The clinical syndrome of acute abdomen is characterized by a sudden severe abdominal pain that sometimes evolve emergency treatment or surgical interference. A definitive method of diagnosis is a must to obtain cure [1] . The differential diagnosis has a wide range of disorders varying from benign diseases to cases requiring immediate surgery [2] .

Acute aortic syndromes can be aortic dissection, ruptured aortic aneurysm, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and intramural hematoma. These illnesses present similarly and have incidence estimates of two to four cases per 100,000 people per year [3] [4] . Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential to improve survival because acute aortic dissection has a pre- and in-hospital mortality rate of 20% and 30%, respectively [4] .

Several imaging modalities can be used, including MRI and transesophageal echocardiography, but CT has emerged as the first choice given its availability, speed, and accuracy with sensitivity and specificity approaching 100% in diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes (aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and ruptured aortic aneurysm) [5] .

Helical scanning CT has been used as a standard technique for triaging most patients suffering from acute cholecystitis. It provides useful diagnosis information for omenta, mesenteries, gut, and peritoneum... etc. with insignificant effect by the bowel gas and fat [6] -[8] . Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) gained important role with high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (96% - 98%) for detection of urinary stones [9] .

This study attempted to reveal the efficacy of non-contrast CT during the diagnosis of urinary stones and also to assess the diagnostic performance of the unenhanced and enhanced with contrast phases separately in patients imaged with CT for suspected acute aortic syndromes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department in acute conditions.

After getting the approval of Ethical committee at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, this study retrospectively reviewed electronically available notes for patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) over the last year 2013. All patients examined on a multi-slice CT scanner (64 slice Siemens somatom definition dual source), and the contrast administrated using automatic power injector. Different patient preparation and variety Helical CT scanning protocols were selected to understand the nature of diseases causing acute abdomen pain. The imaging protocols selected are based on the manufacturer original settings with the local expertise opinion added, clinical setting and most likely diagnosis. More emphasis on customization of some parameters and factors to patients individually e.g. slice and pitch collimation; implementation of IV, rectal, and oral contrast media; and limited exam or unlimited-focus complete pelvic and abdominal study. Summarized clinical findings, as in routine practice, will be provided. The CT scan was evaluates and records data in a similar way. The Helical CT protocols varied from enhanced using contrast and uenhanced CT of the abdomen and chest for acute aortic syndrome suspects and non-contrasted CT for urinary stone and Helical CT scanning for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively identified as shown bellow (Table 1 and Table 2).

^*Anterior posterior.

^**Three dimensional/Multi-planer reconstruction.

^$Region of interest; ^#Hounsfield unit.

^{^}Maximum intensity projection; ^{^^}Volume rendering technique; ⁺Not available.

Approximately 30,000 patients with acute abdomen were reviewed in an earlier study [10] , the observation revealed that 28% having appendicitis, 9.7% showed acute cholecystitis, 4.1% with small-bowel obstruction, 4% with acute gynecologic disease, 2.9% showed acute pancreatitis, 2.9% with acute renal colic, 2.5% with perforated peptic ulcer, and 1.5% with diverticulitis. About 30% of patients showed no direct cause could be identified.

Recent report [11] indicates that multi-detector row CT urography with multi-planar reformations is helpful in evaluation of the urinary tract. The reported findings of urinary stone in this work were similar to that reported by [12] i.e. with non-contrasted CT, calcified and non-calcified urinary stones was identified, along with the location and size of the stone from kidney to bladder. A secondary sign of obstructive uropathy, including hydronephrosis was noticed. On non-contrast CT, calcified urinary stones appear as opaque densities within the urinary tract. Degree of accuracy in interpreting a non-contrast CT in a case with urinary stone increases in accordance with the severity of urinary obstruction.

Previous studies demonstrated that CT allowed diagnosis and determining the size, composition, and location of stones [13] . This was done by analyzing the correlation between dimensions of stone using CT scan assessment and plain X-ray of the kidneys, bladder and ureter. Other studies [14] [15] to evaluate calculi, it was possible to demonstrate a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 96%, and accuracy of 97% in 60 patients. Identification of the number, size, and location of urinary stones and detection of hydronephrosis are easily made with CT.

Ruptured aortic aneurysm symptoms are commonly abdominal pain, hypotension, and a pulsatile mass. Ruptured aneurysm diagnosed in elderly men must be considered if they were smokers due to increased possibility of rupture. It is clear that Helical CT is the chosen modalitiy for those patients possibly having aneurysm dissection together with rupture [5] [16] . An immediate sign of aneurysm rupture; and focal discontinuity of intimal calcification is the increased-attenuation crescent sign, as a result of hemorrhage in mural thrombus or may be within the wall of the aneurysm [17] .

Oral contrast media is not recommended. Images that are unenhanced are basically obtained to look for the hyperdensed blood related to signs of impending rupture. Infusion of contrast media i.e. 3 - 4 ml/sec and thinner collimation of about 5 mm are used for idealresolution for vascular visualization [18] . In CT images, first signs of rupture show a retroperitoneal hematoma or may be frank extravasation of IV contrast media [19] . For isolated intramural hematoma, enhanced contrast CTA sensitivity reached 100%.

Ultrasound imaging is usually the used method for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, but CT examination is best choice in case of uncertain image diagnose. In acute cholecystitis, Helical CT findings are mostly sensitive in mural thickening for more than 3 mm and inflamed wall enhancement [20] .

Because of hepatic artery hyperemia and early venous drainage, transient focal increased attenuation of liver was observed side by side to the inflamed gallbladder [21] . Moreover, Helical CT is capable in providing information for complications of acute cholecystitis e.g. gangrene and perforation.

According to the findings, non-contrast Helical CT scan performed after ultrasonography is the common diagnostic modality for patients with urinary stones in the emergency department. Enhanced CT with contrast has the highest sensitivity for intramural hematoma. The scanning parameter of the protocols for acute aortic syndrome must undergo customized adjustment to maintain dose from radiation as low as reasonably achievable.