<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ACS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Atmospheric and Climate Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0414</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/acs.2014.43039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ACS-48112</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>EARTH &amp; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Climate Change, Variability and Rainfall Probability for Crop Planning in Few Districts of Central India</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Suchit</surname><given-names>Kumar Rai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunil</surname><given-names>Kumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arvind</surname><given-names>Kumar Rai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Satyapriya</surname><given-names> </given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dana</surname><given-names>Ram Palsaniya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi (UP)-284003, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>suchitrai67@yahoo.co.in(SKR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>394</fpage><lpage>403</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	Trend and climate change were
studied in annual rainfall data for the period of 62 years (1949-2010) of Sagar
and 65 years (1945-2010) of Damoh districts of Bundelkhand region of central India.
The analysis of weekly rainfall probability was also carried out at both the
locations for field operations and crop planning in rainfed agricultural system
for improving the farmer’s livelihood. Mean annual rainfall was 1233.8 mm with
32.6% variability for Sagar and 1225.1 mm with 30.3% variability for Damoh
region. Sagar and Damoh region exhibited significant decreasing trend in the total
amount of annual rainfall in the last 15 years (1996 to 2010). Also, both
locations showed significant long-term decreasing trend in annual rainfall.
Climate of both the regions have changed as in the recent 15 years annual
rainfall had decreased by 156.4 and 310.7 mm at Sagar and Damoh from their long
period average (LPA), respectively. The Initial
and conditional rainfall probability analysis at Damoh reinforced
that Initial probabilities {P (W)} of getting 10 mm rainfall per week was 76%
during 25<sup>th</sup> (18-24 June) SMW. Thus, the seed bed preparation could
be initiated during this week. Initial as well as conditional probability of
wet week followed by wet week {P(W/W} of getting 20 mm rainfall was more than
80% during 27<sup>th</sup> SMW (2-7 July) in Sagar district. Therefore, this
week is most suitable for sowing operation in this district.
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Climate Change</kwd><kwd> Rainfall Trend</kwd><kwd> Initial and Conditional Rainfall Probability and Crop Planning</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Climate from geological epoch has been changing with time and it is reasonable to assume that it will change. Recently, the severe drought conditions have disrupted human societies in Bundelkhand region of central India and got the attention of India on reality of climate variability and its significance. The information on annual and seasonal rainfall of a region is useful to design water harvesting structure for agricultural operations, field preparation, seeding, irrigation, fertilizer application and overall in field of crop planning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref2">2</xref>] . Climatic variability, particularly rainfall is the major factor influencing the agricultural productivity and sustainability in the tropics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref3">3</xref>] . Around 60% of the Indian agriculture is rain-dependent, distress-prone and vulnerable to climate. Constant increase in green house gas concentrations, since pre-industrial times, has led to positive radiative forcing of the climate, tending to warming the surface. The fourth assessment report of IPCC confirmed the rise in atmospheric temperature by 0.74˚C over the last 100 years and projected a temperature increase of 1.8˚C to 4˚C by 2100 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref4">4</xref>] . There is also a global trend for increased frequency of drought as well as heavy precipitation events, posing potential threat to ecosystem especially agricultural production and productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref6">6</xref>] . Recent studies indicate that increase in temperature with rainfall uncertainties may lead to loss of 10% - 40% crop production in India due to its large population and limited resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref7">7</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref9">9</xref>] . Uncertainties and seasonal migrations have been further compounded due to high frequency of the extreme rainfall and weather events like droughts due to global warming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref10">10</xref>] . Historically, Bundelkhand region of Central India used to have one drought in 16 years in 19<sup>th</sup> century which increased by three times during the period 1968 to 2000 and in last 10 years, region have witnessed five drought years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref11">11</xref>] . Several studies have been undertaken in India to assess the rainfall variability. Blandford [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref12">12</xref>] was the first meteorologist to made extensive studies on Indian rainfall. Parthasarthy and Mooley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref13">13</xref>] for Karnataka and Dhar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref14">14</xref>] for Tamilnadu have found the significant evidence for the presence of different cycles ranging from 2 years to short periods in the rainfall series of different regions of India. Detailed analysis of long-period rainfall data over different sub divisions of India and also over India as a whole does not indicate any long-term climatic change, but only indicate year-to-year random fluctuations during 100 years (1871-1978). Also, some significant cycles of 2 (quasi-biennial) - 15 years periods were noted only in some