<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2020.113027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-99049</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Interactive Effect of Variety and Irradiation Dose on Postharvest Behaviour of Fruits of Two Plantain (&lt;i&gt;Musa&lt;/i&gt; sp AAB) Varieties from the Green Stage to the Onset of Ripening
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daniel</surname><given-names>Osei Ofosu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Francis</surname><given-names>Appiah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bernard</surname><given-names>Banful</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Horticulture, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>372</fpage><lpage>381</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2020</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Controlling ethylene production and respiratory rate of climacteric fruits is reported to extend the shelf-life of those produce. The aim of this present research was to determine the effect of five (5) doses of gamma irradiation as an ethylene and respiration inhibitor on two (2) distinct varieties of plantain (
  Musa
   sp AAB) up to the onset of ripening. The variety and irradiation dose applied had a significant interaction on the number of days to the onset of fruit ripening. The daily mean ethylene production for both varieties was lowest at 200 Gy. Even though Apantu had a lower daily average as compared to Apem, it reached the onset of ripening relatively quicker than Apem. Irradiation caused a significant decrease in the respiratory rate of the plantains. Irrespective of the dose applied, the unirradiated usually had a significantly higher respiratory rate and the accompanying carbon dioxide production. Plantain varieties irradiated at 1000 Gy had the highest amount of total soluble solids contents (10.7&#176;Brix) significantly higher than the other stages of ripening yet similar to the plantain varieties irradiated at 600 Gy (10.6&#176;Brix), 800 Gy (10.6&#176;Brix) and the unirradiated (0 Gy) plantain varieties (10.3&#176;Brix). The lower levels of soluble solids may confer a better cooking quality as plantains would be less sweet and also less prone to textural breakdown when cooked.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Plantain</kwd><kwd> Gamma Irradiation</kwd><kwd> Ethylene</kwd><kwd> Respiratory Rate</kwd><kwd> Ripening</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The basic distinguishing feature between climacteric fruits and non-climacteric fruits is the increased ethylene synthesis and respiration rate during ripening of climacteric fruits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref1">1</xref>]. Several aspects of the role ethylene plays in the ripening of climacteric fruits have been widely studied and well established [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>The response of matured fruits to ethylene is known to vary widely and is very much dependent on crop species, exposure dosages, as well as environmental conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref6">6</xref>]. This directly means that the process of ripening varies in different fruits as far as the involvement of ethylene is concerned [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref3">3</xref>]. Since ethylene often promotes its own production in plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref7">7</xref>], controlling its levels is crucial in maintaining crop quality.</p><p>There are contrasting reports on the role respiration plays in the onset of ripening of climacteric fruits. While [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref8">8</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref9">9</xref>] found no increase in the respiration rate during the ripening of tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Castelmart) and muskmelon respectively, it is widely held that ethylene-associated respiration peak is present at the onset of ripening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>The control of fruit ripening and storage ability can be achieved through a reduction of ethylene production and respiration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref13">13</xref>]. The differences in the reactions of different fruit species, and sometimes cultivars, to ethylene call for more investigation into the different ways in ethylene inhibition can affect the maturation, ripening, and storage of different cultivars of fruits. This present research sought to determine the effect of gamma irradiation as an ethylene and respiration inhibitor on two distinct varieties of plantain (Musa sp AAB) up to the onset of ripening.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plantain Varieties</title><p>Two varieties Apantu (Falsehorn plantain) and Apem (French type) were used for the study. The fruits were allowed to fill up to the commercial level preferred by farmers. Mature green (13 weeks after flowering) unripe plantains (Musa sp AAB) were obtained directly from the farmers on the same day of harvest at Adawso in the Eastern Region of Ghana (Map 1). Samples were taken from the first six rows of the proximal and midsection of the bunch.