42b5-b04f-a40e4f1560ea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is acceptable reliability), then process or product is robust, otherwise we need to modify the precision value of random design variables to enhance reliability ratio and robustness of the manufacture process, then the manufacture process is optimized.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Case Study</title><p>Considering design of a pressure container, according to mechanics of materials, the pressure container’s axial</p><p>stress is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\6458e73e-d1d7-4928-8d00-b112a81997b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, hoop stress is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\966acb3b-a3ac-428c-914e-438afef7e9d5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\48ef3131-88f1-40ab-80f4-6d79afc996e7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is internal pressure of container; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\1cf2dced-d3e8-40c9-8cde-6fa0a2121f0e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is wall</p><p>thickness of container; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\eda50efe-0a01-45e7-88b3-d671b0ffc16e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is internal radius of container; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\87000091-013f-4054-b4ba-e70c6c85a606.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is half height of container. Material of container is 15 MnV. Through observation of experiment, we defined the design variables and their distribution characteristics as followed: internal work pressure of container <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\a469221b-9145-4eda-9438-58cee163e9c7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follows lognormal distribution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\5cb71ab8-4f94-4c58-8cbd-12bfb06627fa.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>the tolerance of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\120e6a76-bb14-4e6f-892e-33f8b6970058.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is (10, 20), the material strength limit <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\8ac4a0d7-80f6-4856-af4f-f71fd10d8e1f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follows lognormal distribution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\fea6ad7b-462c-4163-94d9-362978859164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>the tolerance of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\3637c1d8-15ca-4e12-a8e9-93e6845d7e6f.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is (340, 420), wall thickness of container <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\65f815c5-b8b3-45cb-81eb-3162e5154770.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follows normal distribution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\4464a72d-22bc-4867-9791-733e95dea60a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>the tolerance of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\4a5734cc-7984-44cc-9959-88823d34889d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is (1.5, 4.5), internal radius of container R follows normal distribution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\93dbbf03-d88b-4857-ae5a-ba5a4c3adf79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>the tolerance of R is (50, 100), half height of container H follows normal distribution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\030248d7-1d4f-437b-9d73-e59acda11880.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the to-</p><p>lerance of H is (130, 210). Our objective is to maximize container’s volume under 95% failure probability (con-</p><p>fidence level) of strength and container size falling Interval<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b3f00eda-d288-4d1d-b3e8-dc4eb594bfe1.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>As known, our objective function is volume maximum of the pressure container, that is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48065-formula1"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\665c2587-21d6-42b5-ba0f-c388362f8bfa.png"/></disp-formula><p>Constraints are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48065-formula2"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\4a7302b9-4826-4e41-be3d-78e2746cb9f3.png"/></disp-formula><p>Firstly we established response surface model of response variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\555d7d42-f55a-49a6-b4e5-fba4c692229e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> concerned pressure container and constraints condition, and run Monte Carlo experiment 3000 times using Crystal Ball 7. According to Anderson-Darling testing, Chi-Square testing and K-S testing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref11">11</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref13">13</xref>] , we can fit the probability distribution type of all four response variables as Normal distribution, Gamma distribution, Gamma distribution and Beta distribution, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Then we get probability distribution and cumulative probability distribution of response variable and constraints as showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>1) Robust analysis</title><p>We can know from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> that probability which product design met constraint g<sub>1</sub> is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\3c550733-13fc-4e1c-9aad-ffe8ddbc70b4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and probability which product design met constraint g<sub>2</sub> is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\f67b7b76-29e1-42eb-a99b-544d6931f69e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and probability which product design met constraint g<sub>3</sub> is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\3503d7b3-3471-4be3-8409-8266a94d2276.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> under current design variables value. That is,</p><p>wave range of constraints both g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>2</sub> go beyond their allowed range. According to requirements, current response output value is not robust and need to improve product design level.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2) Sensitivity analysis</title><p>We can know from Sensitivity Analysis of Response Variables and Constraints in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> that the significant impact factors of volume function f of pressure container are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\355e35c1-54a4-45a0-bb56-28ae0959ae3a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (positive correlation) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\75159b37-1062-4c74-b5ad-0164b4e01c66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (positive correlation) in order; the significant impact factors of constraint <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b5603e5a-0099-437b-9511-e7bbbc16993a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\275e2aac-b474-403e-ac8d-427c61156aef.