<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2020.104011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS-99591</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Activated Milt Residence Time on Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Egg Survival
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jessica</surname><given-names>Shannon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nathan</surname><given-names>Huysman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jill</surname><given-names>M. Voorhees</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eric</surname><given-names>Krebs</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>E. Barnes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Game, Fish and Parks, McNenny State Fish Hatchery, Spearfish, South Dakota, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>141</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  During artificial spawning of salmonids, activated sperm is allowed to remain in contact with eggs for variable durations. This study examined multiple residence times (20, 40, 60, 90, or 120 seconds) for activated sperm on lan
  dlocked fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) eggs during 
  spawning. There was no significant difference in egg survival to the
   eyed-stage of development or to hatch among any of the treatments, with a mean (SE) percent survival to the eyed stage of 63.9 (5.8). These results indicate that only relatively short residence times of activated milt on eggs during landlocked fall Chinook salmon spawning are needed to ensure egg survival, resulting in potentially substantial reductions in production-level spawning times and associated labor costs.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Chinook Salmon</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus tshawytscha&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Milt</kwd><kwd> Eggs</kwd><kwd> Spawning</kwd><kwd> Sperm</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>During artificial spawning of salmonids, eggs and milt are manually removed from the fish, mixed in a pan, and water is added to initiate fertilization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref1">1</xref>]. Sperm are inactive in milt, and only become motile upon contact with water, ovarian fluid, or other solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref3">3</xref>]. After activation, motile sperm can swim through the micropyle and fertilize the egg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref4">4</xref>]. The duration of sperm motility lasts from several seconds to two minutes depending on species and other factors such as water temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref9">9</xref>]. To maximize the possibility of fertilization, residence times of the milt with the eggs after the addition of water have historically ranged from 2 to 15 minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Landlocked fall Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha eggs from Lake Oahe, South Dakota exhibit extremely variable, and frequently poor, survival during hatchery incubation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref12">12</xref>]. In an attempt to improve spawning efficiencies and maximize egg survival, several components of the spawning process have previously been investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref14">14</xref>]. However, the duration of milt residence times has not previously been examined. Typically, milt has been allowed to remain in contact with the eggs for two minutes after water activation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref16">16</xref>]. But, Lake Oahe salmon sperm motility ranges from 29 to 76 seconds, which is considerably less than two minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref8">8</xref>]. If sperm motility has ceased before two minutes, waiting for two minutes before rinsing is unnecessary. During spawning operations involving large numbers of females, considerable time savings could be realized if the milt-egg-water residence time could be reduced. Immediately after fertilization, egg membrane separation and rapid water infusion begins (water-hardening), and egg sensitivity to shock dramatically increase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref17">17</xref>]. It is possible that by allowing the milt and water mixture to be in contact with the eggs for two minutes, the process of rinsing the milt from the eggs at that time is contributing to egg mortality. Thus, the objective of this experiment was to investigate the effect of activated milt duration time on landlocked fall Chinook salmon egg survival.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>Initial experimentation occurred at Whitlock’s Spawning Station adjacent to Lake Oahe, South Dakota, USA, on October 29, 2019 using landlock fall Chinook salmon that ascended the fish ladder. Milt from individual ripe males was collected manually and stored discretely in 50 mL centrifuge tubes on ice until used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref8">8</xref>]. Eggs from individual females were pneumatically removed using compressed oxygen at low pressure into a suspended net to allow the ovarian fluid to drain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref14">14</xref>]. A sample of approximately 100 eggs was removed from the spawn and 20 eggs from this sample were then placed into each of five 13 &#215; 13 &#215; 5 cm (length &#215; width &#215; depth) plastic containers. Ten mL of milt was then added to each container on top of the eggs, followed by 200 mL of lake water (8˚C; total hardness as CaCO<sub>3</sub>, 220 mg/L; alkalinity as CaCO<sub>3</sub>, 160 mg/L; pH, 8.2; total dissolved solids, 440 mg/L) for sperm activation. Five activated sperm residence time treatments were used (one per container), with rinsing of the potentially fertilized eggs occurring at 20, 40, 60, 90, or 120 seconds after placement of the water in the container.</p><p>Rinsing occurred by pouring the container contents into a strainer to allow the excess milt and water to drain, and then gently immersing the strainer holding the eggs twice into fresh lake water. After rinsing, the eggs and approximately 500 mL of fresh lake water were placed into a 950 mL plastic bag for water-hardening and subsequent shipment for incubation. This process was repeated for eggs from 12 females, with each group of eggs from each female and treatment maintained discretely throughout the experiment.