regions of India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref16">16</xref>] . Annual rainfall along with a five-year moving average showed that trend was alternatively increasing and decreasing in nature consisting of a period of five or six years at Pusa, Bihar, India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref17">17</xref>] . It showed long-term increasing trend with a rate of 1.98 mm per year. Also, in another districts of Bihar i.e., Madhepura, a significant long-term increasing trend was noticed in annual rainfall series with a rate of 13.8 mm/year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref18">18</xref>] . Both the locations under study are categorized as rainfed regions with low, erratic and uncertain rainfall pattern with frequent dry spells during the monsoon season. Hence, cropping in monsoon season is tricky with very high risk of crop failure due to early withdrawal of monsoon. The current changing climatic scenarios are projected to have a major impact on the rainfall pattern and its intensity which would directly affect the ecosystem, agricultural production practices, water resource management and the crop planning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref11">11</xref>] . The rainfed agro-ecology is characterized as vulnerable for agricultural operations which revolve around moisture availability due to rainfall pattern, amount, intensity and its uses for crop production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref19">19</xref>] . In most of studies the workers have suggested the cropping pattern considering the rainfall amount at different probability levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref20">20</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref22">22</xref>] . Taking into account these climatic and probability factor, the current study was conducted at two rainfed districts of Bundelkhand region namely Sagar and Damoh for interlinking the rainfall probability and intensity factor with the crop planning pattern in the region.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Weekly rainfall data for the period 1949 or 1945 to 2010 i.e., for 62/66 years pertaining to Sagar (23˚5'N, 78˚5'E, 594 m msl), and Damoh (25˚5'N, 79˚29'E, 595 m msl), respectively were obtained from India Meteorological Department (IMD), Pune, India. Weekly, annual and seasonal rainfall distribution patterns were critically examined and analyzed adopting procedure suggested by Panse and Sukhatme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref23">23</xref>] . In order to apply appropriate statistical test, the frequency distribution of annual and seasonal rainfall series have been tested for normality by Fisher’s statistics. The annual rainfall series of both locations were divided in three sub-periods i.e., I sub-period (1945/41-1970), II sub-period (1971-1995) and III sub-period (1996-2010). The sub-period averages were compared with long period average using Cramer’s test (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\e6dd0e7d-21b5-41b3-bd6f-f91f967ae06c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref24">24</xref>] , to apply Cramers’s test (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\fe95005c-5095-4340-b01f-dea6b8309ac5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\700054fd-8113-45f7-aac3-4582ad45bf5d.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and S be defined respectively as the mean and standard deviation of the entire record of N values.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula77"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\dd20bf0c-b180-4077-be1b-506daa9d6eb0.png"/></disp-formula><p>Then computed, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\78b2ec94-607e-41f6-bc63-f8837b219921.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula78"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\97f4d31f-6f29-4264-981a-cf7d3e7277d9.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula79"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\97f4d31f-6f29-4264-981a-cf7d3e7277d9.png"/></disp-formula><p>Now, let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\6fb805e8-04f0-42f1-83ba-38dbabe6819c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be defined as the mean of the sub-period of n values,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula80"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\8c97e318-556e-4d59-bcc6-9bd7a8d12976.png"/></disp-formula><p>Defining:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula81"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\adc4dae3-ce21-471c-ba4d-a031917c1247.png"/></disp-formula><p>We computed:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula82"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\30991cc0-33fa-4a96-8294-49df9943c2fc.png"/></disp-formula><p>The statistic <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\5002cef4-51d4-4533-a0a2-a493a8751fe6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is distributed as “Student’s” t with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\9241957a-4be4-4154-85e1-5bd535eeda08.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> degrees of freedom.</p><p>Trends were examined using Mann-Kendall rank statistic (t), Spearman rank statistic (r<sub>s</sub>) and Gaussian low-pass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref24">24</xref>] . Before computing Mann-Kendall rank statistic (t), the series x<sub>i</sub> were replaced by their ranks k<sub>i</sub> such that each term was assigned a number ranging from 1 to N that reflects its magnitude relative to the magnitude of all other terms. Then statistic P for the series was computed, which is accomplished as follows. Count up the number of later terms whose values exceed k<sub>1</sub>, and denote this number by n<sub>1</sub>. Then compare the value of the second term that exceed k<sub>2</sub>, and denote this by n<sub>2</sub>. Continue this procedure for each term of the k<sub>i</sub> series with X<sub>N</sub><sub>−1</sub> and its corresponding number n<sub>N</sub><sub>−1</sub>, then P is given by the sum:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula83"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\88252681-90eb-4ed7-a4d8-c2fa6a5e9dcc.png"/></disp-formula><p>where, as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula84"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\5d5e0ea0-f2b0-4d92-8f4d-15e2e4512bbc.png"/></disp-formula><p>Spearman rank statistic (r<sub>s</sub>): The calculation r<sub>s</sub> requires that the series x<sub>i</sub> under investigation first be transformed to its rank k<sub>i</sub> as described above. The each term of rank series k<sub>i</sub> should be subtracted by i to compute d<sub>i</sub> (where “i” ranges from 1 to N).