<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Earthquake Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-9623</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojer.2020.93013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJER-99387</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Estimation of Curie Point Depth (CPD) across the Pan African Belt in Northern Cameroon from Aeromagnetic Data
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Daniel Ngoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Théophile</surname><given-names>Ndougsa Mbarga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kevin</surname><given-names>Mickus</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yara</surname><given-names>Tarek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tabod</surname><given-names>Charles Tabod</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Geography Geology and Planning, Missouri State University, Springf&amp;amp;#305eld, MO, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Postgraduate School of Science, Technology and Geosciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Advanced Teachers’ Training College, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Faculty of Science, University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Exploration Department, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>217</fpage><lpage>239</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The depth to the Curie isothermal point (CPD) was estimated using aeromagnetic data from northern Cameroon. The CPD was estimated using a two-dimensional power density spectral analysis of nineteen 30 &#215; 30 km blocks over a series of Neoproterozoic lithologies associated with the Pan African orogeny. The results show that there are two main regions characterized by the CPD analysis: 1) Shallow depths (~6.37 - 10.09 km) which are located in several regions including the northern portions of the study area (toward the regions of Hina Marbak, Gawel and northern Moutouroua), the southeast (Kaele region), the south (Guider) and the southwest (Mayo Oulo), and 2) deeper depths (~10.68 - 13.72 km) are located in the northeast (Mindif) and southwest (southern Moutouroua, Guider and Bossoum). The shallow depths can be related to two tectonic regimes: 1) the West-Central African Rift System with northeast-trending strike-slip faults emanating from the Gulf of Guinea and 2) the Cameroon Volcanic Line. However, the ultimate source of these shallow regions is interpreted to be related to the Cameroon Volcanic Line based on low seismic velocities imaged by recent broadband seismic studies which are concentrated along the northeast-trending strike-slip faults. An additional finding using the CPD depths, a Curie isothermal temperature of 580
  &amp;#176C and a one-dimensional heat flow model, was heat-flow values ranging from 105.68 to 227.63 mW/m
  <sup>2</sup>, which are above average global heat flow values and are therefore indicative of potential geothermal resources.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Magnetic Anomaly</kwd><kwd> Spectral Analysis</kwd><kwd> Curie Point Depth</kwd><kwd> Geothermal Gradi-ent</kwd><kwd> Heat Flow</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The thermal structure of the lithosphere is required for many geodynamic investigations, including the deformation of rocks, boundaries of mineral phase changes, and rates of geochemical reactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref1">1</xref>]. Geothermal gradients are commonly estimated from near-surface heat-flow measurements, but heat-flow measurements are commonly unavailable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref3">3</xref>], are distributed randomly, and may be affected by local thermal anomalies. In Cameroon, there are no heat flow data and the nearest heat flow data publicly available is in northern Nigeria. In regions where heat-flow data are sparse or unavailable, geophysical and geochemical methods can be used to estimate the thermal structure. For the geophysical methods, one can use magnetotellurics, magnetics, and seismic velocity to indirectly determine the presence of high heat flow values. Magnetotellurics and seismic velocity only indirectly infer the presence of higher temperatures by low electrical conductivities or low seismic velocities but do not provide temperature estimations. The magnetic method can determine the depth to the Curie point depth (CPD) where these depths can be used to estimate the regional heat flow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>The CPD is the bottom of a magnetic susceptibility source where the magnetic minerals lose their permanent magnetism at a temperature of approximately 580˚C for magnetite which is the most common magnetic mineral. Magnetic anomalies can be used to study magnetic susceptibility structure above the CPD and the depth of the magnetic susceptibility sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref5">5</xref>]. Once the CPD is estimated, the geothermal gradient can be determined and used to estimate the heat flow using commonly accepted thermal properties of the lithologies in a given region. The use of aeromagnetic data to estimate the CPD is not new and has been used in various tectonic environments, either by using spectral methods or forward and inverse modelling of magnetic anomalies. In the spectral methods, there are a wide variety of techniques including calculating the spectrum of an anomaly using one-dimensional (1D) spectral methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref6">6</xref>], using two-dimensional (2D) spectral methods over a region of magnetic data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref8">8</xref>] or fractal methods based spectral methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref9">9</xref>]. In the forward and/or inverse methods, one can use 2D methods to model isolated anomalies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref10">10</xref>] or three-dimensional (3D) inversion of magnetic anomalies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref12">12</xref>] to determine the bottom of magnetic susceptibility sources. One must remember with all of these methods, that one is determining the bottom of a magnetic susceptibility source and the solutions must still be assessed with outside geological and geophysical constraints to determine if the value obtained for the bottom of the source is lithological or related to temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Magnetic studies in Cameroon have generally focused on regional geological structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref15">15</xref>], oil and gas exploration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref16">16</xref>], and mineral exploration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref17">17</xref>]. There have been many tectonic studies that have used geological [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref18">18</xref>], gravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref19">19</xref>] and seismic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref21">21</xref>] data to study the tectonic evolution of Cameroon but most have mainly been involved investigation the Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL). To date, there have been no studies involving the determination of the CPD or heat flow studies within Northern Cameroon.