</p><p>After one hour, the water-hardened eggs were transported in coolers with ice (four hours) to McNenny State Fish Hatchery, rural Spearfish, SD, USA. After arrival at the hatchery, 15 eggs per bag were randomly placed into labelled (10 cm) petri dishes containing 7 mL of hatchery water (11˚C; total hardness as CaCO<sub>3</sub>, 360 mg/L; alkalinity as CaCO<sub>3</sub>, 210 mg/L; pH, 7.6; total dissolved solids, 390 mg/L). The petri dishes of eggs were then placed into refrigeration units (Wine Enthusiasts, Valhalla, NY; New Air, Orange County, California) and incubated at 10 ˚C using the techniques described by Neumiller, Blain, and Barnes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref18">18</xref>]. Water was changed weekly during the first 28 days of incubation and then every three days thereafter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref18">18</xref>]. Mortalities were removed in conjunction with water changes. Percent survival to the eyed stage of development (incubation day 32) and percent hatch were calculated using the following formulas:</p><p>Eye-up   ( % ) = 100 &#215; [ ( Initial egg number   ( 15 ) − Egg mortality to Day 32 ) / Initial egg number ]</p><p>Hatch   ( % ) = 100 &#215; [ Number of hatched fry / Initial egg number ]</p><p>Because the percentage data were not normally distributed, data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with the SPSS (9.0) statistical program (IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Significance was pre-determined at P &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Percent survival of the eyed stage of egg development was not significantly different among any of the fertilization treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Survival to eye up for the spawns from individual females ranged from 20 to 100%, with a mean (SE) percent survival across all treatments of 63.9 (5.8). Percent survival to hatch was also not significantly different among the treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The results indicate that egg survival was not affected by activated sperm residence times as short as 20 seconds. This is not surprising given that the motile phase of freshwater fish sperm in general lasts less than two minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref19">19</xref>]. Furthermore, the typical motile phase for Lake Oahe Chinook salmon sperm is less</p><p>than one minute [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref8">8</xref>], and sperm motility in other salmonid species can be even less than 20 seconds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref9">9</xref>]. With micropyle closure occurring when the eggs are immersed in water at the same time as sperm motility is activated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref7">7</xref>], fertilization must occur quickly.</p><p>Given the short duration of sperm motility after activation, longer sperm residence times on the eggs during artificial spawning are likely not needed. Numerous published studies and reference documents have either used, or recommend, activated milt residence times of up to 15 minutes, with two minutes somewhat established as the standard time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref21">21</xref>]. The results of this study, validating the use of residence times as short as 20 seconds, is only slightly shorter than the 30 seconds successfully used by Burrows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref22">22</xref>]. By decreasing the amount of time between milt activation and rinsing from 120 seconds to 20 seconds, dramatic reductions in the overall time required for artificial spawning of salmonids could be realized. For example, a typical Lake Oahe Chinook salmon spawning event with 100 individual females would include 200 minutes of milt residence time using two minutes per female. By reducing milt residence times to 20 seconds per spawn, less than 34 minutes overall would be required, resulting in a time savings of nearly 90 minutes for each person involved in the spawning process.</p><p>The results of this study may have been influenced by the water temperatures used during milt activation. Salmonid sperm motility is influenced by temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref23">23</xref>], with motility durations decreasing at higher temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref4">4</xref>]. Vladić and J&#228;trvi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref24">24</xref>] reported that sperm motility in two salmonid species peaked near 3˚C to 4˚C. With this study using 8˚C water, the results should be applicable to Lake Oahe salmon spawning in more typical water temperatures of 11˚C or greater.</p><p>It is also possible that the relative abundance of eggs and milt in this study may make these results less applicable to production-level spawning operations. While the eggs one-layer deep in the experimental containers used in this study is also normally used during the actual spawning of landlocked fall Chinook salmon at Whitlocks Spawning Station, the ratio of 1 mL of milt to 1.5 eggs is not. Rather, 50 mL of milt is typically used to fertilize the eggs from one female (approximately 3000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref12">12</xref>], or a ratio of 1 mL of milt to 60 eggs. Although very little milt is needed to ensure fertilization success [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99591-ref25">25</xref>], further experimentation at a larger scale is obviously needed to support the results of this study for use at a production level.</p><p>In conclusion, this study demonstrates that relatively short residence times of activated milt on eggs during landlocked fall Chinook salmon spawning are needed to ensure egg survival. While substantial reductions in production-level spawning times and associated labor could be realized by decreasing milt residence times from established norms, additional larger-scale research is warranted.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Aaron Chapman, Angel Nunez, and the spawning crew at Whitlock’s Spawning Station for their assistance with this project.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shannon, J., Huysman, N., Voorhees, J.M., Krebs, E. and Barnes, M.E. (2020) Effect of Activated Milt Residence Time on Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Egg Survival. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2020.104011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.99591-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piper, R.G., McElwain, I.B., Orme, L.E., McCraren, J.P., Fowler, L.G. and Leonard, J.R. (1982) Fish Hatchery Management. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gallego, V. and Asturiano, F.J. (2019) Fish Sperm Motility Assessment as a Tool for Aquaculture Research: A Historical Approach. Reviews in Aquaculture, 11, 697-724.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12253</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rurangwa, E., Kime, D.E., Ollevier, F. and Nash, J.P. (2004) The Measurement of Sperm Motility and Factors Affecting Sperm Quality in Cultured Fish. Aquaculture, 234, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Billard, R. and Cosson, M.P. (1992) Some Problems Related to the Assessment of Sperm Motility in Freshwater Fish. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 261, 122-131.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402610203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christen, R., Gatti, J.-L. and Billard, R. (1987) The Transient Movement of Trout Sperm Is Related to Changes in Concentration of ATP Following the Activation of the Flagellar Movement. European Journal of Biochemistry, 166, 667-671.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13565.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fitzpatrick J.L., Henry, J.C., Liley, N.R. and Devlin, R.H. (2005) Sperm Characteristics and Fertilization Success of Masculinized Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture, 249, 459-468.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ginsburg</surname><given-names> A.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1963</year>)<article-title>Sperm-Egg Association and Its Relationship to the Activation of the Egg in Salmonid Fishes</article-title><source> Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 13</fpage>-<lpage>33</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reese, S.E., Long, A.J., Meyer, H.A. and Barnes, M.E. (2017) Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Motility after Short Term Milt Storage. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 3, 9-13.  