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Irradiation</title><p>Irradiation of samples was carried using a Cobalt-60 source under ambient conditions at the Gamma Irradiation Facility (GIF) of the Radiation Technology Centre (RTC) in the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) at irradiation doses of 200 Gy, 400 Gy, 600 Gy, 800 Gy and 1000 Gy before storage. A control experiment was carried out where the fruits were not irradiated (designated as 0 Gy). The dose rate was 1.962 kGy/hr and ferrous sulphate (Fricke) dosimeter was used to measure absorbed dose.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Determination of Peel and Pulp Colours Up to the Onset of Ripening</title><p>A visual method (based on a modification of banana ripening chart developed</p><disp-formula id="scirp.99049-formula7"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-2604524x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Map 1. Eastern region of Ghana.</p><p>by the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref14">14</xref>]) was used to determine the peel colour. The scale was modified to end at the onset of ripening at ripening stage 4 or physiological stage 2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Determination of Amount of Ethylene Produced</title><p>Ethylene production from the green mature stage (stage 1) to the onset of ripening (stage 4) was measured on a daily basis by enclosing whole fruit samples in an airtight container for one (1) hour at 25˚C, withdrawing 1 mL of the headspace gas, and injecting it into a gas chromatograph fitted with a pulse discharge helium ionization detector (PDHID, ethylene). The parameters of the gas chromatograph were: injector temperature 120˚C; detector temperature 200˚C; oven temperature 75˚C; sensitivity 4 &#215; 10; carrier gas, Helium; flow rate through the column was 0.33 mL∙s<sup>−1</sup>. Quantification of the amount of ethylene produced was according to the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref7">7</xref>], in which 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) was quantitatively converted to ethylene and a standard curve for ethylene generated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Estimation of Amount of Carbon Dioxide Produced</title><p>The respiratory rate (as carbon dioxide produced) from the green mature stage (stage 1) to the onset of ripening (stage 4) was measured using the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref15">15</xref>] on a daily basis by enclosing whole fruit samples in an airtight container for one (1) hour at 25˚C, withdrawing 1 mL of the headspace gas, and injecting it into a gas chromatograph fitted with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD, CO<sub>2</sub>) and an activated alumina column. The parameters of the gas chromatograph were: injector temperature 120˚C; detector temperature 200˚C; oven temperature 75˚C; sensitivity 4 &#215; 10; carrier gas, Helium; flow rate through the column was 0.33 mL∙s<sup>−1</sup>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Peel colour changes of plantain at various stages of ripening</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Physiological phases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ripening stage (colour score)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Description of peel colour</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pre-climacteric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pale green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Climacteric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pale green with yellow tips</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50% yellow 50% green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More yellow than green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >All yellow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Senescence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow flecked with brown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50% black 50% yellow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More black than yellow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pure black</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Determination of Starch Content Up to the Onset of Ripening</title><p>The method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref16">16</xref>] was used. The samples were defatted with diethylether and the soluble sugars were removed with 80% ethanol at 80˚C. After centrifugation, the starch was hydrolyzed with 0.25 mol/L sulfuric acid at 100˚C for one (1) hour. The hydrolysate was mixed with 76% anthrone-sulfuric solution, heated for 10 min and cooled. A blank was prepared with distilled water instead of the sample extract. The absorbance was determined at 620 nm in a Shimadzu UV–vis 160 A spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). The concentration of glucose was calculated from standard curves (r2 ≥ 0.9937) and the levels of starch (g/100 g) were calculated using a conversion factor of 0.9.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Determination of Reducing Sugar Content Up to the Onset of Ripening</title><p>The reducing sugar content in the irradiated and unirradiated plantain pulp during the storage was determined using the Lane-Eynon method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref17">17</xref>]. Ten (10) grams of the pulp was homogenized with 100 ml of distilled water in a Waring Blender (Model 35BL59, USA) for 15 seconds. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for five (5) minutes. Twenty-five (25) ml of mixed Fehling’s solution was pipetted into 250 ml volumetric flask. The flask was swirled while heating over a Bunsen flame. The mixed Fehling’s solution was boiled moderately for 1.5 to 2 minutes and two (2) drops of methylene blue solution was quickly added. Immediately, the homogenate solution of the plantain was added via a burette at a rate of about 0.25 ml per 15 seconds. The titration was completed within 3 minutes from the time boiling commenced.</p><p>Percentage of reducing sugars ( calculated as sucrose ) = 100 &#215; A &#215; a P &#215; V</p><p>where A = volume (mL) of solution of prepared sample; P = weight of sample used (g); V = volume (mL) of sample aqueous solution used in titration; a = amount of sucrose equivalent to 20 mL Fehling’s solution</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Determination of Total Soluble Solids (˚Brix) Content Up to the Onset of Ripening</title><p>The method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref18">18</xref>] was used to determine the total soluble solids (TSS) of fruit at the first four stages of ripening. Approximately 30 g of plantain pulp was homogenized in 90 mL of distilled water for 2 min and filtered using Whatman No.1 filter paper. A single drop of the filtrate was placed on the prism of a refractometer with a degree brix range of 0% - 32% and resolutions of 0.2 ˚Brix at 20˚C with distilled water and readings for percentage TSS were expressed in degrees Brix (˚Bx). Recorded values were multiplied by three due to the dilution factor of the pulp, which is three times the amount of distilled water.</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Data Analysis</title><p>The data generated from this research was subjected to analysis of variance using the Statistix 10 statistical software. Means were separated using Tukey’s HSD with the level of significance set at 0.01.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Several researchers have recommended the use of gamma irradiation as one of the ways to extend the shelf life of many agricultural produce. Apart from delaying ripening, gamma irradiation has been reported to eliminate pathogenic bacteria, disinfest fresh fruits and vegetables as a postharvest quarantine treatment, inhibit sprouting of bulbs and tubers, and reduce or eliminate microorganisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>In the present study, there was significant variety x irradiation dose interactions for the number of days to the onset of fruit ripening (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Apem irradiated at 200 Gy and the unirradiated (0 Gy) Apem took the longest time to start ripening (5.7 days), significantly longer than the other treatment combinations but similar to Apantu irradiated at 200 Gy (5.1 days) and Apem irradiated at 600 Gy (4.8 days).</p><p>The time taken for the individual varieties to reach the onset of ripening is directly linked to the amount of ethylene produced after irradiation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The daily mean ethylene production for both varieties was lowest at 200 Gy. Even though Apantu had a lower daily average as compared to Apem, it reached the</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety and irradiation dose on the number of days to onset of fruit ripening</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Number of days to onset of ripening</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Irradiation dose (Gy)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apantu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey HSD (0.01): Variety = 0.25; Irradiation dose = 0.57; Variety &#215; Irradiation dose = 0.90.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety and irradiation dose on ethylene production (&#181;l∙kg<sup>−1</sup>∙hr<sup>−1</sup>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Ethylene Production (&#181;l∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>∙hr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Irradiation dose (Gy)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apantu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >467.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >451.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >444.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >374.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >388.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >336.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >343.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >306.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >347.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey HSD (0.01): Variety = 10.60; Irradiation dose = 23.02; Variety &#215; Irradiation dose = 36.44.</p><p>onset of ripening relatively quicker than Apem. In the present study, the production of ethylene production is not inhibited, even by doses of 1000 Gy. The irradiation does (200 Gy and 400 Gy) appear to cause a momentary inhibition in the volumes of the ethylene released by causing a mutation in the ACC oxidase production, the rate limiting enzyme, resulting in some delay before the fruits reach the onset of ripening. It is apparent that at maturity, ethylene is released by the fruit resulting in the ripening process being initiated before the application of the irradiation. The higher doses (600 Gy, 800 Gy and 1000 Gy) appear to be causing other physicochemical changes in the plantain fruits thereby causing the fruit to respond quicker by producing more ethylene in a relatively short time.