</p><p>In this study, we apply the fractal-based spectral method to magnetic anomalies over the NeoProterozoic Pan African region that has been affected by both the Mesozoic rifting of the West-Central African Rift System (WCARS) and the volcanism of the CVL in northern Cameroon to estimate the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources throughout this region. These depths will be further analysed to determine how they are related to the CDP and will be the first heat flow estimates reported for northern Cameroon. Furthermore, these magnetic anomalies, depths to the bottom of the magnetic susceptibility sources and the heat flow estimates will be used to infer lithospheric structures related to the Pan African orogeny.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Geological and Tectonic Setting</title><p>The tectonic setting of north-western Cameroon includes Pan African collision tectonics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref14">14</xref>], Cretaceous rifting forming the WCARS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref23">23</xref>] and the CVL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref24">24</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref31">31</xref>]. The dominant outcropping lithologies of north-western Cameroon are Proterozoic metamorphic, igneous and sedimentary units related to the Pan African orogeny of central Africa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). This orogeny consists of a mobile belt formed by the collision of several Precambrian terranes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>]. The Pan African belt in Cameroon is bordered on the south by the Congo Craton and by the Benue Trough on the north-northwest. The belt was formed by tectonic interactions of portions of the West African and Congo Cratons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). These interactions are first represented by eastward dipping subduction in eastern Cameroon followed by a collision between the Nigerian Shield and the West African Craton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref14">14</xref>]. However, the tectonic evolution along the northern border of the Congo Craton still rises questions due to the lack of oceanic rocks, but structural and geochemical evidence points to a collisional boundary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref27">27</xref>]. This lack of agreement has led to a number of different tectonic models that all involve collision between various blocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref29">29</xref>]. Additionally, at least two major strike-slip tectonic episodes have been reported that are neither coeval nor post-date the major collisional events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>] but are most likely related to the collision between the Congo Craton and some blocks to the northwest of the craton.</p><p>The Pan African belt in Cameroon consists of three main lithological units: 1) the Poli-Lere Group, 2) the Adamawa Domain and the 3) Yaounde Group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). Of these, the Poli-Lere Group is the most prevalent within the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) with the Adamawa Group occurring in the southern portion of the study area. The Neoproterozoic Poli-Lere Group consists of volcanic and sedimentary origin medium- to high-grade schists and gneisses, formed in a magmatic arc context probably within a back-arc basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref29">29</xref>] and that pre-, syn- and post-Pan African tectonic calc-alkaline granitoids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref30">30</xref>]. Post-Pan African tectonic alkaline granitoids contain mafic and felsic dykes that are cross-cut by intrusive granites and syenites. These intrusions intrude the schists and gneisses, and form a NNW-trending line of batholiths [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref14">14</xref>]. Overlying the above units are unmetamorphosed sediments and volcanic rocks contained in several small basins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>Three tectonic events affected the structural development of northern Cameroon, particularly the Poli area. These include a crustal shortening and thickening event caused by collision between Neoproterozoic blocks followed by syn to post-orogenic shear tectonic movements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>]. The crustal shortening event is seen as gentle folding outcropping in isoclinal folds with flat-lying foliations which were formed by thrust faulting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>]. Later compressional deformation formed vertical and NNE-trending foliations, and tight upright to recline folds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref32">32</xref>].</p><p>The tectonic phase of compression and late stage shear zone development was followed by NE-SW to N-S sinistral shear zones. The Tchollire-Banyo (TBSZ), Gode-Gormaya (GGSZ), and Balche (BSZ) shear zones are the major sinistral shear zones that are mainly represented by mylonites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). The BSZ is classified by a secondary shear zone that cuts across the GGSZ but these are considered coeval with the NE-trending shear zones despite trending in a different direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>The WCARS is a series of extensional and transtensional basins that extend from Nigeria and Cameroon eastwards into Chad through Kenya and northwards through Lake Chad into southern Algeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref23">23</xref>]. These basins were active [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref22">22</xref>] and, in Nigeria and Cameroon are represented by the thick clastic sediments of the Benue Trough (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). Within the study area, the Cretaceous clastic sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref33">33</xref>] and alkaline plutonic and volcanic rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref34">34</xref>] are scattered throughout the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). The origin of the alkali igneous rocks is controversial, but most models are related to one or two hot spots in the Mesozoic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>The CVL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)) overlies the Proterozoic basement in Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref21">21</xref>] and covers over a 1600 km long Y-shaped trend of Cenozoic volcanoes that extend to the southern extent of the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). These volcanoes and sub-volcanic complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref24">24</xref>] trend from the ocean-continent boundary in the Gulf of Guinea into the northern Cameroon. The volcanoes consist of mainly alkali basalts and some more evolved phonolites and trachytes with an inferred asthenospheric source [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref21">21</xref>]. Seismic studies indicate that low velocity nearly vertical P- and S-wave zones extend to at least 300 km in depth beneath the CVL, suggesting that edge flow convection against the Congo Craton may be responsible for these anomalies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref25">25</xref>]. These low velocity zones are more prevalent in western and northwestern Cameroon implying that these regions might be more susceptible to future volcanic eruptions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Aeromagnetic Data</title><p>A series of aeromagnetic surveys were carried out in 1970 by SURVAIR with a flight height above the topography of 235 m and 750 m flight line spacings oriented at N˚135. Each individual survey was corrected for diurnal variations and was gridded into one coherent dataset. Then the regional magnetic field of the Earth or the IGRF (International Geomagnetic Reference Field) was removed from the dataset to produce a residual magnetic dataset. Then the residual magnetic dataset was gridded at a 0.75 km spacing interval and displayed as a color image (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Next, the gridded TMI data were reduced to the equator (RTE) using inclination and declination angles of the IGRF of January 1, 1970 of −1.01˚ and −3.96˚, respectively. The RTE anomaly map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) contains both small wavelength anomalies, high amplitude anomalies formed by magnetic lithologies at the surface or at depths near the surface, and longer wavelength anomalies related to deeper magnetic sources. To amplify the effect of the deeper source or longer wavelength anomalies, the RTE data were upward continued to 1 km above the Earth’s surface. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the upward continued RTE map.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Spectral Analysis</title><p>Numerical modelling of magnetic data has been used to determine the depth of magnetic interfaces including the Curie point depth (CPD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref35">35</xref>]. Spectral methods involve a number of different methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref36">36</xref>]. In either case, the 2D power spectrum methods are the most used methods in analysing Curie Point Depths and will be used in our study as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref35">35</xref>] showed that these methods are more appropriate for the analysis of regional magnetic anomalies than forward and inverse modelling. While all the above methods can determine a bottom of a magnetic source, small-scale variations of theses depths make it difficult for them. This is especially true when using the spectral methods as the maximum depth of a magnetic source is a dependent on the size of the analyzed region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref9">9</xref>]. The 2D power spectrum technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref37">37</xref>] was used to estimate the maximum</p><p>depth of magnetic sources.</p><p>Following the steps done by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref36">36</xref>], the depth (Z<sub>b</sub>) of the magnetic susceptibility source can be estimated using:</p><p>z b = 2 z c − z t . (1)</p><p>where z<sub>t</sub> and z<sub>c</sub> are, respectively, the depth to the top and the depth to the centroid of the magnetized source. This depth can be related to the bottom of magnetically susceptible minerals or the CPD.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Heat Flow Estimates from CPD</title><p>One of the by-products of determining CPDs is that one can estimate temperature gradients and thus the heat flow over a region. This is probably the only geophysical method to determine the regional heat flow when there are no actual heat flow estimates from deep drill holes. The estimates of heat ﬂow from the CPD analyses depend on the temperature used for Curie point and for the most geological environment, magnetite with a Curie temperature which is variable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref38">38</xref>]. The 1D conductive heat ﬂow equation using a constant gradient temperature was used to determine the heat flow. However, using this equation will only provide a ﬁrst-order estimation of the heat ﬂow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref12">12</xref>] but in regions without drill hole determined heat flows, using the CPD is the best option. Fourier’s law which describes 1D conductive heat movement can be expressed as:</p><p>Q = k ∗ ( d T d z ) (2)</p><p>where Q is the heat flow and k is the coefficient of thermal conductivity.</p><p>Equation (2) assumes that the temperature gradient (dT/dz) is constant. The geothermal gradient the CPD (Z<sub>b</sub>) and the surface can be defined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref39">39</xref>] by:</p><p>T C = z b ∗ ( d T d z ) (3)</p><p>where T<sub>c</sub> is the Curie temperature.</p><p>The next step is determining how the geothermal gradient is related to the heat flow (Q) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref40">40</xref>]:</p><p>Q = k ∗ ( T C z b ) (4)</p><p>The Curie temperature is dependent on the magnetic mineralogy of the subsurface lithologies. The accepted value of the Curie temperature of magnetite is approximately 580˚C, however, an increase of Ti within titanomagnetite causes the Curie temperature to be lowered [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref41">41</xref>]. Based on the increase of pressure with depth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref42">42</xref>], it was suggested that magnetite might have a Curie temperature of about 600˚C. However, the average Curie temperature may be as low as 450˚C based on comparing Curie depths determined from magnetic data and the associated calculated temperature gradients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref43">43</xref>]. The above temperature variations for the Curie point for magnetite suggest that an estimate of the heat flow will be variable from the analysis of CPDs. However, using 580˚C in regions with scattered heat flow estimates from drill holes have shown that this temperature can provide reasonable regional heat flow estimates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref12">12</xref>]. In addition to estimating a Curie temperature, the thermal conductivities (k) of the lithologies must be estimated to determine the heat flow. Within the northwest of Cameroon, the most common lithologies are metamorphic schists and gneisses, and granites with have thermal conductivities between 1.3 - 2.9 and 2.4 - 3.8 W∙m<sup>−1</sup>∙K<sup>−1</sup>, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref40">40</xref>].</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Total Magnetic Anomaly Intensity Reduced to the Equator (RTE)</title><p>The RTE magnetic map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) has anomaly values ranging from approximately −77 to 300 nT. These values are in general reflected by variations in the lateral variations in the amount of magnetite within the crustal rocks. Within northwestern Cameroon, these anomalies can be usually correlated with the Proterozoic granitic and metamorphic lithologies including metavolcanics, metaigneous rocks, gneisses and schists (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). The RTE map contains mainly northeast trending minima and maxima anomalies that are roughly parallel to the strike-slip tectonic episodes that related to the Proterozoic collisional events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref26">26</xref>]. The most prominent anomalies are a series of large wavelength, low amplitude magnetic maxima (anomalies 1 and 2) and slightly higher amplitude magnetic minima (anomalies 3 and 4) in the northern portion of the map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The magnetic maxima are caused by lithologies with lower magnetic susceptibility content. The area of anomalies 1 and 2 occur over the medium to high grade gneisses of the NW Cameroon terrane and post Pan African sediments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The extent of this large amplitude magnetic maxima implies that the magnetic susceptibility of the gneisses is relatively low with some regions (small wavelength maxima within the region of anomaly 1) containing higher susceptibilities. This could be due to higher grade gneisses or isolated bodies of mafic metaigneous rocks.