<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ACS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Atmospheric and Climate Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0414</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/acs.2014.44060</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ACS-50584</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Study of Human Thermal Comfort, Ozone and Respiratory Diseases in Children
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>maury</surname><given-names>de Souza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Flavio</surname><given-names>Aristone</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luciane</surname><given-names>Fernandes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute of Physics, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, 
Campo Grande, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>amaury.de@uol.com.br(MDS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>672</fpage><lpage>678</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: To assess the impact of air pollution and ozone on morbidity due to respiratory diseases among children from 
  2005 to 2008.
   
  Methods:
   
  The database was composed by daily reports on visits by children with respiratory diseases in health units of the Unified Health System (SUS) in the municipality of Campo Grande, MS, Brazil, by daily levels of ozone concentration measured by the Department of Physics, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, and by daily measurements of temperature and relative humidity provided by the Agricultural Research Corporation-EMBRAPA Gado de Corte-MS. The relationship between respiratory diseases and ozone concentration was investigated through Generalized Linear Models (GLM) using the multiple Poisson regression model. The significance level α = 5% was adopted for all tests.
   
  Results:
   
  It was observed that the association between ozone (lagged by three time-steps) and attendance for respiratory diseases in children was statistically significant. The bio-meteorological variable Wind-adjusted Effective Temperature (lagged by four time-steps) was also significantly associated with diseases. Conclusions:
   
  The results suggest that the surface ozone concentration promotes adverse effects on children’s health even when pollutant levels are below the amounts permitted by law.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Air Pollution</kwd><kwd> Adverse Effects</kwd><kwd> Child Health (Public Health)</kwd><kwd> Respiratory Diseases</kwd><kwd> Temperature</kwd><kwd> Lag</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Problems arising from atmospheric pollution began to be considered as a public health issue following the Industrial Revolution, when people began to be concentrated in the urban structures that we know today. The level of city population in Brazil reached 87% by 2010 and the cities of the developing world will make up 81 per cent of urban humanity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Atmospheric pollution has affected population health, even where the levels are found to satisfy current legislation. The age-bands most affected are children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref4">4</xref>] and the elderly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref5">5</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref8">8</xref>] ; both of the groups are most susceptible to the deleterious effects of pollution. Some studies have shown a positive association between mortality by respiratory diseases and atmospheric pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The limited information currently available on the relation between atmospheric pollution and respiratory diseases in cities was the motivation for the work reported here. Its objective was to explore the relation between ozone concentration and the number of hospital admissions for diseases of the respiratory tract in children from the city of Campo Grande-MS, Brazil.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>The work is an ecological study of time series from the township of Campo Grande in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul. Records of out-patient visits to the city’s health centers were obtained from the Secretary for Municipal Health, and were used to establish attendances by children in the 0 to 14-year age-group. The period of analysis ran from the first of January 2005 to 31 December 2008. Respiratory diseases were coded using the 9<sup>th</sup> Revised International Classification of Diseases (CID-9 460 to 519).</p><p>The city of Campo Grande (20˚27ꞌ16&quot;S; 54˚47ꞌ16&quot;W, altitude 650 m) is sited on the Maracaju-Campo Grande plateau, 150 km from the beginning of the largest flood-plain in the world, the Mato Grosso Pantanal (area 139 111 km<sup>2</sup>). The region is tropical with high temperatures predominating throughout the year, high rainfall and high relative humidity. Mean annual temperature in the city is 23.5˚C and mean annual rainfall is 1396 mm; mean humidity is 71%, varying over the year between 64.7% and 79%. Winds are predominantly from the north (N), followed by north-east (NE) and east (E) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Mean summer temperature is 25.2˚C, with maximum temperatures varying between 35.8˚C and 37˚C and minimum temperatures between 9.8˚C and 12.8˚C. Summer rainfall is high, averaging 552.9 mm whilst relative humidity and atmospheric pressure vary little, and are always high. In winter, temperatures are more agreeable and tend to be uniform over the city; rainfall, relative humidity and atmospheric pressure are lower. Mean winter temperature varies between 20.3˚C and 22.2˚C; temperature maxima range between 34.8˚C and 39˚C, with minima between –1˚C and 3˚C. Records show that mean rainfall in winter is 108.7 mm. Relative humidity varies between 58.5% and 70.9% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The pollutant taken for study was ozone concentration (O<sub>3</sub> in ppb) present in the atmosphere during the period 2005 to 2008, measured daily at the monitoring station of the Physics Department of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul. Measures were recorded every 15 minutes through each 24-hour day to give ozone concentrations. Daily mean concentrations were calculated and were taken as estimates of air pollution within Campo Grande city. Information on rainfall, temperature, humidity and wind-speed were obtained from the EMPRAPA research station for beef production in Campo Grande.