</p><p>From the present study, it is obvious that irradiation is causing a significant decrease in the rate of respiration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This is evident from the fact that irrespective of the dose applied, the unirradiated usually had a significantly higher respiratory rate and the accompanying carbon dioxide production. There was however no clear pattern to the effect of the irradiation doses on the carbon dioxide production. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref22">22</xref>] Reported that respiration rates decrease with increasing irradiation doses due to reduced metabolic activities of irradiated samples.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref23">23</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref24">24</xref>] report that the ˚Brix increases in plantain fruits after harvest till the fruit reaches the climacterium. The increase in the total soluble solids content of plantains as it ripens has been attributed to the increased activity of ripening related enzymes like α amylase, β amylase and starch phosphorylase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref26">26</xref>] which cause the starches in the pulp to be broken down to sugars. Plantain varieties irradiated at 1000 Gy had the highest amount of total soluble solids contents (10.7˚Brix) significantly higher than the other stages of ripening yet similar to the plantain varieties irradiated at 600 Gy (10.6˚Brix), 800 Gy (10.6˚Brix) and the unirradiated (0 Gy) plantain varieties. (10.3˚Brix) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The higher doses broke down the complex starches hence their higher soluble solids content. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref27">27</xref>] suggested that lower levels of soluble solids may confer a better cooking quality as plantains would be less sweet and also less prone to textural breakdown when cooked.</p><p>Apantu irradiated at 200 Gy had the highest starch content (81.1 g/100 g), significantly higher than the other treatment combinations yet similar to the unirradiated (0 Gy) Apantu (80.9 g/100 g) and the Apantu irradiated at 400 Gy (80.5 g/100 g). The least starch content was recorded in Apem irradiated at 1000 Gy</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety and irradiation dose on carbon dioxide production (ml CO<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup> hr<sup>−1</sup>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Carbon dioxide production (ml CO<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> hr<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Irradiation dose (Gy)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apantu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >234.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey HSD (0.01): Variety = 3.65; Irradiation dose = 8.36; Variety &#215; Irradiation dose = 13.23.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety and irradiation dose on total soluble solids content (˚Brix)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Total Soluble Solids (˚Brix)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Irradiation dose (Gy)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apantu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey HSD (0.01): Variety = 0.16; Irradiation dose = 0.36; Variety &#215; Irradiation dose = 0.57.</p><p>(69.1 g/100 g) yet similar to the Apem irradiated at 800 Gy (69.8 g/100 g) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The levels of starch found in the plantains in the present study, prior to irradiation, are consistent with values reported in literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref29">29</xref>]. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref30">30</xref>] working on Cavendish bananas found that the decrease in the degradation of starch correlated significantly with the increase in radiation dose. This is the case in this present study where higher doses of radiation resulted in quicker degradation of the starches. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref32">32</xref>] made a contrary assertion that doses below 0.75 kGy do not affect starch degradation whereas irradiation at 1.0 kGy inhibits starch degradation of Prata bananas.</p><p>Starch reserves in fruits are an important factor in contributing to the sugar content in most ripe fruits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref33">33</xref>]. In both the Apantu and Apem used in this work, the higher irradiation doses resulted in significantly more reducing sugars by stage 4 of the ripening process (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). Irradiation has been reported to affect the rate of fructose and glucose formation during storage in Prata bananas. The rate of fructose and glucose formation is reported to be reduced with increasing radiation dose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.99049-ref31">31</xref>]. This present work is showing the opposite of the reported effect of irradiation on the fructose and glucose formation during ripening. The increase is due to the irradiation breaking down the starches into the simpler sugars.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Though some earlier reports on banana/plantain had suggested that irradiations doses of around 500 Gy could maintain green life for longer, this present work</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety and irradiation dose on starch content (g/100 g)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Irradiation dose (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apantu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey HSD (0.01): Variety = 0.19; Irradiation dose = 0.44; Variety &#215; Irradiation dose = 0.70.