</p><p>The upward continued RTE map shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) exhibits a similar pattern of high and low magnetic anomalies that are seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The upward continued RTE map is characterized by anomalies values ranging from about −164.47 to 288.31 nT. The upward continued RTE map is basically a smoothed version of the RTE map and contains prominent negative (long wavelength) anomalies distributed at the northeastern, central and southern parts of our study area. The persistence of the prominent anomalies with large wavelength, low amplitude magnetic maxima (anomalies 1 and 2) and slightly higher amplitude magnetic minima (anomalies 3 and 4) observed in the northern portion of the map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) which indicates that they are associated to deeper structures. In addition, the upward continued RTE map shows attenuated anomalies (anomalies 5, 8, 9 and 10) that are still related to upper crustal lithologies. However, all these anomalies are also present on the RTE map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Curie Point Depth and Heat Flow</title><p>The CPD’s and depths to the bottom magnetic sources were determined using the methods of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>] where a 2D radial power spectra analysis of the upward continued RTE data was used (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) utilizing a 50% overlapping of 30 &#215; 30 km square blocks, as is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b). The study area was subdivided into twenty-one blocks. It is well known that the using of a small window width may produce an error in using the spectral methods in aeromagnetic interpretation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref44">44</xref>]. Furthermore, it was showed that [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref12">12</xref>] window size is dependent on the depth to the bottom of a magnetic susceptibility source and that the window size should be two to three times the depths to be determined. Accordingly, the radial power spectra for different window widths were calculated, it is ranging from 10 to 55 km with a 5 km increase in window width and found that a 30 &#215; 30 km window best delineated depths between 6 and 13 km. The 2D radial power spectrum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)) of the upward continued RTE data for each window was then computed. Next, the long wavelengths of regional magnetic anomalies were removed using a first-order polynomial trend surface for each block, and the grids were expanded by 10% to lessen the edge effects of using the Fourier Transform in determining the power spectrum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref45">45</xref>].</p><p>Following [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref37">37</xref>] and references therein, for each block, the depth to bottom of magnetic source in the present study is estimated in four main steps using [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>] method:</p><p>1) compute the radially averaged power spectrum of the magnetic data;</p><p>2) firstly, pick two points to determine the slope on first spectrum (black line) in order to estimate the depth to the top of the magnetic source (Z<sub>t</sub>);</p><p>3) afterwards pick two points to determine the slope on the frequency-scaled spectrum (red line) to estimate the depth to the centroid of the magnetic source (Z<sub>c</sub>);</p><p>4) thus, deduce the depth to the bottom of the magnetic source (Z<sub>b</sub>) using relation (1).</p><p>The results of the power spectrum analysis are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, on which the heat flow and geothermal gradient were deduced using relation (2) and (4). The estimated depths to the centroid range from 4.06 km for block 13 to 9.74 km for block 9. However, the depths to the top of magnetic susceptibility sources ranged from 1.74 to 5.73 km. Hence, the depths to the bottom of the magnetic susceptibility sources range (which was interpreted to be the CPD) from a minimum depth of 6.36 km, to a maximum depth of 13.72 km. The spectrally determined depths reflect the average depths beneath each block [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref46">46</xref>]. The ranges of the estimated depths to the top boundary of the magnetic sources are well correlated with the other regional work in and surrounding the study area</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Estimated CPD, geothermal gradients and heat flow for the 21 blocks in the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Block number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Coordinates (UTM)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Depth to Top (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Depth to Centroid (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >CPD (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Geothermal Gradient (˚C/km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Heat Flow (mW/m<sup>2</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Easting (km)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Northing (km)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429.771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1145.118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.607</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1145.118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1145.118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1145.118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429.653</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1130.072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1130.307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1130.307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1130.307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384.516</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1115.496</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1115.496</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349.722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1092.692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >364.768</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1092.692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >379.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1092.692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429.418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120.433</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120.198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384.751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1092.692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389.923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1095.278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >394.625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1100.685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >379.814</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1145.588</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >379.