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula85"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\834d46dd-869a-4642-8368-c8a361b7498e.png"/></disp-formula><p>Then compute, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\dc69b8cd-5e4f-4d5e-8323-b2e56db419b0.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula86"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\cfeb70a2-67c6-4a71-8ed6-bfbfb34a4552.png"/></disp-formula><p>where, as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula87"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\c20bf52d-91f0-460f-b3c9-81b6ba65617c.png"/></disp-formula><p>For N larger than 8, the value of r<sub>s</sub> can be tested for significance by solving for “t” with the equation given below and comparing this with probability points of student’s t-distribution for (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\be40798e-b19c-4d9d-aad0-d63aafd49249.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) degrees of freedom.</p><p>t = <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\e07b0417-3d4d-4d6e-a8c5-ac358e0fa0e7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>An initial and conditional probability of weekly rainfall at different threshold limits (10, 20 and 40 mm) were computed using first order Markov chain process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref25">25</xref>] . Expected amount of rainfall at a given probability level was computed using Weibull’s distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref26">26</xref>] as given below</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48112-formula88"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\3e448b11-842a-4bce-89c5-6d1b8990ebdd.png"/></disp-formula><p>where, Pr is the plotting percentage, N is the total numbers of years and “m” is the rank of observed values of weekly rainfall, when rainfall in descending order of magnitude.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Mean and Variability in Annual and Seasonal Rainfall</title><p>The mean annual rainfalls for both the locations are more than 1200 mm with a standard deviation (SD) of more than 371 mm and coefficient of variation (CV) of more than 30.3%. The coefficient of variation indicates that the rainfall was highly variable at these two locations. The average annual rainfall varied from 491.7 mm (1981) to 2167.1 (1991) and 234.8 (1989) to 2387.3 mm (1956) at Sagar and Damoh, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The annual and monsoon (23<sup>rd</sup> - 39<sup>th</sup> SMW) rainfall series were normally distributed. About 90% of annual rainfall is received from the southwest monsoon during monsoon season. Average rainfall during the monsoon season is 1104.5 mm and varied from 440.6 to 1896.3 mm with SD of 320 mm at Sagar. The annual rainfall contribution was 2.5%, 4.4% and 3.5% to the pre-monsoon (10<sup>th</sup> - 22<sup>nd</sup> SMW), post monsoon (42<sup>nd</sup> - 50<sup>th</sup> SMW) and winter (51<sup>st</sup> - 9<sup>th</sup> SMW) season rainfall, respectively. The CV (more than 100%) indicated that the rainfalls during these seasons are highly variable. The rainfall ranged from zero to 201.5 mm, zero to 246.0 mm and zero to 196.2 mm for respective seasons, respectively. Coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis showed that rainfall series in all the three seasons were not normally distributed. At Damoh, similar pattern of rainfall during monsoon season was observed as at Sagar.</p><p>In monsoon season, the highest (1953.4 mm) and lowest (219 mm) rainfall was recorded during the year 1956 and 1989, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The potential evapo-transpiration was estimated to be 1457.2 mm and 1476.7 mm for Sagar and Damoh, respectively indicating annual water deficit by 658.8 mm and 634.9 mm for respective locations. Fisher statistics (g<sub>1</sub>/SE(g<sub>1</sub>) and g<sub>2</sub>/SE(g<sub>2</sub>)) were computed to test the normality at 95% level of significance. It is evident from the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> that the frequency of rainfall series during post monsoon, pre-mon- soon and winter season were not normally distributed except annual and monsoon season at both the locations. The mean seasonal rainfall varied from 30.5 to 54.4 mm with high degree of variability, since the CV is more than 100%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Climate Change and Trend Analysis</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1 Comparisons of Short Period Average Rainfall with the Long Period Average Rainfall</title><p>The average of these sub-periods along with Crammer’s t<sub>k</sub> test is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The average annual rainfall during the periods 1949-1970 and 1971 to 1995 was 1237.4 and 1185.2 mm and was not significantly (P &lt; 0.05)</p><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Statistical parameters of annual and seasonal rainfall in Sagar &amp; Damoh districts of central India</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Rainfall</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Sagar</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Highest (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lowest (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CK</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >g<sub>1</sub>/ SE(g<sub>1</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g<sub>2</sub>/ SE(g<sub>2</sub>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1233.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2167.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >491.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1104.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1896.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >201.