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety and irradiation dose on sugar content (g/10 g)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Irradiation dose (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apantu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tukey HSD (0.01): Variety = 0.016; Irradiation dose = 0.037; Variety &#215; Irradiation dose = 0.059.</p><p>has shown that doses of 200 Gy are equally effective. Carbon dioxide and ethylene production rates were affected by the gamma irradiation applied. The slower the release of ethylene by the plantain fruits, the longer it stayed in the green state prior to the onset of ripening. Irradiation caused the delay in ripening of the plantain fruits by affecting the respiratory rate more, than limiting the release of the ripening hormone, ethylene.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ofosu, D.O., Appiah, F. and Banful, B. (2020) Interactive Effect of Variety and Irradiation Dose on Postharvest Behaviour of Fruits of Two Plantain (Musa sp AAB) Varieties from the Green Stage to the Onset of Ripening. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11, 372-381. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.113027</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.99049-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lelievre, J.M., Latche, A., Jones, B., Bouzayem, M. and Pech, J.C. (1997) Ethylene and Fruit Ripening. Physiologia Plantarum, 101, 727-739.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01057.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Etana</surname><given-names> M.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>Review on the Effects of Ethylene (C2H4) on Quality of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable. The Case of Banana and Tomato</article-title><source> Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 34</fpage>-<lpage>38</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, M., Pirrello, J., Chervin, C., Roustan, J.-P. and Bouzayen, M. (2015) Ethylene Control of Fruit Ripening: Revisiting the Complex Network of Transcriptional Regulation. Plant Physiology, 169, 2380-2390. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01361</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barry, C.S. and Giovannoni, J.J. (2007) Ethylene and Fruit Ripening. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 26, 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-007-9002-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pravendra, N., Trivedi, P., Sanr, A.P. and Sane, V.A. (2006) Role of Ethylene in Fruit Ripening. In: Khan, N.A., Ed., Ethylene Action in Plants, Springer-Verlog, Berlin Heidelberg, 178-224.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia-Salinas, C., Ramos-Parra, P.A. and de la Garza, R.D. (2016) Ethylene Treatment Induces Changes in Folate Profiles in Climacteric Fruit during Postharvest Ripening. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 118, 43-50.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Yang, S.F. (1987) The Role of Ethylene and Ethylene Synthesis in Fruit Ripening. In: Thompson, W.W., Nothnagel, E.A. and Huffaker, R.C., Eds., Plant Senescence: Its Biochemistry and Physiology, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, 156-166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saltveit, M.E. (1993) Internal Carbon Dioxide and Ethylene Levels in Ripening Tomato Fruit Attached to or Detached from the Plant. Physiologia Plantarum, 89, 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1993.890130.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shellie, K.C. and Saltveit, M.E. (1993) The Lack of a Respiratory Rise in Muskmelon Fruit Ripening on the Plant Challenges the Definition of Climacteric Behaviour. Journal of Experimental Botany, 44, 1403-1406.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/44.8.1403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pathak, N., Asif, M.H., Dhawan, P., Srivastava, M.K. and Nath, P. (2003) Expression and Activities of Ethylene Biosynthesis Enzymes during Ripening of Banana Fruits and Effect of 1-MCP Treatment. Plant Growth Regulation, 40, 11-19.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023040812205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bower, J., Holford, P., Latché, A. and Pech, J.-C. (2002) Culture Conditions and Detachment of the Fruit Influence the Effect of Ethylene on the Climateric Respiration of Melon. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 26, 135-146.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00007-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, M., Diretto, G., Pirrello, J., Roustan, J.P., Li, Z., Giuliano, G., Regad, F. and Bouzayen, M. (2014) The Chimeric Repressor Version of an Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) Family Member, Sl-ERF.B3, Shows Contrasting Effects on Tomato Fruit Ripening. New Phytologist, 203, 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12771</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, J.M., Joung, J.G., McQuinn, R., Chung, M.Y., Fei, Z., Tieman, D., Klee, H. and Giovannoni, J. (2012) Combined Transcriptome, Genetic Diversity and Metabolite Profiling in Tomato Fruit Reveals That the Ethylene Response Factor SlERF6 Plays an Important Role in Ripening and Carotenoid Accumulation. The Plant Journal, 70, 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04863.