</p><p>The level of human heat comfort (CTH) is measured in terms of comfort indices, otherwise called bio-me- teorological indices. The present work used the two indices Effective Temperature (ET), and Wind-adjusted Effective Temperature (WET). ET is calculated from the meteorological parameters temperature and humidity; WET uses these parameters together with wind-speed. These two indices were chosen because they give an acceptable representation of climate.</p><p>Quantitative variables were summarized in terms of measures of central tendency (mean, median) and dispersion (standard deviation) and coefficient of variation; modeling was in terms of Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) using Poisson Multiple Regression (PMR).</p><p>In PMR, the dependent variable (the number of hospital admissions) is a counting process: that is, it is a discrete quantitative variable. The independent variables are candidate variables for explaining the behavior of the series through time. These independent variables were meteorological variables (maximum, minimum and mean temperatures; humidity of the air; CTH indices; wind-speed and rainfall). The response variable in a Poisson regression should follow a Poisson distribution in which the mean of the response variable is equal to its variance. This may not always occur when analyzing experimental data, when over-dispersion (variance greater than the mean) or under-dispersion (variance less than the mean) may occur. It is still possible to use Poisson regression after data transformation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>The biological effects of pollution and climate variables on human health appear to show a time-lag beginning at the time of exposure to polluting and climate agents. The hospital appearances on a specific day can therefore be associated with both the pollution level and climate variables of that day, and in preceding days. It is therefore necessary to determine the “lag” structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Before fitting the PMR, correlations with lagged variables were calculated to allow for the fact that subjects’ respiratory diseases can be out of phase with pollution and climate forcing variables. The lags used were from one to seven days, since the object of the study was to determine whether correlations existed between the numbers of hospital admissions and environmental variables up to the start of the preceding week. The correlation matrix was therefore calculated between variables used in the study and their lagged series, so as to determine which variables should enter the model as measured by their statistical significance, and to explore whether collinearity existed between the independent variables.</p><p>A Poisson Regression Model on each independent variable separately was used to determine which meteorological variables were relevant at the P &lt; 0.25 significance level; those that were, were then used in a Poisson Multiple Regression Model given by the following equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50584-formula151"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where PNECRIAN is the dependent variable (the number of hospital admissions with respiratory disease for child in the city of Campo Grande), a and β are parameters to be estimated, and the Xi are the independent variables.</p><p>PRMs were fitted for the groupings week-day, public holiday, and year. Relative risk (RR) was calculated using the fitted model parameters by means of:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50584-formula152"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where X is the value of the independent variables and β is the parameter estimated by the Poisson regression. The 95% confidence interval for the estimated parameter β is given by the following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.50584-formula153"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where SE is the standard error of the estimated β.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During the study period, 4691 children were treated for pneumonia defined according to Chapter VIII of CID-9. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows that between 2005 and 2008 the pollutant ozone O<sub>3</sub> did not exceed the daily limit for air quality, 80 ppb, defined by Conama, the National Council for the Environment.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows descriptive statistics for the variables number of children with pneumonia, daily levels of ozone pollution, maximum, minimum and mean air temperatures, relative humidity of air, and bio-meteorolog- ical indices.</p><p>Ozone air pollution is positively correlated with respiratory disease (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The table also shows a proportional inverse relation between diseases and climatic indicators, except for wind-speed, for which the correlation is positive.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the model with greatest statistical significance, having the least AIC (Akaike Information Criterion). The smaller the AIC statistic, the better is the model at representing the relation between explanatory variables and the response variable. The model in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> was found to be most efficient for predicting the number of hospital admissions for respiratory diseases in the city of Campo Grande. It can be seen that the association between ozone (lagged by three time-steps), and attendance for respiratory disease was statistically significant. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> also shows that the variable Minimum WET (the bio-meteorological variable, lagged by four time- steps) is also significant.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows that, for the lag period used, ozone has a positive and significant association with the disease. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the percentage increase in admissions resulting from increased ozone concentration.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the negative association between number of admissions of children with respiratory disease and the index Minimum WET; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the percentage decrease in number of admissions.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mean daily concentrations of pollutants analyzed during 2005-2008, for the city of Campo Grande</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Relative risk resulting from increased ozone (O<sub>3</sub>)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Increase in admissions with increasing ozone level (O<sub>3</sub>)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Relative risk for the index minimum WET</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Decrease in admissions with increase in the index minimum WET</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/16-4700322x13.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statistics—Campo Grande-MS, 2005-2008</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PNECRIAN (n˚)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ozone (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rainfall (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum Temp. (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum Temp. (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Temp. (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wind-speed (m/s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum ET (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum ET (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean ET (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum WET (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum WET (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean WET (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1461</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlations between ozone, climatic variables, bio-meteorological indices and respiratory diseases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PNECRIAN</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ozone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Precipitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.076</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.174</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wind-speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum ET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.028</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum ET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.092</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean ET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.046</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum WET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum WET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean WET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.034</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Regression coefficients, relative risk and 95% confidence intervals for ozone in the model</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Regression coefficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Standard error</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Relative risk</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >95 % Confidence interval for exp (β)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intercept</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0489</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ozone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Weekday = 0]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.741</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Public holiday = 1]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Year 2005]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.960</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Year 2006]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.905</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Year 2007]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.962</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Year 2008]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum WET</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0. 008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0. 0024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0. 003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Although this paper reports an ecological study in which the unit studied is the group of individuals representative of a district, city or even a country and not individual observation, it must be emphasized that these studies have been shown to be efficient for analysis of the effects of pollution on health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref6">6</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref13">13</xref>] . The option of working with the total number of respiratory diseases and not with each specific pathology, rests on the probability of reducing the range of various services supplying the original data. Through the use of increasingly-sophisticated regression models, confounding factors which could interfere with the data analysis could be more efficiently controlled. Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) were used to describe the relation between response and explanatory variables, in particular by using Poisson Multiple Regression because the response variable was a counting variable, quantitative and discrete, representing the number of admissions for respiratory disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>The independent variables described behavior of the series through time. These were meteorological variables (maximum and minimum temperatures and humidity; human heat comfort index CTH; wind-speed and rainfall). Variables “Day in the week” and “Public holiday” were used to control short-duration seasonality, whilst the variable “Year” was used to control longer-term seasonality.