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1130.542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >bloc21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >379.814</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1115.731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref47">47</xref>]. From seismic refraction studies, the maximum depth to the basement in the central sector of the WCARS is around 7 km [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>Previous CPD studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref12">12</xref>] have shown that the CPD is related to the geological makeup of an area. The shallowest depth to the bottom of the magnetic susceptibility sources (CPD), ranging between 6.37 and 10.01 km, is obtained within the blocks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19 and 21. These blocks are located in different regions of the study area including the northern portion (Hina Marbak, Gawel and north of Moutouroua), the southeastern portion (Kaele), southern portion (Guider) and southwestern portion (Mayo Oulo). The majority of these areas (e.g., Hina Marbak, Gawel and north of Moutouroua) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) are located where Lower Cretaceous sediments outcrop. Numerous lineaments and shear zones are located in this region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref15">15</xref>]. These shallow depths may be due to magmatic intrusions which could be related to the CVL, and the other shallow depths are likely due to the rifting related to the Benue Trough [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref48">48</xref>]. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref47">47</xref>] showed that this region is mainly related to the CVL, although this region has been affected by a failed arm of the Benue Trough. The thermal effect of the igneous activity on the Cretaceous sedimentary basins and the basement complex, led to local thermal anomalies observed in the region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref49">49</xref>]. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref4">4</xref>] using Japan as an example showed that CPDs less than 10 km occur in volcanic and geothermal areas, between 15 - 25 km in island arcs, and deeper than 20 km in oceanic plateaus, while [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref12">12</xref>] showed that in Precambrian terrains these depths are greater than 15 km.</p><p>From our analysis, four shallows (depths less than 10.38 km) CPD regions: SCPD1, SCPD2, SCPD3 and SCPD4 can be identified. These regions might be related to elevated heat flow in the study area. SCPD1 is in the northwestern part of the study area and is located near the Hina-Gawel area where it trends in a northwest direction. SCPD2 is located in the eastern part of the study area and is located in the Kaele area, approximately trending north-south. SCPD3 is located in the southern portion of the study area near the Guider neighbourhoods where it trends approximately north-south. SCPD4 is located in the Mayo Oulo area and also approximately trends north-south. However, the shallower regions of SCPD1 and SCPD2 could also be considered as a separate shallow CPD regions as this region is split into two parts by a broad northeast trending of deeper CPD region centered at longitude 14˚10'. This slightly deeper trend occurs over the mafic to intermediate metaigneous lithologies of the Mayo-Kebbi domain and the metavolcano-sedimentary units of the Poli-Lere Group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). This region also is the site of numerous thrust faults related to the collision tectonics of the Pan African belt and thus may be a region of thicker crust with lower heat flow values and may have been harder to rift during the formation of the Central African Rift system. The other shallow CPD regions are found in the SCPD3 and SCPD4 regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). These regions are adjacent to the inferred trend of the CVL and the elevated CPD may be related to magmatic activity within the CVL.</p><p>The deeper depths to the bottom of magnetic sources, ranging between 10.38 and 13.72 km, is found in the northeast portion of the study area (DCPD4, Mindif region) and in the southwest (DCPD3, Moutouroua, Guider, Bossoum). DCPD4 is within the Cretaceous sediments related to the Benue Trough but lies along trend to the deeper values mentioned above related to the thrust zone with the Mayo-Kebbi domain. DCPD3 is in a region of syntectonic granites and medium to high grades gneisses of the NW-Cameroon domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Additionally, two other deeper regions (DCPD1 and DCPD2) are seen on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. This northwest trending zone occurs mainly over the Neoproterozoic gneisses of the NW-Cameroon zone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) suggesting that the shallow regions to the northeast and southwest are related to small isolated geothermal anomalies. Recently, the studies done by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref50">50</xref>] in Mindif-Kaele area revealed potential geothermal reservoirs at Djangal and Moundjou, located in northeastern portion of the study area (SCPD1, Mindif neighbourhood), which is corroborated by the CPD regions.</p><p>The shallow CPDs in regions SCPD4 and SCPD3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) can be associated with regions that have been extended in the Mesozoic during the formation of the WCARS which formed the Benue Trough. Regions SCPD1 and SCPD2 are not so readily interpretable as these regions occur over Quaternary sediments and Proterozoic units (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Seismic S-wave tomographic images locate these regions over low velocity zones indicating that these shallow regions may be related to magma in the subsurface. However, the S-wave tomographic images were constructed by 25 broadband stations covering the entire country of Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref25">25</xref>] and do not have the resolution to image small-scale differences in the S-wave velocity structure. The S-wave tomographic results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref25">25</xref>] indicate that the main zone of the CVL is underlain by deep low velocity zones, but in northern Cameroon the low velocity zones are of a smaller magnitude and cover isolated areas. The most prominent low velocity region, which occurs over the Cretaceous sediments, is correlated to shallow CPD regions SCPD3 and SCPD4. Additionally, the P-wave velocity images, which are less sensitive to partially melted material, indicate similar but more subtle trends than the S-wave results. The P-wave images also indicate small amplitude low velocity regions under our shallow CDP regions SCPD1 and SCPD2. This lack of correlation may be due to other factors other than thermal variations such as the wide spacing of the broadband stations, or that the northern low P-wave velocity zones are more indicative lithological variations at depth than the S-wave results. In fact, the shallow CDP regions seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> may represent regions of potentially higher magmatic and/or geothermal activity that cannot be imaged by widely spaced broadband seismic experiments. To determine that cause of our shallow depths, more detailed crustal scale seismic studies in the form of seismic refraction or closely spaced broadband stations, and/or magnetotelluric studies are needed to confirm if these regions are indeed related to geothermal activity. In contrast, the deeper CPD regions (DCPD1-4) may be related to thicker crust [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref51">51</xref>] or are regions with less Quaternary magmatic