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.5<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >196.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.6<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Damoh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1225.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2387.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >234.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1100.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >329.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1953.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.7<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.8<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Frequency distribution rainfall series are not normal at 95% level, %C: Contribution in annual rainfall (%), CS: Coefficient of skewness, CK: Coefficient kurtosis, g<sub>1</sub>/SE(g<sub>1</sub>) and g<sub>2</sub>/SE(g<sub>2</sub>): Fisher statistics.</p><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Annual rainfall during different period at Sagar &amp; Damoh locations of Central India</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Distract/Sub-Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sagar</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Distract/Sub-Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Damoh</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (SD) in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crammer t<sub>k</sub><sub> </sub>test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (SD) in mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crammer t<sub>k </sub>Test</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1949-1970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1237.4 (332.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1945-1970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1307.7 (363.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1971-1995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1185.2(472.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1971-1995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1181.9 (392.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996-2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1077.4 (216.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.2<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996-2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >914.4 (308.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.70<sup>**</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>, <sup>**</sup> Significant at 5 and 1% probability level.</p><p>differed from the long period average (LPA) of 1233.8 mm. However, the average annual rainfall (1077.4 mm) during the recent period (1995-2010) was significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lower than the LPA at Sagar. Rainfall had decreased by 156.4 mm during the recent period as compared to LPA. At Damoh, the I sub-period (1945-1970) average (1307.7 mm) was higher and differ significantly from their long period average (1225.1 mm). However, the II sub-period rainfall did not differ significantly (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) from its LPA. As the recent sub-period III is concerned, the average annual rainfall (914.4) was significantly different from its LPA, and rainfall had decreased significantly by 310.7 mm. Thus, it is clear that the climate of both the regions have changed with greater magnitude at Damoh as compared to Sagar.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Low Pass Filter</title><p>To understand the nature of trend, the annual series was subjected to “Gaussion low pass filter” (GLPF) analysis” i.e., a 9-point Gaussian low pass filter/weights (WMO, 1966) was used to give a smoothed curve [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref28">28</xref>] . The smoothed time series curve was drawn of the time series in addition to the trend line of original series. The low pass filters for annual rainfall series for both the locations are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. GLPF curves indicated that the trend in annual rainfall series was not linear but oscillatory in nature consisting for a period of 3 to 11 years for both the locations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). An increasing trend was noticed from year 1945 to 1961, whereas the rainfall during the period from 1962 to 1966 showed decreasing trend at Sagar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Thereafter, 1999 onward LPF showed a significant decreasing trend in the annual rainfall series. Linear trend was computed using regression over GLPF over the two locations showed that the annual rainfall had decreased by 213.9 and 274.3 mm over the period 62 and 66 years at Sagar and Damoh, respectively. The rate of decrease in annual rainfall series per year was higher (6.8 mm/year) at Damoh as compared to Sagar (5.23 mm/year) Also, regression analysis showed a significant decreasing trend (Y = −42.3x + 1363.2, R<sup>2</sup> = 40.0%) in annual rainfall series during the recent sub-period (1995-2010) with a rate of 42.3 mm/year. Similarly, at Damoh annual rainfall series exhibited significantly decreasing trend (Y = −24.941x + 1139.5 R<sup>2</sup> = 16.6%) during the recent period (1995-2010) with a rate of 24.9 mm/year. However the magnitude of decrease at Damoh was lower than Sagar.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Trend Analysis Using Mann-Kendall Rank and Spearman Rank Statistics</title><p>The Mann-Kendal rank (t) and Spearman Rank Statistics (r<sub>s</sub>) revealed a significant (P &lt; 0.05) decreasing trend in annual and kharif (26<sup>th</sup> - 41<sup>st</sup> SMW) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). At Sagar, rabi (42<sup>nd</sup> - 15<sup>th</sup> SMW) season rainfall showed slight decreasing trend but not statistically significant. However, rabi season rainfall at Damoh showed a significant decreasing trend.