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Fruit Sales Corporation (1975) Banana Ripening Guide. Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, M.C., Wang, S. and Lencki, R. (2001) Influence of Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, and Degree of Cutting on the Respiration Rate of Rutabaga. Journal of Food Science, 66, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15577.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adao, R.C. and Gloria, M.B.A. (2005) Bioactive Amines and Carbohydrate Changes during Ripening of “Prata” Banana (Musa acuminate x M. balbisiana). Food Chemistry, 90, 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">JCAM Japan Customs Analysis Methods (2001) Quantitative Analysis of Reducing Sugars in Sugar Preparations Consisting of Sugar and Dextrin. No. 114-R1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dadzie, B.K. and Orchard, J.E. (1997) Routine Post-Harvest Screening of Banana/Plantain Hybrids: Criteria and Methods. INIBAP Technical Guidelines 2, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Montpellier, 75-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dionisio, A.P., Gomes, R.T. and Oetterer, M. (2009) Ionizing Radiation Effects on Food Vitamins: A Review. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 52, 1267-1278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132009000500026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Follett, P.A. and Weinert, E.D. (2009) Comparative Radiation Dose Mapping of Single Fruit Type and Mixed-Fruit Boxes for Export from Hawaii. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 33, 231-244.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00315.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farkas, J. (2006) Irradiation for Better Foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 17, 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boynton, B.B., Welt, B.A., Sims, C.A., Brecht, J.K., Balaban, M.O. and Marshall, M.A. (2005) Effect of Low-Dose Electron Beam Irradiation on Respiration, Microbiology, Color and Texture of Fresh-Cut Cantaloupe. HortTechnology, 15, 802-807.  
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.15.4.0802</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barrera, V.J., Cayón, S.G. and Robles, G.J. (2009) Influencia de la exposición de las hojas y el epicarpio de frutos sobre el desarrollo y la calidad del racimo de plátano Hartón (Musa AAB Simmonds). Agronomia Colombiana, 27, 73-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arrieta, A., Baquero, U. and Barrera, J. (2006) Physico-Chemical Characterization of the Maturation Process Papocho Banana (Musa ABB Simmonds). Agronomía Colombiana, 24, 48-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mulagund, J., Porika, H., Soorianathasundaram, K. and Deepika, C. (2015) Influence of Growth Regulators Combined with Chemicals to Improve Post-Harvest Fruit Quality in Banana cv. Nendran (Musa AAB). Journal of Food Processing &amp; Technology, 6, 428. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000428</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Biale, J.B. (1960) Respiration of Fruits. In: Ruhland, W., Ed., Handbuch der. Pflanzenphysiologie, Vol. XII, Part 2, Springer, Berlin, 536-592.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferris, R.S.B., Ortiz, R. and Vuylsteke, D. (1999) Fruit Quality Evaluation of Plantains, Plantain Hybrids, and Cooking Bananas. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 15, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00067-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Annor, G.A., Asamoah Bonti, P. and Sakyi Dawson, E. (2016) Fruit Physical Characteristics, Proximate, Mineral and Starch Characterization of FHIA 19 and FHIA 20 Plantain and FHIA 03 Cooking Banana Hybrids. SpringerPlus, 5, 796.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2465-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marriott, J., Robinson, M. and Karikari, S.K. (1981) Starch and Sugar Transformation during the Ripening of Plantains and Bananas. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 32, 1021-1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740321011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Surendranathan</surname><given-names> K.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Post-Harvest Biotechnology of Fruits with Special Reference to Banana—Perspective and Scope</article-title><source> Indian Journal of Biotechnology</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 39</fpage>-<lpage>46</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gloria, M.B.A. and Adao, R.C. (2013) Effect of Gamma Radiation on the Ripening and Levels of Bioactive Amines in Bananas cv. Prata. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 87, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.02.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vieira, J.O. (1995) Efeitos da radiacao gama em banana Prata (Musa sp., grupo AAB) irradiada em diferentes graus de maturidade e armazenada em condicao ambiente e em camara fria. PhD Thesis, USP, Piracicaba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.99049-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souleyre, E.J.F., Iannetta, P.P.M., Ross, H.A., Hancock, R.D., Shepherd, L.V.T., Taylor, R.V., Mark, A. and Davies, H.V. (2004) Starch Metabolism in Developing Strawberry. Plant Physiology, 121, 369-376.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0338.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>