activity. The CPD depths occur in general trends which are consistent with the prevailing tectonic environment, where a series of NNW to NW-trending extensional basins occur, caused by the strain of NE to ENE trending strike-slip faults coming from the Gulf of Guinea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>The determination of the surface heat flow requires a CPD and a thermal conductivity of the most common lithologies in the region. For the thermal conductivity, 2.5 W∙m<sup>−1</sup>∙˚C<sup>−1</sup> was used based on the average thermal conductivity values for Proterozoic lithologies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref52">52</xref>]. Using the CPDs from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and a Curie isothermal point of 580˚C, a geothermal gradient was calculated. The heat flow values were then determined by multiplying the geothermal gradient by the thermal conductivity using equation 8. The lowest heat flow value (105.68 mW/m<sup>2</sup>) was obtained for block 9 and the highest heat flow value (227.63 mW/m<sup>2</sup>) was obtained for block 4 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The heat flow values are all greater than 100 mW/m<sup>2</sup> and worldwide heat flow values average between 80 - 100 mW/m<sup>2</sup>. Thus, our heat flow values indicate that northern Cameroon has geothermal anomalous conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref53">53</xref>]. In particular, the regions with heat flow values greater than 180 mW/m<sup>2</sup> are indicative of regions with geothermal potential. The region with the greatest geothermal potential is found in the northern portions of the study area, particularly in the neighbourhood of Hina Marbak where the heat flow value was the highest. The study area exhibits two main potential geothermal areas which are characterized by low and high heat flow. The high heat flow values are concentrated around the Hina-Gawel, Kaele, Guider and Mayo Oulo areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The results also show that shallow depths and the attendant high heat flow values may be related to the effects of large-scale tectonic events. In northern Cameroon, the most likely magma rising event is the formation of the volcanic material in the CVL that has risen along the northeast-trending strike-slip faults. The known volcanoes occur just to the south of the study area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref24">24</xref>] but a recent broadband seismic study indicates that potentially partially melted material may exist in isolated areas in northern Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref31">31</xref>]. Heat flow studies in other regions have shown that the heat flow in sedimentary basins the amplitude of the temperature effect is larger for thermal events within the basin (intrusions or diapirism) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref54">54</xref>] and in Proterozoic metamorphic and igneous terranes where the lithologies have an average higher thermal conductivities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref55">55</xref>]. This same reasoning applies that high heat flow found in northern Cameroon may be indicative of wide scale thermal events. Potential regions for geothermal exploration are regions characterized by high heat flow, high temperature gradient, and therefore shallow depths to the bottom of magnetic susceptibility sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99387-ref56">56</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b) show the variations of the geothermal gradient and heat flow with the calculated CPDs, respectively. The geothermal gradient and heat flow decrease significantly with the deeper depths to the CPD. The results obtained also indicate that the geothermal gradients in this study area vary between 42.27 and 91.05˚C/km; with an atypical maximum of 91.05˚C/km stands out in the in the neighbourhood of Hina Marbak.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Aeromagnetic data from northern Cameroon were investigated in order to determine the Curie point depth (CPD) and to aid in assessing the geothermal potential of the region. The CPDS were estimated using a 2D radially averaged power spectral method using 30 &#215; 30 km blocks of upward continued aeromagnetic data. The estimated CPDs indicate that depths vary from 6.37 to 13.72 km. The results suggest that there are four regions of shallow CPDs with two regions in northern part of the study area and one in the southeast and one in the southwest portions of the study area. The southern shallow CPD regions correspond to a region of Cretaceous sediment formed by West-Central African Rift System and are along the northern extent of the still active Cameroon Volcanic Line which occurs above low S-wave velocity regions imaged by broadband</p><p>seismic studies. The northern shallow CPD zones occur over Proterozoic metamorphic and igneous lithologies but also occur above low P-wave velocity regions. Using the CPD and average thermal conductivity values, heat flow values ranged from 227.63 to 105.68 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, which are considered above average global heat flow values. The regional trends observed in CPDs are thought to be related to magmatic activity associated with the Cameroon Volcanic Line and possibly to the strain being released by the northeast-trending strike-slip motions associated with the Benue Trough. Overall, the most important information’s provided from this study, is existence of potential geothermal energy resources in terms as subsurface hot spots or geothermal reservoir, which could be a powerful source of renewable energy. On other hand, the estimation of the CPD values could be useful tool to explain hydrothermal activity or geodynamic processes in the study area, delineate zones with a favourable geothermal system. More details of geophysical investigations should determine further the geothermal potential of these high flow areas. These supplementary data may allow to accurately predict the economic strategies for exploitation of this potential geothermal energy resource in aiming to support the Gov’t energy policies in the area.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ngoh, J.D., Mbarga, T.N., Mickus, K., Tarek, Y. and Tabod, T.C. (2020) Estimation of Curie Point Depth (CPD) across the Pan African Belt in Northern Cameroon from Aeromagnetic Data. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 9, 217-239. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.93013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.99387-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Chapman, D. and Furlong, K. (1992) The Thermal State of the Lower Crust, In: Fountain, D., Arculus, R. and Kay, R., Eds., Continental Lower Crust, Developments in Geotectonics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 179-199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nyblade, A. and Pollack, H. (1993) A Global Analysis of Heat Flow from Precambrian Terranes: Implications for the Thermal Structure of Archean and Proterozoic Lithosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 12207-12218.https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB00521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Artemieva, I. and Mooney, W. (2001) Thermal Thickness and Evolution of Precambrian Lithosphere: A Global Study. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 16387-16414. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900439</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanaka, A., Okubo, Y. and Matsubayashi, O. (1999) Curie Point Depth Based on Spectrum Analysis of the Magnetic Anomaly Data in East and Southeast Asia. Tectonophysics, 306, 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00072-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aboud, E., Salem, A. and Mekkawi, M. (2011) Curie Depth Map for Sinai Peninsula, Egypt Deduced from the Analysis of Magnetic Data. Tectonophysics, 506, 46-54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.04.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharyya, B.K. and Leu, L.-K. (1975) Spectral Analysis of Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies Due to Two-Dimensional Structures. Geophysics, 40, 993-1013.https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440593</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spector, A. and Grant., F.S. (1970) Statistical Models for Interpreting Aeromagnetic Data. Geophysics, 35, 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440092</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okubo, Y., Graf, J.R., Hansen, R.O., Ogawa, K. and Tsu, H. (1985) Curie Point Depths of the Island of Kyushu and Surrounding Areas, Japan. Geophysics, 53, 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441926</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouligand, C., Glen, J.M.G. and Blakely, R.J. (2009) Mapping Curie Temperature Depth in the Western United States with a Fractal Model for Crustal Magnetization. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006494</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mickus, K. (1989) Backus and Gilbert Inversion of Two and One-Half Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies and Crustal Structure Studies in Western Arizona and Southeastern California. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussein, M., Mickus, K. and Serpa, L. (2012) Curie Point Depth Estimates from Aeromagnetic Data from Death Valley and Surrounding Regions, California. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170, 617-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0557-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mickus, K. and Hussein, M. (2015) Curie Depth Analysis of the Salton Sea Region, Southern California Pure and Applied Geophysics, 172, 1383-1780.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ravat, D., Pignatelli, A., Nicolosi, I. and Chiappini, M. (2007) A Study of Spectral Methods of Estimating the Depth to the Bottom of Magnetic Sources from Near-Surface Magnetic Anomaly Data. Geophysical Journal International, 169, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03305.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toteu, S.F., Penaye, J. and Djomani, Y.P. (2004) Geodynamic Evolution of the Pan-African Belt in Central Africa with Special Reference to Cameroon. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 41, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1139/e03-079</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngoh, J.D., Ndougsa Mbarga, T., Assembe, S.P., Meying, A., Owono Amougou, O.U.I. and Tabod, C.T. (2017) Evidence of Structural Facts Inferred from Aeromagnetic Data Analysis over the Guider-Maroua Area (Northern Cameroon). International Journal of Geosciences, 8, 781-800. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.86044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pauken, R., Thompson, J., Schumann, J. and Cooke, J. (1991) Geology of the Douala Basin, Offshore Cameroon, West Africa. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 75, CONF-910403. https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B0AA3-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biyiha-Kelaba, W., Ndougsa-Mbarga, T., Yene-Atangana, P. and Tabod, T. (2013) 2.5 D Models Derived from the Magnetic Anomalies Obtained by Upwards Continuation in the Mimbi Area, Southern Cameroon. Journal of Earth Science and Geotechnical Engineering, 4, 171-199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Genik, G.J. (1992) Regional Framework, Structural and Petroleum Aspects of Rift Basins in Niger, Chad and the Central African Republic (C.A.R.). Tectonophysics, 213, 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90257-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tadjou, J., Nouayou, R., Kamguia, J., Houetchack, L. and Manguelle-Dicoum, E. (2009) Gravity Analysis of the Boundary between the Congo Craton and the Pan-African Belt of Cameroon. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 102, 71-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elsheikh, A., Gao, S. and Liu, K. (2014) Formation of the Cameroon Volcanic Line by Lithospheric Basal Erosion: Insight from Mantle Seismic Anisotropy. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 100, 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Plaen, R., Bastow, I., Chambers, E., Keir, D., Gallacher, R. and Keane, J. (2014) The Development of Magmatism along the Cameroon Volcanic Line: Evidence from Seismicity and Seismic Anisotropy. Journal of Geophysical Research, 119, 4233-4252. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010583</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fairhead, J.D. (1988) Mesozoic Plate Tectonic Reconstructions of the Central South Atlantic Ocean: The Role of the West and Central African Rift System. Tectonophysics, 155, 188-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(88)90265-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guiraud, R., Bosworth, W., Thierry, J. and Delplanque, A. (2005) Phanerozoic Geological Evolution of Northern and Central Africa: An Overview. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 43, 83-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marzoli, A., Piccirillo, E., Renne, P., Bellieni, G., Iacumin, M., Nyobe, J. and Tongwa, A. (2000) The Cameroon Volcanic Line Revisted: Petrogenesis of Continental Basaltic Magmas from Lithospheric and Asthenospheric Mantle Sources. Journal of Petrology, 41, 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/41.1.87</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reusch, A., Nyblade, A., Wiens, D., Shore, P., Ateba, B., Tabod, C. and Nnange, J. (2010) Upper Mantle Structure Beneath Cameroon from Body Wave Tomography and the Origin of the Cameroon Volcanic Line. Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geosystems, 11, W1007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngako, V., Affaton, P. and Njonfang, E. (2008) Pan-African Tectonics in Northwestern Cameroon Implication for the History of Western Gondwana. Gondwana Research, 14, 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liégeois, J.P., Black, R., Navez, J. and Latouche, L. (1994) Early and Late Pan-African Orogenies in the Air Assembly of Terranes (Tuareg Shield, Niger). Precambrian Research, 67, 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(94)90005-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdelsalam, M.G., Liégeois, J.-P. and Stern, R.J. (2002) The Saharan Metacraton. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 34, 119-136.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(02)00013-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toteu, S.F., Penaye, J., Deloule, E., Van Schmus, W.R. and Tchameni, R. (2006) Diachronous Evolution of Volcano-Sedimentary Basins North of the Congo Craton: Insights from U-Pb Ion Microprobe Dating of Zircons from the Poli, Lom and Yaoundé Groups (Cameroon). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 428-442.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Penaye, J., Kr&amp;#246ner, A., Toteu, S.F., Van Schmus, W.R. and Doumnang, J.C. (2006) Evolution of the Mayo Kebbi Region as Revealed by Zircon Dating: An Early (CA. 740 Ma) Pan-African Magmatic Arc in Southwestern Chad. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Schmus, W.R., Oliveira, E.P., Da Silva Filho, A.F., Toteu, S.F., Penaye, J. and Guimar&amp;#227es, I.P. (2008) Proterozoic Links between the Borborema Province, NE Brazil, and the Central African Fold Belt. Geological Society (London), 294, 69-99.https://doi.org/10.1144/SP294.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ngako, V. and Njonfang, E. (2011) Plates Amalgamation and Plate Destruction, the Western Gondwana History. In: Closson, D., Ed., Tectonics, InTech, UK, 3-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mo&amp;#239se, B., Hell, J.V., Samankassou, E., Feist-Burkhardt, S., Eyong, J.T., Ngos, S., Nolla, J.D., Mbesse, C.O., Adatte, T., Mfoumbeng, M.P., Dissombo, E.A.N., Ntsama, A.J., Mouloud, B. and Ndjeng, E. (2018) Hydrocarbon Potential, Palynology and Palynofacies of Four Sedimentary Basins in the Benue Trough, Northern Cameroon. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 139, 73-95.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.11.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngako, V., Njonfang, E., Aka, F., Affaton, P. and Nnange, J. (2006) The North-South Paleozoic to Quaternary Trend of Alkaline Magmatism from Niger-Nigeria to Cameroon: Complex Interaction between Hotspots and Precambrian Faults. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 45, 241-256.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2006.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shuey, R.T., Schellinger, D.K., Tripp, A.C. and Alley, L.B. (1977) Curie Depth Determination from Aeromagnetic Spectra. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 50, 75-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1977.tb01325.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Helaly, S.A. (2019) Imaging the Curie Point Isothermal Surface and Predicting Its Impact on the Geothermal Regime within the Nile Delta, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 28, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.11.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mono, J.A., Ndougsa-Mbarga, T., Tarek, Y., Ngoh, J.D. and Owono Amougou, O.U.I. (2018) Estimation of Curie-Point Depths, Geothermal Gradients and Near-Surface Heat Flow from Spectral Analysis of Aeromagnetic Data in the Loum-Minta Area (Centre-East Cameroon). Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 27, 1291-1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haggerty, S.E. (1978) Mineralogical Constraints on Curie Isotherms in Deep Crustal Magnetic Anomalies. Geophysical Research Letters, 5, 105-108.https://doi.org/10.1029/GL005i002p00105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maden, N. (2010) Curie-Point Depth from Spectral Analysis of Magnetic Data in Erciyes Stratovolcano (Central Turkey). Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167, 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0017-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turcotte, D.L. and Schubert, G. (1982) Geodynamics Applications of Continuum Physics to Geologic Problems. Wiley, New York, 450 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stacey, F.D. and Banerjee, S.K. (1974) The Physical Principles of Rock Magnetism. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 195 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frost, B.R. and Shive, P.N. (1986) Magnetic Mineralogy of the Lower Continental Crust. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91, 6513-6521.https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB06p06513</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okubo, Y., Tsu, H. and Ogawa, K. (1989) Estimation of Curie Point Temperature and Geothermal Structure of Island Arcs of Japan. Tectonophysics, 159, 279-290.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(89)90134-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwankwo, L. and Shehu, A. (2015) Evaluation of Curie-Point Depths, Geothermal Gradients and Near-Surface Heat Flow from High-Resolution Aeromagnetic (HRAM) Data of the Entire Sokoto Basin, Nigeria. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 305, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.09.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khojamli, A., Ardejani, F., Moradzadeh, A., Kalate, A., Kahoo, A. and Porkhial, S. (2016) Estimation of Curie Point Depths and Heat Flow from Ardebil Province, Iran, Using Aeromagnetic Data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9, 383-393.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2400-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kasidi, S. and Nur, A. (2012) Curie Depth Isotherm Deduced from Spectral Analysis of Magnetic Data over Sarti and Environs of North-Eastern Nigeria. School Journal of Biotechnology, 1, 49-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eyike, A., Werner, S.C., Ebbing, J. and Dicoum, E.M. (2010) On the Use of Global Potential Field Models for Regional Interpretation of the West and Central African Rift System. Tectonophysics, 492, 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.04.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rankenburg, K., Lassiter, J.C. and Brey, G. (2004) Origin of Megacrysts in Volcanic Rocks of the Cameroon Volcanic Chain—Constraints on Magma Genesis and Crustal Contamination. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 147, 129-144.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-003-0534-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kurowska, E. and Schoeneich, K. (2010) Geothermal Exploration in Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Bali, Indonesia, 25-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Domra, K.J., Djongyang, N., Danwé, R., Njandjock, N.P., Robert, N., Tabod, C.T. and Oumarou, S. (2015) Geophysical Investigation of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Potential and Ground Water Reservoirs in the Sudano-Sahelian Region of Cameroon. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 81-91.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saibi, H., Aboud, E. and Masoud, A. (2015) Curie Point Depth Map for Western Afghanistan Deduced from the Analysis of Aeromagnetic Data. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stacey, F.D. (1977) Physics of the Earth. 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 414 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jessop, A., Hobart, M. and Sclater, J. (1976) The World Heat Flow Data Collection 1975, Geothermal Services of Canada. Geothermal Service, 50, 55-77.https://doi.org/10.4095/8416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blackwell, D.D. (1971) The Thermal Structure of the Continental Crust. The Structure and Physical Properties of the Earth’s Crust, Geophysical Monograph Series, 14, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM014p0169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cermak, V. and Rybach, L. (1982) Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat of Minerals and Rocks. Springer-Verlag Publishing, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99387-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bansal, A.R., Gabriel, G., Dimri, V.P. and Krawczyk, C.M. (2011) Estimation of Depth to the Bottom of Magnetic Sources by a Modified Centroid Method for Fractal Distribution of Sources: An Application to Aeromagnetic Data in Germany. Geophysics, 76, L11-L22. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3560017</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>