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Rainfall Probability for Crop Planning</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Initial and Conditional Rainfall Probability Analysis</title><p>The initial rainfall probability {P (W)} of getting 10 mm rainfall per week was 67% and 69% during 25<sup>th</sup> and 26<sup>th</sup> SMW, respectively at Sagar district (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>3</xref>) and hence, field preparation should be done during this period. The initial as well as conditional probability of wet week followed by wet week {P (W/W)} of getting 20 mm rainfall was more than 80% in 27<sup>th</sup> SMW. Therefore, this week is more suitable for sowing of crops. The top dressing of urea may be done during 32<sup>nd</sup> SMW as the {P (W/W)} of getting 20 mm rainfall during this period is more than 95% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>3</xref>). Similarly, the conditional probability of dry followed by dry {P (D/D)} of getting 10 mm rainfall is 78% in 35<sup>th</sup> (27 August-2 September) SMW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>not shown), and hence, pesticides may be sprayed to control insects, pests and diseases in all the affected crops. This period is also suitable for carrying out inter-cultural operations in the crops.</p><fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p> Gaussian low pass filter curves of annual rainfall at Sagar</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\26148073-2e5f-449a-87f2-7c702711e6fa.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p> Gaussian low pass filter curves of annual rainfall at Damoh</p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\0b813c49-c4b8-44ce-bc39-ba64163888c9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 3</object-id><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>. Mann-Kendal rank (t) and Spearman Rank Statistics (r<sub>s</sub>) of annual and seasonal rainfall</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Rainfall Series</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sagar</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Rainfall Series</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Damoh</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sub>s</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sub>s</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.22<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.1<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.24<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.10<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kharif</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.24<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kharif</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.21<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.62<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rabi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rabi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.20<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.96<sup>*</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>, Significant at 5% probability level.</p><p>The initial and conditional rainfall probability analysis at Damoh revealed that initial probabilities {P (W)} of getting 10 mm rainfall per week was 76% during 25<sup>th</sup> (18-24 June) SMW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Thus, the seed bed preparation could be initiated during 25<sup>th</sup> SMW, since an amount of 10 mm rainfall per week can be taken as the minimum requirement for seedbed preparation and even sowing in already tilled fields for rainfed kharif crops. However, sowing can be done during 26<sup>th</sup> SMW as the conditional probability of wet week followed by wet week of getting 20 mm rainfall was 76% - 94% during 26<sup>th</sup> - 27<sup>th</sup> SMW. More than 50% probability of 20 mm rainfall during a week is considered as the wet week and is ideal for the crop sowing operation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref22">22</xref>] . The {P (W/W)} of 40 mm rainfall during 27<sup>th</sup> to 37<sup>th</sup> (10-16 September) SMW was ranged between 56% to 80% (Fig- ure 4), hence, proper drainage provisions should be made in deep and medium black soils. The top dressing of</p><fig-group id="fig3"><caption><title>Figure 3</title><p> Initial and conditional probabilities of weekly rainfall at different threshold limits at Sagar</p></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\ef20741e-abe8-4f8e-9ac7-a8eb29f17e5f.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\5f8b6a9a-3f81-4221-9a2a-a41d7bdf7b15.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig4"><caption><title>Figure 4</title><p> Initial and conditional probabilities of weekly rainfall at different threshold limits at Damoh</p></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\9d82302e-6d7d-436c-ae34-0deb573dcc70.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\b068bc49-63ef-4421-8a77-3ce528a65ddb.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\10277f18-c0c4-4807-98f4-014bf795fdf5.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_4"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\5-4700280x\78102c2a-102b-44e8-a0b8-b3c3c4b16607.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>urea may be done during 32<sup>nd</sup> (6-12 August) and 33<sup>rd</sup> (13-19 August) SMW as the {P (W/W)} of getting 20 mm rainfall during this period is more than 90% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.48112-ref29">29</xref>] . Similarly, the conditional probability of dry followed by dry {P (D/D)} of getting 10 mm rainfall is 67% and 83% in 34<sup>th </sup>(20-26 September) and 39<sup>th</sup> (24-30 September) SMW, respectively, and hence, pesticides may be sprayed to control insects, pests and diseases in all the affected crops. Since the conditional probability of getting 10 mm rainfall is less than 20% during the crop season, therefore, intercultural operations may be planned as and when sunny days appears for 2 - 3 days.