</p><p>Positive associations were found between ozone level and infant respiratory disease in Campo Grande. These effects are similar to those found in other Brazilian cities, especially in S&#227;o Paulo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref4">4</xref>] in terms of both the diversity of pollutants and the magnitude of the estimated effects.</p><p>The increased incidence of respiratory disease under winter conditions is due to two main factors: the low temperatures, and the increases in concentrations of primary pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref13">13</xref>] . Ozone O<sub>3</sub> is a secondary pollutant which depends on the presence of solar radiation and on precursors, such as nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbonates. Dry winters with sunny days satisfy all the conditions for increased levels of this photochemical agent, as in other seasons of the year. Thus, O<sub>3</sub> does not show high correlation with other variables included for analysis in the present study. Nevertheless its oxidizing action and its capacity to induce inflammation give it an active role in causing and aggravating respiratory diseases, as reported in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.50584-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Based on the results found it can be concluded that, although levels of air pollution in Campo Grande are not very high and do not exceed standards above which air is regarded as polluted, they are nevertheless associated with respiratory problems in the city’s child population.</p><p>It is hoped that the results reported here will be useful in terms of measuring the risks to which the population is exposed, and for developing measures to minimize such risks, thus contributing to planning issues of environmental or urban health and the consequent development of public policy.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.50584-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">State of World Population (2011) UNFPA—United Nations Population Fund. &lt;br&gt;http://www.unfpa.org/swp/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braga, A.L.F., Conceicao, G.M.S., Pereira, L.A.A., Kishi, H.S., Pereira, J.C.R., Andrade, M.F., et al. (1999) Air Pollution and Pediatric Respiratory Hospital Admissions in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Env-&lt;br&gt;ironmental Medicine, 1, 95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1301(199904/06)1:2&lt;95::AID&lt;br&gt;-JEM16&gt;3.0.CO;2-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braga, A.L.F., Saldiva, P.H.N., Pereira, L.A.A., Menezes, J.J.C., Conceicao, G.M.S., Lin, C.A., et al. (2001) Health Effects of Air Pollution Exposure on Children and Adolescents in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pediatric Pulmonology, 31, 106-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0496(200102)31:2&lt;106::AID-PPUL1017&gt;3.0.CO;2-M</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, A.C., Martins, M.A., Farhat, S.L., Pope III, C.A., Conceicao, G.M.S., Anastácio, M.V., et al. (1999) Air Pollution and Respiratory Illness of Children in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 13, 475-488.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00210.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atkinson, R.W., Anderson, H.R., Sunyer, J., Ayres, J., Baccini, M., Vonk, J.M., et al. (2001) Acute Effects of Particulate Air Pollution on Respiratory Admission: Results from APHEA 2 Project. Air Pollution and Health: A European Approach. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 164, 1860-1866.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2010138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martins, L.C., Latorre, M.R.D.O., Cardoso, M.R.A., Goncalves, F.L.T., Saldiva, P.H.N. and Braga, A.L.F. (2002) Poluicao atmosférica e atendimentos por pneumonia e gripe em Sao Paulo, Brasil. Revista de Saúde Pública, 36, 88-94.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102002000100014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwartz, J. and Marcus, A. (1990) Mortality and Air Pollution in London: A Time Series Analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 131, 185-194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwartz, J. and Dockery, D.W. (1992) Particulate Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in Steubenville, Ohio. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 12-19; discussion 20-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sant’Anna Neto, J.L. and da Anunciacao, V.S. (2001) Uma reflexao do espaco urbano da cidade de Campo Grande/MS na perspectiva climática. Revista Pantaneira, Aquidauana, 3, 55-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">da Anunciacao, V.S. and Sant’Anna Neto, J.L. (2002) Urban Climate of the City of Campo Grande-MS (in Portuguese). In: Sant’Anna Neto, J.L., Org., Os climas das cidades brasileiras, Editora da UNESP, Presidente Prudente, 22-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tadano, Y.S., Ugaya, C.M.L. and Franco, A.T. (2009) Método de regressao de Poisson: Metodologia para avaliacao do impacto da poluicao atmosférica na saúde populacional. Ambiente &amp; Sociedade, 12, 241-255.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2009000200003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coelho, M.S.Z.S., Alves, F.L.T.G. and Latorre, M.R.D.O. (2010) Statistical Analysis Aiming at Predicting Respiratory Tract Disease Hospital Admissions from Environmental Variables in the City of Sao Paulo. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2010, Article ID: 209270. &lt;br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/209270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, H.R., Leon, A.P., Bland, J.M., Bower, J.S. and Strachan, D.P. (1996) Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in London: 1987-1992. BMJ, 312, 665-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7032.665</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.50584-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hastie, T.J. and Tibshirani, R.J. (1995) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>