This is a descriptive retrospective study.

It took place over a period of 7 years: from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2016.

Included in this study were all patients received during our investigation period at the Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department of the National Hospital Center of Pikine who had been the victim of suspected or certain sexual abuse and with or without judicial requisition.

Not all patients who consulted for genital trauma without sexual abuse and those with incomplete records were included in our study.

In each case, the following parameters were studied: epidemiological characteristics (age, gestation, parity and place of residence), circumstances of the assault (time and place), characteristics of the perpetrator (age, relationship to the victim, number of perpetrators), type of sexual contact, any lesions found during the physical examination (genital and extra-genital), the method of admission, the time limit for consultation, the attitude after sexual abuse, the gynaecological and obstetrical status of the victim, the impact and psychological follow-up, the paraclinical assessment, the treatments administered. The data were collected using a survey sheet and analyzed using the SPSS software.

This study has been approved by the local ethics committee.

Emergency contraception was prescribed for 47% of victims who were in genital activity. After the clinical examination, 17% of the victims had received antibiotic prophylaxis; 15.8% and 39.3% had received analgesic and antiseptic treatment respectively. Prevention of HIV infection by prescribing antiretrovirals was effective in 17% of cases and antitetanus serovaccination concerned only 7.5% of them. Psychological care was provided to only 11.5% of victims. In terms of surgical management, 2.7% of victims had received it (Table 6).

The frequency of sexual abuse represented 0.46% of all patients received during the study period. This value is almost identical to that obtained in 2006 in Senegal by Traoré [5] who reported a frequency of 0.4%. This rate is relatively low compared to data from foreign literature; in France, the rate is reported to have increased from 0.8% to 1.2% between 1997 and 2000 [2]. In the United States, Lisak and Miller reported a 39% incidence of sexual abuse in 2002 among the general population [6]. In Mali in 2002, Traoré noted a hospital frequency equivalent to 2.4% [5].

Senegal’s particularity reflects above all the lack of public awareness of the need to use health facilities for case reporting and the influence of socio-cultural principles that make it a taboo subject.

In our study, minors accounted for 81.4% of victims of sexual abuse. Those aged 11 to 15 years were more represented. The average age was 13 years. This high representativeness of minors was noted by several authors [7] [8] [9]. This is the case of Traoré, who had detected an average age of 14 years for victims [5]. In another study conducted by Cissé et al. in 2015, 92.64% of victims were minors [4]. Mbaye [10] in 1990, in a study on child abuse in Senegal, made the same observation with a predominance of the 11 to 15 age group. According to Lisak [11] in France, the victims were most often aged between 3 and 6 years old and their average age was 9 years. For this phenomenon of sexual abuse, underage girls are therefore a vulnerable segment of society. This can be explained by the fact that they are immature, docile and easily manipulated, without any decision-making power. They are totally dependent and therefore subject to blackmail or threats that force them to submit to the abuser’s wishes, especially if the abuser is a person with authority over them.

In more than half of the cases (54.6%), the time of sexual abuse was not specified. Maybe because the victims being minors didn’t know the clock. But also some victims who have suffered repeated sexual abuse (19.7% of cases) at various times may have difficulty providing an accurate time. Among the victims, 23.4% were abused during working hours between 7a.m. and 6p.m. This observation was made by several authors [12] [13]. Why this rapprochement? Certainly because children at these times are separated from their parents due to their parents’ professional constraints. Or even because the victims were at school, thus escaping parental control. A study was conducted in Yaoundé by Mbassa [14] in 2002 to estimate the prevalence of sexual abuse in schools and to clarify the actual participation of teachers; at the end of this study, the results were alarming: almost 15% of cases of sexual abuse had occurred in a school environment and 30% were perpetrated by classmates; teachers and tutors represented 7.9% and 7.3% of aggressors respectively. In South Africa, teachers have been found guilty of at least one-third of child rape [15]. In Senegal, a study carried out in some schools reveals that 62% of girls have been sexually abused [16]. According to Jaspard [17], the consequences for the girl are enormous: apart from injuries, pregnancies and clandestine abortions, there is also a lack of interest in school, fear of being laughed at by others, lowering the level, etc. These results support and make it necessary to set up a programme to prevent such acts in schools. It should also be noted that in our series, 19.7% of the abuses took place between 7 p.m. and 1 a.m., which is still not negligible. This means that the risk of sexual abuse is permanent, hence the importance of vigilance. This also reflects the insecurity in the suburbs of Dakar, which is exacerbated by the lack of public lighting and the idleness of young people, among others.

In our study, we found that sexual abuse often took place outside the family (60.7%), perpetrated by a single person (92.3% of cases) often unidentified by the victim (74.9%). The assailant was known in only 25.1% of cases: he was either a neighbour (11.4%), a parent (5%), a lover (5.4%) or a figure of authority (employer, teacher, traditional healer) in 3.3% of cases. In France, Cazanave-Robert [18] is not going in this direction! According to his study, the family home was the main place where sexual abuse occurred and the often known perpetrators were in the family circle in the majority of cases (48.2%). The intra-family origin of sexual abuse was a minority in our series (5%); however, these figures may not reflect reality if we know that this aspect is on the one hand, often to preserve family balance, and on the other hand, it is strongly repressed by the society in which we live. The main problem with domestic violence is the difficulty of identifying it.

Genito-genital contact remained the most frequent modality of sexual contact with a high vaginal penetration rate (70.5%). Most of the minors (65.8%) had undergone vaginal penetrations, especially those over 11 years of age. These rates are similar to those of Traoré [5] and Cissé [4] in Senegal, who had found 67.3% and 61% of vaginal penetrations respectively. This high rate of vaginal penetration among minors could be explained by the fact that they are easily manipulated and do not have the strength to resist such rape attempts. These results once again justify the need to systematically prevent the occurrence of sexually transmitted infections, HIV infection and unwanted pregnancies among victims of sexual abuse.