</p><p>The chances of taking rainfed rabi crops are more at Sagar in comparison to Damoh as the conditional probability of wet followed by wet is more than 60% during second week of January. However, at both the locations with the advancement of time, probability of getting rainfall is reducing and it was recorded that from 38<sup>th</sup> (17- 23 September) SMW, the initial probability of getting rainfall of 20 mm reduced to 40%, clearly indicating that supplemental irrigation is required for long duration varieties. The study also shows long-term rainfall probability studies may be important parameters for varietal selection to achieve assured production in a particular region. Short duration varieties of rainfed crops should be selected in the above mentioned regions, where, rainfall starts receding within 38<sup>th</sup> SMW. Therefore, ICRISAT bred chickpea cultivars, such as, ICCV-96029 (matures within 75 days), ICCV-2 and ICCV-93929 (both matures within 85 days) and IARI bred mustard cultivars like Pusa Agrani, Pusa Mahak, Pusa Tarak, Pusa Mustard 25 and Pusa Mustard 27 (all maturing between 100 - 110 days) should be selected for this region so that terminal droughts may be escaped.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Expected Rainfall Amount and Sustainable Crop Production Strategies</title><p>The minimum weekly rainfall amount expected at 60%, 70% and 80% probability level is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> for both locations along with their weekly long-term mean. As discussed above rainfall at 80% probability is assured rainfall and at 50% probability is the median limit for taking risk. At Sagar, the probability of more than 10 mm from 26<sup>th</sup> SMW is above 80%, and farmers can initiate their field preparation operations from 26<sup>th</sup> week and in subsequent weeks i.e., 27<sup>th</sup> (July 2-8) onwards probability of receiving more the 20 mm rainfall is more than 70%, which is ideal week for sowing of kharif crops in the region. The 30<sup>th</sup> and 31<sup>st</sup> SMW are also ideal time for the crop fertilization based upon the rainfall pattern and intensity. At Damoh, the expected amount of rainfall is 16 mm at 70% probability level during 25<sup>th</sup> SMW, sowing of kharif crops can be initiated for early duration crop varieties. Proper drainage network is essential for black soil dominant Damoh district as the expected amount of rainfall at 70% probability level is more than 60 mm during 30<sup>th</sup> to 33<sup>rd</sup> SMW. Long duration crop varieties can be taken at Damoh in comparison to Sagar as the rainy days are two week more at Damoh. Moreover, chances of taking double cropping are also more at Damoh by taking short duration crop varieties during kharif and early sowing of rabi crops.</p><table-wrap id="table4"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 4</object-id><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>. Expected weekly rainfall amount at different probability levels</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >SMW</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Date and Month</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Probability level (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Sagar</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Damoh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June, 11-17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June, 18-24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June, 25-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June 2-8, July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July, 9-15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July, 16-22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July, 23-29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July, 30-5, Aug</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aug, 6-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aug, 13-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aug, 20-26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aug, 27-2, Sep</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sep, 3-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sep, 10-16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sep, 17-23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sep, 24-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>At both the location, rainfall in the range of 18.9 to 79.2 mm is expected from 26<sup>th</sup> to 37<sup>th</sup> week (June 18-September16). Overall expected rainfall days are more than 84 at both the locations suggesting that medium duration varieties of various crops can be ideal in the region. However, at Damoh the expected amount of rainfall at 70% probability level was 16 mm during 25<sup>th</sup> ( June 18-24) SMW, suggesting that sowing can be done one week prior in comparison to Sagar. The intermittent rains of more than 20 mm rainfall was also expected at 70% level during 36<sup>th</sup> to 37<sup>th</sup> SMW, but thereafter probability of getting even 20 mm rainfall per week is not 70%, suggested that long duration varieties may be more suitable with supplemental irrigation.</p><p>The prevalent kharif season crops of the region include green gram, black gram, sorghum and maize depending upon the soil type. In view of the above studies, it is suggested that the kharif rainfed crops such as groundnut, black gram, green gram and sesamum should be sown during 27<sup>th</sup> SMW in both Sagar and Damoh region. The ideal combination of crops of the regions can be sorghum for the grain purpose intercropped with cowpea for the fodder purpose. Livestock integrated with the agricultural/food production systems is the cornerstone for rural economy of the farmers, therefore, the current suggested cropping systems integrating food-fodder system with rainfall probabilities may fetch an additional green fodder of 150 - 200 q&#183;ha<sup>−1</sup> to the farmers apart from the sorghum grain yield and improve their livelihood. Therefore, overall the current study reveals that past rainfall record analysis may be a handy tool for future rainfall probability projections, which alternatively can be of immense importance in the crop and other field operation planning in rainfed agricultural system as well as improving their livelihood.