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (positive correlation), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\a90b69fd-6a8d-4ed4-b448-43a80d33c822.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(negative correlation) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\216f1456-7dc4-485e-adb9-ceecf243e600.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (negative correlation) in order; the significant impact factors of constraint <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\674cbe12-51f5-42fd-8431-8f3530abd34b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b9f2b226-29fd-4e11-aec4-c3e1cffd914c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (positive correlation), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\4d06e878-7d67-49b2-8928-303ecc08fc21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(negative correlation) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\d52277e0-78df-49f3-ae3b-58fa6f447ed9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (negative correlation) in order; the significant impact factors of constraint <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\548ce03f-e2bd-47dc-8b74-44ee16702549.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\ad97ca0b-bce9-4833-9826-42991f16f9c4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (positive correlation) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\c159b56b-28d2-4d45-9e55-49ef82a0f2e9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (negative correlation) in order.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>3) Modification of design variables precision</title><p>According to relationships between design variables and response output variable, and contributions to variance view from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, we modified parameter values of the design variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\e555198e-e62c-4edc-af24-e511e4a3f4a5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to  <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\fbf730e0-5edb-4544-8422-f9f48c3540a0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\7db39ea5-001a-45c5-a2d2-d2fb84190879.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\521554f5-b949-4209-a4aa-2fc2a4bd10cf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b24c8554-67c2-4b10-a57f-efcfb7ec1f7c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\060ef3be-bbe5-4924-91dc-4e192de7850d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and get the corresponding probability distribution and cumulative probability distribution as followed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>After Modification of design variables precision, we analyze robustness of response variable and constraints</p><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Analysis of response variables’ distribution characteristics</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Median</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Skewness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Kurtosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ceff. of variability</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Distribution type</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8568233.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8568233.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >534933.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0624</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >g<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1522.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1511.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamma</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >g<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4748</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−216.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamma</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >g<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beta</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p> Pressure container chart</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\08ce098a-7869-48a3-81b5-786b41c498d5.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig2"><caption><title>Figure 2</title><p> Probability distribution and cumulative probability distribution of response variable and constraints</p></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\d392ab3c-4edb-4d1b-bb2c-ce1ce31282aa.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\05c51dba-8dfa-4f7d-9876-4a75147fbd41.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\48bad911-4de0-4506-9bcf-450d97a5a059.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_4"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\fe01187b-0925-40b4-a2da-1638f1a054f4.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig3"><caption><title>Figure 3</title><p> Sensitivity analysis of response variables and constraints</p></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\2cd74de8-8384-45b6-aa90-bc9224ce4536.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\cc5fbb25-b588-4299-a1d6-954afa3d081a.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\32f29e22-ccd6-4995-891e-6128d9d309e5.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_4"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\a60a5b38-3680-4f74-b463-6488bfb9ca4b.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>again, and get the probability that product design met constraints g<sub>1</sub> is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\53164ace-61e0-4e27-b63d-b0662448bb86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the probability that product design met constraints g<sub>2</sub> is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\16da8a8b-a656-4e21-b323-9d4e75f5e07a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the probability that product design met constraints g<sub>3</sub> is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\af0a3107-f9f3-4275-8df0-c848eff13483.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which reached product design requirements, that is, pressure con-</p><p>tainer is robust enough, and pass percentage of pressure container has been enhanced greatly. And the maximum volume of container is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\a59801b5-677a-4d3c-9a4d-413cb7319ea3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, product robustness has been greatly improved. Meanwhile, we knew from sensitivity analysis of response variables in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> that we should keep monitoring the fluctuation of the significant impact factors of response variables and constraints to hold robustness of pressure container.