https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-7670.0301002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yanagimachi, R., Cherr, G N., Pillai, M.C. and Baldwin, J.D. (1992) Factors Controlling Sperm Entry into Micropyles of Salmonid and Herring Eggs. Development, Growth &amp; Differentiation, 34, 447-461.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.1992.00447.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barnes, M.E., Hanten, R.P., Cordes, R.J., Sayler, W.A. and Carreiro, J. (2000) Reproductive Performance of Inland Fall Chinook Salmon. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 62, 203-211.  
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8454(2000)062&lt;0203:RPOIFC&gt;2.3.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vladic, T.V., Afzelius, B.A. and Bronnikov, G.E. (2002) Sperm Quality as Reflected Through Morphology in Salmon Alternative Life Histories. Biology of Reproduction, 66, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.98</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, K.L., Barnes, M.E. and Kientz, J.L. (2016) Reproductive Characteristics of Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon from Lake Oahe, South Dakota. Prairie Naturalist, 48, 79-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huysman, N., Voorhees, J.M., Meyer, H., Krebs, E. and Barnes, M.E. (2018) Electrofishing Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Broodstock Negatively Impacts Egg Survival. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 80, 411-417.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/naaq.10058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wipf, M., Barnes, M.E. and Durben, D.J. (2011) An Evaluation of Two Egg Collection and Two Fertilization Techniques during Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Spawning. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 73, 339-342.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2011.603966</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huysman, N., Voorhees, J.M., Meyer, H., Krebs, E. and Barnes, M.E. (2019) Timing of Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Spawning and Egg Survival. International Journal of Aquaculture and Fishery Sciences, 5, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krebs, W., Krebs, E., Huysman, N. and Barnes, M.E. (2018) Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Egg Size Is Positively Related to Hatching Time. International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology, 6, 41-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jensen, J.O.T. and Alderdice, D.F. (1989) Comparison of Mechanical Shock Sensitivity of Eggs of Five Pacific Salmon (Oncorhynchus) Species and Steelhead Trout (Salmo gairdneri). Aquaculture, 78, 163-181. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90030-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neumiller, H.K., Blain, G.A. and Barnes, M E. (2017) Incubation of Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Eggs in Petri Dishes. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 79, 183-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2017.1281854</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadiseh, D., Dzyuba, B., Cosson, J., Golpour, A., Siddique, M.A.M. and Linhart, O. (2017) Effects of Water Temperature on the Physiology of Fish Spermatozoon Function: A Brief Review. Aquaculture Research, 48, 729-740.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alaska Department of Fish and Game (1983) Fish Culture Manual. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, AK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campbell, P.M., Pottinger, T.G. and Sumpter, J.P. (1992) Stress Reduces the Quality of Gametes Produced by Rainbow Trout. Biology of Reproduction, 47, 1140-1150.  
https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod47.6.1140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burrows, R.E. (1949) Recommended Methods for Fertilization, Transportation, and Care of Salmon Eggs. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 11, 175-178.  
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1949)11[175:RMFFTA]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alavi, S.M.H. and Cosson, J. (2005) Sperm Motility in Fishes. I. Effects of Temperature and pH: A Review. Cell Biology International, 29, 101-110.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2004.11.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vladic, T. and Jatrvi, T. (1997) Sperm Motility and Fertilization Time Span in Atlantic Salmon and Brown Trout—The Effect of Water Temperature. Journal of Fish Biology, 50, 1088-1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01632.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99591-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poon, D.C. and Johnson, A.K. (1970) The Effect of Delayed Fertilization on Transported Salmon Eggs. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 32, 81-84.  
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8640(1970)32[81:TEODFO]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>