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The overall mean annual rainfall was 1233.8 mm with 32.6% variability for Sagar and 1225.1 mm with 30.3% variability for Damoh region. Mann-Kendall rank and spearman rank statistics revealed that there is a significant long-term decreasing trend in annual, kharif and rabi season rainfall at both locations. However, in the past 15 years (1996 to 2010), both regions exhibited significant decreasing trend in total amount of annual rainfall. Climate of both the regions has changed as in the recent 15 years annual rainfall has decreased by 156.4 and 310.7 mm at Sagar and Damoh from their long period average. Therefore, overall the current study reveals that past rainfall record analysis may be a handy tool for future rainfall probability projections, which alternatively can be of immense importance in the crop and other field operation planning in rainfed agricultural system as well as in improving their livelihood.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.48112-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SHARMA, H.C., CHAUHAN, H.S. AND RAM, S. (1979) PROBABILITY ANALYSIS OF RAINFALL FOR CROP PLANNING. JOURNALOF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 16, 934.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>KAR</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2002)<article-title>RAINFALL PROBABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION STRATEGIES IN COASTEL ORISSA</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEROLOGY</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 181</fpage>-<lpage>185</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">VIRMANI, S.M. (1994) CLIMATIC RESOURCES CHARACTERIZATION IN STRESSED TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTS: CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE. IN: VIRMANI, S.M., KATYAL, J.C., SWARAN, H.E. AND ABROL, I.P., EDS., STRESSED ECOSYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE. OXFORD AND IBH PUBLISHING CO. PVT. LIMITED, NEW DELHI, 149-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IPCC (2007) CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, SUMMARY FOR POLICYMAKERS. INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>COOPER</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAO</surname><given-names> K.P.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SINGH</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DIMES</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> TRAORE</surname><given-names> P.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAO</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DIXIT</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> TWOMMLOW</surname><given-names> S.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2009)<article-title>COOPER, P., RAO, K.P.C., SINGH, P., DIMES, J., TRAORE, P.S., RAO, K., DIXIT, P. AND TWOMMLOW, S.J.  FARMING WITH CURRENT AND FUTURE CLIMATIC RISK: ADVANCING A “HYPOTHESIS OF HOPE” FOR RAINFED AGRICULTURE IN THE SEMIARID TROPICS</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF SAT AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>19</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WATSON, R., ZINYOWERA, M. AND MOSS, R. (1996) CLIMATE CHANGE 1995—IMPACTS, ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE. CONTRIBUTION OF WORKING GROUP II TO THE SECOND ASSESSMENT REPORT OF THE IPCC, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FISCHER, G., SHAH, M. AND VELTHUIZEN, H.V. (2002) CLIMATE CHANGE AND AGRICULTURAL VULNERABILITY. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, LUXENBERG.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>PARRY</surname><given-names> M.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ROSENZEIG</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> IGLESIAS</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LIVEMORE</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FISCHER</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON GLOBAL FOOD PRODUCTION UNDER SRES EMISSIONS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCENARIOS</article-title><source>. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 53</fpage>-<lpage>67</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2003.10.008</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ROSENZEIG</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PARRY</surname><given-names> M.L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON WORLD FOOD SUPPLY</article-title><source>. NATURE</source><volume> 367</volume>,<fpage> 133</fpage>-<lpage>138</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1038/367133A0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>AGGARWAL</surname><given-names> P.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2008)<article-title>GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND INDIAN AGRICULTURE: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION</article-title><source>. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE</source><volume> 78</volume>,<fpage> 911</fpage>-<lpage>919</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>RAI</surname><given-names> S.K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BEHARI</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SATYAPRIYA</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAI</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> AGRAWAL</surname><given-names> R.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2012)<article-title>RAI, S.K., BEHARI, P., SATYAPRIYA, A., RAI, K. AND AGRAWAL, R.K.  LONG TERM TRENDS IN RAINFALL AND ITS PROBABILITY FOR CROP PLANNING IN TWO DISTRICTS OF BUNDELKHAND REGION</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGRO METEOROLOGY</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 74</fpage>-<lpage>78</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BLANDFORD, H.F. (1886) RAINFALL OF INDIA. MONSOON MONOGRAPH—INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT, NO. 3, 658.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">PARTHASARATHY, B. AND MOOLY, D.A. (1981) HUNDERED YEARS KARANATAKA RAINFALL. R-30, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL METEOROLOGY, TECHNICAL BULLETIEN, NO. 19, PUNE, INDIA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>DHAR</surname><given-names> O.N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAKHECHA</surname><given-names> P.R. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KULKARNI</surname><given-names> A.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (1982)<article-title>DHAR, O.N., RAKHECHA, P.R. AND KULKARNI, A.K.  