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>4) Design optimization</title><p>Now we further optimize the pressure container to enhance the design robustness using OptQuest optimizer. Here we create the OptQuest model and run simulation experiments 1500 times according to distribution characteristics of design variables and constraints condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref4">4</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48065-ref6">6</xref>] , and get the optimum of design variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\eba26ba2-e518-428b-b04f-f940d87ba968.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\4643825b-ee86-42f6-9438-47ee62f2bd82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, then the probabil-</p><p>ity that product design met constraints g<sub>1</sub> are<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\8ecf80d6-d39d-43de-a6b9-db750d4c164b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the probability that product design met constraints g<sub>2</sub> was<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\de68abb5-078c-4458-bb4c-9e196e293010.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the probability that product design met constraints g<sub>3</sub> is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\fb7441a7-2ef2-4879-9f1b-669e455655b7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, and the maximum volume of container is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\6dd7862f-1ef4-4674-a20d-c42d9102db8e.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></p><p>showed, so design robustness of pressure container has been further improved than that of last time.</p><fig-group id="fig4"><caption><title>Figure 4</title><p> Probability distribution and cumulative probability distribution of response variable and constraints after modification of parameter precision</p></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\50e91802-eb6d-4af4-9c8a-f7e365ed6705.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\cc1df629-40b8-420b-adbe-d6b73d97bb6f.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\160a54cc-4e70-419b-b977-a4122b65de7d.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_4"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\7c43ebe6-659e-4467-80b9-fffbcc7f893a.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig5"><caption><title>Figure 5</title><p> Probability distribution and cumulative probability distribution of response variable and constraints after optimization after OptQuest optimization</p></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\b41be0f9-a3cc-48c8-8789-893e6720adce.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\08ba658d-1b59-42ff-aeae-b24e79c89c48.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_3"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\0b09726d-abde-4d61-b1f0-5d353412f046.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_4"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\648087e5-afa9-484a-8b78-00b6adc9e1d1.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Optimum design settings of pressure container with OptQuest</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Status</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Time Remaining: 00 Simulation:1245</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximize  objective mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Requirement  g<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Requirement  g<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Requirement g<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5380E+06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.8506</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5390E+06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65588</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.4806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.772</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5416E+06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.4676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >410.204</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.5969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.661</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5426E+06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.4423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412.131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.8756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Best:38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5532E+06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.1782</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395.177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173.633</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p> Optimum design performance gragh of pressure container with OptQuest</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-2120396x\83d4f0df-1152-4d0f-ab04-996ce2a7076b.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusion</title><p>When random changes exist in design variables, traditional determined optimization method cannot guarantee robustness of product and process design to the extent. While Monte Carlo method can be used to precision control and optimization in product and process design, which can avoid increasing cost due to duplicate experi- ments and excessive design precision, as well as low pass percentage due to deficient design precision. In robust analysis and design, Monte Carlo method also can study on change of response model of product and process brought by modification of design variables, get probability distribution and statistical parameters’ values of response variables, further improve design robustness of product and process and realize robustness design and optimization of product and process. It proved that analysis and optimization of response surface model based on Monte Carlo method was a good robustness design method, and can markedly improve robustness, precision and pass percentage of product and process.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Funding</title><p>It was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71102047, 71302016, 71302017) and “The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (NKZXB1202). Many thanks are also given to anonymous reviewers.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.48065-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>FONSECA</surname><given-names> J.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FRISWELL</surname><given-names> M.I. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEES</surname><given-names> A.W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>EFFICIENT ROBUST DESIGN VIA MONTE CARLO SAMPLE REWEIGHTING</article-title><source>. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING</source><volume> 69</volume>,<fpage> 2279</fpage>-<lpage>2301</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1002/NME.1850</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>RAY</surname><given-names> L.R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> STENGEL</surname><given-names> R.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1993</year>)<article-title>A MONTE CARLO APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF CONTROL SYSTEM ROBUSTNESS</article-title><source>. AUTOMATICA</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 229</fpage>-<lpage>236</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/0005-1098(93)90187-X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ARNÉR, M. (2014) MONTE CARLO METHODS FOR ROBUST DESIGN. STATISTICAL ROBUST DESIGN: AN INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE. PUBLISHED ONLINE, 177-193. HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1002/9781118842003.CH10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ERIC, V. (1998) ROBUST MONTE CARLO METHODS FOR LIGHT TRANSPORT SIMULATION. PH.D. DISSERTATION OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CONCEICAO</surname><given-names> E.L.T. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PORTUGAL</surname><given-names> A.A.T.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>FINITE-SAMPLE COMPARISON OF ROBUST ESTIMATORS FOR NONLINEAR REGRESSION USING MONTE CARLO SIMULATION: PART I. UNIVARIATE RESPONSE MODELS</article-title><source>. COMPUTERS &amp; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 530</fpage>-<lpage>544</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.COMPCHEMENG.2010.04.009</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>TODOROV</surname><given-names> V.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NEYKOV</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NEYTCHEV</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>ROBUST TWO-GROUP DISCRIMINATION BY BOUNDED INFLUENCE REGRESSION: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION</article-title><source>. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS &amp; DATA ANALYSIS</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 289</fpage>-<lpage>302</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/0167-9473(94)90122-8</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M</surname><given-names>UR</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> J. </surname><given-names> BUDMAN</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> H. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>ROBUST OPTIMIZATION OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES USING BAYESIAN DESCRIPTION OF PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTY</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL</source><volume> 24</volume>,<fpage> 422</fpage>-<lpage>430</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.JPROCONT.2013.10.004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>WANG</surname><given-names> Y.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CAO</surname><given-names> Z.J. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AU</surname><given-names> S.-K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>EFFICIENT MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF PARAMETER SENSITIVITY IN PROBABILISTIC SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS</article-title><source>. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS</source><volume> 37</volume>,<fpage> 1015</fpage>-<lpage>1022</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.COMPGEO.2010.08.010</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MENG, X.-J., ZHANG, C., ZHAN, M.-J. AND SHI, Z.-X. (2004) ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF LOCUS GENERATING LINKAGE THROUGH MONTE-CARLO METHOD. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 23, 203, 205, 214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ZHANG</surname><given-names> L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ZHANG</surname><given-names> W.M. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SHEN</surname><given-names> Y.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2006)<article-title>ZHANG, L., ZHANG, W.M. AND SHEN, Y.H.  ROBUST DESIGN FOR LOCUS GENERATING STEERING MECHANISM BASED ON MONTE CARLO METHOD</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BEIJING</source><volume> 28</volume>,<fpage> 1174</fpage>-<lpage>1177</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>YAN</surname><given-names> Y.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MENG</surname><given-names> Q.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> WANG</surname><given-names> S.A. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GUO</surname><given-names> X.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>ROBUST OPTIMIZATION MODEL OF SCHEDULE DESIGN FOR A FIXED BUS ROUTE</article-title><source>. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES</source><volume> 25</volume>,<fpage> 113</fpage>-<lpage>121</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.TRC.2012.05.006</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>VARAS</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MATURANA</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PASCUAL</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>IGNACIO VARGAS, JORGE VERA. SCHEDULING PRODUCTION FOR A SAWMILL: A ROBUST OPTIMIZATION APPROACH</article-title><source>. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS</source><volume> 150</volume>,<fpage> 37</fpage>-<lpage>51</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.IJPE.2013.11.028</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48065-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>BOYLAN</surname><given-names> G.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GOETHALS</surname><given-names> P.L. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CHO</surname><given-names> B.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>ROBUST PARAMETER DESIGN IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED ENVIRONMENTS: AN INVESTIGATION OF TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN COSTS AND PRECISION WITHIN VARIABLE PROCESSES</article-title><source>. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING</source><volume> 37</volume>,<fpage> 2394</fpage>-<lpage>2416</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.APM.2012.05.017</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>