The interrogation revealed that most of the victims (79.2%) had come to consult, with a judicial requisition. Diametrically opposed to Traoré’s results [5], in which only 15.2% of victims had come by requisition. Sexual abuse is an act condemned by Senegalese law, its perpetrators are subject to severe penalties. Denouncing the latter through the judicial authority is an effective means of eradicating this phenomenon because it makes it possible to avoid recurrences but also to deter potential aggressors. Victims should be further encouraged to report their aggressors to the judicial authority. Let us assume that in some cases of intra-family sexual abuse, it is extremely difficult for the victim to lodge a complaint against the perpetrator because there is a risk of reprisals or family dislocation.

Victims most often came to see a doctor before the 4th day after the sexual abuse (58.5%). This is not to be underestimated, but efforts to raise awareness still need to be made to reduce the delay, taking into account the need to prevent certain complications and to take samples in an emergency. Many victims suffer from this silent drama often because they are ashamed or want to preserve family balance when the perpetrator is a family member. The lack of knowledge of medical confidentiality is another factor that may explain this delay in consultation. Hence the need for information work with young people to gain their trust, but also the need to set up specialised structures to deal with cases of sexual abuse with the greatest discretion, such as medical and legal services [16].

In our series, several cases of genital trauma were noted. These were mainly hymen lesions (66.1%) with old lesions predominating (42.6%). This same observation was made by Traoré [5] in 2006, who had found 70.9% of hypermenial lesions with 54.5% being old. This is often explained by a longer consultation period in our context. Other vulvar (18.6%), vaginal (1.1%) and perineal (0.5%) traumas are not to be neglected and should be sought if necessary on examination because they sometimes cause bleeding.

The psychological behavior of the victims was considered apparently normal for most (94%). The few victims affected by anxiety were pre-pubescent (1.6%), the others (4.5%) older were in genital activity. These misleading appearances would explain the low rate of victims (11.5%) who received psychological care. But knowledge of the real risk of psychological repercussions in the long term, leading to, among other things, social conduct disorders, would allow practitioners to give an important place to psychological care [19]. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (Appendix 2) is a very important diagnostic tool to provide much more precision on the level of anxiety of victims. It would also be interesting to experiment with certain models of psycho-social care for victims of incest [2] based on their grouping into an association where they are received with compassion, allowing them, through projects and activities, to regain their self-esteem and dignity in order to reintegrate into society [18].

More than 80% of the victims had received retroviral serology, HBs Antigenemia, syphilitic serology and vaginal sampling for mycoplasma and chlamydia. This is due to the high rate of vaginal penetration. Cytological samples are rarely requested (1.6%) perhaps because most of the victims had taken a shower (60.7%) or the sexual assault was old. As for the results of the initial assessment and the three-month HIV serology tests, none were mentioned. This is certainly due to the fact that once the certificate of medical expertise was issued, almost all the victims were lost sight of because they were much more interested in the judicial aspect than in therapeutic care. And in the absence of defloration, they were no longer interested in the medical aspect. This same aspect was found by Sy [19] who found that less than half (48.8%) of sexual assault victims returned for follow-up assessment.

In our study, 17% of victims had received antiretroviral prophylaxis. This rate seems relatively low compared to the percentage of penetration victims. This is just because some victims came after the effective triple therapy period was over. However, many cases of HIV/AIDS infection after rape have been reported, particularly by Marsaud [1] in South Africa (78%). Hence the need once again to raise awareness to reduce consultation times.

Antibioprophylaxis was prescribed in 17% of cases. It must then be guided by the results of the samples, which must be available at short notice.

Almost all of the victims who received surgical care (2.7%) had not yet reached puberty age, making them more vulnerable to trauma due to their sexual immaturity.

Only 23.5% of our patients had received emergency contraception, thus avoiding the risk of unwanted pregnancy, unlike others (8.7%) who were forced to carry their pregnancies to term since voluntary termination of pregnancy is prohibited by Senegalese legislation according to article 35 of the Code of Ethics [4] [7] [11] which stipulates that “therapeutic abortion may only be performed if this intervention is the only way to save the mother’s life”. But we note that in recent years in Senegal, struggles have been waged by non-governmental organizations and some civil society organizations for the legalization of abortion. For these activists, legalizing abortion will reduce the number of maternal deaths due to clandestine abortions and also reduce the number of cases of infanticide. Another key issue for advocates of legalizing abortion is Senegal’s ratification of the Maputo Protocol in its article 14 (2003), which would oblige our country to allow abortion for women who are victims of rape and incest or whose lives are threatened because of the pregnancy they carry. In this case, how could the practitioner state with certainty that the alleged victim was actually a victim of rape or should he or she only be satisfied with the speech of the alleged victim? We must accept that opening such a gap risks seeing all possible and imaginable abuses [13]. It would therefore be necessary above all to lead the fight against sexual abuse, to raise awareness among the population of the need for early consultations to ensure better care. The constitution of our country in its article 7 stipulates that: The human person is sacred. It is inviolable. The state has an obligation to respect and protect it. Everyone has the right to life, liberty, security, the free development of his personality, bodily integrity, including protection against all forms of physical mutilation. Life, the beginning of which is dated from conception, is a long process made up of multiple movements and sequences, each as important as the next. From the moment the male and female gametes meet, there is no more discontinuity between this first moment of fertilization and what each of us has become to this day [12]. In other words, if this process were interrupted for all of us, humanity would be devastated today. This is also why any damage to an embryo, whatever its age of gestation, could be considered as an attack against a human being and against humanity as a whole [15].

One of its limitations is the retrospective nature of the study. The examination is not carried out by a single staff.