TRENDS AND FLUCTUATIONS OF SEASONAL AND ANNUAL RAINFALL OF TAMILNADU</article-title><source>. PROCEEDINGS OF INDIAN ACADEMIC OF SCIENCES (EARTH AND PLANET SCIENCE)</source><volume> 91</volume>,<fpage> 97</fpage>-<lpage>104</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SARKAR</surname><given-names> R.P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> THAPLIYAL</surname><given-names> V. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (1988)<article-title>SARKAR, R.P. AND THAPLIYAL, V.  CLIMATIC CHANGE AND VARIABILITY</article-title><source>. MAUSAM</source><volume> 39</volume>,<fpage> 127</fpage>-<lpage>138</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>LAL</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DUGGAL</surname><given-names> Y.M. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAM</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (1992)<article-title>LAL, B., DUGGAL, Y.M. AND RAM, P.  TRENDS AND PERIODICITIES OF MONSOON AND ANNUAL RAINFALL OF DISTRICTS OF HARYANA STATE AND DELHI</article-title><source>. MAUSAM</source><volume> 43</volume>,<fpage> 127</fpage>-<lpage>142</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SINGH</surname><given-names> K.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SIKKA</surname><given-names> A.K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAI</surname><given-names> S.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2008)<article-title>SINGH, K.A., SIKKA, A.K. AND RAI, S.K.  RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION PATTERN AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CROP PLANNING AT PUSA IN BIHAR</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 198</fpage>-<lpage>203</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>RAI</surname><given-names> S.K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SINGH</surname><given-names> K.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2009)<article-title>RAI, S.K. AND SINGH, K.A.  RAINFALL VARIABILITY AND PROBABILITY FOR CROP PLANNING AT MADEPURA IN BIHAR</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 42</fpage>-<lpage>46</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>DEKA</surname><given-names> R.L. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NATH</surname><given-names> K.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2000)<article-title>DEKA, R.L. AND NATH, K.K.  RAINFALL ANALYSIS FOR RAINFED CROP PLANNING IN THE UPPER BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY ZONE OF ASSAM</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 47</fpage>-<lpage>53</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>HUNDAL</surname><given-names> S.S. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KAUR</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2002)<article-title>HUNDAL, S.S. AND KAUR, P.  ANNUAL AND SEASONAL CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AT DIFFERENT LOCATION OF PUNJAB STATE</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 113</fpage>-<lpage>125</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>AHMED</surname><given-names> P.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DEKA</surname><given-names> R.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BARUAH</surname><given-names> B.P. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NATH</surname><given-names> K.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2009)<article-title>AHMED, P., DEKA, R.L., BARUAH, B.P. AND NATH, K.K.  RAINFALL BASED CROP PLANNING IN THE BARAK VALLEY ZONE OF ASSAM</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 192</fpage>-<lpage>195</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>RAVINDRABABU</surname><given-names> B.T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAJEGOWDA</surname><given-names> M.B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> JANARDHANAGOWDA</surname><given-names> N.A. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GIRISH</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (2010)<article-title>RAVINDRABABU, B.T., RAJEGOWDA, M.B., JANARDHANAGOWDA, N.A. AND GIRISH, J.  WEEKLY, MONTHLY AND SEASONAL RAINFALL AT BENGALURU IN KARNATAKA</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY</source><volume> 12</volume>,<fpage> 263</fpage>-<lpage>265</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">PANSE, V.G. AND SUKHATME, P.V. (1985) STATISTICAL METHODS FOR AGRICULTURE WORKERS. ICAR, NEW DELHI, 14-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WMO (1966) WMO TECHNICAL NOTE 79. WMO NO. 195, TP-10, GENEVA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ROBERTSON, G.W. (1976) DRY AND WET SPELLS. UNDP/FAO, TON RAZAK AGRIC. RES. CENTER, TEKAM, MALAYSIA PROJECT FIELD REPORT, AGROMETEOROLOGICAL, A-6, SUNGH, 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CHOW, V.T. (1964) STATISTICAL AND PROBABILITY ANALYSIS OF HYDROLOGICAL DATA. IN: CHOW, V.T., ED., HAND BOOK OF APPLIED HYDROLOGY, MCGRAW HILL, NEW YOK, 81-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>HINGANE</surname><given-names> L.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RUPAKUMAR</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> RAMANAMURTHY</surname><given-names> B.V. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1985</year>)<article-title>LONG-TERM TRENDS OF SURFACE AIR TEMPERATURE IN INDIA</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOLOGY</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 521</fpage>-<lpage>528</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1002/JOC.3370050505</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>RUPAKUMAR</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> HINGANE</surname><given-names> L.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1988</year>)<article-title>LONG-TERM VARIATIONS OF SURFACE AIR TEMPERATURES AT MAJOR INDUSTRIAL CITIES OF INDIA</article-title><source>. CLIMATIC CHANGE</source><volume> 13</volume>,<fpage> 287</fpage>-<lpage>307</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1007/BF00139811</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48112-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">REDDY, J. (1993) AGROCLIMATIC/AGROMETEOROLOGICAL TECHNIQUES: AS APPLICABLE TO DRY-LAND AGRICULTURE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. JEEVAN CHARITABLE TRUST, SECUNDARABAD, 61.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>